Book contents
- Providence and Narrative in the Theology of John Chrysostom
- Providence and Narrative in the Theology of John Chrysostom
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Stories of Suffering and Providence
- 2 Divine and Human Activity in Biblical Narrative
- 3 Narrative Clusters, Providential Habits, and Typological Exegesis
- 4 Proofs of Providence and God’s Philanthropic Character
- 5 True Judgements and Consolation
- 6 The Virtue of Yielding to Providence
- 7 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Scriptural Index
- Subject Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
Book contents
- Providence and Narrative in the Theology of John Chrysostom
- Providence and Narrative in the Theology of John Chrysostom
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Stories of Suffering and Providence
- 2 Divine and Human Activity in Biblical Narrative
- 3 Narrative Clusters, Providential Habits, and Typological Exegesis
- 4 Proofs of Providence and God’s Philanthropic Character
- 5 True Judgements and Consolation
- 6 The Virtue of Yielding to Providence
- 7 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Scriptural Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Providence and Narrative in the Theology of John Chrysostom , pp. 193 - 212Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Angliviel de la Beaumelle, Laurent, Sabbah, Guy, Festugiere, André-Jean, and Grillet, Bernard. Sozomène. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Livres VII–IX. SC 516. Paris: Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar
Bonniere, F. ‘Jean Chrysostome – Édition de De fato et providentia, introduction, texte critique, notes et index’. PhD diss., Université Lille, 1975.Google Scholar
Canivet, Pierre. Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques. SC 57. Paris: Cerf, 1958.Google Scholar
Dumortier, Jean. Jean Chrysostome. Les cohabitations suspectes: Comment observer la virginité. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1955.Google Scholar
Dumortier, Jean, and Liefooghe, Arthur. Jean Chrysostome. Commentaire sur Isaïe. SC 304. Paris: Cerf, 1983.Google Scholar
Gallay, Paul, with Jourjon, Maurice. Grégoire de Nazianze. Discours 27–31 (Discours Théologiques). SC 250. Paris: Cerf, 1978.Google Scholar
Giet, Stanislas. Basile de Césarée. Homélies due l’Hexaéméron. SC 26. Paris: Cerf, 1949.Google Scholar
Goethe, Alfred. M. Tullii Ciceronis de natura deorum libri tres. Leipzig: Teubner, 1887.Google Scholar
Greer, Rowan. Theodore of Mopsuestia: The Commentaries on the Minor Epistles of Paul. Atlanta: SBL, 2010.Google Scholar
Gummere, Richard M. Seneca. Epistles, Volumes 1–3. LCL 75–77. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–25.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, Ursula, and Hagedorn, Dieter. Johannes Chrysostomos. Kommentar zu Hiob. PTS 35. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Heikel, Ivar A. Eusebius Werke VI. Die Demonstratio Evangelica. GCS 23. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1913.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner, Langerbeck, Hermann, Hörner, Hadwig, Muhlenberg, Ekkehard, and Drobner, Hubertus R.. Gregorii Nysseni Opera. Leiden: Brill, 1952–2014.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Lettre d’exil. À Olympias et à tous les fidèles (Quod nemo laeditur). SC 103. Paris: Cerf, 1964.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Lettres à Olympias. Seconde édition augmentée de la Vie anonyme d’Olympias. SC 13bis. Paris: Cerf, 1968.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Sur la vaine gloire et l’éducation des enfants. SC 188. Paris: Cerf, 1972.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Palladios. Dialogue sur la vie de Jean Chrysostome. SC 341–42. Paris: Cerf, 1988.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Sur la providence de Dieu. SC 79. Paris: Cerf, 2000.Google Scholar
Musurillo, Herbert, and Grillet, Bernard. Jean Chrysostome. La virginité. SC 125. Paris: Cerf, 1966.Google Scholar
Périchon, Pierre, and Maraval, Pierre. Socrate de Constantinople. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Livres IV–VI. SC 505. Paris: Cerf, 2006.Google Scholar
Périchon, Pierre, and Maraval, Pierre. Socrate de Constantinople. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Livre VII. SC 506. Paris: Cerf, 2007.Google Scholar
Schatkin, Margaret A., Grillet, Bernard, Guinot, Jean-Noël, and Blanc, Cécile. Jean Chrysostome: Discours sur Babylas et Homélie sur Babylas. SC 362. Paris: Cerf, 1990.Google Scholar
Schenkl, Henricus. Epicteti dissertations ab Arriano digestae. Leipzig: Teubner, 1894.Google Scholar
Sesboüé, Bernard, de Durand, Georges-Matthie, and Doutreleau, Louis. Basile de Césarée. Contre Eunome, suivi de Eunome, Apologie. Volume 1. SC 299. Paris: Cerf. 1982.Google Scholar
Thackeray, H. St. J. Josephus. Jewish Antiquities, Volume 1: Books 1–3. LCL 242. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Vosté, Jacques-Marie. Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in Evangelium Iohannis Apostoli. CSCO 115–116. Paris: E Typographeo Reipublicae, 1940.Google Scholar
Wenger, Antoine. Jean Chrysostome. Huit catéchèses baptismales inédites. SC 50bis. Paris: Cerf, 1970.Google Scholar
Anderson, Peter J. Seneca: Selected Dialogues and Consolations. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2015.Google Scholar
Coco, Lucio. Johannes Chrysostomus: A Stagirio tormentato da un demone. Rome: Città Nuova, 2002.Google Scholar
Conti, Marco, and Elowsky, Joel C.. Theodore of Mopsuestia: Commentary on the Gospel of John. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2010.Google Scholar
Ford, David C. Saint John Chrysostom: Letters to Saint Olympia. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Halton, Thomas. Theodoret of Cyrus: On Divine Providence. ACW 49. Mahwah, NJ: Newman Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Halton, Thomas. Theodoret of Cyrus: A Cure for Pagan Maladies. ACW 67. Mahwah, NJ: Newman Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hill, Robert C. Saint John Chrysostom: Homilies on Genesis. 3 volumes. FOTC. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hill, Robert C. St. John Chrysostom: Eight Sermons on the Book of Genesis. Boston: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Gauché, Élisabeth. ‘La Consolation à Stagire de Jean Chrysostome. Introduction, traduction et notes’. PhD diss., Université Paris IV-Sorbonne, 2003.Google Scholar
Monk Moses, . St. John Chrysostom: On the Providence of God. Platina, CA: Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2015.Google Scholar
Roth, Catherine P. St John Chrysostom: On Wealth and Poverty. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W., and van der Eijk, P. J.. Nemesius: On the Nature of Man. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Angliviel de la Beaumelle, Laurent, Sabbah, Guy, Festugiere, André-Jean, and Grillet, Bernard. Sozomène. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Livres VII–IX. SC 516. Paris: Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar
Bonniere, F. ‘Jean Chrysostome – Édition de De fato et providentia, introduction, texte critique, notes et index’. PhD diss., Université Lille, 1975.Google Scholar
Canivet, Pierre. Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques. SC 57. Paris: Cerf, 1958.Google Scholar
Dumortier, Jean. Jean Chrysostome. Les cohabitations suspectes: Comment observer la virginité. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1955.Google Scholar
Dumortier, Jean, and Liefooghe, Arthur. Jean Chrysostome. Commentaire sur Isaïe. SC 304. Paris: Cerf, 1983.Google Scholar
Gallay, Paul, with Jourjon, Maurice. Grégoire de Nazianze. Discours 27–31 (Discours Théologiques). SC 250. Paris: Cerf, 1978.Google Scholar
Giet, Stanislas. Basile de Césarée. Homélies due l’Hexaéméron. SC 26. Paris: Cerf, 1949.Google Scholar
Goethe, Alfred. M. Tullii Ciceronis de natura deorum libri tres. Leipzig: Teubner, 1887.Google Scholar
