Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:18:58.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Alessandro Roncaglia
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Power and Inequality
A Reformist Perspective
, pp. 285 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbate, L. (2017). La lista. Il ricatto alla Repubblica di Massimo Carminati, Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Agarwal, B. (2016). Gender challenges, 3 vols., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Almerighi, M. (2006). Petrolio e potere, Roma: Editori Riuniti; II ed., Roma: Castelvecchi, 2014.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism, London and New York: Verso; new ed., 1991; Italian transl., Comunità immaginate, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2018.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (1549). A discourse of the common weal of this realm of England, new ed. by., E. Lamond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1893.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1948). The origins of totalitarianism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Aristotle [c. 350 BC]. (1977). Politics, Loeb Classic Library, vol. 21, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arlacchi, P. (1983). La mafia imprenditrice, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Asimov, I. (1957). The naked sun, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. (1832). On the economy of machinery and manufactures, London: Charles Knight; repr. of the IV ed., (1835), New York: M. Kelley, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P., Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (1994). Regioni, tradizione civica, modernizzazione italiana: un commento alla ricerca di Putnam. Stato e Mercato, 1, 93103.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (1996). L’Italia in tempi di cambiamento politico, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (2013). Economie e società nello spazio: uno sguardo in Italia. In Antropocene: modifiche naturali ed entropiche del fragile equilibrio della terra, Atti dei convegni lincei, n. 278, Roma: Bardi, pp. 187–94.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (2016). La questione del ceto medio, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. (2020). Relazione introduttiva. In Diseguaglianze e classi sociali. La ricerca in Italia e nelle democrazie avanzate, Atti dei convegni lincei, n. 337, Roma: Bardi, pp. 726.Google Scholar
Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society, Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked. The new science of networks, New York: Perseus.Google Scholar
Baranelli, L., Ciafaloni, F. (2013). Una stanza all’Einaudi, Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2003). Intervista sull’identità, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1959). Business behaviour, value and growth, New York: Harcourt & C.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure, San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1764). Dei delitti e delle pene, Livorno; repr. in F. Venturi, ed., Illuministi italiani. Tomo III. Riformatori lombardi piemontesi e toscani, Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi, 1958, pp. 27–105.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; Italian transl., La società del rischio, Roma: Carocci, 2000.Google Scholar
Bekkouche, Y., Cagé, J. (2018). The price of a vote: evidence from France, 1993–2014, Working Paper no. 68, INET (available at www.ineteconomics.org/workingpapers).Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1987). The world and the United States in 2013. Daedalus, 116(3), 131.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1791). Panopticon or the inspection house, London: T. Payne; Italian transl., Panopticon ovvero la casa d’ispezione, Foucault M., M. Pierrot eds., Venezia: Marsilio, 1983.Google Scholar
Berik, G., Kongar, E., eds. (2021). The Routledge handbook of feminist economics, Abington and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A., Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property, New York: The Commerce Clearing House.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1958). Two concepts of liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (2002). Liberty, ed. by H. Hardy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, E. (1899). Die Vorraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie, Stuttgard: Dietz; English transl., Evolutionary Socialism, New York: Huebsch, 1909; repr. New York: Schocken, 1961.Google Scholar
Blair, J. M. (1976). The control of oil, New York: Pantheon Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1976). Quale socialismo?, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1984). Dibattito sulla democrazia italiana. Il potere in maschera. La Stampa, 21 agosto.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1990). L’età dei diritti, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1994). Destra e sinistra. Ragioni e significati di una distinzione politica, Roma: Donzelli; IV ed., 2004.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (2010). Elementi di politica. Antologia, Polito, P. ed., Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (2011). Democrazia e segreto, Rovelli, M. ed., Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N., Viroli, M. (2001). Dialogo intorno alla repubblica, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Bocca, S., ed. (1960). Le baronie elettriche, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. The degradation of work in the Twentieth century, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Breglia, A. (1965). Reddito sociale, Sylos Labini, P. ed., Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Caffè, F. (1972). La strategia dell’allarmismo economico. Giornale degli economisti, 31(9–10), 692–99; repr. in Amari G. and N. Rocchi eds., Un economista per gli uomini comuni, Roma: Ediesse, 2007, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
