Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:55:01.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Power and Its Trappings in the Han and Roman Bureaucracies

from Part II - Performances of Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

By
Taco Terpstra
Edited by
Hans Beck  and
Griet Vankeerberghen
Hans Beck
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Griet Vankeerberghen
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

The chapters assembled in this part turn to the key question of how the exercise of power was subject to a broad array of performative practices, in places as diverse as the administration of the state, public spectacles, agricultural production, and literature. Taco Terpstra kicks off with the performative dimension of statecraft. Due to their substantiated degree of structured hierarchies, standardized procedures, and the ability to employ officials with specific assignments, the imperial administrations of Rome and Han China capture, in exemplary fashion, the design of premodern statehood. Yet both governments looked rather different. While the Chinese relied on a large apparatus of officials who were appointed and paid by the state, Rome governed via a notoriously narrow pool of magistrates whose bureaucratic powers quintessentially built on the support of countless unsalaried local elites. Terpstra’s discussion of these differences departs from an analysis of how administrative rank and agency were expressed through clothing and other symbols of power. Prima facie minor aspects of the grand scheme of empire, the study of Sima Biao’s (third century CE) Treatise on Carriages and Robes, and On the Magistracies of the Roman State by John the Lydian (sixth century CE) offer exciting insight into the ways in which state power was conceived of and articulated throughout the empire. The chapter then segues into the question of state formation and the emergence of bureaucratic structures. Terpstra discloses how, in China, the thrust toward performance-based appointments and promotions preconditioned the rise of a professional bureaucratic corps, whereas the Romans, he argues, actively discouraged such a development. Both dispositions had eminent consequences for the longue durée of state power.

