from ARTICLES
At the end of the nineteenth century Polish publicists started to taik with increasing frequency about the bankruptcy of assimilation. Although vigorously denied by lzraelita, many of its sympathisers shared the opinion. They intensified their criticism of their previous activity, they acknowledged numerous mistakes and attempted to formulate a new programme. They blamed the Orthodox, the Zionists and the anti-semites for their own lack of widespread influence. They complained of Polish society's indifference to the problems that they were forced to face. The final words of the Lwów paper Ojczyzna were:
Tired and exhausted we yield. We once believed and still believe that the Jews could only be granted citizenship with the cooperation of native Polish society. We thought that the Polish community would extend its hand to this joint work toward our common advantage. We have been disappointed. What has the country contributed towards the moral and economic elevation of the Jewish masses during the quarter century of autonomous govemments?
It is worth looking closer at this question of the bankruptcy of assimilation. Did this bankruptcy really occur and why did assimilation decline, a movement which had seemed so dynamic immediately after the January Uprising? Are the assimilationists themselves more to blame for its failure than the Poles? Were ‘mistakes’ made by both sides?
First, however, I would like to draw attention to a problem of terminology. Various terms were used in the second half of the nineteenth century to describe this and related phenomena: assimilation, the attainment of citizenship (uobywatelnienie), emancipation, civilizing and progressiveness. These were often used interchangeably. No research was done at the time into the phenomenon of assimilation, neither was a theory developed that could adequately describe this process. Approaches to it were, on the whole, intuitive. Assimilation, many publicists assumed, meant the same as the attainment of citizenship, emancipation or, for that matter, progress. Polonized Jews were called ‘postfępowy’ (progressives) or civilized. These words were used by all groups, Jews and Poles alike, although they understood them somewhat differently. The Ha-Tsefirah group for instance saw emancipation as interconnected with acculturation; Poles of the Mosaic persuasion, on the other hand, understood emancipation as linked to assimilation. The latter group saw assimilation as a natural outcome of possession of equal rights. That was what in fact happened, on the whole, in Poland in the first half of the nineteenth century as well.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.