Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T19:36:03.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Temperament, Socioemotional Functioning, and Peer Relationships in Chinese and North American Children

from Part II - Temperamental and Emotional Influences on Peer Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

By
Xinyin Chen ,
Li Wang  and
Amanda DeSouza
Edited by
Xinyin Chen ,
Doran C. French  and
Barry H. Schneider
Xinyin Chen
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada
Li Wang
Affiliation:
Peking University Beijing, P.R. China
Amanda DeSouza
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada
Xinyin Chen
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Doran C. French
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University
Barry H. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

Temperamental characteristics may play a significant role in the development of social competence and adjustment. Support for this belief comes from a number of studies in North America and Western Europe (see Kagan, 1989, and Rothbart & Bates, 1998 for comprehensive reviews). Nevertheless, the impact of temperamental factors on development takes place in cultural context. Culture may influence the display of personal traits and the way in which they contribute to adaptive and maladaptive functioning. During development, temperament and culture interact, which may lead to different developmental patterns and outcomes of certain dispositional characteristics, such as sociability and shyness, across cultural contexts. The mechanism for the temperament–culture interaction mainly involves the socialization process, such as culturally directed social interpretations and responses in children's relationships with adults and peers (Chen, 2000). Social judgments, evaluations, and responses determine, to a large extent, the functional “meanings” of the characteristics and their effect on individual behavior and adjustment status. Children may actively engage in the processes through their participation in endorsing, transforming, and constructing cultural norms and values in social interactions.