Keywords

state powerbureaucracyofficial dress and symbolismSima BiaoJohn the Lydianstatecraft
Type
Chapter
Information
Place and Performance in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China , pp. 89 - 113
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ando, C. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2006. “The Administration of the Provinces.” In Potter, D., ed., A Companion to the Roman Empire, 177–92. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Atanasov, G. 2007. “Late Antique Tomb in Durostorum‐Silistra and Its Master.” Pontica 40: 447–68.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1972. Publicans and Sinners: Private Enterprise in the Service of the Roman Republic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bandy, A. C. 1983. Ioannes Lydus on Powers or The Magistracies of the Roman State (Introduction, Critical text, Translation, Commentary, and Indices). Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Bang, P. F. 2011. “Court and State in the Roman Empire: Domestication and Tradition in Comparative Perspective.” In Duindam, J., Artan, T., and Kunt, M., eds., Royal Courts in Dynastic States and Empires: A Global Perspective, 101–28. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Barbieri-Low, A. J., and Yates, R. D. S.. 2015. Law, State, and Society in Early Imperial China: A Study with Critical Edition and Translation of the Legal Texts from Zhangjiashan Tomb No. 247, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2020. “Registers of ‘the People’ in Greece, Rome, and China.” In Beck, H. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China, 193–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bielenstein, H. 1980. The Bureaucracy of Han Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodde, D. 1975. Festivals in Classical China: New Year and Other Annual Observances During the Han Dynasty 206 B.C.–A.D. 220. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, C. 2015. Political Order and Inequality: Their Foundations and Their Consequences for Human Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransbourg, G. 2008. “Fiscalité impériale et finances municipales au ive siècle.” Antiquité Tardive 16: 255–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransbourg, G. 2015. “The Later Roman Empire.” In Monson, A. and Scheidel, W., eds., Fiscal Regimes and the Political Economy of Premodern States, 258–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, Liang. 2014. Witchcraft and the Rise of the First Confucian Empire. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ch’ü, T’ung-tsu. 1972. Han Dynasty China, Vol 1: Han Social Structure, ed. Dull, J. L.. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Cipolla, C. M. 1994. Before the Industrial Revolution: European Society and Economy, 1000–1700, 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. 2019. A History of the Roman Equestrian Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Crespigny, R. R. 2008. “Recruitment Revisited: The Commissioned Civil Service of Later Han.” Early Medieval China 13–14(2): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzau, A. T., and North, D. C.. 1994. “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions.” Kyklos 47: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, D. P. 1960. “Le pitture murali del sepolcro romano di Silistra.” Arte Antica e Moderna 12: 351–65.Google Scholar
Downing, B. M. 1992. The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dubs, H. H. 1938–55. The History of the Former Han Dynasty, 3 vols. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Eich, P. 2015. “The Common Denominator: Late Roman Imperial Bureaucracy from a Comparative Perspective.” In Scheidel, W., ed., State Power in Ancient China and Rome, 90–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elton, H. 2006. “The Transformation of Government under Diocletian and Constantine.” In Potter, D., ed., A Companion to the Roman Empire, 193–205. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertman, T. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, S. E. 1997. The History of Government from the Earliest Times, Vol. I: Ancient Monarchies and Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 2011. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Habberstad, L. 2017. Forming the Early Chinese Court: Rituals, Spaces, Roles. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1978. Conquerors and Slaves: Sociological Studies in Roman History, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal: Sociological Studies in Roman History, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1964. The Later Roman Empire 284–602: A Social and Administrative Survey, 2 vols. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. 2004. Ruling the Later Roman Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Kiser, E., and Cai, Yong. 2003. “War and Bureaucratization in Qin China: Exploring an Anomalous Case.” American Sociological Review 68(4): 511–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 2000. “The Han Abolition of Universal Military Service.” In van de Ven, H., ed., Warfare in Chinese History, 33–76. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Li, Feng. 2008. Bureaucracy and the State in Early China: Governing the Western Zhou. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Feng 2013. Early China: A Social and Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lobur, J. A. 2008. Consensus, Concordia, and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewe, M. 2004. The Men Who Governed Han China: Companion to a Biographical Dictionary of the Qin, Former Han and Xin Periods. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewe, M. 2006. The Government of the Qin and Han Empires 221 BCE–220 CE. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1964. “Some Pictures in Ammianus Marcellinus.” Art Bulletin 46: 435–55.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1988. Corruption and the Decline of Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 2012. The Sources of Social Power, Vol. 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansvelt Beck, B. J. 1990. The Treatises of Later Han: Their Author, Sources, Contents and Place in Chinese Historiography. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monson, A., and Scheidel, W., eds., 2015. Fiscal Regimes and the Political Economy of Premodern States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, N. 2010. The Roman Empire: Roots of Imperialism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R.. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, D. ed., 2006. A Companion to the Roman Empire. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, D. 2014. “The Roman Army and Navy.” In Flower, H. I., ed., The Cambridge Companion to The Roman Republic, 2nd ed., 54–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2009. “War, State Formation, and the Evolution of Military Institutions in Ancient China and Rome.” In Scheidel, W., ed., Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires, 24–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2007. “Demography.” In Scheidel, W., Morris, I., and Saller, R., eds., The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, 38–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2009a. “From the ‘Great Convergence’ to the ‘First Great Divergence’: Roman and Qin-Han State Formation and Its Aftermath.” In Scheidel, W., ed., Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires, 11–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. ed., 2009b. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2015a. “State Revenue and Expenditure in the Han and Roman Empires.” In Scheidel, W., ed., State Power in Ancient China and Rome, 150–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2015b. “The Early Roman Monarchy.” In Monson, A. and Scheidel, W., eds., Fiscal Regimes and the Political Economy of Premodern States, 229–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. ed., 2015c. State Power in Ancient China and Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2018. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2019. Escape from Rome: The Failure of Empire and the Road to Prosperity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., and Friesen, S. J.. 2009. “The Size of the Economy and the Distribution of Income in the Roman Empire.” Journal of Roman Studies 99: 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebesta, J. L., and Bonfante, L., eds., 1994. The World of Roman Costume. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Steinby, E. M., ed., 1993–2000. Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae, 6 vols. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Stone, S. 1994. “The Toga: From National to Ceremonial Costume.” In Sebesta, J. L. and Bonfante, L., eds., The World of Roman Costume, 13–45. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stout, A. M. 1994. “Jewelry as a Symbol of Status in the Roman Empire.” In Sebesta, J. L. and Bonfante, L., eds., The World of Roman Costume, 77–100. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Tan, J. K. 2015. “The Roman Republic.” In Monson, A. and Scheidel, W., eds., Fiscal Regimes and the Political Economy of Premodern States, 208–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, J. K. 2017. Power and Public Finance at Rome, 264–49 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terpstra, T. T. 2019. Trade in the Ancient Mediterranean: Private Order and Public Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Terpstra, T. T. 2020. “The Imperial Cult and the Sacred Bonds of Roman Overseas Commerce.” In Keay, S. and Arnaud, P., eds., Roman Port Societies: The Evidence of Inscriptions, 178–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making.” In Tilly, C., ed., The Formation of National States in Western Europe, 3–83. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Von Falkenhausen, L. 2006. Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (1000–250 BC): The Archaeological Evidence. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Falkenhausen, L. 2014. “Review: Li Feng, Bureaucracy and the State in Early China – Governing the Western Zhou.” Zhejiang University Journal of Art and Archaeology 1: 252–76.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1968 [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 3 vols. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Whitby, M. 2016. “The Late Roman Empire Was Before All Things a Bureaucratic State.” In Crooks, P. and Parsons, T. H., eds., Empires and Bureaucracy in World History: From Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century, 129–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, E. 2015. Chinese History: A New Manual, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winters, J. A. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Dingxin. 2015a. The Confucian-Legalist State: A New Theory of Chinese History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Dingxin 2015b. “The Han Bureaucracy: Its Origin, Nature, and Development.” In Scheidel, W., ed., State Power in Ancient China and Rome, 56–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×