Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:29:34.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - (Mis)Understandings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2019

Edited by
Grant Christensen  and
Melissa L. Tatum
Grant Christensen
Affiliation:
University of North Dakota
Melissa L. Tatum
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Reading American Indian Law
Foundational Principles
 , pp. 307 - 402
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Berger, Bethany R., Indian Policy and the Imagined Indian Woman, 14 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 103 (2004).Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi, Family Law, Federalism, and the Federal Courts, 79 Iowa L. Rev. 1073 (1994).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M., Resisting Federal Courts on Tribal Jurisdiction, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 973 (2010).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M., The Supreme Court’s Indian Problem, 59 Hastings L.J. 579 (2008).Google Scholar
Gover, Kevin & Laurence, Robert, Avoiding Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez: The Litigation in Federal Court of Civil Actions under the Indian Civil Rights Act, 8 Hamline L. Rev. 497 (1985).Google Scholar
Jones, B.J., Welcoming Tribal Courts into the Judicial Fraternity: Emerging Issues in Tribal–State and Tribal–Federal Court Relations, 24 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 457 (1998).Google Scholar
Koehn, Melissa L., Civil Jurisdiction: The Boundaries between Federal and Tribal Courts, 29 Ariz. St. L.J. 705 (1997).Google Scholar
Laurence, Robert, A Quincentennial Essay on Martinez v. Santa Clara Pueblo, 28 Idaho L. Rev. 307 (1992).Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, On Political Boundary Lines, Multiculturalism, and the Liberal State, 72 Ind. L.J. 403 (1997).Google Scholar
Lawson, Gary, Territorial Governments and the Limits of Formalism, 78 Calif. L. Rev. 853 (1990).Google Scholar
Royster, Judith V., Stature and Scrutiny: Post-Exhaustion Review of Tribal Court Decisions, 46 Kan. L. Rev. 241 (1998).Google Scholar
Valencia-Weber, Gloria, Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez: Twenty-Five Years of Disparate Cultural Visions: An Essay Introducing the Case for Re-argument before the American Indian Nations Supreme Court, 14 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 49 (2004).Google Scholar

Further Reading

Collins, Richard B., Indian Consent to American Government, 31 Ariz. L. Rev. 365 (1989).Google Scholar
Davis, Seth, American Colonialism and Constitutional Redemption, 105 Calif. L. Rev. 1751 (2017).Google Scholar
Fredericks, Carla F. & Heibel, Jesse D., Standing Rock, the Sioux Treaties, and the Limits of the Supremacy Clause, 89 U. Colo. L. Rev. 477 (2018).Google Scholar
Frickey, Philip, Domesticating Federal Indian Law, 81 Minn. L. Rev. 31 (1996).Google Scholar
Newton, Nell Jessup, Federal Power over Indians: Its Sources, Scope, and Limitations, 132 U. Penn. L. Rev. 195 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Robert Odawi, The Inapplicability of American Law to the Indian Nations, 89 Iowa L. Rev. 1595 (2004).Google Scholar
Riley, Angela R., Good (Native) Governance, 107 Colum. L. Rev. 1049 (2007).Google Scholar
Saito, Natsu Taylor, The Plenary Power Doctrine: Subverting Human Rights in the Name of Sovereignty, 51 Cath. U.L. Rev. 1115 (2002).Google Scholar
Singel, Wenona, The First Federalists, 62 Drake L. Rev. 775 (2014).Google Scholar
Skibine, Alex Tallchief, Formalism and Judicial Supremacy in Federal Indian Law, 32 Am. Indian L. Rev. 391 (2008).Google Scholar
Skibine, Alex Tallchief, Constitutionalism, Federal Common Law, and the Inherent Powers of Indian Tribes, 39 Am. Indian L. Rev. 77 (2015).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert A. Jr., Like a Loaded Weapon: The Rehnquist Court, Indian Rights, and the Legal History of Racism in America (University of Minnesota Press 2005).Google Scholar

Further Reading

Creel, Barbara, The Right to Counsel for Indians Accused of a Crime: A Tribal and Congressional Imperative, 18 Mich. J. Race & L. 317 (2013).Google Scholar
Ennis, Samuel, Reaffirming Indian Tribal Court Criminal Jurisdiction over Non-Indians: An Argument for a Statutory Abrogation of Oliphant, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 553 (2009).Google Scholar
Kronk, Elizabeth, The Emerging Problem of Methamphetamine: A Threat Signaling the Need to Reform Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country, 82 N.D. L. Rev. 1249 (2006).Google Scholar
Lewis, Brian L., Do You Know What You Are? You Are What You Is; You Is What You Am: Indian Status for the Purpose of Federal Criminal Jurisdiction and the Current Split in the Courts of Appeals, 26 Harv. J. Racial & Ethnic Just. 241 (2010).Google Scholar
Monette, Richard, Indian Country Jurisdiction and the Assimilative Crimes Act, 69 Or. L. Rev. 269 (1990).Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith, Tribes, Wars, and the Federal Courts: Applying the Myths and the Methods of Marbury v. Madison to Tribal Courts’ Criminal Jurisdiction, 36 Ariz. St. L.J. 77 (2005).Google Scholar
Schiffler, Molly, Women of Color and Crime: A Critical Race Theory Perspective to Address Disparate Prosecution, 56 Ariz. L. Rev. 1203 (2014).Google Scholar
Washburn, Kevin, Federal Criminal Law and Tribal Self-Determination, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 779 (2006).Google Scholar

Further Reading

Christensen, Grant, Judging Indian Law: What Factors Influence Individual Justice’s Votes on Indian Law in the Modern Era, 43 U. Tol. L. Rev. 267 (2012).Google Scholar
Epps, Daniel & Ortman, William, The Lottery Docket, 116 Mich. L. Rev. 705 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Adam & Kappner, Alexander, Finding Certainty in Cert: An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Involved in Supreme Court Certiorari Decisions from 2001–2005, 61 Vill. L. Rev. 795 (2016).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M., The Supreme Court’s Indian Problem, 59 Hastings L.J. 579 (2008).Google Scholar
Grant, Emily, Hendrickson, Scott A., and Lynch, Michael S., The Ideological Divide: Conflict and the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decision, 60 Cle. St. L. Rev. 559 (2012).Google Scholar
Hermann, John R., American Indian Interests and Supreme Court Agenda Setting: 1969–1992 October Terms, 25 Am. Pol. Q. 241 (1997).Google Scholar
Hermann, John R. & O’Connor, Karen, American Indians and the Burger Court, 77 Soc. Sci. Q. 127 (1996).Google Scholar
Kramer, Karl J., Comment, The Most Dangerous Branch: An Institutional Approach to Understanding the Role of the Judiciary in American Indian Jurisdictional Determinations, 1986 Wis. L. Rev. 989 (1986).Google Scholar
O’Brien, David M., Join-3 Votes, the Rule of Four, the Cert. Pool, and the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Plenary Docket, 13 J.L. & Politics 779 (1997).Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, The “Bermuda Triangle?” The Cert Pool and Its Influence over the Supreme Court’s Agenda, 18 Const. Commentary 105 (2006).Google Scholar
Riley, Angela, The History of Native American Lands and the Supreme Court, 38 J. Sup. Ct. Hist. 369 (2013).Google Scholar
Skibine, Alexander Tallchief, The Supreme Court’s Last 30 Years of Federal Indian Law: Looking for Equilibrium or Supremacy?, 8 Colum. J. Race & L. 22 (2018).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×