References

Claude Fabre

doi:10.1017/9781108774918.024

Aaronson, Scott and Arkhipov, Alex. “The computational complexity of linear optics.” In: Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2011, pp. 333–342.Google Scholar

Aasi, Junaid, Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., et al. “Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light.” In: Nature Photonics 7.8 (2013), pp. 613–619.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adesso, Gerardo, Ragy, Sammy, and Lee, Antony R.. “Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond.” In: Open Systems & Information Dynamics 21.01n02 (2014), p. 1440001.Google Scholar

Aharonov, Yakir, Albert, David Z., and Vaidman, Lev. “How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100.” In: Physical Review Letters 60 (1988), pp. 1351–1354.Google Scholar

Albarelli, Francesco, Genoni, Marco, Paris, Matteo, and Ferraro, Alessandro. “Resource theory of quantum non-Gaussianity and Wigner negativity.” In: Physical Review A 98.5 (2018), p. 052350.Google Scholar

Arute, Frank. “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor.” In: Nature 574.7779 (2019), pp. 505–510.Google Scholar

Arute, Frank and Martinis, John M.. “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor.” In: Nature 574.7779 (2019), pp. 505–510.Google Scholar

Aspect, Alain. “Bell’s theorem: The naive view of an experimentalist.” In: Quantum [Un]Speakables. Springer, 2002, pp. 119–153.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aspect, Alain, grangier, Philippe, and Roger, Gérard. “Experimental Realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities.” In: Physical Review Letters 49, (1982), pp. 91–94.Google Scholar

Aspelmeyer, Markus, Kippenberg, Tobias J., and Marquardt, Florian. “Cavity optomechanics.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 86.4 (2014), p. 1391.Google Scholar

Auletta, Gennaro, Fortunato, Mauro, and Parisi, Giorgio. Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bamber, Charles and Lundeen, Jeff S.. “Observing Dirac’s classical phase space analog to the quantum state.”In: Physical Review Letters 112.7 (2014), p. 070405.Google Scholar

Barnett, Stephen. Quantum Information. Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barnett, Stephen M., Jeffers, John, and Pegg, David T.. “Quantum retrodiction: Foundations and controversies.” In: Symmetry 13.4 (2021), p. 586.Google Scholar

Bell, John. “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.”In: Physics 1.3 (1964), pp. 195–200.Google Scholar

Bell, John. “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 38 (1966), pp. 447–452.Google Scholar

Beugnon, Jérôme, Jones, M. P. A., Dingjan, J., et al. “Quantum interference between two single photons emitted by independently trapped atoms.” In: Nature 440.7085 (2006), pp. 779–782.Google Scholar

Björk, Gunnar, Söderholm, Jonas, Sánchez-Soto, Luis L., et al. “Quantum degrees of polarization.” In: Optics Communications 283.22 (2010), pp. 4440–4447.Google Scholar

Blais, Alexandre Grimsmo, Arne L., Girvin, S. M., and Wallraff, Andreas. “Circuit quantum electrodynamics.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 93 (2021), p. 025005.Google Scholar

Blatt, Rainer and Wineland, David. “Entangled states of trapped atomic ions.” In: Nature 453.7198 (2008), pp. 1008–1015.Google Scholar

Bohm, David. Quantum Theory. Prentice Hall, 1951.Google Scholar

Bohr, Niels. “On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Part I -Binding of electrons by positive nuclei.” In: Philosophical Magazine 26 (1913), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Born, Max. “Statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics.” In: Science 122.3172 (1955), pp. 675–679.Google Scholar

Bouchiat, V., Vion, D., Joyez, P., Esteve, D., and Devoret, M. H.. “Quantum coherence of charge states in the single electron box.” In: Journal of Superconductivity 12.6 (1999), pp. 789–797.Google Scholar

Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., and Zeilinger, A. “Experimental quantum teleportation.”In Nature 390.6660 (1997), pp. 575–579 [Nature Publishing Group].Google Scholar

Bowen, Warwick P. et al. “Polarization squeezing of continuous variable Stokes parameters.” In: Physical Review Letters 88.9 (2002), p. 093601.Google Scholar

Boyd, Robert W.. Nonlinear Optics, 4th ed. Academic Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Brod, Daniel J. et al. “Photonic implementation of boson sampling: a review.” In: Advanced Photonics 1.3 (2019), p. 034001.Google Scholar

