Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:10:53.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2020

Edited by
Pavel Gregorić  and
George Karamanolis
Pavel Gregorić
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy in Zagreb, Croatia
George Karamanolis
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Pseudo-Aristotle: De Mundo (On the Cosmos)
A Commentary
 , pp. 231 - 242
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Capelle, W. 1907. Die Schrift Von der Welt: Ein Weltbild im Umriss aus dem 1. Jahrhundert nach Chr. (Jena: Diedrichs).Google Scholar
Federspiel, M. 2018. Pseudo-Aristote, Du monde. Positions et dénominations des vents. Des plantes (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. 1949. La Révélation d’Hermès Trismégiste, vol. 2: Le Dieu cosmique (Paris: Lecoffre).Google Scholar
Forster, E. S. 1914. Aristotle, De mundo. The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, vol. 3 (Oxford: Clarendon Press); revised by Barnes, J (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), 626–40.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. 1955. Aristotle: On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. On the Cosmos (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Gohlke, P. 1949. Aristoteles an König Alexander über die Welt (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar
Kap, J. C. 1792. Aristotelis De mundo liber (Altenburg: Richter).Google Scholar
Lorimer, W. L. 1933. Aristotelis qui fertur libellus de mundo (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Reale, G. 1974. Aristotele: Trattato sul Cosmo per Alessandro (Naples: Loffredo).Google Scholar
Reale, G. and Bos, A. P. 1995. Il trattato Sul cosmo per Alessandro attribuito ad Aristotele (Milan: Vita e Pensiero).Google Scholar
Schönberger, O. 1991. Aristoteles: Über die Welt (Stuttgart: Reclam).Google Scholar
Strohm, H. 1970. Aristoteles: Meteorologie. Über die Welt (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2014. Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Tricot, J. 1949. Aristote: Traité du ciel. Suivi du traité pseudo-aristotélicien Du monde (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adamson, P. 2015. ‘State of Nature: Human and Cosmic Rulership in Ancient Philosophy’, in Kellner, B and Höfele, A (eds.), Menschennatur und politische Ordnung (Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink), 79–94.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 1988. ‘The Early Stoics on the Immobility and Coherence of the Cosmos’, Phronesis 33, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. 1995. Concepts of Space in Greek Thought (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1996. Alexis: The Fragments. A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Audi, R. (ed.) 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1966. Strabon et la science de son temps: Les sciences du monde (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1969. Strabon, Géographie, Tome I, 2e partie (Livre 2) (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1972. ‘Les Traités “Sur l’Océan” et les Zones Terrestres’, Revue des Études Anciennes 74, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. 1958. ‘The Eunuch Bagoas’, Classical Quarterly 8, 144–57.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1977. ‘Review of G. Reale, Trattato sul Cosmo per Alessandro’, Classical Review 27, 40–3.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Beare, J. I. 1906. Greek Theories of Elemental Cognition from Alcmaeon to Aristotle (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. 2006. Faire usage: La pratique du stoïcisme (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. 2009. ‘How Industrious Can Zeus Be? The Extent and Objects of Divine Activity in Stoicism’, in Salles, R (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, H. 1880. Die geographische Fragmente des Eratosthenes (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Berger, H. 1903. Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Erdkunde der Griechen (Leipzig: Veit).Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2004. Poetae epici Graeci: Testimonia et fragmenta, vol. 2.1: Orphicorum et Orphicis similium testimonia et fragmenta (München–Leipzig: Saur).Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2010. ‘El Himno a Zeus Órfico: Vicisitudes literarias, ideológicas y religiosas’, in Bernabé, A, Casadesús, F, Santamaría, M. A. (eds.), Orfeo y el orfismo: Nuevas perspectivas (Alicante), www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/orfeo-y-el-orfismo-nuevas-perspectivas–0/ (last accessed 1 March 2019), 67–97.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2003. ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’, Phronesis 48, 344–69.Google Scholar
