Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:37:22.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2022

Yanna Krupnikov  and
John Barry Ryan
Yanna Krupnikov
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
John Barry Ryan
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Other Divide , pp. 263 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics, 70(2): 542–555.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven W.. 2018. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave Like Rabid Partisans.” Political Psychology, 39(S1): 119–135.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas. 2014. “Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization.” Journal of Politics, 76(3): 607–620.Google Scholar
Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, Robert, and Ryan, John Barry. 2015. Experts, Activists, and Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John, Lake, David A., Mansbridge, Jane C. et al. 2020. “Will the US Media Call the Right Winner on Election Night? Don’t Count on It.” The Guardian, October 7: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/07/us-media-election-night-apsaGoogle Scholar
Alicke, Mark D. 2000. “Evaluating Social Comparison Targets.” In Suls, Jerry and Wheeler, Ladd (eds.), Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press. pp.271–293.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Sarah E., Butler, Daniel M., and Harbridge-Yong, Laurel. 2020. Rejecting Compromise: Legislators’ Fear of Primary Voters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 1950. “Towards a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties.” American Political Science Review, 44(3 – Supplement): 1–96.Google Scholar
Aronow, Peter, Kalla, Joshua, Orr, Lilla, and Ternovski, John. 2020. “Evidence of Rising Rates of Inattentiveness on Lucid in 2020.” Working paper: https://osf.io/8sbe4/downloadGoogle Scholar
Auger, Giselle. 2013. “Fostering Democracy through Social Media: Evaluating Diametrically Opposed Nonprofit Advocacy Organizations’ Use of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.” Public Relations Review, 39: 369–376.Google Scholar
Badger, Emily and Bui, Quoctrung. 2018. “Americans Say Their Politics Don’t Define Them. But It’s Complicated.” The New York Times, October 12: www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/12/upshot/us-politics-identity.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bail, Christopher A., Argyle, Lisa P., Brown, Taylor W. et al. 2018. “Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37): 9216–9221.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason, Jerit, Jennifer, Pollock, William, and Rainey, Carlisle. 2014. “The Question(s) of Political Knowledge.” American Political Science Review, 108(4): 840–855.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael and Pope, Jeremy. 2019. “Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America.” American Political Science Review, 113(1): 38–54.Google Scholar
Bastos, Marco T. and Mercea, Dan. 2016. “Serial Activists: Political Twitter beyond Influentials and the Twittertariat.” New Media and Society, 18(10): 2359–2378.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. 1991. Meanings in Life. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Elizabeth. 2011. “Promoting Political Agency, Addressing Political Inequality: A Multilevel Model of Internal Political Efficacy.” The Journal of Politics, 73(1): 216–231.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen and Jennings, M. Kent. 1982. “Pathways to Participation.” American Political Science Review, 76(1): 94–108.Google Scholar
Beckers, Kathleen. 2017. “How Ordinary is the Ordinary Wo(man) on the Street? An Analysis of Vox Pop Characteristics in Television News.” Journalism Practice, 11(8): 1026–1041.Google Scholar
Beckers, Kathleen. 2018. “Vox Pops in the News: The Journalists’ Perspective.” Communications, 43(1): 101–111.Google Scholar
Beckers, Kathleen. 2019. “What Vox Pops Say and How That Matters: Effects of Vox Pops in Television.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(4): 980–1003.Google Scholar
Beckers, Kathleen. 2020. “The Voice of the People in the News: A Content Analysis of Public Opinion Displays in Routine and Election News” Journalism Studies, 21(15), 2078–2095.Google Scholar
Beckers, Kathleen and Harder, Raymond A.. 2016. “ ‘Twitter Just Exploded’: Social Media As Alternative Vox Pop.” Digital Journalism, 4(7): 910–920.Google Scholar
Beckers, Kathleen, Walgrave, Stefaan, and Van den Bulck, Hilde. 2018. “Opinion Balance in Vox Pop Television news.” Journalism Studies, 19(2): 284–296.Google Scholar
Bekkers, René. 2005. “Participation in Voluntary Associations: Relations with Resources, Personality, and Political Values.” Political Psychology, 26(3): 439–454.Google Scholar
Belk, Russel W., Ger, Güliz, and Askegaard, Søren. 2003. “The Fire of Desire: A Multi-Sited Inquiry into Consumer Passion.” Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3): 326–352.Google Scholar
Benenson, Jodi and Bergom, Inger. 2019. “Voter Participation, Socioeconomic Status, and Institutional Contexts in Higher Education.” The Review of Higher Education, 42(4): 1665–1688.Google Scholar
Bennett, Linda L. M. and Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.” American Politics Research, 17(1): 105–122.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. “Can We Talk? Self-Presentation and the Survey Response.” Political Psychology, 25(4): 643–659.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2011. “Education and Political Participation: Exploring the Causal Link.” Political Behavior, 33(3): 357–373.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey and Sobieraj, Sarah. 2013. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bevan, Jennifer L., Gomez, Ruth, and Sparks, Lisa. 2014. “Disclosures about Important Life Events on Facebook: Relationships with Stress and Quality of Life.” Computers in Human Behavior, 39: 246–253.Google Scholar
Bloch, Peter H., Commuri, Suraj, and Arnold, Todd J.. 2009. “Exploring the Origins of Enduring Product Involvement.” Qualitative Market Research, 12(1): 49–69.Google Scholar
Boczkowski, Pablo J., Mitchelstein, Eugenia, and Walter, Martin. 2011. “Convergence across Divergence: Understanding the Gap in the Online News Choices of Journalists and Consumers in Western Europe and Latin America.” Communication Research, 38: 376–396.Google Scholar
Bode, Leticia. 2016. “Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media.” Mass Communication and Society, 19(1): 24–48.Google Scholar
Bolsen, Toby and Leeper, Thomas. 2013. “Self-Interest and Attention to News among Issue Publics.” Political Communication, 30: 329–248.Google Scholar
Booth, Paul and Booth, Katie. 2014. “The Discourse of Authenticity in the Doctor Who Fan Community.” In Barr, Jason and Mustachio, Camille D.G. (eds.), The Language of Doctor Who: From Shakespeare to Alien Tongues. London: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 259–273.Google Scholar
Bosch, Brandon. 2014. “Beyond Vox Pop: The Role of News Sourcing and Political Beliefs in Exemplification Effects.” Mass Communication and Society, 17(2): 217–235.Google Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl and MacKenzie, Scott A.. 2014. “Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science, 58(1): 48–62.Google Scholar
Bougher, Lori. 2017. “The Correlates of Discord: Identity, Issue Alignment, and Political Hostility in Polarized America.” Political Behavior, 39(3): 731–762.Google Scholar
Boulianne, Shelley. 2011. “Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects between News Media and Political Interest.” Political Communication, 28(2): 147–162.Google Scholar
Bowman, Nicholas A. and Bastedo, Michael N.. 2011. “Anchoring Effects in World University Rankings: Exploring Biases in Reputation Scores.” Higher Education, 61: 431–444.Google Scholar
boyd, danah. 2010. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In Papacharissi, Zizi (ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Boydstun, Amber E. 2013. Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Alan. 2012. “Interview with Morris Holbrook.” Royal Holloway University of London Marketing Blog, June 28: http://royalhollowaymarketing.blogspot.com/2012/06/interview-with-morris-holbrook.htmlGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review, 89(2): 271–294.Google Scholar
Brady, William J., Crockett1, M. J., and Van Bavel, Jay J. 2020. “The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4): 978–1010.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2016. “Trump Won Because Voters are Ignorant, Literally.” Foreign Policy, November 10: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10/the-dance-of-the-dunces-trump-clinton-election-republican-democrat/Google Scholar
Bright, Jonathan. 2016. “The Social News Gap: How News Reading and News Sharing Diverge.” Journal of Communication, 66: 343–365.Google Scholar
Brosius, Hans-Bernd and Bathelt, Anke. 1994. “The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive Communications.” Communication Research, 21(2): 48–78.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. and Skovron, Christopher. 2018. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review, 112(3): 542–563.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E., Kalla, Joshua L., and Westwood, Sean J.. 2021. “Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not.” Working paper: 10.31219/osf.io/9btsqGoogle Scholar
Burns, Alexander and Martin, Jonathan. 2020. “Trump Struggles on GOP Turf As Women Favor Biden.” The New York Times, September 25: Section A Page 1.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burrow, Anthony and Rainone, Nicolette. 2017. “How Many Likes Did I Get?: Purpose Moderates Links between Positive Social Media Feedback and Self-Esteem.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69: 232–236.Google Scholar
