Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:31:11.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Array Signal Processing, Calibration, and Beamforming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2018

Karl F. Warnick
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Rob Maaskant
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
Marianna V. Ivashina
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
David B. Davidson
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Perth
Brian D. Jeffs
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

The general disciplines of calibrating phased arrays, constructing beam weighting coefficients, and performing computations on the output signals from a phased array system, all belong to broad field known as array signal processing. Basic topics from array signal processing, as well as advanced topics such as radio frequency interference mitigation, are surveyed in this chapter. For phased arrays used in demanding applications like radio astronomy, a priori array calibration methods generally are insufficiently accurate. In practice, array calibration generally involves measured signal responses or correlations with bright sources, so calibration is included here in the same treatment as beamforming and signal processing.

Beamforming

In the context of antenna array receivers, beamforming is the process of linearly weighting and combining signals from array elements in order to form a desired spatial response pattern. An example of response pattern is shown in Fig. 10.1. Beamforming can be viewed as spatial filtering where the discrete-in-space samples of the propagating wavefront (i.e., the outputs of the distinct antenna elements of the array, each in a different position) are used as inputs to a linear filter. Typically the beamformer is designed by adjusting the element weights to achieve higher gain, directivity, sensitivity, and signal to noise ratio than is possible from any single array antenna element. In the process, the high gain field of view is narrowed to a relatively small directional region know as the beam main lobe, or simply the beam. The lower response peaks outside this main lobe region are undesirable artifacts of the beamforming process and are pattern sidelobes.

