Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:08:15.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - From Ronald S. Burt, Structural Holes

from III - Later Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2021

Mario L. Small
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Brea L. Perry
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Bernice Pescosolido
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Edward B. Smith
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

This is an overview of the foundation for, and substance of, emerging research on network broker behavior, research that constitutes a second generation of work on network brokerage. I begin with a capstone of key past results along with my cautions and enthusiasms about directions in which things are going. I discuss the information breadth, timing, and arbitrage advantages of network brokers, and returns to those advantages contingent on a broker’s social standing. Research linking network structure with success has been a first generation of work. That work is well advanced, but far from complete. I discuss the current position becoming stronger and broader with replication, attention to negative results, and attention to dynamics. Shifting to an exciting second generation of work, research has emerged focused on the behavior by which broker advantage is linked with success. I discuss framing and frame shifts, the importance of personal engagement, the uncertain moderating effects of culture and personality, and a few behavioral variations in brokerage. I discuss the context dependence of tertius gaudens tactics iungens versus separans, and the distinction between brokers who consume versus produce emotional energy in their colleagues.

Type
Chapter
Information
Personal Networks
Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis
, pp. 371 - 383
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkey, Karen. 1991. “Rebellious Alliances: The State and Peasant Unrest in Early Seventeenth Century France and the Ottoman Empire.American Sociological Review 56: 699715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1990. “Kinds of Relations in American Discussion Networks,” pp. 411–51 in Structures of Power and Constraint, edited by Calhoun, C., Meyer, M. W., and Scott, W. R.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caves, Richard E. 1982. American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Coser, Rose Laub. 1975. “The Complexity of Roles as a Seedbed of Individual Autonomy,” pp. 237–63 in The Idea of Social Structure, edited by Coser, L. A.. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon, Schachter, Stanley, and Back, Kurt W.. 1950. Social Pressures in Informal Groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter V., and Hurlbert, Jeanne S.. 1988. “Social Resources and Mobility Outcomes: A Replication and Extension.Social Forces 67: 1038–59.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. [1957] 1968. “Continuities in the Theory of Reference Group Behavior,” pp. 335440 in Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1902. “The Number of Members as Determining the Sociological Form of the Group, II.” Translated by A. Small. American Journal of Sociology 8: 158–96.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. [1922] 1955. Conflict and Web of Group Affiliations. Translated by K. H. Wolff and R. Bendix. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. [1923] 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited and translated by K. H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 1970. Chains of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Harrison C., Boorman, Scott, and Breiger, Ronald L.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions. American Journal of Sociology 81: 730–80.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×