Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:19:02.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Critic

The Limits of Hot Spots Policing

from Part VII - Hot Spots Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

By
Dennis P. Rosenbaum
Edited by
David Weisburd  and
Anthony A. Braga
David Weisburd
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

I begin this chapter with a brief acknowledgement of the potential benefits of hot spot policing, followed by a serious critique. The thesis of this paper is that, while the concept of hot spots policing is attractive, we should be concerned about how scholars have narrowly defined it in theory and research and how police organizations have narrowly practiced it. While recent experimental tests have improved the situation, in general, the practice of hot spots policing has failed to embody the fundamental principles of problem-oriented policing, community policing and procedural justice, which many scholars believe represent the basic pillars of “good policing” in the twenty-first century. Too often, place-based or hot spots policing fails to specify innovative strategies or tactics for police officers once they arrive at hot spots and the hot spots themselves are poorly specified. Consequently, the reliance on conventional enforcement tactics can lead to collateral damage to the community, especially people of color and those of low income.

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
 , pp. 314 - 344
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderden, M. A., Schuck, A. M., Lavery, T. A., Stephens, C. D., Johnston, R. M., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2010). Gang Hot Spots Policing in Chicago: An Evaluation of the Deployment Operations Center Process. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Chicago: Chicago Police Department and Center for Research in Law and Justice, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. (2011). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Andreou, J. C. (2003). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Barnum, J. D., Campbell, W. L., Trocchio, S., Caplan, J. M., & Kennedy, L. W. (2016). Examining the environmental characteristics of drug dealing locations. Crime and Delinquency, 1–26. doi: 10.1177/0011128716649735.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. The Annals of American Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Piehl, A. M., & Waring, E. J. (2001). Reducing Gun Violence: The Boston Gun Project’s Operation Ceasefire. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31, 633–663.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. L. (2012). The effects of “pulling levers” focused deterrence strategies on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E., Green Mazerolle, L., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37(3), 541–580.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In Clarke, R.V., & Felson, M. (eds.), Routine Activity and Rationale Choice. Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.Google Scholar
Bursik, R. J. Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
Bushway, S. (1996). The impact of a criminal history record on access to legitimate employment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. H. John Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–605.Google Scholar
Collinson, S., & Jarrett, L. (2017). Trump embraces law and order agenda. CNN. Updated 9:47 AM ET, Tue August 29. www.cnn.com/2017/08/29/politics/trump-law-order-jeff-sessions/index.html.Google Scholar
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (eds.). (1986). The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Donner, C., Maskaly, J., Fridell, L., & Jennings, W. G. (2015). Policing and procedural justice: A state-of-the-art review. Policing, 38(1), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1994). The new police order: Effectiveness, equity, and efficiency in community policing. In Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises (pp. 3–23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 1–33.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Wartell, J. (1996). Reducing crime and drug dealing by improving place management: A randomized experiment. Report to the San Diego Police Department. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markek, D. (2014). Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Esbensen, F., Peterson, D., Taylor, T. J., Hawkins, D., & Freng, A. (2010). Youth Violence: Sex and Race Differences in Offending, Victimization, and Gang Membership Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, J. A. (2017). Policing and segregation. A paper presented at New York University’s Furman Center, Dream Revisited series. July. http://furmancenter.org/research/iri/essay/policing-and-segregation.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Fagan, J., & Kiss, A. (2007). An analysis of the New York City police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(479), 813–823.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Weisburd, D. L., Telep, C.W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, B. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented Policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Graziano, L. M., Rosenbaum, D. P., & Schuck, A. M. (2014). Building group capacity for problem solving and police-community partnerships through survey feedback and training: A Randomized Control Trial within Chicago’s community policing program. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(1), 79–103.Google Scholar
Greene, J. R. (2000). Community policing in America: Changing the nature, structure, and function of the police. In Horney, J., Martin, J., MacKenzie, D. L., Peterson, R., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (eds.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (vol. 3, Criminal Justice 2000 series). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Green Mazerolle, L., & Roehl, J. (1998). Civil Remedies and Crime Prevention. Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Groff, E. R., Ratcliffe, J. H., Haberman, C. P., Sorg, E. T., Joyce, N. M., & Taylor, R. B. (2015). Does what police do at hot spots matter? The Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment. Criminology, 53(1), 23–53.Google Scholar
