Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:30:53.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2023

Yun-chien Chang
Yun-chien Chang
Affiliation:
Cornell Law School, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Property Law
Comparative, Empirical, and Economic Analyses
 , pp. 380 - 414
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adal, Erhan. 2012. Fundamentals of Turkish Private Law. 10th ed. Istanbul: Legal Yaymcihk San. ve Tic. Ltd. St.Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew D., and Posner, Eric A.. 2006. New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, Linzhi. 2013. Property Law of Macau. Macao SAR, China: Social Sciences Academic Press (China) [Written in Chinese].Google Scholar
Akkermans, Bram. 2008. The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law. Antwerp: Intersentia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkermans, Bram. 2017. The Numerus Clausus of Property Rights. In Comparative Property Law: Global Perspectives 100–120, edited by Graziadei, Michele and Smith, Lionel. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Alessandri, Arturo, and Somarriva, Manuel. 1974. Curso de Derecho Civil. 3rd ed. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Nascimento.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 2008. The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law. Cornell Law Review 94:745–819.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 2016. The Sporting Life: Democratic Culture and the Historical Origins of the Scottish Right to Roam. University of Illinois Law Review 2016:321–370.Google Scholar
Allen, Douglas W. 2000. Transaction Costs. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume I. The History and Methodology of Law and Economics 893–926, edited by Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee, and Mueller, Bernardo. 2015. Towards a More Evolutionary Theory of Property Rights. Iowa Law Review 100:2255–2273.Google Scholar
Alterini, Ignacio Ezequiel. 2018. Law of Property. In Introduction to the Law of Argentina 197–215, edited by Basset, Ursula. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Anderson, Siwan. 2018. Legal Origin and Female HIV. American Economic Review 108 (6):1407–1439.Google Scholar
Ansay, Tugrul. 2020. Law of Property. In Introduction to Turkish Law, edited by Ansay, Tugrul, Wallace, Don Jr. and Önay, Işık. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Aristi, Rafael Sánchez, and Imbernón, Nieves Moralejo. 2013. Property and Trust Law in Spain. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Armour, John, Deakin, Simon, Lele, Priya, and Siems, Mathias. 2009. How Do Legal Rules Evolve? Evidence from Cross-National Comparison of Shareholder, Creditor and Worker Protection. American Journal of Comparative Law 57:579–630.Google Scholar
Arruñada, Benito. 2012. Institutional Foundation of Impersonal Exchange: Theory and Policy of Contractual Registries. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, Benito. 2017. Property as Sequential Exchange: The Forgotten Limits of Private Contract. Journal of Institutional Economics 13 (4):753–783.Google Scholar
Arruñada, Benito, and Garoupa, Nuno. 2005. The Choice of Titling System in Land. Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2):709–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, Benito, Zanarone, Giorgio, and Garoupa, Nuno. 2019. Property Rights in Sequential Exchange. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 35 (1):127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, Benito, Fabbri, Marco, and Faure, Michael G.. 2022. Land Titling and Litigation. Journal of Law & Economics 65 (1):131–156.Google Scholar
Avraham, Ronen. 2004. Modular Liability Rules. International Review of Law and Economics 24 (3):269–297.Google Scholar
Aynès, Laurent. 2008. Property Law. In Introduction to French Law 147–170, edited by Bermann, George A. and Picard, Etienne. Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian. 1998. Protecting Property with Puts. Valparaiso University Law Review 32 (3):793–832.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian. 2005. Optional Law: The Structure of Legal Entitlements. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian. 2006. Menus Matter. The University of Chicago Law Review 73:3–15.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian. 2011. Regulating Opt-Out: An Economic Theory of Altering Rules. Yale Law Journal 121:2032–2116.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Balkin, J. M.. 1996. Legal Entitlements as Auctions: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Beyond. Yale Law Journal 106:703–750.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Gertner, Robert. 1989. Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules. Yale Law Journal 99:87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Gertner, Robert. 1999. Majoritarian vs. Minoritarian Defaults. Stanford Law Review 51:1591–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Goldbart, Paul M.. 2001. Optimal Delegation and Decoupling in the Design of Liability Rules. Michigan Law Review 100:1–79.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Madison, Kristin. 1999. Threatening Inefficient Performance of Injunctions and Contracts. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (1):45–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Talley, Eric. 1995. Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade. Yale Law Journal 104:1027–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Matthew, Miceli, Thomas J., Sirmans, C. F., and Turnbull, Geoffrey K.. 2002. Optimal Title Search. The Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1):139–158.Google Scholar
Bakibinga, David Justin. 2018. Property and Trust Law in Uganda. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Balganesh, Shyam, Sichelman, Ted, and Smith, Henry E., eds. 2022. Wesley Hohfeld a Century Later: Edited Work, Select Personal Papers, and Original Commentaries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balganesh, Shyamkrishna. 2016. Copyright and Good Faith Purchasers. California Law Review 104:269–322.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, Oren, and Bebchuk, Lucian Arye. 2010. Consent and Exchange. The Journal of Legal Studies 39 (2):375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Gill, Oren, and Persico, Nicola. 2016. Exchange Efficiency with Weak Ownership Rights. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8 (4):230–267.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, Oren, and Persico, Nicola. 2019. Bounded Rationality and the Theory of Property. Notre Dame Law Review 94 (3):1019–1057.Google Scholar
Barua, Mariana. 2018. Property and Trust Law in Uruguay. Alphen aan den Rijn the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Barzel, Yoram. 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baucells, Manel, and Lippmant, Steven A.. 2001. Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Analysis of Hold-Up in Co-Ownership. Cardozo Law Review 22:1191–1250.Google Scholar
Baxter, William F., and Altree, Lillian R.. 1972. Legal Aspects of Airport Noise. Journal of Law & Economics 15:1–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye. 2001. Property Rights and Liability Rules: The Ex Ante View of the Cathedral. Michigan Law Review 100:601–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Abraham. 2009. Private Takings. University of Chicago Law Review 76:517–585.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham. 2015. Title in the Shadow of Possession. In Law and Economics of Possession 320–335, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2002. Pliability Rules. Michigan Law Review 101:1–79.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2005. A Theory of Property. Cornell Law Review 90:531–615.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2007. Taking Compensation Private. Stanford Law Review 59:871–906.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2012a. The Case for Imperfect Enforcement of Property Rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review:1927–1954.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2012b. The Privacy Interest in Property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 167:869–920.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2014. Governing Communities by Auction. The University of Chicago Law Review 81:1–26.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2017. Partial Takings. Columbia Law Review 117:2043–2093.Google Scholar
Bell, George Joseph, and Guthrie, William. 1899. Principles of the Law of Scotland 10th ed. Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark (available on Hein Online).Google Scholar
Belli, Melvin M. 1959. Japanese Law. Hastings Law Journal 11:130–149.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, Omri. 1997. Property Rights in Stolen Goods: An Economic Analysis. working paper (on file with author).Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, Omri, and Bernstein, Lisa. 2000. The Secrecy Interest in Contract Law. The Yale Law Journal 109 (8):1885–1925.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, Omri, and Porat, Ariel. 2016. Personalizing Negligence Law. New York University Law Review 91:627–688.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, Omri, and Porat, Ariel. 2021. Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Daniel, Pistor, Katharina, and Richard, Jean-Francois. 2003a. Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect. European Economic Review 47 (1):165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Daniel, Pistor, Katharina, and Richard, Jean-Francois. 2003b. The Transplant Effect. American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (1):163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, Lawrence, and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. 1984. Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis. California Law Review 72 (4):569–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, Lawrence, Rubinfeld, Daniel L., and Shapiro, Perry. 1984. The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (1):71–92.Google Scholar
Bradbrook, A. J. 1983. Access to Landlocked Land: A Comparative Study of Legal Solutions. Sydney Law Review 10 (1):39–75.Google Scholar
Bradford, Anu, Chang, Yun-chien, Chilton, Adam, and Garoupa, Nuno. 2021. Do Legal Origins Predict Legal Substance? The Journal of Law and Economics 64 (2):207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Anu, and Chilton, Adam. 2018. Competition Law around the World from 1889 to 2010: The Competition Law Index. Journal of Competition Law & Economics 14 (3):393–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Anu, and Chilton, Adam. 2019. Trade Openness and Antitrust Law. Journal of Law and Economics 62 (1):29–65.Google Scholar
Bradford, Anu, Chilton, Adam, Linos, Katerina, and Weaver, Alex. 2019a. The Global Dominance of European Competition Law Over American Antitrust Law. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 16 (4):731–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Anu, Chilton, Adam S., Megaw, Chris, and Sokol, Nathaniel. 2019b. Competition Law Gone Global: Introducing the Comparative Competition Law and Enforcement Datasets. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 16 (2):411–443.Google Scholar
Brady, Maureen E. 2018. The Forgotten History of Metes and Bounds. Yale Law Journal 128:872–953.Google Scholar
Brandsma, Frits. 2015. Actions in Roman and Civil Law for the Protection of Immovables. In Protection of Immovables in European Legal Systems 9–30, edited by Santisteban, Sonia Martin and Sparkes, Peter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, Michael, Gullifer, Louise, Low, Kevin F. K., and Gerard, McMeel. 2018. The Law of Personal Property. 2nd ed. London, UK: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W. 2002. The Relative Burden of Determining Property Rules and Liability Rules: Broken Elevators in the Cathedral. Northwestern University Law Review 97:267–317.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., Landeo, Claudia M., and Spier, Kathryn E.. 2010. Trigger Happy or Gun Shy? Dissolving Common‐Value Partnerships with Texas Shootouts. The RAND Journal of Economics 41 (4):649–673.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., and Schwartz, Warren F.. 2005. Legal Uncertainty, Economic Efficiency, and the Preliminary Injunction Doctrine. Stanford Law Review 58:381–410.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., and Rose, Carol. 2013. Saving the Neighborhood: Racially Restrictive Covenants, Law, and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, David. 2017. Co-Ownership. In New Zealand Land Law 503–570, edited by Toomey, Elizabeth. Wellington, New Zealand: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Bruce, Jon W., and Ely, James W., Jr. 2011. The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land. New York, NY: West.Google Scholar
