Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:05:25.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Case Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2021

Edited by
Thomas Cottier
Edited in association with
Zaker Ahmad
Thomas Cottier
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute
Zaker Ahmad
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Prospects of Common Concern of Humankind in International Law , pp. 93 - 428
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Abdel-Latif, A. (2015). ‘Intellectual Property Rights and the Transfer of Climate Technologies: Issues, Challenges and Way Forward’, Climate Policy 15(1) pp. 103–26.Google Scholar
Atik, J. (2017). ‘Technology Transfer’, in Cottier, Thomas et al. (eds.), Elgar Encyclopedia of International Economic Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), pp. 606–9.Google Scholar
Boldt, J., Nygaard, I., Hansen, Ulrich E., and Trærup, S. (2012). Overcoming Barriers to the Transfer and Diffusion of Climate Technologies (2nd ed., UNEP Risø Centre).Google Scholar
Brandi, C. (2017). Trade Elements in Countries’ Climate Contributions under the Paris Agreement (Geneva: ICTSD), www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/trade_ elements_in_countries _climate_contributions.pdf (accessed 19 Sept. 2019).Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2014). ‘Green Subsidies and the WTO’, World Bank policy research working paper, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/10/20290817/green-subsidies-wto (accessed 19 Sept. 2019).Google Scholar
Coppens, D. (2014). WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T., Nartova, O., and Bigdeli, S. Z. (eds.) (2009). International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change: World Trade Forum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 1007–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T., Nartova, O., and Shingal, A. (2014). ‘The Potential of Tariff Policy for Climate Change Mitigation’, Legal and Economic Analysis, Journal of World Trade 48.Google Scholar
Cramton, P. C., MacKay, D. J. C., and Ockenfels, A. (eds.) (2017). Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
de Coninck, H. and Sagar, A. (2017). ‘Technology Development and Transfer (Article 10)’, in Klein, Daniel et al. (eds.), The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 258–76.Google Scholar
de Coninck, H. et al. (2018). ‘Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response’, in Masson-Delmotte, Valerie et al. (eds.), Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C (Geneva: World Meteorological Organization), pp. 313–443.Google Scholar
Gallagher, K. S. (2014). The Globalization of Clean Energy Technology: Lessons from China (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, K. (2014). Carbon-Related Border Adjustment and WTO Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, S. (2012). ‘Structural Ambiguity: Technology Transfer in Three Regimes’, in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 175–98.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2011). ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’, Perspectives on Politics 9 pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (2016). ‘The Interface between the Trade Rules and Climate Change Actions’, in Park, Deok-Young (ed.), Legal Issues on Climate Change and International Trade Law (Berlin: Springer), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Ockwell, D. and Mallett, A. (eds.) (2012). Low-Carbon Technology Transfer: From Rhetoric to Reality (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trærup, S., Greersen, L., and Kundsen, C. (2018) Mapping Barriers and Enabling Environments in Technology Needs Assessments, Nationally Determined Contributions, and Technical Assistance of the Climate Technology Centre and Network, background paper TEC/2018/17/4, https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/164669703/Barriers_and_Enablers_to _tt_25Sept.pdf (accessed 16 Sept. 2019).Google Scholar
UNEP, EPO, and ICTSD (2010). Patents and Clean Energy: Bridging the Gap between Evidence and Policy (Geneva: UNEP, EPO, ICTSD).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Andrady, A. L. (ed.) (2003). Plastics and the Environment (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience).Google Scholar
Arroyo, Schnell A. et al. (2017). ‘National Marine Plastic Litter Policies in EU Member States: An Overview’ (IUCN).Google Scholar
Bergmann, M., Gutow, L. and Klages, M. (2015). Marine Anthropogenic Litter (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
Boucher, J. and Friot, D. (2017). ‘Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: A Global Evaluation of Sources’ (IUCN).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBD Secretariat, (2016). ‘Marine Debris: Understanding, Preventing and Mitigating the Significant Adverse Impacts on Marine and Coastal Biodiversity’ (New York: McGraw-Hill Education) CBD Technical Series No. 83.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. (2015). Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sadeleer, N. (2002). Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Earle, S. A. (2010). The World Is Blue: How Our Fate and the Ocean’s Are One (Washington, DC: National Geographic).Google Scholar
