Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:27:36.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Society, Cities, and the Significance of ‘Sacred Roads’ in Archaic Greece, in the Chinese Qin and Han Empires, and in the Archaic States of the Middle East

from Part III - Urban Places

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

Hans Beck
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Griet Vankeerberghen
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Martin Mohr’s chapter extends issues of urban space and infrastructure to the critical theme of Sacred Roads. It thus complements the chapters on neighborhoods, water supplies, and public gardens. Within the city and beyond its urban environment, roads have been both a facilitator of mobility and a conveyor of meaning at all times and in all cultures. Acknowledging the fundamental difference in the basic configuration of ancient Greek and Qin and Han Chinese societies, Mohr’s exploration of the significance of monumental roads emanates from the careful crafting of a meaningful matrix of comparison. He finds this in the typology of ancient societies as modelled in the works of Christoph Ulf; although tied to observations in the ancient Mediterranean, Mohr explains how the model is applicable to ancient worlds in general. Reliance on bureaucratic structures and techniques set Chinese building projects apart from the notoriously small scale of Greek roads. The question of physical disproportions set apart – note how Chang’an contained a monumental grid of multi-lane passage fares – the chapter demonstrates how the Direct Road, from Yunyang to Jiuyuan, was the religious and topographical backbone of Chinese society, much like sacred procession roads in ancient Greece, for instance on the island of Samos. In both cases, the purpose of reinforcing central strategies to establish physical connections between political and religious centres went hand in hand with the goal of achieving societal cohesion. The comparison concludes with further insight into regions between China and the Mediterranean, whose monumentally and ideologically inflated palatial cities once again accentuated an intriguing foil for the Greek example.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrae, W. 1964. Alte Feststrassen im Nahen Osten. Stuttgart: Verlag Freies Geistesleben. First published 1941 as 10. Sendschrift der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft by the J. C. Hinrichs Verlag, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2020. Localism and the Ancient Greek City-State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhringer, D. 2001. Heroenkulte in Griechenland von der geometrischen bis zur klassischen Zeit: Attika, Argolis, Messenien. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duplouy, A. 2006. Le prestige des élites: recherches sur les modes de reconnaissance sociale en Grèce entre les Xe et Ve siècles avant J.-C. Paris: Société d’édition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Gehler, M., and Rollinger, R., eds. 2014. Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, Part I: Imperien des Altertums, Mittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Imperien. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Giardino, L., and De Siena, A.. 1999. ‘Metaponto’. In Greco, E., ed., La Città greca antica: istituzioni, società e forme urbane, 329–63. Rome: Donzelli editore.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1994. ‘Tempel, Agora und Alphabet: Die Entstehungsbedingungen von Gesetzgebung in der archaischen Polis’. In Gehrke, H.-J., ed., Rechtskodifizierung und soziale Normen im interkulturellen Vergleich, 135–64. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2001. ‘Schatzhäuser – Banketthäuser?’. In Böhm, S. and von Eickstedt, K.-V., eds., ΙΘΑΚΗ. Festschrift für Jörg Schäfer zum 75. Geburtstag am 25. April 2001, 143–52. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.Google Scholar
Kehne, P. 2014. ‘Das attische Seereich (478–404 v. Chr.) und das spartanische Hegemonialreich (nach 404 v. Chr.): Griechische Imperien?’. In Gehler, M. and Rollinger, R., eds., Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, Part I: Imperien des Altertums, Mittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Imperien, 329–62. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kern, M. 2000. The Stele Inscriptions of Ch’in Shih-huang: Text and Ritual in Early Chinese Imperial Representation. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Kistler, E. 1996. Die Opferrinne-Zeremonie: Bankettideologie am Grab, Orientalisierung und Formierung einer Adelsgesellschaft in Athen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kistler, E. 2020. ‘Zwischen stasis und eunomia. Banketthäuser und soziale Gruppenbildung im archaischen Griechenland’. In Meister, J. B. and Seelentag, G., eds., Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik, 119–55. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 2000. ‘The City-State in Spring-and-Autumn China’. In Hansen, M. H., ed. A Comparative History of Thirty City-State Cultures, 359–73. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Lettres.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 2006. The Construction of Space in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. E., and Hsieh, Mei-yu. 2017. ‘Tianxia and the Invention of Empire in East Asia’. In Wang, Ban, ed., Chinese Visions of World Order: Tianxia, Culture, and World Politics, 2548. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, M. 2015. ‘The Tombs Built for Han Chengdi and Migrations of the Population’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 201–17. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. 1997a. ‘Babylon’. In Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Der Neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike, Vol. 2, 384–8. Stuttgart: Metzler’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung und Carl Ernst Poeschel Verlag.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. 1997b. ‘Die altorientalische Hauptstadt: Abbild und Nabel der Welt’. In Wilhelm, G., ed., Die orientalische Stadt: Kontinuität, Wandel, Bruch. 1. Internationales Colloquium der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft, 9.–10. Mai 1996 in Halle/Saale, 109–24. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag.Google Scholar
Mazarakis Ainian, A. 2006. ‘The Archaeology of basileis’. In Deger-Jalkotzy, S. and Lemos, I., eds., Ancient Greece: From the Mycenaean Palaces to the Age of Homer, 181211. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meister, J. B., and Seelentag, G.. 2020. ‘Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung. Neue Perspektiven auf die griechische Archaik’. In Meister, J. B. and Seelentag, G., eds., Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik, 1138. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, D. 2006. Städte und Bauten der Westgriechen. Von der Kolonialzeit bis zur Krise um 400 vor Christus. Munich: Hirmer Verlag.Google Scholar