Brzozowski, Adam. 2005. Property. In Introduction to Polish Law 54–69, edited by Frankowski, Stanislaw. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1965. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, William, Maggs, Peter B., and Danilenko, Gennady M.. 2009. Law and Legal System in the Russian Federation. 4th ed. Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing.Google Scholar
Bustillos, Espíndola, and Ángel, Miguel. 2009. La Propiedad Inmobiliaria en México: Su Esencia Y Extensión. Revista Mexicana de Derecho 11:91–172.Google Scholar
Butler, William E., ed. 1999. Turkmenistan Civil Code of Saparmurat Turkmenbashi. London, UK: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Butler, William E., ed. 2000. Civil Code of the Republic Belarus. London, UK: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Butler, William E., ed. 2002. Civil Code of the Russian Federation Parts One, Two, and Three: Edited, Compiled, and Translated from the Russian, with an Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, William E., ed. 2007. Civil Code of the Republic Uzbekistan. London, UK: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Butler, William E., ed. 2008. Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. London, UK: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Butler, William E., ed. 2011. Civil Code of Ukraine and Law of Ukraine on Private International Law. London, UK: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Douglas Melamed, A.. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85:1089–1128.Google Scholar
Carbonara, Emanuela, Guerra, Alice, and Parisi, Francesco. 2016. Sharing Residual Liability: The Cheapest Cost Avoider Revisited. The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (1):173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casagrande, John G. 1985. Acquiring Property through Forced Partitioning Sales: Abuses and Remedies. Boston College Law Review 27:755–784.Google Scholar
Casey, Anthony J., and Niblett, Anthony. 2016. The Death of Rules and Standards. Indiana Law Journal 92:1401–1448.Google Scholar
Casner, A. James, and Barton Leac, W.. 1950. Cases and Text on Property. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Cauffman, Caroline, and Sagaert, Vincent. 2011. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Belgium. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 4: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal 189–351, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chambers, Robert. 2013. An Introduction to Property Law in Australia. 3rd ed. Sydney, Australia: Lawbook.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2010. An Empirical Study of Compensation Paid in Eminent Domain Settlements: New York City 1990–2002. Journal of Legal Studies 39:201–244.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2011. An Empirical Study of Court-Adjudicated Takings Compensation in New York City: 1990–2003. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (2):384–412.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2012a. Economic Value or Fair Market Value: What Form of Takings Compensation Is Efficient? Supreme Court Economic Review 20:35–88.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2012b. Property Law with Chinese Characteristics: An Economic and Comparative Analysis. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 1:345–372.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2012c. Self-Assessment of Takings Compensation: An Empirical Study. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 28:265–285.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2012d. Tenancy in “Anticommons”? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Co-ownership. Journal of Legal Analysis 4:515–553.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2013. Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2014. To Tear Down or Not to Tear Down? An Empirical Study of Boundary Encroachment Cases in Taiwan. In Empirical Legal Analysis: Assessing the Performance of Legal Institutions 144–158, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2015a. An Economic and Comparative Analysis of Specificatio (the Accession Doctrine). European Journal of Law and Economics 39 (2):225–243.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2015b. The Economy of Concept and Possession. In Law and Economics of Possession 103–125, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2015c. Optional Law in Property: Theoretical Critiques. NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 9 (2):459–512.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2016a. The Evolution of Property Law in Taiwan: An Unconventional Interest Group Story. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Economic and Legal Analyses 212–244, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shen, Wei and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2016b. Hybrid Rule: Hidden Entitlement Protection Rule in Access to Landlocked Land Doctrine. Tulane Law Review 88:217–257.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2016c. The Problematic Concept of Possession in DCFR: Lessons from Law and Economics of Possession. European Journal of Property Law 5 (1):4–25.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2017. Eminent Domain Law in Taiwan: New Law, Old Practice? In Eminent Domain: A Comparative Perspective 93–117, edited by Kim, Iljoong, Lee, Hojun and Somin, Ilya. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2018a. Incorporated Organizations and Unincorporated Organizations according to the Theory of Asset Partitioning: A Missing Piece in General Provisions of Civil Code in China. Peking University Law Journal 30 (1):59–83 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2018b. Wealth Transfer Laws in 153 Jurisdictions: An Empirical Comparative Law Approach. Iowa Law Review 102 (5):1915–1944.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2020a. The Good-Faith Purchase Doctrine in 247 Jurisdictions. European Property Law Journal 9 (2–3):133–156.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2020b. Interpreting Private Law: A Social Scientific Approach. Taipei, Taiwan: New Sharing [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2020c. Judges Avoid Ex Post but Not Ex Ante Inefficiency: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Taiwan. In Selection and Decision in Judicial Process around the World: Empirical Inquires 160–178, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2020d. The Property Structure of Rural Cultivated Land in China: Rethinking Membership Right and Tripartite Property Right. Nanjing University Law Journal 1 (1):81–100 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2021. Economic Analysis of Law: Methodology with Applications to Property Law. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2022a. Adverse Possession Laws in 203 Jurisdictions: Proposals for Reform. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 43 (2):373–428.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2022b. Empirical Legal Studies: Principles, Methods, and Applications. 2nd ed. Taipei, Taiwan: New Sharing [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2022c. Property Rights: (Probabilistically) Necessary or Sufficient for Economic Development in China and Beyond? Law & Social Inquiry 47 (2):727–733.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2023 forthcoming-a. An Empirical Comparative Analysis of Co-ownership Law. Renmin University Law Review [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2023 forthcoming-b. Property and Comparative Empirical Legal Studies. In Research Agenda in Property Law, edited by Akkermans, Bram. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Chen, Kong-pin, and Liu, Yu-sheng. 2016. The Unlawful Possession of Land and Unjust Enrichment Equivalent to Rent: Empirical Analysis and Policy Suggestions. Chengchi Law Review (144):81–153 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Chen, Weitseng, and Chieh Wu, Ying. 2022. Property and Trust Law in Taiwan. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Anne Fennell, Lee. 2014a. Appendices to Partition and Revelation. The University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue 81 (1):1–13.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Anne Fennell, Lee. 2014b. Partition and Revelation. The University of Chicago Law Review 81 (1):27–51.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Garoupa, Nuno, and Wells, Martin T.. 2021. Drawing the Legal Family Tree: An Empirical Comparative Study of 170 Dimensions of Property Law in 129 Jurisdictions. Journal of Legal Analysis 13 (1):231–282.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Hubbard, William H. J.. 2021. New Empirical Tests for Classic Litigation Selection Models: Evidence from a Low Settlement Environment. American Law and Economics Review 23 (2):348–394.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Hung, David Ta-wei, Lin, Chang-ching, and Wang, Joseph Tao-yi. 2019. Emotional Bargaining After Litigation: An Experimental Study of the Coase Theorem. Working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3340930.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Klerman, Daniel. 2022. Settlement Around the World: Settlement Rates in the Largest Economies. Journal of Legal Analysis 14:80–175.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Lin, Chang-ching. 2021. Do Parties Negotiate after Trespass Litigation? An Empirical Study of Coasean Bargaining. Working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2805063.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2012. An Economic Analysis of Civil versus Common Law Property. Notre Dame Law Review 88 (1):1–55.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2015. The Numerus Clausus Principle, Property Custom, and the Emergence of New Property Forms. Iowa Law Review 100:2275–2308.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2016. Structure and Style in Comparative Property Law. In Research Handbook on Comparative Law and Economics 131–160, edited by Eisenberg, Theodore and Ramello, Giovanni B.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2019. Convergence and Divergence in Systems of Property Law: Theoretical and Empirical Analyses. Southern California Law Review 92 (4):785–808.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Xu, Ke. 2018. Decentralized and Anomalous Interpretation of Chinese Private Law: Understanding a Bureaucratic and Political Judicial System. Minnesota Law Review 102 (4):1527–1562.Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven N. S. 1998. The Transaction Costs Paradigm. Economic Inquiry 36:514–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Dominic Y. J. 2016. In Search of a Legal Solution for Boundary Encroachments in Hong Kong: Adverse Possession vs Statutory Encroachment. Hong Kong Journal of Legal Studies 10:59–82.Google Scholar
Chilton, Adam, and Versteeg, Mila. 2020. How Constitutional Rights Matter. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric. 2011. Exclusion and Exclusivity in Gridlock. Arizona Law Review 53:9–49.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law & Economics 3:1–69.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H., and Wang, Ning. 2012. How China Became Capitalist. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cohet, Frédérique. 2019. Chapitre 1 – Accession: Mode D’acquisition de la Propriété. In Répertoire de Droit Immobilier, https://jurisguide.univ-paris1.fr/fiches-documentaires/encyclopedie-juridique-dalloz/. Paris, France: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, and Ulen, Thomas. 2012. Law and Economics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson/Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Craig-Taylor, Phyliss. 2000. Through A Colored Looking Glass: A View of Judicial Partition, Family Land Loss and Rule Setting. Washington University Law Quarterly 78:737–788.Google Scholar
Cramton, Peter, Gibbons, Robert, and Klemperer, Paul. 1987. Dissolving a Partnership Efficiently. Econometrica 55 (3):615–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Heller, Michael A.. 2001. The Liberal Commons. Yale Law Journal 110:549–623.Google Scholar
