Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:04:56.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - A Race to the Top? The Aid Transparency Index and the Social Power of Global Performance Indicators

from Part II - The Normative Influence of Ratings and Rankings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2020

By
Dan Honig  and
Catherine Weaver
Edited by
Judith G. Kelley  and
Beth A. Simmons
Judith G. Kelley
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Recent studies on Global Performance Indicators (GPIs) reveal the distinct power that non-state actors can accrue and exercise in world politics. How and when does this happen? Using a mixed-methods approach, we examine the impact of the Aid Transparency Index (ATI), an annual rating and rankings index produced by the small UK-based NGO Publish What You Fund. The ATI seeks to shape development aid donors’ behavior with respect to their transparency – the quality and kind of information they publicly disclose. To investigate the ATI’s effect, we construct an original panel dataset of donor transparency performance before and after ATI inclusion (2006–2013) to test whether, and which, donors alter their behavior in response to inclusion in the ATI. To further probe the causal mechanisms that explain variations in donor behavior we use qualitative research, including over 150 key informant interviews conducted between 2010 and 2017. Our analysis uncovers the conditions under which the ATI influences powerful aid donors. Moreover, our mixed methods evidence reveals how this happens. Consistent with Kelley and Simmons’ central argument that Global Performance Indicators (GPIs) exercise influence via social pressure, we find that the ATI shapes donor behavior primarily via direct effects on elites: the diffusion of professional norms, organizational learning, and peer pressure.

