Book contents
- Reconstructing Empedocles’ Thought
- Reconstructing Empedocles’ Thought
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Reconstructing Empedocles’ On Nature
- Chapter 2 The Proem to On Nature
- Chapter 3 Daimones between Plato and Pythagoras
- Chapter 4 Divine Beings
- Chapter 5 Changes of Form, Personal Survival and Rebirth
- Chapter 6 Knowing Nature as a God
- Chapter 7 Cosmic Cycle, Moral Import and Rebirth
- Chapter 8 Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2024
Book contents
- Reconstructing Empedocles’ Thought
- Reconstructing Empedocles’ Thought
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Reconstructing Empedocles’ On Nature
- Chapter 2 The Proem to On Nature
- Chapter 3 Daimones between Plato and Pythagoras
- Chapter 4 Divine Beings
- Chapter 5 Changes of Form, Personal Survival and Rebirth
- Chapter 6 Knowing Nature as a God
- Chapter 7 Cosmic Cycle, Moral Import and Rebirth
- Chapter 8 Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reconstructing Empedocles' Thought , pp. 372 - 395Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Allen, R. E. and Furley, D. J. (eds.) 1975. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, II. The Eleatics and Pluralists. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Althoff, J. (ed.) 2007. Philosophie und Dichtung im antiken Griechenland. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann. Karl und Gertrud Abel Stiftung, Bernkastel-Kues, 10–11. Oktober 2002. Stuttgart. Steiner.Google Scholar
Althoff, J., Foellinger, S. and Woehrle, G. (eds.) 2020. AKAN – Antike Naturwissenschaft und Ihre Rezeption 30. Trier. WVT.Google Scholar
Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.) 1983. Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, vol. 2. Albany, NY. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. 1987. Poeti, Eruditi e Biografi. Momenti della Riflessione dei Greci sulla Letteratura. Pisa. Giardini Editore.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. 1997. Esiodo, Le Opere e i Giorni; lo Scudo di Eracle. Milano. Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. and Tulli, M. (eds.) 2000. Letteratura e Riflessione sulla Letteratura nella Cultura Classica. Pisa. Giardini Editore.Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. (ed.) 1987. Études sur Parménide, vol. 2: Problèmes d’Interprétation. Paris. Vrin.Google Scholar
Aune, D. E. and Young, D. (eds.) 2007. Reading Religions in the Ancient World. Essays Presented to Robert McQueen Grant on his 90th Birthday. Leiden. Brill.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1979. ‘Parmenides and the Eleatic One’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. and King, C. K. (eds.) 2020. Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Battezzato, L. 2005. ‘Le Vie dell’ Ade e le Vie di Parmenide. Filologia, Filosofia e Presenze Femminili nelle Lamine d’Oro “Orfiche”’. Seminari Romani 8: 67–99.Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin. Weidmann.Google Scholar
Benzi, N. 2016. ‘Noos and Mortal Enquiry in the Poetry of Xenophanes and Parmenides’. Methodos 16: 1–19.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2002a. ‘Orphisme et Présocratiques: Bilan et Perspectives d’un Dialogue Complexe’, in Laks, A. and Louguet, C. (eds.): 205–47.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2002b. ‘La Toile de Pénélope: a-t-il Existé un Mythe Orphique sur Dionysos et les Titans?’ Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 219.4: 401–33.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2003. Hieros Logos. Poesía Órfica sobre los Dioses, el Alma y el Más Allá. Madrid. Akal.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2004. Textos Órficos y Filosofía Presocrática: Materiales para una Comparación. Madrid. Trotta.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2004–2007. Poetae Epici Graeci: Testimonia et Fragmenta, München, Leipzig and Berlin. Teubner (Pars. II, Fasc. 1, München and Leipzig. Teubner 2004. Fasc. 2. München and Leipzig. Teubner 2005, Fasc. 3. Berlin. Teubner 2007).Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2011. ‘La Transmigración entre los Órficos’, in Bernabé, A., Kahle, M. and Santamaría, M. A. (eds.): 179–210.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and Casadesús, F. (eds.) 2008. Orfeo y la Tradición Órfica: Un Reencuentro. Madrid. Akal.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A., Casadesús, F. and Santamaría, M. A. (eds.) 2009. Orfeo y el Orfismo: Nuevas Perspectivas. Alicante. Biblioteca Virtual M. Cervantes.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and Jiménez, A. I. (eds.) 2008. Instructions for The Netherworld. The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden and Boston. Brill.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A., Kahle, M. and Santamaría, M. A. (eds.) 2011. Reencarnación: la Transmigración de las Almas entre Oriente y Occidente. Madrid. Abada Editores.Google Scholar