Cahuc, P., Zylberberg, A. (2016). Le négationnisme économique. Et comment s’en débarasser, Paris: Flammarion; Italian transl., Contro il negazionismo, Milano: Università Bocconi Editore, 2018.Google Scholar
Cairncross, J. (1974). Aftyer poligamy was made a sin. The social history of Christian polygamy, London: Routedge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Calogero, G. (1940). Manifesto del liberalsocialismo, repr. in Difesa del liberalsocialismo e altri saggi, Milano: Marzorati, 1972.Google Scholar
Calogero, G. (1942). L’ircocervo ovvero le due libertà; repr. in Difesa del liberalsocialismo e altri saggi, Milano: Marzorati, 1972, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Campanella, T. [1602] (1964). La città del sole, Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Canetti, E. (1960). Masse und Macht, Hambourg: Claassen Verlag; Italian transl., Masse e potere, Milano: Adelphi, 1981; repr., 2015.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. (2004). La democrazia. Storia di un’ideologia, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général, London: Fletcher Gyles; repr. with English transl. Higgs H. ed., London: Macmillan, 1931; repr., New York: M. Kelley, 1964.Google Scholar
Carabelli, A., Parisi, D., Rosselli, A. (1999). Che’genere’ di economista?, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2001). Internet galaxy, Oxford: Oxford University Press; Italian transl., Galassia internet, Milano: Feltrinelli, 2002.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope. The dynamics of industrial capitalism, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chafuen, A. A. (1986). Christians for freedom. Late-Scholastic economics, San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Ciotti, F., Roncaglia, G. (2000). Il mondo digitale, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. (1940). Toward a concept of workable competition. American Economic Review, 30, 241–56.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm, Economica, 4; repr. in Coase R. H., The firm, the market and the law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
Colarizi, S. (2007). Storia politica della Repubblica, 1943–2006, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Colletti, L. (1969). Ideologia e società, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Colletti, L. (1974). Marxismo e dialettica, appendix to Intervista storico-filosofica, Roma-Bari: Laterza, pp. 63–113.Google Scholar
Collier, P. (2013). Exodus. How migration is changing our world, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Commissione parlamentare d’inchiesta sul caso Sindona (2005). Dossier Sindona, Milano: Kaos edizioni.Google Scholar
Consiglio superiore della magistratura (2015). Il sistema giudiziario italiano. Normativa in materia di ordinamento giudiziario e di organizzazione e funzionamento del C.S.M., Roma.Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1819). De la liberté des anciens comparée à celle des modernes; Italian transl., La libertà degli antichi, paragonata a quella dei moderni, Torino: Einaudi, 2001.Google Scholar
Corsi, M. (1984). Il sistema di fabbrica e la divisione del lavoro: il pensiero di Charles Babbage. Quaderni di storia dell’economia politica, 3, 111–23.Google Scholar
Corsi, M., ed. (1995). Le diseguaglianze economiche, Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., Lucidi, F. (2011). On the evaluation of economic research: the case of Italy. Economia politica, 3, 369402.Google Scholar
Crainz, G. (2012). Il paese reale, Roma: Donzelli; II ed., 2013.Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1942). Scopritori di contraddizioni. La critica, 20 gennaio.Google Scholar
Croce, B., Einaudi, L. (1957). Liberismo e liberalismo, Solari, P. ed., Milano-Napoli: Riccardo Ricciardi editore.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2003). Postdemocrazia, Roma-Bari: Roma-Bari: Laterza; English transl., Post-Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2013). Making capitalism fit for society, Cambridge: Polity Press; Italian transl, Quanto capitalismo può sopportare la società, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2014.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral science, 2, 201–15.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; Italian transl., Classi e conflitto di classe nella società industriale, Bari: Laterza, 1963; V ed., 1977.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1995). Quadrare il cerchio, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Darvas, J., Steinmetz, K., Flowers, R. H., Gouni, L., Grieger, G., Köberlein, K., Pease, R. S., Roncaglia, A. (1991). Environmental, safety related and economic potential of fusion power. Plasma physics and controlled nuclear fusion research, vol. 3, IAEA, Wien, pp. 633–45.Google Scholar
David, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75, 332–7.Google Scholar
D’Eramo, M. (2020). Dominio, Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
De Felice, R. (1969). Le interpretazioni del fascismo, Bari: Laterza; IX ed., 2007.Google Scholar
De Felice, R. (1975). Intervista sul fascismo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
De Mauro, T. (2010). La cultura degli italiani, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Dickie, J. (2011). Blood Brotherhoods. The rise of the Italian mafias, London: Sceptre; Italian transl. Onorate società, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C. (2011). Economics and diversity, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C. (2020). Democratizing the economics debate. Pluralism and research evaluation, Abington: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C., Malaguti, M. C., Roncaglia, A. (2020). L’Unione Europea e l’euro: crescere o perire. Moneta e Credito, 73, 183205.Google Scholar