R. Hanbury Brown and Twiss, Richard Q.. “Correlation between photons in two coherent beams of light.” In: Nature 177.4497 (1956), pp. 27–29.Google Scholar

Bužek, Vladimir and Hillery, M.. “Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem.” In: Physical Review A 54.3 (1996), p. 1844.Google Scholar

Cai, Y., Roslund, J., Thiel, V., Fabre, C., and Treps, N.. “Quantum enhanced measurement of an optical frequency comb.” In: npj Quantum Information 7.1 (2021), pp. 1–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cantat-Moltrecht, Tigrane, Cortiñas, Rodrigo, Ravon, Brice, et al. “Long-lived circular Rydberg states of laser-cooled rubidium atoms in a cryostat.” In: Physical Review Research 2.2 (2020), p. 022032.Google Scholar

Carmichael, Howard. An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics. Springer, 1991.Google Scholar

Case, William B.. “Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedestrians.” In: American Journal of Physics 76.10 (2008), pp. 937–946.Google Scholar

Caves, Carlton M.. “Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer.” In: Physical Review D 23.8 (1981), p. 1693.Google Scholar

Chabaud, Ulysse, Markham, Damian, and Grosshans, Frédéric. “Stellar representation of non-Gaussian quantum states.” In: Physical Review Letters 124 (2020), p. 063605.Google Scholar

Chamberland, Christopher, Zhu, Guanyu, Yoder, Theodore J., Hertzberg, Jared B., and Cross, Andrew W.. “Topological and subsystem codes on low-degree graphs with flag qubits.” In: Physical Review X 10 (2020), p. 011022.Google Scholar

Chesca, Boris, Kleiner, Reinhold, and Koelle, Dieter. “SQUID theory.” In: Clarke, John and Braginski, Alex I. (eds.) The SQUID Handbook. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2004, pp. 29–92.Google Scholar

Clarke, John. “SQUIDs.” In: Scientific American 271.2 (1994), pp. 46–53.Google Scholar

Clauser, J. F. Shimony and Shimony, Abner. “Bell’s theorem: Experimental tests and implications.” In: Reports on Progress in Physics 41.12 (1978), p. 1881.Google Scholar

Clauser, J. F., Horne, Michael, Shimony, Abner, and Holt, R.. “Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories.” In: Physical Review Letters 23 (1969), p. 880.Google Scholar

Clerk, Aashish A.. “Optomechanics and quantum measurement.” In: Lecture notes, Les Houches Summer School on Optomechanics (2015).CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohadon, Pierre-Francois, Harris, Jack, Marquardt, Florian, and Cugliandolo, Leticia (eds.) Quantum Optomechanics and Nanomechanics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 105, August 2015. Vol. 105. Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude, Diu, Bernard, and Laloe, Franck. Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 3. Wiley, 2019.Google Scholar

Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude, Diu, Bernard, and Laloe, Frank. Quantum Mechanics, Vols. 1 and 2. Wiley-Interscience, 2006.Google Scholar

Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude and Guery-Odelin, David. Advances in Atomic Physics: An Overview. World Scientific, 2011.Google Scholar

Curtright, Thomas L., Fairlie, David B., and Zachos, Cosmas K.. A Concise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space. World Scientific Publishing Company, 2013.Google Scholar

Dalibard, Jean, Castin, Yvan, and Mølmer, Klaus. “Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics.” In: Physical Review Letters 68 (1992), pp. 580–583.Google Scholar

Davidovich, Luis. “Towards the ultimate precision limits: An introduction to quantum metrology.” In: Invited lecture at College de France (2016).Google Scholar

Dehmelt, H. G.. “Radiofrequency Spectroscopy of Stored Ions”. In: Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics 3, (1968), pp. 53–72.Google Scholar

Delaubert, Vincent, Treps, Nicolas, Lassen, Mikael, et al. “TEM 10 homodyne detection as an optimal small-displacement and tilt-measurement scheme.” In: Physical Review A 74.5 (2006), p. 053823.Google Scholar

Deleglise, Samuel, Dotsenko, I., Sayrin, C., et al. “Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence.” In: Nature 455.7212 (2008), pp. 510–514.Google Scholar

Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Rafal, Jarzyna, Marcin, and Kolodyński, Jan. “Quantum limits in optical interferometry.” In: Wolf, E.. (ed.), Progress in Optics, Vol. 60. Elsevier, 2015, pp. 345–435.Google Scholar