Buttice, Matthew, Huckfeldt, Robert, and Ryan, John Barry. 2009. “Political Polarization and Communication Networks in the 2006 Congressional Elections.” In Mondak, Jeffery J. and Mitchell, Donna-Gene (eds.), Fault Lines: Why the Republicans Lost Congress. New York: Routledge, pp. 42–60.Google Scholar
Cain Miller, Claire. 2020. “More Partisanship But Happier Couples?” The New York Times, October 27: Section A Page 14.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph N. 1985. “Production Principles for Turn-Taking Rules in Social Interaction: Socially Anxious vs. Socially Secure Persons.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4: 193–212.Google Scholar
Carlson, Taylor N. 2018. “Modeling Political Information Transmission as a Game of Telephone.” The Journal of Politics, 80(1): 348–352.Google Scholar
Carlson, Taylor N. 2019. “Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication.” American Political Science Review, 113(2): 325–339.Google Scholar
Carlson, Taylor and Settle, Jaime. 2016. “Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions.” Political Behavior, 38(4): 817–859.Google Scholar
Chatzitheochari, Stella and Arber, Sara. 2012. “Class, Gender and Time Poverty: A Time-Use Analysis of British Workers’ Free Time Resources.” The British Journal of Sociology, 63(3): 451–471.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Keith and Rohla, Ryne. 2018. “The Effect of Partisanship and Political Advertising on Close Family Ties.” Science, 360(6392): 1020–1024.Google Scholar
Choi, Sujin. 2014. “Flow, Diversity, Form, and Influence of Political Talk in Social-Media-Based Public Forums.” Human Communication Research, 40: 209–237.Google Scholar
Cisneros, J. David and Nakayama, Thomas K.. 2015. “New Media, Old Racisms: Twitter, Miss America, and Cultural Logics of Race.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(2): 108–127.Google Scholar
Claassen, Ryan L. and Ryan, John Barry. 2016. “Social Desirability, Hidden Biases, and Support for Hillary Clinton.” PS, 49(4): 730–735.Google Scholar
Clark, Jenna L., Algoe, Sara B., and Green, Melanie C.. 2018. “Social Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1): 32–37.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cohn, Nate and Quealy, Kevin. 2019. “The Democratic Electorate on Twitter Is Not the Actual Democratic Electorate.” The New York Times, April 9: www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/08/upshot/democratic-electorate-twitter-real-life.htmlGoogle Scholar
Connors, Elizabeth C. 2020. “The Social Dimension of Political Values.” Political Behavior, 42(3): 961–982.Google Scholar
Connors, Elizabeth C., Krupnikov, Yanna, and Ryan, John Barry. 2019. “How Transparency Affects Survey Responses.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(S1): 185–209.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Searing, Donald D. and Crewe, Ivor M.. 2002. “The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion.” British Journal of Political Science, 32(1): 21–62.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(4): 578–599.Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems In Mass Publics.” In Apter, David (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 206–261.Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander and McClellan, Oliver A.. 2019. “Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained from a New Source of Online Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander, Leeper, Thomas J., and Mullinix, Kevin J.. 2018. “Generalizability of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimates Across Samples.” Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(49): 12441–12446.Google Scholar
Cornwall, Gail. 2020. “The Right Way to Talk About Politics with Your Kids, According to Experts.” Good Housekeeping, August 24: www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/parenting/a32811769/talking-to-kids-about-politics/Google Scholar
Cornwell, Susan, Morgan, David and Cowen, Richard. 2020. “Trump Impeachment Trial Opens as Watchdog Faults White House on Ukraine.” Reuters. Retrieved from https://fr.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-trump-impeachment-idUKKBN1ZF18QGoogle Scholar
Costa, Mia. 2021. “Ideology, Not Affect: What Americans Want From Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science, 65(2): 342–358.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Zhang, Baobao, and Caughey, Devin. 2018. “Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis, 26(4): 399–416.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell. 1980. “Reassessing Parental Socialization: Indicator Unreliability Versus Generational Transfer.” American Political Science Review, 74(2): 421–431.Google Scholar
Darling, Nancy and Steinberg, Laurence. 1993. “Parenting Style as Context: An Integrative Model.” Psychological Bulletin, 113(3): 487–496.Google Scholar
Daschmann, Gregor. 2000. “Vox Pop & Polls: The impact of Poll Results and Voter Statements in the Media on the Perception of a Climate of Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12: 160–181.Google Scholar
Daschmann, Gregor and Brosius, Hans-Bernd. 1999. “Can a Single Incident Create an Issue? Exemplars in German Television Magazine Shows.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1): 35–51.Google Scholar
Davis, Robert and Lee Phillip, McGinnis. 2016. “Conceptualizing Excessive Fan Consumption Behavior.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28: 252–262.Google Scholar
de Zúñiga, Homero Gil, Logan Molyneux,and Pei Zheng. 2014. “Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships.” Journal of Communication, 64(4): 612–634.Google Scholar
de Zúñiga, Homero Gil, Valenzuela, Sebastián, and Weeks, Brian E.. 2016. “Motivations for Political Discussion: Antecedents and Consequences on Civic Engagement.” Human Communication Research, 42(4): 533–552.Google Scholar
Dean, Jonathan. 2017. “Politicising Fandom.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2): 408–424.Google Scholar
Delton, Andrew W., DeScioli, Peter, and Ryan, Timothy J.. 2020. “Moral Obstinacy in Political Negotiations.” Political Psychology, 41(1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Denham, Bryan E. 2008. “Folk Devils, News Icons and the Construction of Moral Panics.” Journalism Studies, 9(6): 945–961.Google Scholar
Dias, Nicholas and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2021. “The Partisan Roots of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Partisanship from Policy Positions.” American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12628Google Scholar
Dickerson, John. 2020. The Hardest Job in the World: The American Presidency. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Mary Dee and Gentry, James W.. 1983. “Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers.” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2): 225–235.Google Scholar
Diehl, Trevor, Ardèvol-Abreu, Alberto and de Zúñiga, Homero Gil. 2019. “How Engagement with Journalists on Twitter Reduces Public Perceptions of Media Bias.” Journalism Practice, 13(8): 971–975.Google Scholar
Dimmock, James A. and Grove, J. Robert. 2005. “Relationship of Fan Identification to Determinants of Aggression.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(1): 37–47.Google Scholar
Dinas, Elias. 2013. “Opening ‘Openness to Change‘: Political Events and the Increased Sensitivity of Young Adults.” Political Research Quarterly, 66(4): 868–882.Google Scholar
Dinas, Elias. 2014. “Why Does the Apple Fall Far from the Tree? How Early Political Socialization Prompts Parent-Child Dissimilarity.” British Journal of Political Science, 44(4): 827–852.Google Scholar
Dionísio, Pedro, Leal, Carmo and Mountinho, Luiz. 2008. “Fandom Affiliation and Tribal Behaviour: A Sports Marketing Application.” Qualitative Marketing Research: An International Journal, 11(1): 17–39.Google Scholar
Doosje, Bertjan, Spears, Russell, Ellemers, Naomi and Koomen, Willem. 1999. “Perceived Group Variability in Intergroup Relations: The Distinctive Role of Social Identity.” European Review of Social Psychology, 10(1): 41–74.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. and Levendusky, Matthew. 2019. “What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1): 114–122.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levendusky, Matthew, and Ryan, John Barry. 2020. “How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, DOI: 10.1017/XPS.2020.28Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levendusky, Matthew, and Ryan, John Barry. 2021a. “Affective Polarization, Local Contexts, and Public Opinion in America.” Nature Human Behaviour, 5: 28–38Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levendusky, Matthew, and Ryan, John Barry. 2021b. “(Mis-)Estimating Affective Polarization.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/715603Google Scholar
Duggan, Maeve and Smith, Aaron. 2016. “The Political Environment on Social Media.” Pew Report, October 25: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna and Lawrence, Regina G.. 2015. “What Predicts the Game Frame? Media Ownership, Electoral Context, and Campaign News.” Political Communication, 32(1): 43–60.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna L., Searles, Kathleen, Sui, Mingxiao, and Paul, Newly. 2018. “News Attention in a Mobile Era.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2):107–124.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edrington, Candice L. and Lee, Nicole. 2018. “Tweeting a Social Movement: Black Lives Matter and its use of Twitter to Share Information, Build Community, and Promote Action.” Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2(2): 289–306.Google Scholar
