Book contents
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Politics of Ability
- Chapter 1 William Godwin and Capacity
- Chapter 2 Invigorating Women
- Chapter 3 Wordsworth’s ‘The Discharged Soldier’ and the Question of Desert
- Part II Aesthetics of Deformity
- Conclusion
- Appendix Dictionary Definitions of ‘Disability’ and ‘Deformity’
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
Chapter 2 - Invigorating Women
Female Weakness in the Work of Mary Wollstonecraft
from Part I - Politics of Ability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Politics of Ability
- Chapter 1 William Godwin and Capacity
- Chapter 2 Invigorating Women
- Chapter 3 Wordsworth’s ‘The Discharged Soldier’ and the Question of Desert
- Part II Aesthetics of Deformity
- Conclusion
- Appendix Dictionary Definitions of ‘Disability’ and ‘Deformity’
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Romanticism
Summary
Mary Wollstonecraft challenges the social disablement of women by promoting a vigorous and curative feminism that establishes women’s qualifications for equality by virtue of their capacities. She associates female weakness with inutility and social degradation and promotes bodily and physical independence as ideals. Misogynistic cultures weaken the bodies and minds of women, Wollstonecraft asserts, and she petitions for women to develop (and be permitted to develop) their physical and intellectual abilities rather than to perpetuate a culture that is focused on the aesthetics of women’s bodies. Significantly, she suggests that it is absurd that weakness is treated as something aesthetically desirable in women. She concludes that society cannot maintain women’s social inutility as an aesthetic, as it is detrimental to social progress. Wollstonecraft’s implied theory of deformity (which links it to moral degradation) is articulated through its acknowledged opposite, beauty. These views are, however, incompatible with the compassion, sympathy, and sensibility Wollstonecraft expresses when considering deformity more directly.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Physical Disability in British Romantic Literature , pp. 65 - 97Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020