Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T03:05:20.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The TRIPS Agreement and the patent protection of genetic resources

from Part II - The protection of genetic resources in intellectual property law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Jonathan Curci
Jonathan Curci
Affiliation:
Touro International University, Rome
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the international and regional law obligations related to the patenting of life forms. The creation and the evolution of the international patent system has led to Article 27 in the TRIPS Agreement, thus internationalizing the practice of patenting life forms.

Because the matter of the protection of biodiversity and TK in the IP system is strictly connected with the interests of developing countries, particular attention should be paid to some development-oriented principles of the TRIPS Agreement.

The following sections offer some interpretative paths that the judge, the policy maker, and the legal scholar can use to apply the relevant TRIPS provisions to any particular case at hand. The objective is to explain some interpretative principles of the substantive TRIPS provisions that may help to achieve a fine-tuned balance between right-holders and users with regards to patent rights mandated by Article 27 of TRIPS. The achievement of this balance is central to the relationship between GR and TK provider countries (generally developing) and recipient countries (generally industrialized).

The general principles of the TRIPS Agreement

The TRIPS Agreement has the potential to contextualize IP law within the realm of general public international law, given its progressive universal adoption. The whole WTO-GATT legal architecture is based upon the intention of the international community to create a broader constitutional basis to regulate international trade.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Protection of Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge in International Law of Intellectual Property , pp. 29 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stewart, T. (ed.), The GATT Uruguay Round. A Negotiating History (1986–1992) (Kluwer, The Hague, 1993)
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development (Cambridge University Press, 2005) 118CrossRef
Ricolfi, M., “Is there an Antitrust Antidote against IP Overprotection within TRIPS?” (2006) 10(2) Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review331–32Google Scholar
Melander, G., “Article 27”, in Asbjorn, Eideet al. (eds.), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Commentary (Scandinavian University Press, Oslo and Oxford University Press, 1992) 429–32, 431Google Scholar
Curci, J. and Vittori, M., “Improving Access to Life-Saving Patented Drugs – Between Compulsory Licensing and Differential Pricing” (2004) 7 The Journal of World Intellectual Property739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, C., Intellectual Property Rights and Use of Compulsory Licenses: Options for Developing Countries (Southcentre, Geneva, 1999)Google Scholar
Odman, N. A., “Using TRIPS to Make the Innovation Process Work” (2000) 3 Journal of World Intellectual Property343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R., “The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel: A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times” (2000) 4 The Journal of World Intellectual Property493, 502Google Scholar
Gervais, D., The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1998) 64Google Scholar
Sinclair, I., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 139 (2nd edn, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1984)Google Scholar
Chazournes, L. Boisson de, “Qu'est-ce que la pratique en droit international?”, La pratique et le droit international, Colloque de Genève de la Société française pour le droit international (Paris, Pedone 2004) 43Google Scholar
Marceau, G., “A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against ‘Clinical Isolation’ in WTO Dispute Settlement” (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade87, 112Google Scholar
Cottier, T. and Biber-Klemm, S. (eds.), Rights to Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge: Basic Issues and Perspectives (CABI on behalf of Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the World Trade Institute, London, 2006) 130–33Google Scholar
Schapira, R., “Biotechnology Patents in the United States” in Sterckx, S. (ed.), Biotechnology, Patents and Morality (Aldershot, England, Burlington, VT, 1997) 171–72Google Scholar
Gallochat, A., “Le brevet et l'éthique, ou le mélange des genres” (1993) 2 Dossiers brevets18Google Scholar
Spada, P., “Liceità dell'invenzione brevettabile ed esorcismo dell'innovazione” (2000) 5 (1) Rivista di diritto privato5Google Scholar
Murphy, S. D., “Biotechnology and International Law” (2001) 41(1) Harvard International Law Journal47Google Scholar
Dutfield, G., “Sharing the Benefits of Biodiversity: Is There a Role for the Patent System?” (2002) 5Journal of World Intellectual Property899Google Scholar
Golden, J., “Biotechnology, Technology Policy, and Patentability: Natural Products and Invention in the American System” (2001) 50 Emory Law Journal101Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G., ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1987) 207 Le Recueil de cours de l'Académie de Droit International189–90 (1987)Google Scholar
Sammartano, M. Rubino, International Arbitration Law and Practice (Kluwer, The Hague, 2001) 457–58Google Scholar
Castillo, G. T., “Whose Ethics and which Equity?: Issues in the Conservation and Use of Genetic Resources for Sustainable Food Security”, in International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (ed.), Ethics and Equity in Conservation and Use of Genetic Resources for Sustainable Food Security, Proceedings of a workshop to develop guidelines for the CGIAR (Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 1997) 19–31Google Scholar
Abbott, F., Cottier, T. and Gurry, F. (eds.), The Intellectual Property System: Commentary and Materials (Kluwer, The Hague, 1999) Part I, 25
Mazzoleni, R. and Nelson, R. R., “Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents” (1998) 32 Journal of Economic Issues1033 and 1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, T., The Economics of the International Patent System (The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1951) 32Google Scholar
Torremans, P. and Holyoak, J., Intellectual Property Law (Oxford University Press, 2006) 17, 20Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., “The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors”, in Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, (Princeton University Press, National Bureau Economic Research, Princeton, New Jersey, 1962) 609Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×