Mohr, M. 2013. Die Heilige Strasse: Ein ‘Weg der Mitte’? Soziale Gruppenbildung im Spannungsfeld der archaischen Polis. Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Novàk, M. 2005. ‘From Ashur to Niniveh: The Assyrian Town Planning Project’. In Collon, D. and George, A., eds., Nineveh: Papers of the XLIXe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, London, 7–11 July 2003, 177–85. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Novàk, M. 2017. ‘Herr der Gesamtheit, Liebling der Götter und Guter Hirte: Konzepte des mesopotamischen Königtums und ihre materiellen Manifestationen’. In Rebenich, S., ed., Monarchische Herrschaft im Altertum, 6182. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylan, M. 2012. ‘The Power of Highway Networks During China’s Classical Era (323 BCE–316 CE): Regulations, Metaphors, Rituals, and Deities’. In Alcock, S. E., Bodell, J., and Talbert, R. J. A., eds., Highways, Byways, and Road Systems in the Pre-modern World, 3365. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylan, M. 2015. ‘Introduction’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 352. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M., and Vankeerberghen, G., eds. 2015. Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Radner, K. 2014. ‘The Neo-Assyrian Empire’. In Gehler, M. and Rollinger, R., eds., Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, Part I: Imperien des Altertums, Mittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Imperien, 101–19. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Radner, K. 2017. ‘Economy, Society, and Daily Life in the Neo-Assyrian Period’. In Frahm, E., ed., A Companion to Assyria, 209–28. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rebenich, S., ed. 2017. Monarchische Herrschaft im Altertum. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösler, W. 1976. ‘Die Dichtung des Archilochos und die neue Kölner Epode’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 119: 289310.Google Scholar
Routledge, C. 1997. ‘Temple as the Center of Ancient Egyptian Urbanism’. In Aufrecht, W. E., Mirau, N. A., and Gauley, S. W., eds., Urbanism in Antiquity: From Mesopotamia to Crete, 221–35. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J. M. 2017. ‘Assyrian Cities and Architecture’. In Frahm, E., ed., A Companion to Assyria, 423–52. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sanft, C. 2011. ‘Debating the Route of the Qin Direct Road (Zhidao): Text and Excavation’. Frontiers of History in China 6(3): 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanft, C. 2014. Communication and Cooperation in Early Imperial China: Publicizing the Qin Dynasty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., ed. 2009a. ‘Introduction’. In Scheidel, W., ed., Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires, 310. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2009b. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, C. 2014. ‘Die Diadochenstaaten: ‘Imperien’ oder doch konkurrierende Territorialstaaten?’. In Gehler, M. and Rollinger, R., eds., Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, Part I: Imperien des Altertums, Mittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Imperien, 387400. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Seelentag, G. 2020. ‘Das Kartell. Ein Modell soziopolitischer Organisation in der griechischen Archaik’. In Meister, J. B. and Seelentag, G., eds., Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik, 6194. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. 2019. ‘Eliten im archaischen Griechenland’. In Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J., eds., Ethos – Ehre – Exzellenz. Antike Eliten im Vergleich, 4359. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (1st ed. 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Xiaofeng. 2015. ‘The Evolution of Imperial Urban Form in Western Han Chang’an’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 5574. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Tian, Tian. 2015. ‘The Suburban Sacrifice Reforms and the Evolution of the Imperial Sacrifices’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 263–91. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. 1990. Die homerische Gesellschaft: Materialien zur analytischen Beschreibung und historischen Lokalisierung. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. 2015. ‘Gesellschaft und Herrschaft’. In Wittke, A.-M., ed., Der Neue Pauly Supplemente, Vol. 10: Frühgeschichte der Mittelmeerkulturen. Historisch-archäologisches Handbuch, 853–88. Stuttgart: Metzler’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung und Carl Ernst Poeschel Verlag.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. 2017. ‘Führung – nicht Herrschaft: Widerstreitende Diskurse bei Homer und Hesiod und ihr historischer Kontext’. In Rebenich, S., ed., Monarchische Herrschaft im Altertum, 141–65. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. 2018. ‘3.2. Society and Authority’. In Dillon, J. N., ed., Brill’s New Pauly Supplements II, Vol. 9: The Early Mediterranean World, 1200–600 BC, trans. D. A. Smart.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. 2020. ‘Die relativ Besten grenzen sich ab. Aristokratisierung durch Aufhebung des Wettbewerbs im archaischen Griechenland’. In Meister, J. B. and Seelentag, G., eds., Konkurrenz und Institutionalisierung in der griechischen Archaik, 95118. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Ulf, C., and Kistler, E.. 2020. Die Entstehung Griechenlands. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Vliet, E. Ch. L. 2005. ‘Polis: The Problem of Statehood’. Social Evolution & History 4(2): 120–50.Google Scholar
van Ess, H. 2014. ‘Chinesische Imperien’. In Gehler, M. and Rollinger, R., eds., Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, Part I: Imperien des Altertums, Mittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Imperien, 515–35. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Wallinga, H. T. 2000. ‘The Athenian Naukraroi’. In Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H., ed., Peisistratos and the Tyranny: A Reappraisal of the Evidence, 131–46. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben Publisher.Google Scholar
Zahrnt, M. 2014. ‘Das Königreich Makedonien – vor und nach Philipp II’. In Gehler, M. and Rollinger, R., eds., Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, Part I: Imperien des Altertums, Mittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Imperien, 363–86. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×