Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:46:34.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2023

Christopher S. van den Berg
Christopher S. van den Berg
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics and Poetics of Cicero's Brutus
The Invention of Literary History
 , pp. 256 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Adamietz, J. (ed.) (1966) Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber iii. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Allen, W. (1954) “Cicero’s Conceit,” TAPhA 85: 121–44.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2016) The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy: Platonis aemulus and the Invention of Cicero. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
André, J. M. (1966) L’otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine: des origines à l’époque augustéenne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Assenmaker, P. (2007) “‘Pignus salutis atque imperii’: l’enjeu du Palladium dans les luttes politiques de la fin de la République,” LEC 75: 381–412.Google Scholar
Assenmaker, P. (2010) “La place du Palladium dans l’idéologie augustéenne: entre mythologie, religion et politique,” in Baglioni, I. (ed.), Storia delle religioni e archeologia: discipline a confronto. Rome: Alpes Italia. 35–64.Google Scholar
Assfahl, G. (1932) Vergleich und Metapher bei Quintilian. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2018) Roman Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. H. (1934) Literary Criticism in Antiquity: A Sketch of Its Development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aubert, S. (2010) “La polémique ciceronienne contre Atticistes et Stoiciens autour de la santé du style,” in Chiron, P. and Lévy, C. (eds.), Les noms du style dans l’antiquité gréco-latine. Louvain; Walpole, MA: Peeters. 87–111.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2014) “La rhétorique du Stoïcien Rutilius Rufus dans le Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.), 123–40.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. and Guérin, C. (eds.) (2014) Le Brutus de Cicéron: rhétorique, politique et histoire culturelle. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. (1964) Studies in Greek and Roman History. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1967) Review of E. Malcovati: Cicero, Brutus; and A. E. Douglas: Cicero, Brutus, JRS 57: 223–30.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1969) “Quaestiones Variae,” Historia 18: 447–91.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1972) “Ennius and His Friends,” in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius. Geneva: Fondation Hardt. 149–208.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, M., tr. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Balbo, A. (2013) “Marcus Junius Brutus the Orator: Between Philosophy and Rhetoric,” in Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford University Press. 315–28.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, E. J. W. (1992) “The Peplos of Athena,” in Neils, J. (ed.), Goddess and Polis: The Panathenaic Festival in Ancient Athens. Princeton University Press. 103–17.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. (1962) Nevio epico. Padua: Cedam.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1963) Das rednerische Bildungsideal Ciceros. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2007) The Roman Triumph. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. (2013) “Quousque tandem … ?” (review of Everitt 2001), in Confronting the Classics: Traditions, Adventures, and Innovations. New York: Liveright. 79–87.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2005) Karriere und Hierarchie: die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des Cursus Honorum in der mittleren Republik. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Bell, A. J. E. (1997) “Cicero and the Spectacle of Power,” JRS 87: 1–22.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. (2003) “The Early Augustan Calendars in Rome and Egypt,” ZPE 142: 221–40.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. (1998) Ludi Publici: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Berthold, H. (1965) “Die Gestalt des Themistokles bei M. Tullius Cicero,” Klio 43: 38–48.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2015) “Roman Plato or Roman Demosthenes? The Bifurcation of Cicero in Ancient Scholarship,” in Altman, W. H. F (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero. Leiden: Brill. 283–306.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2019) Cicero, Greek Learning, and the Making of a Roman Classic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2011) “Die Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar,” in Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (eds.), Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom. Stuttgart: Steiner. 55–80.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. P. (2008) “Cicero’s Minerva, Penates, and the Mother of the Lares: An Outline of Roman Domestic Religion,” in Bodel, J. P. and Olyan, S. M. (eds.), Household and Family Religion in Antiquity. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell. 248–75.Google Scholar
Bolonyai, G. (1993) “Iudicium docti indoctique,” AAntHung 34: 103–37.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1979) “Historical Problems in Late Republican and Augustan Classicism,” in Flashar, (ed.), 57–78.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1940) “Sur Cicéron et l’histoire (Brutus, 41–43),” REA 42: 388–92.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1941) “Cum dignitate otium,” REA 43: 172–91.Google Scholar
Bréguet, E. (1967) “A propos de quelques exemples historiques dans le De re publica de Cicéron, I, 3, 5–6,” Latomus 26: 597–608.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. (2000) The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. (2014) “Power and Process under the Republican ‘Constitution,’” in Flower, H. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. 19–53.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (1971) Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on Poetry: Epistles, Book II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1989) “Quintilian’s De Causis Corruptae Eloquentiae and Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 39: 472–503.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1988) The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1973) The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cadario, M. (2006) “Le statue di Cesare a Roma tra il 46 e il 44 a.C.: la celebrazione della vittoria e il confronto con Alessandro e Romolo,” Acme 59: 25–70.Google Scholar
Cape, R. W. (2002) “Cicero’s Consular Speeches,” in May, (ed.), 113–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castorina, E. (1952) L’atticismo nell’evoluzione del pensiero di Cicerone. Catania: Giannotta.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A. (1998) “La funzione di Ortensio nel prologo del Brutus,” Lexis 16: 149–62.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A. (2012) “Coscienza del progresso e consapevolezza del presente: Cicerone, Brutus 22–23,” in Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e civitas: transizioni dalla Repubblica all’Impero: in ricordo di Emanuele Narducci. Pisa: ETS. 99–115.Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A. (2018) “Gaius Titius, Orator and Poeta. (Cic. Brut. 167 and Macrob. Sat. 3.16.4–16),” in Gray, et al. (eds.), 153–70.Google Scholar
Charrier, S. (2003) “Les années 90–80 dans le Brutus de Cicéron (§§ 304–312): la formation d’un orateur au temps des guerres civiles,” REL 81: 79–96.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (2003) “La naissance de l’autobiographie à Rome: laus sui ou apologia de vita sua?” REL 81: 65–78.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. (2014) “Démétrios de Phalère dans le Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.) 105–20.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. (1922) Römische Studien. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2001) “Affermazioni di priorità e coscienza di progresso artistico nei poeti latini,” in Schmidt, E. A. (ed.), L’histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine. Geneva: Fondation Hardt. 267–314.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2005) “Orazio, Cicerone, e il tempo della letteratura,” in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.), La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne / Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung. Heidelberg: Winter. 123–39.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2006) “The Concept of the Classical and the Canons of Model Authors in Roman Literature,” in Porter, J. I. (ed.), Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton University Press. 204–34.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2013) “Horace’s Epistle 2.1, Cicero, Varro, and the Ancient Debate about the Origins and the Development of Latin Poetry,” in Farrell, J. A. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press. 180–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbeill, A. P. (2001) “Education in the Roman Republic: Creating Traditions,” in Too, Y. L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden: Brill. 261–87.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. P. (2018a) “Anticato,” in Grillo, and Krebs, (eds.), 215–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbeill, A. P. (2018b) “Clodius’ Contio de haruspicum responsis,” in Gray, et al. (eds.), 171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. (1993) Form as Argument in Cicero’s Speeches: A Study of Dilemma. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Crane, R. S. (1971) Critical and Historical Principles of Literary History. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. (1984) M. Tullius Cicero: The Lost and Unpublished Orations. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. (ed.) (1994) M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches: An Edition with Commentary, 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1995) Legal Advocacy in the Roman World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Culham, P. (1989) “Archives and Alternatives in Republican Rome,” CPh 134: 100–15.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1953) Varros Schrift De poematis und die hellenistisch-römische Poetik. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1962) Studien zu Varro De poetis. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1963) “Zu Varros Literaturforschung, besonders in ‘De poetis,’” in Dahlmann, H. et al. (eds.), Varron. Geneva: Fondation Hardt. 1–31.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. and Heisterhagen, R. (1957) Varronische Studien I: zu den Logistorici. Mainz: Steiner.Google Scholar
D’Alton, J. F. (1931) Roman Literary Theory and Criticism: A Study in Tendencies. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
D’Ambra, E. (1996) “The Calculus of Venus: Nude Portraits of Roman Matrons,” in Kampen, N. B. (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art: Near East, Egypt, Greece, and Italy. Cambridge University Press. 219–32.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (1994) “Caesar’s Practical Prose,” CJ 89: 183–95.Google Scholar
Dangel, J. (ed. and tr.) (1995) Accius: Oeuvres (Fragments). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. (1984) “Il problema delle origini della poesia latina nel Brutus di Cicerone,” Ciceroniana 5: 81–90.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. (1996) “La cronologia dei poeti latini arcaici in Cicerone,” in Per Enrica Malcovati: atti del convegno di studi nel centenario della nascita. Como: New Press. 91–104.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1992) Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la République romaine. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (2014) “La function des modèles dans l’articulation chronologique du Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.), 19–38.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (1980) Studi su Accio. Florence: CLUSF.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1950) “Elegantia Caesaris: zu Caesars Reden und ‘Commentarii.’” Gymnasium 57: 112–23.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2013) “Longinus 36.3: The Faulty Colossus and Plato’s Phaedrus,” Trends in Classics 5: 318–40.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2014) “The Attic Muse and the Asian Harlot: Classicizing Allegories in Dionysius and Longinus,” in Pieper, C. and Ker, J. (eds.), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Leiden: Brill. 388–409.Google Scholar
Delarue, F. (1982) “L’asianisme à Rome,” REL 60: 166–85.Google Scholar
de Man, P. (1970) “Literary History and Literary Modernity,” Daedalus 99: 384–404.Google Scholar
de Man, P. (1986) The Resistance to Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2009) “The Roman Historians and Twentieth-century Approaches to Roman History,” in Feldherr, (ed.), 394–406.Google Scholar
Desmouliez, A. (1952) “Sur la polémique de Cicéron et des atticistes,” REL 30: 168–85.Google Scholar
Desmouliez, A. (1982) “A propos du jugement de Cicéron sur Caton l’ancien (Brutus XVI–XVIII 63–69 et LXXXV–LXXXVII 292–300),” Philologus 126: 70–89.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, M. H. (1992) Perdita iuventus: zwischen den Generationen von Caesar und Augustus. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1957) “Analogie und Attizismus,” Hermes 85: 170–205.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1977) “Der Beginn des Attizismus,” A&A 23: 162–77.Google Scholar
Döpp, S. (2008) “Klassik in lateinischer Literatur: antike Ansätze zur Konstituierung der Epoche,” Gymnasium 115: 47–67.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1955a) “M. Calidius and the Atticists,” CQ 5: 241–47.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1955b) “The Aristotelian Συναγωγὴ Τεχνῶν after Cicero, Brutus, 46–48,” Latomus 14: 536–39.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1966a) M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1966b) “Oratorum Aetates,” AJPh 87: 290–306.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1973) “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorica: A Study in Method,” ANRW 1/3: 95–138.Google Scholar
Driediger-Murphy, L. G. (2019) Roman Republican Augury: Freedom and Control. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Due, B. (1989) The Cyropaedia: Xenophon’s Aims and Methods. Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2012) “Scriptum and voluntas in Cicero’s Brutus,” in Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e civitas: transizioni dalla Repubblica all’Impero: in ricordo di Emanuele Narducci. Pisa: ETS. 117–28.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2018) “Netting the Wolf-Fish: Gaius Titius in Macrobius and Cicero,” in Gray, et al. (eds.), 135–48.Google Scholar
Dupraz, E. (2007) “Appius Claudius Caecus comme fondateur de la littérature latine,” in Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C. (eds.), Commencer et finir: débuts et fins dans les littératures grecque, latine et néolatine. Lyon: Éditions CERGR. 21–42.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2003) A Commentary on Cicero, De legibus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2008) “Rivals into Partners: Hortensius and Cicero,” Historia 57: 142–73.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2012) Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speeches on Behalf of Marcus Fonteius and Marcus Aemilius Scaurus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. (1967) The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2018) “Roman Orators between Greece and Rome: The Case of Cato the Elder, L. Crassus, and M. Antonius,” in Gray, et al. (eds.), 19–32.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. (1967) The Idea of Progress in Classical Antiquity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eden, P. T. (1962) “Caesar’s Style: Inheritance versus Intelligence,” Glotta 40: 74–117.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2013) Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D. (1528 [1986]) Dialogus Ciceronianus, tr. Knott, B. I., in Levi, A. H. T. (ed.), Collected Works of Erasmus, vol. xxviii. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Everitt, A. (2001) Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome’s Greatest Politician. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. (1981) Seneca the Elder. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1977) “Cicero, Varro, and M. Claudius Marcellus,” Phoenix 31: 208–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978a) “Imitation and Evolution: The Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero De Oratore 2. 87–97 and Some Related Problems of Ciceronian Theory,” CPh 73: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978b) “Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ,” CPh 73: 102–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1979) “On the Use of Genus-Terminology in Cicero’s Rhetorical Works,” Hermes 107: 441–59.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1981) “The Synchronistic Chapter of Gellius (NA 17.21) and Some Aspects of Roman Chronology and Cultural History between 60 and 50 B.C.,” LCM 6: 7–17.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1988) “Varietas and satietas: De oratore 3.96–103 and the Limits of ornatus,” Rhetorica 6: 275–90.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (2006) Review of J. Dugan, Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Hermathena 181: 249–52.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. A. (2003) “Classical Genre in Theory and Practice,” New Literary History 34: 383–408.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. A. (2010) “Literary Criticism,” in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford University Press. 176–87.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2002) “Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus,” in Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. C. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge University Press. 172–86.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2005) “The Beginnings of a Literature in Latin: Review Article,” JRS 95: 226–40.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2010) “Time and Calendar,” in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford University Press. 882–94.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filbey, E. J. (1911) “Concerning the Oratory of Brutus,” CPh 6: 325–33.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2016) Variety: The Life of a Roman Concept. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. (2003) Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. (ed.) (1979) Le classicisme à Rome aux Iers siècles avant et après J.-C. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2010) Roman Republics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2014) “Memory and Memoirs in Republican Rome,” in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 27–40.Google Scholar