D’Ippoliti, C., Roncaglia, A. (2011). L’Italia: una crisi nella crisi. Moneta e Credito, 64(255), 189227.Google Scholar
Dobb, M., Sweezy, P., Takahashi, K., Hulton, R., Hill, C. (1954). The transition from feudalism to capitalism. A symposium, New York: Science and Society.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1980). Il nome della rosa, Milano: Bompiani; repr., Barcellona: Bibliotex, 2002.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B., Ehrenreich, J. (1977). The professional-managerial class. Radical America, 11(2), 740 and 11(3), 7–24.Google Scholar
Eichner, A. S. (1976). The megacorp and oligopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einaudi, L. (1949). Lezioni di politica sociale, Torino: Einaudi; repr., Milano: Vitale & Associati, 2002.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1939). Über den prozess der Zivilisation, 2 vols., Basel: Hans zum Falken; Italian transl., Il processo di civilizzazione, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1988.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1982). Sour grapes. Utilitarianism and the genesis of wants. In Sen, A., Williams, B., pp. 219–38; Italian transl., L’uva acerba. L’utilitarismo e la genesi dei voleri. In ibid., pp. 271–95.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post-industrial economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission Staff Report (1952). The international petroleum cartel, Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1767). An essay on the history of civil society, Edinburgh: A. Kinkaid & J. Bell.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1995). Golden Rule, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T., Jorgensen, P., Chen, J. (2019). How money drives US congressional elections:linearmodels of money and outcomes. Preprint, Structural change and economic dynamics.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge, London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Fitoussi, J.-P., Sen, A., Stiglitz, J. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris (www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm).Google Scholar
Foley, S., Karlsen, J. R., Putniņš, T. (2019). Sex, drugs and bitcoins: how much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies?. Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 17981853.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France 1978–1979, Paris: Seuil-Gallimard; Italian transl., Nascita della biopolitica, Milano: Feltrinelli, 2005; UE Feltrinelli, III ed., 2017.Google Scholar
Franzinelli, M. (2007). Il delitto Rosselli, Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Franzinelli, M. (2010). Il piano Solo, Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Fuà, G. (1993). Crescita economica. Le insidie delle cifre, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man, New York: Free Press; Italian transl., La fine della Storia e l’ultimo uomo, Milano: Rizzoli, 1992.Google Scholar
Furtado, C. (1964). Development and underdevelopment, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1952). American capitalism, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The affluent society, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state, Boston: Houghton Mifflin; repr. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar
Galbraith, James K. (2008). The predator state, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Galiani, F. (1751). Della moneta, Napoli: Giuseppe Raimondi; II ed., Napoli: Stamperia simoniana, 1780; repr., Milano: Feltrinelli, 1963.Google Scholar
Gauchet, M. (2020). Destra/sinistra. Storia di una dicotomia, new ed., Napoli: Diana edizioni.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press; II ed., 2006; repr. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1988). The interplay between institutional and material factors: the problem and its status, in Kregel, J. A., Matzner, E., Roncaglia, A., eds., Barriers to full employment, Houndmills-London: Macmillan, pp. 297326.Google Scholar
Germani, G. (1971). Sociologia della modernizzazione, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998). The third way, Cambridge: Polity Press; Italian transl., La terza via. Manifesto per la rifondazione della socialdemocrazia, Milano: Il Saggiatore, 1999.Google Scholar
Giugni, G. (2007). La memoria di un riformista, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Glattfelder, J. B. (2013). Decoding complexity, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. (1992). Revised class schema, London: Social and community planning research.Google Scholar
Graeber, D., Weingrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything. A new history of humanity, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1975). Quaderni del carcere, Gerratana, V. ed., Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Sharfstein, D. (2013). The growth of finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 328.Google Scholar
Guidetti Serra, B. (1984). Le schedature Fiat, Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. (1982). What’s the use of going to school? In Sen and Williams, 1982, pp. 261–78; Italian transl., A cosa serve andare a scuola? Il problema dell’educazione nell’utilitarismo e nella teoria dei diritti. In ibid., pp. 325–44.Google Scholar