Beams may be steered to a desired direction by inserting time delays in the signal path of each element to compensate for differential propagation delays across the array for wavefronts arriving from that direction. These time aligned signals sum coherently in the beamformer and so higher gain is achieved in the desired steering direction. For narrowband signals this steering time delay may be replaced by simply multiplying element signal streams by the equivalent complex phase shift ejωkτi where ωk is the narrowband subband center radian frequency for the kth channel and τi is the alignment time delay correction for the ith element (this is equivalent to the phase shift derived in Sec. 4.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] B. Van, Veen and K. M., Buckley, “Beamforming: A versatile approach to spatial filtering,” IEEE ASSP Mag., pp. 4–24, Apr. 1988.Google Scholar
[2] A. V., Oppenheim and R. W., Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, 2009.Google Scholar
[3] C., Harris and K., Haines, “A mathematical review of polyphase filterbank implementations for radio astronomy,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 317–322, 2011.Google Scholar
[4] B., Jeffs, K., Warnick, J., Landon, et al., “Signal processing for phased array feeds in radio astronomical telescopes,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 635–646, Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
[5] IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas, IEEE Std 145-2013.
[6] K. F., Warnick and B. D., Jeffs, “Gain and aperture efficiency for a reflector antenna with an array feed,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 5, p. 499, 2006.
[7] J., Landon, B. D., Jeffs, and K. F., Warnick, “Model-based subspace projection beamforming for deep interference nulling,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1215–1228, 2012.Google Scholar
[8] M., Elmer, B. D., Jeffs, K. F., Warnick, J. R., Fisher, and R. D., Norrod, “Beamformer design methods for radio astronomical phased array feeds,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 903–914, 2012.Google Scholar
[9] M., Elmer, B., Jeffs, and K., Warnick, “Long-term calibration stability of a radio astronomical phased array feed,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 145, Jan. 2013.
[10] M., Elmer, B., Jeffs, and K., Warnick, “Reducing relative beam variations for phased array feed imaging of radio astronomical sources,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 6067–6068, Sep. 2014.Google Scholar
[11] A. R., Thompson, J. M., Moran, and G. W., Swenson, Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, 3rd edn. New York: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
[12] Frederic J., Harris, “On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 51–83, Jan. 1978.Google Scholar
[13] H. Van, Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part IV, Optimum Array Processing. John Wiley and Sons, 2002.Google Scholar
[14] J. W., Wallace and M. A., Jensen, “Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems: A rigorous network theory analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1317–1325, 2004.Google Scholar
[15] C. E., Shannon and W., Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, 1998.Google Scholar
[16] E., Telatar, “Capacity of multi-antenna gaussian channels,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 585–595, 1999.Google Scholar
[17] J. D., Bunton and S. G., Hay, “Achievable field of view of chequerboard phased array feed,” in Proc. International Conference on Electromagnetics and Applications (ICEAA), 2010, pp. 728–730.Google Scholar
[18] S., Hay and T., Bird, “Applications of phased array feeders in reflector antennas,” in Handbook of Antenna Technologies, Z. N., Chen, D., Liu, H., Nakano, X., Qing, and T., Zwick, Eds., New York: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
[19] K. F., Warnick, M. V., Ivashina, S. J., Wijnholds, and R., Maaskant, “Polarimetry with phased array antennas: Theoretical framework and definitions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 184–196, 2012.Google Scholar
[20] J. P., Hamaker, J. D., Bregman, and R. J., Sault, “Understanding radio polarimetry –I. Mathematical foundations,” Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, no. 117, pp. 137–147, Ma. 1996.Google Scholar
[21] A., Ludwig, “The definition of cross polarization,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 116–119, Jan. 1973.Google Scholar
[22] O., Smirnov, “Revisiting the radio interferometer measurement equation. I. a full-sky Jones formalism,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 527, 2011, issn: 0004-6361.
[23] T., Carozzi, “A fundamental figure of merit for radio polarimeters,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2058–2065, Jun. 2011.Google Scholar
[24] R. J., Sault, J. P., Hamaker, and J. D., Bregman, “Understanding radio polarimetry –II. instrumental calibration of an interferometer array,” Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series, no. 117, pp. 149–159, Ma. 1996.Google Scholar
[25] H. C.v. d., Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles. New York: Dover Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
[26] R. J., Sault and T. J., Cornwell, “The Hamaker–Bregman–Sault Measurement Equation,” Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II –ASP Conference Series, vol. 180, pp. 657–669, 1999.Google Scholar
[27] B., Veidt, G., Hovey, T., Burgess, et al., “Demonstration of a dual-polarized phased-array feed,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2047–2057, Jun. 2011.Google Scholar
[28] Anon., “Techniques for mitigation of radio frequency interference in radio astronomy,” International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Tech. Rep. ITU–R RA.2126, 2013, www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-RA.2126.
[29] Anon., “Supplementary information on the detrimental threshold levels of interference to radio astronomy observation in recommendation ITU-R RA.769,” International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Tech. Rep. ITU–R RA.2131, 2008, www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-RA.2131.
[30] C., Anderson, B., Gaensler, and I., Feain, “RFI and its effect on spectropolarimetry with ATCA,” in Proc. ATNF Workshop on RFI and its Impact on the New Generation of HI Spectral-line Surveys, www.atnf.csiro.au/research/conferences/2013/rfi2013/index.html, CSIRO, Marsfield, NSW, Australia, Jun. 2013.
[31] J., Delhaize, L., Staveley-Smith, and M., Meyer, “HI spectral stacking –RFI challenges,” in ATNF Workshop on RFI and its Impact on the New Generation of HI Spectral-line Surveys, www.atnf.csiro.au/research/conferences/2013/rfi2013/index.html, CSIRO, Marsfield, NSW, Australia, Jun. 2013.
[32] S., Applebaum and D., Chapman, “Adaptive arrays with main beam constraints,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 24, pp. 650–662, Sep. 1976.Google Scholar
[33] A., Leshem and A.-J. van der, Veen, “Radio-astronomical imaging in the presence of strong radio interference,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1730–1747, Aug. 2000.Google Scholar
[34] A., Leshem, A.-J. van der, Veen, and A.-J., Boonstra, “Multichannel interference mitigation techniques in radio astronomy,” Astrophysical Journal Supplements, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 355–374, 2000.Google Scholar
[35] J., Raza, A.-J., Boonstra, and A.-J. van der, Veen, “Spatial filtering of rf interference in radio astronomy,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 64–67, Feb. 2002.Google Scholar
[36] B., Jeffs, L., Li, and K., Warnick, “Auxiliary antenna assisted interference mitigation for radio astronomy arrays,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 439–451, Feb. 2005.Google Scholar
[37] J., Nagel, K., Warnick, B., Jeffs, J., Fisher, and R., Bradley, “Experimental verification of radio frequency interference mitigation with a focal plane array feed,” Radio Science, vol. 42, 2007, RS6013, doi:10.1029/2007RS003630.
[38] G., Hellbourg, R., Weber, C., Capdessus, and A., Boonstra, “Oblique projection beamforming for RFI mitigation in radio astronomy,” in Proc. IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Aug. 2012.
[39] R., Behrens and L., Scharf, “Signal processing applications of oblique projection operators,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1413–1424, Jun. 1994.Google Scholar
[40] T. K., Moon and W. C., Stirling, Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1999, pp. 71–129.
[41] J., Rissanen, “Modeling by shortest data description,” Automatica, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 465–471, Sep. 1978.Google Scholar
[42] H., Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. AC-19, pp. 716–723, Jun. 1974.Google Scholar
[43] S., Ellingson and G., Hampson, “A subspace-tracking approach to interference nulling for phased array-based radio telescopes,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25–30, Jan. 2002.Google Scholar
[44] R., Cornwell, “Multiscale CLEAN deconvolutions of radio synthesis images,” IEEE J. of Selected Topics in Signal Processingl, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 793–801, Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
[45] J., Noordam, “Peeling the visibility onion, the optimum way of self-calibration,” ASTRON, Dwingeloo the Netherlands, Tech. Rep., Jun. 2003.
[46] B., Jeffs and K., Warnick, “Bias corrected PSD estimation for an adaptive array with moving interference,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 3108–3121, Jul. 2008.Google Scholar
[47] J., Landon, M., Elmer, D., Jones, et al., “Phased array feed calibration, beamforming, and imaging,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 1154–1167, Mar. 2010.Google Scholar
[48] J.-W. W., Steeb, D. B., Davidson, and S. J., Wijnholds, “Spatial filtering of nearfield radio frequency interference at a LOFAR LBA station,” in 2016 Radio Frequency Interference (RFI), Oct. 2016, pp. 117–122. doi: 10.1109/RFINT. 2016.7833544.Google Scholar
[49] T., Yu and G. M., Rebeiz, “A 22–24 GHz 4-element CMOS phased array with onchip coupling characterization,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2134–2143, 2008.Google Scholar
[50] D., Heo and K. F., Warnick, “Integrated eight element Ku band transmit/receive beamformer chipset for low-cost commercial phased array antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology (ARRAY), 2010, pp. 653–659.Google Scholar
[51] S., Zhu, Y., You, S. P., Sah, D., Heo, and K. F., Warnick, “An 8-channel Ku band transmit beamformer with low gain/phase imbalance between channels,” in Proc. European Microwave Conference, 2013, pp. 947–950.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×