Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 The Epistemology of Science
- 2 The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs
- 3 The Milgromian Research Program
- 4 Theory Variant T0: The Foundational Postulates
- 5 Theory Variant T1: A Non-relativistic Lagrangian
- 6 Theory Variant T2: A Relativistic Theory
- 7 Theory Variant T3: A Modified Hard Core
- 8 Convergence
- 9 Summary / Final Thoughts
- References
- Index
9 - Summary / Final Thoughts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2020
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 The Epistemology of Science
- 2 The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs
- 3 The Milgromian Research Program
- 4 Theory Variant T0: The Foundational Postulates
- 5 Theory Variant T1: A Non-relativistic Lagrangian
- 6 Theory Variant T2: A Relativistic Theory
- 7 Theory Variant T3: A Modified Hard Core
- 8 Convergence
- 9 Summary / Final Thoughts
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter summarizes the results from Chapters 4-8 and speculates on a question that is posed at the start of the book: Why is it that Milgrom’s theory, in spite of its remarkable successes, has been so widely ignored by standard-model cosmologists? It is argued that the approach of standard-model cosmologists to theory corroboration is different from that of Milgromian researchers: the first behave like verificationists, the second like critical rationalists. Unlike Milgrom’s theory, the standard cosmological model has made few if any successful novel predictions, and so it is understandable that standard-model cosmologists have gravitated toward a methodology that favors verification over critical rationalism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Philosophical Approach to MONDAssessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology, pp. 223 - 236Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020