Fogel, J. (2007) “The Descent of Style in Cicero’s Brutus,” Scholia 16: 42–68.Google Scholar
Föllinger, S. and Müller, G. M. (eds.) (2013) Der Dialog in der Antike: Formen und Funktionen einer literarischen Gattung zwischen Philosophie, Wissensvermittlung und dramatischer Inszenierung. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1988) “Benevolentiam conciliare and animos permovere: Some Remarks on Cicero’s De Oratore 2.178–216,” Rhetorica 6: 259–73.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2007) Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2009) “Heraclides of Pontus and the Philosophical Dialogue,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Pender, E. (eds.), Heraclides of Pontus: Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. 41–68.Google Scholar
Frampton, S. (2019) Empire of Letters: Writing in Roman Literature and Thought from Lucretius to Ovid. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frazel, T. D. (2009) The Rhetoric of Cicero’s In Verrem. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Frisch, P. (1985) “Cicero, Brutus 218–219 – eine Episode mit Widerhaken,” ZPE 58: 297–99.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989) Truth and Method, 2nd ed., tr. rev. Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2002) Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of the Sophists. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. N. (1995) “Cicero’s Response to the Philosophers in De oratore, Book 1,” in Horner, W. B. and Leff, M. (eds.), Rhetoric and Pedagogy: Its History, Philosophy, and Practice: Essays in Honor of James J. Murphy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 43–56.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. and Greenblatt, S. (2000) Practicing New Historicism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. (2012) Caesar’s De analogia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geffcken, K. A. (1973) Comedy in the Pro Caelio, with an Appendix on the In Clodium et Curionem. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1938) “Ciceros Brutus als politische Kundgebung,” Philologus 93: 128–31.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (2014) Cicero: ein biographischer Versuch, 3rd ed., ed. Riess, W.. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Gelzer, T. (1975) “Klassik und Klassizismus,” Gymnasium 82: 147–73.Google Scholar
Gelzer, T. (1979) “Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus,” in Flashar, (ed.), 1–41.Google Scholar
Gera, D. L. (1993) Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre, and Literary Technique. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Steel, C. (2010) “The Indistinct Literary Careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger,” in Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds.), Classical Literary Careers and Their Reception. Oxford University Press. 118–37.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2003) “The ‘Annalist’ before the Annalists: Ennius and His Annales,” in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds.), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen, Autoren, Kontexte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 93–114.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013a) “Of Cicero’s Plato: Fictions, Forms, Foundations,” in Schofield, (ed.), 225–75.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013b) “Cicero’s Dialogues: Historiography Manqué and the Evidence of Fiction,” in Föllinger, and Müller, (eds.), 225–74.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2018) “A Republic in Letters: Epistolary Communities in Cicero’s Correspondence, 49–44 BCE,” in Ceccarelli, P., Doering, L., Fögen, T., and Gildenhard, I. (eds.), Letters and Communities: Studies in the Socio-political Dimensions of Ancient Epistolography. Oxford University Press. 205–38.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. (2004) “Ovid’s ‘Hecale’: Deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses,” JRS 94: 47–72.Google Scholar
Goh, I. (2018) “An Asianist Sensation: Horace on Lucilius as Hortensius,” AJPh 139: 641–74.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1995) Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2005) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and Its Reception. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2006) “Ennius after the Banquet,” Arethusa 39: 427–47.Google Scholar
Goltz, A. (2000) “Maiestas sine viribus: die Bedeutung der Lictoren für die Konfliktbewältigungsstrategien römischer Magistrate,” in Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Steiner. 237–67.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1960) “Vasari’s Lives and Cicero’s Brutus,” JWI 23: 309–11.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1966) “The Debate on Primitivism in Ancient Rhetoric,” JWI 29: 24–38.Google Scholar
Gorak, J. (1997) “Canons and Canon Formation,” in Nisbet, H. B. and Rawson, C. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. iv: The Eighteenth Century. Cambridge University Press. 560–84.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1974) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophie. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1988) “From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the Background of Cicero’s De oratore,” Rhetorica 6: 215–35.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1979) Cicero’s Elegant Style: An Analysis of the Pro Archia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1984) “Towards a Practical Criticism of Caesar’s Prose Style,” ICS 9: 1–18.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1993) Cicero’s Caesarian Speeches: A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (2002) “Cicero’s Caesarian Orations,” in May, (ed.), 219–71.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2000) “Memory and Silence in Cicero’s Brutus,” Eranos 98: 39–64.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2013) “Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period,” in C. Steel, (ed.), 233–50.Google Scholar
Granatelli, R. (1990) “L’in utramque partem disserendi exercitatio nell’evoluzione del pensiero retorico e filosofico dell’antichità,” Vichiana, 3rd ser., 1–2: 165–81.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002) Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. (eds.) (2018) Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenidge, A. H. J. (1901) The Legal Procedure of Cicero’s Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2017) “Literary History! The Case of Ancient Greek Literature,” in Grethlein, and Rengakos, (eds.), 11–29.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) (2017) Griechische Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: Traditionen, Probleme und Konzepte. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (ed.) (2009) A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2012) The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.) (2018) The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1966) “Political Prosecutions in the 90’s B.C.,” Historia 15: 32–64.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1967) “Cicero and Licinius Calvus,” HSPh 71: 215–33.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1968) Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1974) The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1991) “The Exercise of Power in the Roman Republic,” in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. A. and Emle, J. (eds.), City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy: Athens and Rome, Florence and Venice. Stuttgart: Steiner. 251–67.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Guérin, C. (2011) Persona: l’élaboration d’une notion rhétorique au Ier siècle av. J.