Besnier, B. 2003. ‘De mundo: Tradition grecque’, Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Supplément, 478–80.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2004. The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Betegh, G. and Gregorić, P. 2014. ‘Multiple Analogy in Ps.Aristotle, De mundo Ch. 6’, Classical Quarterly 64, 574–91.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 1997. ‘Per la datazione del Περὶ ὠκεανοῦ di Pitea di Massalia’, Sileno 23, 73–85.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 1998. Pitea di Massalia: L’Oceano (Pisa–Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali).Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 2011. ‘I Greci e il “mare esterno”: dalle esplorazioni delle aree estreme alla rappresentazione “scientifica” dell’ecumene’, in Santos Yanguas, J and Díaz Ariño, B (eds.), Los griegos y el mar (Vitoria–Gasteiz: Universidad del País Vasco), 155–72.Google Scholar
Biffi, N. 2009. L’Anatolia Meridionale in Strabone: Libro XIV della Geografia (Bari: Edipuglia).Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bodéüs, R. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of Living Immortals (New York: SUNY Press).Google Scholar
Bodnár, I. 2002. ‘Eudemus’ Unmoved Movers: Fragments 121–123b’, in Bodnár, I and Fortenbaugh, W (eds.), Eudemus of Rhodes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), 171–89.Google Scholar
Bolchert, P. 1908. Aristoteles Erdkunde von Asien und Libyen (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Boot, P. 1981. ‘An Indication for the Date of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Treatise De mundo’, Mnemosyne 34, 139–40.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. 1978. ‘Review of G. Reale, Trattato sul Cosmo per Alessandro’, Vigiliae Christianae 32, 66–9.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. 1991. ‘Supplementary Notes on the De mundo’, Hermes 119, 312–32.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1970. ‘Aristotle and Callisthenes’, Historia 19, 407–13.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 1997. ‘Locating the Cosmos: An Academic Argument against Chrysippus’, Mnemosyne 50, 577–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. 1995. Orphée et l’Orphisme dans l’Antiquité gréco-romaine (Aldershot: Variorum), no. IV: ‘Orphée et l’orphisme à l’époque impériale: Témoignage et intéprétation philosophique, de Plutarque à Jamblique’; no. V: ‘Damascius et l’orphisme’.Google Scholar
Broche, G. 1935. Pythéas le Massaliote, découvreur de l’Extrême-Occident et du Nord de l’Europe (IVe siècle av. J. C.) (Paris: Société française d’imprimerie et de librerie).Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 1994. Dionysios von Alexandria: Das Lied von der Welt. Zweisprachige Ausgabe von Kai Brodersen (Hildesheim–Zurich–New York: Olms).Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2000. ‘Patrokles [3]’, Der neue Pauly, vol. 9, 418.Google Scholar
Bucciantini, V. 2002. ‘L’isola del Sole nel Periplo di Nearco: Problemi d’identificazione e rappresentazione’, Orbis Terrarum 8, 49–58.Google Scholar
Bucciantini, V. 2015. Studio su Nearco di Creta. Dalla descrizione geografica alla narrazione storica (Alessandria: Orso).Google Scholar
Bunbury, E. H. 1959. A History of Ancient Geography, 2 vols. (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Boston: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion, trans. Raffan, J (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Burri, R. 2014. ‘The Geography of De mundo’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 89–106.Google Scholar
Callieri, P. 2001. ‘La presunta via commerciale tra l’India e Roma attraverso l’Oxus e il Mar Caspio: Nuovi dati di discussione’, Topoi 11, 537–46.Google Scholar
Capelle, W. 1905. ‘Die Schrift Von der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen Popularphilosophie’, Neue Jahrbücher für das Klassische Altertum 15, 529–68.Google Scholar
Cataudella, M. R. 2003. ‘Aristotele e la paternità del De mundo: Aspetti del pensiero geografico (3, 392b)’, in ΕΡΚΟΣ: Studi in onore di Franco Sartori (Padua: Sargon), 63–71.Google Scholar
Chandler, C. 2014. ‘Didactic Purpose and Discursive Strategies in On the Cosmos’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 69–87.Google Scholar
Chiesara, M. L. 2001. Aristocles of Messene: Testimonies and Fragments (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2003. Hesiod’s Cosmos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Conche, M. 1998. Héraclite: Fragments, 4th ed. (Paris: Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Cumont, F. 1935. ‘Les noms des planètes et l’astrolatrie chez les Grecs’, L’Antiquité Classique 4, 5–43.Google Scholar
Daffinà, P. 1968. ‘Aral, Caspio, Tanais’, Rivista degli studi orientali 43, 363–78.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 2013. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1904. ‘Laterculi alexandrini aus einem Papyrus ptolemäischer Zeit’, Abhandlungen der königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. 1997. ‘Die Geographie der Schrift vom Kosmos’, Geographia antiqua 6, 5–12.Google Scholar