Eiser, J. Richard., Stafford, Thomas, Henneberry, John and Catney, Philip. 2009. “‘Trust me, I’m a Scientist (Not a Developer)’: Perceived Expertise and Motives as Predictors of Trust in Assessment of Risk from Contaminated Land.” Risk Analysis, 29(2): 288–297.Google Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi and Wendy, Van Rijswijk. 1997. “Identity Needs Versus Social Opportunities: The Use of Group-Level and Individual-Level Identity Management Strategies.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(1): 52–65.Google Scholar
Naomi, Ellemers, Spears, Russell and Doosje, Bertjan. 2002. “Self and Social Identity.” Annual Review of Psychology, 53: 161–186.Google Scholar
Epstein, Reid. 2020. “Wild Card in Wisconsin: Virus in a Purple Region.” The New York Times, October 31: Section A Page 15.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz and Schneider, Peter. 1956. “Dimensions of Political Involvement.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(1): 128–142.Google Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr., Morey, Alyssa C., and Hutchens, Myiah J.. 2011. “Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective.” Journal of Communication, 61: 1082–1103.Google Scholar
Fan, Rui, Varameshb, Ali, Varolc, Onur, et al. 2018. “Does Putting Your Emotions Into Words Make You Feel Better? Measuring the Minute-Scale Dynamics of Emotions from Online Data.” Working paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.09725.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fandos, Nicholas. 2020. “A Step-by-Step Guide to Trump’s Impeachment Trial.” The New York Times, January 14: Section A, Page 16.Google Scholar
Fandos, Nicholas, Schaff, Erin and Cochrane, Emily. 2021. “‘It Didn’t Feel Real’: Covering Politics One Moment, and Chaos the Next.” The New York Times, January 8: Section A, Page 15.Google Scholar
Federico, Christopher M. and Hunt, Corrie V.. 2013. “Political Information, Political Involvement, and Reliance on Ideology in Political Evaluation.” Political Behavior, 35(1): 89–112.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1990. “Information and Rationality in Elections.” In Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H. (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 329–342.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 2016. “The Political Parties Have Sorted.” Hoover Institution Essays on Contemporary American Politics, Series No. 3. www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/fiorina_3_finalfile.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting and Political Stalemate. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L. and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2014. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review, 108(3): 499–519.Google Scholar
Francis, Lizzy. 2017. “7 Fathers on Why They Take Their Kids to Protests.” Fatherly.com, www.fatherly.com/love-money/7-dads-on-why-they-take-their-kids-to-protests/Google Scholar
Freelon, Deen. 2015. “Discourse Architecture, Ideology, and Democratic Norms in Online Political Discussion.” New Media & Society, 17(5): 772–791.Google Scholar
Freelon, Deen, McIlwain, Charlton and Clark, Meredith. 2018. “Quantifying the Power and Consequences of Social Media Protest.” New Media & Society, 20(3): 990–1011.Google Scholar
Fry, Richard and Cilluffo, Anthony. 2019. “A Rising Share of Undergraduates Are From Poor Families, Especially at Less Selective. Colleges.” Pew Research Center Report. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/05/22/a-rising-share-of-undergraduates-are-from-poor-families-especially-at-less-selective-colleges/Google Scholar
Galais, Carolina and Blais, André and Bowler, Shaun. 2014. “Is Political Interest Absolute or Relative?” APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2455573Google Scholar
Galston, William. 2004. “Civic Education and Political Participation.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2): 263–266.Google Scholar
Galuszka, Patryk. 2015. “New Economy of Fandom.” Popular Music and Society, 38(1): 25–43.Google Scholar
Garrett, Kristin N. and Bankert, Alexa. 2020. “The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization.” British Journal of Political Science, 50(2): 621–640.Google Scholar
Gaskins, Ben, Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2020. “Qualitative Quotes: The Prevalence and Effects of Survey Respondent Exemplars in Political News Coverage.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1): 96–114.Google Scholar
Gawronski, Bertram and Bodenhausen, Galen V.. 2006. “Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change.” Psychological Bulletin, 132(5): 692–731.Google Scholar
Gerson, Michael. 2019. “Politics is Religion and the Right is Getting Ready for the End Times.” The Washington Post, March 18: www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-left-was-about-salvation-the-right-is-about-the-end-times/2019/03/18/2cd16898-49b8-11e9-9663-00ac73f49662_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Glasser, William. 1976. Positive Addiction. Oxford, England: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gnolek, Shari L., Falciano, Vincenzo T. and Kuncl, Ralph W.. 2014. “Modeling Change and Variation in U.S. News & World Report College Rankings: What Would It Really Take to Be in the Top 20?” Research in Higher Education, 55: 761–779.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan. 2003. “New Audiences, New Textualities: Anti-Fans and Non-Fans.” International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6(1): 64–81.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley and Shickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Emma. 2018. “Politics as the New Religion for Progressive Democrats.” The Atlantic, www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/poll-shows-activism-highest-among-non-religious-democrats/572674/Google Scholar
Greene, Steven. 1999. “Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach.” Political Psychology, 20(2): 393–403.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. 1965. Children and Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric. 2013. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric. 2018. “Competing Motives in a Polarized Electorate: Political Responsiveness, Identity Defensiveness, and the Rise of Partisan Antipathy.” Advances in Political Psychology, 39(S1): 159–171.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric. 2019. “Of Two Minds, But One Heart: A Good ‘Gut’ Feeling Moderates the Effect of Ambivalence on Attitude Formation and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science, 63(2): 368–384.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric, Sances, Michael W., and Zhirkov, Kirill. 2020. “Intraparty Polarization in American Politics.” The Journal of Politics, 82(4): 1616–1620.Google Scholar
Grusec, Joan E. Goodnow, Jacqueline J., and Kuczynski, Leon. 2000. “New Directions in Analyses of Parenting Contributions to Children’s Acquisition of Values.” Child Development, 71(1): 205–211.Google Scholar
Guess, Andrew M., Nyhan, Brendan, Lyons, Benjamin and Reifler, Jason. 2018. “Avoiding the Echo Chamber About Echo Chambers: Why Selective Exposure to Like-Minded Political News is Less Prevalent Than You Think.” Knight Foundation White Paper. https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media_elements/files/000/000/133/original/Topos_KF_White-Paper_Nyhan_V1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Guess, Andrew M., Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2020. “Exposure to Untrustworthy Websites in the 2016 US Election.” Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 472–480.Google Scholar
Guschwan, Matthew. 2011. “Fans, Romans, Countrymen: Soccer Fandom and Civic Identity in Contemporary Rome.” International Journal of Communication, 5: 1990–2013.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1980. “Children, Paternalism, and Education: A Liberal Argument.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 9(4): 338–358.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1995. “Civic Education and Social Diversity.” Ethics, 105(3): 557–579.Google Scholar
Hall, Judith A., Carter, Jason D., and Horgan, Terrence G.. 2000. “Gender Differences in Nonverbal Communication of Emotion.” In Fischer, A. H. (ed.), Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–117.Google Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel, Malhotra, Neil and Harrison, Brian F.. 2014. “Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(3): 327–355.Google Scholar
Harder, Raymond A., Sevenans, Julie, Van Aelst, Peter. 2017. “Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3): 275–293.Google Scholar
Hart, Joshua, Nailling, Elizabeth, Bizer, George Y. and Collins, Caitlyn K. 2015. “Attachment Theory as a Framework for Explaining Engagement with Facebook.” Personality and Individual Differences, 77: 33–40.Google Scholar
Hart, P. Sol, Chinn, Sedona, and Soroka, Stuart. 2020. “Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage.” Science Communication, 42(5): 679–697.Google Scholar
Hasell, Ariel. 2020. “Shared Emotion: The Social Amplification of Partisan News on Twitter.” Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1831937Google Scholar
Hassell, Hans G., Holbein, John B. and Miles, Matthew R.. 2020. “There is no Liberal Media Bias in Which News Stories Political Journalist Choose to Cover.” Science Advances, 6(14): eaay9344.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter and Ojeda, Christopher. 2021. “The Role of Child Perception and Motivation in Political Socialization.” British Journal of Political Science, 51(3): 1097–1118.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2011. “(Un)Numbered Voices? Reconsidering the Meaning of Public Opinion in a Digital Age.” In Goidel, Kirby (ed.), Political Polling in the Digital Age: The Challenge of Measuring and Understanding Public Opinion, Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Press, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