-C., vol. ii: Théorisation cicéronienne de la persona oratoire. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Guérin, C. (2014) “Oratorum bonorum duo genera sunt: la définition de l’excellence stylistique et ses conséquences théoriques dans le Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.), 161–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérin, C. (2015) La voix de la vérité: témoin et témoignage dans les tribunaux romains du Ier siècle avant J.-C. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. A. (2012) Work in Progress: Literary Revision as Social Performance in Ancient Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2014) “Contests of Style and Uses of the Middle in Canon Making,” in Cojannot-Le Blanc, M., Pouzadoux, C., and Prioux, É. (eds.), L’héroïque et le champêtre 2: appropriation et déconstruction des théories stylistiques dans la pratique des artistes et dans les modalités d’exposition des œuvres. Nanterre: Press Universitaires de Paris Ouest. 15–31.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (2005) The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Haenni, P. R. (1905) Die litterarische Kritik in Ciceros “Brutus.” Diss. University of Fribourg.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2009) “Serving the Times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator,” in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A. (eds.), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden: Brill. 89–110.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2014) “Cicero’s Brutus and the Criticism of Oratorical Performance,” CJ 110: 43–59.Google Scholar
Hall, U. (1990) “Greeks and Romans and the Secret Ballot,” in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 191–99.Google Scholar
Hall, U. (1998) “Species libertatis: Voting Procedure in the Late Roman Republic,” in Austin, M. M., Harries, J., and Smith, C. J. (eds.), Modus operandi: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Rickman. Institute of Classical Studies, University of London. 15–30.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. (2005) The Roman Nude: Heroic Portrait Statuary, 200 BC–AD 300. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1986) Aristotle’s Poetics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hanchey, D. (2013) “Otium as Civic and Personal Stability in Cicero’s Dialogues,” CW 106: 171–97.Google Scholar
Hantos, T. (1988) Res publica constituta: die Verfassung des Dictators Sulla. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1979) War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, C. M. (1995) The Aphrodite of Knidos and Her Successors. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldmann, K. (1982) Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1972) Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République, 2nd ed. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1904) “The Peripatetic Mean of Style and the Three Stylistic Characters,” AJPh 25: 125–46.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1906) “Literary Sources in Cicero’s Brutus and the Technique of Citation in Dialogue,” AJPh 27: 184–99.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1926) “Cicero’s Correspondence with Brutus and Calvus on Oratorical Style,” AJPh 47: 234–58.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1962) Brutus, in Cicero: Brutus; Orator, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2–293.Google Scholar
Hesberg, H. von (1998) “Minerva Custos Urbis: zum Bildschmuck der Porta Romana in Ostia,” in Kneissl, P. and Losemann, V. (eds.), Imperium Romanum: Studien zur Geschichte und Rezeption: Festschrift für Karl Christ zum 75. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: Steiner. 370–78.Google Scholar
Hiebel, D. (2009) Rôles institutionnel et politique de la contio sous la république romaine (287–49 av. J.-C.). Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (2010)“Between Historicism and Formalism,” in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford University Press. 369–85.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog: ein literarhistorischer Versuch. 2 vols. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. (2017) “‘A Faded Reflection of the Gracchi’: Ethics, Eloquence and the Problem of Sulpicius in Cicero’s De Oratore,” CQ 67: 163–81.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1995) “Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik,” in Jehne, M. (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Steiner. 11–49.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2010) Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011a) “Self-Serving Sermons: Oratory and the Self-Construction of the Republican Aristocrat,” in Smith, C. and Covino, R. (eds.), Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 17–34.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011b) “The Roman Republic as Theatre of Power: The Consuls as Leading Actors,” in Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. 161–81.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.) (2017) Libera Res Publica: die politische Kultur des antiken Rom: Positionen und Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1976) “The Collegium Poetarum,” BICS 23: 79–95.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (1999) “Die zweite Begegnung Roms mit den Griechen; oder: zu politischen Ursachen des Attizismus,” in Vogt-Spira, G., Rommel, B., and Musäus, I. (eds.), Rezeption und Identität: die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart: Steiner. 274–88.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (2006) Der philosophische Dialog: eine Poetik und Hermeneutik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (2008) “Cicero’s Plato,” WS 121: 145–70.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2004) “Numa et Pythagore: vie et mort d’un mythe,” in Deproost, P.-A. and Meurant, A. (eds.), Images d’origines, origines d’une image: hommages à Jacques Poucet. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia Bruylant. 125–37.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2005) Appius Claudius Caecus: la République accomplie. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2009) “Rome et l’Italie dans le discours d’Appius Claudius Caecus contre Pyrrhus,” Pallas 79: 203–20.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013) Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1978) “Phidias and Cicero, Brutus 70,” CQ 28: 470–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, D. C. (2003) “Metaphor, Simile, and Allegory as Ornaments of Style,” in Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.), Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford University Press. 7–27.Google Scholar
Jacotot, M. (2014) “De republica esset silentium: pensée politique et histoire de l’éloquence dans le Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.), 193–214.Google Scholar
Jahn, O., Kroll, W., and Kytzler, B. (1964) Brutus, 7th ed. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jastrow, J. (1900) Fact and Fable in Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. (1982) Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (2014) “From ‘Dialogos’ to Dialogue: The Use of the Term from Plato to the Second Century CE,” GRBS 54: 17–36.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. (forthcoming) Greek Dialogue in Antiquity: Post-Platonic Transformations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (1993) “Geheime Abstimmung und Bindungswesen in der römischen Republik,” HZ 257: 593–613.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1969) “The Poet Cn. Naevius, P. Cornelius Scipio, and R. Caecilius Metellus,” Antichthon 3: 32–47.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2009) “The Ancient Book,” in Bagnall, R. S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford University Press. 256–81.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2012) Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1970) “Cicero’s Cato,” RhM 113: 188–96.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. (1939) “Cicero’s Accuracy of Characterization in His Dialogues,” AJPh 60: 307–25.Google Scholar
Jucker, H. (1950) Vom Verhältnis der Römer zur bildenden Kunst der Griechen. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1995) C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1998) “Becoming ‘CICERO,’” in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (eds.), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart: Teubner. 248–63.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2005) Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2006) Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2020) Cicero: Brutus and Orator. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. J. (2018) The Reception of Cicero in the Early Roman Empire: The Rhetorical Schoolroom and the Creation of a Cultural Legend. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1999) “Slender Verse: Roman Elegy and Ancient Rhetorical Theory,” Mnemosyne 52: 41–62.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kenty, J. (2018) “The Political Context of Cicero’s Oration De domo sua,” Ciceroniana, n.s. 2/2: 245–64.Google Scholar