Greer, Rowan. Theodore of Mopsuestia: The Commentaries on the Minor Epistles of Paul. Atlanta: SBL, 2010.Google Scholar
Gummere, Richard M. Seneca. Epistles, Volumes 1–3. LCL 75–77. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–25.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, Ursula, and Hagedorn, Dieter. Johannes Chrysostomos. Kommentar zu Hiob. PTS 35. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Heikel, Ivar A. Eusebius Werke VI. Die Demonstratio Evangelica. GCS 23. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1913.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner, Langerbeck, Hermann, Hörner, Hadwig, Muhlenberg, Ekkehard, and Drobner, Hubertus R.. Gregorii Nysseni Opera. Leiden: Brill, 1952–2014.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Lettre d’exil. À Olympias et à tous les fidèles (Quod nemo laeditur). SC 103. Paris: Cerf, 1964.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Lettres à Olympias. Seconde édition augmentée de la Vie anonyme d’Olympias. SC 13bis. Paris: Cerf, 1968.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Sur la vaine gloire et l’éducation des enfants. SC 188. Paris: Cerf, 1972.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Palladios. Dialogue sur la vie de Jean Chrysostome. SC 341–42. Paris: Cerf, 1988.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. Jean Chrysostome. Sur la providence de Dieu. SC 79. Paris: Cerf, 2000.Google Scholar
Musurillo, Herbert, and Grillet, Bernard. Jean Chrysostome. La virginité. SC 125. Paris: Cerf, 1966.Google Scholar
Périchon, Pierre, and Maraval, Pierre. Socrate de Constantinople. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Livres IV–VI. SC 505. Paris: Cerf, 2006.Google Scholar
Périchon, Pierre, and Maraval, Pierre. Socrate de Constantinople. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Livre VII. SC 506. Paris: Cerf, 2007.Google Scholar
Schatkin, Margaret A., Grillet, Bernard, Guinot, Jean-Noël, and Blanc, Cécile. Jean Chrysostome: Discours sur Babylas et Homélie sur Babylas. SC 362. Paris: Cerf, 1990.Google Scholar
Schenkl, Henricus. Epicteti dissertations ab Arriano digestae. Leipzig: Teubner, 1894.Google Scholar
Sesboüé, Bernard, de Durand, Georges-Matthie, and Doutreleau, Louis. Basile de Césarée. Contre Eunome, suivi de Eunome, Apologie. Volume 1. SC 299. Paris: Cerf. 1982.Google Scholar
Thackeray, H. St. J. Josephus. Jewish Antiquities, Volume 1: Books 1–3. LCL 242. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Vosté, Jacques-Marie. Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in Evangelium Iohannis Apostoli. CSCO 115–116. Paris: E Typographeo Reipublicae, 1940.Google Scholar
Wenger, Antoine. Jean Chrysostome. Huit catéchèses baptismales inédites. SC 50bis. Paris: Cerf, 1970.Google Scholar
Anderson, Peter J. Seneca: Selected Dialogues and Consolations. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2015.Google Scholar
Coco, Lucio. Johannes Chrysostomus: A Stagirio tormentato da un demone. Rome: Città Nuova, 2002.Google Scholar
Conti, Marco, and Elowsky, Joel C.. Theodore of Mopsuestia: Commentary on the Gospel of John. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2010.Google Scholar
Ford, David C. Saint John Chrysostom: Letters to Saint Olympia. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Halton, Thomas. Theodoret of Cyrus: On Divine Providence. ACW 49. Mahwah, NJ: Newman Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Halton, Thomas. Theodoret of Cyrus: A Cure for Pagan Maladies. ACW 67. Mahwah, NJ: Newman Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hill, Robert C. Saint John Chrysostom: Homilies on Genesis. 3 volumes. FOTC. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hill, Robert C. St. John Chrysostom: Eight Sermons on the Book of Genesis. Boston: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Gauché, Élisabeth. ‘La Consolation à Stagire de Jean Chrysostome. Introduction, traduction et notes’. PhD diss., Université Paris IV-Sorbonne, 2003.Google Scholar
Monk Moses, . St. John Chrysostom: On the Providence of God. Platina, CA: Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2015.Google Scholar
Roth, Catherine P. St John Chrysostom: On Wealth and Poverty. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W., and van der Eijk, P. J.. Nemesius: On the Nature of Man. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Adler, William. ‘The Chronographiae of Julius Africanus and Its Jewish Antecedents’. ZAC 14, no. 3 (2011): 496–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Paul. St Jean Chrysostome considéré comme orateur populaire. Paris: Hachette, 1858.Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe. ‘Stoic Theology’. Pages 153–78 in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe. ‘Plutarch and the Stoic Theory of Providence’. Pages 121–26 in Fate, Providence, and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought: Studies in Honour of Carlos Steel. Edited by d’Hoine, Pieter and Van Riel, Gerd. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Allen, Pauline, and Mayer, Wendy. ‘Chrysostom and the Preaching of Homilies in Series: A New Approach to the Twelve Homilies “In epistulam ad Colossenses” (CPG 4433)’. OCP 60, no. 1 (1994): 21–39.Google Scholar
Allen, Pauline, and Mayer, Wendy. ‘Chrysostom and the Preaching of Homilies in Series: A Re-examination of the Fifteen Homilies “In epistulam ad Philippenses” (CPG 4432)’. VC 49, no. 3 (1995): 270–89.Google Scholar
Allen, Pauline, and Mayer, Wendy. ‘The Thirty-Four Homilies on Hebrews: The Last Series Delivered by Chrysostom in Constantinople?’ Byzantion 65, no. 2 (1995): 309–48.Google Scholar
Amand de Mendieta, Emmanuel. ‘L’amplification d’un thème socratique et stoïcien dans l’avant dernier traité de Jean Chrysostome’. Byzantion 36 (1966): 353–81.Google Scholar
Ameringer, Thomas Edward. The Stylistic Influence of the Second Sophistic on the Panegyrical Sermons of St. John Chrysostom: A Study in Greek Rhetoric. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Amirav, Hagit. Rhetoric and Tradition: John Chrysostom on Noah and the Flood. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Aspesi, Cara J. ‘Literacy and Book Ownership in the Congregations of John Chrysostom’. StPatr 67 (2013): 333–44.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. The Interpretation of Biblical History in the Antiquitates Judaicae of Flavius Josephus. Missoula: Scholars Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Augustin, Pierre. ‘Le sixième Discours sur Lazare attribué à Jean Chrysostome: la question de l’authenticité’. Pages 1–38 in John Chrysostom and Severian of Gabala: Homilists, Exegetes and Theologians. Edited by Leemans, Johan, Roskam, Geert, and Segers, Josien. Leuven: Peeters, 2019.Google Scholar
Azar, Michael G. Exegeting the Jews: The Early Reception of the Johannine ‘Jews’. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Baltussen, Han. ‘Introduction’. Pages xiii–xx in Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife. Edited by Baltussen, Han. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2013.Google Scholar
Banicki, Konrad. ‘Therapeutic Arguments, Spiritual Exercises, or the Care of the Self: Martha Nussbaum, Pierre Hadot and Michel Foucault on Ancient Philosophy’. Ethical Perspectives 22, no. 4 (2015): 601–34.Google Scholar
Bardolle, M.-A. ‘Tristesse (athumia) et thérapeutique spirituelle dans l’Exhortation à Stagire de Chrysostome’. Lettre de Ligugé 241, no. 3 (1987): 6–19.Google Scholar
Barone, Francesca Prometea. ‘Le vocabulaire de la patience chez Jean Chrysostome: les mots ἀνεξικακία et ὑπομονή’. Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 81, no. 1 (2007): 5–12.Google Scholar
Baur, Chrysostomus. Heilige Johannes Chrysostomus und seine Zeit. 2 volumes. Munich: Hueber, 1929–30. [English translation: John Chrysostom and His Time. 2 volumes. Translated by M. Gonzaga. Westminster, MD: Newman, 1959–60.]Google Scholar