Henrichson, C., Rinaldi, J., & Delaney, R. (2015). The Price of Jails: Measuring the Taxpayer Cost of Local Incarceration. New York: Vera Institute of Justice. www.vera.org/price-of-jails.Google Scholar
Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Hinkle, J. C., & Weisburd, D. L. (2008). The irony of broken windows policing: A micro-place study of the relationship between disorder, focused police crackdowns and fear of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(6), 503–512.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld Davis, J. (2017). Trump to revive push on immigration crackdown on Long Island trip. New York Times, July 28. www.nytimes.com/2017/07/28/us/politics/trump-immigration-gangs.htmlGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. D., & Smith, B. W. (2008). Race and Police Brutality: Roots of an Urban Dilemma. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2013). Just Authority? Trust in the Police in England and Wales. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kane, R. J. (2002). The social ecology of police misconduct. Criminology, 40(4), 867–896.Google Scholar
Kendi, I. X. (2017). A history of race and racism in American, in 24 chapters. Book Review, New York Times, February 22. www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/books/review/a-history-of-race-and-racism-in-america-in-24-chapters.html.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1993). Closing the Market: Controlling the Drug Trade in Tampa, Florida. NIJ Program Focus. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Kleiman, M. (1988). Street-Level Drug Enforcement: Examining the Issues. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1986). Labeling theory and delinquency policy: An empirical test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1999). Attempting gang control by suppression: The misuse of deterrence principles. In Gaines, L. K., & Cordner, G. W. (eds.), Policing Perspectives: An Anthology. Ch. 18 (pp. 269–282). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R. (2011). Constructing hot spots policing: Unexamined consequences for disadvantaged populations and for police legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(3), 350–374.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R., & Weisburd, D. (2017). Assessing community consequences of implementing hot spots policing in residential areas: Findings from a randomized field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 143–170.Google Scholar
Koper, C. (1995). Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Lamberth, J. (1998). Driving while black: A statistician proves that prejudice still rules the road. Washington Post, August 16. Pg. C01.Google Scholar
Langton, L., & Durose, M. R. (2013). Police behavior during traffic and street stops, 2011. A Special Report. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice. NCJ 242937 September.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
Lum, C., & Nagin, D. S. (2017). Reinventing American policing. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 339–393.Google Scholar
Maciag, M. (2017). The alarming consequences of police working overtime. Governing: The States and Localities. October issue. www.governing.com/topics/public-justice-safety/gov-police-officers-overworked-cops.html.Google Scholar
Maher, L., & Dixon, D. (2001). The cost of crackdowns: Policing Cabramatta’s heroin market. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 13(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Main, F. (2016). Street cops say “ACLU effect” drives spike in gun violence. Chicago Tribune, January 31, 2016, 8:24 pm. https://chicago.suntimes.com/chicago-politics/street-cops-say-aclu-effect-drives-spike-in-gun-violence/.Google Scholar
Maltz, M., Gordon, A. C., & Friedman, W. (1990). Mapping Crime in Its Community Setting: Event Geography Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mamalian, C. A., & LaVigne, N. G. (1999). The Use of Computerized Mapping by Law Enforcement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Manning, M., Ferguson, P., & Sargeant, E. (2012). Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review of procedural justice. Brisbane: Campbell Crime and Justice Group, ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. F., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2015). From CompStat to RespectStat: Accountability for respectful policing. The Police Chief, August, 76–77.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E. F., Chermak, S., Weiss, A., & Wilson, J. (2001). Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 119–148.Google Scholar
Meisner, J. (2015). Chicago sued over police department’s alleged stop-and-frisk practices. Chicago Tribune, April 21.Google Scholar
Mueller, B. (2017). New York Police Dept. agrees to curb Stop-and-Frisk tactics. New York Times, February 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Confidence, neighbourhood policing, and contact: Drawing together the evidence. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq026.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https: doi.org/10.17226/24928.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2014). The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18613.Google Scholar
New York Civil Liberties Union. (2017). Stop-and-Frisk Data. www.nyclu.org/en/stop-and-frisk-data Annual Stop-and-Frisk.Google Scholar
New York Times Editorial Board. (2013). Racial discrimination in Stop-and-Frisk. New York Times. August 13. www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/opinion/racial-discrimination-in-stop-and-frisk.html.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A. V. (2003). The social structure of gang homicide in Chicago. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society of Criminology, November 21, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2017). Behind the Badge: Amid Protests and Calls for Reform, How Police View Their Jobs, Key Issues and Recent Fatal Encounters between Blacks and Police. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. January.Google Scholar