Dana, David, and Merrill, Thomas W.. 2002. Property: Takings. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Dannemann, Gerhard, and Schulze, Reiner, eds. 2020. German Civil Code Volume I: Books 1–3 Article-by-Article Commentary. Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, and Guerriero, Carmine. 2015. Law and Culture: A Theory of Comparative Variation in Bona Fide Purchase Rules. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35 (3):543–574.Google Scholar
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, and Guerriero, Carmine. 2019. Divergent and Convergent at the Intersection of Property and Contract. Southern California Law Review 92 (4):809–850.Google Scholar
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, Guerriero, Carmine, and Huang, Zhenxing. 2016. The Property-Contract Balance. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 172 (1):40–64.Google Scholar
Dari‐Mattiacci, Giuseppe. 2009. Negative Liability. The Journal of Legal Studies 38 (1):21–59.Google Scholar
Gerrit, De Geest, and Van den Bergh, Roger J., eds. 2004. Comparative Law and Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
de Londras, Fiona. 2011. Principles of Irish Property Law. 2nd ed. Dublin, Ireland: Clarus Press.Google Scholar
de Soto, Hernando. 2000. The Mystery of Capital New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. Toward a Theory of Property Rights. American Economic Review 57:347–359.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 2008. From Economic Man to Economic System: Essays on Human Behavior and the Institutions of Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 2011a. The Problem of Social Cost: What Problem? A Critique of the Reasoning of A.C. Pigou and R.H. Coase. Review of Law & Economics 7:1–13.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 2011b. R.H. Coase and the Neoclassical Model of the Economic System. Journal of Law and Economics 54 (4):S7–S13.Google Scholar
Depoorter, Ben. 2010. Adverse Possession. In Property Law and Economics 183–190, edited by Bouckaert, Boudewijn. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Depoorter, Ben. 2011. Fair Trespass. Columbia Law Review 111:1090–1135.Google Scholar
Depoorter, Ben, and Rubin, Paul. 2017. Judge-Made Law and the Common Law Process. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 3: Public Law and Legal Institutions 129–142, edited by Parisi, Francesco. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deutch, Miguel. 1995. Property Law. In Introduction to the Law of Israel 81–93, edited by Shapira, Amos and DeWitt-Arar, Keren C.. Alphen aan den Rijn the Netherlands: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Kevin H. 1985. Mistaken Improvers of Real Estate. North Carolina Law Review 64 (1):37–76.Google Scholar
Dixon, Martin. 2016. Modern Land Law. 10th ed. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Djankov, Simeon, Shleifer, Andrei, McLiesh, Caralee, and Hart, Oliver. 2008. Debt Enforcement around the World. Journal of Political Economy 116 (6):1105–1149.Google Scholar
Guillén, Domínguez, and Candelaria, María. 2017. Curso de Derecho Civil III: Obligaciones. Caracas, Venezuela: Revista Venezolana de Legislación y Jurisprudencia.Google Scholar
Drobnig, Ulrich. 1974. Security Over Corporeal Movables in Germany. In Security over Corporeal Movables 181–205, edited by Sauveplanne, J. G.. Leiden, the Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Drobnig, Ulrich. 2011a. Security Rights in Movables. In Towards a European Civil Code 1025–1042, edited by Arthur, S. Hartkamp, Martijn, W. Hesselink, Ewoud, H. Hondius, Mak, Chantal and Edgar du Perron, C.. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Drobnig, Ulrich. 2011b. Transfer of Property. In Towards a European Civil Code 1003–1023, edited by Hartkamp, Arthur S., Hesselink, Martijn W., Hondius, Ewoud, Mak, C. and Perron, Edgar Du. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Druey, J. N. 2004. Law of Property. In Introduction to Swiss Law 93–106, edited by Dessemontet, F. and Ansay, T.. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Dukeminier, Jesse, Krier, James E., Alexander, Gregory S., and Schill, Michael H.. 2010. Property. 7th ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Dyson, Henry. 2003. French Property and Inheritance Law: Principles and Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1984. Foreword: The Court and the Economic System. Harvard Law Review 98:4–60.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Brendan. 2017. Butt’s Land Law. Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Battista Ramello, Giovanni, eds. 2016. Research Handbook on Comparative Law and Economics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1986. Adverse Possession and Perpetuities Law: Two Dents in the Libertarian Model of Property Rights. Washington University Law Quarterly 64:723–737.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1993. Property in Land. Yale Law Journal 102:1315–1400.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2012. The Costs of Complex Land Titles: Two Examples from China. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 1:281–344.Google Scholar
Emerich, Yaëll. 2018. Conceptualising Property Law: Integrating Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1986. Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property. Washington University Law Quarterly 64:667–722.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1993. Holdouts, Externalities, and the Single Owner: One More Salute to Ronald Coase. Journal of Law & Economics 36:553–586.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1994. On the Optimal Mix of Private and Common Property. Social Philosophy and Policy 11:17–41.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1995. Simple Rules for A Complex World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1997. A Clear View of the Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules. Yale Law Journal 106:2091–2120.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1998. Protecting Property Rights with Legal Remedies: A Common Sense Reply to Professor Ayres. Valparaiso University Law Review 32:833–853.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2011. Heller’s Gridlock Economy in Perspective: Why There Is Too Little, Not Too Much Private Property. Arizona Law Review 53 (1):51–82.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2014. The Use and Limits of Self-Valuation Systems. The University of Chicago Law Review 81:109–129.Google Scholar
Erp, Sjef van. 2002. A Comparative Analysis of Mortgage Law: Searching for Principles. In Land Law in Comparative Perspective, edited by Elena, Maria Jordan, Sanchez and Gambaro, Antonio. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Erp, Sjef van. 2006. Comparative Property Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 1031–1057, edited by Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erp, Sjef van, and Akkermans, Bram. 2010. Property Rights: A Comparative View. In Property Law and Economics 31–52, edited by Bouckaert, Boudewijn. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Erp, Sjef van, and Akkermans, Bram. 2012. Cases, Materials and Text on Property Law. Oxford, UK: Hart.Google Scholar
Faber, Wolfgang. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Austria. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 1: Austria, Estonia, Italy, Slovenia 1–218, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Faerstad, Jan-Ove, and Lilja, Martin. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Norway and Denmark. In National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 5: Sweden, Norway and Denmark, Finland, Spain 207–301, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fambrough, Judon. 2010. Easements in Texas: Real Estate Center, Texas A & M University.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Ward. 1999. Do Parties to Nuisance Cases Bargain after Judgment? A Glimpse Inside the Cathedral. The University of Chicago Law Review 66 (2):373–436.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Ward. 2016. The Empirical Accuracy and Judicial Use of the Coase Theorem (vel non). In The Elgar Companion to Ronald H. Coase 346–357, edited by Menard, Claude and Bertrand, Elodie. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Farran, Sue. 2013. Property and Trust Law in South Pacific. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Faust, Florian. 2008. Comparative Law and Economic Analysis of Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 837–865, edited by Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2004a. Common Interest Tragedies. Northwestern University Law Review 98:907–990.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2004b. Taking Eminent Domain Apart. Michigan State Law Review 2004:957–1004.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2005. Revealing Options. Harvard Law Review 118 (5):1399–1488.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2006. Efficient Trespass: The Case for “Bad Faith” Adverse Possession. Northwestern University Law Review 100:1037–1096.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2007. Property and Half-Torts. Yale Law Journal 116:1400–1471.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2009. The Unbounded Home: Property Values Beyond Property Lines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2011a. Commons, Anticommons, Semicommons. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law 35–56, edited by Smith, Henry E.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2011b. Ostrom’s Law: Property Rights in the Commons. International Journal of the Commons 5 (1):9–27.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2011c. Property and Precaution. Journal of Tort Law 4 (2):art.3:1–63.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2012. Lumpy Property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:1955–1993.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2013a. Just Enough. Columbia Law Review Sidebar 113:109–122.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2013b. The Problem of Resource Access. Harvard Law Review 126 (6):1471–1531.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2014. Forcings. Columbia Law Review 114:1297–1372.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2016. Fee Simple Obsolete. New York University Law Review 91 (6):1457–1516.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2019a. Property Attachments. The University of Chicago Law Review 87 (1):55–66.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2019b. Slices and Lumps: Division and Aggregation in Law and Life. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Feys, Bert. 2006. A General Introduction to Norwegian Property Law. www.scribd.com/document/82917000/Norwegian-Property-Law.Google Scholar
Field, Erica. 2004. Property Rights, Community Public Goods, and Household Time Allocation in Urban Squatter Communities: Evidence from Peru. William & Mary Law Review 45:837–887.Google Scholar
Fieseler, Karsten, Kittsteiner, Thomas, and Moldovanu, Benny. 2003. Partnerships, Lemons, and Efficient Trade. Journal of Economic Theory 113 (2):223–234.Google Scholar
Foëx, Bénédict, and Marchand, Sylvain. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Switzerland. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6: The Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Lavtia 167–253, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frisby, Sandra, and Jones, Michael. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in England and Wales. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 2: England and Wales, Ireland, Scotland, Cyprus 1–154, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gaier, Reinhard. 2013. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. 6th ed. Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Galea, Patrick J. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Malta. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6: The Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Lavtia 461–544, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gambaro, Antonio, and Mattei, Ugo. 2002. Property Law. In Introduction to Italian Law 283–316, edited by Jeffrey, S. Lena and Mattei, Ugo. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Caterina. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Ireland. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 2: England and Wales, Ireland, Scotland, Cyprus 155–296, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno, and Gómez Ligüerre, Carlos. 2011. The Syndrome of the Efficiency of the Common Law. Boston University International Law Journal 29:287–335.Google Scholar