Hall, P., Soskice, D., eds. (2001). Varieties of capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, B.-C. (2005). Was ist Macht?, Stuttgard: Phillip Reclam; English transl., What is power?, Cambridge: Polity press, 2019.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. (1962). Measurement of social power, opportunity costs and the theory of two-person bargaining games. Behavioral Science, 7, 6780; partial repr. in Rothschild K., 1971, pp. 77–96.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von (1944). The road to serfdom, Chicago: Chicago University Press; repr. (with introduction by M. Friedman), 1994.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, vol. 1, Rules and order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von (1999). Good money. Part II. The standard, Kresge, S. ed., The collected works of F.A. Hayek, vol. 6, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J., Landersø, R. (2021). Lessons from Denmark about inequality and social mobility, Working Paper n. 28543, Cambridge (Mass.): National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Heckman, J., Moktan, S. (2018). Publishing and promotion in economics: the tyranny of the Top Five, Working Paper, INET (available at www.ineteconomics.org/workingpapers).Google Scholar
Heimans, J., Timms, H. (2018). New power; Italian transl., L’arte del potere nel XXI secolo, Torino: Einaudi, 2020.Google Scholar
Herodotus, [c. 430 BC] (2015). Historiae, Wilson, N. G. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilferding, R. (1910,). Das Finanzkapital, Wien: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung Ignaz Brand.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade, Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press; repr. 1969; new ed., 1980.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The passions and the interests, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Rival interpretations of market society: civilizing, destructive, or feeble?. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 1463–84.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press; Italian transl., Retoriche dell’intransigenza, Bologna: il Mulino, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, London: Andrew Crooke; trad. it., Leviatano, Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1974.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752). Political discourses, Edinburgh: A. Kincaid and A. Donaldson; rist. in Essays: moral, political, and literary, Miller E. F. ed., Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (2004). Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Innis, H. A. (1950). Empire and communications, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irti, N. (1998). L’ordine giuridico del mercato, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Israel, J. I. (2006). Enlightenment contested, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., Soskice, D. (2019). Democracy and prosperity: reinventing capitalism through a turbulent century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Izzo, L., Pedone, A., Spaventa, L., Volpi, F. (1969). Rapporto del gruppo di studio sui problemi di analisi economica e politica economica a breve termine, mimeo, Roma: Isco; then published as Il controllo dell’economia nel breve termine, II ed., Milano: Franco Angeli, 1972.Google Scholar
Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: an introduction, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jossa, B. (2010). Esiste un’alternativa al capitalismo? L’impresa democratica e l’attualità del marxismo, Roma: Manifestolibri.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, B. de (1945). Du pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance, Geneva: Les editions du cheval ailé; English edn., On power. Its nature and the history of its growth, New York: Viking Press, 1948; paperback edn., Boston: Beacon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 313–27.Google Scholar
Kalantzakos, S. (2018). China and the geopolitics of rare earths, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly, 14, 322–31; repr. in Kalecki M., Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–45.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoc; Italian transl. Fondazione della metafisica dei costumi, in Scritti morali, Torino: Utet, 1995.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence, Oxford: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–53.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on prabability, London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 8, London: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography, New York: Random House; Italian transl., Connectography, Roma: Fazi.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. (2022). La crisi finanziaria e le crisi prossime venture, mimeo, Conference on La crisi e le crisi, April 28, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma.Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M. (1990). Game theory and economic modelling, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lafargue, P. (1880). Le droit à la paresse. L’égalité; repr. Paris: Maspero, 1969.Google Scholar
Latouche, S. (2006). Le pari de la décroissance, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
Lazonick, W., Shin, J.-S. (2020). Predatory value extraction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Carré, J. (2001). The constant gardener, London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2001.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. ‘X-efficiency’. American Economic Review, 56, 392415.Google Scholar
Lepenies, W. (1990). Les trois cultures. Entre science et littérature, l’avènement de la sociologie, Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Levi, P. (1978). La chiave a stella, Torino: Einaudi; repr. 1991.Google Scholar
Levy, D. M. (2001). How the dismal science got its name, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (2004). Growing public, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1690). Two treatises of government, London: Awnsham and John Churchill; repr. London: J. M. Dent (Everyman’s Library), 1975.Google Scholar