Hersh, Eitan. 2020. Politics is For Power: How To Move Beyond Political Hobbyism, Take Action, and Make Real Change. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Hersh, Eitan and Ghitza, Yair. 2018. “Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.” PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203997Google Scholar
Hersh, Richard H. 1999. “Generating Ideals and Transforming Lives: A Contemporary Case for the Residential Liberal Arts College.” Daedalus, 128(1): 173–194.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” The American Political Science Review, 95(3): 619–631.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc and Rudolph, Thomas. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Elizabeth, Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Ronald Paul and Robinson, Harold. 1991. “Fanatic Consumer Behavior: Athletics as a Consumption Experience.” Psychology & Marketing, 8(2): 79–99.Google Scholar
Hills, Matthew. 2002. Fan Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2005. “The Missing Link: Exploring the Relationship between Higher Education and Political Engagement.” Political Behavior, 27(1): 25–47.Google Scholar
Hinnant, Amanda, Len-Ríos, María E, and Young, Rachel. 2013. “Journalistic Use of Exemplars to Humanize Health News.” Journalism Studies, 14(4): 539–554.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Lindsay H., Jones, Philip Edward, and Young, Dannagal Goldthwaite. 2013. “Does My Comment Count? Perceptions of Political Participation in an Online Environment.” Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6): 2248–2256.Google Scholar
Holbein, John and Sunshine Hillygus, D.. 2020. Making Young Voters: Converting Civic Attitudes into Civic Actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Morris B. 1987. “An Audiovisual Inventory of Some Fanatic Consumer Behavior: the 25-Cent Tour of a Jazz Collector’s Home.” In Wallendorf, Melanie and Anderson, Paul (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research Volume 14. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 144–149.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Morris B. 2008. Playing the Changes on the Jazz Metaphor: An Expanded Conceptualization of Music, Management, and Marketing-Related Themes. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Allyson K., Green, Melanie C., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2003. “Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1): 79–125.Google Scholar
Holt, Douglas B. 1995. “How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices.” Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Housley, William, Webb, Helena, Williams, Meredydd, et al. 2018. “Interaction and Transformation on Social Media: The Case of Twitter Campaigns.” Social Media + Society: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117750721.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory A. and Malhotra, Neil. 2017. “Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior.” The Journal of Politics, 79(1): 269–283.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2001. “The Social Communication of Political Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science, 45(2): 425–438.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2007. “Unanimity, Discord, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science, 51(4): 978–995.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Levine, Jeffrey, Morgan, William, and Sprague, John. 1999. “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science, 43(3): 888–911.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Mendez, Jeanette, and Osborn, Tracy. 2004. “Disagreement, Ambivalence and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks.” Political Psychology, 26: 65–96.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Khatib, Nadia. 2007. “American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement.” American Journal of Political Science, 51(1): 63–77.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Lene, Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review, 109(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Hughes, Adam. 2019. “A Small Group of Prolific Users Account for a Majority of Political Tweets Sent by U.S. Adults.” Pew Research Center Fact Tank. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/23/a-small-group-of-prolific-users-account-for-a-majority-of-political-tweets-sent-by-u-s-adults/Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent L. 2005. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ishizuka, Patrick. 2019. “Social Class, Gender, and Contemporary Parenting Standards in the United States: Evidence from a National Survey Experiment.” Social Forces, 98(1): 31–58.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Konitzer, Tobias and Tedin, Kent. 2018. “The Home as a Political Fortress: Family Agreement in an Era of Polarization.” The Journal of Politics, 80(4): 1326–1338.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Krupenkin, Masha. 2018. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Advances in Political Psychology, 39(1): 201–218.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean. 2019. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1): 129–146.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3): 405–431.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science, 59(3): 690–707.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sarah J., Bailey, Moya and Welles, Brooke Foucault. 2020. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie and Frantz, Cynthia McPherson. 1997. “The Impact of Trauma on Meaning: From Meaningless World to Meaningful Life.” In Power, Mick and Brewin, Chris (eds.), The Transformation of Meaning in Psychological Therapies: Integrating Theory and Practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
Japutra, Arnold, Ekinci, Yuksel, and Simkin, Lyndon. 2017. “Self-Congruence, Brand Attachment and Compulsive Buying.” Journal of Business Research, 99: 456–463.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Hakeem. 2020. “The Curious Case of Black Conservatives: Construct Validity and the 7-point Liberal-Conservative Scale.” Working paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3602209Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent and Markus, Gregory B.. 1988. “Political Involvement in the Later Years: A Longitudinal Survey.” American Journal of Political Science, 32(2): 302–316.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent and Niemi, Richard G.. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” American Political Science Review, 62(1): 169–184.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent and Niemi, Richard G.. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” The Journal of Politics, 71(3): 782–799.Google Scholar
Jost, John, Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie and Sulloway, Frank. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin, 129(3): 339–375.Google Scholar
Kahne, Joseph, Lee, Nam-Jin and Timpany Feezell, Jessica. 2012. “Digital Media Literacy Education and Online Civic and Political Participation.” International Journal of Communication, 6: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kalmoe, Nathan and Mason, Lilliana. 2019. “Lethal Mass Partisanship: Prevalence, Correlates & Electoral Contingencies.” Paper presented at the National Capital Area Political Science Association American Political Workshop. Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. and Deichert, Maggie. 2020. “Boycotting, Buycotting, and the Psychology of Political Consumerism.” The Journal of Politics, 82(1): 72–88.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. and Palmer, Carl L.. 2008. “Reconsidering the Effects of Education on Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics, 70(3): 612–631.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher and Pope, Jeremy. 2020. American Family Survey Summary Report: Life During a Pandemic. https://media.deseret.com/media/misc/pdf/afs/2020-AFS-Final-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kashdan, Todd B. and Silvia, Paul. 2009. “Curiosity and Interest: The Benefits of Thriving on Novelty and Challenge.” In Lopez, Shane J. and Snider, C.R. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–374.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu. 1957. “The Two Step Flow of Communication: An Up-to-Date Report on an Hypothesis.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1): 67–81.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu and Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyun Suk. 2015. “Attracting Views and Going Viral: How Message Features and News- Sharing Channels Affect Health News Diffusion.” Journal of Communication, 65: 512–534.Google Scholar
Kingzette, Jon. 2020. “Who Do You Loathe? Feelings toward Politicians vs. Ordinary People in the Opposing Party.” Journal of Experimental Political Science. DOI: 10.1017/XPS.2020.9Google Scholar
Kingzette, Jon, Druckman, James N., Klar, Samara, et al. 2021. “How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms.” Public Opinion Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab029Google Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2014. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science, 58(3): 687–704.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna and Ryan, John Barry. 2018. “Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain? Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2): 379–390.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara, Leeper, Thomas and Robison, Joshua. 2020. “Studying Identities with Experiments: Weighing the Risk of Posttreatment Bias against Priming Effects.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 7(1): 56–60.Google Scholar
Klofstad, Casey A. McClurg, Scott D., and Rolfe, Meredith. 2009. “Measurement of Political Discussion Networks: A Comparison of Two ‘Name Generator’ Procedures.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(3): 462–483.Google Scholar
