Book contents
- Rapid Ethnographies
- Rapid Ethnographies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Vignettes
- Case Studies
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Key Debates in the Field of Rapid Ethnographies
- 3 A Brief History of the Work Prior to Rapid Ethnographies
- 4 Rapid Ethnographies as a Lone Researcher
- 5 Team-Based Rapid Ethnographies
- 6 Ethics, Practical Considerations and the Emotional Labour of Rapid Ethnographic Fieldwork
- 7 Dissemination and the Use of Findings
- 8 The Future of Rapid Ethnographies
- Book part
- Further Reading
- References
- Index
- References
Further Reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 November 2020
Book contents
- Rapid Ethnographies
- Rapid Ethnographies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Vignettes
- Case Studies
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Key Debates in the Field of Rapid Ethnographies
- 3 A Brief History of the Work Prior to Rapid Ethnographies
- 4 Rapid Ethnographies as a Lone Researcher
- 5 Team-Based Rapid Ethnographies
- 6 Ethics, Practical Considerations and the Emotional Labour of Rapid Ethnographic Fieldwork
- 7 Dissemination and the Use of Findings
- 8 The Future of Rapid Ethnographies
- Book part
- Further Reading
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rapid EthnographiesA Practical Guide, pp. 151 - 155Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Primary Sources
Anker, M, Guidotti, S, Orseszyna, S, Thuroax, M. Rapid evaluation methods (REM) of health service performance: Methodological observations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1993;71(1):15–21.Google Scholar
McNall, M, Foster-Fishman, P. Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. American Journal of Evaluation 2007;28(2):151–168.Google Scholar
McNall, MA, Welch, VE, Ruh, KL, et al. The use of rapid-feedback evaluation methods to improve the retention rates of an HIV/AIDS healthcare intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning 2004;27:287–294.Google Scholar
Nunns, H. Responding to the demand for quicker evaluation findings. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 2009;34:89–99.Google Scholar
Shrank, W. The center for medicare and medicaid innovation's blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Affairs 2013;32:807–812.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Johnson, GA, Vindrola-Padros, C. Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 2017;189:63–75.Google Scholar
Johnson, GA, Vindrola-Padros, C. Rapid techniques in qualitative research: A critical review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research 2020, doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.Google Scholar
Vindrola-Padros, C, Brage, E, Johnson, GA. Rapid, responsive and relevant? A systematic review of rapid evaluations in healthcare. American Journal of Evaluation 2020, doi: 10.1177/1098214019886914.Google Scholar
Vindrola-Padros, C, Vindrola-Padros, B. Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery. BMJ Quality and Safety 2018;27:321–330.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, S, et al. Community-centered responses to Ebola in urban Liberia: The view from below. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2015;9(4):e0003706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, J. Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal. Human Organization 1995;54(1):42–51.Google Scholar
Beebe, J. Rapid Qualitative Inquiry. Second edn. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 2014.Google Scholar
Beebe, J. Rapid assessment process. In: Kempf-Leonard, K, editor. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. New York: Elsevier; 2005: 285–291.Google Scholar
Brown, D., et al. A participatory action research pilot study of urban health disparities using rapid assessment response and evaluation. American Journal of Public Health 2008;98(1):28–38. THIS IS THE ARTICLE THAT HAS EXAMPLES OF THE RAP SHEETGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. Participatory rural appraisal: Analysis of experience. World Development 1994a;22(9):1253–1268.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 1994b;22(7):953–969. THIS IS THE ARTICLE THAT LISTS THE 29 METHODS.Google Scholar
Fitch, C, Rhodes, T, Stimson, G. Origins of an epidemic: The methodological and political emergence of rapid assessment. International Journal of Drug Policy 2000;11:63–82.Google Scholar
Harris, K, Jerome, N, Fawcett, S. Rapid assessment procedures: A review and critique. Human Organization 1997;56(3):375–378.Google Scholar
Manderson, L, Aaby, P. Can rapid anthropological procedures be applied to tropical diseases? Health Policy and Planning 1992a;7(1):46–55.Google Scholar
Manderson, L, Aaby, P. An epidemic in the field? Rapid assessment procedures and health research. Social Science & Medicine 1992b;35(7):839–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMullen, C., et al. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: An efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. Methods of Information in Medicine 2011;50(4):299–307.Google ScholarPubMed
Rifkin, S. Rapid appraisals for health: An overview. Rapid Rural Appraisal Notes 1992;16:7–12.Google Scholar
Scrimshaw, S, Hurtado, E. Anthropological involvement on the Central American diarrheal disease control project. Social Science & Medicine 1988;27(1):97–105.Google Scholar
Trotter, RTII, Needle, RH, Goosby, E, Bates, C, Singer, M. A methodological model for rapid assessment, response, and evaluation: The RARE program in public health. Field Methods 2001:13(2):137–159.Google Scholar
Utarini, A, Winkvist, A, Pelto, G. Appraising studies in health using rapid assessment procedures (RAP): Eleven critical criteria. Human Organization 2001;60(4):390–400.Google Scholar
Bentley, M, Pelto, G, Straus, W, Schumann, D, Adegbola, C, de la Pena, E, et al. Rapid ethnographic assessment: Applications in diarrhea management program. Social Science & Medicine 1988;27(1):107–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz, E, Higginbottom, G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Researcher 2013;20(4):36–43.Google Scholar
Handwerker, P. Quick Ethnography: A Guide to Rapid Multi-Method Research. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2001.Google Scholar
Pink, S, Morgan, J. Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction 2013;36(3):351–361.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. Transcribing with voice recognition software: A new tool for qualitative researchers. Qualitative Health Research 1998;8(5):718–723.Google Scholar
