Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:05:35.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Using Adaptive Traits in the Ear to Estimate Ecology of Early Snakes

from Part IV - Neurobiological Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2022

By
Hongyu Yi
Edited by
David J. Gower  and
Hussam Zaher
David J. Gower
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Hussam Zaher
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Get access

Summary

Snakes have distinct body plans that can be traced to the origin of the clade. It remains unresolved whether ancestral snakes were adapted to terrestrial environments as burrowers, or to marine environments as swimmers. Recently, new approaches have been used to infer fossorial and aquatic specialists in the early evolution of snakes, using virtual CT models of the ear of fossils. This chapter reviews variation in the osseous part of the ear of major snake lineages. Vestibules are relatively large in fossorial species and small in aquatic snakes. Using quantitative analyses of bony labyrinth geometry, it has been suggested that putative stem snakes, such as Dinilysia patagonica, were fossorial. Improvements to testing correlations between bony labyrinth morphology and ecology can be made in the refinement of quantitative approaches to capturing and analysing shape variations, as well as better classifications of ecology. Using inner and middle ear morphology to improve the accuracy and precision of inferences of the ecology of the ancestral snake will depend also upon robust, well-resolved phylogenies for extinct and extant taxa, and denser taxonomic and ecomorphological sampling.

Keywords

adaptationmorphologyevolutionsensory biologypalaeontologyfossilsvestibulelabyrinthecologyecomorphology
Type
Chapter
Information
The Origin and Early Evolutionary History of Snakes , pp. 271 - 293
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lee, M. S. Y., Bell, G. L., and Caldwell, M. W., The origin of snake feeding. Nature, 400 (1999), 655–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, T. W., Townsend, T. M., Mulcahy, D. G., et al., Integrated analyses resolve conflicts over squamate reptile phylogeny and reveal unexpected placements for fossil taxa. PLoS ONE, 10 (2015), e0118199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsiang, A. Y., Field, D. J., Webster, T. H., et al., The origin of snakes: revealing the ecology, behavior, and evolutionary history of early snakes using genomics, phenomics, and the fossil record. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15 (2015), 87.Google Scholar
Yi, H. and Norell, M. A., The burrowing origin of modern snakes. Science Advances, 1 (2015), e1500743.Google Scholar
Yi, H. and Norell, M., The bony labyrinth of Platecarpus (Squamata: Mosasauria) and aquatic adaptations in squamate reptiles. Palaeoworld, 28 (2019), 550–561.Google Scholar
Palci, A., Hutchinson, M. N., Caldwell, M. W., and Lee, M. S. Y., The morphology of the inner ear of squamate reptiles and its bearing on the origin of snakes. Royal Society Open Science, 4 (2017), 170685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthbertson, R. S., Maddin, H. C., Holmes, R. B., and Anderson, J. S., The braincase and endosseous labyrinth of Plioplatecarpus peckensis (Mosasauridae, Plioplatecarpinae), with functional implications for locomotor behavior. Anatomical Record, 298 (2015), 1597–1611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgi, J. A., Semicircular canal morphology as evidence of locomotor environment in amniotes. Unpublished PhD thesis (Stony Brook, NY: The Graduate School, Stony Brook University, 2008).Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. A., Kearney, M., Maisano, J. A., Rieppel, O., and Behlke, A. D. B., Assembling the squamate tree of life: perspectives from the phenotype and the fossil record. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 53 (2012), 3–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S., Osteology of the Reptiles (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Evans, S. E., The lepidosaurian ear: variations on a theme. In Clack, J. A., Fay, R. R. and Popper, A. N., eds., Evolution of the Vertebrate Ear – Evidence from the Fossil Record. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 59 (New York: Springer International Publishing, 2016). pp. 245–84.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. B., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Brandt, C., and Madsen, P. T, Hearing with an atympanic ear: good vibration and poor sound-pressure detection in the royal python, Python regius . Journal of Experimental Biology, 215 (2012), 331–342.Google Scholar
Müller, J., Bickelmann, C., and Sobral, G., The evolution and fossil history of sensory perception in amniote vertebrates. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 46 (2018), 495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbrink, F. T., Grazziotin, F. G., Pyron, R. A., et al., Interrogating genomic-scale data for Squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships. Systematic Biology, 69 (2020), 502–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaher, H., Murphy, R. W., Arredondo, J. C., et al., Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PLoS ONE, 14 (2019), e0216148.Google Scholar