Garrido, Pedro. 2010. National Report on the Real Property in Spain. In Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. Florence, Italy: European University Institute, www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/Law/ResearchTeaching/ResearchThemes/EuropeanPrivateLaw/RealPropertyProject/Spain.pdf.Google Scholar
Gaynanova, Irena, Booth, James. G., and Wells, Martin T.. 2016. Simultaneous Sparse Estimation of Canonical Vectors in the p>>N Setting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (514):696–706.Google Scholar
Gignoux, Stéphane. 2015. Appréhender le droit marocain de l’immobilier: une approche transversale « droit privé – droit public ». www.umifre.fr/sites/default/files/cjb_ee_30.pdf: Les Études et Essais du Centre Jacques-Berque.Google Scholar
Gocza, Eva. 2013. Polgari Torvenykonyv – Civil Code Budapest, Hungary: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gold, Andrew S., Goldberg, John C. P., Kelly, Daniel B., Sherwin, Emily, and Smith, Henry E.. 2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law xv–xxviii, edited by Gold, Andrew S., Goldberg, John C. P., Kelly, Daniel B., Sherwin, Emily and Smith, Henry E. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, Lincoln D. 2010. Who Owns the (Aircraft) Engine(s)? The Doctrine of Accession Explained. http://lincolngomez.com/2010/02/11/aviation-engines-doctrine-accession-gomez-bikker-arub/.Google Scholar
González, Espinosa, and Javier, Jacinto. 2015. Los Derechos Reales en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Panameño. Vol. 1. Panama City, Panama: Universidad de Panamá.Google Scholar
Goo, Say, and Lee, Alice. 2019. Land Law in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, China: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Gordley, James. 2006. Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graziadei, Michele. 2017. The Structure of Property Ownership and the Common Law/Civil Law Divide. In Comparative Property Law: Global Perspectives 71–99, edited by Graziadei, Michele and Smith, Lionel. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Greco, Alessio. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Italy. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 1: Austria, Estonia, Italy, Slovenia 341–506, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Aryeh. 2010. Israel’s Real Estate and Movable Property Laws: Completely Revised and Updated English Translations, Incorporating All Amendments Legislated Until November 1, 2010. Translated by Aryeh Greenfield. 6th ed. Haifa, Israel: A.G. Publications.Google Scholar
Gretton, George L., Steven, Andres J. M., and Struthers, Alison E. C.. 2017. Property, Trusts and Succession. 3rd ed. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Stefan, Micklitz, Hans-W., and Renner, Moritz. 2021. New Private Law Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Güth, Werner, Schmittberger, Rolf, and Schwarze, Bernd. 1982. An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4):367–388.Google Scholar
Guerriero, Carmine. 2016. Endogenous Property Rights. Journal of Law and Economics 59:313–358.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Jerg, Hayo, Bernd, and Voigt, Stefan. 2014. Determinants of Constitutionally Safeguarded Judicial Review: Insights Based on a New Indicator. In Empirical Legal Analysis: Assessing the Performance of Legal Institutions 216–254, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Jerg, Metelska-Szaniawska, Katarzyna, and Voigt, Stefan. 2022. The Comparative Constitutional Compliance Database. www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Feconpapers.repec.org%2FRePEc%3Azbw%3Ailewps%3A57&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw3KMIYP9Mqtbx_6MnIiQ35Q.Google Scholar
Habdas, Magdalena. 2018. Property and Trust Law in Poland. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier. 2000a. The End of History for Corporate Law. Georgia Law Journal 89:439–468.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier. 2000b. The Essential Role of Organizational Law. Yale Law Journal 110:387–440.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier. 2002. Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights. Journal of Legal Studies 31:S373–S420.Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162:1243–1248.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L., and McAdams, Richard H.. 1997. The Surprisingly Complex Case against Theft. International Review of Law & Economics 3 (17):367–378.Google Scholar
Hashem, Hisham R. 1990. The Jordan Civil Code of Moslem Jurisprudence. Amman, Jordan: al-Tawfiq Printing Press.Google Scholar
Haug, Karoline Rakneberg. 2017. The Historical Development of the Scandinavian Functional Approach to Transfer of Ownership: A Tale of Change and Continuity. European Property Law Journal 6 (2):236–271.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Ashton, Rothman, Richard A., and Goldstein, David B.. 1995. A Tale of Two Innocents: Creating an Equitable Balance between the Rights of Former Owners and Good Faith Purchasers of Stolen Art. Fordham Law Review 64:49–96.Google Scholar
Hayton, David, and Matthews, Paul. 2007. Property and Trust Law in England and Wales. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hegdal, Stein. 2015. Norwegen. In Handbuch Immobilienrecht in Europa : Zivil- und Steuerrechtliche Aspekte des Erwerbs, der Veräusserung und der Vererbung von Immobilien 901–973, edited by Frank, Susanne and Wachter, Thomas. Munich, Germany: C.F. Müller.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. 1998. The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review 111 (3):621–688.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. 2008. The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael, and Salzman, James. 2021. Mine!: How the Hidden Rules of Ownership Control Our Lives. New York, NY: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Helmholz, Richard H. 1983. Adverse Possession and Subjective Intent. Washington University Law Quarterly 61:331–358.Google Scholar
Hennig, Christian. 2007. Cluster-Wise Assessment of Cluster Stability. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 52 (1):258–271.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Samantha J. 2002. Property and Trust Law in Australia. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Michael V. 2005. Restating Implied, Prescriptive, and Statutory Easements. Real Property Probate and Trust Journal 40:75–115.Google Scholar
HNZPT. 2019. Guidelines for the Finding of Artefacts. www.heritage.org.nz/~/-/media/b283ec5075024ca39c158a088a80af69.ashx: Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga.Google Scholar
Ho, Han-wei, Huang, Patrick Chung-Chia, and Chang, Yun-chien. 2023 forthcoming. Machine-Learning Methods. In Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, edited by Siems, Mathias and Yap, Po Jen. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Lusina, and Lee, Rebecca, eds. 2013. Trust Law in Asian Civil Law Jurisdictions: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofri-Winogradow, Adam. 2020. The Statutory Liberalization of Trust Law across 152 Jurisdictions: Leaders, Laggards and the Market in Fiduciary Services. U.C. Davis Law Review 53:2313–2355.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1913. Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. The Yale Law Journal 23:16–59.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1917. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. The Yale Law Journal 26 (8):710–770.Google Scholar
Holderness, Clifford G. 2003. Joint Ownership and Alienability. International Review of Law and Economics 23:75–100.Google Scholar
Holguín, Juan Larrea. 2010. Derecho Civil Del Ecuador, Vol. V: Los Bienes Y La Posesión. Quito, Ecuador: Corporación de Estudios Y Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Hollo, Erkki J. 2012. Property and Trust Law in Finland. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hollo, Erkki J. 2019. Property and Trust Law in Finland. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Holmström, Bengt, and Myerson, Roger B.. 1983. Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information. Econometrica 51 (6):1799–1819.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, Kurtz, Sheldon F., and Gallanis, Thomas P.. 2016. Principles of Property Law. 7th ed. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.Google Scholar
Huffstetler, Scott D. 2002. Don’t Fence Me In: Louisiana’s Fourth Circuit Expands “Voluntariness” Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 693. Louisiana Law Review 63:111–126.Google Scholar
Hylton, Keith N. 2006. Property Rules and Liability Rules, Once Again. Review of Law & Economics 2 (2):1–55.Google Scholar
Hylton, Keith N. 2011. Property Rules and Defensive Conduct in Tort Law Theory. Journal of Tort Law 4 (1):1–31.Google Scholar
Israel Law Resource Center. 2007. Laws of the State of Israel: Authorized Translation from the Hebrew. Vol. 12. Jerusalem, Israel: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Izuel, Leeanna. 1992. Property Owners’ Constructive Possession of Treasure Trove: Rethinking the Finders Keepers Rule. UCLA Law Review 38:1659–1702.Google Scholar
Jansen, J. E. 2012. Thieves and Squatters: Acquisitive and Extinctive Prescription in European Property Law. European Property Law Journal 1 (1):153–165.Google Scholar
Jehiel, Philippe, and Pauzner, Ady. 2006. Partnership Dissolution with Interdependent Values. The RAND Journal of Economics 37 (1):1–22.Google Scholar
Jensen, Ulf. 2010. National Report on the Real Property in Sweden. In Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. Florence, Italy: European University Institute www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/Law/ResearchTeaching/ResearchThemes/EuropeanPrivateLaw/RealPropertyProject/Sweden.PDF.Google Scholar
Josipovic, Tatjana. 2013. Property and Trust Law in Croatia. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Josipović, Tatjana. 2014. Property Law. In Introduction to the Law of Croatia 95–131, edited by Josipović, Tatjana. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Joubert, Willem Adolf, and Faris, J. A.. 2010. The Law of South Africa, Volume 24. Durban, South Africa: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard. 1986. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. American Economic Review 76 (4):728–741.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis. 1992. Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis. Duke Law Journal 42:557–629.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis, and Shavell, Steven. 1996. Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis. Harvard Law Review 109:713–790.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis, and Shavell, Steven. 2002. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Karam, Nicolas. 2011. The Civil Code of Kuwait: Decree Law No. 67 of 1980. Translated by Karam, Nicholas. London, UK: Lexgulf Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Karibali-Tsiptsiou, Yianna. 2012. Property and Trust Law in Greece. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Katz, Larissa. 2010. The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law. McGill Law Journal 55:47–80.Google Scholar
Keesee, Allen P. K. 1982. Commercial Laws of the Middle East: Oman. London, UK: Oceana Publication.Google Scholar
Kelly, Daniel B. 2009. Pretextual Takings: Of Private Developers, Local Governments, and Impermissible Favoritism. Supreme Court Economic Review 17:173–235.Google Scholar
Kelly, Daniel B. 2011. Acquiring Land through Eminent Domain: Justifications, Limitations, and Alternatives. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law 344–371, edited by Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E.. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kelly, Daniel B. 2014. Restricting Testamentary Freedom: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications. Fordham Law Review 82:1125–1185.Google Scholar
Kenjebayeva, Aigoul. 2016. Property Law. In Introduction to the Law of Kazakhstan 109–125, edited by Kembayev, Zhenis. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeong-Yoo. 2004. Good-faith Error and Intentional Trespassing in Adverse Possession. International Review of Law and Economics 24 (1):1–13.Google Scholar
Kim, Kenise. 2010. Mixed Systems in Legal Origins Analysis. Southern California Law Review 83:693–730.Google Scholar
Klaoudatou, Christina. 2011. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Greece. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 3: Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Hungary 201–322, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klass, Alexandra B. 2006. Adverse Possession and Conservation: Expanding Traditional Notions of Use and Possession. University of Colorado Law Review 77:283–333.Google Scholar
Klauberg, Theis, and Kolomijceva, Julija. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Latvia. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6: The Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Lavtia 547–584, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyer.Google Scholar
Kleijn, W. M., Jordaans, J. P., Krans, H. B., Ploeger, H. D., and Steketee, F. A. (revised by J. M. J. Choros). 2006. Property Law. In Introduction to Dutch Law 103–134, edited by Chorus, J. M. J., Gerver, Piet-Hein and Hondius, Ewoud. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Paul. 1999. Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 13 (3):227–286.Google Scholar
Klerman, Daniel. 2015. Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Property. In Law and Economics of Possession 266–289, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klerman, Daniel M., Mahoney, Paul G., Spamann, Holger, and Weinstein, Mark I.. 2011. Legal Origin or Colonial History? Journal of Legal Analysis 3 (2):379–409.Google Scholar
Klerman, Daniel, and Shortland, Anja. 2022. The Transformation of the Art World: Law, Norms, and Institutions. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 23 (1):219–242.Google Scholar
Klick, Jonathan, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2016. The Value of the Right to Exclude: An Empirical Assessment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 165 (4):917–966.Google Scholar
Koh, Jay L. 1998. From Hoops to Hard Drives: An Accession Law Approach to the Inevitable Misappropriation of Trade Secrets. American University Law Review 48:271–358.Google Scholar
Kohler, Jürgen. 2005. Property Law (Sachenrecht). In Introduction to German Law 227–249, edited by Zekoll, Joachim and Reimann, Mathias. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Kominers, Scott D., and Weyl, Eric G.. 2011. Holdout in the Assembly of Complements: A Problem for Market Design. American Economic Review 102 (3).Google Scholar
Koo, Hui-wen. 2011. Property Rights, Land Prices, and Investment: A Study of the Taiwanese Land Registration System. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 167 (3):515–535.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. 2022. The Economic Analysis of Law. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), edited by Edward, N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-econanalysis/. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Koziol, Helmut, Bydlinski, Peter, and Bollenberger, Raimund. 2005. Kurzkommentar zum ABGB: Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch samt Ehegesetz und Konsumentenschutzgesetz. Vienna, Austria: Springer.Google Scholar
Krier, James E. 2006. Property. 17th ed. Chicago, IL: Gilbert Law Summaries.Google Scholar
Krier, James E., and Schwab, Stewart J.. 1995. Property Rules and Liability Rules: The Cathedral in Another Light. New York University Law Review 70:440–483.Google Scholar
Krier, James E., and Serkin, Christopher. 2004. Public Ruses. Michigan State Law Review 2004:859–876.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, M. 2002. Law of Adverse Possession. 13th ed. New Delhi, India: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
Kullerkupp, Kai. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Estonia. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 1: Austria, Estonia, Italy, Slovenia 226–340, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Zachary D. 2011. Cutting the Baby in Half: An Economic Critique of Indivisible Resource Partition. Brooklyn Law Review 77:263–302.Google Scholar
Kuusinen, Miki. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Finland. In National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 5: Sweden, Norway and Denmark, Finland, Spain 304–391, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kwon, Youngjoon. 2013. Civil Law and Civil Procedure Law. In Introduction to Korean Law, edited by Korea Legislation Research Institute. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Forest, La, Warner, Anne. 2017a. Law of Real Property, Volume 2. 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Forest, La, Warner, Anne. 2017b. Law of Real Property, Volume 3. 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, López-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2008. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46:285–332.Google Scholar
Landeo, Claudia M., and Spier, Kathryn E.. 2014. Irreconcilable Differences: Judicial Resolution of Business Deadlock. The University of Chicago Law Review 81:203–227.Google Scholar
Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. 1996. The Economics of Legal Disputes over the Ownership of Works of Art and Other Collectibles. In Economics of the Arts: Selected Essays 177–219, edited by Ginsburgh, Victor and Menger, Pierre-Michel. Brussels, Belgium: Universite Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Landsburg, Steven. 2008. Price Theory and Applications 7th ed. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
Langer, William. 1975. American Foods and Europe’s Population Growth. Journal of Social History 8:51–66.Google Scholar
Law, David S. 2016. Constitutional Archetypes. Texas Law Review 95:153–243.Google Scholar
Lee, Jack Tsen-Ta. 2004. Treaties, Time Limits and Treasure Trove: The Legal Protection of Cultural Objects in Singapore. Art Antiquity & Law 9:237–280.Google Scholar
Lee, Peter. 2011. The Accession Insight and Patent Infringement Remedies. Michigan Law Review 110:175–233.Google Scholar
Lee, Robert Warden. 1953. An Introduction to Roman Dutch Law. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lehavi, Amnon. 2020. The Law of Trusts and Collective Action: A New Approach to Property Deadlocks. University of Cincinnati Law Review 89:388–431.Google Scholar
Leks, Eddy M. 2018. Property and Trust Law in Indonesia. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. 1997. The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law. Texas Law Review 75:989–1084.Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl J. 2005. Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review 118:915–972.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 1982. Self-Assessed Valuation Systems for Tort and Other Law. Virginia Law Review 68 (4):771–861.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 1985. Explaining Restitution. Virginia Law Review 71:65–124.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 1987. Variety and Uniformity in the Treatment of the Good-faith Purchaser. Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1):43–65.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 2019. Convergence and Downstream Divergence in Torts and Other Laws. Southern California Law Review 92:769–783.Google Scholar
Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna. 2001. The Choice between Property Rules and Liability Rules Revisited: Critical Observations from Behavioral Studies. Texas Law Review 80:219–260.Google Scholar
Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna. 2015. What Behavioral Studies Can Teach Jurists about Possession and Vice Versa. In Law and Economics of Possession 128–148, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D., and Lueck, Dean. 2011a. The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions. Journal of Political Economy 119 (3):426–467.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D., and Lueck, Dean. 2011b. Land Demarcation Systems. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law 257–295, edited by Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D., Lueck, Dean, and O’Grady, Trevor. 2011. Large-Scale Institutional Changes: Land Demarcation in the British Empire. Journal of Law and Economics 54 (4):S295–S327.Google Scholar
Libya, Meredith O., and Ansell, Ibrahim Massaud al-Arif. 1972. The Libyan Civil Code: An English Translation and a Comparison with the Egyptian Civil Code. Cambridge, UK: Oleander Press.Google Scholar
Licht, Amir N., Goldschmidt, Chanan, and Schwartz, Shalom H.. 2005. Culture, Law, and Corporate Governance. International Review of Law and Economics 25:229–255.Google Scholar
Lilja, Martin. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Sweden. In National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 5: Sweden, Norway and Denmark, Finland, Spain 1–204, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lin, Yu-Hsin, and Chang, Yun-chien. 2018. An Empirical Study of Corporate Default Rules and Menus in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15 (4):875–915.Google Scholar
Listokin, Yair. 2009. What Do Corporate Default Rules and Menus Do? An Empirical Examination. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (2):279–308.Google Scholar
Liu, Michael. 2014. Possession in the Law of Finding: A Comparative of the Doctrine of Possession. Australian Property Law Journal 22:211–232.Google Scholar
Locke, Natania. 2008. Security Granted by a Company over Its Movable Property: The Floating Charge and the General Notarial Bond Compared. The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 41 (1):136–154.Google Scholar
Lovett, John A. 2017a. Disseisin, Doubt, and Debate: Adverse Possession Scholarship in the United States (1881–1986). Texas A&M Law Review 5:1–63.Google Scholar
Lovett, John A. 2017b. Precarious Possession. Louisiana Law Review 77:617–700.Google Scholar
Mackaay, Ejan. 2021. Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems. 2nd ed. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Maidin, Ainul Jaria Binti, and Ali, Zuraidah H. J.. 2014. Property and Trust Law in Malaysia. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Mann, Trischa, and Blunden, Audrey, eds. 2010. Australian Law Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattei, Ugo. 2000. Basic Principles of Property Law: A Comparative Legal and Economic Introduction. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Mattei, Ugo, Ruskola, Teemu, and Gidi, Antonio. 2009. Schlesinger’s Comparative Law. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Mattheou, Eugenia. 2010. Greek Report. In Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. Florence, Italy: European Law Institute.Google Scholar
Mau, Stephen D. 2010. Property Law in Hong Kong: An Introductory Guide. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Mautner, Menachem. 1991. “The Eternal Triangles of the Law”: Toward a Theory of Priorities in Conflicts Involving Remote Parties. Michigan Law Review 90 (1):95–154.Google Scholar
Maydanyk, Roman. 2017. Property and Trust Law in Ukraine. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Mayer, Christopher J. 1995. A Model of Negotiated Sales Applied to Real Estate Auctions. Journal of Urban Economics 38:1–22.Google Scholar
Mayer, Christopher J. 1998. Assessing the Performance of Real Estate Auctions. Real Estate Economics 26:41–66.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Ben. 2008. The Structure of Property Law. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Medina, Barak. 2003. Augmenting the Value of Ownership by Protecting It Only Partially: The “Market-Overt” Rule Revisited. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19 (2):343–372.Google Scholar
Meier, Luke. 2015. A Contextual Approach to Claim of Right in Adverse Possession Cases: On Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz, Bad Faith, and Mistaken Boundaries. Lewis & Clark Law Review 19:47–72.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 1985. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Adverse Possession. Northwestern University Law Review 79:1122–1154.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 1986. The Economics of Public Use. Cornell Law Review 72:61–116.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 1998. Property and the Right to Exclude. Nebraska Law Review 77:730–755.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2009. Accession and Original Ownership. Journal of Legal Analysis 1 (2):459–510.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2012a. Property as Modularity. Harvard Law Review 125:151–163.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2012b. The Property Strategy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:2061–2095.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2014. Property and the Right to Exclude II. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 3:1–25.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2015. Ownership and Possession. In Law and Economics of Possession 1–39, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2000. Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle. Yale Law Journal 110:1–70.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2001a. The Property/Contract Interface. Columbia Law Review 101:773–852.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2001b. What Happened to Property in Law and Economics. Yale Law Journal 111:357–398.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2007a. The Morality of Property. William and Mary Law Review 48:1849–1896.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2007b. Property: Principles and Policies. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2010. The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2011. Making Coasean Property More Coasean. Journal of Law and Economics 54 (4):S77–S104.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2012. Property: Principles and Policies. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2017. Property: Principles and Policies. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2020. The Architecture of Property. In Research Handbook on Private Law Theory 134–154, edited by Dagan, Hanoch and Zipursky, Benjamin C.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Merwe, C. G. Van der. 1999. The Louisiana Right to Forced Passage Compared to the South African Way of Necessity. Tulane Law Review 73:1363–1413.Google Scholar
