Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:42:02.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Dissecting the Psychology of a Voter

A Citizen-Centric Approach in Studying Electoral Experience and Behaviour

from Part II - By the People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

This chapter proposes a new angle in studying the psychology of democracy by embracing a citizen-centric approach through the prism of electoral psychology. Most existing studies in political science focus on voters’ electoral choices, aiming to understand why people support x or y, or indeed, why they vote at all. These questions focus paradoxically on what institutions need from elections, rather than on what they offer voters. I argue electoral choice is often not the most important factor of how an election is experienced by citizens and, instead, investigate how an election affects citizens’ lives, how it makes them and others feel and whether it provides a sense of democratic resolution. The implicit institutional perspective in electoral behaviour is present in existing research, but often is unacknowledged. This chapter identifies those assumptions, assessing some untold consequences and considering instead how the questions we ask and answer change once the assumptions are relaxed. This new electoral psychology approach heralds more nuanced behavioural insights by switching the dependent variables, revisiting existing theories and proposing new concepts. Exploring elements of electoral memory and the experience of the vote, I discuss whether elections can lead to resolution or instead accentuate divisions within society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
, pp. 250 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R. M. and Nagler, J. (2000). A new approach for modelling strategic voting in multiparty elections. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 5775.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E. and Nevitte, N. (2001). Measuring strategic voting in multiparty plurality elections. Electoral Studies, 20(3), 343352.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe?: The emergence of a mass European identity. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. (2019). Electoral ergonomics: Three empirical examples of the interface between electoral psychology and design. Societies, 9(4), 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruter, M. and Harrison, S. (2020). Inside the mind of a voter: A new approach to electoral psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bruter, M. and Harrison, S. (2017). Understanding the emotional act of voting. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 13.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1951). Les partis politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2020a). What is electoral psychology? Scope, concepts, and methodological challenges for studying conscious and subconscious patterns of electoral behavior, experience, and ergonomics. Societies, 10(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. (2020b). Democratic frustration: Concept, dimensions and behavioural consequences. Societies, 10(1), 19.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Bankert, A. and Davies, C. (2018). Expressive versus instrumental partisanship in multiparty European systems. Political Psychology, 39, 173199.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. and Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690707.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1990). Economics and elections: The major Western democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2015). ‘I disrespectfully agree’: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128145.Google Scholar
Reif, K. and Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European Election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 344.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×