Devoret, M., Esteve, Daniel, Urbina, C., et al. “Macroscopic quantum effects in the current-biased Josephson junction”. In: Kagan, Yu and Leggett, A. J. (eds.) Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Science, Elsevier, 1992, pp. 313–345.Google Scholar

Devoret, M. H. and Schoelkopf, R. J.. “Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook.” In: Science 339.6124 (2013), pp. 1169–1174.Google Scholar

Devoret, Michel H.. “Does Brian Josephson’s gauge-invariant phase difference live on a line or a circle?” In: Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 34.6 (2021), pp. 1633–1642.Google Scholar

Dirac, Paul. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Dirac, Paul A. M.. “On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 17.2–3 (1945), p. 195.Google Scholar

Dousse, Adrien, Suffczyński, Jan, Beveratos, Alexios, et al. “Ultra-bright source of entangled photon pairs.”In: Nature 466.7303 (2010), pp. 217–220.Google Scholar

Duan, Lu-Ming, Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I., and Zoller, P.. “Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems.”In: Physical Review Letters 84.12 (2000), p. 2722.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dutta, Biswadeb, Mukunda, Narasimhaiengar, Simon, Rajiah, et al. “The real symplectic groups in quantum mechanics and optics.” In: Pramana 45.6 (1995), pp. 471–497.Google Scholar

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.. “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” In: Physical Review 47 (1935), p. 777.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. “On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light.” In: Annalen der Physik (1905), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. “Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt.” In: Annalen der Physik 17 (1905), pp. 132–148.Google Scholar

Escher, B. M., de Matos Filho, R. L., and Davidovich, Luiz. “General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology.” In: Nature Physics 7.5 (2011), pp. 406–411.Google Scholar

Fabre, Claude and Treps, Nicolas. “Modes and states in quantum optics.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 92.3 (2020), p. 035005.Google Scholar

Fabre, Claude, Sandoghdar, Vahid, Treps, Nicolas, and Cugliandolo, Leticia F. (eds). Quantum optics and nanophotonics. Vol. 101. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Fischer, Marc Kolachevsky, N., Zimmermann, M., et al. “New limits on the drift of fundamental constants from laboratory measurements.” In: Physical Review Letters 92.23 (2004), p. 230802.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frattini, Nicholas. Three-wave Mixing in Superconducting Circuits: Stabilizing Cats with SNAILs. Yale University, PhD thesis, 2021.Google Scholar

Freedman, Stuart J. and Clauser, John F.. “Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories.” In: Physical Review Letters 28 (1972), pp. 938–941.Google Scholar

Furusawa, Akira, Sørensen, J. L., Braunstein, S. L., et al. “Unconditional quantum teleportation.” In: Science 282.5389 (1998), pp. 706–709.Google Scholar

Gao, Yan, Deng, Li, and Chen, Aixi. “Optical bistability in an optome-chanical system with N-type atoms under nonresonant conditions.” In: Photonics 7.4. (2020), p. 122.Google Scholar

García-Patrón, Raúl, Renema, Jelmer J., and Shchesnovich, Valery. “Simulating boson sampling in lossy architectures.” In: Quantum 3 (2019), p. 169.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gard, Bryan T., Motes, Keith R., Olson, Jonathan P., Rohde, Peter P., and Dowling, Jonathan P.. “An introduction to boson-sampling.” In: From Atomic to Mesoscale: The Role of Quantum Coherence in Systems of Various Complexities. World Scientific, 2015, pp. 167–192.Google Scholar

Gardiner, Crispin and Zoller, Peter. Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.Google Scholar

Girvin, Steven M.. “Superconducting qubits and circuits: Artificial atoms coupled to microwave photons.” In: Lectures delivered at Ecole d’Eté Les Houches. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Giustina, M., Versteegh, Marijn A. M., Wengerowsky, Sören, et al. “Significant loophole-free tests of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons.” In: Physical Review Letters 115 (2015), p. 250401.Google Scholar

Grangier, Philippe, Aspect, Alain, and Vigue, Jacques. “Quantum interference effect for two atoms radiating a single photon.” In: Physical Review Letters 54 (1985), pp. 418–421.Google Scholar

Grangier, Philippe, Levenson, Juan Ariel, and Poizat, Jean-Philippe. “Quantum non-demolition measurements in optics.” In: Nature 396.6711 (1998), pp. 537–542.Google Scholar