Merwe, C. G. Van der. 2003. Interpretation of Common Law and Civil Law as Experienced in the South African and Scottish Law of Property. Tulane Law Review 78:257–290.Google Scholar
Merwe, C. G. Van der. 2004. The Law of Property. In Introduction to the Law of South Africa 201–242, edited by Merwe, C. G. Van der and Plessis, Jacques E. du. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J. 2004. The Economic Approach to Law. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Economics and Finance.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., Munneke, Henry J., Sirmans, C. F., and Turnbull, Geoffrey K.. 2002. Title Systems and Land Values. The Journal of Law and Economics 45 (2):565–582.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., and Segerson, Kathleen. 2007. The Economics of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use, and Just Compensation. Boston, MA: Now Publishers.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., and Sirmans, C. F.. 1995a. An Economic Theory of Adverse Possession. International Review of Law and Economics 15:161–173.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., and Sirmans, C. F.. 1995b. The Economics of Land Transfer and Title Insurance. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 10 (1):81–88.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., and Sirmans, C. F.. 2000. Partition of Real Estate; or, Breaking Up Is (Not) Hard to Do. Journal of Legal Studies 29:783–796.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., Sirmans, C. F., and Turnbull, Geoffrey K.. 1998. Assurance and Incentives for Efficient Land Use. European Journal of Law and Economics 6 (3):305–323.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., Sirmans, C. F., and Turnbull, Geoffrey K.. 2000. The Dynamic Effects of Land Title Systems. Journal of Urban Economics 47 (3):370–389.Google Scholar
Miceli, Thomas J., Sirmans, C. F., and Turnbull, Geoffrey K.. 2001. The Property-Contract Boundary: An Economic Analysis of Leases. American Law and Economics Review 3:165–185.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1982. Ethics, Economics, and the Law of Property. In Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics, and the Law 3–40, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mikelenas, Valentinas. 2011. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Lithuania. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 3: Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Hungary 333–408, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, David Carey, L., Combe, Malcolm M., Steven, Andrew J. M., and Wortley, Scott. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Scotland. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 2: England and Wales, Ireland, Scotland, Cyprus 311–470, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Millung-Christoffersen, Astrid. 2019. The Scandinavian “Functional” Approach to Movable Property from a Danish view: Including the Question of “Tradition.” European Property Law Journal 8 (1):4–22.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas W. 2001. From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: Undermining Black Landownership, Political Independence, and Community through Partition Sales of Tenancies in Common. Northwestern University Law Review 95:505–580.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas W. 2005. Destabilizing the Normalization of Rural Black Land Loss: A Critical Role for Legal Empiricism. Wisconsin Law Review 2005:557–616.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas W., Malpezzi, Stephen, and Green, Richard K.. 2010. Forced Sale Risk: Class, Race, and the “Double Discount.” Florida State University Law Review 37:589–658.Google Scholar
Mitra, Arindam. 2007. Mitra’s Law of Possession and Ownership of Property. New Delhi, India: Sodhi Publications.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H., and Kornhauser, Lewis. 1979. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. Yale Law Journal 88 (5):950–997.Google Scholar
Moldovanu, Benny. 2002. How to Dissolve a Partnership. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 158 (1):66–80.Google Scholar
Moore, Anthony P., Grattan, Scott, and Griggs, Lynden. 2016. Australian Property Law: Cases and Materials. 5th ed. Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Morse, Susan C. 2016. Safe Harbors, Sure Shipwrecks. UC Davis Law Review 49:1385–1430.Google Scholar
Mostert, Hanri, and Verstappen, Leon. 2015. Practical Approaches to the Numerus Clausus of Land Rights: How Legal Professionals in South Africa and the Netherlands Deal with Certainty and Flexibility in Property Law. In Modern Studies in Property Law 351–372, edited by Barr, Warren. London, UK: Hart.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. 1979. Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 47 (1):61–73.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. 2008. Perspectives on Mechanism Design in Economic Theory. American Economic Review 98 (3):586–603.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger B., and Satterthwaite, Mark A.. 1983. Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading. Journal of Economic Theory 29 (2):265–281.Google Scholar
Nasarre-Aznar, Sergio. 2012. The Need for the Integration of the Mortgage Market in Europe. In The Future of European Property Law 79–122, edited by van Erp, Sjef, Salomons, Arthur and Akkermans, Bram. Munich, Germany: Sellier European Law Publishers.Google Scholar
Negbi, Z. 1975. The Polish Civil Code. Leiden, the Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Neocleous, Andreas. 2000. Introduction to Cyprus Law. Albany, NY: Yorkhill Law.Google Scholar
Netter, Jeffry M., Hersch, Philip L., and Manson, William D.. 1986. An Economic Analysis of Adverse Possession Statutes. International Review of Law and Economics 6:217–228.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher M. 2011. Transformation in Property and Copyright. Villanova Law Review 56:251–325.Google Scholar
Niblett, Anthony. 2017. On the Efficiency of the Common Law: An Application to the Recovery of Rewards. European Journal of Law and Economics 43 (3):393–417.Google Scholar
Niblett, Anthony. 2020. How Lower Courts Respond to a Change in a Legal Rule. In Selection and Decision in Judicial Process around the World: Empirical Inquires 110–131, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niblett, Anthony, Posner, Richard A., and Shleifer, Andrei. 2010. The Evolution of a Legal Rule. The Journal of Legal Studies 39 (2):325–358.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. Note. 1906. The Japanese Civil Code. Canada Law Review 2:73–74.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 2020. Accession on the Frontiers of Property. Harvard Law Review 133:2381–2402.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Pamela. 2006. The Private Taking of Land: Adverse Possession, Encroachment by Buildings and Improvement under a Mistake. University of Western Australia Law Review 33 (1):31–62.Google Scholar
Oda, Hiroshi. 2009. Japanese Law. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen-Ring, Line, and Ring, Gerhard. 2015. Dänemark. In Handbuch Immobilienrecht in Europa : Zivil- und Steuerrechtliche Aspekte des Erwerbs, der Veräusserung und der Vererbung von Immobilien 97–178, edited by Frank, Susanne and Wachter, Thomas. Munich, Germany: C.F. Müller.Google Scholar
Ørebech, Peter. 2013. Western Scandinavia: Exit Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch – the Resurrection of Customary Laws. Texas International Law Journal 48:405–434.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oto-Peralías, Daniel, and Romero-Ávila, Diego. 2014. The Distribution of Legal Traditions around the World: A Contribution to the Legal Origins Theory. Journal of Law and Economics 57:561–628.Google Scholar
Pacanowska, Isabel González, V., and Soto, Carlos Manuel Díez. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Spain. In National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 5: Sweden, Norway and Denmark, Finland, Spain 394–667, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Palmer, Vincent Valentine. 2001. A Descriptive and Comparative Overview. In Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family 19–92, edited by Palmer, Vernon Valentine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, Gideon, and Siegelman, Peter. 2004. Selling Mayberry: Communities and Individuals in Law and Economics. California Law Review 92:75–146.Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, Gideon, Siegelman, Peter, and Thel, Steve. 2007. Of Equal Wrongs and Half Rights. New York University Law Review 82:738–789.Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, Gideon, and Stein, Alex. 2009. Reconceptualizing Trespass. Northwestern University Law Review 103:1823–1862.Google Scholar
Pargendler, Mariana. 2012a. Politics in the Origins: The Making of Corporate Law in Nineteenth-Century Brazil. The American Journal of Comparative Law 60 (3):805–850.Google Scholar
Pargendler, Mariana. 2012b. The Rise and Decline of Legal Families. American Journal of Comparative Law 60:1043–1074.Google Scholar
Parisi, Francesco. 2004. The Efficiency of the Common Law Hypothesis. In The Encyclopedia of Public Choice 519–522, edited by Rowley, Charles K. and Schneider, Friedrich. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Passinhas, Sandra. 2019. Property and Trust Law in Portugal. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Peñalver, Eduardo M. 2009. Land Virtues. Cornell Law Review 94:821–888.Google Scholar
Peñalver, Eduardo M., and Katyal, Sonia. 2007. Property Outlaws. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 155:1095–1186.Google Scholar
Peñalver, Eduardo M., and Katyal, Sonia. 2010. Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Perez, Vanessa Casado, and Gomez Liguerre, Carlos. 2019. From Nuisance to Environmental Protection in Continental Europe. South Carolina Law Review 92:1003–1030.Google Scholar
Petkov, Ivan. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Slovakia. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6: The Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Lavtia 351–449, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyer.Google Scholar
Picker, Christian, and Herrler, Sebastian. 2019. J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: Staudinger BGB – Buch 3: Sachenrecht. Berlin, Germany: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Picker, Randal C. 2009. Security Interests in Personal Property: Cases, Problems, and Materials. 4th ed. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Pilati, José Isaac. 2016. Property Law. In Introduction to Brazilian Law 73–86, edited by Deffenti, Fabiano and Barral, Welber. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Plassmann, Florenz, and Tideman, T. Nicolaus. 2011. Marginal Cost Pricing and Eminent Domain. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics 7 (1):1–110.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Mitchell A. 1980. Resolving Nuisance Disputes: The Simple Economics of Injunctive and Damage Remedies. Stanford Law Review 32:1075–1112.Google Scholar
Porat, Ariel. 2009. Private Production of Public Goods: Liability for Unrequested Benefits. Michigan Law Review 108:189–227.Google Scholar