Keywords

Global Performance IndicatorsAid Transparencynorm diffusion
Type
Chapter
Information
The Power of Global Performance Indicators , pp. 139 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barder, Owen. 2016. Aid Transparency: Are We Nearly There? Center for Global Development, April 13, 2016. Available at www.cgdev.org/blog/aid-transparency-are-we-nearly-there.Google Scholar
Bent, Rodney. 2015. A Sad State of Affairs: Is Transparency a Solution? Publish What You Fund blog, September 23. Available at http://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/updates/by-country/us/state-transparency-solution/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Bisbee, James H., Hollyer, James R, Peter Rosendorff, B, and Raymond Vreeland, James. this volume. The Millennium Development Goals and Education: Accountability and Substitution in Global Indicators. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhushan, Aniket, and Bond, Rebekka. 2013. Open Data, Transparency and International Development. Summary Report for the North-South Institute, November. Available at http://www.nsi-ins.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/2013-Open-Data-Summary-Report.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Buntaine, Mark T. 2016. Giving Aid Effectively. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, and Brechenmacher, Saskia. 2014. Accountability, Transparency, Participation and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus? Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at http://carnegieendowment.org/files/new_development_consensus.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Clare, Ali, Verhulst, Stefaan, and Young, Andrew. 2016. OpenAid in Sweden: Enhanced Transparency and Accountability in Development Cooperation. Report for the GovLab, in collaboration with the Omidyar Network. Available at http://odimpact.org/case-openaid-in-sweden.html. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Collin, Matt, Zubairi, Asma, Nielson, Daniel and Barder, Owen. 2009. The Costs and Benefits of Aid Transparency: A Draft Analytical Framework. Avalable at https://iatistandard.org/documents/482/1140-100407-Framework-for-Costs-and-Benefits-of-transparency-with-Annexes.pdf.Google Scholar
Darby, Sefton. 2010. Natural Resource Governance: New Frontiers in Transparency and Accountability. London, UK: Transparency and Accountability Initiative, Open Society Foundation. Available at http://www.transparency-initiative.org/uncategorized/613/natural-resource-governance-new-frontiers-in-transparency-and-accountability/.Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Doshi, Rush, Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Best A.. 2019. The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business Indicator as a form of Social Pressure. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Susan. 2014. The Not-So-Great Aid Debate. Third World Quarterly 35 (8):1374–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Sauder, Michael. 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113 (1):1–40.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 2007. The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friends of Publish What You Fund. 2016. How Can Data Revolutionize Development? Putting Data at the Center of US Global Development: An Assessment of US Foreign Aid Transparency. Available at http://media.wix.com/ugd/9a0ffd_2ce18150803b48989905acabf9bb91d6.pdf.Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Gaventa, John, and McGee, Rosemary. 2013. The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. Development Policy Review 31 (S1):S3–28.Google Scholar
George, Hannah. 2012. Raising the Bar on Transparency, Accountability and Openness. World Bank’s Inside the Web. (Blog.) February 16. Available at http://blogs.worldbank.org/insidetheweb/raising-the-bar-on-transparency-accountability-and-openness. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2002. Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (6):873–93.Google Scholar
Gulrajani, Nilima. 2011. Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate: Managerialism, Radicalism and the Search for Aid Effectiveness. Third World Quarterly 32 (2):199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Joni. 2015. USAID’s Strategic Approach to Improving IATI Compliance. August 13. Available at http://www.aidtransparency.net/news/usaids-strategic-approach-to-improving-iati-compliance. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. 2019. How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. Political Analysis (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hanlon, Joseph, Barrientos, Armando, and Hulme, David. 2010. Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Heather, and Marschner, Catherine. Millennium Challenge Corporation: Principles into Practice. Washington, DC: Millennium Challenge Corporation. Available at https://assets.mcc.gov/content/uploads/2017/05/paper-2015001163301-principles-transparency.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., eds. 2006. Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations and Principal-Agent Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrling, Sheila. 2015. The Business Proposition of Open Aid Data: Why Every US Agency Should Default to Transparency. Publish What You Fund (blog). Available at http://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/updates/by-country/us/business-proposition-open-aid-data-why-every-u-s-agency-should-default-transparency/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2011. Democracy and Transparency. Journal of Politics 73 (4):1191–205.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2014. Measuring Transparency. Political Analysis 22 (4):413–34.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2015. Transparency, Protest, and Autocratic Instability. American Political Science Review 109 (4):764–84.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2018a. Information, Democracy, and Autocracy: Economic Transparency and Political (In)Stability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2018b. Transparency, Protest and Democratic Stability. British Journal of Political Science 1–27.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan. 2018. Navigation by Judgment: Why and When Top-Down Control of Foreign Aid Doesn’t Work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan. 2019. When Reporting Undermines Performance: The Costs of Politically Constrained Autonomy in Foreign Aid Implementation. International Organization 73 (1):171–201.Google Scholar
Ingram, George. 2015. Making Aid Transparency a Reality. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2015/02/11/making-aid-transparency-a-reality/. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2014. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2019. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence Their Reputation and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie and Lipscy, Phillip. 2019. The Politics of International Testing. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koeberle, Stefan. 2016. The World Bank Is Again in the Top Ten of the Aid Transparency Index. The World Bank Data Blog. March 3. Available at https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/world-bank-again-top0-aid-transparency-index.Google Scholar
Koliev, Faradj, Sommerer, Thomas, and Tallberg, Jonas. 2019. Reporting Matters: Performance Assessment and Compliance in the ILO. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Sung. 2016. The Data Revolution That’s Reshaping American Foreign Assistance. US Global Leadership Coalition. (Blog). May 11. Available at http://www.usglc.org/blog/the-data-revolution-thats-reshaping-american-foreign-assistance/.Google Scholar
Marks, Joseph. 2012. USAID Plans to Map All Its Spending Data in Some Countries. January 19. Available at http://www.nextgov.com/technology-news/2012/01/usaid-plans-to-map-all-its-spending-data-in-some-countries/50481/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia. 2019. Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. International Organization 73 (3).Google Scholar
Mulley, Sarah. 2010. Donor Aid: New Frontiers in Transparency and Accountability. Transparency and Accountability Initiative. Available at http://www.transparency-initiative.org/archive/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/donor_aid_final1.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Nelson, Paul J. 2001. Transparency Mechanisms at the Multilateral Development Banks. World Development 29 (11):1835–47.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2009. Transparency and Open Government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2009/m09-12.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Orszag, Peter. 2009. Open Government Directive. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at https://www.treasury.gov/open/Documents/m10-06.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. 2009. Briefing Paper 1: Why Aid Transparency Matters, and the Global Movement for Aid Transparency.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. (2011–2016). Aid Transparency Indices: 2011–2016. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. 2015a. 2015 EU Aid Transparency Review. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. 2015b. 2015 US Aid Transparency Review. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. Annual Reports of the Aid Transparency Index, 2011–2017. London: Publish What You Fund. Available at http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
Publish What You Fund. Publish What You Fund Annual Report 2017. London: Publish What You Fund. Available at https://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/download/11964/. Accessed February 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jordan and Tellez, Juan. 2019. Freedom House’s Scarlet Letter: Assessment Power Through Transnational Pressure. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saunder, Michael, and Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 2009. The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review 74 (1):63–82.Google Scholar
Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 2013. Full Committee Hearing: Nomination. November 19. Available at https://www.foreign.senate.gov/hearings/2013/11/19/nomination. Accessed February 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Skagerlind, Helena Hede. 2019. Power in Global Development Policy: The Millennium Development Goals. The Power of Global Performance Indicators, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thier, Alex, and Crumbly, Angelique. 2015. It’s Clear: Transparency Works. USAID Blogs, July 2. Available at https://blog.usaid.gov/2015/07/its-clear-transparency-works/. Accessed January 13, 2018.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Department for International Development. 2015. Key Topics in Transparency. Memo of the International Development Sector Transparency Panel, 5 March. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/attachment_data/file/441699/Key_topics_in_transparency_-_Paper_5_March_2015.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2018.Google Scholar
United States Agency for International Development. 2015. International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) Cost Management Plan. Washington, DC: USAID. Available at https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1870/IATI%20Cost%20Management%20Plan_u_14July2015.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine, and Peratsakis, Christian. 2014. Engineering Policy Norm Implementation: The World Bank’s Transparency Transformation. In Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice, edited by Betts, Alexander and Orchard, Phil, eds., 179–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×