Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:24:16.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Alexander R. Pruss
Alexander R. Pruss
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Principle of Sufficient Reason
A Reassessment
 , pp. 323 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert M. (1981). “Actualism and Thisness.” Synthese 49, 3–42.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1977). “Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 109–117; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1974). “Theories of Actuality.” Noûs 8, 211–231; reprinted in Loux (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1972). “Must God Create the Best?” Philosophical Review 81 (1972), 317–332; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1993). “Causality and Determination.” In Sosa, E. and Tooley, M. (eds.), Causation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–104.Google Scholar
Appel, Kenneth, and Haken, Wolfgang (1989). Every Planar Map Is Four-Colorable. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1975). Summa Contra Gentiles; Book One: God. Translated by Anton C. Pegis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1949). On Being and Essence. Translated by Armand Maurer, C. S. B. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1947). Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Brothers.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Garber, Daniel, eds. and trans. (1989). G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bell, J. L. (1988). Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Belot, Gordon (2001). “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, James (1995). “The Hume-Edwards Principle.” Religious Studies 31, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, Craig (2004). “Measures, Explanations and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions Be Explained?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Joseph K. (1996). “Hume's Refutation of the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. (1964). “Human Freedom and the Self,” The Lindley Lecture, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas, pp. 3–15; reprinted in Feinberg and Shafer-Landau (2002), pp. 492–499.
Davey, Kevin, and Clifton, Robert (2001). “Insufficient Reason in the ‘New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 37 (2001), 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul (2001). “A Naturalistic Account of the Universe.” In Peterson, et al M.. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings. 2d ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–241.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. (2002). No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. (1998). The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walther (1985). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Zurich: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Divers, John (2002). Possible Worlds. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doyle, Arthur Conan (1927). The Complete Sherlock Holmes. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Earman, John (1986). A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgington, Dorothy (1995). “On Conditionals.” Mind 104 (1995), 235–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul (1959). “The Cosmological Argument.” In The Rationalist Annual for the Year 1959, London: Pemberton; reprinted in Burrill, Donald R. (ed.), The Cosmological Argument. New York: Doubleday, 1967.Google Scholar
Elga, Adam (2001). “Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence.” Philosophy of Science 68 (Suppl.) PSA 2000, S313–S324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1979). Value and Reality. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, and Shafer-Landau, Russ (2002). Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. 11th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1948). “Can God's Existence Be Disproved?” Mind 57, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. (1999). “Recent Work on Moral Responsibility.” Ethics 110, 92–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Peter (1996). God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, Peter (1981). “The Problem of Evil: Two Neglected Defenses.” Sophia 20, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Peter, and Armstrong, D. M. (1984). “An Argument against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francken, Patrick, and Geirsson, Heimir (1999). “Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments.” Journal of Philosophical Research 24, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1969). “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 66, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (2002a). “Divine Omniscience, Human Freedom, and Backward Causation.” Faith and Philosophy 19, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M., ed. (2002b). Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1999). The Divided Self of William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1991). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1976). Negation and Non-Being. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph, no. 10.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M., and Pruss, Alexander R., eds. (2003). The Existence of God. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M., and Pruss, Alexander R. (2002). “A Response to Oppy and to Davey and Clifton,” Religious Studies 38, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M., and Pruss, Alexander R. (1999). “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35 (1999), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, Jerome (2000). “Prospects for a Sound Stage-3 of Cosmological Arguments.” Religious Studies 36, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, C. I. (1960–61). Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmann; reprinted in CD-ROM form, Charlottesville, Va.: InteLex, 2001.