Lombard (1980). Soldi truccati. I segreti del sistema Sindona, Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Longo, L. (1957). Revisionismo nuovo e antico, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Lucarelli, S., Perone, G. (2018). La loggia P2 e il mondo finanziario italiano. Alcune evidenze empiriche basate sulla social network analysis. Moneta e Credito, 71(284), 369–90.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974). Power. A radical view, London: Macmillan; II ed., Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Macaluso, E., Petruccioli, C. (2021). Comunisti a modo nostro, Venezia: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. [1513] (1960). Il principe, Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in chains: the deep history of the radical right’s stealth plan for America, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Maffei, L. (2021). Ai bambini bisogna dare una stessa linea di partenza. Avvenire, June 17, p. 3.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1986–2012). The sources of social power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1. A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760, 1986; 2. The rise of classes and nation states, 1760–1914, 1993; 3. Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945, 2012; 4. Globalizations, 1945–2011, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchionatti, R. (2020). Un classico di sorprendente attualità. Postfazione to the Italian transl. of Sahlins, 1972, pp. 439–52.Google Scholar
Marris, R. (1964). The economic theory of ‘managerial’ capitalism, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1844). Zur Kritick des Hegel’schen Rechts-Philosophie. Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, Paris, 2, 71–85; Italian transl., Critica della filosofia del diritto di Hegel. Introduzione. In Annali franco-tedeschi, Bravo G. M. ed., Milano: Edizioni del Gallo, 1965, pp. 124–42.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1859). Zur Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie, Berlin: Dietz; trad. it., Per la critica dell’economia politica, Roma: Editori riuniti, 1957; II ed., 1969.Google Scholar
Marx, K., [1844] (1932). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. In Karl Marx – Friedrich Engels Historisc-kritische Gesamtausgabe, Adoratskij, V. ed., Berlin: Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA); Italian transl., Manoscritti economico-filosofici del 1844, Torino: Einaudi, 1949, II ed., 1968.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867–94). Das Kapital, 3 vols., Hamburg: O. Meissner; Italian transl., Il capitale, Roma: Editori Riuniti, 1968.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1878). Kritik des Gothaer Programms. Die Neue Zeit, 18; Italian transl., Critica del programma di Gotha, Roma: Samonà e Savelli, 1968. [English transl. in Marx K., F. Engels, Basic writings on politics and philosophy, Feuer L. S. ed., Doubleday, 1959, pp. 153–173.]Google Scholar
Marx, K. (2020). Sull’Irlanda, Roma: Pgreco.Google Scholar
Mazzoni, A., Malaguti, M. C. (2019). Diritto del commercio internazionale. Fondamenti e prospettive, Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., Powers, B. R. (1986). The global village, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies, New York: William Morrow; II ed., 1950; III ed., 1963; Italian transl., Sesso e temperamento, Milano: il Saggiatore, 2020.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press – Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press – Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty, London: John W. Park; repr. in Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government, London: Dent, 1910.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. Fraser’s Magazine, 64, 383–4; repr. in Mill J. S. and J. Bentham, Utilitarianism and other essays, London: Dent, 1910, pp. 272–338.Google Scholar
Mills, C. (1997). The racial contract, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, W. (1956). The power elite, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1975). John Maynard Keynes, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1982). Can ‘It’ happen again? Essays on instability and finance, Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy, New Haven: Yale University Press; new ed., New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1990). Schumpeter e la finanza. In Biasco, S., Roncaglia, A., Salvati, M., eds., Istituzioni e mercato nello sviluppo economico, Roma-Bari: Laterza, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (2013). Ending poverty: jobs, not welfare, Annandale-on-Hudson: Levy Economics Institute,.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams. Economics becomes a cyborg science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., Plehwe, D., eds. (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin: the making of the neoliberal thought collective, Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F., Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 161–97.Google Scholar
Montanaro, E., Tonveronachi, M. (2012). Financial re-regulation at a crossroad: how the European experience strengthens the case for a radical reform built on Minsky’s approach. PSL Quarterly Review, 65(163), 335–83.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C.-L. de Secondat de (1748). De l’esprit des lois, 2 vols., Genève: Barillot et Fils; English transl., The spirit of the laws, Cohler A. M., B. C. Miller, H. S. Stone eds., Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
More, T. (1516). Utopia, Lovanio: T. Martens; Italian transl., Utopia, Torino: Utet, 1971.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. (1974). The nationalization of the masses, New York: Howard Ferting.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. (1977). Intervista sul nazismo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. (1980). Masses and man. Nationalist and Fascist perceptions of reality, New York: Howard Ferting.Google Scholar
Mozaffari, M. (1987). Authority in Islam, Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Neale, A. D. (1970). The antitrust laws of the U.S.A., II ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 4890.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (2011). Forces of production. Social history of industrial automation, Abingdon: Routledge; II ed., 2017.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2008). A question of balance, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1999). Women and human development: the capabilities approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nuzzi, G. (2009). Vaticano S.p.A., Milano: chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Nye, J. (1990). Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power, New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Oddo, G., Pons, G. (2002). L’affare Telecom, Milano: Sperling.Google Scholar
Onfray, M. (2019). Théorie de la dictature, Paris: Robert Laffont; Italian transl., Teoria della dittatura, Milano: Ponte alle grazie, 2020.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930). La rebelión de las masas, Madrid: Ediciones de la Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
Paci, M. (2013). Lezioni di sociologia storica, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pacini, G. (2021). La spia intoccabile, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1896). La courbe de la répartition de la richesse. In Recueil publié par la Faculté de Droit del’Université de Lausanne à l’occasion de l’Exposition nationale de 1896, pp. 373–87; Italian transl., La curva di ripartizione della ricchezza. In Corsi, 1995, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Pasquino, G. (1997). Corso di scienza politica, Bologna: il Mulino; II ed., 2000.Google Scholar
Pasquino, G. (2019). Bobbio e Sartori, Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
Patel, P. (2021). The tyranny of nations, New York: Bifocal Press.Google Scholar
Pease, R. S., Darvas, J., Steinmetz, K., Flowers, R. H., Gouni, L., Grieger, G., Köberlein, K., Roncaglia, A. (1989). Environmental, safety-related and economic potential of fusion power, Main report by the EEF Study Group, Warrington (UK): Progressive Engineering Consultants.Google Scholar
Perroux, F. (1950). The domination effect and modern economic theory. Social research, 17, 188206; repr. in Rothschild, 1971, pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
Petty, W. (1690). Political Arithmetick, London: Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock; repr. in Petty W., Economic writings, Hull C. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 233–313.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2013). Le capital au XXIe siècle, Paris: Editions du Seuil; English transl., Capital in the twenty-first century, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2014; Italian transl., Il capitale nel XXI secolo, Milano: Bompiani, 2014.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2019). Capital et idéologie, Paris: Editions du Seuil; Italian transl., Capitale e ideologia, Milano: La nave di Teseo, 2020.Google Scholar
Pinotti, F. (2021). Potere massonico, Milano: Chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Piselli, F., ed. (1995). Reti. L’analisi di network nelle scienze sociali, Roma: Donzelli; II ed., 2001.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A. (1963). Le organizzazioni, il potere e i conflitti di classe. Introduzione. In Dahrendorf 1959, Italian transl., pp. v–xxxv,Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1968). Primitive, archaic and modern economies. Essays of Karl Polanyi, Dalton G. ed., New York: Doubleday; repr. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1944–45). The poverty of historicism. Economica, 11, 86103 and 119–37; 12, 69–89; repr., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies, 2 vols., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pownall, T. (1776). A letter from Governor Pownall to Adam Smith, L.L.D. F.R.S., being an examination of several points of doctrine, laid down in his ‘Inquiry in to the nature and causes of the wealth of nations’, London; repr., New York: Augustus MK. Kelley, 1967; repr. in A. Smith, Correspondence, Mossner E.C., I.S. Ross eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977, pp. 337–76.Google Scholar
Prebish, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American communities, New York: Touchstone – Simon & Schuster; Italian transl., Capitale sociale e individualismo, Bologna: il Mulino, 2004.Google Scholar
Ragazzi, G. (2008). I Signori delle autostrade, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation, John Murray, London; repr. as vol. 1 in Works and correspondence, Sraffa P. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951–55.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1977). Petty: la nascita dell’economia politica. Milano: Etas Libri; English transl., Petty. The origins of political economy. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1985.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1983). L’economia del petrolio. Roma-Bari: Laterza. English transl., The international oil market. London: Macmillan 1985.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1989). Research in fusion as investment. Giornale degli economisti, 48(7–8), 293307.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2001). La ricchezza delle idee, Roma-Bari: Laterza; IV ed., 2009; English transl, The wealth of ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2005). Il mito della mano invisibile, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2009). Piero Sraffa, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2010). Economisti che sbagliano, Roma-Bari: Laterza; English transl., Why the economists got it wrong. The crisis and its cultural roots, London: Anthem press, 2010.