Grimm, A., Frattini, N. E., Puri, S., et al. “Stabilization and operation of a Kerrcat qubit.” In: Nature 584.7820 (2020), pp. 205–209.Google Scholar

Grosshans, Frédéric and Grangier, Philippe. “Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states.” In: Physical Review Letters 88.5 (2002), p. 057902.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grynberg, Gilbert, Aspect, Alain, and Fabre, Claude. Introduction to Quantum Optics, From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Guerlin, C.. Mesure quantique non destructive répétée de la lumière: états de Fock et trajectoires quantiques. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, PhD thesis, 2007.Google Scholar

Guha, Biswarup, Mariani, Silvia, Lemaître, Aristide, et al. “High frequency optomechanical disk resonators in III–V ternary semiconductors.” In: Optics Express 25.20 (2017), pp. 24639–24649.Google Scholar

Hammerer, Klemens, Sørensen, Anders S., and Polzik, Eugene S.. “Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 82.2 (2010), p. 1041.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haroche, S., Brune, M., and Raimond, J. M.. “From cavity to circuit quantum electrodynamics.” In: Nature Physics 16.3 (2020), pp. 243–246.Google Scholar

Haroche, Serge. “Nobel Lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 85.3 (2013), p. 1083.Google Scholar

Haroche, Serge and Raimond, J.-M.. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Harris, S. E., Oshman, M. K., and Byer, R. L.. “Observation of tunable optical parametric fluorescence.” In: Physical Review Letters 18.18 (1967), p. 732.Google Scholar

Heidmann, A., Horowicz, R. J., Reynaud, S., et al. “Observation of quantum noise reduction on twin laser beams.” In: Physical Review Letters 59.22 (1987), p. 2555.Google Scholar

Hell, Stefan W.. “Nanoscopy with focused light (Nobel Lecture).” In: Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54.28 (2015), pp. 8054–8066.Google Scholar

Helstrom, C.. “The minimum variance of estimates in quantum signal detection.” In: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 14.2 (1968), pp. 234–242.Google Scholar

Helstrom, Carl W.. “Quantum detection and estimation theory.” In: Journal of Statistical Physics 1.2 (1969), pp. 231–252.Google Scholar

Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A., et al. “Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres.” In: Nature 526 (2015), p. 682.Google Scholar

Hillary, M., O’Connell, R. F., Scully, M. O., and Wigner, E. P.. “Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals.” In: Physics Reports 106.3 (1984), pp. 121–167.Google Scholar

Hong, Chong-Ki, Ou, Zhe-Yu, and Mandel, Leonard. “Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference.” In: Physical Review Letters 59.18 (1987), p. 2044.Google Scholar

Horodecki, Ryszard, Horodecki, Paweł, Horodecki, Michał, and Horodecki, Karol. “Quantum entanglement.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 81.2 (2009), p. 865.Google Scholar

Hulet, Randall G., Hilfer, Eric S., and Kleppner, Daniel. “Inhibited spontaneous emission by a Rydberg atom.” In: Physical Review Letters 55 (1985), pp. 2137–2140.Google Scholar

Jaekel, Marc Thierry and Reynaud, Serge. “Quantum limits in interferometric measurements.” In: Europhysics Letters 13.4 (1990), p. 301.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T.. “Clearing up mysteries – The original goal.” In: Skilling, J. (ed.) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Springer, 1989, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T.. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Edited by Bretthorst, G.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kennard, Earle H.. “Zur quantenmechanik einfacher bewegungstypen.” In: Zeitschrift für Physik 44.4 (1927), pp. 326–352.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Gerhard, Vlastakis, B., Leghtas, Z., et al. “Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon Kerr effect.” In: Nature 495.7440 (2013), pp. 205–209.Google Scholar

Kleppner, Daniel. “Inhibited Spontaneous Emission.” In: Physical Review Letters 47 (1981), pp. 233–236.Google Scholar

Koch, Jens, Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., et al. “Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box.” In: Physical Review A 76 (2007), p. 042319.Google Scholar

Kraus, K.. States, Effects, and Operations. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 190. Springer, 1983.Google Scholar

Laloë, Franck. Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Landau, Lev. “The damping problem in wave mechanics.” In: Zeitschrift für Physik 45 (1927), p. 430.Google Scholar

Lapaire, G. G., Kok, Pieter, Dowling, Jonathan P., and Sipe, J. E.. “Conditional linear-optical measurement schemes generate effective photon nonlinearities.” In: Physical Review A 68 (2003), p. 042314.Google Scholar