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. (1987). “Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf (2004). “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 561–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf (1998). “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology.” Philo 1, 15–34; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf (1974). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Holland/Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1975). “The Identity of Indiscernibles.” Journal of Philosophy 72, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1964). The Language of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartle, J. B., and Hawking, Stephen W. (1983). “The Wave Function of the Universe.” Physical Review D 28, 2960–2975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, Stephen W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1974). “The Principle of Ground,” trans. Keith Hoeller. Man and World 7, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1927). “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher S. (1982). “On a Revised Version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honderich, Ted, ed. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1779). Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature.Google Scholar
Johnstone, , Henry, W. Jr., and Sider, David (1986). The Fragments of Parmenides. Bryn Mawr, Pa.: Thomas Library, Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert (1996). The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Katz, Bernard D., and Kremer, Elmar J. (1997). “The Cosmological Argument without the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Faith and Philosophy 14, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1998). Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koons, Robert C. (2000). Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Dharmendra (1973). “Necessity and the Law of Sufficient Reason – III,” Journal of the [Indian] Philosophical Association 14, 99–107.Google Scholar
Kuratowski, K., and Mostowski, A. (1976). Set Theory: With an Introduction to Descriptive Set Theory. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lang, Serge (1984). Algebra. 2nd ed. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Leckey, Martin, and Bigelow, John (1995). “The Necessitarian Perspective: Laws as Natural Entailments.” In Weinert, Friedel (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (1988). “A Modal Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, John (2001). Infinite Minds: A Philosophical Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1960). Miracles: A Preliminary Study. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1979). “Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow.” Noûs 13, 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1973). Counterfactuals. Malden, Mass./Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loux, Michael, ed. (1979). The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Ithaca, N.Y./London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, Jan (1961). “O determiniźmie.” In Słupiecki, J. (ed.), Z zagadnień logiki i filozofii; trans. Z. Jordan in McCall, S. (ed.), Polish Logic. Oxford: Clarendon, 1967.Google Scholar
Lycan, William (2002). “The Metaphysics of Possibilia.” In Gale (2002b), pp. 303–316.CrossRef
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mackie, Penelope (1998). “Identity, Time, and Necessity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, David (2002). “Comments on Alexander R. Pruss's paper ‘Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit: Arguments New and Old for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.’” Paper presented at the Society for Catholic Analytical Philosophy satellite meeting at the November 2002 meeting of the American Catholic Philosophical Association in Cincinnati.
McHarry, J. D. (1978). “A Theodicy.” Analysis 38, 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, N. David (1985). “Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory.” Physics Today, April 1985, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, N. David (1981). “Quantum Mysteries for Anyone.” Journal of Philosophy 78, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, Trenton (2004). “Split Brains and the Godhead.” In Crisp, T., Vanderlaan, D., and Davidson, M. (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.Google Scholar
Meyer, Robert K. (1987). “God Exists!” Noûs 21, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Barry (1983). “Why Ever Should Any Existing Individual Exist?” Review of Metaphysics 37, 287–326.Google Scholar
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1970). Gravitation. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Neta, Ram (1997). The Instability of Scepticism. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Nowacki, Mark R. (1998). “Whatever Comes to Be Has a Cause of Its Coming to Be: A Thomistic Defense of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” The Thomist 62, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppy, Graham (2000). “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 36, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, Ullin T. (1997). “‘De re’ Modality without Possible Worlds.” Acta Analytica, pp. 129–143.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1983). “On Existentialism.” Philosophical Studies 44, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974a). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974b). God, Freedom and Evil. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Plato (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (manuscript). Worlds, Possibilities and Actualities.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (forthcoming). “Prophecy without Middle Knowledge.” Faith and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2004a). “A Restricted Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 40, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2004b). “David Lewis's Counterfactual Arrow of Time.” Noûs 37, 606–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2001). “The Cardinality Objection to David Lewis's Modal Realism.” Philosophical Studies 104 (2001), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (1998). “The Hume-Edwards Principle and the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43, 149–165; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1980). “Models and Reality.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 45, 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Bruce R. (1972). The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (2000a). Nature and Understanding: The Metaphysics and Method of Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (2000b). Kant and the Reach of Reason. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1995). Satisfying Reason: Studies in the Theory of Knowledge. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1991). G. W. Leibniz's Monadology: An Edition for Students. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Hugh (2000). God and Goodness. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkrantz, Gary S. (1993). Haecceity: An Ontological Essay. Dordrech/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, James F. (1969). Philosophical Theology. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1984). “Rationalistic Theology and Some Principles of Explanation.” Faith and Philosophy 1, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1975). The Cosmological Argument. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1970). “Two Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument.” The Monist 54, 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, Bede (1986). “Induction and Justification.” American Philosophical Quarterly 23, 115–123.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald P. (1992). “Leibniz's Principle of Intelligibility.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9, 35–49.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lionel S. (2001). “‘The Transition from Sensibility to Reason In Regressu’: Indeterminism in Kant's Reflexionen.” Kant-Studien 92, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, David, and Johnstone, H. R. Jr. (1986). Parmenides: The Fragments. Bryn Mawr: Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2002). “The Ersatz Pluriverse.” Journal of Philosophy 99 (2002): 279–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, Lawrence (1993). Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C., and Haldane, J. J. (1996). Atheism and Theism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin (2002). “The Incompatibility of STR and the Tensed Theory of Time.” In Oaklander, L. N. (ed.), The Importance of Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1995). “A Defense of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1994a). “Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism.” Analysis 54, 236–243; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1994b). “Can Everything Come to Be without a Cause?” Dialogue 33, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Alfred (1969). “A Philosopher Looks at Science.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 7, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Thomas D. (1994). “On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Dialogue 33, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard G. (1968). “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43 (1968), pp. 199–212; reprinted in Baruch A. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion: An Analytic Approach. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, pp. 189–201.CrossRef
Taylor, Richard C. (1974). Metaphysics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (2003). “The Many-Universes Solution to the Problem of Evil.” In Gale and Pruss (2003), pp. 143–159.
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (1994). Cosmoi: The Best of All Possible Worlds. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994.
Vallicella, William F. (1997). “On an Insufficient Argument against Sufficient Reason.” Ratio (new series) 10, 76–81.Google Scholar
Inwagen, Peter (1983). An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, David E. (1979). “An Argument for God's Existence.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1981). “Actualism and Thisness.” Synthese 49, 3–42.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1977). “Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 109–117; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1974). “Theories of Actuality.” Noûs 8, 211–231; reprinted in Loux (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1972). “Must God Create the Best?” Philosophical Review 81 (1972), 317–332; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1993). “Causality and Determination.” In Sosa, E. and Tooley, M. (eds.), Causation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–104.Google Scholar
Appel, Kenneth, and Haken, Wolfgang (1989). Every Planar Map Is Four-Colorable. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1975). Summa Contra Gentiles; Book One: God. Translated by Anton C. Pegis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1949). On Being and Essence. Translated by Armand Maurer, C. S. B. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1947). Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Brothers.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Garber, Daniel, eds. and trans. (1989). G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bell, J. L. (1988). Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Belot, Gordon (2001). “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, James (1995). “The Hume-Edwards Principle.” Religious Studies 31, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, Craig (2004). “Measures, Explanations and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions Be Explained?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Joseph K. (1996). “Hume's Refutation of the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. (1964). “Human Freedom and the Self,” The Lindley Lecture, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas, pp. 3–15; reprinted in Feinberg and Shafer-Landau (2002), pp. 492–499.
Davey, Kevin, and Clifton, Robert (2001). “Insufficient Reason in the ‘New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 37 (2001), 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul (2001). “A Naturalistic Account of the Universe.” In Peterson, et al M.. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings. 2d ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–241.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. (2002). No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. (1998). The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walther (1985). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Zurich: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Divers, John (2002). Possible Worlds. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doyle, Arthur Conan (1927). The Complete Sherlock Holmes. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Earman, John (1986). A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgington, Dorothy (1995). “On Conditionals.” Mind 104 (1995), 235–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul (1959). “The Cosmological Argument.” In The Rationalist Annual for the Year 1959, London: Pemberton; reprinted in Burrill, Donald R. (ed.), The Cosmological Argument. New York: Doubleday, 1967.Google Scholar
Elga, Adam (2001). “Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence.” Philosophy of Science 68 (Suppl.) PSA 2000, S313–S324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1979). Value and Reality. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, and Shafer-Landau, Russ (2002). Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. 11th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1948). “Can God's Existence Be Disproved?” Mind 57, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. (1999). “Recent Work on Moral Responsibility.” Ethics 110, 92–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Peter (1996). God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, Peter (1981). “The Problem of Evil: Two Neglected Defenses.” Sophia 20, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Peter, and Armstrong, D. M. (1984). “An Argument against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francken, Patrick, and Geirsson, Heimir (1999). “Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments.” Journal of Philosophical Research 24, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1969). “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 66, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (2002a). “Divine Omniscience, Human Freedom, and Backward Causation.” Faith and Philosophy 19, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M., ed. (2002b). Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1999). The Divided Self of William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1991). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1976). Negation and Non-Being. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph, no. 10.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M., and Pruss, Alexander R., eds. (2003). The Existence of God. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M., and Pruss, Alexander R. (2002). “A Response to Oppy and to Davey and Clifton,” Religious Studies 38, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M., and Pruss, Alexander R. (1999). “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35 (1999), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, Jerome (2000). “Prospects for a Sound Stage-3 of Cosmological Arguments.” Religious Studies 36, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, C. I. (1960–61). Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmann; reprinted in CD-ROM form, Charlottesville, Va.: InteLex, 2001.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. (1987). “Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf (2004). “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 561–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf (1998). “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology.” Philo 1, 15–34; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf (1974). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Holland/Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1975). “The Identity of Indiscernibles.” Journal of Philosophy 72, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1964). The Language of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartle, J. B., and Hawking, Stephen W. (1983). “The Wave Function of the Universe.” Physical Review D 28, 2960–2975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, Stephen W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1974). “The Principle of Ground,” trans. Keith Hoeller. Man and World 7, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1927). “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher S. (1982). “On a Revised Version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honderich, Ted, ed. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1779). Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature.Google Scholar
Johnstone, , Henry, W. Jr., and Sider, David (1986). The Fragments of Parmenides. Bryn Mawr, Pa.: Thomas Library, Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert (1996). The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Katz, Bernard D., and Kremer, Elmar J. (1997). “The Cosmological Argument without the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Faith and Philosophy 14, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1998). Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koons, Robert C. (2000). Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Dharmendra (1973). “Necessity and the Law of Sufficient Reason – III,” Journal of the [Indian] Philosophical Association 14, 99–107.Google Scholar
Kuratowski, K., and Mostowski, A. (1976). Set Theory: With an Introduction to Descriptive Set Theory. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lang, Serge (1984). Algebra. 2nd ed. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Leckey, Martin, and Bigelow, John (1995). “The Necessitarian Perspective: Laws as Natural Entailments.” In Weinert, Friedel (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (1988). “A Modal Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, John (2001). Infinite Minds: A Philosophical Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1960). Miracles: A Preliminary Study. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1979). “Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow.” Noûs 13, 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1973). Counterfactuals. Malden, Mass./Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loux, Michael, ed. (1979). The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Ithaca, N.Y./London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, Jan (1961). “O determiniźmie.” In Słupiecki, J. (ed.), Z zagadnień logiki i filozofii; trans. Z. Jordan in McCall, S. (ed.), Polish Logic. Oxford: Clarendon, 1967.Google Scholar
Lycan, William (2002). “The Metaphysics of Possibilia.” In Gale (2002b), pp. 303–316.CrossRef
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mackie, Penelope (1998). “Identity, Time, and Necessity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, David (2002). “Comments on Alexander R. Pruss's paper ‘Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit: Arguments New and Old for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.’” Paper presented at the Society for Catholic Analytical Philosophy satellite meeting at the November 2002 meeting of the American Catholic Philosophical Association in Cincinnati.
McHarry, J. D. (1978). “A Theodicy.” Analysis 38, 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, N. David (1985). “Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory.” Physics Today, April 1985, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, N. David (1981). “Quantum Mysteries for Anyone.” Journal of Philosophy 78, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, Trenton (2004). “Split Brains and the Godhead.” In Crisp, T., Vanderlaan, D., and Davidson, M. (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.Google Scholar
Meyer, Robert K. (1987). “God Exists!” Noûs 21, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Barry (1983). “Why Ever Should Any Existing Individual Exist?” Review of Metaphysics 37, 287–326.Google Scholar
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1970). Gravitation. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Neta, Ram (1997). The Instability of Scepticism. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Nowacki, Mark R. (1998). “Whatever Comes to Be Has a Cause of Its Coming to Be: A Thomistic Defense of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” The Thomist 62, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppy, Graham (2000). “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 36, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, Ullin T. (1997). “‘De re’ Modality without Possible Worlds.” Acta Analytica, pp. 129–143.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1983). “On Existentialism.” Philosophical Studies 44, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974a). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974b). God, Freedom and Evil. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Plato (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (manuscript). Worlds, Possibilities and Actualities.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (forthcoming). “Prophecy without Middle Knowledge.” Faith and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2004a). “A Restricted Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 40, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2004b). “David Lewis's Counterfactual Arrow of Time.” Noûs 37, 606–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2001). “The Cardinality Objection to David Lewis's Modal Realism.” Philosophical Studies 104 (2001), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (1998). “The Hume-Edwards Principle and the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43, 149–165; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1980). “Models and Reality.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 45, 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Bruce R. (1972). The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (2000a). Nature and Understanding: The Metaphysics and Method of Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (2000b). Kant and the Reach of Reason. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1995). Satisfying Reason: Studies in the Theory of Knowledge. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1991). G. W. Leibniz's Monadology: An Edition for Students. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Hugh (2000). God and Goodness. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkrantz, Gary S. (1993). Haecceity: An Ontological Essay. Dordrech/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, James F. (1969). Philosophical Theology. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1984). “Rationalistic Theology and Some Principles of Explanation.” Faith and Philosophy 1, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1975). The Cosmological Argument. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1970). “Two Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument.” The Monist 54, 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, Bede (1986). “Induction and Justification.” American Philosophical Quarterly 23, 115–123.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald P. (1992). “Leibniz's Principle of Intelligibility.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9, 35–49.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lionel S. (2001). “‘The Transition from Sensibility to Reason In Regressu’: Indeterminism in Kant's Reflexionen.” Kant-Studien 92, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, David, and Johnstone, H. R. Jr. (1986). Parmenides: The Fragments. Bryn Mawr: Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2002). “The Ersatz Pluriverse.” Journal of Philosophy 99 (2002): 279–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, Lawrence (1993). Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C., and Haldane, J. J. (1996). Atheism and Theism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin (2002). “The Incompatibility of STR and the Tensed Theory of Time.” In Oaklander, L. N. (ed.), The Importance of Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1995). “A Defense of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1994a). “Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism.” Analysis 54, 236–243; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1994b). “Can Everything Come to Be without a Cause?” Dialogue 33, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Alfred (1969). “A Philosopher Looks at Science.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 7, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Thomas D. (1994). “On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Dialogue 33, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard G. (1968). “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43 (1968), pp. 199–212; reprinted in Baruch A. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion: An Analytic Approach. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, pp. 189–201.CrossRef
Taylor, Richard C. (1974). Metaphysics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (2003). “The Many-Universes Solution to the Problem of Evil.” In Gale and Pruss (2003), pp. 143–159.
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (1994). Cosmoi: The Best of All Possible Worlds. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994.
Vallicella, William F. (1997). “On an Insufficient Argument against Sufficient Reason.” Ratio (new series) 10, 76–81.Google Scholar
Inwagen, Peter (1983). An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, David E. (1979). “An Argument for God's Existence.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Alexander R. Pruss, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: The Principle of Sufficient Reason
  • Online publication: 27 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498992.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Alexander R. Pruss, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: The Principle of Sufficient Reason
  • Online publication: 27 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498992.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Alexander R. Pruss, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: The Principle of Sufficient Reason
  • Online publication: 27 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498992.021
Available formats
×