Pope, C., Lovell, R., & Hsia, H. M. (2003). Disproportionate Minority Confinement: A Review of Research Literature from 1989 to 2001. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Potter, G., Gaines, L., & Holbrook, B. (1990). Blowing smoke: An evaluation of marijuana eradication in Kentucky. American Journal of Police, 9(1), 97–116.Google Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015). Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J. H., Groff, E. R., Sorg, E. T., & Haberman, C. P. (2015). Citizens’ reactions to hot spots policing: Impacts on perceptions of crime, disorder, safety and police. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 393–417.Google Scholar
Reaves, B. A. (2015). Local Police Departments, 2013: Personnel, Policies, and Practices. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. May. NCJ 248677. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/lpd13ppp.pdf.Google Scholar
Rice, S. K., & White, M. D. (eds.). (2010). Race, Ethnicity and Policing: New and Essential Readings. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (1993). Civil liberties and aggressive enforcement: Balancing the rights of individuals and society in the drug war. In Davis, R. C., Lurigio, A. J., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (eds.), Drugs and the Community (pp. 55–82). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.). (1994). The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2002). Evaluating multi-agency anti-crime partnerships: Theory, design and measurement issues. Crime Prevention Studies, 14, 171–225.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2007). Just say no to D.A.R.E. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 1701–1711.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2015a). Reflections on the President’s Task Force Report: Time to re-think our core crime control strategies in American policing. Plenary Session: President’s Task Force on Policing. 2015 Symposium by the George Mason University Center for Evidence-based Crime Policy and the Police Foundation. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2015b). Strike up a conversation, not an interrogation: The Respectful Engaged Policing (REP) model. Testimony before the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Phoenix, Arizona, February 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2016). The National Police Research Platform: Advancing knowledge and practice in American policing. NIJ panel presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1995). Self-reports about place: The application of survey and interview methods to the study of small areas. Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 285–314.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., Lawrence, D. S., Hartnett, S. M., McDevitt, J., & Posick, C. (2015). Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: The Police-Community Interaction Survey. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 335–366.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., Lurigio, A. J., & Davis, R. C. (1998). The Prevention of Crime: Social and Situational Strategies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., Maskaly, J., Lawrence, D. S., Escamilla, J. H., Enciso, G., Christoff, T. E., Posick., C. (2017). The Police-Community Interaction Survey: Measuring police performance in new ways. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40 (1), 112–127.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., & McCarty, W. P. (2017). Organizational justice and officer “buy in” in American Policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40 (1), 11–25.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., & Schuck, A. (2012). Comprehensive community partnerships for preventing crime. In Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Crime Prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (2002). The community. In Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J. (eds.), Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control (pp. 225–252). Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.Google Scholar
Sanchez, R. Police push back against Trump’s law-and-order speech. CNN, Updated 11:27 PM ET, Sat July 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Savage, C., & Goode, E. (2013). Two powerful signals of a major shift on crime. New York Times. August 12, 2013.Google Scholar
Schuck, A. M., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2006). Promoting safe and healthy neighborhoods: What research tells us about intervention. In Fulbright-Anderson, K. (ed.), Community Change: Theories, Practices and Evidence (pp. 61–140). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 12. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1997). Policing for crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J. E., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (eds.), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Ch. 8. Report to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice. (NCJ 165366).Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–55.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (eds.). (1997). Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Report to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice (NCJ 165366).Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995a). Deterrent effects of police raids on crackdowns: A randomized, controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 755–781.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995b). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “Hot spots” patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 673–693.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (ed.). (2003). Community Policing: Can It Work? Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and Community in Chicago: A Tale of Three Cities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (1997). Community Policing Chicago Style. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, Wesley G., Steiner, L., Hartnett, S. M., DuBois, J., Bennis, J., Rottinghaus, B., Young Kim, S., Van, K., Rosenbaum, D. P. et al. (2002). Community Policing in Chicago, Years Eight and Nine: An Evaluation of Chicago’s Alternative Policing Strategy and Information Technology Initiative. Final report to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research. December.Google Scholar