Laurat, Julien, Coudreau, T., Treps, N., Maître, A., and Fabre, C.. “Conditional preparation of a quantum state in the continuous variable regime: Generation of a sub-Poissonian state from twin beams.” In: Physical Review Letters 91.21 (2003), p. 213601.Google Scholar

Laurat, Julien, Choi, K. S., Deng, H., Chou, C. W., and Kimble, H. J.. “Heralded entanglement between atomic ensembles: Preparation, decoherence, and scaling.” In: Physical Review Letters 99.18 (2007), p. 180504.Google Scholar

Le Bellac, Michel. Quantum Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Leonhardt, Ulf. Measuring the Quantum State of Light. Vol. 22. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Likharev, Konstantin K.. Quantum Mechanics: Lecture Notes. Vol. 5. IOP Publishing Ltd. 2019.Google Scholar

Loudon, Rodney. The Quantum Theory of Light. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Lutterbach, L. G. and Davidovich, L.. “Method for direct measurement of the Wigner function in cavity QED and ion traps.” In: Physical Review Letters 78.13 (1997), p. 2547.Google Scholar

Lvovsky, Alexander I. and Raymer, Michael G.. “Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 81.1 (2009), p. 299.Google Scholar

Magnard, P., Storz, S., Kurpiers, P., et al. “Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems.” In: Physical Review Letters 125.26 (2020), p. 260502.Google Scholar

Majer, J., Chow, J., Gambetta, J., et al. “Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus.” In: Nature 449.7161 (2007), pp. 443–447.Google Scholar

Mancini, Stefano, Giovannetti, V., Vitali, D., and Tombesi, P.. “Entangling macroscopic oscillators exploiting radiation pressure.”In: Physical Review Letters 88.12 (2002), p. 120401.Google Scholar

Martinis, John M. and Osborne, Kevin. “Superconducting qubits and the physics of Josephson junctions.” In: ArXiv cond-mat/0402415 (2004).Google Scholar

Martynov, Denis V., Hall, E. D., Abbott, B. P., et al. “Sensitivity of the advanced LIGO detectors at the beginning of gravitational wave astronomy.” In: Physical Review D 93.11 (2016), p. 112004.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. H. and Fry, E. S.. “Restrictions on nonlocal hidden-variable theory.” In: Physical Review D 7 (1973), pp. 555–557.Google Scholar

Meekhof, D. M., Monroe, C., King, B. E., Itano, W. M., and Wineland, D. J.. “Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom [Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1796 (1996)].” In: Physical Review Letters 77.11 (1996), p. 2346.Google Scholar

Mermin, N. David. “Commentary: Quantum mechanics: Fixing the shifty split.” In: Physics Today 65.7 (2012), p. 8.Google Scholar

Miller, Aaron J, Nam, Sae Woo, Martinis, John M., and Sergienko, Alexander V.. “Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination.” In: Applied Physics Letters 83.4 (2003), pp. 791–793.Google Scholar

Minev, Z. K. Mundhada, S. O., Shankar, S., et al. “To catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight.” In: Nature 570.7760 (June 2019), pp. 200–204.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Morgan W and Alvarez, Silvana Palacios. “Colloquium: Quantum limits to the energy resolution of magnetic field sensors.” In: Review of Modern Physics 92.2 (2020), p. 021001.Google Scholar

Moerner, W. E. and Fromm, David P.. “Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy.” In: Review of Scientific Instruments 74.8 (2003), pp. 3597–3619.Google Scholar

Monroe, Christopher, Meekhof, D. M., King, B. E., and Wineland, D. J.. “A “Schrödinger cat” superposition state of an atom.” In: Science 272.5265 (1996), pp. 1131–1136.Google Scholar

Morin, Olivier, D’Auria, V., Fabre, C., and Laurat, J.. “High-fidelity single-photon source based on a Type II optical parametric oscillator.” In: Optics Letters 37.17 (2012), pp. 3738–3740.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nagourney, Warren, Sandberg, Jon, and Dehmelt, Hans. “Shelved optical electron amplifier: Observation of quantum jumps.” In: Physical Review Letters 56.26 (1986), p. 2797.Google Scholar

Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Yu A., and Tsai, J. S.. “Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box.” In: Nature 398.6730 (1999), pp. 786–788.Google Scholar