Knight Foundation. 2020. “The 100 Million Project: The Untold Story of American Non-Voters.” https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/The-100-Million-Project_KF_Report_2020.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kozinets, Robert V. 2001. “Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek’s Culture of Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1): 67–88.Google Scholar
Kraft, Patrick W, Krupnikov, Yanna, Milita, Kerri, Ryan, John Barry and Soroka, Stuart. 2020. “Social Media and the Changing Information Environment: Sentiment Differences in Read versus Circulated Content.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1): 195–215.Google Scholar
Krämer, Benjamin and Christina, Peter. 2020. “Exemplification Effects: A Meta-Analysis.” Human Communication Research. 46(2–3): 192–221.Google Scholar
Krauss, Robert M., Chen, Yihsiu, and Chawla, Purnima. 1996. “Nonverbal Behavior and Nonverbal Communication: What do Conversational Hand Gestures Tell Us?” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28: 389–450.Google Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel. 2014. “Seizing the Moment: The Presidential Campaigns’ Use of Twitter During the 2012 Electoral Cycle.” New Media and Society 18(8): 1473–1490.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3): 213–236.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., Narayan, Sowmya, and Smith, Wendy R.. 1996. “Satisficing in Surveys: Initial Evidence.” New Directions for Evaluation, 70: 29–44.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2019. “Overcoming Biases and Bridging Gaps: The Democratic Dilemma’s Perspective of Hope.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4): 634–637.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna and Levine, Adam Seth. 2019. “Political Issues, Evidence, and Citizen Engagement: The Case of Unequal Access to Affordable Health Care.” The Journal of Politics, 81(2): 385–398.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, Nam, H. Hannah and Style, Hillary. 2021. “Convenience Samples in Political Science Experiments.” in Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P. (eds). Advances in Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–183.Google Scholar
Kudrnáč, Aleš and Lyons, Pat. 2017. “Parental Example as Motivation for Turnout among Youths.” Politcal Studies, 65(1): 43–63.Google Scholar
Kubin, Emily, Puryear, Curtis, Schein, Chelsea and Gray, Kurt. 2021 “Personal Experiences Bridge Moral and Political Divides Better than Facts.” PNAS, 118(6): e 2008389118.Google Scholar
Maja, Kutlaca, Martjin, van Zomeren, and Kai, Epstude. 2020. “Friends or Foes? How Activists and Non-Activists Perceive and Evaluate Each Other.” PLoS ONE, 15(4): e0230918, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230918Google Scholar
Kwong, Matt. 2018. “In A Divided US, Therapists Treating Anxiety Are Hearing the Same Name Over and Over: Donald Trump.” CBC.com, July 28: www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-anxiety-disorder-mental-health-political-divide-us-1.4762487Google Scholar
Langmuir, Molly. 2018. “Donald Trump is Destroying My Marriage.” New York Magazine, November 27: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/11/donald-trump-is-destroying-my-marriage.htmlGoogle Scholar
LaRose, Robert. 2010. “The Problem of Media Habits.” Communication Theory, 20: 194–222.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard G., Johnston, Christopher D., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Caitlin E. 2018. “Platform Vulnerabilities: Harassment and Misogynoir in the Digital Attack on Leslie Jones.” Information, Communication & Society, 21: 818–833.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, Andrew M., Mazer, Joseph P., DeGroot, Jocelyn M., et al. 2011. “Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness.” Communication Research, 38(1): 27–53.Google Scholar
Lefevere, Jonas, De Swert, Knut, and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2012. “Effects of Popular Exemplars in Television News.” Communication Research, 39(1): 103–119.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan. 1991. “Participation as a Stimulus of Political Conceptualization.” The Journal of Politics, 53(1): 198–211.Google Scholar
Lerer, Lisa and Herndon, Astead W.. 2020. “Why The Turnout In Iowa Has Some Democrats Worried.” The New York Times, February 10: Section A Page 19.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2016. “(Mis)Perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1): 387–91.Google Scholar
Lewis, Justin and Cushion, Stephen. 2009. “The Thirst To Be First: An Analysis of Breaking News Stories and Their Impact on the Quality of 24-hour News Coverage in the UK.” Journalism Practice, 3(3): 304–318.Google Scholar
Lewis, Justin, Inthorn, Sanna and Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2005. Citizens or Consumers? What the Media Tell Us About Political Participation. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Litman, Jordan A. and Spielberger, Charles D.. 2003. “Measuring Epistemic Curiosity and Its Diversive and Specific Components.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1): 75–86.Google Scholar
Litt, Eden. 2012. “Knock, Knock. Who’s There? The Imagined Audience.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3): 330–345.Google Scholar
Litt, Eden and Hargittai, Eszter. 2016. “The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.” Social Media & Society, 2(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Penelope and Kunda, Ziva. 1997. “Superstars and Me: Predicting the Impact of Role Models on the Self.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1): 91–103.Google Scholar
Lukito, Josephine Jiyoun Suk, Zhang, Yini, Doroshenko, Larissa, Kim, Sang Jung, Su, Min-Hsin, Xia, Yiping, Freelon, Deen, and Wells, Chris. 2020. “The Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: How Russia’s Internet Research Agency Tweets Appeared in U.S. News as Vox Populi.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2): 196–216.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2016. Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew, McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupton, Robert, Smallpage, Steven and Enders, Adam. 2020. “Values and Political Predispositions in the Age of Polarization: Examining the Relationship between Partisanship and Ideology in the United States, 1988–2012.” British Journal of Political Science, 50(1): 241–260.Google Scholar
Ma, Will W. K. and Chan, Albert. 2014. “Knowledge Sharing and Social Media: Altruism, Perceived Online Attachment Motivation, and Perceived Online Relationship Commitment.” Computers in Human Behavior, 39: 51–58.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Amy and Gramer, Robbie. 2019. “In Historic Vote, House Impeaches Trump Over Ukraine Scandal.” Foreign Policy, December 18: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/18/house-representatives-historic-vote-impeach-trump-ukraine/Google Scholar
Mahler, Jonathan. 2016. “In Sunset of the Baby Boom Generation, the Election Reawakens an Old Divide.” The New York Times, November 7: Section A Page 15.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd, Minkoff, Scott L. and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2019. Politics on Display: Yard Signs and the Politicization of Social Spaces. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martherus, James L., Martinez, Andres G., Piff, Paul K., and Theodoridis, Alexander G.. 2021. “Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization.” Political Behavior, 43: 517–540.Google Scholar
Martin, Jonathan and Cohn, Nate. 2016. “Electoral Map a Reality Check to a Trump Bid.” The New York Times, April 3: Section A Page 1.Google Scholar
Martin, Jonathan and Mazzei, Patricia. 2020. “A Tight Trump-Biden Race in Florida: Here Is The State of Play” The New York Times, September 15: Section A Page 1.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E. and boyd, danah. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media and Society, 13: 114–133.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “’I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science, 59(1):128–45.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mazzei, Patricia. 2019. “Impeachment Divides a Nation, a District and a Dinner Table” The New York Times, December 19: Section A Page 20.Google Scholar
Nolan, McCarty, Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
McClendon, Gwyneth H. 2018. Envy in Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McDevitt, Michael. 2018. “Political Socialization and Child Development.” In Outhwaite, William and Turner, Stephen (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology. London: SAGE, pp.797–811.Google Scholar
McDevitt, Michael and Kiousis, Spiro. 2015. “Active Political Parenting: Youth Contributions During Election Campaigns.” Social Science Quarterly, 96(1): 19–33.Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon. 2019. “Social Media as Public Opinion: How Journalists use Social Media to Represent Public Opinion.” Journalism, 20(8): 1070–1086.Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon. 2020. “‘Taking the Temperature of the Room’: How Political Campaigns Use Social Media to Understand and Represent Public Opinion” Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1): 236–256Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon and Logan, Molyneux. 2020. “Twitter’s Influence on News Judgment: An Experiment Among Journalists” Journalism, 21(5)597–613.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Jennifer. 2020. “How Democrats Missed Trump’s Appeal to Latino Voters.” The New York Times, November 9: Section A Page 1.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, McCabe, Katherine and Thal, Adam. 2017. “College Socialization and the Economic Views of Affluent Americans.” American Journal of Political Science, 61(3): 606–623.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, Mérola, Vittorio, Raychaudhuri, Tanika, and Thal, Adam. 2020. “When Poor Students Attend Rich Schools: Do Affluent Social Environments Increase or Decrease Participation?” Perspectives on Politics, 1–17. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592720000699Google Scholar