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2012). L’economia della P2. In Amari, G., Vinci, A., eds., Le notti della democrazia, Roma: Ediesse, pp. 97101.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2015). Institutions, resources and the common weal. In Baranzini, M., Rotondi, C., Scazzieri, R., eds., Resources, production and structural dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–78.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2019). The age of disgregation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A., Villetti, R. (2007). Divisione del lavoro: capitalismo, socialismo, utopia. In Dosi, G., Marcuzzo, M. C., eds., L’economia e la politica. Saggi in onore di Michele Salvati, Bologna: il Mulino, pp. 265–83.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, G. (2018). L’età della frammentazione, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Rosselli, C., [1930] (1945). Socialismo liberale, Garosci A. ed., Roma-Firenze-Milano: Edizioni U; new ed., Torino: Einaudi, 1973; repr., 1997.Google Scholar
Rosselli, C. (2020). Scritti inediti di economia (1924–1927), Ghiandelli E. ed., Milano: Biblion.Google Scholar
Rossi, E. (1946). Abolire la miseria, La fiaccola; repr., Sylos Labini P. ed., Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1977.Google Scholar
Rossi, E. (1955). I padroni del vapore, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. (2007). Max Weber. Una idea di Occidente, Roma: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (1994). Adam Smith and the invisible hand. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 84, 319–22.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E., (2001). Economic sentiments, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K. (1971). Power in economics, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Du contrat social, Amsterdam: M. Rey.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1938). Power, Abington: Routledge; repr., 2004.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics, New York: de Gruyter; new ed., London: Routledge, 2017; Italian transl., L’economia dell’età della pietra, Milano: elèuthera, 2020.Google Scholar
Sales, I. (2021). La sfida di Falcone che tolse ai mafiosi l’antica impunità. Repubblica, March 23, pp. 14–5.Google Scholar
Salvaggiulo, G., ed. (2020). Io sono il potere. Confessioni di un capo di gabinetto, Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Salvati, M. (1967). Sviluppo economico e recessione nelle Relazioni della Banca d’Italia, Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Sampson, A. (1973). The secret history of ITT, London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1971). Understanding the Marxian notion of exploitation; a summary of the so-called transformation problem between Marxian values and competitive prices. Journal of Economic Literature, 9, 399431.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2020). The tyranny of merit, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Santambrogio, M. (2021). Il complotto contro il merito, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited, Chatam: Chatam house.Google Scholar
Sasso, G. (1984). Tramonto di un mito, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Scalfari, E. (1984). I difficili destini del lodo Visentini. Repubblica, November 11.Google Scholar
Scalfari, E., Turani, G. (1974). Razza padrona, Milano. Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Schmoller, G. (1914). On class conflict in general. American Journal of Sociology, 20, 504–31.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1908). Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; Italian transl., L’essenza e i principi dell’economia teorica, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, New York: Harpers & Bro.; II ed., 1947; III ed., 1950.Google Scholar
Sciarrone, R. (1998). Mafie vecchie, mafie nuove, Roma: Donzelli; II ed., 2009.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom, New York; Knopf.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2002). Globalizzazione e libertà, Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence, New York-London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2007). La libertà individuale come impegno sociale, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Sen, A., Williams, B., eds. (1982). Utilitarianism and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Italian transl., Utilitarismo e oltre, Milano: Mondadori, 1984, II ed., 1990.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In McGuire, C. B., Radner, C., eds., Decision and organisation, Amsterdam: North Holland,, pp. 161–76.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1993). Altruism and economics. American Economic Review, 83, 156–61.Google Scholar
Sirianni, C. (1981). Classi, produzione e potere: un’analisi critica delle dimensioni utopistiche della teoria marxiana. Quaderni piacentini, 1, 5785 and 2, 3–35.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments, London: A. Millar; Raphael D.D., A.L. Macfie eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; Campbell R. H., A. S. Skinner eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1795). Essays on philosophical subjects, London: T. Cadell and W. Davies; Wightman W.P.D., J.C. Bryce eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1983). Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, Bryce J. C. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1963). The two cultures and a second look, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spini, G. (1992). Le origini del socialismo, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Spinelli, A., Rossi, E. (1944). Per un’Europa libera e unita. Progetto di un manifesto, Milano: Edizioni del Mondadori, 2006.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1924). Problemi di oggi e di domani. L’ordine nuovo, 1(3–4), April 1–15, 4 (letter to A. Gramsci published anonimously).Google Scholar
