Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:39:47.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Richard J. Watts
Richard J. Watts
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Politeness , pp. 279 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abordonado, V. 1998, The Effect of Gender on Linguistic Politeness in Written Discourse, PhD thesis, University of Arizona
Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1983, ‘The clanger phenomenon: the nondeviant nature of deviant utterances’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 41–57Google Scholar
Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1985a, ‘Improving emotive communication: verbal, prosodic, and kinesic conflict avoidance techniques’, Per Linguam 1: 21–33Google Scholar
Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1985b, ‘Politeness revisited: cross-modal supportive strategies’, IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 23(4): 281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, H. and Janney, R. 1987, InterGrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Arundale, R. 1999, ‘An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative politeness theory’, Pragmatics 9: 119–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, G. 1995, ‘Say “Thank you”: some pragmatic constraints in conversational closing’, Applied Linguistics 16(1): 57–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Austin, P. 1990, ‘Politeness revisited: the dark side’, in Bell, A. and Holmes, J. (eds.), New Zealand Ways of Speaking English. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 277–93
Axia, G. and Baroni, M. R. 1985, ‘Linguistic politeness at different age levels’, Child Development 56(4): 918–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Harris, S. J. 1996, ‘Requests and status in business correspondence’, Journal of Pragmatics 28: 635–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. 2001, Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where it's Heading, London: Routledge
Baroni, M.-R. and Axia, G. 1989, ‘Children's meta-pragmatic abilities and the identification of polite and impolite requests’, First Language 9(3): 285–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. and Silvern, L. 1977, ‘Social adjustment and politeness in preschoolers’, Journal of Communication 27(2): 104–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, R. 1981, ‘Christ respects no man's person: the plain language of the early quakers and the rhetoric of impoliteness’, Sociolinguistic Working Paper 88, University of Texas, Austin, TX
Baumgartner, A. 1908, Lehrgang der englischen Sprache: II. Teil: Lesebuch, 7th edition, Zürich: Orell Füssli
Bayraktaroğlu, A. 1991, ‘Politeness and interactional imbalance’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92: 5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayraktaroğlu, A. 1992, ‘Disagreement in Turkish trouble-talk’, Text 12: 317–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayraktaroğlu, A. 2000, ‘A repair mechanism in Turkish conversation: the case of EstagПfurullah’, Multilingua 1993: 281–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J. A. and Smenner, P. C. 1986, ‘The spontaneous use of “Thank you” by preschoolers as a function of sex, socioeconomic status, and listener status’, Language in Society 15(4): 537–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. B. 1988, Civility and Society in Western Europe, 1300–1600, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press
Beebe, L. and Takahashi, T. 1989, ‘“Do you have a bag?”: social status and patterned variation in second language acquisition’, in Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D. and Selinker, L. (eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Discourse and Pragmatics, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 103–25
Beinhauer, W. 1930, Spanische Umgangssprache, Bonn: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlag
Bellegarde, Abbé de 1696, L'art de connaître les hommes, Paris
Bellegarde, Abbé de ([1698] 1717), Reflexions upon the Politeness of Manners, London
Bentahila, A. and Davies, E. 1989, ‘Culture and language use: a problem for foreign language teaching’, IRAL 27(2): 99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, H. 1945, Discours sur la politesse, Paris: Editions Colbert
Bex, A. 1999, ‘Representations of English in twentieth-century Britain: Fowler, Gowers and Partridge’, in Bex, A. and Watts, R. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate, London: Routledge, 89–109
Biq, Y. 1984, ‘Indirect speech acts in Chinese polite expressions’, Journal of the Chinese Teachers Association 19(3): 1–10Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1982, ‘Learning how to say what you mean in a language’, Applied Linguistics 3: 29–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1983, ‘Interpreting and performing speech acts in a second language: a cross-cultural study of Hebrew and English’, in Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, pp. 36–55
Blum-Kulka, S. 1985, ‘Modifiers as indicating devices: same or different?’, Theoretical Linguistics 12(2/3): 213–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1987, ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?’, Journal of Pragmatics 11(1): 131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1989, ‘Playing it safe: the role of conventionality in indirectness’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 37–70
Blum-Kulka, S. 1990, ‘You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: parental politeness in family discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 259–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1992, ‘The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society’, in Watts, R. J., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 255–80
Blum-Kulka, S. 1994, ‘Review of Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Crosscultural Perspective by Maria Sifianou’, Pragmatics and Cognition 2(2): 349–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1997, ‘Discourse pragmatics’, in van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2. London: Sage, pp. 38–63
Blum-Kulka, S., Danet, B. and Gerson, R. 1985, ‘The language of requesting in Israeli society’, in Forgas, J. (ed.), Language and Social Situation. New York: Springer, pp. 113–41
Blum-Kulka, S. and House, J. 1989, ‘Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 123–54
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.) 1989, Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Blum-Kulka, S. and Kasper, G. (eds.) 1990, ‘Politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 14
Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. 1984, ‘Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)’, Applied Linguistics 5(3): 196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. and Weizman, E. 1988, ‘The inevitability of misunderstandings: discourse ambiguities’, Text 8: 219–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press
