Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:07:18.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Debriefing post disaster: follow-up after a major earthquake

from Part II - Debriefing: models, research and practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

Kenardy and Carr review experience of debriefing as reported by participants in a community-based study following an earthquake in Newcastle, New South Wales. They also review other work such as that of Mitchell's group, Watt's studies and other research. They note that the perceptions of helpfulness as described in Watt's work are nevertheless frequently uncorrelated with outcome - or, as Ørner has more recently reported, debriefing appears to be perceived as helpful by those who seem to need it least.

The issue of expectancy that debriefing will be beneficial is important, and needs to be addressed in any critical review of debriefing and its potential effectiveness. The authors note that their study was not originally designed as an empirical test of debriefing, but rather was a naturalistic opportunity to incorporate systematic questions into their investigation of the consequences of the earthquake and to explore specifically issues for professional and volunteer disaster workers. Their study evaluated and compared individuals (helpers) who reported having been debriefed with those helpers who did not experience debriefing but were equivalent in terms of personal threat experience and levels of stress in ‘helping’ roles, as well as working in dangerous settings. The debriefed group was composed of more ‘counsellors’ and more women. Their findings report that 80% found debriefing helpful, but outcomes (measured by the Impact of Event Scale and the General Health Questionnaires) were no different, nor was rate of recovery.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 174 - 181
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×