Becker, Matthew L. The Self-Giving God and Salvation History: The Trinitarian Theology of Johannes von Hofmann. New York: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Beeley, Christopher. Gregory of Nazianzus on the Trinity and the Knowledge of God: In Your Light Shall We See Light. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Thomas. ‘How Industrious Can Zeus Be?’ Pages 23–45 in God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Edited by Salles, Ricardo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bergjan, Silke-Petra. Der fürsorgende Gott: Der Begriff der ΠΡΟΝΟΙΑ Gottes in der apologetischen Literatur der Alten Kirche. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergjan, Silke-Petra. ‘Clement of Alexandria on God’s Providence and the Gnostic’s Life Choice: The Concept of Pronoia in the Stromateis, Book VII’. Pages 63–92 in The Seventh Book of the Stromateis. Edited by Havrda, Matyáš, Hušek, Vít, and Plátová, Jana. Brill: Leiden, 2012.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Ben C. ‘The Covenant of Promise: Abraham in Irenaeus’. Pages 147–67 in Irenaeus and Paul. Edited by Wilhite, David E. and Still, Todd D.. London: T&T Clark/Bloomsbury, 2020.Google Scholar
Blowers, Paul M. Drama of the Divine Economy: Creator and Creation in Early Christian Theology and Piety. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bobzien, Susanne. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, Emilio. ‘John Chrysostom’s Discourses on His First Exile: Prolegomena to a Critical Edition of the Sermo antequam iret in exsilium and of the Sermo cum iret in exsilium’. PhD diss., University of Oxford, 2012.Google Scholar
Bozinis, Constantine. ‘The Natural Law in John Chrysostom’. Pages 493–524 in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives. Edited by De Wet, Chris L. and Mayer, Wendy. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Brändle, Rudolf. ‘Jean Chrysostome: l’importance de Matth. 25,31–46 pour son éthique’. VC 31, no. 1 (1977): 47–52.Google Scholar
Brändle, Rudolf. Matth. 25,31–46 im Werk des Johannes Chrysostomos: Ein Beitrag zur Auslegungsgeschichte und zur Erforschung der Ethik der griechischen Kirche um die Wende vom 4. Zum 5. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1979.Google Scholar
Brändle, Rudolf. ‘Synergismus als Phänomen der Frömmigkeitsgeschichte, dargestellt an den Predigten des Johannes Chrysostomus’. Pages 69–89 and 113–21 in Gnadenwahl und Entscheidungsfreiheit in der Theologie der alten Kirche. Vorträge gehalten auf der patristischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, 3.-5. Januar 1979 in Bethel. Edited by von Lilienfeld, F. and Mühlenberg, E.. Erlangen: Lehrstuhl für Geschichte und Theologie des Christlichen Ostens, 1980.Google Scholar
Broc-Schmezer, Catherine. ‘Lectures et récritures chrysostomiennes des premieres chapitres de Genèse’. Graphè 17 (2008): 95–125.Google Scholar
Broc-Schmezer, Catherine. Figures féminines du Nouveau Testament dans l’oeuvre de Jean Chrysostome: Exégese et pastorale. Paris: Insitut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2010.Google Scholar
Brottier, Laurence. ‘La résurrection: source et but de la spiritualité chrysostomienne’. Connaissance des Pères de l’Église 43 (1991): 16–17.Google Scholar
Brottier, Laurence. ‘La résurrection: est-elle un retour à paradis?’. Connaissance des Pères de l’Eglise 43 (1991): 18–20.Google Scholar
Brottier, Laurence. ‘“Et la fournaise devint source”: l’épisode des trois jeunes gens dans la fournaise (Dan 3) lu par Jean Chrysostome’. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses 71, no. 3 (1991): 309–27.Google Scholar
Brottier, Laurence. ‘L’actualisation de la figure de Job chez Jean Chrysostome’. Pages 63–110 in Le livre de Job chez les Pères de l’Église. Strasbourg: Centre d’Analyse et de Documentation Patristiques, 1996.Google Scholar
Brottier, Laurence. ‘Un jeu de mots intraduisible: le combat entre thumos et athumia dans des homélies de Jean Chrysostome’. Revue de Philologie, de Littérature et d’Histoire Anciennes 72, no. 2 (1998): 189–204.Google Scholar
Brottier, Laurence. L’appel des ‘demi-chrétiens’ à la ‘vie angélique’. Jean Chrysostome prédicateur: entre idéal monastique et réalité mondaine. Paris: Cerf, 2005.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. W., and Kulikowski, Michael. Mosaics of Time: The Latin Chronicle Traditions from the First Century BC to the Sixth Century AD. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013.Google Scholar
Burns, Mary Albania. Saint John Chrysostom’s Homilies on the Statues: A Study of Their Rhetorical Qualities and Form. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil. ‘Divine Providence in Late Antiquity’. Pages 118–43 in Predicting the Future. Edited by Howe, Leo and Wain, Alan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Carter, Robert E. ‘Saint John Chrysostom’s Rhetorical Use of the Socratic Distinction between Kingship and Tyranny’. Traditio 14 (1958): 367–71.Google Scholar
Carter, Robert E. ‘The Future of Chrysostom Studies: Theology and Nachleben’. Pages 129–36 in Symposion: Studies on St. John Chrysostom. Edited by Christou, Panayotis. Thessaloniki: Patriarchikon Hidryma Paterikon Meleton, 1973.Google Scholar
Carter, Robert E. ‘The Image of God in Man and Woman according to Severian of Gabala and the Antiochene Tradition’. OCP 69, no. 1 (2003): 163–78.Google Scholar
Chase, F. H. Chrysostom: A Study in the History of Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1887.Google Scholar
Chesnut, Glenn F. The First Christian Histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius. Paris: Beauchesne, 1977.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, Chrysanthos S. Plutarch’s Parallel Lives: Narrative Technique and Moral Judgment. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.Google Scholar
Ciarlo, Domenico. ‘Sulla teoria e la prassi della Providentia Dei in Giovanni Crisostomo’. Atti Accademia Pontaniana, Napoli (n.s.) 56 (2007): 87–94.Google Scholar
Clapsis, Emmanuel. ‘The Dignity of the Poor and Almsgiving in St. John Chrysostom’. GOTR 56, nos. 1–4 (2011): 55–87.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. ‘Sexual Politics in the Writings of John Chrysostom’. AThR 59, no. 1 (1977): 3–20.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. Reading Renunciation: Asceticism and Scripture in Early Christianity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. ‘The Celibate Bridegroom and His Virginal Brides: Metaphor and the Marriage of Jesus in Early Christian Ascetic Exegesis’. CH 77, no. 1 (2008): 1–25.Google Scholar
Coleman-Norton, P. R. ‘St. Chrysostom and the Greek Philosophers’. CP 35, no. 4 (1930): 305–17.Google Scholar
Cook, James Daniel. Preaching and Popular Christianity: Reading the Sermons of John Chrysostom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Cook, James Daniel. ‘“Hear and Shudder!”: Chrysostom’s Therapy of the Soul’. Pages 247–75 in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives. Edited by de Wet, Chris L. and Mayer, Wendy. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Cracco Ruggini, Lellia. ‘The Ecclesiastical Histories and the Pagan Historiography: Providence and Miracles’. Athenaeum 55 (1977): 107–26.Google Scholar
Crépey, Cyrille. ‘La recompense, un theme majeur dans le discours pastoral de Jean Chrysostome’. RevScRel 83, no. 1 (2009): 97–113.Google Scholar