Bourdieu, P. 1991, Language and Symbolic Power, edited by J. Thompson and translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson, Cambridge: Polity Press
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. 1990 [1977], Reproduction in Education Society and Culture, London: Sage
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. and de Saint Martin, M. 1994, Academic Discourse, Cambridge: Polity Press
Boyer, A. 1702, The English Theophrastus: or, The Manners of the Age, Ann Arbor: Augustan Reprint Society, 1947
Braun, F. 1988, Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Brown, P. 1976, ‘Women and politeness: a new perspective on language and society’, Review in Anthropology 3: 240–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 1980, ‘How and why are women more polite? Some evidence from a Mayan community’, in McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R. and Furman, N. (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger, pp. 111–36
Brown, P. 1990, ‘Gender, politeness, and confrontation in Tenejapa’, Discourse Processes 13(1): 123–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 1994, ‘Gender, politeness, and confrontation in Tenejapa’, in Tannen, D. (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–62
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1978, ‘Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena’, in Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and Politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–289
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Brown, R. 1990, ‘Politeness theory: exemplar and exemplary’, in Rock, I. (ed.), The Legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in Cognition and Social Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 23–38
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960, ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 253–76
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1989, ‘Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies’, Language in Society 18(2): 159–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumke, J. 1986, Höfische Kultur, Munich: dtv
Burstein, J. 1989, ‘Politeness strategies and gender expectations’, CUNY Forum: Papers in Linguistics 14: 31–7Google Scholar
Bury, E. 1992, ‘Civiliser la “personne” ou instituer le “personnage”? Les deux versants de la politesse selon les théoriciens français du XVIIe siècle’, in Montandon, A. (ed.), Etiquette et politesse, Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 125–38
Bustamante Lopez, I. and Murcia, M. 1995, ‘Impositive speech acts in Northern Andean Spanish: a pragmatic description’, Hispania: a Journal Devoted to the Interests of the Teaching of Spanish and Portuguese 78(4): 885–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callières, F. de. 1972 [1693], Du bon et du mauvais usage, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints
Campbell, K. 1990, ‘Explanations in negative messages: more insights from speech act theory’, Journal of Business Communication 27(4): 357–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carré, J. 1994a, ‘Ethique et politesse des élites foncières anglaises (1750–1850)’, QWERTY: Arts, Littératures et Civilisations du Monde Anglophone 4: 339–45Google Scholar
Carré, J. 1994b, ‘The lady and the poor man; or, the philanthropist's etiquette’, in Carré, J. (ed.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900. Leiden: Brill, pp. 157–66
Carré, J. (ed.) 1994c, The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900, Leiden: Brill
Castiglione, B. [1528] 1966, The Book of the Courtier, New York: Dutton Everyman (first published 1516)
Chilman, C. 1980, ‘Parent satisfactions, concerns and goals for their children’, Family Relations 29: 339–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitoran, D. 1987, ‘The erosion of the boundaries between theoretical and applied linguistics: evidence from speech act theory’, in Tomic, O. and Shuy, R. (eds.), The Relation of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 115–38
Chomsky, N. 1972, Studies in Semantics in Generative Grammar, The Hague: Mouton
Clark, H. 1979, ‘Responding to indirect speech acts’, Cognitive Psychology 11: 430–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. and Schunk, D. 1975, ‘Polite responses to polite requests’, Cognition 8: 111–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. and Schunk, D. 1980, ‘Understanding what is meant from what is said: a study in conversationally conveyed results’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 56–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. and Schunk, D. 1981, ‘Politeness in requests: a rejoinder to Kemper and Thissen’, Cognition 9: 311–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, H. M. 1997, ‘The role of the Japanese masu form in caregiver–child conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 28(6): 695–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. 1979, ‘On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae’, Journal of Pragmatics 3: 239–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. 1981a, “Poison to your soul': thanks and apologies contrastively viewed', in Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational Routine, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 69–93
Coulmas, F. (ed.) 1981, Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, The Hague: Mouton
Coulmas, F. 1987, ‘Keigo–Höflichkeit und soziale Bedeutung im Japanischen’, Linguistische Berichte 107: 44–62Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. 1992, ‘Linguistic etiquette in Japanese society’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 299–323
Coupland, N., Grainger, K. and Coupland, J. 1988, ‘Politeness in context: intergenerational issues’, Language in Society 17(2): 253–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. 1989, The Politics of Discourse: the Standard Language Question and British Cultural Debates, London: Macmillan
Crystal, D. and Devey, D. 1969, Investigating English Style, London: Longman
Culpeper, J. 1996, ‘Towards an anatomy of impoliteness’, Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadt, E. 1992, ‘Politeness phenomena in South African Black English’, Pragmatics and Language Learning 3: 103–116Google Scholar
Kadt, E. 1994, ‘Towards a model for the study of politeness in Zulu’, South African Journal of African Languages/Suid Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Afrikatale 14(3): 103–12Google Scholar
Kadt, E. 1995, ‘“I must be seated to talk to you”: taking nonverbal politeness strategies into account’, Pragmatics and Language Learning. Monograph Series 6Google Scholar
Kadt, E. 1998, ‘The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language’, Journal of Pragmatics 29: 173–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Casa, G. [1558] 1958, Galateo, Harmondsworth: Penguin
Descartes, R. 1637, Discours de la méthode, Amsterdam
Diamond, J. 1996, Status and Power in Verbal Interaction, Amsterdam: Benjamins