Eriksen, M. et al. (2014). ‘Plastic Pollution in the World’s Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea’, 9 PLoS ONE e111913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. and Law, K. L. (2017). ‘Production, Use, and Fate of All Plastics Ever Made’, 3 Science Advances e1700782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jambeck, J. R. et al. (2015). ‘Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean’ (2015) 347 Science 768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebreton, L. et al. (2018). ‘Evidence That the Great Pacific Garbage Patch Is Rapidly Accumulating Plastic’ (2018) 8 Scientific Reports www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w (accessed 20 Sept. 2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIlgorm, A., Campbell, H. F. and Rule, M. J. (2011). ‘The Economic Cost and Control of Marine Debris Damage in the Asia-Pacific Region’, 54 Ocean & Coastal Management 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, B. K. (2005). ‘Trade Measures and the Environment: Can the WTO and UNCLOS Be Reconciled?’, 23 UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 37.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2003). Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochman, C. M. (2016). ‘The Ecological Impacts of Marine Debris: Unraveling the Demonstrated Evidence from What Is Perceived’, 97 Ecology 302.Google Scholar
UNEP (2016). ‘Marine Plastic Debris and Microplastics: Global Lessons and Research to Inspire Action and Guide Policy Change’ (UNEA-2 Technical Report on Marine Plastic Debris).Google Scholar
UNEP (2018). ‘Combating Marine Plastic Litter and Microplastics: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Relevant International, Regional and Subregional Governance Strategies and Approaches – Summary for Policy Makers’, UNEP/AHEG/2018/1/INF/3.Google Scholar
Vranes, E. (2009). Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Select Bibliography

Alvaredo, F. et al. (eds.). (2018). World Inequality Report 2018 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What Can Be Done? (London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, S. (2004). ‘Sovereignty in Conflict’, European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 8(15), 1–23.Google Scholar
Buhaug, H., Cederman, L. E. and Gleditsch, K. S. (2014). ‘Square Pegs in Round Holes: Inequalities, Grievances and Civil War’, International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 418–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, L. E., Weidmann, N. B. and Bormann, N. C. (2015). ‘Triangulating Horizontal Inequality: Toward Improved Conflict Analysis’, Journal of Peace Research, 52(6), 806–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, L. E., Weidmann, N. B. and Gleditsch, K. S. (2011). ‘Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison’, American Political Science Review, 105(3), 478–95.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. (1956). ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (London: Vintage).Google Scholar
Lowe, A. V. (1985). ‘The Problems of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Economic Sovereignty and the Search for a Solution’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 34(4), 724–46.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. V. (2008). ‘Sovereignty and International Economic Law’, in Shan, W., Simons, P. and Singh, D. (eds.), Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law (Portland: Hart), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
Perrez, F. X. (2000). Cooperative Sovereignty: From Independence to Interdependence in the Structure of International Environmental Law (Kluwer: The Hague).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarooshi, D. (2004). ‘The Essentially Contested Nature of the Concept of Sovereignty: Implications for the Exercise by International Organizations of Delegated Powers of Government’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 1107–39.Google Scholar
Sarooshi, D. (2005). International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Stewart, F. (2000). ‘Crisis Prevention: Tackling Horizontal Inequalities’, Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. (ed.). (2008). Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Thurow, L. C. (1971). ‘The Income Distribution as a Pure Public Good’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(2), 327–36.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, C. D. (2013). A Contemporary Concept of Monetary Sovereignty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Delanis, A., J. (1979). ‘“Force” under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter: The Question of Economic and Political Coercion’, 12 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 103–14Google Scholar
Adlung, R. (2015). ‘Export Policies and the General Agreement on Trade in Services’, 18 Journal of International Economic Law 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (2010). Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods (paperback ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (2001). ‘Human Rights as a Common Concern’, 95 American Political Science Review 269–82.Google Scholar
Besson, S. (2015). ‘The Bearers of Human Rights’ Duties and Responsibilities for Human Rights: A Quite (R)evolution?’, 32 Social Philosophy and Policy 244–68.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2012). ‘What’s in a Concept? Global Public Goods, International Law, and Legitimacy’, 23 European Journal of International Law/Journal européen de droit international 651–68.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (1998). ‘The Moral Exception in Trade Policy’, 38 Virginia Journal of International Law 689–745.Google Scholar
Chilton, A. S. and Posner, E. A. (2016). ‘Respect for Human Rights: Law and History’, Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics No. 770 1–22.Google Scholar
Cleveland, S. H. (2002). ‘Human Rights Sanctions and International Trade: A Theory of Compatibility’, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 133–189.Google Scholar