Crépey, Cyrille. ‘Le vrai sens de la littéralité de l’exégèse dans les Homélies sur la Genèse de Jean Chrysostome: illustration à partir de l’exégèse de Gn 1:1’. StPatr 47 (2010): 249–54.Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. Christus und die Zeit: Die urchristliche Zeit- und Geschichtsauffassung. Zollikon-Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1946. [English translation: Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History. Translated by Floyd V. Filson. London: SCM, 1951.]Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. Heil als Geschichte: Heilsgeschichtliche Existenz im Neuen Testament. Tübingen: Mohr, 1965. [English translation: Salvation in History. Translated by Sidney G. Sowers. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.]Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. The Hope of the Early Church: A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Danassis, Antonios K. Johannes Chrysostomos: Pädagogisch-psychologische Ideen in seinem Werk. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1971.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. Sacramentum futuri: études sur les origines de la typologie biblique. Paris: Beauchesne, 1950. [English translation: From Shadows to Reality: Studies in Biblical Typology of the Fathers. Translated by Wulstan Hibberd. London: Burns & Oates, 1960.]Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. ‘L’incompréhensibilité de Dieu d’après saint Jean Chrysostome’. RSR 37 (1950): 176–94.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. ‘Le traité ‘Sur les enfants morts prématurément’ de Grégoire de Nysse’. VC 20 (1966): 159–82.Google Scholar
Dawson, David. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
De Margerie, Bertrand. Introduction à l’histoire de l’exégèse I: Les Pères grecs et orientaux. Paris: Cerf, 1980.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, Koen. ‘Ancient Rhetoric as a Hermeneutical Tool for the Analysis of Characterization in Narrative Literature’. Rhetorica 28, no. 1 (2010): 23–51.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, Koen, and van Emde Boas, Evert. ‘Character and Characterization in Ancient Greek Literature: An Introduction’. Pages 1–23 in Characterization in Ancient Greek Literature. Edited by De Temmerman, Koen and van Emde Boas, Evert. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
De Wet, Chris L. ‘Human Birth and Spiritual Rebirth in the Theological Thought of John Chrysostom’. In die Skriflig 51, no. 3 (2017): 1–9.Google Scholar
De Wet, Chris L. ‘Angels in John Chrysostom’s Anthropology: Asceticism, Angelomorphism, and Human Bodily Composition in Flux’. Journal of Early Christian History 10, no. 1 (2020): 21–36.Google Scholar
Degen, Heinrich. Die Tropen der Vergleichung bei Johannes Chrysostomus: Beitrag zur Geschichte von Metapher, Allegorie und Gleichnis in der griechischen Prosaliteratur. Olten: Otto Walter, 1921.Google Scholar
Demoen, Kristoffel. Pagan and Biblical Exempla in Gregory Nazianzen: A Study in Rhetoric and Hermeneutics. Turnhout: Brepols, 1996.Google Scholar
Demoen, Kristoffel. ‘A Paradigm for the Analysis of Paradigms: The Rhetorical Exemplum in Ancient and Imperial Greek Theory’. Rhetorica 15, no. 2 (1997): 125–58.Google Scholar
Derow, Peter. ‘Historical Explanation: Polybius and His Predecessors’. Pages 73–90 in Greek Historiography. Edited by Hornblower, Simon. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. ‘That Dangerous Supplement’. Pages 141–64 in Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dihle, Albrecht. ‘Liberté et destin dans l’antiquité tardive’. Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie 121 (1989): 129–47.Google Scholar
Dragas, George D. ‘St. John Chrysostom’s Doctrine of God’s Providence’. Ekklesiastikos Pharos 57 (1957): 375–406.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, Myrto. ‘Divine Providence in the Philosophy of Empire’. ANRW II 36, no. 7 (1994): 4417–90.Google Scholar
Duff, Timothy E. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Dumortier, Jean. ‘La culture profane de Saint Jean Chrysostome’. MScRel 10 (1953): 53–62.Google Scholar
Dumortier, Jean. ‘Les idées morales de Saint Jean Chrysostome’. MScRel 12, no. 1 (1955): 28–29.Google Scholar
Dunning, Benjamin. ‘Chrysostom’s Serpent: Animality and Gender in the Homilies on Genesis’. JECS 23, no. 1 (2015): 71–95.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert G. T. ‘Healing Despondency with Biblical Narrative in John Chrysostom’s Letters to Olympias’. JECS 28, no. 2 (2020): 203–31.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert G. T. ‘Antiochene Christology and the Gospel of John: The Diverging Cases of Theodore of Mopsuestia and John Chrysostom’. SJT 74, no. 4 (2021): 333–345.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert G. T. ‘Providence, Ethics, and Exempla: Reassessing the Stoicism of John Chrysostom’s Quod nemo laeditur nisi a se ipso’. Pages 217–44 in Greek and Byzantine Philosophical Exegesis. Edited by Wallace, James and Despotis, Athanasios. Paderborn: Brill Deutschland/Schöningh, 2022.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert G. T. ‘Divine Incomprehensibility and Human Faith in John Chrysostom’. VC, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. ‘The Text of John and Mark in the Writings of Chrysostom’. NTS 26, no. 4 (1980): 525–47.Google Scholar
Finn, Douglas. ‘Sympathetic Philosophy: The Christian Response to Suffering according to John Chrysostom’s Commentary on Job’. Pages 97–119 in Suffering and Evil in Early Christian Thought. Edited by Harrison, Nonna Verna and Hunter, David G.. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Finn, Douglas. ‘Job as Exemplary Father according to John Chrysostom’. JECS 26, no. 2 (2018): 275–305.Google Scholar
Finn, Douglas. ‘Job and His Wife as Exemplary Figures in the Preaching of John Chrysostom’. ZAC 23, no. 3 (2019): 479–515.Google Scholar
Finn, Douglas, and Dupont, Anthony. ‘Preaching Adam in John Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo’. VC 73, no. 2 (2019): 190–217.Google Scholar
Fishbane, Michael. Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.Google Scholar
Foerster, Theodor. Chrysostomus in seinem Verhältniss zur antiochenischen Schule: Ein Beitrag zur Dogmengeschichte. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1869.Google Scholar
Fornara, Charles William. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans W. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise. Du masque au visage: Aspects de l’identité en Grèce ancienne. Rev. ed. Paris: Flammarion, 2012.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. ‘Ancient Psychotherapy’. Journal of the History of Ideas 46, no. 3 (1985): 307–25.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. ‘Philosophical Therapy as Preventative Psychological Medicine’. Pages 339–60 in Mental Disorders in the Classical World. Edited by Harris, William V.. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Gorday, Peter. Principles of Patristic Exegesis: Romans 9–11 in Origen, John Chrysostom, and Augustine. New York: Mellen, 1983.Google Scholar
Graham, Susan L. ‘Irenaeus and the Covenants: “Immortal Diamond”’. StPatr 40 (2006): 393–98.Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret. ‘Philo of Alexandria and the Origin of the Stoic προπάθειαι’. Phronesis 44, no. 4 (1999): 300–25.Google Scholar
Greene, William Chase. Moira: Fate, Good, and Evil in Greek Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Greer, Rowan A. Theodore of Mopsuestia: Exegete and Theologian. London: The Faith Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert C. Consolation Philosophy: Greek and Christian Paideia in Basil and the Two Gregories. Cambridge, MA: Philadelphia Patristic Foundation, 1975.Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. ‘Narrative Grammar: Units and Levels’. Modern Language Notes 86 (1971): 793–806.Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. ‘Elements of a Narrative Grammar’. Diacritics 7 (1977): 23–40.Google Scholar
Guinot, Jean-Noël. ‘Les exempla bibliques dans l’Ad Stagirium de Jean Chrysostome: proposition d’une clef de lecture’. Pages 163–83 in Giovanni Crisostomo: Oriente e occidente tra IV e V secolo, XXXIII Incontro di Studiosi dell’Antichità Cristiana, Augustinianum 6–8 Maggio 2004, Roma. Rome: Augustinianum, 2005.Google Scholar