Greene, H., Snakes: The Evolution of Mystery in Nature (Oakland: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Miller, M. R., The cochlear duct of lizards and snakes. American Zoologist, 6 (1966), 421–429.Google Scholar
Simões, B. F., Sampaio, F. L., Jared, C., et al., Visual system evolution and the nature of the ancestral snake. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28 (2015), 1309–1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konishi, T., Caldwell, M. W., Nishimura, T., Sakurai, K., and Tanoue, K., A new halisaurine mosasaur (Squamata: Halisaurinae) from Japan: the first record in the western Pacific realm and the first documented insights into binocular vision in mosasaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 14 (2016), 809–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simões, B. F., Gower, D. J., Rasmussen, A. R., et al., Spectral diversification and trans-Species allelic polymorphism during the land-to-sea transition in snakes. Current Biology, 30 (2020), 2608–2615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wever, E. G., The Reptile Ear: Its Structure and Function (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Palci, A., Hutchinson, M. N., Caldwell, M. W., Scanlon, J. D., and Lee, M. S. Y., Palaeoecological inferences for the fossil Australian snakes Yurlunggur and Wonambi (Serpentes, Madtsoiidae). Royal Society Open Science, 5 (2018), 172012.Google Scholar
Cundall, D., Wallach, V., and Rossman, D. A., The systematic relationships of the snake genus Anomochilus . Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 109 (1993), 275–299.Google Scholar
Conrad, J. L., Phylogeny and systematics of Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 310 (2008), 1–182.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J., Kuczynski, C. A., Smith, S. A., et al., Branch lengths, support, and congruence: testing the phylogenomicapproach with 20 nuclear loci in snakes. Systematic Biology, 57 (2008), 420–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyron, R. A., Burbrink, F. T., and Wiens, J. J., A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13(2013), 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueroa, A., McKelvy, A. D., Grismer, L. L., Bell, C. D., and Lailvaux, S. P., A species-levelphylogeny of extant snakes with description of a new colubrid subfamily and genus. PLoS ONE, 11 (2016), e0161070.Google Scholar
Miralles, A., Marin, L., Markus, D., et al., Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31 (2018), 1782–1793.Google Scholar
Haas, G., Anatomical observations on the head of Liotyphlops albirostris (Typhlopidae, Ophidia). Acta Zoologica, 45 (1964), 1–62.Google Scholar
Rieppel, O. and Maisano, J. A., The skull of the rare Malaysian snake Anomochilus leonardi Smith, based on high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 149 (200), 671–685.Google Scholar
Olori, J. C., Digital endocasts of the cranial cavity and osseous labyrinth of the burrowing snake Uropeltis woodmasoni (Alethinophidia: Uropeltidae). Copeia, 2010 (2010), 14–26.Google Scholar
O’Shea, M., Boas and Pythons of the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sanders, K. L., Mumpuni, A. Hamidy, J. J. Head, , and Gower, D. J., Phylogeny and divergence times of filesnakes (Acrochordus): inferences from morphology, fossils and three molecular loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56 (2010), 857–867.Google Scholar
Yamasaki, Y. and Mori, Y., Seasonal activity pattern of a nocturnal fossorial snake, Achalinus spinalis (Serpentes: Xenodermidae). Current Herpetology, 36 (2017), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shine, R., Harlow, P., Keogh, J. S., and Boeadi, Biology and commercial utilization of acrochordid snakes, with special reference to Karung (Acrochordus javanicus). Journal of Herpetology, 29 (1995), 352–360.Google Scholar
Cundall, D. and Irish, F., The snake skull. In Gans, C., Gaunt, A. S., and Adler, K., eds., Biology of the Reptilia, Volume 20, Morphology H (Ithaca: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 2008). pp. 349–692.Google Scholar
Peng, L., Yang, D., Duan, S., and Huang, S., Mitochondrial genome of the Common burrowing snake Achalinus spinalis (Reptilia: Xenodermatidae). Mitochondrial DNA, Part B Resources, 2 (2017), 571–572.Google Scholar
Guo, P. and Zhao, E.- M., Comparison of skull morphology in nine Asian pit vipers (Serpentes: Crotalinae). Herpetological Journal, 16 (2006), 305–313.Google Scholar
You, C. W., Poyarkov, N. A., and Lin, S. M., Diversity of the snail-eating snakes Pareas (Serpentes, Pareatidae) from Taiwan. Zoologica Scripta, 44 (2015), 349–361.Google Scholar
Plummer, M., Observations on hibernacula and overwintering ecology of Eastern hog-nosed snakes (Heterodon platirhinos). Herpetological Review, 33 (2002), 89–90.Google Scholar
Michener, M. C. and Lazell, J. D., Distribution and relative abundance of the hognose snake, Heterodon platirhinos, in eastern New England. Journal of Herpetology, 23 (1989), 35–40.Google Scholar