Stajano, C. (1991). Un eroe borghese. Il caso dell’avvocato Ambrosoli assassinato dalla mafia politica, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Steindl, J. (1952). Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell; repr., New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change: the Stern review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2009). A blueprint for a safer planet: how to manage climate change and create a new era of progress and prosperity, London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–74.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1956). Oligopolio e progresso tecnico, Milano: Giuffrè; IV ed., Torino: Einaudi, 1967.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1965). Le radici della mafia in Sicilia, Deposizione alla Commissione parlamentare d’inchiesta sul fenomeno della mafia in Sicilia, June 21; repr. in Sylos Labini, Problemi dello sviluppo economico, Bari: Laterza, 1970, pp. 179–90.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1974). Saggio sulle classi sociali, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1984). Le forze dello sviluppo e del declino, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1995). La crisi italiana, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (2001). Un paese a civiltà limitata, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (2006). Ahi serva Italia, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Tabellini, G. (2018). Prefazione all’edizione italiana. In Cahuc P., Zylberberg A., 2017, Italian transl. 2018.Google Scholar
Tarantelli, E. (1986). Economia politica del lavoro, Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (2017). Republic of equals. Predistribution and property-owning democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toporowski, J. (2000). The end of finance. Capital market inflation, financial derivatives and pension fund capitalism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2021). Corruption perceptions index 2020, www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzlGoogle Scholar
Triffin, R. (1960). Gold and the dollar crisis, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Trigilia, C. (1992). Sviluppo senza autonomia, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Trigilia, C., ed. (2020). Capitalismi e democrazie, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on reports, accounting and management (1978a). Voting rights in major corporations, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on reports, accounting and management (1978b). Interlocking directorates among the major U.S. corporations, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2002). Mill on democracy. From the Athenian polis to representative government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2020). Pochi contro molti. Il conflitto politico nel XXI secolo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Van Horn, R., Mirowski, P. (2009). The rise of the Chicago school of economics and the birth of neoliberalism. In Mirowski and Plehwe, pp. 139–78.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (2017). Chi comanda nella città. I Greci e il potere, Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. (1970). The general theory of labor managed market economies, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Villetti, R. (1978). Lavoro diviso e lavoro costrittivo. In Villetti, R., ed., Socialismo e divisione del lavoro, Quaderni di Mondoperaio, n. 8, Roma: Mondo Operaio-Edizioni Avanti!, pp. ix–lxxii; repr. in Villetti, 2021, pp. 31–80.Google Scholar
Villetti, R. (2021). La strategia delle riforme, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Vinci, A., ed. (2011). I diari segreti di Tina Anselmi, Milano: chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1974, 1980, 1989). The modern world-system, vols. 1, 2, 3, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904–5). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20–21; II ed., in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Tübingen: Mohr, 1922; Italian transl., L’etica protestante e lo spirito del capitalismo, Firenze: Sansoni, 1965.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1919). Politik als Beruf, Wissenschaft als Beruf, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; Italian transl., Il lavoro intellettuale come professione, Torino: Einaudi, 1948; repr. 1976.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922a). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr; Italian transl., Il metodo delle scienze storico-sociali, Torino: Einaudi, 1958; repr. Milano: Oscar Mondadori, 1980.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922b). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2 vols., Tübingen: Mohr; Italian transl., Economia e società, 2 vols., Milano: Edizioni di Comunità, 1962.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1923). Wirtschaftsgeschichte: Abriss der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftgeschichte, Berlin: Dunker & Humblot; Italian transl. of the III ed., Storia economica, Roma: Donzelli, 1993.Google Scholar
Weil, D. (2014). The fissured workplace, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1975). A theory of profits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033. An essay on education and society, London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Zinn, D. L. (2001). La raccomandazione. Clientelismo vecchio e nuovo, Roma: Donzelli.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×