Meraz, Sharon and Papacharissi, Zizi. 2013. “Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt.” The International Journal of Press/ Politics, 18(2): 138–166.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne and Welch, Eric. 2004. “Civic Generation: Policy Feedback Effects of the GI Bill on Political Involvement over the Life Course.” British Journal of Political Science, 34(3): 497–518.Google Scholar
Milita, Kerri, Ryan, John Barr, and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2014. “Nothing to Hide, Nowhere to Run, or Nothing to Lose: Candidate Position-Taking in Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior, 36(2): 427–449.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1956. On Liberty. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Miller, Kevin P., Brewer, Marilynn B. and Arbuckle, Nathan L.. 2009. “Social Identity Complexity: Its Correlates and Antecedents.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12(1): 79–94.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., Saunders, Kyle, and Farhart, Christina E.. 2016. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.” American Journal of Political Science, 60(4): 824–844.Google Scholar
Mimms, Sarah. 2014. “Chuck Schumer: Passing Obamacare in 2010 Was a Mistake.” The Atlantic, November25: www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/chuck-schumer-passing-obamacare-in-2010-was-a-mistake/449700/Google Scholar
Minozzi, William, Song, Hyunjin, Lazer, David M. J., Neblo, Michael A., and Ognyanova, Katherine. 2020. “The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?” American Journal of Political Science, 64(1): 135–151.Google Scholar
Minson, Julia and Monin, Benoît. 2012. “Do-Gooder Derogation: Disparaging Morally Motivated Minorities to Defuse Anticipated Reproach.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2): 200–207.Google Scholar
Mittal, Banwari. 1995. “A Comparative Analysis of Four Scales of Consumer Involvement.” Psychology & Marketing, 12(7): 663–682.Google Scholar
Molyneux, Logan and McGregor, Shannon C.. 2021. “Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037Google Scholar
Molyneux, Logan and Mourão, Rachel R.. 2019. “Political Journalists’ Normalization of Twitter: Interaction and New Affordances.” Journalism Studies, 20(2): 248–266.Google Scholar
Monin, Benoît, Sawyer, Pamela and Marquez, Michael. 2008. “The Rejection of Moral Rebels: Resenting those Who do the Right Thing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1): 76–93.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob M., Nyhan, Brendan, and Torres, Michelle. 2018. “How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It.” American Journal of Political Science, 62(3): 760–775.Google Scholar
Moore-Berg, Samantha L, Ankori-Karlinsky, Lee-Or, Hameiri, Boaz and Bruneau, Emile. 2020. “Exaggerated Meta-Perceptions Predict Intergroup Hostility between American Political Partisans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26): 14864–14872, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001263117Google Scholar
Morrell, Michael E. 2003. “Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4): 589–602.Google Scholar
Morsbach, Sarah K. and Prinz, Ronald. 2006. “Understanding and Improving the Validity of Self-Report of Parenting.” Clinical Child and Parenting Psychology Review, 9(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Muller, Dominique and Butera, Fabrizio. 2007. “The Focusing Effect of Self-Evaluation Threat in Coaction and Social Comparison.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2): 194–211.Google Scholar
Munar, Ana María and Jacobsen, Jens Kr. Steen. 2014. “Motivations for Sharing Tourism Experiences through Social Media.” Tourism Management, 43: 46–54.Google Scholar
Najle, Mazine and Jones, Robert P.. 2019. “American Democracy in Crisis: The Fate of Pluralism in a Divided Nation.” PRRI Research Report. https://www.prri.org/research/american-democracy-in-crisis-the-fate-of-pluralism-in-a-divided-nation/Google Scholar
Neundorf, Anja, Niemi, Richard, and Smets, Kaat. 2016. “The Compensation Effect of Civic Education on Political Engagement: How Civics Classes Make Up for Missing Parental Socialization.” Political Behavior, 38(4): 921–949.Google Scholar
Neundorf, Anja and Smets, Kaat. 2017. “Political Socialisation and the Making of Citizens” Oxford Handbooks Online. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935307.013.98Google Scholar
Newcomb, Theodore M. 1943. Personality and Social Change; Attitude Formation in a Student Community. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Theodore M., Koenig, Kathryn E., Flacks, Richard, and Warwick, Donald P.. 1967. Persistence and Change: Bennington College and Its Students after Twenty-Five Years. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Craig, Stephen C., and Mattei, Franco. 1991. “Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study.” American Political Science Review, 85(4): 1407–1413.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard and Junn, Jane. 1998. Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2019. “Ideology and Its Discombobulations.” The Journal of Politics, 81(3): e57–e61.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans and Nyhan, Brendan. 2011. “The “Unfriending” Problem: The Consequences of Homophily in Friendship Retention for Causal Estimates of Social Influence.” Social Networks, 33(3): 211–218.Google Scholar
Ognyanova, Katherine. 2020. “Contagious Politics: Tie Strength and the Spread of Political Knowledge.” Communication Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220924179Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric and Wood, Thomas J.. 2014. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science, 58(4): 952–966.Google Scholar
Ondercin, Heather and Lizotte, Mary Kate. 2020. “You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling: How Gender Shapes Affective Polarization.” American Politics Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20972103Google Scholar
Orr, Lilla V. and Huber, Gregory A.. 2020. “The Policy Basis of Measured Partisan Animosity in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 64(3): 569–86.Google Scholar
Ottoni-Wilhelm, Mark, Estell, David B. and Perdue, Neil H.. 2014. “Role-Modeling and Conversations About Giving in the Socialization of Adolescent Charitable Giving and Volunteering.” Journal of Adolescence, 37(1): 53–66.Google Scholar
Oxley, Zoe, Holman, Mirya R., Greenlee, Jill S., Bos, Angela L. and Celeste Lay, J.. 2020. “Children’s Views of the American Presidency.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1): 141–157.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jeremy Dunaway, Johanna L, and Darr, Joshua P. 2019. “As Seen on TV? How Gatekeeping Makes the U.S. House Seem More Extreme.” Journal of Communication, 69 (6): 696–719.Google Scholar
Pajer, Nicole. 2020. “Can Love Survive This Election?” The New York Times, August 25: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/25/fashion/weddings/can-love-relationships-survive-this-election.htmlGoogle Scholar
Panning, Jennifer. 2017. “Trump Anxiety Disorder: The Trump Effect on the Mental Health of Half of the Nation and Special Populations.” In Lee, Bandy, (ed.), The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, pp. 235–243.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2010. A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2012. “Without You, I’m Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter.” International Journal of Communication, 6: 1989–2006.Google Scholar
Park, Crystal L. 2010. “Making Sense of the Meaning Literature: An Integrative Review of Meaning Making and Its Effects on Adjustment to Stressful Life Events.” Psychological Bulletin, 136(2): 257–301.Google Scholar
Park, Chang Sup. 2013. “Does Twitter Motivate Involvement in Politics? Tweeting, Opinion Leadership, and Political Engagement.” Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4): 1641–1648.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher S. and Barreto, Matt A.. 2014. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 1997. “The News Media: An Effective Political Actor?” Political Communication, 14(4): 445–455.Google Scholar
Pegoraro, Ann. 2013. “Sport Fandom in the Digital World.” In Pederson, Paul M., (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Sport Communication. Routledge, pp. 248–258.Google Scholar
Penney, Joel. 2016. “Motivations for Participating in ‘Viral Politics’: A Qualitative Case Study of Twitter Users and the 2012 US Presidential Election.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(1): 71–87.Google Scholar
Perry, Gina. 2018. The Lost Boys: Inside Muzafer Sherif’s Robbers Cave Experiment. London, UK: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
Petersen, Michael Bang and Lene, Aarøe. 2013. “Politics in the Mind’s Eye: Imagination as a Link between Social and Political Cognition.” American Political Science Review, 107(2): 275–293.Google Scholar
Pew 2019. “National Politics on Twitter Small Share of U.S. Adults Produce Majority of Tweets.” Pew Report. www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/10/23/national-politics-on-twitter-small-share-of-u-s-adults-produce-majority-of-tweets/#those-who-tweet-about-politics-differ-from-those-who-avoid-the-topic-or-tweet-infrequentlyGoogle Scholar
Peyton, Kyle, Huber, Gregory and Coppock, Alexander. 2020. “The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During The COVID-19 Pandemic.” Working Paper: 10.31235/osf.io/s45ygGoogle Scholar