Narla, A., Shankar, S., Hatridge, M., et al. “Robust concurrent remote entanglement between two superconducting qubits.” In: Physical Review X 6 (2016), p. 031036.Google Scholar

Neuhauser, W., Hohenstatt, M., Toschek, P. E., and Dehmelt, H. G.. “Visual observation and optical cooling of electrodynamically contained ions.” In: Applied Physics 17.2 (1978), pp. 123–129.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Michael and Chuang, Isaac. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ou, ZY, Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J., and Peng, K. C.. “Realization of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox for continuous variables.” In: Physical Review Letters 68.25 (1992), p. 3663.Google Scholar

Ozawa, Masanao. “Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement.” In: Physical Review A 67.4 (2003), p. 042105.Google Scholar

Paris, Matteo G. A.. “The modern tools of quantum mechanics.” In: The European Physical Journal Special Topics 203.1 (2012), pp. 61–86.Google Scholar

Paul, Wolfgang. “Electromagnetic traps for charged and neutral particles.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 62 (1990), pp. 531–540.Google Scholar

Pegg, David T., Phillips, Lee S., and Barnett, Stephen M.. “Optical state truncation by projection synthesis.” In: Physical Review Letters 81.8 (1998), p. 1604.Google Scholar

Peres, A.. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar

Peshkin, Murray and Tonomura, Akira. The Aharonov–Bohm Effect. Vol. 340. Springer, 1989.Google Scholar

Pinel, Olivier, Fade, Julien, Braun, Daniel, et al. “Ultimate sensitivity of precision measurements with intense Gaussian quantum light: A multimodal approach.” In: Physical Review A 85.1 (2012), p. 010101.Google Scholar

Pirkkalainen, J.-M., Damskägg, E., Brandt, M., Massel, F., and Sillanpää, M. A.. “Squeezing of quantum noise of motion in a microme-chanical resonator.” In: Physical Review Letters 115.24 (2015), p. 243601.Google Scholar

Planck, Max. “On the theory of the energy distribution law of the normal spectrum.” In: Verhandl Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft 2 (1900), p. 237.Google Scholar

Preskill, John. “Lecture notes for physics 229: Quantum information and computation.” California Institute of Technology (1998).Google Scholar

Puri, Shruti, Boutin, Samuel, and Blais, Alexandre. “Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving.” In: npj Quantum Information 3 (2017), article no. 18.Google Scholar

Raussendorf, Robert and Briegel, Hans J.. “A one-way quantum computer.” In: Physical Review Letters 86.22 (2001), p. 5188.Google Scholar

Raymer, M. G.. “Uncertainty principle for joint measurement of noncommuting variables.” In: American Journal of Physics 62.11 (1994), pp. 986–993.Google Scholar

Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J., and Bertani, P.. (1994). “Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator.” In: Physical Review Letters 73.1 (1994), pp. 58–61.Google Scholar

Réfrégier, Philippe. Noise Theory and Application to Physics: From Fluctuations to Information. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.Google Scholar

Reid, Margaret D.. “Demonstration of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification.” In: Physical Review A 40.2 (1989), p. 913.Google Scholar

Robertson, Howard Percy. “The uncertainty principle.” In: Physical Review 34.1 (1929), p. 163.Google Scholar

Roy, Ananda and Devoret, Michel. “Introduction to parametric amplification of quantum signals with Josephson circuits.” In: Comptes Rendus Physique 17.7 (2016), pp. 740–755.Google Scholar

Rozema, Lee A., Darabi, Ardavan, Mahler, Dylan H., et al. “Violation of Heisenberg’s measurement-disturbance relationship by weak measurements.” In: Physical Review Letters 109.10 (2012), p. 100404.Google Scholar

Schleich, Wolfgang P.. Quantum Optics in Phase Space. John Wiley and Sons, 2011.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E.. “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems.” In: Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 31.4 (1935), p. 555.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, Erwin. “An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules.” In: Physical Review 28.6 (1926), p. 1049.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, Erwin. “Are there quantum jumps? Part I.” In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3.10 (1952), p. 109–123.Google Scholar

Scully, Marlan O. and Zubairy, M. Suhail. Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Shalm, Lynden K., Meyer-Scott, Evan, Christensen, Bradley G., et al. “Strong loophole-free test of local realism.” In: Physical Review Letters 115 (2015), p. 250402.Google Scholar