Socha, J. J., Gliding flight in Chrysopelea: turning a snake into a wing. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 51 (2011), 969–982.Google Scholar
Bell, J. L. and Polcyn, M. J., Dallasaurus turneri, a new primitive mosasauroid from the Middle Turonian of Texas and comments on the phylogeny of Mosasauridae (Squamata). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 84 (2005), 177–194.Google Scholar
Yi, H., Sampath, D., Schoenfeld, S., and Norell, M. A., Reconstruction of inner-ear shape and size in mosasaurs (Reptilia: Squamata) reveals complex aquatic adaptation strategies in secondary aquatic reptiles. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 32 Supplement (2012), 198A.Google Scholar
Adams, D. C. and Otárola-Castillo, E., Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (2013), 393–399.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F. L., Morphometric Tool for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Richtsmeier, J. T., Paik, C. H., Elfert, P. C., Cole, T. M., and Dahlman, H. R., Precision, repeatability, and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 32 (1995), 217–227.Google Scholar
Gunz, P., Ramsier, M., Kuhrig, M., Hublin, J.- J., and Spoor, F., The mammalian bony labyrinth reconsidered, introducing a comprehensive geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Anatomy, 220 (2012), 529–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ni, X., Flynn, J. J., and Wyss, A. R., Imaging the inner ear in fossil mammals: high-resolution CT scanning and 3-D virtual reconstructions. Palaeontologica Electronica, 15 (2012), 1–10.Google Scholar
Boistel, R., Herrel, A., Lebrun, R., et al., Shake rattle and roll: the bony labyrinth and aerial descent in squamates. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 51 (2011), 957–968.Google Scholar
Georgi, J. A., Sipla, J. S., and Forster, C. A., Turning semicircular canal function on its head: dinosaurs and a novel vestibular analysis. PLoS ONE, 8 (2013), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., and Bookstein, F. L., Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In Slice, D. E., ed., Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (Boston: Springer, 2005), pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. and Wiens, J. J., Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 94 (2016), 537–547.Google Scholar
Spoor, F., Bajpai, S., Hussain, S. T., and Kumar, K., Thewissen, J. G. M., Vestibular evidence for the evolution of aquatic behaviour in early cetaceans. Nature, 417 (2002), 163–165.Google Scholar
Ekdale, E. G., Comparative anatomy of the bony labyrinth (inner ear) of placental mammals. PLoS ONE, 8 (2013), e66624.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., On some extinct reptiles from Patagonia, of the genera Miolania, Dinilysia, and Genyodectes . Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 70 (1901), 169–184.Google Scholar
Estes, R., Frazzetta, T. H., and Williams, E. E., Studies on the fossil snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. I. Cranial morphology. Bulletin Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard University, 119 (1970), 25–74.Google Scholar
Frazzetta, T. H., Studies on the fossil snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. Part 2. Jaw machinery in the earliest snakes. Forma et Functio, 3 (1970), 205–221.Google Scholar
Zaher, H. and Scanferla, A., The skull of the Upper Cretaceous snake Dinilysia patagonica Smith-Woodward, 1901, and its phylogenetic position revisited. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 164 (2012), 194–238.Google Scholar
Simões, T. R., Caldwell, M. W., Tałanda, M., et al., The origin of squamates revealed by a Middle Triassic lizard from the Italian Alps. Nature, 557 (2018), 706–709.Google Scholar
Zaher, H., Apesteguía, S., and Scanferla, A., The anatomy of the Upper Cretaceous snake Najash rionegrina Apesteguía & Zaher, 2006, and the evolution of limblessness in snakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156 (2009), 801–826.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M. W. and Albino, A. M., Palaeoenvironment and palaeoecology of three Cretaceous snakes: Pachyophis, Pachyrhachis, and Dinilysia . Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 46 (2001), 203–218.Google Scholar
Hecht, M. K., The vertebral morphology of the Cretaceous snake, Dinilysia patagonica Woodward. Neues Jarhbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte, 1982 (1982), 523–532.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M. W. and Albino, A., Exceptionally preserved skeletons of the Cretaceous snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward, 1901. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22 (2002), 861–866.Google Scholar
Scanlon, J. D., A new large madtsoiid snake from the Miocene of the Northern Territory. The Beagle: Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territories, 9 (1992), 49–60.Google Scholar
Scanlon, J. D. and Lee, M. S. Y., The Pleistocene serpent Wonambi and the early evolution of snakes. Nature 403 (2000), 416–420.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×