Porat, Ariel, and Jacob Strahilevitz, Lior. 2013. Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data. Michigan Law Review 112:1417–1478.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Weyl, E. G.. 2017. Property Is Only Another Name for Monopoly. Journal of Legal Analysis 9 (1):51–123.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Weyl, E. G.. 2018. Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1983. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law. 8th ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Preston McAfee, R. 1992. Amicable Divorce: Dissolving a Partnership with Simple Mechanisms. Journal of Economic Theory 56 (2):266–293.Google Scholar
Qiao, Shitong. 2017. Chinese Small Property: The Co-Evolution of Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ralli, Tommi, and Weckström, Katja. 2010. National Report on the Real Property in Finland. In Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union 304–391. Florence, Italy: European University Institute, www.eui.eu/documents/departmentscentres/law/researchteaching/researchthemes/europeanprivatelaw/realpropertyproject/Finland.pdf.Google Scholar
Rallo, Juan Ramón. 2019. Property Is Only Another Name for Decentralized Creation of Knowledge. European Journal of Law and Economics 47 (1):43–55.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Nakazato, Minoru. 1999. Japanese Law: An Economic Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rascha, Joseph, and Dolana, Robert F.. 2021. New York Law and Practice of Real Property. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. New York, NY: WestLaw.Google Scholar
Rauterberg, Gabriel. 2020. The Essential Roles of Agency Law. Michigan Law Review 118:609–653.Google Scholar
Reboul-Maupin, Nadège. 2020. Droit des Biens. 8th ed. Paris, France: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Reid, Candace. 1986. Partitions in Kind: A Preference without Favor. Cardozo Law Review 7:855–886.Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias. 2006. Comparative Law and Economic Analysis of Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 839–867, edited by Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Sally Brown. 2015. Abandonment and Adverse Possession. Houston Law Review 52:1385–1430.Google Scholar
Ritaine, Eleanor Cashin. 2011. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in France. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 4: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal 1–188, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rivers, Faith. 2007. Inequality in Equity: The Tragedy of Tenancy in Common for Heirs’ Property Owners Facing Partition in Equity. Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review 17:1–81.Google Scholar
Rizzolli, Matteo. 2009. Building Encroachments. Review of Law and Economics 5:661–693.Google Scholar
RomañachJr., Julio. 2003. Federal Civil Code of Mexico Translated into English: With an Introduction and Index. Baton Rouge, LA: Lawrence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
RomañachJr., Julio. 2009. Civil Code of Panama 2009: Translated into English with an Introduction and Index. Baton Rouge, LA: Lawrence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
RomañachJr., Julio. 2014a. Civil Code of Costa Rica and Family Code of Costa Rica Translated into English: With an Introduction and Index. Baton Rouge, LA: Lawrence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
RomañachJr., Julio. 2014b. Civil Code of Peru Translated into English: With an Introduction and Index. Baton Rouge, LA: Lawrence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
RomañachJr., Julio. 2015a. Civil and Commercial Code of Argentina Translated into English: With an Introduction and Index. Baton Rouge, LA: Lawrence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
RomañachJr., Julio. 2015b. Civil Code of Brazil Translated into English: With an Introduction, Index and Glossary of Selected Brazilian Civil Law Terms. 3rd ed. Baton Rouge, LA: Lawrence Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ronovská, Katerina, Dobrovolná, Eva, Havel, Bohumil, and Pihera, Vlastimil. 2020. Property and Trust Law in the Czech Republic. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1988. Crystals and Mud in Property Law. Stanford Law Review 40:577–610.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1997. The Shadow of the Cathedral. Yale Law Journal 106:2175–2200.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1998. The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystem. Minnesota Law Review 83:129–182.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 2000. Property and Expropriation: Themes and Variations in American Law. Utah Law Review 2000:1–38.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 2011. Servitudes. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law 296–325, edited by Ayotte, Kenneth and Henry, E. Smith. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ross, Alf. 1957. Tû-Tû. Harvard Law Review 70:812–825.Google Scholar
Roth, Herbert. 2017. J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: Staudinger BGB – Buch 3: Sachenrecht. Berlin, Germany: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Rudolf, Claudia, Rijavec, Vesna, and Keresteš, Tomaž. 2009. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Slovenia. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 1: Austria, Estonia, Italy, Slovenia 514–638, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rupesinghe, Pubudini Wickramaratne, and Rupesinghe, Nuwan. 2007. An Introduction to Housing and Land Laws in Sri Lanka. Geneva, Switzerland: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.Google Scholar
Rustichini, Aldo, Satterthwaite, Mark A., and Williams, Steven R.. 1994. Convergence to Efficiency in a Simple Market with Incomplete Information. Econometrica 62 (5):1041–1063.Google Scholar
Sagaert, Vincent. 2011. Harmonization of Security Rights on Immoveables: An Ongoing Story. In Towards a European Civil Code 1043–1063, edited by Hartkamp, Arthur S., Hesselink, Martijn W., Hondius, Ewoud H., Mak, Chantal and Perron, C. Edgar du. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sagaert, Vincent. 2017. Property Law. In Introduction to Belgian Law 205–226, edited by Kruithof, Marc and Bondt, Walter De. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Salomons, Arthur F. 2009. On the Economics of Good Faith Acquisition Protection in the DCFR. In The Politics of the Draft Common Frame of Reference 199–216, edited by Somma, Alessandro. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Salomons, Arthur F. 2011. Good Faith Acquisition of Movables. In Towards a European Civil Code 1065–1082, edited by Hartkamp, Arthur S., Hesselink, Martijn W., Hondius, Ewoud H., Mak, Chantal and Perron, C. Edgar du. The Hague, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Salomons, Arthur F. 2013. The Purpose and Coherence of the Rules on Good Faith Acquisition and Acquisitive Prescription in the Draft Common Frame of Reference: A Tale of Two Gatekeepers. European Review of Private Law 21 (3):843–862.Google Scholar
Salomons, Arthur, and Haentjens, Matthias. 2017. Property and Trust Law in the Netherlands. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sandor, Istvan. 2017. Property and Trust Law in Hungary. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Santisteban, Sonia Martin, and Sparkes, Peter, eds. 2015. Protection of Immovables in European Legal Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaeferdiek, Sascha. 2015. Schweden. In Handbuch Immobilienrecht in Europa: Zivil- und Steuerrechtliche Aspekte des Erwerbs, der Veräusserung und der Vererbung von Immobilien 1275–1314, edited by Frank, Susanne and Wachter, Thomas. Munich, Germany: C.F. Müller.Google Scholar
Schmid, Christoph U., and Hertel, Christian. 2005. Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. Würzburg, Germany: European University Institute Florence.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Hans-Bernd. 2019. Rules versus Standards in Developing Countries: The Case for Clear and Precise Legal Norms on Eminent Domain Power. Law and Development Review 12 (2):425–455.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Hans-Bernd, and Ott, Claus. 2004. The Economic Analysis of Civil Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Hans-Bernd, and Ott, Claus. 2022. The Economic Analysis of Civil Law. 2nd ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Allan, and Scott, Robert E.. 2011. Rethinking the Laws of Good Faith Purchase. Columbia Law Review 111:1332–1384.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1999. A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work. Applied Psychology: An International Review 48 (1):23–47.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Warren F. 1989. Objective and Subjective Standards of Negligence: Defining the Reasonable Person to Induce Optimal Care and Optimal Populations of Injurers and Victims. Georgia Law Journal 78:241–279.Google Scholar
Schweizer, Urs. 2006. Universal Possibility and Impossibility Results. Games and Economic Behavior 57 (1):73–85.Google Scholar
See, Alvin, Yip, Man, and Goh, Yihan. 2018. Property and Trust Law in Singapore. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sentell, C. Sherburne, III. 1994. Fixing the Right of Passage from an Enclosed Estate: Deciding Where to Break out Using Louisiana Civil Code Article 692. Louisiana Law Review 54:1659–1684.Google Scholar
Serkin, Christopher. 2013. The Law of Property. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Setten, Gerrit J. van. 2015. Finnland. In Handbuch Immobilienrecht in Europa : Zivil- und Steuerrechtliche Aspekte des Erwerbs, der Veräusserung und der Vererbung von Immobilien 265–301, edited by Frank, Susanne and Wachter, Thomas. Munich, Germany: C.F. Müller.Google Scholar
Shaelou, Stéphanie Laulhé, Stylianou, Stelia, and Anastasiou, Karolina. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Cyprus. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 2: England and Wales, Ireland, Scotland, Cyprus 471–608, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shahabi, Mostafa. 2007. The Civil Code of Iran. London, UK: Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Shavell, Steven. 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Duncan. 2011. The Principles of Personal Property Law. Oxford, UK: Hart.Google Scholar
Simón-Moreno, Héctor. 2012. The Eurohypothec: A Perspective from Spanish Law. European Property Law Journal 1 (2):191–231.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. 2010. Property. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Singh, Avtar, and Kaur, Harpreet. 2020. Textbook on the Transfer of Property Act. 6th ed. Delhi, India: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Sitkoff, Robert H., and Schanzenbach, Max M.. 2005. Jurisdictional Competition for Trust Funds: An Empirical Analysis of Perpetuities and Taxes. Yale Law Journal 115:356–437.Google Scholar