DuFon, M., Kasper, G., Takahashi, S. and Yoshinaga, N. 1994, ‘Bibliography on linguistic politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 527–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupin, H. 1931, La courtoisie au Moyen Age, Paris: Picard
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. 1992, ‘Think practically and look locally: language and gender as community-based practice’, Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, W. 1977, A Pedagogic Grammar of the English Verb: a Handbook for the German Secondary Teacher of English, Tübingen: Narr
Edmondson, W. and House, J. 1982, ‘Höflichkeit als Lernziel im Englisch-unterricht’, Neusprachliche Mitteilungen 35(4): 218–27Google Scholar
Eelen, G. 1999, ‘Politeness and ideology: a critical review’, Pragmatics 9(1): 163–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, G. 2001, A Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester: St Jerome
Ehlich, K. 1992, ‘On the historicity of politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 71–107
Ehlich, K. 1993, ‘HIAT: A transcription system for discourse data’, in Edwards, J. and Lampert, M. (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123–48
Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1976, ‘Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen’, Linguistische Berichte 45: 21–41Google Scholar
Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1979, ‘Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT 2): Intonation’, Linguistische Berichte 59: 51–75Google Scholar
Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. 1981, ‘Zur Notierung nonverbaler Kommunikation für diskursive Zwecke (Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen HIAT 2)’, in Winkler, P. (ed.), Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face-Situationen, Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 302–329)
Elias, N. 1939, The History of Manners: the Civilizing Process, New York: Pantheon, 1978
Eliasoph, N. 1987, ‘Politeness, power, and women's language: rethinking study in language and gender’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 79–103Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1972, ‘Sociolinguistic rules of address’, in Pride, J. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 225–41
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1979, ‘How to make and to understand a request’, in Parret, H. and Sbisa, M. (eds.) Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino 1979. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 195–210
Ervin-Tripp, S., Guo, J. and Lampert, M. 1990, ‘Politeness and persuasion in children's control acts’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. 1989, ‘Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, pp. 221–48
Faret, N. 1632, L'honnête homme, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970
Ferguson, C. 1967, ‘Root–echo responses in Syrian Arabic politeness formulas’, in Stuart, D. (eds.), Linguistic Studies in Memory of Richard Slade Harrell. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 35–45
Ferguson, C. 1983, ‘God wishes in Syrian Arabic’, Mediterranean Review 1: 65–83Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. 1976, ‘The structure and use of politeness formulas’, Language in Society 5(2): 137–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. 1991, ‘Pragmatic modifications on the “representative” speech act of defining’, Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 253–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, P. 1992, Politeness and its Discontents: Problems in French Classical Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fraser, B. 1975, ‘Hedged performatives’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 187–210
Fraser, B. 1980, ‘Conversational mitigation’, Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. 1990, ‘Perspectives on politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 219–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. and Nolen, W. 1981, ‘The association of deference with linguistic form’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93–111Google Scholar
Fraser, B., Rintell, E. and Walters, J. 1980, ‘An approach to conducting: research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language’, in Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed.), Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research, Rowley, MA: Newbury, pp. 75–91
Fukushima, S. 1990, ‘Offers and requests: performance by Japanese learners of English’, World Englishes 9(3): 317–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, S. 1996, ‘Request strategies in British English and Japanese’, Language Sciences 18(3/4): 671–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, S. 2000, Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese, Bern: Peter Lang
Galliker, M. and Klein, M. 1993, ‘Knigges “Umgangsbuch”. Zur Entwicklung der bürgerlichen Kommunikationsregeln’, in Sonntag, M. and Jüttemann, G. (eds.), Individuum und Geschichte. Beiträge zur Diskussion um eine ‘Historische Psychologie’, Heidelberg: Asanger, pp. 74–88
García, C. 1989, ‘Apologizing in English: politeness strategies used by native and non-native speakers’, Multilingua 8(1): 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, C. 1993, ‘Making a request and responding to it: a case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers’, Journal of Pragmatics 19: 127–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, C. 1996, ‘Teaching speech act performance: declining an invitation’, Hispania 79(2): 267–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, C. 1999, ‘The three stages of Venezuelan invitations and responses’, Multilingua 18(4): 391–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, A.-F. and Pratt, C. 1990, ‘Children's pragmatic judgements of direct and indirect requests’, First Language 10(28, Pt 1): 51–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C. 1975, ‘Requests and responses in children's speech’, Child Language 2: 41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. and Neu, J. (eds.) 1995, Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, New York: Walter de Gruyter
Geis, M. 1995, Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction, New York: Cambridge University Press
Gleason, J. 1980, ‘The acquisition of social speech routines and politeness formulas’, in Giles, H., Robinson, W. and Smith, P. (eds.), Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 21–7
Gleason, J., Berko, J., Perlmann, R. and Greif, E. 1984, ‘What's the magic word: learning language through politeness routines’, Discourse Processes 7(4): 493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. and Weintraub, S. 1976, ‘The acquisition of routines in child language’, Language in Society 5: 129–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, D. 1996, ‘A reappraisal of Brown and Levinson's Politeness: Some Universals of Language Use, eighteen years later: review article’, Semiotica 109(1/2): 141–171Google Scholar