Kenty, J. (2020) Cicero’s Political Personae. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) “The Literary Heritage as Language: Atticism and the Second Sophistic,” in Bakker, E. J. (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 468–82.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2017) “Atticism and Asianism,” in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford University Press. 41–66.Google Scholar
Kinsey, T. E. (ed.) (1971) Pro P. Quinctio oratio, Edited with Text, Introduction, and Commentary. Sidney University Press.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. (2013) The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, R. (2010) “Augustan Aphrodites: The Allure of Greek Art in Roman Visual Culture,” in Smith, A. C. and Pickup, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Aphrodite. Leiden: Brill. 285–306.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (ed.) (1999) The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (2005) “Hair, Hegemony, and Historiography: Caesar’s Style and Its Earliest Critics,” in Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M., and Adams, J. H. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. Oxford: British Academy. 97–115.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (2009) “Bellum Gallicum,” in Griffin, (ed.), 157–74.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. B. (2018) “A Style of Choice,” in Grillo, and Krebs, (eds.), 110–30.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2009) Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro and Virgil. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2001) Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2005) “Style and Ideology in the Pro Marcello,” in Welch, K. E., Hillard, T. W., and Bellemore, J. (eds.), Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 279–312.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1962) Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des römischen Kriminalverfahrens in vorsullanischer Zeit. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kurczyk, S. (2006) Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit: autobiographisches Schreiben in der späten Römischen Republik. Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Kytzler, B. (1970) Cicero: Brutus. Munich: Heimeran.Google Scholar
La Bua, G. (2019) Cicero and Roman Education: The Reception of the Speeches and Ancient Scholarship. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, A. (ed.) (2006) Oxford Readings in Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2018) Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laurence, R. and Smith, C. J. (1995) “Ritual, Time and Power in Ancient Rome,” Accordia Research Papers 6: 133–51.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lebek, W. D. (1970) Verba prisca: die Anfänge des Archaisierens in der lateinischen Beredsamkeit und Geschichtsschreibung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Lehmann, A. (2002) Varron critique littéraire: regard sur les poètes latins archaïques. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Lehmann, A. (2004) “Les débuts de la critique littéraire à Rome,” in De Poli, L. and Lehmann, Y. (eds.), Naissance de la science dans l’Italie antique et moderne. Berne: Lang. 139–62.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2012) What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. (2009) “Historians without History: Against Roman Historiography,” in Feldherr, (ed.), 41–61.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1901) Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer literarischen Form. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1912) Plautinische Forschungen: zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie, 2nd ed. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1913) Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Erster Band. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1960) Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, vol. ii. Rome: Edizione di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (2004) “Tacitus’ Dialogus as Literary History,” TAPhA 134: 157–200.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. (1957) Pyrrhos. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1986) “The Augural Law,” ANRWII 16/3: 2146–312.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1974) “Cicero and Milo,” JRS 64: 62–78.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1992) Judicial Reform and Land Reform in the Roman Republic: A New Edition, with Translation and Commentary, of the Laws from Urbino. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (2004) “Legal Procedure in Cicero’s Time,” in Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J. (eds.), Cicero the Advocate. Oxford University Press. 61–78.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (2008) Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995) “Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle,” in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. Oxford University Press. 37–61.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2008) “Cicero on Caesar or Exemplum and Inability in the Brutus,” in Arweiler, A. H. and Möller, M. (eds.), Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit / Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin: de Gruyter. 131–54.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1989) “Ancient Views on the Causes of Bias in Historical Writing,” CPh 84: 16–31.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. (2013) “Cicero in Late Antiquity,” in Steel, C. (ed.), 251–305.Google Scholar
MacKendrick, P. (1989) The Philosophical Books of Cicero. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. (2016) Legible Religion: Books, Gods, and Rituals in Roman Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. (2018) “Diligentissumus investigator antiquitatis? ‘Antiquarianism’ and Historical Evidence between Republican Rome and the Early Modern Republic of Letters,” in Sandberg, K. and Smith, C. (eds.), Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome. Leiden: Brill. 137–56.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1991) A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Mankin, D. (2011) Cicero: De Oratore Book III. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2011) Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marinone, N. (2004) Cronologia Ciceroniana, Secunda Edizione aggiornata e corretta con nuova versione interattiva in CD-rom, ed. Malaspina, E.. Bologna: Centro di Studi Ciceroniani Pàtron.Google Scholar
Marmorale, E. V. (1967) Naevius Poeta: introduzione biobibliografica, testo dei frammenti e commento, 2nd ed. Florence: La nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Marr, J. (1995) “The Death of Themistocles,” G&R 42: 159–67.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.-I. (1971) Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité, 6th ed. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. J. (1984) “Symbols and Showmanship in Roman Public Life: The Fasces,” Phoenix 38: 120–41.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. M. (1993) “Atticus and the Genealogies,” Latomus 52: 307–17.Google Scholar
Marshall, R. M. A. (2017) “Varro, Atticus, and Annales,” BICS 60/2: 61–75.Google Scholar
Martha, J. (1960) Cicéron: Brutus. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Martin, P. M. (2014) “Entre prosopographie et politique: la figure et l’ascendance de Brutus dans le Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.), 215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. M. (1988) Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (1990) “The Monologistic Dialogue as a Method of Literary Criticism: Cicero, Brutus 285–289 and Horace, Epistle 2.1.34–39,” Athenaeum 68: 177–80.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (ed.) (2002) Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzarino, S. (1966) Il pensiero storico classico, vol. ii, part 2. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. (1972) “Curio Pater and Cicero,” AJPh 93: 381–411.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2012) Plagiarism in Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1998) The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. N. (1979) Cicero: The Ascending Years. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. N. (1991) Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moatti, C. (1997) La raison de Rome: naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2003) “Experts, mémoire et pouvoir à Rome, à la fin de la République,” RH 626: 303–25.Google Scholar
Möller, M. (2004) Talis oratio – qualis vita: zu Theorie und Praxis mimetischer Verfahren in der griechisch-römischen Literaturkritik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. D. (1950) “Ancient History and the Antiquarian.” JWI 13: 285–315.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. D. (1990) The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2015) “Hellenistic Scholarship,” in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship. Leiden: Brill. 60–183.Google Scholar
Monteleone, C. (2003) La “Terza Filippica” di Cicerone: retorica e regolamento del Senato, legalità e rapporti di forza. Fasano: Schena.Google Scholar
Moreau, P. (1982) Clodiana religio: un procès politique en 61 av. J.-C. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (1995) Acutum dicendi genus: brevità, oscurità, sottigliezze e paradossi nelle tradizioni retoriche degli Stoici. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. A. (1994) “Socrates and Gorgias at Delphi and Olympia: Phaedrus 235d6–236b4,” CQ 44: 375–86.Google Scholar
Morrell, K. (2017) Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrell, K. (2018) “Cato, Pompey’s Third Consulship and the Politics of Milo’s Trial,” in van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge University Press. 165–80.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. (1989) “Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature,” Michigan Quarterly Review 28: 1–34.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2008) “What Was Literary History?” in Berthold, J. and Previšić, B. (eds.), Texttreue: komparatistische Studien zu einem masslosen Massstab. Bern: Lang. 195–207.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2001) Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2013) “From Meeting to Text: The Contio in the Late Republic,” in Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford University Press. 63–82.Google Scholar
Münzer, F. (1905) “Atticus als Geschichtschreiber,” Hermes 40: 50–100.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (1997) Cicerone e l’eloquenza romana: retorica e progetto culturale. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2002) “Brutus: The History of Roman Eloquence,” in May, (ed.), 401–25.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1972) “Les lois judiciaires et les tribunaux de concussion,” ANRW 1/2: 197–214.Google Scholar
Noël, M.-P. (2003) “La Συναγωγὴ τεχνῶν d’Aristote et la polémique sur les débuts de la rhétorique chez Cicéron,” in Lévy, C., Besnier, B., and Gigandet, A. (eds.), Ars et ratio: sciences, art et métiers dans la philosophie hellénistique et romaine: actes du colloque international organisé à Créteil, Fontenay et Paris du 16 au 18 octobre 1997. Paris: Latomus. 113–25.Google Scholar
Noël, M.-P. (2014) “Périclès et les débuts de la rhétorique grecque dans le Brutus,” in Aubert-Baillot, and Guérin, (eds.), 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norden, E. (1898) Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
North, J. (1990) “Democratic Politics in Republican Rome,” P&P 126: 3–21.Google Scholar
Nousek, D. L. (2018) “Genres and Generic Contaminations: The Commentarii,” in Grillo, and Krebs, (eds.), 97–109.Google Scholar
Novara, A. (1982) Les idées romaines sur le progrès d’après les écrivains de la République. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2015) “Poetics and Literary Criticism in the Framework of Ancient Greek Scholarship,” in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship. Leiden: Brill. 706–55.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. W. (2005) “Cicero’s Pro Caelio 33–34 and Appius Claudius’ Oratio de Pyrrho,” CPh 100: 355–58.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1997) “Caecilius, the ‘Canons’ of Writers, and the Origins of Atticism,” in Dominik, W. J. (ed.), Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. London: Routledge. 32–49.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (2015) “‘Rhetorical’ vs ‘Linguistic’ Atticism: A False Dichotomy?” Rhetorica 33: 134–46.Google Scholar
Otto, A. (1890) Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Paul, H. (2011) Hayden White: The Historical Imagination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2013) “Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: Intertextuality and Literary Deviancy between Law, Rhetoric, and Literature in Roman Imperial Culture,” AJPh 134: 83–100.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2006) “Judging Julius Caesar,” in Wyke, M. (ed.), Julius Caesar in Western Culture. Oxford: Wiley. 1–26.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. (1991) “Introduction,” in Perkins, D. (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Literary History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1–8.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. (1992) Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Perlwitz, O. (1992) Titus Pomponius Atticus. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. (2018) “Caesar the Linguist: The Debate about the Latin Language,” in Grillo, and Krebs, (eds.), 173–92.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (1996) Contra arma uerbis: der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2003) “Minerva: Custos Urbis de Roma y de Tarraco,” AEA 76: 111–19.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2011) The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2012) “Contio, Auctoritas and Freedom of Speech in Republican Rome,” in Benoist, S. (ed.), Rome, a City and Its Empire in Perspective: The Impact of the Roman World through Fergus Millar’s Research. Leiden: Brill. 45–58.Google Scholar
Piras, G. (2012) “Tradizione indiretta e testi frammentari: Ennio, Ann. 303–308 V.2 (304–308 Sk.), Cicerone e Gellio,” in Gamberale, L., De Nonno, M., Di Giovine, C., and Passalacqua, M. (eds.), Le strade della filologia: per Scevola Mariotti. Rome: Edizione di Storia e Letteratura. 41–69.Google Scholar
Piras, G. (2017) “La prosopopea di Appio Claudio Cieco (Cic. Cael. 33–34): tradizione letteraria, memoria familiare e polemica politica,” in De Paolis, P. (ed.), Cicerone oratore: atti dell’VIII Simposio Ciceroniano, Arpino 6 maggio 2016. Cassino: Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale. 63–100.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1974) The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1990) The Art of Ancient Greece: Sources and Documents. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (1998) “Julius Caesar and the Presentation of Massacre,” in Welch, K. E. and Powell, A. (eds.), Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments. London: Duckworth. 111–37.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1988) Cicero: Cato Maior de senectute. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2010a) “Court Procedure and Rhetorical Strategy in Cicero,” in Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (eds.), Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge University Press. 21–36.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2010b) “Hyperbaton and Register in Cicero,” in Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds.), Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge University Press. 163–85.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2009) “Bellum Gallicum,” in Griffin, (ed.), 175–91.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2018) “Caesar, Literature, and Politics at the End of the Republic,” in Grillo, and Krebs, (eds.), 13–28.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1979) “César et la rhétorique: a propos de Cicéron (Brutus, 261–262),” in La rhétorique à Rome: colloque des 10–11 décembre 1977, Paris. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. 19–39.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2016) “How and Why Was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 BC?” Historia 65: 298–324.Google Scholar
Rathofer, C. (1986) Ciceros Brutus als literarisches Paradigma eines Auctoritas-Verhältnisses. Frankfurt am Main: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1972) “Cicero the Historian and Cicero the Antiquarian,” JRS 62: 33–45.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1979) “L. Cornelius Sisenna and the Early First Century B.C.,” CQ 29: 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. (1982) “Crassorum Funera,” Latomus 41: 540–49.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1983) Cicero: A Portrait, 2nd ed. Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1986) “Cassius and Brutus: The Memory of the Liberators,” in Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge University Press. 101–19.Google Scholar