Pietryka, Matthew T. and DeBats, Donald A.. 2017. “It’s Not Just What You Have, but Who You Know: Networks, Social Proximity to Elites, and Voting in State and Local Elections.” American Political Science Review, 111(2): 360–378.Google Scholar
Preece, Jessica. 2016. “Mind the Gender Gap: An Experiment on the Influence of Self-Efficacy on Political Interest.” Politics & Gender, 12(1): 198–217.Google Scholar
Pressgrove, Geah, Weberling McKeever, Brooke and Jang, S. Mo. 2018. “What is Contagious? Exploring Why Content Goes Viral on Twitter: A case study of the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23: e1586.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality In Political Involvement and Polarizes the Electorate. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2010. “You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest Over the Life Cycle.” The Journal of Politics, 72(3): 747–766.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2019. Hooked: How Politics Captures People’s Interest. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian W. 1959. “Political Modernization and Research on the Process of Political Socialization.” Items, 13: 25–28.Google Scholar
Quinn, Kelly. 2016. “Contextual Social Capital: Linking the Contexts of Social Media Use to Its Outcomes.” Information, Communication & Society, 19(5): 582–600.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee and Wellman, Barry. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Raychaudhuri, Tanika. 2018. “The Social Roots of Asian American Partisan Attitudes.” Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(3): 389–410.Google Scholar
Renninger, Ann and Hidi, Suzanne, 2011. “Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement and Generation of Interest.” Educational Psychologist, 46(3): 168–184.Google Scholar
Riesman, David and Glazer, Nathan. 1950. “Criteria for Political Apathy.” In Gouldner, Alvin W., (ed.), Studies in Leadership. New York: Harper and Brothers, pp. 505–559.Google Scholar
Robinson, Sue, Yiping, Xia and Zahay, Megan. 2019. “Public Political Talk on Twitter and Facebook: The View from Journalists.” Knight Foundation Report. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/KF-Twitter-Report-Part2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Robison, Joshua and Mullinix, Kevin J. 2016. “Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization is Communicated and Its Effects.” Political Communication, 33(2): 261–282.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jon and Sutherland, Joseph. 2016. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.” Political Behavior, 38(3): 485–508.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Howard and Feldman, Charles. 2008. No Time To Think: The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Stephen J. and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew R. N. and Delia, Dumitrescu. 2019. “’Vox Twitterati’ Investigating the Effects of Social Media Exemplars in Online News Articles.” New Media & Society, 21(4): 962–983.Google Scholar
Rubin, Bonnie Miller. 2020. “A Lesson in Civics or Indoctrination? Deciding Whether to Bring Kids to Political Protests.” The Washington Post, March 5: www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2020/03/05/lesson-civics-or-indoctrination-deciding-whether-bring-kids-political-protests/Google Scholar
Rubin, Rebecca, Perse, Elizabeth M. and Barbato, Carole E.. 1988. “Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Motives.” Human Communication Research, 14(4): 602–628.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J., Gangl, Amy, and Stevens, Dan. 2000. “The Effects of Efficacy and Emotions on Campaign Involvement.” The Journal of Politics, 62(4): 1189–1197.Google Scholar
Rudy, Duane and Grusec, Joan E.. 2001. “Correlates of Authoritarian Parenting in Individualist and Collectivist Cultures and Implications for Understanding the Transmission of Values.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2): 202–212.Google Scholar
Russo, Silvia and Stattin, Håkan. 2017. “Stability and Change in Youth’s Political Interest.” Social Indicators Research, 132(2): 643–658.Google Scholar
Ryan, John Barry. 2011. “Accuracy and Bias in Perceptions of Political Knowledge.” Political Behavior, 33(2): 335–356.Google Scholar
Saleem, Hajra, Rahman, Jawaria, Aslam, Nida, Murtazaliev, Salikh and Khan, Safeera. 2020. “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Children: Vulnerable or Spared? A Systematic Review.” Cureus, 12(5): e8207.Google Scholar
Sanger-Katz, Margot. 2020 “On Coronavirus, Americans Still Trust the Experts.” New York Times, June 27: www.nytimes.com/2020/06/27/upshot/coronavirus-americans-trust-experts.html#:~:text=In%20the%20Times%20survey%2C%2084,and%2083%20percent%20among%20Democrats.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 2004. “Not Your Parents’ Political Socialization: Introduction for a New Generation.” Annual Review of Political Science, 7: 1–23.Google Scholar
Shulman, Hillary C. and Levine, Timothy R.. 2012. “Exploring Social Norms as a Group‐Level Phenomenon: Do Political Participation Norms Exist and Influence Political Participation on College Campuses?” Journal of Communication, 62(3): 532–552.Google Scholar
Schulz, William Small, Guess, Andrew M., Barberá, Pablo, et al. 2021. “(Mis)representing Ideology on Twitter: How Social Influence Shapes Online Political Expression.” Working Paper available at https://csdp.princeton.edu/sites/csdp/files/media/schulzguess_spirals_csdp.pdfGoogle Scholar
Segesten, Anamaria Dutceac and Bossetta, Michael. 2017. “A Typology of Political Participation Online: How Citizens used Twitter to Mobilize during the 2015 British General Elections.” Information, Communication & Society, 20(11): 1625–1643.Google Scholar
Seregina, Anastasia and Schouten, John W.. 2017. “Resolving Identity Ambiguity through Transcending Fandom.” Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(2): 107–130.Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime E. 2018. Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime and Carlson, Taylor. 2019. “Opting Out of Political Discussion.” Political Communication, 36(3): 476–496.Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, Harvey, O. J., Jack White, B., Hood, William R. and Sherif, Carolyn W.. 1988. The Robber’s Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Silvia, Paul. 2005. “What is Interesting? Exploring the Appraisal Structure of Interest.” Emotion, 5(1): 89–102.Google Scholar
Smith, Glen and Kathleen, Searles. 2014. “Who Let the (Attack) Dogs Out? New Evidence for Partisan Media Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1): 71–99.Google Scholar
Sokhey, Anand E. and Djupe, Paul A.. 2011. “Interpersonal Networks and Democratic Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(1): 55–59.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. 2012. “The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World.” The Journal of Politics 74(2): 514–528.Google Scholar
Spears, Russel, Doosje, Bertjan and Ellemers, Naomi. 1997. “Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: the Role of Group Identification.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23: 538–553Google Scholar
Spry, Amber. 2018. Identity in American Politics: A Multidimensional Approach to Study and Measurement. Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Standage, Tom. 2013. Writing on the Wall: Social Media – the First 2,000 Years. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stewart, Emily. 2019. “The Incredibly Absurd Trump/CNN SharpieGate Feud, Explained.” Vox.com, September 6: www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/6/20851971/trump-hurricane-dorian-alabama-sharpie-cnn-mediaGoogle Scholar
Stockton, Nick. 2017. “The New FOMO: Who Cares About My Friends? I’m Missing the News.” Wired Magazine, September: www.wired.com/2017/08/fomo/.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura and Bass, Jackie. 2011. “Political Socialization: Ongoing Questions and New Directions.” In Edwards III, George C., Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 453–470.Google Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper, Djerf-Pierre, Monika and Shehata, Adam (2013). “The Dynamics of Political Interest and News Media Consumption: A Longitudinal Perspective” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4): 414–435.Google Scholar
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2002. “New Voices in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Interpersonal and Online Political Talk.” Javnost-The Public, 9(2): 23–41.Google Scholar
Strother, Logan, Piston, Spencer, Golberstein, Ezra, Gollust, Sarah E. and Eisenberg, Daniel. 2021. “College Roommates have a Modest but Significant Influence on Each Other’s Political Ideology.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(2): e2015514117.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry, Martin, René and Wheeler, Ladd. 2002. “Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect?” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5): 159–163.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2): 175–195.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S. and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science, 50(3): 755–769.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jessica. 2017. “Republicans and Democrats Don’t Agree, Or Like Each Other – And its Worse Than Ever.” NPR, October 5: https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/555685136/republicans-and-democrats-dont-agree-dont-like-each-other-and-its-worst-than-eveGoogle Scholar
Tavernise, Sabrina and Cohn, Nate. 2019. “Moderate Majority with Other Things to Worry About.” The New York Times, September 24: Section A Page 11.Google Scholar