Gluckmann, M. 1962, Essays on the Ritual of Social Relations, Manchester: Manchester University Press
Goffman, E. 1955, ‘On face work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction’, Psychiatry 18: 213–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, E. 1956, ‘The nature of deference and demeanor’, American Anthropologist 58: 473–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books
Goffman, E. 1971, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin
Goffman, E. 1981, Forms of Talk, Oxford: Blackwell
Goodwin, C. and Heritage, J. 1990, ‘Conversation analysis’, Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, E. (ed.) 1978, Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Greif, E. and Gleason, J. 1980, ‘Hi, thanks and goodbye: more routine information’, Language in Society 9: 159–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. 1957, ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. 1969, ‘Utterer's meaning and intentions’, Philosophical Review 78(2): 147–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. 1975, ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41– 58
Grice, H. 1978, ‘Further notes on logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 9. Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 113–27
Grosperrin, J.-P. 1997, ‘La politesse des premiers ages: un aspect du primitivisme chrétien sous Louis XIV’, in Wild, F. (ed.), Regards sur le passé dans l'Europe des XVIe et XVIIe siècles, Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 397–406
Gu, Y. 1990, ‘Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guazzo, Stefano (1574) La ciuil conuersatione, Brescia: Appresso Tomaso Bozzola
Halliday, M. 1973, Explorations in the Functions of Language, London: Edward Arnold
Halliday, M. 1978, Language as a Social Semiotic: the Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold
Harman, G. 1971, ‘Three levels of meaning’, in Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–75
Haverkate, H. 1979, Impositive Sentences in Spanish: Theory and Description in Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins
Haverkate, H. 1984, Speech Acts, Speakers and Hearers: Reference and Referential Strategies in Spanish, Amsterdam: Benjamins
Haverkate, H. 1987, ‘La cortesía como estrategía conversacional’, Diálogos Hispanicos de Amsterdam 6: 27–63Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1988a, ‘Politeness strategies in verbal interaction: an analysis of directness and indirectness in speech acts’, Semiotica 71: 59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1988b, ‘Toward a typology of politeness strategy in communicative interaction’, Multilingua 7(4): 385–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1990, ‘Aspectos semioticos de la cortesía verbal’, Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 28: 27–40Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1991, ‘La cortesía verbal: accion, transaccion e interaccion’, Revista Argentina de Linguistica 7(2): 141–78Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1994a, ‘The dialogues of Don Quixote de la Mancha: a pragmalinguistic analysis within the framework of Gricean maxims, speech act theory, and politeness theory’, Poetics: Journal for Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts 22(3): 219–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1994b, ‘Review of Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: a Crosscultural Perspective by Maria Sifianou’, Language in Society 23(4): 584–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbig, G. 1973, Geschichte der neueren Sprachwissenschaft: Unter dem besonderen Aspekt der Grammatik-Theorie, Munich: Hueber
Held, G. 1987, ‘Danken – semantische, pragmatische und soziokulturelle Aspekte eines höflichen Sprechakts (gezeigt am Beispiel des Französischen)’, Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 13–14: 203–27Google Scholar
Held, G. 1988, ‘Osservazioni su strategie verbali di cortesia al servicio del ricevente’, in Mauro, T., Gensini, S. and Piemontese, M. (eds.), Dalla parte del ricevente: percezione, comprensione, interpretazione, Rome: Bulzoni, pp. 293–303
Held, G. 1989a, ‘Beziehungsarbeit und Konversationsanalyse am Beispiel eines Bittgesprächs’, Folia Linguistica 23: 405–31Google Scholar
Held, G. 1989b, ‘On the role of maximization in verbal politeness’, Multilingua 7(4): 167–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, G. 1991a, ‘Möglichkeiten der Entschärfung sozialer Übertretungs-handlungen’, in Stati, S., Weigand, E. and Hundsnurscher, F. (eds.) Dialoganalyse III. Teil I. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 319–39
Held, G. 1991b, ‘Sprechen als Ethnomethode’, in Dausendschön-Gay, U., Gülich, E. and Krafft, U. (eds.), Linguistische Interaktionsanalyse: Beiträge zum 20. Romanistentag 1987, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 155–69
Held, G. 1992a, ‘Aspekte des Zusammenhangs zwischen Höflichkeit und Sprache in der vorpragmatischen Sprachwissenschaft’, Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 108(1/2): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, G. 1992b, ‘Politeness in linguistic research’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 131–53
Held, G. 1995, Verbale Höflichkeit: Studien zur linguistischen Theorienbildung und empirische Untersuchung zum Sprachverhalten französischer und italienischer Jugendlicher in Bitt- und Danksituationen, Tübingen: Gunter Narr
Held, G. 1996, ‘Two polite speech acts in contrastive view: aspects of the realization of requesting and thanking in French and Italian’, in Hellinger, M. and Ammon, U. (eds.), Contrastive Sociolinguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 363–84
Held, G. 1999, ‘Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: reflections on the verbalization of social power relations’, Pragmatics 9(1): 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. 1990, ‘To wrap or not to wrap: politeness and penetration in ethnographic enquiry’, Man 24: 620–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. 1992, ‘Honorifics as dialect: the expression and manipulation of boundaries’, Multilingua 11(4): 341–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. 1993, Wrapping Culture: Politeness, Presentation and Power in Japan and Other Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Herbert, R. 1990, ‘Sex-based differences in compliment behavior’, Language in Society 19(2): 201–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, R. 1991, ‘The sociology of compliment work: an ethnocontrastive study of Polish and English compliments’, Multilingua 10(4): 381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, R. and Straight, H. 1989, ‘Compliment-rejection versus compliment-avoidance: listener-based versus speaker-based pragmatic strategies’, Language and Communication 9: 35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. 1986, ‘Universals of linguistic politeness: quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English’, Journal of Pragmatics 10(3): 347–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, D. 1976, ‘On the concept of face’, American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 867–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holly, W. 1979, Imagearbeit in Gesprächen. Zur linguistischen Beschreibung des Beziehungsaspekts, Tübingen: Niemeyer