Hainthaler, Theresia. ‘Pronoia bei Johannes Chrysostomus in De providentia und seinen Briefen an Olympias’. Pages 145–61 in Pronoia. The Providence of God. Die Vorsehung Gottes. Forscher aus dem Osten und Westen Europas an den Quellen des gemeinsamen Glauben: Studiendtagung Warschau, 30. August–4. September 2017. Edited by Hainthaler, T., Mali, F., and Ostermann, M. Lenkaityte. Innsbruck: Tyrolia, 2019.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher A. ‘John Chrysostom’s On Providence: A Translation and Theological Interpretation’. PhD diss., Drew University, 1991.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher A. ‘Nature Wild and Tame in St. John Chrysostom’s On the Providence of God’. Pages 23–37 in Ancient and Postmodern Christianity: Paleo-Orthodoxy in the 21st Century: Essays in Honor of Thomas C. Oden. Edited by Tanner, Kenneth and Hall, Christopher A.. Downer’s Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. Aristotle’s Poetics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Halton, Thomas. ‘Saint John Chrysostom, “De Fato et Providentia”: A Study of Its Authenticity’. Traditio 20 (1964): 1–24.Google Scholar
Hannan, Sean. ‘Nineveh Overturned: Augustine and Chrysostom on the Threat of Jonah’. JECS 28, no. 1 (2020): 61–87.Google Scholar
Harmless, William, and Fitzgerald, Raymond R.. ‘The Sapphire Light of the Mind: The Skemmata of Evagrius Ponticus’. TS 62, no. 3 (2001): 498–529.Google Scholar
Harrison, Nonna Verna. ‘Women and the Image of God according to St. John Chrysostom’. Pages 259–79 in In Dominico Eloquio – In Lordly Eloquence: Essays on Patristic Exegesis in Honor of Robert Louis Wilken. Edited by Blowers, Paul M., Christman, Angela Russell, Hunter, David G., and Young, Robin Darling. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Hau, Lisa Irene. Moral History from Herodotus to Diodorus Siculus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Havrda, Matyáš. ‘Grace and Free Will according to Clement of Alexandria’. JECS 19, no. 1 (2011): 21–48.Google Scholar
Hay, Camillus. ‘St John Chrysostom and the Integrity of the Human Nature of Christ’. Franciscan Studies 19, nos. 3–4 (1959): 298–317.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin. ‘Heilsgeschichte’. Pages 3–34 in Heil und Geschichte: Die Geschichtsbezogenheit des Heils und das Problem der Heilsgeschichte in der biblischen Tradition und in der theologischen Deutung. Edited by Frey, Jörg, Krauter, Stefan, and Lichtenberg, Hermann. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Hennings, Ralph. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Augustinus und Hieronymus und ihr Streit um den Kanon des Alten Testaments und die Auslegung von Gal. 2,11–14. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Hidal, Sten. ‘Exegesis of the Old Testament in the Antiochene School with Its Prevalent Literal and Historical Method’. Pages 543–68 in Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. Volume I, From the Beginning to the Middle Ages (until 1300). Part 1: Antiquity. Edited by Sæbø, Magne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.Google Scholar
Hill, Robert C. ‘Akribeia: A Principle of Chrysostom’s Exegesis’. Colloquium 14, no. 1 (1981): 32–36.Google Scholar
Hillner, Julia. ‘Confined Exiles: An Aspect of the Late Antique Prison System’. Millennium 10 (2013): 385–433.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G. ‘Borrowings from Libanius in the “Comparatio regis et monachi” of St John Chrysostom’. JTS 39, no. 2 (1988): 525–31.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G. John Chrysostom: A Comparison between a King and a Monk / Against the Opponents of the Monastic Life: Two Treatises. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 1988.Google Scholar
Jashi, Zurab. ‘Human Freedom and Divine Providence according to Gregory of Nazianzus’. StPatr 67 (2013): 199–205.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. ‘“Diatribes” and the Greek Book-Title Διατριβαί’. Liverpool Classical Monthly 8 (1983): 89–91.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Fabienne. ‘La théodicée développée sur le thème du larcin des Grecs: origine du mal, liberté et Providence chez Clément d’Alexandrie (Stromates I 17,81–87)’. Semitica et Classica 4 (2011): 147–70.Google Scholar
Kalantzis, George. ‘Creatio ex Terrae: Immortality and the Fall in Theodore, Chrysostom, and Theodoret’. StPatr 67 (2013): 403–13.Google Scholar
Kannengiesser, Charles. ‘Le mystère pascal du Christ mort et ressuscité selon Jean Chrysostome’. Pages 221–46 in Jean Chrysostome et Augustin: Actes du Colloque de Chantilly 22–24 Septembre 1974. Edited by Kannengiesser, Charles. Paris: Beauchesne, 1975.Google Scholar
Kannengiesser, Charles. ‘“Clothed with Spiritual Fire”: John Chrysostom’s Homilies on the Letter to Hebrews’. Pages 74–83 in Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews: Profiles from the History of Interpretation. Edited by Laansma, Jon C. and Treier, Daniel J.. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.Google Scholar
Karmann, Thomas R. ‘Johannes Chrysostomus und der Neunizänismus: eine Spurensuche in ausgewählten Predigten des antiochenischen Presbyters’. SacEr 51 (2012): 79–107.Google Scholar
Katos, Demetrios S. Palladius of Helenopolis: The Origenist Advocate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kecskeméti, Judit. ‘Exégèse Chrysostomienne et exégèse engagée’. StPatr 22 (1989): 136–47.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D. Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom – Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: SBL, 2003.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. ‘Was St. John Chrysostom a Semi-Pelagian?’. ITQ 27, no. 1 (1960): 16–29.Google Scholar
Koch, Hal. Pronoia und Paideusis: Studien über Origenes und sein Verhältnis zum Platonismus. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1932.Google Scholar
Lai, Pak-Wah. ‘John Chrysostom and the Hermeneutics of Exemplar Portraits’. PhD diss., Durham University, 2010.Google Scholar
Lai, Pak-Wah. ‘The Imago Dei and Salvation among the Antiochenes: A Comparison of John Chrysostom with Theodore of Mopsuestia’. StPatr 67 (2013): 393–402.Google Scholar
Lai, Pak-Wah. ‘The Eusebian and Meletian Roots of John Chrysostom’s Trinitarian Theology’. Scrinium 14, no. 1 (2018): 37–62.Google Scholar
Laird, Raymond J. Mindset, Moral Choice and Sin in the Anthropology of John Chrysostom. Strathfield, NSW: St Pauls, 2012.Google Scholar
Laird, Raymond J. ‘John Chrysostom and the Anomoeans: Shaping an Antiochene Perspective on Christology’. Pages 129–49 in Religious Conflict from Early Christianity to the Rise of Islam. Edited by Mayer, Wendy and Neil, Bronwen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Laird, Raymond J. ‘It’s All in the Mindset: John Chrysostom and the Great Moments of Personal Destiny’. Pages 195–210 in Men and Women in the Early Christian Centuries. Edited by Mayer, Wendy and Elmer, Ian J.. Strathfield, NSW: St. Paul’s, 2014.Google Scholar
Leduc, Francis. ‘L’eschatologie, une preoccupation centrale de Saint Jean Chrysostome’. Proche-Orient Chretien 19 (1969): 109–34.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘The Structural Study of Myth’. Pages 206–30 in Structural Anthropology. Volume 1. Translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Basic Books, 1963.Google Scholar
Leyerle, Blake. ‘John Chrysostom on Almsgiving and the Use of Money’. HTR 87, no. 1 (1994): 29–47.Google Scholar
Leyerle, Blake. Theatrical Shows and Ascetic Lives: John Chrysostom’s Attack on Spiritual Marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Leyerle, Blake. ‘The Etiology of Sorrow and Its Therapeutic Benefits in the Preaching of John Chrysostom’. JLA 8, no. 2 (2015): 368–85.Google Scholar
Leyerle, Blake. The Narrative Shape of Emotion in the Preaching of John Chrysostom. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Leyerle, Blake. ‘The Strategic Use of Fear in the Preaching of John Chrysostom’. Pages 173–87 in Social Control in Late Antiquity: The Violence of Small Worlds. Edited by Cooper, Kate and Wood, Jamie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, Wolf. ‘How God Made the World in Seven Days: The Commentaries on Genesis of John Chrysostom (Homilies 1–12) and of Eusebius of Emesa (1–10), Two Distinct Representatives of the School of Antioch’. Antiquité tardive 22 (2014): 243–53.Google Scholar