Škerl, Jerca Kramberger, and Vlahek, Ana. 2010. Property and Trust Law in Slovenia. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Škerl, Jerca Kramberger, and Vlahek, Ana. 2020. Property and Trust Law in Slovenia. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smaliukas, Andrius. 2017. Property and Trust Law in Lithuania. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2000. Semicommon Property Rights and Scattering in the Open Fields. Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1):131–169.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2002. Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights. Journal of Legal Studies 31:S453–S487.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2003. The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience. Stanford Law Review 55:1105–1191.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2004a. Exclusion and Property Rules in the Law of Nuisance. Virginia Law Review 90 (4):965–1049.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2004b. Property and Property Rules. New York University Law Review 79:1719–1798.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2005. Governing the Tele-Semicommons. Yale Journal on Regulation 22:289–314.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2006. Modularity in Contracts: Boilerplate and Information Flow. Michigan Law Review 104:1175–1222.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2007. Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information. Yale Law Journal 116:1742–1822.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2008. Governing Water: The Semicommons of Fluid Property Rights. Arizona Law Review 50:445–478.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2009a. Institutions and Indirectness in Intellectual Property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157:2083–2133.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2009b. Law and Economics: Realism or Democracy? Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 32:127–145.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2011a. Modularity and Morality in the Law of Torts. Journal of Tort Law 4:1–32.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2011b. Standardization in Property Law. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law 148–173, edited by Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2012a. On the Economy of Concepts in Property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:2097–2128.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2012b. Property as the Law of Things. Harvard Law Review 125:1691–1726.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2013a. Why Fiduciary Law Is Equitable. In Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 261–284, edited by Gold, Andrew S. and Miller, Paul B.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2015. The Persistence of System in Property Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163:2055–2084.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2017. Property as Complex Interaction. Journal of Institutional Economics 13 (4):809–814.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2019. Complexity and the Cathedral: Making Law and Economics More Calabresian. European Journal of Law and Economics 48 (1):43–63.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2020. Systems Theory: Emergent Private Law. In The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law 143–158, edited by Gold, Andrew S., Goldberg, John C. P., Kelly, Daniel B., Sherwin, Emily and Smith, Henry E.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2021a. Equity as Meta-Law. Yale Law Journal 130:1050–1144.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2021b. Property beyond Flatland. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal 10:9–56.Google Scholar
Smith, Imran Oluwole. 2018. Property and Trust Law in Nigeria. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smith, Lionel. 2013b. Chapter 5: Security. In English Private Law 307–377, edited by Burrows, Andrew. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger. 2009a. The Antidirector Rights Index Revisited. Review of Financial Studies 23:467–486.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger. 2009b. Contemporary Legal Transplants: Legal Families and the Diffusion of (Corporate) Law. BYU Law Review 2009 (6):1813–1877.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger. 2009c. Large-sample, Quantitative Research Designs for Comparative Law? American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (4):797–810.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger. 2015. Empirical Comparative Law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 11:131–153.Google Scholar
Sparkes, Peter. 2019. Property and Trust Law in England and Wales. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sprankling, John G. 1994. An Environmental Critique of Adverse Possession. Cornell Law Review 79:816–884.Google Scholar
Stöcker, Otmar. 2012. The Eurohypothec. In The Future of European Property Law 65–78, edited by Erp, Sjef van, Salomons, Arthur and Akkermans, Bram. Munich, Germany: Sellier European Law Publishers.Google Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey Evans. 2001. The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession. Georgetown Law Journal 89:2419–2474.Google Scholar
Stanescu, Catalin Gabriel. 2017. Property and Trust Law in Romania. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Steiner, Eva. 2010. French Law: A Comparative Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stenseth, Geir. 2019. The Importance of the Social Function of Property – Norway. In Léon Duguit and the Social Obligation Norm of Property: A Translation and Global Exploration 123–142, edited by Viven-Wilksch, Jessica and Babie, Paul T.. Singapore: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Sterk, Stewart E. 1987. Neighbors in American Land Law. Columbia Law Review 87:55–104.Google Scholar
Sterk, Stewart E. 2008. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Uncertainty about Property Rights. Michigan Law Review 106:1286–1336.Google Scholar
Sterk, Stewart E. 2012. Strict Liability and Negligence in Property Theory. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:2129–2156.Google Scholar
Stoebuck, William B., and Whitman, Dale A.. 2000. The Law of Property. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
Stoimenov, Dimitar. 2011. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Bulgaria. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 4: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland, Portugal, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Strickler, Yves. 2006. Les Biens. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2018. The Cost-Benefit Revolution. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Synodinou, Tatiana Eleni. 2020. Property and Trust Law in Cyprus. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, Ferenc. 2011. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Hungary. In National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 3: Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Hungary 429–701, edited by Faber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Técnica, Ministerio de Justicia – Secretaría General. 2009. Spanish Civil Code. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Justicia.Google Scholar
Taliadoros, Constantine. 1982. Greek Civil Code. Athens, Greece: Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers.Google Scholar
Tang, Hang Wu. 2018. From Waqf, Ancestor Worship to the Rise of the Global Trust: A History of the Use of the Trust as a Vehicle for Wealth Transfer in Singapore. Iowa Law Review 103 (5):2263–2292.Google Scholar
Tang, Hang Wu, and Low, Kevin F. K.. 2019. Tan Sook Yee’s Principles of Singapore Land Law. 4th ed. Singapore: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Terré, François, and Philippe, Simler. 2006. Droit Civil: Les Biens. 7th ed. Paris, France: Dalloz-Sirey.Google Scholar
Terré, François, and Philippe, Simler. 2010. Droit Civil: Les Biens. 8th ed. Paris, France: Dalloz-Sirey.Google Scholar
Terré, François, and Simler, Philippe. 2006. Droit Civil: Les Biens. 7th ed. Paris, France: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Tichy, Lubos. 2010. National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Czech. In National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6: The Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Latvia 262–347, edited by Farber, Wolfgang and Lurger, Brigitta. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tideman, T. Nicolaus, and Tullock, Gordon. 1976. A New and Superior Process for Making Social Choices. Journal of Political Economy 84:1145–1159.Google Scholar
UN-HABITAT. 2005. Housing and Property Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovinam Croatia and Serbia and Montenegro. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.Google Scholar
Underkuffler, Laura. 2011. Open, Notorious, and Continuously Occupied: A Claim for Adverse Possession. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy On-line http://jlpp.org/blogzine/open-notorious-and-continuously-occupied-a-claim-for-adverse-possession/.Google Scholar
Unknown. 1969. Pledges Law, 1967. Israel Law Review 4:443–448.Google Scholar
Unknown. 1970. Land Law, 5729–1969. Israel Law Review 5 (2):292–326.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K. 2013. What Are Property Rights Good For? Surprising Lessons from the Chinese Experience. In Rethinking Law and Development: The Chinese Experience 82–103, edited by Yu, Guanghua. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K. 2018. The Great Property Fallacy: Theory, Reality, and Growth in Developing Countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vékás, Lajos. 1995. Law of Property and Law of Succession. In Introduction to Hungarian Law 81–93, edited by Harmathy, Attila. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, C. G., Waal, Marius Johannes de, and Miller, David L. Carey. 2002. Property and Trust Law in South Africa. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, Cornelius, ed. 2015. European Condominium Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Vliet, Lars 2017. Transfer of Property Inter Vivos. In Comparative Property Law: Global Perspectives 150–170, edited by Graziadei, Michele and Smith, Lionel. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Varadarajan, Deepa. 2014. Improvement Doctrines. George Mason Law Review 21:657–716.Google Scholar
Vickrey, William. 1961. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance 16 (1):8–37.Google Scholar
von Bar, Christian, ed. 1999. Sachenrecht in Europa: Systematische Einführungen und Gesetzestexte. 1. Dänemark, England, Finnland, Schweden. Osnabrück, Germany: Universitätsverlag Rasch.Google Scholar
von Bar, Christian, and Drobnig, Ulrich. 2004. The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe: A Comparative Study. Munich, Germany: Sellier European Law Publishers.Google Scholar
Waldeck, Sarah E. 2011. Rethinking the Intersection of Inheritance and the Law of Tenancy in Common. Notre Dame Law Review 87:737–780.Google Scholar
White, James J., and Summers, Robert S.. 2007. Principles of Secured Transactions. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Willenzik, David S. 2015. Louisiana Future Advance Mortgages: A 20-Year Retrospective. Louisiana Law Review 75:613–695.Google Scholar
Williams, Gordon. 2011. Property and Trust Law in New Zealand. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Wilmore, Randall L. 1986. Right of Passage for the Benefit of an Enclosed Estate. Louisiana Law Review 47:199–216.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert. 1985. Incentive Efficiency of Double Auctions. Econometrica 53 (5):1101–1115.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Clark. 1974. Rezoning by Auction – A New Approach to Land Use Decisions. Utah Science 35:86–89.Google Scholar
Wolf, Michael Allan, ed. 2021. Powell on Real Property. Vol. 7. Newark, NJ: Matthew Bender & Company.Google Scholar
Woods, Una. 2011. Property and Trust Law in Ireland. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Woods, Una. 2016. Adverse Possession and Boundary Disputes: Lessons for Ireland from Abroad. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment 8:56–79.Google Scholar
Wyman, Katrina M. 2017. The New Essentialism in Property. Journal of Legal Analysis 9 (2):183–246.Google Scholar
Wyman, Katrina M. 2019. Property in Radical Markets. The University of Chicago Law Review 87 (1):125–137.Google Scholar
Xu, Guodong. 2007. Codification of Civil Codes in Comparative Perspective [比较法视野中的民法典编纂]. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Yee, Tan Sook, and Tjio, Hans. 2000. Property and Trust Law in Singapore. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Yiannopoulos, A. N. 1996. The Legal Servitude of Passage. Tulane Law Review 71:1–44.Google Scholar
Yiannopoulos, Athanassios N. 2008. Property. In Introduction to Greek Law 153–166, edited by Kerameus, Konstantinos D. and Kozyris, Phaedon J.. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Zamir, Eyal, and Teichman, Doron. 2018. Behavioral Law and Economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Richard O. 2001. Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Zhang, Taisu. 2017. The Laws and Economics of Confucianism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ziadeh, Farhat J. 1979. Property Law in the Arab World: Real Rights in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. London, UK: Graham & Trotman.Google Scholar
Ziff, Bruce. 2014. Principles of Property Law. 6th ed. Toronto, Canada: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard, Reid, Kenneth, and Visser, Daniel. 2005. Co-ownership. In Mixed Legal Systems in Comparative Perspective: Property and Obligations in Scotland and South Africa 704–733, edited by Zimmermann, Reinhard, Reid, Kenneth and Visser, Daniel. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Živković, Miloš. 2007. Country Report Serbia. www.ius.bg.ac.rs/prof/materijali/xivmil/vdpCountryReportSerbiaF30092007.pdf.Google Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad, and Kötz, Hein. 1998. Introduction to Comparative Law. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zywicki, Todd J., and Stringham, Edward Peter. 2013. Common Law and Economic Efficiency. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, edited by Parisi, Francesco and Richard, A. Posner. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×