Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:21:10.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Democracy as a Moral Challenge

from Part III - For the People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

Democracy’s realisation depends upon citizens’ aspirations and capacities to sustain forms of self-governance that promote the expression of their personalities and the full actualisation of their potentials. The development of citizens’ personalities and of democracy are in fact mutually interdependent. Whereas citizens’ world views, reasoning, values, aspirations and habits are crucial to sustain the functioning of democratic institutions, the latter set the conditions for nurturing beliefs, motivations and behaviours that accord with their optimal development and with the pursuit of the common good. This makes democracy a challenge that cannot be successfully achieved unless grounded on the moral commitment of all citizens to treat each other with the same respect as each would like to be treated and to care for one another’s wellbeing as one might care for one’s own growth and happiness. Democracy is destined to fail unless the moral agency of citizens operates as a moderator of the new iniquities carried by modernity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
, pp. 307 - 331
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J., Goswami, U., Huppert, F. A., Jenkins, R., Jones, H. S., Kirkwood, T. B. L., Sahakian, B. J. and Thomas, S. M. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455, 10571060.Google Scholar
Blasi, A. (2013). The self and the management of the moral life. In Oser, F. and Lowat, T. (Eds.), Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models and applications, pp. 229248. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. (2004). Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In Lapsley, D. K. and Narvaez, D. (Eds.), Moral development, self and identity, pp. 335347. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Consiglio, C., Picconi, L. and Zimbardo, P. (2003). Personality of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 849851.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Cervone, D. (2000). Personality: Determinants, dynamics and potentials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S. H. Capanna, C., Vecchione, M. and Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 128.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Vecchione, M. (2018). On the left and right ideological divide: Historical accounts and contemporary perspectives. Advances in Political Psychology, 39, 4983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Vecchione, M. (2017). Personalizing politics and realizing democracy. New York. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V. and Vecchione, M. (2015). Democracy through ideology and beyond: The values that are common to the right and the left. Cesckolovenska Psychologie, 59 (Suppl.1), 213.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Capanna, C. and Mebane, M. (2009). Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment and applications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 10021020.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M. and Schwartz, S. H. (2009). The mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 8294.Google Scholar
Cunha, F. and Heckman, J. J. (2009). The economics and psychology of inequality and human development. Journal of European Economic Association, 7, 320364.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1998). On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. and Wattenberg, M. P. (2000). Parties without partisans. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, J. and Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual process motivational theory of ideology, politics and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98109.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. (2006). Polis: An introduction to the ancient Greek city-state. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J., Federico, C. M. and Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307337.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moghaddam, F. M. (2016). The psychology of democracy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F. and Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130159.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (2012). Democracy’s dignity. American Political Science Review, 106, 827846.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good? London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (2007). Democrazia: cosa è? (Democracy: What is it?) Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, pp. 165. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V. and Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Torcal, M. and Montero, J. R. (Eds.) (2006). Political dissatisfaction in contemporary democracies: Social capital, institutions and politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B. and Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623628.Google Scholar
Van der Brug, W. (2010). Structural and ideological voting in age cohorts. West European Politics, 33, 586607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchione, M. and Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 487492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J. E., Vondráková, E., Welzel, C. and Alessandri, G. (2014). Personal values and political activism: A cross national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 84106.Google Scholar
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. and Klingemann, H. D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 341379.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×