Lim, Richard. Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Long, Timothy. Repetition and Variation in the Short Stories of Herodotus. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1987.Google Scholar
Lössl, Josef. ‘Continuity and Transformation of Ancient Consolation in Augustine of Hippo’. Pages 153–75 in Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife. Edited by Baltussen, Han. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2013.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. ‘John Chrysostom and the Antiochene School to Theodoret of Cyrus’. Pages 342–52 in The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature. Edited by Young, Frances, Ayres, Lewis, and Louth, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. ‘Pagans and Christians on Providence’. Pages 279–97 in Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity: Inheritance, Authority, and Change. Edited by Scourfield, J. H. D and Chahoud, Anna. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2007.Google Scholar
Luneau, Auguste. L’histoire du salut chez les Pères de l’Église: La doctrine des ages du monde. Paris: Beauchesne, 1964.Google Scholar
Maat, William Anthony. A Rhetorical Study of St. John Chrysostom’s De Sacerdotio. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Magris, Aldo. Destino, provvidenza, predestinazione: Dal mondo antico al cristianesimo. Brescia: Morcelliana, 2008.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. ‘Philosophia’: Étude d’un groupe de mots dans la littérature grecque, des Présocratiques au IVe siècles après J.-C. Paris: Klincksieck, 1961.Google Scholar
Malingrey, Anne-Marie. ‘Saint Jean Chrysostome Moraliste?’. Pages 171–79 in Valeurs dans le stoïcisme: du Portique à nos jours. Textes rassemblés en hommage à Michel Spanneut. Edited by Soetard, M.. Lille: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993.Google Scholar
Malunowiczówna, Leokadia. ‘Les éléments stoïciens dans la consolation grecque chrétienne’. StPatr 13 (1975): 35–45.Google Scholar
Markowicz, Walter A. ‘Chrysostom’s Sermons on Genesis: A Problem’. TS 24, no. 4 (1963): 652–64.Google Scholar
Markus, R. A. ‘The Roman Empire in Early Christian Historiography’. The Downside Review 81, no. 265 (1963): 340–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, Peter. ‘Revisiting the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen’. JECS 16, no. 3 (2008): 283–317.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter. ‘Origen against History? Reconsidering the Critique of Allegory’. Modern Theology 28, no. 4 (2012): 635–56.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Pierre. Providentia deorum: Recherches sur certains aspects religieux du pouvoir imperial romain. Rome: École française de Rome, 1982.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Jaclyn L. Christianization and Communication in Late Antiquity: John Chrysostom and His Congregation in Antioch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘Patronage, Pastoral Care and the Role of the Bishop at Antioch’. VC 55, no. 1 (2001): 58–70.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. The Homilies of St John Chrysostom: Provenance, Reshaping the Foundations. Rome: Orientalium, 2005.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘Progress in the Field of Chrysostom Studies (1984–2004)’. Pages 9–35 in Giovanni Crisostomo. Oriente e occidente tra IV e V secolo. XXXIII Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità christiana. Roma, 6–8 maggio 2004. Rome: Augustinianum, 2005.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘John Chrysostom’s Use of the Parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16:19–31)’. Scrinium 4 (2008): 45–59.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘The Making of a Saint: John Chrysostom in Early Historiography’. Pages 39–59 in Chrysostomosbilder in 1600 Jahren: Facetten der Wirkungsgeschichte eines Kirchenvaters. Edited by Wallraff, Martin and Brändle, Rudolf. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘Media Manipulation as a Tool in Religious Conflict: Controlling the Narrative Surrounding the Deposition of John Chrysostom’. Pages 151–68 in Religious Conflict from Early Christianity to the Rise of Islam. Edited by Mayer, Wendy and Neil, Bronwen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘John Chrysostom’. Pages 141–54 in The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Patristics. Edited by Parry, Ken. Oxford: Blackwell, 2015.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘The Persistence in Late Antiquity of Medico-Philosophical Psychic Therapy’. JLA 8, no. 2 (2015): 337–51.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘Shaping the Sick Soul: Reshaping the Identity of John Chrysostom’. Pages 140–64 in Christians Shaping Identity from the Roman Empire to Byzantium: Studies Inspired by Pauline Allen. Edited by Dunn, Geoffrey and Mayer, Wendy. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wendy. ‘The Homiletic Audience as Embodied Hermeneutic: Scripture and Its Interpretation in the Exegetical Preaching of John Chrysostom’. Pages 11–28 in Hymns, Homilies and Hermeneutics in Byzantium. Edited by Gador-Whyte, Sarah and Mellas, Andrew. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
McLeod, Frederick G. The Roles of Christ’s Humanity in Salvation: Insights from Theodore of Mopsuestia. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar
McNamara, Kevin. ‘Theodore of Mopsuestia and the Nestorian Heresy’. ITQ 19, no. 3 (1952): 254–78.Google Scholar
McNamara, Kevin. ‘Theodore of Mopsuestia and the Nestorian Heresy II’. ITQ 20, no. 2 (1953): 172–91.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. ‘Lucian and the Lucianic Recension of the Greek Bible’. NTS 8, no. 3 (1962): 189–203.Google Scholar
Meyer, Louis. Saint Jean Chrysostome: Maître de perfection chrétienne. Paris: Beauchesne, 1933.Google Scholar
Michaud, Eugène. ‘St. Jean Chrysostome et l’apokatastase’. Revue internationale de théologie 18, no. 72 (1910): 672–96.Google Scholar
Miller, Samantha. ‘The Devil Did Not Make You Do It: Chrysostom’s Refutation of Modern Deliverance Theology’. Pages 613–37 in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives. Edited by De Wet, Chris L. and Mayer, Wendy. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Miller, Samantha. ‘The Exemplary Role of Adam and Eve in John Chrysostom’s Virtue-Building Program’. Pages 121–35 in John Chrysostom and Severian of Gabala: Homilists, Exegetes and Theologians. Edited by Leemans, Johan, Roskam, Geert, and Segers, Josien. Leuven: Peeters, 2019.Google Scholar
Miller, Samantha. Chrysostom’s Devil: Demons, the Will, and Virtue in Patristic Soteriology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jane F. ‘Consolatory Letters in Basil and Gregory Nazianzen’. Hermes 96, no. 3 (1968): 299–318.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. ‘The Archetypal Image: John Chrysostom’s Portraits of Paul’. JR 75, no. 1 (1995): 15–43.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. ‘“A Variable and Many-Sorted Man”: John Chrysostom’s Treatment of Pauline Inconsistency’. JECS 6, no. 1 (1998): 93–111.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. The Heavenly Trumpet: John Chrysostom and the Art of Pauline Interpretation. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. ‘Patristic Rhetoric on Allegory: Origen and Eustathius Put 1 Samuel on Trial’. JR 85, no. 3 (2005): 414–45.Google Scholar
Molinié, Pierre. Jean Chrysostome exégète: Le commentaire homilétique de la Deuxième épître de Paul aux Corinthiens. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Orientale, 2019.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. ‘Goodness, Evil and the Free Will of Man in Gregory of Nyssa’. Pages 343–56 in Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought. Edited by d’Hoine, Pieter and Van Riel, Gerd. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Muehlberger, Ellen. ‘Ambivalence about the Angelic Life: The Promise and Perils of an Early Christian Discourse of Asceticism’. JECS 16, no. 4 (2008): 447–78.Google Scholar
