Book contents
- Preclassical Conflict of Laws
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 153
- Preclassical Conflict of Laws
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures, Tables and Maps
- Maps
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I History and Historiography in the Conflict of Laws
- 2 Uses of History in Private International Law
- 3 Preclassical Conflict of Laws in the Historical Consciousness
- Part II Current Concerns
- Part III Bartolus da Sassoferrato and the Conflict of Laws in the Middle Ages
- Part IV Ulrik Huber and Conflict of Laws in the Early Modern Period
- Part V Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
3 - Preclassical Conflict of Laws in the Historical Consciousness
from Part I - History and Historiography in the Conflict of Laws
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2021
- Preclassical Conflict of Laws
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 153
- Preclassical Conflict of Laws
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures, Tables and Maps
- Maps
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I History and Historiography in the Conflict of Laws
- 2 Uses of History in Private International Law
- 3 Preclassical Conflict of Laws in the Historical Consciousness
- Part II Current Concerns
- Part III Bartolus da Sassoferrato and the Conflict of Laws in the Middle Ages
- Part IV Ulrik Huber and Conflict of Laws in the Early Modern Period
- Part V Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
Summary
Modern historical consciousness is ambivalent towards Medieval and Early Modern conflict of laws. The key to these attitudes is found in classical conflict of laws, and our relationship with it. We – modern private international lawyers – identify as the descendants of the private international lawyers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While remaining mindful of our own differences from these immediate ancestors, we also perceive them as having made a decisive break with their own Medieval and Early Modern ancestors. Which raises the question of how distant modern doctrine is from its preclassical counterpart: are we twice removed from our ancestors’ ancestors, or has modern doctrine been moving in a circular pattern?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Preclassical Conflict of Laws , pp. 93 - 136Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021