Schefer, K. N. and Cottier, T. (2014). ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and the Emerging Principle of Common Concern’, in Hilpold, P. (ed.), The Responsibility to Protect (R2P): A New Paradigm of International Law? (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff), pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, M. (2017). Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Elagab, O. Y. (1988). The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Genser, J. and Cotler, I. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect: The Promise of Stopping Mass Atrocities in Our Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hofer, A. (2017). ‘The Developed/Developing Divide on Unilateral Coercive Measures: Legitimate Enforcement or Illegitimate Intervention?’ 16 Chinese Journal of International Law 175–214.Google Scholar
Paulus, A. (2012 ). ‘‘Whether Universal Values Can Prevail over Bilateralism and Reciprocity’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Portela, C. (2018). ‘Targeted Sanctions against Individuals on Grounds of Grave Human Rights Violations – Impact, Trends and Prospects at EU Level’ 1–35.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A. (2014). The Twilight of Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ruys, T. (2017). ‘Sanctions, Retorsions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework’ Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), pp. 19–51.Google Scholar
Ruys, T. (2019). ‘Immunity, Inviolability and Countermeasures – A Closer Look at Non-UN Targeted Sanctions’, in Ruys, Tom and Angelet, Nicolas (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 670–710.Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A. (2015). ‘The Right to be Free from Economic Coercion’ 4 Cambridge International Law Journal 616–33.Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Clemens, M. A. (2017). ‘Migration Is a Form of Development: The Need for Innovation to Regulate Migration for Mutual Benefit’, UN Population Division, Technical Paper No. 2017/8 (New York: United Nations).Google Scholar
Cottier, T. and Shingal, A. (2021). ‘Migration Trade and Investment: Towards a New Common Concern of Humankind’, Journal of World Trade, 55 pp. 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. and Sieber-Gasser, C. (2015). ‘Labour Migration, Trade and Investment: From Fragmentation to Coherence’, in Panizzon, M., Zürcher, G. and Fonalé, L. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of International Labour Migration, Law and Policy Perspectives (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 41–60.Google Scholar
de Haas, H. (2010). ‘Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective’, International Migration Review 44(1) 227–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollifield, J. (2004). ‘The Emerging Migration State’, International Migration Review, 38(3) 885–912.Google Scholar
Jennifer, G. (2010). ‘People Are Not Bananas: How Immigration Differs from Trade’, Northwestern University Law Review 104(3) 1109.Google Scholar
Losada, R. M. (2013). ‘Strengthening the Migration–Development Nexus through Improved Policy and Institutional Coherence’, Opinion Notes, 58–60, www.oecd.org/dev/migration-development/2013%2012%2010%20opinion%20notes%20-%20with%20cover.pdf (accessed 30 Sept. 2019).Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1996). ‘The Anatomy of a Migration Hump’, in Taylor, J. E. E. (ed.), Development Strategy, Employment, and Migration: Insights from Models (Paris: OECD Development Centre), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2004). The Challenge of Population and Migration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Martin, S. (2000). ‘Toward a Global Migration Regime’, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 1(2) 119–27.Google Scholar
Martin, S. (2014). International Migration: Evolving Trends from the Early Twentieth Century to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 270–5.Google Scholar
Nadakavukaren Schefer, K. and Cottier, T. (2014). ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and the Emerging Principle of Common Concern’, in Hilpold, Peter (ed.), Responsibility to Protect (R2P): A New Paradigm of International Law? (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff), pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Rittener, O., Losada, R. M., Perriard, L. and Toscano, S. (2011). ‘Swiss Migration Partnerships: A Paradigm Shift’, in Kunz, R., Lavenex, S. and Panizzon, M. (eds.), Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership (New York: Routledge), pp. 249–64.Google Scholar
Skeldon, R. (2008). ‘Migration and Development’, United Nations Expert Group Meeting on International Migration and Development in Asia and the Pacific, UN/POP/EGM-MIG/2008/4, 9 Sept. 2008, www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/expert/14/P04_Skeldon.pdf (accessed 30 Sept. 2019).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Bummer, C. (2011). Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camdessus, M. ‘International Financial and Monetary Stability: A Global Public Good?’, www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/28/04/53/sp052899.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. (2011). ‘Towards a Five Storey House’, in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E. U. (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law (Oxford: Hart).Google Scholar
Cottier, T., Aerni, P., Karapinar, B., Matteotti, S., de Sépibus, J. and Shingal, A. (2014). ‘The Principle of Common Concern and Climate Change’, Archiv des Völkerrechts (AVR), 52.Google Scholar