Muehlberger, Ellen. Angels in Late Ancient Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Muehlberger, Ellen. ‘Affecting Rhetoric: The Adoption of Ethopoeia in Evagrius of Pontus’ Ascetic Program’. Pages 182–94 in Monastic Education in Late Antiquity: The Transformation of Classical Paideia. Edited by Larsen, Lillian I. and Rubenson, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Naegele, Anton. ‘Johannes Chrysostomos und sein Verhältnis zum Hellenismus’. ByzZ 13, no. 1 (1904): 73–113.Google Scholar
Naidu, Ashish J. ‘The First Adam – Second Adam Typology in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria’. Perichoresis 12, no. 2 (2014): 153–62.Google Scholar
Nassif, Bradley. ‘Antiochene Θεωρία in John Chrysostom’s Exegesis’. PhD diss., Fordham University, 1991.Google Scholar
Nassif, Bradley. ‘Antiochene Θεωρία in John Chrysostom’s Exegesis’. Pages 49–67 in Ancient & Postmodern Christianity: Paleo-Orthodoxy in the 21st Century: Essays in Honor of Thomas C. Oden. Edited by Tanner, Kenneth and Hall, Christopher A.. Downer’s Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002.Google Scholar
Nassif, Bradley. ‘John Chrysostom on the Nature of Revelation and Task of Exegesis’. Pages 49–66 in What Is the Bible? The Patristic Doctrine of Scripture. Edited by Baker, Matthew and Mourachian, Mark. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 2016.Google Scholar
Neil, Bronwen. ‘Divine Providence and Free Will in Gregory of Nyssa and His Theological Milieu’. Phronema 27, no. 2 (2012): 35–51.Google Scholar
Norris, Richard A. Manhood and Christ: A Study in the Christology of Theodore of Mopsuestia. Oxford: Clarendon, 1963.Google Scholar
Nowak, Edward. Le chrétien devant la souffrance. Étude sur la pensée de Jean Chrysostome. Paris: Beauchesne, 1972.Google Scholar
Nünlist, René. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Nünlist, René. ‘Some Ancient Views on Narrative, Its Structure and Working’. Pages 103–36 in Defining Greek Narrative. Edited by Cairns, Douglas and Scodel, Ruth. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, John J. ‘“A Letter That Killeth”: Toward a Reassessment of Antiochene Exegesis, or Diodore, Theodore, and Theodoret on the Psalms’. JECS 8, no. 1 (2000): 83–103.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, John J., and Reno, R. R.. Sanctified Vision: An Introduction to Early Christian Interpretation of the Bible. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ondrey, Hauna T. The Minor Prophets as Christian Scripture in the Commentaries of Theodore of Mopsuestia and Cyril of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Pagels, Elaine H. ‘The Politics of Paradise: Augustine’s Exegesis of Genesis 1–3 versus that of John Chrysostom’. HTR 78, nos. 1–2 (1985): 67–99.Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, Thalia. ‘Tradition and Invention in the Greek Tragic Scholia: Some Examples of Terminology’. Studi italiani di filologia classica 16, no. 2 (1998): 214–22.Google Scholar
Parry, Ken. ‘Fate, Free Choice, and Divine Providence from the Neoplatonists to John of Damascus’. Pages 341–60 in The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Edited by Kaldellis, Anthony and Siniossoglou, Niketas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Perkins, Judith. The Suffering Self: Pain and Narrative Representation in the Early Christian Era. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Pigott, Justin M. ‘Capital Crimes: Deconstructing John’s “Unnecessary Severity” in Managing the Clergy at Constantinople’. Pages 733–78 in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives. Edited by de Wet, Chris and Mayer, Wendy. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Pigott, Justin M. New Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day: Rethinking Councils and Controversy at Early Constantinople 381–451. Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Samuel. ‘Numbering the Heaven(s): John Chrysostom’s Use of Greek Exegetical Traditions for Interpreting Gen 1,6–8 (Hom. Gen. IV)’. ETL 92, no. 2 (2016): 203–28.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Samuel. ‘Representing the Jews: John Chrysostom’s Use of Exegetical and Theological Traditions for Gen 1:26a (In Gen. hom. 8)’. Pages 105–25 in Light on Creation: Ancient Commentators in Dialogue and Debate on the Origin of the World. Edited by Roskam, Geert and Verheyden, Joseph. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Samuel. ‘Reading Plato through the Eyes of Eusebius: John Chrysostom’s Timaeus Quotations in Rhetorical Context’. Pages 464–92 in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives. Edited by de Wet, Chris L. and Mayer, Wendy. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Price, Bennet J. ‘Paradeigma and Exemplum in Ancient Rhetorical Theory’. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1975.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. Morphology of the Folktale. Translated by Laurence Scott. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Puech, Aimé. Un réformateur de la société chrétienne au IVe siècle: St Jean Chrysostome et les moeurs de son temps. Paris: Hachette, 1891.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. Christian Doctrine of Apokatastasis: A Critical Assessment from the New Testament to Eriugena. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Reuling, Hanneke. ‘The Christian and the Rabbinic Adam: Genesis Rabbah and Patristic Exegesis of Gen 3:17–19’. Pages 63–74 in The Exegetical Encounter between Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity. Edited by Grypeou, Emmanouela and Spurling, Helen. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols, 1999.Google Scholar
Richter, Gerhard. Oikonomia: Der Gebrauch des Wortes Oikonomia im Neuen Testament, bei den Kirchenvätern und in der theologischen Literatur bis in 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Roosien, Mark. ‘“Emulate Their Mystical Order”: Awe and Liturgy in John Chrysostom’s Angelic πολιτεία’. StPatr 83 (2017): 115–30.Google Scholar
Roueché, Charlotte. ‘Theodosius II, the Cities, and the Date of the “Church History” of Sozomen’. JTS 37, no. 1 (1986): 130–32.Google Scholar
Rylaarsdam, David M. ‘On Earth as If in Heaven: John Chrysostom on Christ, Priests, and the Making of Angels’. StPatr 47 (2010): 237–41.Google Scholar
Rylaarsdam, David M. John Chrysostom on Divine Pedagogy: The Coherence of His Theology and Preaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sacks, Kenneth. Polybius on the Writing of History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Sandwell, Isabella. ‘How to Teach Genesis 1:1–19: John Chrysostom and Basil of Caesarea on the Creation of the World’. JECS 19, no. 4 (2011): 539–64.Google Scholar
Schatkin, Margaret A. John Chrysostom as Apologist: With Special Reference to De Incomprehensibili, Quod Nemo Laeditur, Ad Eos Qui Scandalizati Sunt, and Adversus Oppugnatores Vitae Monasticae. Thessaloniki: Patriarchikon Hidryma Paterikōn Meletōn, 1987.Google Scholar
Schatkin, Margaret A. ‘John Chrysostom: Advocate of Biblical Literacy’. Pages 829–38 in Historiam perscrutari: Miscellanea di studi offerti al prof. Ottorino Pasquato. Edited by Poupard, Paul and Maritano, Mario. Rome: LAS, 2002.Google Scholar
Schäublin, Christoph. Untersuchungen zu Methode und Herkunft der antiochenischen Exegese. Cologne: Hanstein, 1974.Google Scholar