Burgess-Allen, J, Owen-Smith, V. Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes. Health Expect 2010;13:406–415.Google Scholar
Gravois, T, Rosenfield, S, Greenberg, B. Establishing reliability for coding implementation concerns of school-based teams from audiotapes. Evaluation Review 1992;16(5):562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M, Kendrick, T, Davies, H, Gill, F. Hearing voices: Comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data. Applied Nursing Research 2017;35:90–93.Google Scholar
Halcomb, EJ, Davidson, PM. Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Applied Nursing Research 2006;19(1):38–42.Google Scholar
Joe, J, Chaudhuri, S, Le, T, Thompson, H, Demiris, G. The use of think-aloud and instant data analysis in evaluation research: Exemplar and lessons learned. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2015;56:284–291.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. The speed and accuracy of voice recognition software-assisted transcription versus the listen-and-type method: A research note. Qualitative Research 2011;11(1):91–97.Google Scholar
Lopez, KD, Febretti, A, Stifter, J, Johnson, A, Wilkie, DJ, Keenan, G. Toward a more robust and efficient usability testing method of clinical decision support for nurses derived from nursing electronic health record data. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 2017;28(4):211–218.Google Scholar
Markle, T, West, R, Rich, P. Beyond transcription: Technology, change and refinement of method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2011;12(3):art. 21.Google Scholar
Neal, J, Neal, Z, VanDyke, E, Kornbluh, M. Expediting the analysis of qualitative data in evaluation: A procedure for the rapid identification of themes from audio recordings (RITA). American Journal of Evaluation 2015;36(1):118–132.Google Scholar
Park, J, Zeanah, E. An evaluation of voice recognition software for use in interview-based research: A research note. Qualitative Research 2005;5(2):245–251.Google Scholar
Scott, SD, Sharpe, H, O'Leary, K, Dehaeck, U, Hindmarsh, K, Moore, JG, Osmond, MH. Court reporters: A viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection? Qualitative Health Research 2009;19(1):140–146.Google Scholar
Tattersall, C, Vernon, S. Mind mapping as a tool in qualitative research. Nursing Times 2007;103(26):32–33.Google Scholar
Taylor, B, Henshall, C, Kenyon, S, Litchfield, I, Greenfield, S. Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open 2018:e019993.Google Scholar
Tessier, S. From field notes to transcripts to tape recordings: Evolution or combination? International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2012;11(4):446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, D. Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The ‘RADaR’ technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2017;16:1–9.Google Scholar
Anker, M, Guidotti, RJ, Orzeszyna, S, Sapirie, S. A, Thuriaux, MC. Rapid evaluation methods (REM) of health services performance: Methodological observations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1993;71(1):15–21.Google Scholar
Aspray, TJ, Nesbit, K, Cassidy, TP, Hawthorne, G. Rapid assessment methods used for health-equity audit: Diabetes mellitus among frail British care-home residents. Public Health 2006;120(11):1042–1051.Google Scholar
Bjornson-Benson, WM, Stibolt, TB, Manske, KA, Zavela, KJ, Youtsey, DJ, Buist, AS. Monitoring recruitment effectiveness and cost in a clinical trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 1993;14(2 Suppl):52S–67S.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, SNM, Moni, D. A situation analysis of the menstrual regulation programme in Bangladesh. Reproductive Health Matters 2004;12(24 Suppl):95–104.Google Scholar
Felisberto, E, Freese, E, Natal, S, Alves, CK de A. [A contribution to institutionalized health evaluation: A proposal for self-evaluation]. Cadernos de saude publica 2008;24(9):2091–2102.Google Scholar
Gale, R, Wu, J, Erhardt, T, Bounthavong, M, Reardon, C, Damschroder, L, Midboe, A. Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implementation Science 2019;14:11.Google Scholar
Glasgow, R. et al. Conducting rapid, relevant research lessons learned from the my own health report project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2014;47(2):212–219.Google Scholar
Grant, L., et al. Palliative care making a difference in rural Uganda, Kenya and Malawi: Three rapid evaluation field studies. BMC Palliative Care 2011;10:8.Google Scholar
Grasso, P. What makes an evaluation useful? Reflections from experience in large organizations. American Journal of Evaluation 2003;24(4):507–514.Google Scholar
Keith, R. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implementation Science 2017;12:15.Google Scholar
McNall, M, Welch, V, Ruh, K, Mildner, C, Soto, T. The use of rapid-feedback evaluation methods to improve the retention rates of an HIV/AIDS healthcare intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning 2004;27:287–294.Google Scholar
Munday, D. et al. Rural palliative care in North India: Rapid evaluation of a program using a realist mixed method approach. Indian Journal of Palliative Care 2018;24(1):3–8.Google Scholar
Nunns, H. Responding to the demand for quicker evaluation findings. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 2009;34:89–99.Google Scholar
Riley, W., et al. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: A call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clinical and Translational Science 2013;2:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeweiss, S, Shrank, WH, Ruhl, M, Maclure, M. Decision-making aligned with rapid-cycle evaluation in health care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2015;31:214–222.Google Scholar
Shrank, W. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Affairs 2013;32(4):807–812.Google Scholar
Skillman, M. et al. A framework for rigorous qualitative research as a component of mixed method rapid-cycle evaluation. Qualitative Health Research 2019;29(2):279–289.Google Scholar
Taylor, B, Henshall, C, Kenyon, S, et al. Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019993.Google Scholar
Zakocs, R, Hill, JA, Brown, P, Wheaton, J, Freire, KE. The data-to-action framework: A rapid program improvement process. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 2015;42(4):471–479.Google Scholar
Tricco, A, et al. Rapid Reviews to Strengthen Health Policy and Systems: A Practical Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.Google Scholar