Holmes, J. 1986, ‘Functions of you know in women's and men's speech’, Language in Society 15: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1989a, ‘Paying compliments: a sex preferential politeness strategy’, Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 445–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1989b, ‘Sex differences and apologies: one aspect of communicative competence’, Applied Linguistics 10(2): 194–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1990, ‘Apologies in New Zealand English’, Language in Society 19(2): 155–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1993, ‘New Zealand women are good to talk to: an analysis of politeness strategies in interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics 20(2): 91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1995, Women, Men and Politeness, London: Longman
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. 1997, ‘Good listeners: gender differences in New Zealand conversation’, Women and Language 20(2): 7–14Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. 1986, ‘Language structure in social interaction: perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(2): 305–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T. 1991, ‘Interpreting questions and replies: effects of face-threat, question form and gender’, Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T. 1992, ‘The linguistic realization of face management: implications for language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross-cultural communication’, Social Psychology Quarterly 55(2): 141–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T. 1997a, ‘Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks’, Memory and Cognition 25(1): 106–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T. 1997b, ‘“Yes, but …”: positive politeness in conversation arguments’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(2): 222–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T. and Yang, J. 1990, ‘Politeness as universal: cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(4): 719–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. (1993), Grammaticalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
House, J. 1988, ‘“Oh excuse me please …”: apologizing in a foreign language’, in Kettemann, B., Bierbaumer, P., Fill, A. and Karpf, A. (eds.), Englisch als Zweitsprache, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 303–27
House, J. 1989, ‘Politeness in English and German: the functions of please and bitte’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 96–119
House, J. and Kasper, G. 1981, ‘Politeness markers in English and German’, in Coulmas, F. (eds.), Conversational Routine, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 157–85
Hu, H. 1944, ‘The Chinese concepts of “face”’, American Anthropologist 46(1): 45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. 1986, ‘Discourse: scope without depth’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 57: 49–89Google Scholar
Ide, S. 1982, ‘Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women's language’, Lingua 57(2/4): 357–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, S. 1989, ‘Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 223–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, S. 1993, ‘Linguistic politeness, III: linguistic politeness and universality’, Multilingua 12(1)Google Scholar
Ide, S., Hori, M., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. 1986, ‘Sex difference and politeness in Japanese’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 58: 25–36Google Scholar
Ide, S., Hill, B., Cames, Y., Ogino, T. and Kawasaki, A. 1992, ‘The concept of politeness: an empirical study of American English and Japanese’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281–97
James, A. 1983, ‘“Well” in reporting clauses: meaning and form of a “lexical filler”, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 8(1): 33–40Google Scholar
Janney, R. and Arndt, H. 1992, ‘Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–41
Janney, R. and Arndt, H. 1993, ‘Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: a historical perspective’, Multilingua 12(1): 13–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, M. 1998, ‘Relevance theory and the communication of politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. 1973, ‘A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address in closing sequences’, Semiotica 9: 47–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. 1992, ‘Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts’, Applied Linguistics 13(1): 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. and Roen, D. 1992, ‘Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: gender variation’, Language in Society 21(1): 27–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B., Ferrara, K. and Bean, J. 1992, ‘Gender, politeness, and discourse management in same sex and cross-sex opinion-poll interviews’, Journal of Pragmatics 18(5): 405–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. 1988, ‘The relevance of politeness’, Multilingua 7(4): 375–84Google Scholar
Jucker, A. 1994, ‘Review of Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, edited by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich’, Multilingua 13(3): 329–34Google Scholar
Jucker, A. (ed.) 1997, The Social Dimension of Communication, special issue of Multilingua 16(2/3)
Kachru, Y. 1994, ‘Crosscultural speech act research and the classroom’, Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series 5: 39–51Google Scholar
Kakava, C. 1997, ‘Review article: Politeness and the particularities of requests (Review of Sifianou 1992)’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 181–98Google Scholar
Kamisli, S. and Dogançay, S. A. 1997, ‘Gender differences in conveying embarrassing information: examples from Turkish’, Women and Language 20(2): 25–33Google Scholar
Kasper, G. 1990, ‘Linguistic politeness: current research issues’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katriel, T. 1986, Talking Straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Keenan, E. C. 1976, ‘The universality of conversational postulates’, Language in Society 5: 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketcham, M. 1985, Transparent Designs: Reading, Performance, and Form in the Spectator Papers, Athens, GE: University of Georgia Press