Richards, E. G. (1998) Mapping Time: The Calendar and Its History. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. (2011) “Old Boys: Teacher-Student Bonding in Roman Oratory,” CW 105: 91–107.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2006) Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2010) Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. A. (1951) “The Date of Cicero’s Brutus,” HSPh 60: 137–46.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2018) Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rollinger, C. (2017) “Ciceros supplicatio und aristokratische Konkurrenz im Senat der späten Republik,” Klio 99: 192–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998) Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rösch-Binde, C. (1998) Vom “δεινὸς ἄνερ” zum “diligentissimus investigator antiquitatis”: zur komplexen Beziehung zwischen M. Tullius Cicero und M. Terentius Varro. Munich: Utz.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (2007) “Military Command, Political Power, and the Republican Elite,” in Erdkamp, P. (ed.), A Companion to the Roman Army. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 132–47.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. (ed.) (2017) Political Communication in the Roman World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2011) The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History, and the Fasti. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012) Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1979) “De Imitatione,” in West, D. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press. 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981) Criticism in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B. (1991) Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. (1998) Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Saintsbury, G. (1900) A History of Criticism and Literary Taste in Europe: From the Earliest Texts to the Present Day, vol. i. Edinburgh: Blackwood.Google Scholar
Salerno, F. (1999) Tacita libertas: l’introduzione del voto segreto nella Roma repubblicana. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Schaaf, L. (1979) “Die Todesjahre des Naevius und des Plautus in der antiken Überlieferung,” RhM 122: 24–33.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1988) “Iudicia vulgi: Cicero, De oratore 3.195ff. and Brutus 183ff,” Rhetorica 6: 291–305.Google Scholar
Schilling, R. (1982) La religion romaine de Vénus depuis les origines jusqu’au temps d’Auguste, 2nd ed. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2007) “Ἀναλογία, Analogia, Proportio, Ratio: Loanwords, Calques and Reinterpretations of a Greek Technical Word,” in Basset, L., Biville, F., Colombat, B., Swiggers, P., and Wouters, A. (eds.), Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine. Leuven; Paris; Dudley, MA: Peeters. 321–38.Google Scholar
Schlicher, J. J. (1936) “The Development of Caesar’s Narrative Style,” CPh 31: 212–24.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) “Ciceronian Dialogue,” in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press. 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (ed.) (2013) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New Directions for Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, P., Walter, U., and Winkle, C. (2013) Fragmente römischer Memoiren. Heidelberg: Antike.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. (1969) Antike Vorstellungen von der Geschichte der griechischen Rhetorik. Diss. Saarland University.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. (1994) “Das Nachleben der Technon synagoge bei Cicero, Quintilian und in den griechischen Prolegomena zur Rhetorik,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Mirhady, D. C. (eds.), Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. 192–216.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1988) “Platonic Elements in the Structure of Cicero De oratore Book I,” Rhetorica 6: 237–58.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. (2000) Prolegomena zu einer “Phänomenologie” der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2015) “Schools, Teachers, and Patrons in Mid-Republican Rome,” in Bloomer, W. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Education. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 226–39.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. (2013) “Towards a Genre of Consolation,” in Baltussen, H. (ed.), Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 1–36.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997) “The Ethics of Brutus and Cassius,” JRS 87: 41–53.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (ed.) (2012) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sehlmeyer, M. (2003) “Die Anfänge der antiquarischen Literatur in Rom: Motivation und Bezug zur Historiographie bis in die Zeit von Tuditanus und Gracchanus,” in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds.), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen, Autoren, Kontexte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 157–71.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1971) Cicero. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1909) “Φύσις, Μϵλέτη, Ἐπιστήμη,” TAPhA 40: 185–201.Google Scholar
Shorn, S. (2004) Satyros aus Kallatis: Sammlung der Fragmente mit Kommentar. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. (2009) “Sulla’s Memoirs,” in Smith, C. J and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 65–86.Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. (2018) “Varro and the Contours of Roman Antiquarianism,” Latomus 77: 1090–1118.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015) “Aesthetics and Latin Literary Reception,” in Friedland, E. A., Sobocinski, M. G., and Gazda, E. K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture. Oxford University Press. 589–605.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2002) “Cicero’s Brutus: The End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?” BICS 46: 195–211.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2005) Reading Cicero. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2012) “Cicero’s Autobiography: Narratives of Success in the Pre-Consular Orations,” CCG 23: 251–66.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2013a) “Structure, Meaning and Authority in Cicero’s Dialogues,” in Föllinger, and Müller, (eds.), 221–34.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (ed.) (2013b) The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2016) “Early-career Prosecutors: Forensic Activity and Senatorial Careers in the Late Republic,” in Du Plessis, P. (ed.), Cicero’s Law: Rethinking Roman Law of the Late Republic. Edinburgh University Press. 205–27.Google Scholar
Steel, D. (2000) Marking Time: The Epic Quest to Invent the Perfect Calendar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stem, S. R. (2005) “The First Eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger,” CJ 101: 37–49.Google Scholar
Stern, S. (2012) Calendars in Antiquity: Empires, States, and Societies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, S. (2017) “Calendars, Politics, and Power Relations in the Roman Empire,” in Ben-Dov, J. and Doering, L. (eds.), The Construction of Time in Antiquity: Ritual, Art, and Identity. Cambridge University Press. 31–49.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F. (1990) Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F. (1997) Art, Desire and the Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F. (2010) “A Tale of Seven Nudes: The Capitoline and Medici Aphrodites, Four Nymphs at Elean Kerakleia, and an Aphrodite at Megalopolis,” Antichthon 44: 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, D. L. (1971) Cicero: A Political Biography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1990) Ciceros philosophisches Spätwerk als Aufruf gegen die Herrschaft Caesars, ed. Strasburger, G.. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. (2003) “Adulta Virgo: The Personification of Textual Eloquence in Cicero’s Brutus,” MD 50: 115–40.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. (2010) Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stull, W. (2011) “Deus ille noster: Platonic Precedent and the Construction of the Interlocutors in Cicero’s De oratore,” TAPhA 141: 247–63.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1995) “Rhetorik gegen Pyrrhos: zum Widerstand gegen den Feind aus dem Osten in der Rede des Appius Claudius Caecus 280/279 v. Chr. nach Ennius, Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta und B. G. Niebuhr,” in Schubert, C. and Brodersen, K. (eds.), Rom und der griechische Osten. Stuttgart: Steiner. 251–65.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1996/1997) “Vorliterarische römische Redner (bis zum Beginn des 2. Jhs. v. Chr.) in Ciceros Brutus und in der historischen Überlieferung,” WJA 21: 169–98.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1997) “Fehlende Redner in Ciceros Brutus? Nebst Hinweisen auf fehlende Entwicklung, fehlende Belege und fehlende Ernsthaftigkeit in einer Geschichte der römischen Beredsamkeit,” in Czapla, B., Lehmann, T., and Liell, S. (eds.), Vir bonus dicendi peritus: Festschrift für Alfons Weisch. Wiesbaden: Reichert. 407–19.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (ed.) (2002) Die archaische Literatur: von den Anfängen bis Sullas Tod: die vorliterarische Periode und die Zeit von 240 bis 78 v. Chr. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. (1973) The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1980) “The Sons of Crassus,” Latomus 39: 403–8.Google Scholar