Diller, A. 1949. ‘Measurements of the Earth’, Isis 40, 6–9.Google Scholar
Dion, R. 1977. Aspectes politiques de la géographie antique (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 1982. Il buon re secondo Omero (Naples: Bibliopolis).Google Scholar
du Toit, D. 2015. ‘Δυναμις εἰς σωτηρίαν: Röm 1,16 und Pseudo-Aristoteles De mundo 6, 398b 6–10 im Horizont antiker Diskurse über Entstehung, Bedrohung und Erhaltung der Welt’, in Breytenbach, C (ed.), Paul’s Graeco-Roman Context (Leuven–Paris: Peeters), 457–70.Google Scholar
Duhot, J. 1990. ‘Aristotélisme et Stoicisme dans le Περὶ κόσμου pseudo-aristotélicienne’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 8, 191–228.Google Scholar
Düring, I. 1944. Aristotle’s Chemical Treatise: Meteorologica Book IV, with Introduction and Commentary (Göteborg: Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 50).Google Scholar
Eastwood, B. S. 1992. ‘Heraclides and Heliocentrism: Texts, Diagrams, and Interpretations’, Journal for the History of Astronomy 23/4, 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. 1988. Posidonius, vol. 1: The Fragments; vol. 2: The Commentary: (i) Testimonia and Fragments 1–149; (ii) Fragments 150–293 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ehlers, W. W. 1985. ‘Mit dem Südwestmonsun nach Ceylon: Eine Interpretation der Iambul-Exzerpte Diodors’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumwissenschaft 11, 73–84.Google Scholar
Endsjø, D. Ø. 1997. ‘Placing the Unplaceable: The Making of Apollonius’ Argonautic Geography’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 38, 373–85.Google Scholar
Engels, D. W. 1978. Alexander the Great and the Logistics of the Macedonian Army (Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Fabre, P. 1975. ‘Étude sur Pythéas le Massaliote et l’époque de ses travaux’, Les Études Classiques 43, 25–44.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (eds.) 2002. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Fronterotta, R. 2013. Eraclito: Frammenti (Milan: BUR).Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. 1956. ‘The Early History of the Concept of Soul’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
Galzerano, M. 2018. ‘Misquoting Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrranus: A New Proof of the Inauthenticity of Ps.-Aristotle, On the Cosmos’, Classical Quarterly 68, 733–5.Google Scholar
Gernez, D. 1941. ‘Les périples des anciens grecs et leurs rapports avec les livres d’instructions nautiques’, Academie de Marine Belgique 4, 1–19.Google Scholar
Geus, K., 2000. ‘Utopie und Geographie: Zum Weltbild der Griechen in frühhellenistischer Zeit’, Orbis terrarum 6, 55–90.Google Scholar
Geus, K. 2002. Eratosthenes von Kyrene: Studien zur hellenistischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Munich: C. H. Beck).Google Scholar
Geus, K. 2004. ‘Measuring the Earth and the Oikoumene’, in Talbert, R and Brodersen, K (eds.), Space in the Roman World: Its Perception and Presentation (Münster: LIT Verlag), 11–26.Google Scholar
Gilbert, O. 1907. Die meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Gisinger, F. 1921. Die Erdbeschreibung des Eudoxos von Knidos (Leipzig–Berlin: Teubner).Google Scholar
Gisinger, F. 1937. ‘Periplus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 19.1, 841–50.Google Scholar
Gisinger, F. 1949. ‘Patrokles 5’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 18.4, 2263–73.Google Scholar
Gohlke, P. 1936. ‘Aristoteles an Alexander über das Weltall’, Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung 12, 323–35.Google Scholar
González Ponce, F. J. 1995. Avieno y el periplo (Écija: Editorial Gráficas Sol).Google Scholar
González Ponce, F. J. 1998. ‘El corpus periplográfico griego y sus integrantes más antiguos: Épocas arcaica y clásica’, in Pérez Jiménez, A and Cruz, G Andreotti (eds.), Los límites de la tierra: El espacio geográfico en las culturas mediterráneas (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas), 41–76.Google Scholar
González Ponce, F. J. 2008. Periplógrafos griegos I. Épocas Arcaica y Clásica 1: Periplo de Hanón y autores de los siglos VI y V a.C. (Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias).Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. 1987. ‘Aristotelian Philosophy in the Roman World from the Time of Cicero to the End of the Second Century a.d.’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36.2, 1079–174.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. 2016. ‘Review of J. C. Thom (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos’, Classical Review 66, 68–70.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. 2020. ‘The Origin and the Instrument of Animal Motion: De motu animalium Chapters 9–10’, in Rapp, C and Primavesi, O (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Proceedings of the XIXth Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. and Kuhar, M. 2014. ‘Aristotle’s Physiology of Animal Motion: On Neura and Muscles’, Apeiron 47, 94–115.Google Scholar
Guggenberger, R. 2016. Kritische Edition der Zitate aus und Allusionen auf Homer, Aischylos, Sophokles und Euripides bei Aristoteles, samt Kommentaren und quantitativer Auswertung (Doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna).Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 2004. Le Voile d’Isis: Essai sur l’histoire de l’idée de Nature (Paris: Gallimard); The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature, trans. M. Chase (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hahm, H. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar
Hall, C. M. 1923. Nicolaus of Damascus’ Life of Augustus: A Historical Commentary Embodying a Translation (Menasha, WI: George Banta).Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. R. 1971. ‘Alexander and the Aral’, Classical Quarterly 21, 106–111.Google Scholar
Happ, H. 1968. ‘Weltbild und Seinslehre bei Aristoteles’, Antike und Abendland 14, 72–91.Google Scholar
Hebert, B. 1986. ‘Attische Gelehrsamkeit in einem alexandrinischen Papyrus? Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zu den Künstlerkanones der Laterculi Alexandrini’, Tyche 1, 127–31.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A. 1937. The Frame of the Ancient Greek Maps (New York: American Geographical Society).Google Scholar
Heilen, S. 2000. ‘Eudoxos von Knidos und Pytheas von Massalia’, in Hübner, W (ed.), Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften in der Antike, vol. 2: Geographie und verwandte Wissenschaften (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2005. ‘Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy’, Phronesis 50, 1–42.Google Scholar
Hladký, V. (ed.) 2011. Papyrus Derveni (Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart).Google Scholar
Holwerda, D. 1993. ‘Textkritisches und Exegetisches zur pseudo-Aristotelischen Schrift Περὶ τοῦ κόσμου’, Mnemosyne 46, 46–55.Google Scholar
Horák, B. 1931. La question de la connaissance du lac d’Aral dans l’antiquité (Brno: Spisy odboru Československé společnosti zeměpisné v Brně).Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 1993. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Humboldt, A. von 1848. Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, vol. 1, trans. Otté, E. C. (London: Henry G. Bohn).Google Scholar
Humboldt, A. von 1852. Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, vol. 4, trans. Otté, E. C. and Paul, B. H. (London: Henry G. Bohn).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1995. ‘Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phaenomena of Aratus’, Arachnion 2, 1–34.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2005. ‘Empedocles on Colours and Colour Vision’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, 1–37.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2011. ‘Remarks on the History of an Ancient Thought Experiment’, in Ierodiakonou, K and Roux, S (eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts (Leiden: Brill), 37–49.Google Scholar
Ilyushechkina, E. 2010. Studien zu Dionysios von Alexandria (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen).Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 1990. La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d’Alexandrie ou la leçon de géographie (Paris: Albin Michel).Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1923. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2008. ‘Reconstructing (Again) the Opening of the Derveni Papyrus’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 166, 37–51.Google Scholar
Janni, P. 1984. La mappa e il periplo: Cartografia antica e spazio odologico (Rome: Bretschneider).Google Scholar
Janni, P. 1996. Il mare degli antichi (Bari: Dedalo).Google Scholar
Janni, P. 2016. ‘The Sea of the Greeks and Romans’, in Bianchetti, S, Cataudella, M. R. and Gehrke, H. J (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Geography. The Inhabited World in Greek and Roman Tradition (Leiden–Boston: Brill), 21–42.Google Scholar
Jensen, P. J. and Waszink, J. H. (eds.) 1975. Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. 1926. ‘Posidonius and the Flight of the Mind through the Universe’, Classical Philology 21, 97–113.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Karttunen, K. 1997. India and the Hellenistic World (Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society).Google Scholar
Keaney, J. J. and Lamberton, R. (eds.) 1996. [Plutarch]: Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer (Atlanta: Scholars Press).Google Scholar
Keyser, P. T. 2001. ‘The Geographical Work of Dikaiarchos’, in Fortehbaugh, W. W. and Schütrumpf, E (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation and Discussion (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