In this chapter, we focus on the relations between temperament and peer interactions and relationships in Chinese and North American children. We first describe a conceptual model concerning some basic dimensions of temperament, social functioning, and cultural context. We then discuss major socioemotional characteristics, particularly shyness–inhibition, in Chinese and Western cultures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Peer Relationships in Cultural Context , pp. 123 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asendorpf, J. (1990). Beyond social withdrawal: Shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Human Development, 33, 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asendorpf, J. (1991). Development of inhibited children's coping with unfamiliarity. Child Development, 62, 1460–1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R. (1934). Anthropology and the abnormal. Journal of General Psychology, 10, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, B., & Logan, A. (1995). Links between communication patterns in mother-child, father-child, and child-peer interactions and children's social status. Child Development, 66, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (1995). Form and function: Implications for studies of culture and human development. Culture and Psychology, 1(1), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: Present and future. In Bolger, N., Caspi, A., Downey, G., & Moorehouse, M. (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes (pp. 25–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Lerner, R. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cai, X., & Wu, P. (1999). A study of the modernity of social concept of younger students in China. Psychological Science (China), 22, 148–152.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). Discipline and child compliance. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol 4. Applied and practical parenting (pp. 205–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chan, J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1981, August). National differences in personality: Hong Kong and England. Paper presented at the joint IACCP-ICP Asian Regional Meeting, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, R. K. (1995). Chinese and European American cultural models of the self reflected in mothers' childrearing beliefs. Ethos, 23, 328–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. (2000). Social and emotional development in Chinese children and adolescents: A contextual cross-cultural perspective. In Columbus, F. (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. I, pp. 229–251). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Cen, G., Li, D., & He, Y. (2005). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: The imprint of historical time. Child Development, 76, 182–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Chang, L., & He, Y. (2003). The peer group as a context: Mediating and moderating effects on the relations between academic achievement and social functioning in Chinese children. Child Development, 74, 710–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Chen, H., & Kaspar, V. (2001). Group social functioning and individual socio-emotional and school adjustment in Chinese children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 264–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Dong, Q., & Zhou, H. (1997). Authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices and social and school adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 855–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Hastings, P., Rubin, K. H., Chen, H., Cen, G., & Stewart, S. L. (1998). Childrearing attitudes and behavioral inhibition in Chinese and Canadian toddlers: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 34, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Li, D., Li, Z., Li, B., & Liu, M. (2000). Sociable and prosocial dimensions of social competence in Chinese children: Common and unique contributions to social, academic and psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 36, 302–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Liu, M., Rubin, K. H., Cen, G., Gao, X., & Li, D. (2002). Sociability and prosocial orientation as predictors of youth adjustment: A seven-year longitudinal study in a Chinese sample. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Li, B. (1995a). Social and school adjustment of shy and aggressive children in China. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Li, Z. (1995b). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 31, 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., Li, B., & Li, Z. (1999). Adolescent outcomes of social functioning in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 23, 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., Liu, M., Chen, H., Wang, L., Li, D.. (2003). Compliance in Chinese and Canadian toddlers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Wang, L., Chen, H., & Liu, M. (2002). Noncompliance and childrearing attitudes as predictors of aggressive behavior: A longitudinal study in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Wu, H., Chen, H., Wang, L., & Cen, G. (2001). Parenting practices and aggressive behavior in Chinese children. Parenting: Science and Practice, 1, 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cillessen, A. H., Ijzendoorn, H. W., Lieshout, C. F., & Hartup, W. W. (1992). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys: Subtypes and stabilities. Child Development, 63, 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions of types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 783–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coie, J. D., & Kupersmidt, J. (1983). A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys' groups. Child Development, 54, 1400–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting. American Psychologist, 55, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, L. A., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2000). Negotiating adolescence in times of social change. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeRosier, M., Kupersmidt, J., & Patterson, C. (1994). Children's academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development, 65, 1799–1813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeSouza, A., & Chen, X. (2002, July). Social initiative and responses of shy and non-shy children in China and Canada. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development (ISSBD), Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Petit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51(2, Serial No. 213).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Schlundt, D. C., Schocken, I., & Delugach, J. D. (1983). Social competence and children's sociometric status: The role of peer group entry strategies. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 309–336.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. P. (1995). Parenting toddlers. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol 1. Children and parenting (pp. 41–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course and human development. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Lerner, R. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 939–991). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Feng, Y. L. (1962). The spirit of Chinese philosophy. London: Routledge, & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Fox, N., Rubin, K. H., Calkins, S., Marshall, T. R., Coplan, R. J., Porges, S. W.. (1995). Frontal activation asymmetry and social competence at four years of age. Child Development, 66, 1770–1784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, D. G., & Freedman, M. (1969). Behavioral differences between Chinese-American and American newborns. Nature, 224, 1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furman, W., & Robbins, P. (1985). What's the point? Issues in the selection of treatment objectives. In Schneider, B. H., Rubin, K. H., & Ledingham, J. E. (Eds.), Children's peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 41–54). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1992). Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist, 44, 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1987). Individuals, relationships and culture. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1995). Individuals and culture. In Changeux, J. P. & Chavaillon, J. (Eds), Origins of the human brain (pp. 186–199). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. (1986). Chinese pattern of socialization: A critical review. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 1–37). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, M. (1999). A comparative study of the value outlook of Chinese adolescent students. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 25, 83–88.Google Scholar
Hymel, S., Rubin, K. H., Rowden, L., & LeMare, L. (1990). Children's peer relationships: Longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development, 61, 2004–2021.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1989). Temperamental contributions to social behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, J. (1998). Temperament and the reactions to unfamiliarity. Child Development, 68, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1978). Infancy: Its place in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kobayashi-Winata, H., & Power, T. G. (1989). Child rearing and compliance: Japanese and American families in Houston. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanska, G., & Aksan, N. (1995). Mother-child mutually positive affect, the quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions, and maternal control as correlates of early internalization. Child Development, 66, 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanska, G., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1992). Early childhood inhibition and the dynamics of the child's interaction with an unfamiliar peer at age five. Child Development, 63, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriger, S. F., & Kroes, W. H. (1972). Child-rearing attitudes of Chinese, Jewish, and Protestant mothers. Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczynski, L., & Kochanska, G. (1990). Development of children's noncompliance strategies from toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology, 26, 398–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. W. (1999). The uses of loneliness in adolescence. In Rotenberg, K. J. & Hymel, S. (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 244–262). New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, S. (1987). The outline of Chinese culture. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Teachers' University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C., & Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61, 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., Zheng, S., Cui, L., Li, D., Chen, H., & Wang, Li. (in press). Autonomy- vs. connectedness-oriented parenting behaviors in Chinese and Canadian mothers. International Journal of Behavioral Development.Google Scholar
Luo, G. (1996). Chinese traditional social and moral ideas and rules. Beijing, China: University of Chinese People Press.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, C. N. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Hetherington, E. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.4. Socialization, personality and social development (pp. 1–102). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miyake, K., Chen, S. J., & Campos., J. J. (1985). Infant temperament, mother's mode of interactions, and attachment in Japan: An interim report. In Bretherton, I. & Waters, E. (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1–2, Serial No. 209), 276–297.Google Scholar
Mizuta, I., Zahn-Waxler, C., Cole, P. M., & Hiruma, N. (1996). A cross-cultural study of preschoolers' attachment: Security and sensitivity in Japanese and US dyads. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 141–159.Google Scholar
Ollendick, T. H., Ross, W. G., Weist, M. D., & Oswald, D. P. (1990). The predictive validity of teacher nominations: A five-year followup of at-risk youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 699–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Putallaz, M., & Gottman, J. M. (1981). Social skills and group acceptance. In Asher, S. R. & Gottman, J. M. (Eds.), The development of children's friendships (pp. 116–149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. (Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 105–176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H. (1989). The Play Observation Scale. Waterloo, Canada:University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., & Asendorpf, J. (1993). Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Damon, W. (Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 619–700). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Burgess, K. B., & Coplan, R. J. (2002). Social withdrawal and shyness. In Smith, P. K. & Hart, C. H. Craig (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 330–352), Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Chen, X., McDougall, P., Bowker, A., & McKinnon, J. (1995). The Waterloo Longitudinal Project: Predicting internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (1995). Emotionality, emotion regulation, and preschoolers' social adaptation. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K. H., & Krasnor, L. R. (1986). Social cognitive and social behavioral perspectives on problem-solving. In Perlmutter, M. (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 1–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Stewart, S. L., & Chen, X. (1995). The parents of aggressive and withdrawn children. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. I. How children influence parenting (pp. 255–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R. (2000). The early experience assumption: Past, present and future. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, L. A., & Fox, N. A. (1998). The development and outcomes of childhood shyness: A multiple psychophysiologic measure approach. In Vasta, R. (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 13, pp. 13–47). London: Kingsley.Google Scholar
Silbereisen, R. K. (2000). German unification and adolescents' developmental timetables: Continuities and discontinuities. In Crockett, L. A., & Silbereisen, R. K. (Eds), Negotiating adolescence in times of social change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson-Hinde, J., & Shouldice, A. (1993). Wariness to strangers: A behavior systems perspective revisited. In Rubin, Ke H. & Asendorpf, J. (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 101–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 106–170). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. W. (2000). Transforming China: Economic reform and its political implications. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Q, Eisenberg, N., Wang, Y., & Reiser, M. (2004). Chinese children's effortful control and dispositional anger/frustration: Relations to parenting styles and children's social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 40, 352–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×