Tan, J. (2008) “Contiones in the Age of Cicero,” CA 27: 163–201.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (1989) Xenophon’s Imperial Fiction: On the Education of Cyrus. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1991) “Cicero, the Elder Curio and the Titinia Case,” Mnemosyne 44: 364–71.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2011) “The Late Republic: Autobiographies and Memoirs in the Age of the Civil Wars,” in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill. 161–87.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1949) Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1966) Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2011) Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2013) “An Ethos of Sincerity: Echoes of the De Republica in Cicero’s Pro Marcello,” G&R 60: 262–80.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2017) Brutus: The Noble Conspirator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (tr.) (2000) Lysias. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (2015) “The Education of the Ciceros,” in Bloomer, W. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Education. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 240–51.Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. S. (2008) “The Pulvinar in Roman Culture,” TAPhA 138: 239–73.Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. S. (2014) The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus: Aesthetics and Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. S. (2019) “The Invention of Literary History in Cicero’s Brutus,” CPh 114: 573–603.Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. S. (2021) “Phaedrus in the Forum: Plautus’ Pseudolus and Plato’s Phaedrus,” in Marshall, C. W. (ed.), Festschrift for Susanna Morton Braund. London; New York: Routledge. 91–106.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hook, L. (1905) The Metaphorical Terminology of Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism. Diss. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Vardi, A. (2003) “Canons of Literary Texts at Rome,” in Finkelberg, M. and Stroumsa, G. G. (eds.), Homer, the Bible, and Beyond: Literary and Religious Canons in the Ancient World. Leiden: Brill. 131–52.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1987) “Personality and Power: Livy’s Depiction of the Appii Claudii in the First Pentad,” TAPhA 117: 203–26.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1993) Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2020) “Varro and the Disorder of Things,” HSPh 110: 184–212.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2021) The Roman Republic of Letters: Scholarship, Philosophy, and Politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Volk, K. and Zetzel, J. E. G. (2015) “Laurel, Tongue and Glory (Cicero, De Consulatu Suo Fr. 6 Soubiran),” CQ 65: 204–23.Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. (1989) Masters of Roman Prose from Cato to Apuleius, tr. Adkin, N.. Leeds: Cairns.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997) “Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge University Press. 3–22.Google Scholar
Walter, U. (2010) “‘Caesar macht Geschichte’: Memorialpolitik und Historiographie zwischen Konvention und Innovation,” in Urso, G. (ed.), Cesare: precursore o visionario? Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 17–19 settembre 2009. Pisa: ETS. 59–73.Google Scholar
Walters, B. (2020) The Deaths of the Republic: Imagery of the Body Politic in Ciceronian Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. (2014) Suetonius: Life of Augustus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wassmann, H. (1996) Ciceros Widerstand gegen Caesars Tyrannis: Untersuchungen zur politischen Bedeutung der philosophischen Spätschriften. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. (1971) Divus Julius. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Welch, K. E. (1996) “T. Pomponius Atticus: A Banker in Politics?” Historia 45: 450–71.Google Scholar
Wellek, R. (1963) Concepts of Criticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wellek, R. and Warren, A. (1956) Theory of Literature, 3rd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2011) “Accius, Porcius Licinus, and the Beginning of Latin Literature,” JRS 101: 31–50.Google Scholar
White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. L. (2013) Pliny the Younger: Epistles, Book II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz, U. von (1900) “Asianismus und Atticismus,” Hermes 35: 1–52.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. J. (1987) The Measure of Times Past: Pre-Newtonian Chronologies and the Rhetoric of Relative Time. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M. F. (1985) “Caesar’s Bibracte Narrative and the Aims of Caesarian Style,” ICS 10: 215–26.Google Scholar
Winsbury, R. (2009) The Roman Book: Books, Publishing and Performance in Classical Rome. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1982) “Literary Criticism,” in Kenney, E. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press. 33–50.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1954) “Cicero’s cum dignitate otium: A Reconsideration.” JRS 44: 1–13.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1971) New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1974) “Legendary Genealogies in Late-Republican Rome,” G&R 21: 153–64.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1979) Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2009) Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (1989) Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (1995) “Greeks, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism,” in Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R., and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. Amsterdam: VU University Press. 65–82.Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. (1979) Cicero Imperator: Studies in Cicero’s Correspondence, 51–47 B.C. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2015) Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1983) Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model: The Rhetoric of Crisis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1997) “Cicero and Quintilian on the Style of Demosthenes,” Rhetorica 15: 177–92.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (1992) “Petitio et Largitio: Popular Participation in the Centuriate Assembly of the Late Republic,” JRS 82: 32–52.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (1995) “Secret Ballot and Its Effects in the Late Roman Republic,” Hermes 123: 426–42.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (1999) Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (2009) “The Irritating Statues and Contradictory Portraits of Julius Caesar,” in Griffin, (ed.), 288–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (2003) Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1972) “Cicero and the Scipionic Circle,” HSPh 76: 173–79.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1981) Latin Textual Criticism in Antiquity. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1995) De re publica: Selections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2003) “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture,” in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. University of Exeter Press. 119–38.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2007) “The Influence of Cicero on Ennius,” in Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds.), “Ennius perennis”: The “Annals” and Beyond. Cambridge Philological Society. 1–16.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2009) Cicero: Ten Speeches. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2013) “Political Philosophy,” in Steel, (ed.), 181–95.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2017) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018) Critics, Compilers, and Commentators: An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. (1962) Cicero Platonis aemulus: Untersuchung über die Form von Ciceros Dialogen, besonders von De oratore. Zurich: Juris-Verlag.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Christopher S. van den Berg, Amherst College, Massachusetts
  • Book: The Politics and Poetics of Cicero's <I>Brutus</I>
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281386.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Christopher S. van den Berg, Amherst College, Massachusetts
  • Book: The Politics and Poetics of Cicero's <I>Brutus</I>
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281386.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Christopher S. van den Berg, Amherst College, Massachusetts
  • Book: The Politics and Poetics of Cicero's <I>Brutus</I>
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281386.012
Available formats
×