Keyser, P. T. 2009. ‘Heliocentrism in or out of Heraclides’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Pender, E. E. (eds.), Heraclides of Pontus: discussion (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers), 205–35.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. A. 1997. Aratus: Phaenomena (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. 1978. ‘Philosophy and Science in Posidonius’, Antike und Abendland 24, 7–15.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. 1988. Posidonius, vol. 2: The Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. 1992. ‘Theophrastus’ Meteorology, Aristotle and Posidonius’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1954. Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kotwick, M. E. 2017. Der Papyrus von Derveni (Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T., Parássoglou, G. and Tsantsanoglou, K. (eds.) 2006. The Derveni Papyrus (Florence: Olschki).Google Scholar
Kragh, H. 1999. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kraye, J. 1990. ‘Aristotle’s God and the Authenticity of De mundo: An Early Modern Controversy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 28, 339–58.Google Scholar
Kraye, J. 2014. ‘Disputes over the Authorship of De mundo between Humanism and Altertumwissenschaft’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 181–97.Google Scholar
Larson, J. 2007. Ancient Greek Cults: A Guide (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. 1966. Eudoxos von Knidos (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 2014. Dionysius Periegetes, Description of the Known World: With Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1983. The Justice of Zeus, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lorimer, W. L. 1924. The Text Tradition of Pseudo-Aristotle “De mundo” (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lorimer, W. L. 1925. Some Notes on the Text of Pseudo-Aristotle “De mundo” (Oxford: Humphrey Milford).Google Scholar
Magnani, S. 1995. ‘Le isole occidentali e l’itinerario piteano’, Sileno 21, 83–102.Google Scholar
Magnani, S. 2002. Il viaggio di Pitea sull’ Oceano (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar
Maguire, J. P. 1939. ‘The Sources of Pseudo-Aristotle De mundo’, Yale Classical Studies 6, 111–67.Google Scholar
Mair, G. R. 1955. Callimachus: Hymns and Epigrams. Lycophron. Aratus (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1991. ‘Two Attributions’, Classical Quarterly 41, 541–4.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1992. ‘ΠΕΡΙ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ: A Note on the History of a Title’, Vigiliae Christianae 46, 391–411.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. 2001. Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary, 2nd ed. (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar
Martin, A. and Primavesi, O. 1999. L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (Strasbourg–Berlin–New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1998. Aratos: Phénomènes, 2 vols (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
McDiarmid, J. B. 1940. ‘Theophrastus on the Eternity of the World’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 71, 239–47.Google Scholar
McPhail, C. and Hannah, R. 2008–11. ‘Eratosthenes’ Perception of the Caspian Sea: A Gulf or an Inland Sea?’, Orbis Terrarum 10, 155–72.Google Scholar
Medas, S. 2004. De rebus nauticis: L’ arte della navigazione nel mondo antico (Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider).Google Scholar
Meineke, A. 1852. Vindiciarum strabonianarum liber (Berlin: Nicolai).Google Scholar
Milne, H. J. M. 1934. Greek Shorthand Manuals: Syllabary and Commentary (London: Egypt Exploration Society).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1984. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, vol. 2 (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (ed.) 2007. Hesiod: Theogony. Works and Days. Testimonia (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Muñoz Pascual, A. 2012. Estudios sobre la Descripción de la tierra habitada de Dionisio el Periegeta (Doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia).Google Scholar
Nagle, D. B. 2006. The Household as the Foundation of Aristotle’s Polis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. 1975. A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy (Berlin–New York: Springer).Google Scholar
Nock, A. D. 1931. ‘Kornutus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband 5, cols. 995–1005.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1893. ‘Beitrage zur Geschichte der Griechischen Philosophie’, no. V: ‘Über den Streit des Theophrast und Zeno bei Philo’, Jahrbücher für Classische Philologie, Supplementband 19, 440–52.Google Scholar
Onnasch, E.-O. 1996. ‘Die Aitherlehre in De mundo und ihre Aristotelizität’, Hermes 124, 170–91.Google Scholar