Schiwietz, Stefan. ‘Die Eschatologie des hl. Johannes Chrysostomus in ihr Verhältnis zu der origenistischen’. Der Katholik 4, no. 12 (1913): 445–55; 4, no. 13 (1914): 45–63, 200–16, 271–81, 370–79, 436–48.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. ‘Cardinal Virtues: A Contested Socratic Inheritance’. Pages 11–28 in Plato and the Stoics. Edited by Long, A. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Schor, Adam M. ‘Theodoret on the “School of Antioch”: A Network Approach’. JECS 15, no. 4 (2007): 517–62.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeremy M. Christianity, Empire, and the Making of Religion in Late Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. Consoling Heliodorus: A Commentary on Jerome, Letter 60. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. ‘Towards a Genre of Consolation’. Pages 1–36 in Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife. Edited by Baltussen, Han. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2013.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. ‘Nemesius of Emesa and Some Theories of Divine Providence’. VC 37, no. 2 (1983): 141–56.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. ‘Threefold Providence: The History and Background of a Doctrine’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement, 78: Ancient approaches to Plato’s Timaeus (2003): 107–27.Google Scholar
Signifredi, Massimiliano. ‘La scrittura fondamento di una nuova cultura: alcune osservazioni sugli “exempla” biblici delle de Lazaro contiones di Giovanni Crisostomo (CPG 4329)’. Studi e Materiali di Storia delle Religioni 32, no. 1 (2008): 127–57.Google Scholar
Simonetti, Manlio. Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church: An Historical Introduction to Patristic Exegesis. Translated by John A. Hughes, Anders Bergquist, Markus A. Bockmuehl, and William Horbury. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Warren. ‘The Body of Paradise and the Body of the Resurrection: Gender and the Angelic Life in Gregory of Nyssa’s De hominis opificio’. HTR 99, no. 2 (2006): 207–28.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Spilsbury, Paul. ‘Flavius Josephus on the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire’. JTS 54, no. 1 (2003): 1–24.Google Scholar
Stadter, Philip. ‘Biography and History’. Pages 528–40 in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Volume 2. Edited by Marincola, John. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Stander, H. F. ‘Chrysostom’s Interpretation of the Narrative of the Three Confessors in the Fiery Furnace’. Acta Patristica et Byzantina 16 (2005): 91–105.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Meir. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Stewart, Columba. ‘Evagrius Ponticus and the Eight Generic Logismoi’. Pages 3–34 in In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages. Edited by Newhauser, Richard. Toronto: PIMS, 2005.Google Scholar
Straw, Carole. ‘Chrysostom’s Martyrs: Zealous Athletes and the Dangers of Sloth’. Pages 521–54 in Giovanni Crisostomo: Oriente e Occidente tra IV e V secolo, XXXIII Incontro di Studiosi dell’Antichità Cristiana, Augustinianum 6–8 maggio 2004, Roma. Rome: Augustinianum, 2005.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Francis Aloysius. The Christology of Theodore of Mopsuestia. Rome: Gregoriana, 1956.Google Scholar
Telfer, William. ‘The Fourth Century Fathers as Exegetes’. HTR 50, no. 2 (1957): 91–105.Google Scholar
Thierry, Amédée. St Jean Chrysostome et l’impératrice Eudoxie: la société chrétienne en Orient. Paris: Perrin, 1872.Google Scholar
Tiersch, Claudia. Johannes Chrysostomus in Konstantinopel (398–404). Weltsicht und Wirken eines Bischofs in der Hauptstadt des Oströmischen Reiches. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar
Tonias, Demetrios E. Abraham in the Works of John Chrysostom. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar
Tonias, Demetrios E. ‘The Iconic Abraham as John Chrysostom’s High Priest of Philanthropy’. Pages 563–86 in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives. Edited by Mayer, Wendy and De Wet, Chris L.. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Turpin, William. ‘Stoic Exempla, and the Praecipuum munus annalium’. Classical Antiquity 27, no. 2 (2008): 359–404.Google Scholar
Uleyn, Arnold. ‘La doctrine morale de saint Jean Chrysostome dans le Commentaire sur saint Matthieu et ses affinités avec la diatribe’. Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 27, nos. 1–2 (1957): 6–25, 99–140.Google Scholar
van de Paverd, Frans. St. John Chrysostom, The Homilies on the Statues: An Introduction. Rome: Orientalium, 1991.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, Peter. Un héritage de paix et de piété: étude sur les histoires ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomène. Leuven: Peeters, 2004.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, Peter. ‘Palladius and the Johannite Schism’. JEH 64, no. 1 (2013): 1–19.Google Scholar
van Ommeslaeghe, Florent. ‘La valeur historique de la Vie de S. Jean Chrysostome attribuée à Martyrius d’Antioche (BHG 871)’. StPatr 12 (1975): 478–83.Google Scholar
Van Seters, John. Abraham in History and Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, Bruno H. ‘Les raisons de souffrir d’après saint Jean Chrysostome’. La vie spirituelle 100 (1959): 187–206.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, Bruno H. Saint Jean Chrysostome et la parole de Dieu. Paris: Cerf, 1961.Google Scholar
Ventura Da Silva, Gilvan. ‘Os limites da basileia segundo João Crisóstomo: reflexões sobre o tratado “Uma comparação entre o rei e o monge”’. Antíteses 8, no. 16 (2016): 130–48.Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul. ‘La providence stoïcienne intervient-elle dans l’histoire?’. Latomus 49, no. 3 (1990): 553–74.Google Scholar
Voicu, Sever J. ‘Le prime traduzioni latine di Crisostomo’. Pages 392–415 in Cristianesimo latino e cultura greca sino al sec. IV: XXI Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana; Roma, 7–9 maggio 1992. Rome: Augustinianum, 1993.Google Scholar
Voicu, Sever J. ‘Seconde spigolature pseudocrisostomiche’. Bollettino della Badia Greca di Grottaferrata 14 (2017): 315–17.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, D. S. Christian Antioch: A Study of Early Christian Thought in the East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Wallraff, Martin. Der Kirchenhistoriker Sokrates: Untersuchungen zu Geschichtsdarstellung, Methode und Person. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997.Google Scholar
Wallraff, Martin. ‘The Beginnings of Christian Universal History from Tatian to Julius Africanus’. ZAC 14, no. 3 (2011): 540–55.Google Scholar
Wayman, Benjamin D. Diodore the Theologian: Pronoia in His Commentary on Psalms 1–50. Turnhout: Brepols, 2014.Google Scholar
Wilcoxson, Jonathan P. ‘The Machinery of Consolation in John Chrysostom’s Letters to Olympias’. StPatr 83 (2017): 37–72.Google Scholar
Wilken, Robert L. John Chrysostom and the Jews: Rhetoric and Reality in the Late Fourth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Wright, Jessica. ‘Between Despondency and the Demon: Diagnosing and Treating Spiritual Disorders in John Chrysostom’s Letter to Stageirios’. JLA 8, no. 2 (2015): 352–67.Google Scholar
Wytzes, Jelle. ‘Paideia and Pronoia in the Works of Clemens Alexandrinus’. VC 9, no. 2 (1955): 148–58.Google Scholar
Young, Frances M. ‘The Rhetorical Schools and Their Influence on Patristic Exegesis’. Pages 182–99 in The Making of Orthodoxy: Essays in Honour of Henry Chadwick. Edited by Williams, Rowan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Young, Frances M. ‘Typology’. Pages 29–48 in Crossing the Boundaries: Essays in Biblical Interpretation in Honour of Michael D. Goulder. Edited by Porter, Stanley E., Joyce, Paul, and Orton, David E.. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Young, Frances M. Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Young, Frances M. ‘Interpretation of Scripture’. Pages 845–63 in The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Edited by Harvey, Susan Ashbrook and Hunter, David G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Zecher, Jonathan L. ‘The Angelic Life in Desert and Ladder: John Climacus’s Re-formulation of Ascetic Spirituality’. JECS 21, no. 1 (2013): 111–36.Google Scholar
Žitnik, Maksimilijan. ‘ΘΕΟΣ ΦΙΛΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΣ bei Johannes Chrysostomus’. OCP 41 (1975): 76–118.Google Scholar