Smith, M., Sviridoff, M., Sadd, S., Curtis, R., & Grinc, R. (1992). The Neighborhood Effects of Street-Level Drug Eenforcement. Tactical Narcotics Teams in New York: An evaluation of TNT. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Spelman, W. (1995). Criminal careers of public places. In Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime and Place, Crime Prevention Studies, 4 (pp. 115–144).Google Scholar
Sullivan, J., Thebault, R., Tate, J., & Jenkins, J. (2017). Number of fatal shootings by police is nearly identical to last year. The Washington Post, July 1.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. B. (1998). Crime and small-scale places: What we know, what we can prevent, and what else we need to know. Crime and place: Plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice (NIJ 168618).Google Scholar
Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2018). Crime concentration at place. In Johnson, S., & Bruinsma, G. (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terrill, W., & Reisig, M. D. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(3), 291–321.Google Scholar
Tittle, C. R., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Social Deviance and Crime: An Organizational and Theoretical Approach. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Tonry, M., & Farrington, D. P. (1995). Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 19.Google Scholar
Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From Prison to Home: The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2001). Trust and law-abiding behavior: Building better relationships between the police, the courts, and the minority community. Boston University Law Review, 81, 361–406.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Uchida, C., Forst, B., & Annan, S. (1992). Modern Policing and the Control of Illegal Drugs: Testing New Strategies in Two American Cities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
United States Department of Justice. (2017). The Civil Rights Division’s Pattern and Practice Police Reform Work: 1994-Present. Washington, DC: Civil Rights Division, US Department of Justice. www.justice.gov/crt/file/922421/download.Google Scholar
Wain, N., Ariel, B., & Tankebe, J. (2017). The collateral consequences of GPS-LED supervision in hot spots policing. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 18(4), 376–390.Google Scholar
Watson, A. C., Ottati, V. C., Morabito, M., Draine, J., Kerr, A. N., & Angell, B. (2010). Outcomes of police contacts with persons with mental illness: The impact of CIT. Administration and Policy, Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(4), 302–317.Google Scholar
Weinborn, C., Ariel, B., Sherman, L. W., & O’ Dwyer, E. (2017). Hotspots vs. harmspots: Shifting the focus from counts to harm in the criminology of place. Applied Geography, 86 (September), 226–244.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 54, 133–157.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L. (2016). Does hot spots policing inevitably lead to unfair and abusing policing practices or can we maximize both fairness and effectiveness in the new proactive policing? The University of Chicago Legal Forum. 2016 U. Chi. Legal F. 661.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Telep, C. W. (2008). Effects of problem-oriented policing on crime and disorder. Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews. www.campbellcollaboration.org/library.php.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., & Green, L. (1995a). Measuring immediate spatial displacement: Methodological issues and problems. In Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime and Place, Crime Prevention Studies 4, 349–361.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., & Green, L. (1995b). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 711–735.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S. M. (2012). The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2011). The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: An experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 297–320.Google Scholar
Weiss, A., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2009). Illinois Traffic Stop Statistics Study, 2008 Annual Report. Springfield: Illinois Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2006). Race and Policing in America: Conflicts and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P., & Sherman, L .W. (2001). Costs and Benefits of Preventing Crime. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Werner, A. (2017). Murder rate in NYC drops to lowest level in decades. CBS News. December 29, 2017, 6:38 PM. www.cbsnews.com/news/murder-rate-in-nyc-drops-to-lowest-level-in-decades/.Google Scholar
Werthman, C., & Piliavin, I. (1967). Gang members and the police. In Bordua, D. (ed.). The Police: Six Sociological Essays (pp. 56–98). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
White, C., & Weisburd, D. (2017). A co-responder model of policing mental health problems at crime hot spots: Findings from a pilot study. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(2), 194–209.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, I. (2010). The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America’s Great Migration. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Williams, H., & Murphy, P. V. (1990). The evolving strategy of police: A minority view. Perspectives in Policing, January issue (No. 13). National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J., (eds.). (2002). Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
Worden, R., Bynum, T., & Frank, J. (1994). Police crackdowns on drug abuse and trafficking. In McKenzie, D., & Uchida, C. (eds.), Drugs and Crime: Evaluating Public Policy Initiatives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Xue, Y., Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Earls, F. J. (2005). Neighborhood residence and mental health problems of 5- to 11-year-olds. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(5), 554–563.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×