Pallí Bonet, J. 1992. Aristóteles: Investigación sobre los animales (Madrid: Gredos).Google Scholar
Pearson, L. 1951. ‘Notes on Two Passages of Strabo’, Classical Quarterly 1 (N.S.), 80–5.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. 1960. The Lost Histories of Alexander the Great (New York: American Philological Association).Google Scholar
Pecker, J. and Kaufman, S. 2001. Understanding the Heavens: Thirty Centuries of Astronomical Ideas from Ancient Thinking to Modern Cosmology (Berlin–London: Springer).Google Scholar
Pender, E. E. 2000. Images of Persons Unseen: Plato’s Metaphors for the Gods and the Soul (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar
Philippson, R. 1931. ‘Athenodoros’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband 5, cols. 47–55.Google Scholar
Piano, V. 2013. ‘ Ὀλυμπος καὶ χρόνος τὸ αὐτό: Sulle tracce del tempo nel papiro di Derveni’, in Di Donato, R (ed.), Origini e svolgimento del pensiero greco: Studi per Jean-Pierre Vernant (Pisa: Edizioni ETS), 49–67.Google Scholar
Piano, V. 2016. Il papiro di Derveni tra religione e filosofia (Florence: Olschki).Google Scholar
Platnauer, M. 1921. ‘Greek Colour-Perception’, Classical Quarterly 15, 153–62.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1948. Die Stoa, vol. 1 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Prandi, L. 1985. Callistene: Uno storico tra Aristotele e i re macedoni (Milan: JACA).Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2008. Empedokles Physika I (Berlin–New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Prontera, F. 2007–8. ‘Centro e periferia nei mappamondi greci’, Geographia antiqua 16–17, 177–87.Google Scholar
Quandt, W. 1955. Orphei hymni (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (ed.) 2003. Anneo Cornuto: Compendio di teologia greca (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. and Luccheti, G. 2004. Allegoria, vol. 1: L’età classica (Milan: Vita e pensiero).Google Scholar
Raschieri, A. A. 2004. Dionigi d’Alessandria, il Periegeta: Guida delle Terre Abitate (Alessandria: Edizioni dell’ Orso).Google Scholar
Rathmann, M. 2007. ‘Wahrnehmung und Erfassung geographischer Räume im Hellenismus am Beispiel Asiens’, in Rathmann, M (ed.), Wahrnehmung und Erfassung geographischer Räume in der Antike (Mainz: Von Zabern), 81–102.Google Scholar
Rehm, A. 1916. Griechische Windrosen (Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philos.-philol. und hist. Kl.).Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1912. ‘Hekataios von Abdera und Demokrit’, Hermes 47, 492–513.Google Scholar
Ricciardelli, G. 2009. ‘Zeus, primo e ultimo’, Paideia 64, 423–35.Google Scholar
Ringshausen, K. W. 1929. Poseidonios–Asklepiodot–Seneca und ihre Anschauungen über Erdbeben und Vulkane (Doctoral dissertation, University of Munich).Google Scholar
Roller, D. W. 2010. Eratosthenes’ Geography: Fragments Collected and Translated, with Commentary and Additional Material (Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Romm, J. 1994. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought: Geography, Exploration, and Fiction (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Roseman, C. H. 1990. Pytheas of Massalia: On the Ocean (Chicago: Ares).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1949. Aristotle, 5th revised ed. (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
Ruge, W. 1895. ‘Arabicus sinus’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 2.1, cols. 362–3.Google Scholar
Sanz Morales, M. 1993. ‘Las citas homéricas contenidas en el tratado De mundo, atribuido a Aristóteles, prueba de su inautenticidad’, Vichiana 4, 38–47.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. 1991. ‘Language and Style of the Aristotelian De mundo in Relation to the Question of its Inauthenticity’, Elenchos 12, 221–55.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2000. ‘Metaphysics Λ 10’, in Frede, M and Charles, D (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 327–50.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. 2001. ‘Aristotelian Theology after Aristotle’, in Frede, D and Laks, A (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath (Leiden: Brill), 1–40.Google Scholar
Shipton, K. M. W. 1985. ‘Heraclitus fr. 10: A Musical Interpretation’ Phronesis 30, 111–30.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 2014. ‘The Reception of On the Cosmos in Ancient Pagan Philosophy’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 121–31.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. M. 1984. ‘The Harmonia of the Bow and the Lyre in Heraclitus Fr. 51 (DK)’, Phronesis 29, 91–5.Google Scholar
Stähelin, F. 1921. ‘Seleukos 2’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 2.A.1, cols. 1208, 1234.Google Scholar
Strohm, H. 1952. ‘Studien zur Schrift von der Welt’, Museum Helveticum 9, 137–75.Google Scholar
Strohm, H. 1987. ‘Ps. Aristoteles De mundo und Theilers Posidonius’, Wiener Studien 100, 69–84.Google Scholar