Cottier, T., Jackson, J. H. and Lastra, R. M. (eds.) (2010). International Law in Financial Regulation and Monetary Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cottier, T., Lastra, R. M., Tietje, C. and Satragno, L. (eds.) (2014). The Rule of Law in Monetary Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dorrucci, E. and McKay, J. (2011). ‘The International Monetary System after the Financial Crisis’, ECB Occasional Paper Series No. 123.Google Scholar
Gianviti, F. (2001). ‘Evolving Role and Challenges for the International Monetary Fund’, International Lawyer, 35(4).Google Scholar
Giovanoli, M. and Devos, D. (eds.) (2010). International Monetary and Financial Law: The Global Crisis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
IMF, Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/.Google Scholar
IMF, (2010). The Fund’s Mandate: The Legal Framework, www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2010/022210.pdf.Google Scholar
IMF, (2016). Strengthening the International Monetary System: A Stocktaking, www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2016/022216b.pdf.Google Scholar
Lastra, R. M. (1996). Central Banking and Banking Regulation (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).Google Scholar
Lastra, R. M. (2015). International Financial and Monetary Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Palais-Royal Initiative (2011). Reform of the International Monetary System: A Cooperative Approach for the Twenty First Century, http://global-currencies.org/smi/gb/telechar/news/Rapport_Camdessus-integral.pdf.Google Scholar
Mohan, R. and Kapur, M. (2014). ‘Monetary Policy Coordination and the Role of Central Banks’, IMF Working Paper 14/70, www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1470.pdf.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. (2012). Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Steil, B. (2014). The Battle of Bretton Woods: John Maynard Keynes, Harry Dexter White, and the Making of a New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Viterbo, A. (2012). International Economic Law and Monetary Measures (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, C. D. (2013). A Contemporary Concept of Monetary Sovereignty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Abdelal, R. (2007). Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Boccuzzi, G., (2016). The European Banking Union: Supervision and Resolution (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Brummer, C. (2012). Soft Law and the Global Financial System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Caprio, G., Evanoff, D., and Kauffman, G. G. (eds.) (2006) Cross-Border Banking: Regulatory Challenges (Singapore: World Scientific).Google Scholar
Cottier, T., Jackson, J. H., and Lastra, R. M., (eds.) (2012). International Law in Financial Regulation and Monetary Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Desai, P. (2003). Financial Crisis, Contagion, and Containment: From Asia to Argentina (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, D. W. (2005). ‘Globalization, Harmonization, and Competition: The Different Pathways to Policy Convergence’, 12 Journal of European Public Policy 841.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (2008). Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System (2nd ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Goodhart, C. and Lastra, R. M. (2010). ‘Border Problems’, 13 Journal of International Economic Law, 705.Google Scholar
Hüpkes, E. (2010). ‘Rivalry in Resolution: How to Reconcile Local Responsibilities and Global Interests?’, 7 European Company and Financial Law Review 216.Google Scholar
IMF (2010). ‘Understanding Financial Interconnectedness’ (IMF, 4 Oct.).Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. and Aliber, R. Z. (2005). Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (rev. ed., London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Lupo-Pasini, F. (2017). The Logic of Financial Nationalism: The Challenges of International Cooperation and the Role of International Law (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lupo-Pasini, F. (2017). ‘Financial Stability in International Law’, 18 Melbourne Journal of International Law 45.Google Scholar
Schoenmaker, D. (2013). Governance of International Banking: The Financial Trilemma (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schwarcz, S. (2008). ‘Systemic Risk’, 97 Georgetown Law Journal 193.Google Scholar
Singer, A. (2007). Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the Global Financial System (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Wyplosz, C. (1999). ‘International Financial Instability’, in Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., and Stern, M. A. (eds.), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 152–89.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Case Studies
  • Edited by Thomas Cottier
  • Edited in association with Zaker Ahmad
  • Book: The Prospects of Common Concern of Humankind in International Law
  • Online publication: 04 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878739.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Case Studies
  • Edited by Thomas Cottier
  • Edited in association with Zaker Ahmad
  • Book: The Prospects of Common Concern of Humankind in International Law
  • Online publication: 04 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878739.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Case Studies
  • Edited by Thomas Cottier
  • Edited in association with Zaker Ahmad
  • Book: The Prospects of Common Concern of Humankind in International Law
  • Online publication: 04 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878739.004
Available formats
×