Khanittanan, W. 1988, ‘Some observations on expressing politeness in Thai’, Language Sciences 10(2): 353–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, M. 1997, ‘Varieties of rudeness: types and functions of impolite utterances’, Functions of Language 4(2): 251–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, M. 1999, ‘Ideologies of politeness’, Pragmatics special issue 9(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. 1984, ‘The third Earl of Shaftesbury and the progress of politeness’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 18: 186–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. 1986, ‘Berkeley, Shaftesbury, and the meaning of politeness’, Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture 16: 57–68Google Scholar
Klein, L. 1990, ‘Politeness in seventeenth century England and France’, Cahiers du Dix-septième: an Interdisciplinary Journal 4(1): 91–106Google Scholar
Klein, L. 1992, ‘Courtly politesse and civic politeness in France and England’, Halcyon: a Journal of the Humanities 14: 171–81Google Scholar
Klein, L. 1994, Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Knapp-Potthoff, A. 1992, ‘Secondhand politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 203–18
Koike, D. 1989, ‘Requests and the role of deixis in politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 13(2): 187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koike, D. 1992, ‘Brazilian Portuguese directives and a hierarchy of strategies for politeness’, in Koike, D. (ed.), Romance Linguistics: the Portuguese Context, Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey, pp. 121–40
Koike, D. A. 1994, ‘Negation in Spanish and English suggestions and requests: mitigating effects?’, Journal of Pragmatics 21: 513–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H. 1993, ‘Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures’, Language in Society 22(2): 193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H. 1996, ‘Impoliteness and conversational joking: on relational politics’, Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 30(3–4): 299–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kummer, M. 1992, ‘Politeness in Thai’, in Watts, R., Ide, I. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 325–36
Kwarciak, B. J. 1991. Cognitive Aspects of the Child's Linguistic Politeness, Dissertation, Abstracts International, vol. 51 (11–13)
Kwarciak, B. J. 1993, ‘The acquisition of linguistic politeness and Brown and Levinson's theory’, Multilingua 12(1): 51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1975, Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
Lakoff, R. 1973a, ‘The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's’, Chicago Linguistics Society 8: 292–305Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1973b, ‘Questionable answers and answerable questions’, in Kachru, B. et al. (eds.), Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 453–67
Lakoff, R. 1975a, Language and Women's Place, New York: Harper
Lakoff, R. 1975b, ‘Language theory and the real world’, Language Learning 25(2): 309–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1977, ‘What you can do with words: politeness, pragmatics and performatives’, in Rogers, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics, pp. 79–105
Lakoff, R. 1979, ‘Stylistic strategies within a grammar of style’, in Orasanu, J., Slater, K. and Adler, L. (eds.), Language, Sex and Gender: Does la difference make a difference?, New York: The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 53–80
Lakoff, R. 1989, ‘The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 101–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, P. 1989, A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Lavandera, B. 1988, ‘The social pragmatics of politeness forms’, in Ammon, U., Dittmar, N. and Mattheier, K. (eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: an International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society/Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft, 2 volumes, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1196–205
Lee-Wong, S.-M. 1994a, ‘Imperatives in requests: direct or impolite: observations from Chinese’, Pragmatics 4(4): 491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Wong, S.-M. 1994b, ‘Qing/Please: a polite or requestive marker? observations from Chinese’, Multilingua 13(4): 343–60Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, S.-M. 1999, Politeness and Face in Chinese Culture, Frankfurt: Peter Lang
Leech, G. 1977, Language and Tact, L.A.U.T. Papers 46. University of Trier
Leech, G. 1980, Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins
Leech, G. 1983, Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman
Lerch, E. 1934, Modalität: Stimmführung und affektische Verkürzung, Leipzig: Reisland
Lim, T.-S. 1994, ‘Facework and interpersonal relationships’, in Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.), The Challenge of Facework. Albany NY: University of New York Press, pp. 209–29
Lim, T.-S. and Bowers, J. 1991, ‘Facework: solidarity, approbation, and tact’, Human Communication Research 17(3): 415–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R. 1987, ‘Critical review of Leech's Politeness Principle’, Foreign Language Teaching and Research 2 (70): 42–6Google Scholar
Magendie, M. 1970 [1924], La politesse mondaine et les théories de l'honnêteté en France au XVII e siècle, de 1600 à 1660, Geneva: Slatkine Reprints
Magli, P. 1992, ‘Mediocrita e bon ton passionale’, in Montandon, A. (ed.), Etiquette et politesse. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 43–55
Manes, J. and Wolfson, N. 1980, ‘The compliment as a social strategy’, Papers in Linguistics 13: 391–410Google Scholar
Manes, J. and Wolfson, N. 1981, ‘The compliment formula’, in Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational Routine. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 115–33
Mao, L. 1992, ‘Invitational discourse and Chinese identity’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 3(1): 70–96Google Scholar
Mao, L. R. 1994, ‘Beyond politeness theory: “face” revisited and renewed’, Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1988, ‘Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese’, Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 403–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1989, ‘Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 207–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1993, ‘Linguistic politeness and cultural style: observations from Japanese’, in Clancy, P. (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, II. Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information, pp. 55– 67
McIntosh, C. 1998, The Evolution of English Prose, 1700–1800: Style, Politeness, and Print Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mead, G. 1934, Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago: University of Chicago
Milroy, L. 1980, Language and Social Networks, Oxford: Blackwell
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1991, Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation, 2nd edition, London: Routledge
Montandon, A. (ed.), 1992. Etiquette et politesse. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand
Mugglestone, L. 1995, ‘Talking Proper’: the Rise of Accent as Social Symbol, Oxford: Clarendon
Mühlhäusler, P. and Harré, R. 1990, Pronouns and People: the Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity, Oxford: Blackwell
Mursy, A. and Wilson, J. 2001, ‘Towards a definition of Egyptian complimenting’, Multilingua 20(2): 133–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, M. 1998, ‘Gender enactment on a first date: a Japanese sample’, Women and Language 21(1): 10–17Google Scholar
Ng, S. H. and Bradac, J. J. 1993, Power in Language, Newbury Park: Sage
Norton, H. 1900, A Courtesy Book for Older Girls and Boys, London
Nwoye, O. 1989, ‘Linguistic politeness in Igbo’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 249–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwoye, O. 1992, ‘Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face’, Journal of Pragmatics 18(4): 309–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Driscoll, J. 1996, ‘About face: a defence and elaboration of universal dualism’, Journal of Pragmatics 25(1): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, E. 1983, ‘Apologies across languages’, in Blum-Kulka, S., House J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex, pp. 155–74
Olshtain, E. and Cohen, A. 1983, ‘Apology: a speech act set’, in Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House: 18–36
Olshtain, E. and Weinbach, L. 1987, ‘Complaints: a study of speech act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew’, in Verschueren, J. and Bertucelli-Papi, M. (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 195–208
Owen, M. 1983, Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: a Study of Language Use in Social Interaction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Patrizi, G. 1992, ‘Il valore della norma. Etichetta come comunicazione e rappresentazione tra Cortegiano e Galateo’, in Montandon, A. (ed.), Etiquette et politesse. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 33–42
Penman, R. 1990, ‘Facework and politeness: multiple goals in courtroom discourse’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(1/2): 15–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, R. 1994, ‘Facework in communication: conceptual and moral challenges’, in Ting-Toomey, S. (eds.), The Challenge of Facework, Albany NY: University of New York Press, pp. 15–45
Pocock, J. 1985, Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Potkay, Adam 1994, The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume, Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Power, T. G. and Shanks, J. A. 1989, ‘Parents as socializers: maternal and paternal views’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 18(2): 203–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman
Rathmayr, R. 1996a, Pragmatik der Entschuldigungen. Vergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel der russischen Sprache und Kultur, Cologne: Böhlau Verlag
Rathmayr, R. 1996b, ‘Sprachliche Höflichkeit. Am Beispiel expliziter und impliziter Höflichkeit im Russischen’, in Girke, W. (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik 1995, Munich: Böhlan Verlag, pp. 362–91
Rathmayr, R. 1999, ‘Métadiscours et réalité linguistique: l'exemple de la politesse russe’, Pragmatics 9(1): 75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. 1979. ‘The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language’, in Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 284–324
Ross, J. 1970, ‘On declarative sentences’, in Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, R. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Waltham, Mass.: Ginn, pp. 222–72
Rundquist, S. 1992, ‘Indirectness: a gender study of flouting Grice's maxims’, Journal of Pragmatics 18: 431–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. 1992, Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II, edited by Gail Jefferson, Oxford: Blackwell
Santosuosso, A. 1979, The Bibliography of Giovanni Della Casa: Books, Readers and Critics, 1537–1975, Florence: L. S. Olschki
Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S. 1991, ‘Non-cooperation in communication: a reassessment of Gricean pragmatics’, Journal of Pragmatics 17: 117–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, M. 1992, ‘Review of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies edited by S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper’, Journal of Pragmatics 17(3): 267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1987, Discourse Markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schmidt, R. 1980, ‘Review of Esther Goody, ed., Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction’, Regional English Language Centre Journal 11: 100–14Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1970, Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Searle, J. (ed.) 1972, The Philosophy of Language, London: Oxford University Press
Shaftesbury, 3rd Earl of, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1711, Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times: An Enquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit, London
Shibamoto, J. 1985, Japanese Women's Language, London: Academic Press
Shibamoto, J. 1994, ‘Review of Wrapping Culture: Politeness, Presentation, and Power in Japan and Other Societies by Joy Hendry’, Contemporary Sociology 23(4): 608Google Scholar
Shu, D. and Wang, H. 1993, ‘Complimenting and belittling acts in interpersonal rhetoric and politeness principle’, Waiguoyu, Beijing 3(85): 7–13Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. 1992a, Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece, Oxford: Clarendon
Sifianou, M. 1992b, ‘The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English’, Journal of Pragmatics 17: 155–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. 1993, ‘Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition’, Multilingua 12(1): 69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. 1995, ‘Do we need to be silent to be extremely polite? Silence and FTAs’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(1): 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. 1997a, ‘Politeness and off-record indirectness’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 163–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. 1997b, ‘Silence and politeness’, in Jaworski, A. (eds.), Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63–84
Sifianou, M. 1989, ‘On the telephone again. Differences in telephone behaviour: England versus Greece’, Language in Society 18(4): 527–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. 1900, Die Philosophie des Geldes, Leipzig: Dunker & Humbolt
Smith, J. 1997, ‘Review of Joy Hendry, Wrapping Culture’, Language in Society 26(2): 312–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, O. 1984, The Politics of Language 1791–1819, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Snow, C., Perlmann, R., Gleason, J. and Hooshyar, N. 1990, ‘Developmental perspectives on politeness: sources of children's knowledge’, Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson D. 1995, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell
Spitzer, L. 1922, Italienische Umgangssprache, Bonn: Schröder
Stalpers, J. 1992, ‘Between matter-of-factness and politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 219–30
Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.) 1970, Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–5
Steppat, M. 1994, ‘Social change and gender decorum: Renaissance courtesy’, in Carré, J. (ed.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900. Leiden: Brill, pp. 27–40
Strecker, I. 1993, ‘Cultural variations in the concept of “face”’, Multilingua 12(2): 119–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J. 1980, ‘Well in conversation’, in Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (eds.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, London: Longman, 167–77
Thompson, S. and Mulac, A. 1991, ‘The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English’, Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. 1994a, ‘Face and facework: Theoretical and research issues’, in Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.), The Challenge of Facework: Cross-Cultural and Interpersonal Issues. Albany NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 307–40
Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.) 1994b, The Challenge of Facework, Albany NY: University of New York Press
Tirkkonen-Condit, S. 1996, ‘Explicitness vs. implicitness of argumentation: An intercultural comparison’, Multilingua 15(3): 257–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomoda, S. 1991, ‘Cost and Benefit in Language Use: a Case Study of Sentence Particles in Japanese’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona
Trosborg, Anna 1987 ‘Apology strategies in natives/nonnatives’, Journal of Pragmatics 11: 147–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtl, K. 1986, Erziehung zur Höflichkeit: Höflichkeit als Wertkonzept der Alltagsinteraktion, als Gegenstand empirischer Forschung in den Humanwissenschaften und als Aufgabe der Erziehung, Regensburg
Wartenberg, T. 1991. The Forms of Power: From Domination to Transformation, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
Walper, S. and Valtin, R. 1992, ‘Children's understanding of white lies’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231– 51
Watts, R. 1987, ‘Relevance in conversational moves: a reappraisal of well’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 19: 37–59Google Scholar
Watts, R. 1989a, ‘The perceptual salience of discourse markers in conversation’, in Weydt, H. (ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 601–20
Watts, R. 1989b, ‘Taking the pitcher to the well: native speakers’ perceptions of their use of discourse markers in conversation', Journal of Pragmatics 13, 203–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. 1989c, ‘Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior’, Multilingua 8(2/3): 131–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. 1991, Power in Family Discourse, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Watts, R. 1992, ‘Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43–69
Watts, R. 1994, ‘Planning in-service training courses: institutional constraints and non-native EFL teachers’ perceptions', International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4: 19–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. 1997a, ‘Silence and the acquisition of status in verbal interaction’, in Jaworski, A. (ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 87–115
Watts, R. 1997b, ‘Relevance theory and verbal interruptions: assessing discourse status’, in Jucker, A. H. (ed.), The Social Dimension of Communication, special issue of Multilingua 16(2/3): 153–86
Watts, R. 1999a, ‘Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain’, Pragmatics 9(1): 5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. 1999b, ‘The social construction of Standard English: grammar writers as a “discourse community”’, in Bex, A. and Watts, R. (eds.), Standard English: the Widening Debate, London: Routledge, pp. 40–68
Watts, R. 2002, ‘From polite language to educated language: the re-emergence of an ideology’, in Watts, R. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Alternative Histories of English, London: Routledge, 155–72
Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. 1992a, Introduction, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–17
Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.) 1992b, Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Watts, R. and Trudgill, P. (eds.) 2002, Alternative Histories of English, London: Routledge
Weinrich, H. 1986, Lügt man im Deutschen, wenn man höflich ist? Mannheim: Dudenverlag
Werkhofer, K. 1992, ‘Traditional and modern views: the social constitution and the power of politeness’, in Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 155–99
Wierzbicka, A. 1985, ‘Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs English’, Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1991a, Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: the Semantics of Human Interaction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Wierzbicka, A. 1991b, ‘Japanese key words and core cultural values’, Language in Society 20: 333–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildeblood, J. 1965, The Polite World: a Guide to English Manners and Deportment from the Thirteenth to the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wilhite, M. 1983, ‘Children's acquisition of language routines: the end-of-the-meal routine in Cakchiquel’, Language in Society 12(1): 47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1978, ‘On Grice's theory of conversation’, Pragmatics Microfiche 3: 5Google Scholar
Woodhouse, J. 1994, ‘The tradition of Della Casa's Galateo in English’, in Carré, J. (eds.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900, Leiden: Brill, pp. 11–23
Yang, Y.-L. 1988, ‘The English pronoun of address: a matter of self-compensation’, Sociolinguistics 17(2): 157–80Google Scholar
Yli-Jokipii, H. 1994, Requests in Professional Discourse: a Cross-Cultural Study of British, American and Finnish Business Writing, Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia
Ziff, P. 1971, ‘On H. P. Grice's account of meaning’, in Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–5

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Richard J. Watts, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Politeness
  • Online publication: 24 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Richard J. Watts, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Politeness
  • Online publication: 24 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Richard J. Watts, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Politeness
  • Online publication: 24 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184.014
Available formats
×