Thomas, Nancy and Brower, Margaret. 2017. “Politics 365: Fostering Campus Climates for Student Political Learning & Engagement” Institute for Democracy and Higher Education Report. https://tischcollege.tufts.edu/sites/default/files/Politics%20365.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dondrea. 2002. “The Politics of Display or the Display of Politics? Cultural Policy and the Museo del Hombre Dominicano.” Museum Anthropology, 25(2): 38–49.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle. 2017. Opting Out of Congress: Partisan Polarization and the Decline of Moderate Candidates. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson-DeVeaux, Amelia, Mithani, Jasmine, and Bronner, Laura. 2020. “Why Many Americans Don’t Vote: And Why for Some, This Year Could Be Different.” Five Thirty Eight, October 26: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/non-voters-poll-2020-election/Google Scholar
Thorne, Scott and Bruner, Gordon C.. 2006. “An Exploratory Investigation of the Characteristics of Consumer Fanaticism” Qualitative Market Research, 9(1): 51–72.Google Scholar
Thorson, Emily. 2014. “Beyond Opinion Leaders: How Attempts to Persuade Foster Political Awareness and Campaign Learning.” Communication Research, 41(3): 353–374.Google Scholar
Toff, Benjamin J. 2016. The Blind Scorekeepers: Journalism, Polling, and the Battle to Define Public Opinion in American Politics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Torre, Jared B. and Lieberman, Matthew D.. 2018. “Putting Feelings Into Words: Affect Labeling as Implicit Emotion Regulation.” Emotion Review, 10(2): 116–124.Google Scholar
Trussler, Marc and Stuart, Soroka. 2014. “Consumer Demand for Cynical and Negative News Frames.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3): 360–379.Google Scholar
Turner, John C. and Reynolds, Katherine. 2012. “Self-Categorization Theory.” In Van Lange, Paul, Kruglanski, Arie and Higgins, E. Tory (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume Two. London: SAGE, pp. 399–417.Google Scholar
Turner, Julius. 1951. “Responsible Parties: A Dissent from the Floor.” American Political Science Review, 45(1): 143–152.Google Scholar
Tworek, Heidi. 2018. “Tweets are the New Vox Populi.” Columbia Journalism Review, March 27: https://www.cjr.org/analysis/tweets-media.phpGoogle Scholar
Usher, Nikki and Margaret, Yee Man Ng. 2020. “Sharing Knowledge and ‘Microbubbles’: Epistemic Communities.” Social Media + Society, 6(2): https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926639Google Scholar
Usher, Nikki, Holcomb, Jesse, and Littman, Justin. 2018. “Twitter Makes it Worse: Political Journalists, Gendered Echo Chambers, and the Amplification of Gender Bias.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(3): 324–344.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas, Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Groenendyk, Eric W.. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior, 31(3): 307–330.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, Jay J., Reinero, Diego A., Spring, Victoria, Harris, Elizabeth A., and Duke, Annie. 2021. “Speaking My Truth: Why Personal Experiences can Bridge Divides but Mislead.” PNAS, 118(8): e2100280118.Google Scholar
van Deth, Jan W., Abendschön, Simone and Vollmar, Meike. 2011. “Children and Politics: An Empirical Reassessment of Early Political Socialization.” Political Psychology 32(1): 147–174.Google Scholar
Van Duyn, Emily. 2018. “Hidden Democracy: Political Dissent in Rural America.” Journal of Communication, 68: 965–987.Google Scholar
Vázquez-Arroyo, Antonio Y. 2013. “How Not to Learn From Catastrophe: Habermas, Critical Theory and the ‘Catastrophization’ of Political Life.” Political Theory, 41(5): 738–765.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vromen, Ariadne, Xenos, Michael Andrew and Loader, Brian. 2013. The Civic Network: A Comparative Study of the Use of Social Media for Enhancing Young People’s Political Engagement, Australia, United Kingdom, & United States. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018–05–04. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37023.v1Google Scholar
Wagner, Claudia, Liao, Vera, Pirolli, Peter, Nelson, Les and Strohmaier, Markus. 2012. “It’s Not in Their Tweets: Modeling Topical Expertise of Twitter Users.” International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing, Amsterdam, pp. 91–100, DOI: 10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.30.Google Scholar
Wakefield Research Study. 2017. “The Trump Effect on American Relationships.” www.wakefieldresearch.com/blog/2017/05/10/new-wakefield-research-study-trump-effect-american-relationshipsGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Julian. 2018. “Modelling Contemporary Gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination.” Digital Journalism, 6(3): 274–293.Google Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Kathryn. 2019 “Trump Displays Seemingly Edited Map of Hurricane Dorian Projected Path.” CBS News, September 4: www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-hurricane-map-briefing-today-shows-dorian-tracker-seemingly-altered-with-black-pen-or-sharpie-marker-2019-09-04/Google Scholar
Weaver, David H., Willnat, Lars and Wilhoit, G. Cleveland. 2019. “The American Journalist in the Digital Age: Another Look at U.S. News People.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1): 101–130.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven. 2020. American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven and Abramowitz, Alan. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research, 45(4): 621–647.Google Scholar
Weinschenk, Aaron and Dawes, Christopher. 2021. “Civic Education in High School and Voter Turnout in Adulthood.” British Journal of Political Science, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000435Google Scholar
Wells, Chris, Zhang, Yini, Lukito, Josephine and Pevehouse, Jon C. W.. 2020. “Modeling the Formation of Attentive Publics in Social Media: The Case of Donald Trump.” Mass Communication and Society, 23(2): 181–205.Google Scholar
West, Emily A. and Iyengar, Shanto. 2020. “Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization.” Political Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09637-yGoogle Scholar
Westwood, Sean, Messing, Solomon, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2020. “Projecting Confidence: How the Probabilistic Horse Race Confuses and Demobilizes the Public” The Journal of Politics 82:4, 1530–1544.Google Scholar
Westwood, Sean J. and Peterson, Erik. 2020. “The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States.” Political Behavior, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-020-09648-9Google Scholar
Westwood, Sean J., Peterson, Erik, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2019. “Are There Still Limits on Partisan Prejudice?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3): 584–597.Google Scholar
White, Ismail and Laird, Chryl. 2020. Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whitesides, John. 2017. “From Disputes to a Breakup -- Wounds Still Raw After U.S. Election.” Reuters, February 7: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-trump-relationships-insight-idUKKBN15M13PGoogle Scholar
Williams, Rebecca. 2013. “‘Anyone who Calls Muse a Twilight Band will be Shot on Sight’: Music, Distinction, and the `Interloping Fan’ in the Twilight Franchise.” Popular Music and Society, 36(3): 327–342.Google Scholar
Wojcik, Stefan and Hughes, Adam. 2019. “Sizing Up Twitter Users.” Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2019/04/twitter_opinions_4_18_final_clean.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2009. “Explaining Change in Party Identification in Adolescence.” Electoral Studies, 28(4): 575–583.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2020a. Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2020b. “Conflict Avoidance and Gender Gaps in Political Engagement.” Political Behavior. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-020-09614-5Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer and Stapleton, Carey E.. 2020. “Self-Esteem and the Development of Partisan Identity.” Political Research Quarterly, 73(3): 609–622.Google Scholar
Woudstra, Kristy. 2017. “Why I won’t take my kids to protests” Today’s Parent. www.todaysparent.com/family/parenting/why-i-wont-take-my-kids-to-protests/Google Scholar
Xia, Yiping, Robinson, Sue, Zahay, Megan and Freelon, Deen. 2020 “The Evolving Journalistic Roles on Social Media: Exploring ‘Engagement’ as Relationship Building between Journalists and Citizens” Journalism Practice, 14(5): 556–573Google Scholar
Xu, Weiai Wayne and Feng, Miao. 2014. “Talking to the Broadcasters on Twitter: Networked Gatekeeping in Twitter Conversations with Journalists.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(3): 420–437.Google Scholar
Yair, Omer. 2020. “A Note on the Affective Polarization Literature.” Working paper available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3771264.Google Scholar
Yoo, Sung Woo, Kim, Ji Won, and de Zúñiga, Homero Gil. 2017. “Cognitive Benefits for Senders: Antecedents and Effects of Political Expression on Social Media.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1): 17–37.Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf and Hans-Bernd, Brosius. 2000. Exemplification in Communication: The Influence of Case Reports on the Perception of Issues. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zink, James. 2009. “The Language of Liberty and Law: James Wilson on America’s Written Constitution.” American Political Science Review, 103(3): 442–455.Google Scholar
Zmigrod, Leor, Rentfrow, Peter Jason and Robbins, Trevor. 2019. “The Partisan Mind: Is Extreme Political Partisanship Related to Cognitive Inflexibility?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000661Google Scholar
Zweig, David. 2020. “Are COVID Patients Gasping ‘It Isn’t Real’ As They Die?” Wired, November 19: www.wired.com/story/are-covid-patients-gasping-it-isnt-real-as-they-die/Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×