Sherson, Jacob F, Weitenberg, Christof, Endres, Manuel, et al. “Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator.”In: Nature 467.7311 (2010), pp. 68–72.Google Scholar

Simon, Rajiah. “Peres–Horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems.” In: Physical Review Letters 84.12 (2000), p. 2726.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, P. H. Souto, Schwob, C., Maître, A., and Fabre, C.. “Sub-shot-noise high-sensitivity spectroscopy with optical parametric oscillator twin beams.” In: Optics letters 22.24 (1997), pp. 1893–1895.Google Scholar

Takamoto, Masao, Hong, Feng-Lei, Higashi, Ryoichi, and Katori, Hidetoshi. “An optical lattice clock.” In: Nature 435.7040 (2005), pp. 321–324.Google Scholar

Tapster, P. R., Rarity, J. G., and Satchell, J. S.. “Generation of sub-Poissonian light by high-efficiency light-emitting diodes.” In: Europhysics Letters 4.3 (1987), p. 293.Google Scholar

Tesche, Claudia and Clarke, John. “dc SQUID: Noise and optimization.” In: Journal of Low Temperature Physics 29.3 (1977), pp. 301–331.Google Scholar

Vahlbruch, Henning, Mehmet, Moritz, Danzmann, Karsten, and Schnabel, Roman. “Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency.” In: Physical Review Letters 117.11 (2016), p. 110801.Google Scholar

Venkatraman, Jayameenakshi Xiao, Xu, Cortiñas, Rodrigo G., Eickbusch, Alec, and Devoret, Michel H.. “Static effective Hamiltonian of a rapidly driven nonlinear system.” In: Physical Review Letters 129 (2022), p. 100601.Google Scholar

Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H., and Siddiqi, I.. “Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom.” In: Physical Review Letters 106 (2011), p. 110502.Google Scholar

von Neumann, John. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

von Neumann, John. “Probability structure of quantum mechanics.” In: Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1927 (1927), pp. 245–272.Google Scholar

Walschaers, Mattia, Fabre, Claude, Parigi, Valentina, and Treps, Nicolas. “Entanglement and Wigner function negativity of multimode non-Gaussian states.” In: Physical Review Letters 119.18 (2017), p. 183601.Google Scholar

Weedbrook, Christian, Pirandola, Stefano, García-Patrón, Raúl, et al. “Gaussian quantum information.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 84.2 (2012), p. 621.Google Scholar

Wielinga, B. and Milburn, G. J.. “Quantum tunneling in a Kerr medium with parametric pumping.” In: Physical Review A 48 (1993), pp. 2494–2496.Google Scholar

Wigner, Eugene P.. “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium.” In: Wightman, Arthur S. (ed.) Part I: Physical Chemistry. Part II: Solid State Physics. Springer, 1997, pp. 110–120.Google Scholar

Wineland, David J.. “Nobel lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising Schrödinger’s cat.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 85.3 (2013), p. 1103.Google Scholar

Wiseman, Howard M. and Milburn, Gerard J.. Quantum Measurement and Control. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Wu, Ling-An, Kimble, H. J., Hall, J. L., and Wu, Huifa. “Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion.” In: Physical Review Letters 57.20 (1986), p. 2520.Google Scholar

Yang, Kai, Paul, William, Phark, Soo-Hyon, et al. “Coherent spin manipulation of individual atoms on a surface.” In: Science 366.6464 (2019), pp. 509–512.Google Scholar

Yurke, B. and Stoler, D.. “The dynamic generation of Schrödinger cats and their detection.” In: Physica B+C 151.1 (1988), pp. 298–301.Google Scholar

Yurke, Bernard, McCall, Samuel L., and Klauder, John R.. “SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers.” In: Physical Review A 33 (1986), pp. 4033–4054.Google Scholar

Zhang, T-C, Poizat, Jean-Philippe, Grelu, Philippe, et al. “Quantum noise of free-running and externally-stabilized laser diodes.” In: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B 7.4 (1995), p. 601.Google Scholar

Minev, Zlatko. Catching and Reversing a Quantum Jump Mid-Flight. Yale University, PhD thesis, 2019.Google Scholar

Zurek, W. H.. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?” In: Physical Review D 24 (1981), pp. 1516–1525.Google Scholar

Zurek, Wojciech Hubert. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical.” In: Reviews of Modern Physics 75.3 (2003), p. 715.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive