Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:18:55.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Embryologist Training: Embryo Transfer

from Section 1 - Starting a New Laboratory and Training Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2023

Markus H. M. Montag
Affiliation:
ilabcomm GmbH, St Augustin, Germany
Dean E. Morbeck
Affiliation:
Kindbody Inc, New York City
Get access

Summary

From a practical point of view, the culmination of excellent work in the IVF laboratory is the perfect transfer of the right embryos to the right part of the uterine cavity, aseptically and safely. As with all other tasks in the IVF laboratory, embryologists need to gain experience with embryo transfer (ET) techniques. Embryo loading in the different types of ET catheters, compared to ICSI or embryo biopsy, seems a fairly straightforward procedure but involves a great deal of responsibility. Excellent communication with doctors during ET, good embryo loading technique, training and proper traceability are key elements that will provide the quality needed for this simple but important step in assisted reproductive treatments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Principles of IVF Laboratory Practice
Laboratory Set-Up, Training and Daily Operation
, pp. 30 - 37
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboulfotouh, I., Abou-Setta, A. M., Khattab, S., et al. Firm versus soft embryo transfer catheters under ultrasound guidance: does catheter choice really influence the pregnancy rates? Fertil Steril 2008; 89(5):1261–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halvaei, I., Khalili, M. A., Razi, M. H., Agha-Rahimi, A. and Nottola, S. A. Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci 2013; 6(1):65–9.Google ScholarPubMed
De los Santos, M. J., Apter, S., Coticchio, G., et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod 2016; 31(4):685–6.Google Scholar
Ozturk Inal, Z. and Inal, H. A. The effect of embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization–intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: A prospective cohort study. Turk J Obstet Gyn 2021; 18(1):30–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Lopez, M. J., Garcia, D., Rodriguez, A., Colodron, M., Vassena, R. and Vernaeve, V. Individualized embryo transfer training: timing and performance. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(7):1432–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramaiah, S. D., Ray, K. A. and Reindollar, R. H. Simulation training for embryo transfer: findings from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Embryo Transfer Certificate Course. Fertil Steril 2021; 115(4):852–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoolcraft, W. B., Surrey, E. S. and Gardner, D. K. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril 2001; 76(5):863–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasqualini, R. S. and Quintans, C. J. Clinical practice of embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 4(1):8392.Google Scholar
Eytan, O., Elad, D. and Jaffa, A. J. Bioengineering studies of the embryo transfer procedure. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1101:2137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mo, J., Yang, Q., Xia, L. and Niu, Z. Embryo location in the uterus during embryo transfer: An in vitro simulation. PLoS ONE 2020; 15(10):e0240142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J., Buckingham, K., Buckett, W. and Abou-Setta, A. M. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database System Rev 2016; 3:CD006107.Google ScholarPubMed
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive M, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive T, Practice Committee of the Society of Reproductive B, Technologists. Electronic address aao. Minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2020; 113(3):536–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×