Stroux, J. 1933. ‘Die stoische Beurteilung Alexanders des Grossen’, Philologus 88, 222–40.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. 1893. Recherches sur l’histoire de l’astronomie ancienne (Paris: Gauthier-Villars).Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. 1938. The Greeks in Bactria and India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. 1948. Alexander the Great, vol. 2: Sources and Studies (Cambridge–London–New York–Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Taub, L. 2003. Ancient Meteorology (London–New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Theiler, W. 1982. Poseidonios: Die Fragmente, 2 vols (Berlin–New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2012. ‘Popular Philosophy in the Hellenistic-Roman World’, Early Christianity 3, 279–95.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2014a. ‘The Cosmotheology of De mundo’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 107–20.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2015. ‘Paul and Popular Philosophy’, in Breytenbach, C (ed.), Paul’s Graeco-Roman Context (Leuven–Paris: Peeters), 47–74.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. W. 1918. ‘The Greek Winds’, Classical Review 32, 49–56.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. O. 1948. History of Ancient Geography (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Torallas Tovar, S. and Worp, K. A. 2006. To the Origins of Greek Stenography (Barcelona: Abadia de Montserrat/Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas).Google Scholar
Tsabari, I. 1990. Διονυσίου Ἀλεξανδρέως Οἰκουμένης Περιήγησις (Ioannina: Kaktos).Google Scholar
Tzvetkova-Glaser, A. 2014. ‘The Concepts of οὐσία and δύναμις in De mundo and Their Parallels in Hellenistic-Jewish and Christian Texts’, in Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, On the Cosmos (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 133–52.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. 2011. Rethinking the Gods: Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Vanotti, G. 2007. Aristotele: Racconti meravigliosi (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. 1894. ‘Antiochos 21 (I Soter)’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 1.2, cols. 2450–5.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (ed.) 1966. Hesiod: Theogony (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1983. The Orphic Poems (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Whitby, M. 2011. ‘Onesikritos (134)’, in Worthington, I (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby, Leiden. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-jacoby/onesikritos-134-a134?s.num=4 (last accessed 3 March 2017).Google Scholar
White, A. C. 1903. A Translation of the Quaestio de aqua et terra (Boston: Ginn & Co.).Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. 2009. ‘Aporiai 9–10’, in Crubellier, M and Laks, A (ed.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 168–72.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2009. ‘A Somewhat Disorderly Nature: Unity in Aristotle’s Meteorologica I–III’, Apeiron 42, 63–88.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2013. Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica: A More Disorderly Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. 2006. ‘Hippias Major 301b2–c2: Plato’s Critique of a Corporeal Conception of Forms and of the Form–Participant Relation’, Apeiron 39, 221–56.Google Scholar
Wood, J. G. 1894. Theophrastus of Eresus on Winds and Other Weather Signs (London: Edward Stanford).Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1885. ‘Über den Ursprung der Schrift von der Welt’, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Philos.-hist. Classe 23, 399–415.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1923. Die Philosophie der Griechen, vol. 3, part 1 (Leipzig: Reisland).Google Scholar
Zonn, I. S., Kostianoy, A. G., Kosarev, A. N. and Glantz, M. H. (eds.) 2010. The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia (Springer:Heidelberg–Dordrecht–London).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Pavel Gregorić, George Karamanolis, Universität Wien, Austria
  • Book: Pseudo-Aristotle: <I>De Mundo (On the Cosmos)</I>
  • Online publication: 10 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108876964.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Pavel Gregorić, George Karamanolis, Universität Wien, Austria
  • Book: Pseudo-Aristotle: <I>De Mundo (On the Cosmos)</I>
  • Online publication: 10 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108876964.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Pavel Gregorić, George Karamanolis, Universität Wien, Austria
  • Book: Pseudo-Aristotle: <I>De Mundo (On the Cosmos)</I>
  • Online publication: 10 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108876964.011
Available formats
×