Berra, A. 2006. ‘Pythagoras’ Riddles. The Use of the Pythagorean Akousmata’, in Galewicz, C. (ed.): 259–72.Google Scholar
Beta, S. (ed.) 2006. I Poeti Credevano nelle loro Muse? Atti della Giornata di Studio, Siena 2 Aprile 2003. Fiesole. Cadmo: il Ramo d’Oro.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2001. ‘Empédocle, Orphée et le Papyrus de Derveni’, in Morel, P. M. and Pradeau, J.-F. (eds.): 45–70.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2004. The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. 2006. ‘Eschatology and Cosmology: Models and Problems’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.): 27–50.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2009. ‘The Limits of the Soul: Heraclitus B45 DK. Its Text and Interpretation’, inHülsz, E. P.(ed.): 391–414.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2014a. ‘Pythagoreans and the Derveni Author’, in Sheffield, F. and Warren, J. (eds.): 79–93.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2014b. ‘Pythagoreans, Orphism and Greek Religion’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.): 149–66.Google Scholar
Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K. (eds.) 2007. Literatur und Religion 1 und 2: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen. Berlin. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. 1916. Empedocle. Studio Critico, Traduzione e Commento delle Testimonianze e dei Frammenti. Torino. Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar
Bodrero, E. 1904. Il Principio Fondamentale del Sistema di Empedocle. Roma. Forzani & C.Google Scholar
Boehm, F. 1905. De symbolis Pythagoreis. Diss. Berlin. Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität.Google Scholar
Bollack, J. 1965–1969. Empédocle, vols. I, II, III.1–2. (1965. Vol. I Introduction à l’Ancienne Physique; 1969. Vol. II Les Origins: Édition et Traduction des Fragments et des Témoignages; 1969. Vol. III Les Origines. Commentaire 1–2) Paris. Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bollack, J. 2003. Empédocle. Les Purifications: un Projet de Paix Universelle. Paris. Seuil.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. (ed.) 1991. Orphisme et Orphée: en l’Honneur de Jean Rudhardt. Genève. Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Brann, E. T. H. 2011. The Logos of Heraclitus: The First Philosopher of the West on Its Most Interesting Term. Philadelphia, PA. Paul Dry Books.Google Scholar
Bredlow, L. A. 2011. ‘Aristotle, Theophrastus and Parmenides’ Theory of Cognition (B 16)’. Apeiron 44: 219–63.Google Scholar
Bremer, D. and Dilcher, R. 2013. ‘Heraklit’, in Flashar, H., Bremer, D. and Rechenauer, G. (eds): 601–56.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 2017. ‘Descents to the Underworld from Gilgamesh to Christian Late Antiquity’. Studia Religiologica 50.4: 291–309.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1973. ‘“A Most Strange Doctrine”. Daimon in Plutarch’. The Classical Journal 69.1: 1–11.Google Scholar
Brillante, C. 2006. ‘Le Muse tra Verità, Menzogna e Finzione’, in Beta, S. (ed.): 27–58.Google Scholar
Brillante, C. 2009. Il Cantore e la Musa: Poesia e Modelli Culturali nella Grecia Arcaica. Pisa. ETS.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2002. Sexual Ambivalence: Androgyny and Hermaphroditism in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berkeley, CA. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2009. ‘Zeus Did Not Commit Incest with His Mother. An Interpretation of Col. XXVI of the Derveni Papyrus’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 168: 27–39.Google Scholar
Brunius Nilsson, E. 1955. Daimonie, an Inquiry into a Mode of Apostrophe in Old Greek Literature. Uppsala, Sweden. Almquist und Wiksell.Google Scholar
Bruschi, R. (ed.) 2007. Gli Irraggiungibili Confini. Percorsi della Psiche nell’età della Grecia Classica. Pisa. ETS.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. 2012. Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1969. ‘Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras’. Phronesis 14.1: 1–30.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B., Cook, S. A. and Adcock, F. E. (eds.) 1926. Cambridge Ancient History, IV. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1995. The Craft of Poetic Speech in Ancient Greece. Ithaca. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Calzolari, A. 1984. ‘Empedocle, Frr. 2 e 3 Diels-Kranz’. Studi Classici e Orientali 34: 71–81.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. 2000. ‘Zoogony and Evolution in Plato’s Timaeus. The Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.): 145–80.Google Scholar
Casabona, J. 1966. Recherches sur le Vocabulaire des Sacrifices en Grec, des Origines à la Fin de l’Époque Classique. Aix-en-Provence. Ophrys.Google Scholar
Casadesús, F. 2008. ‘El papiro de Derveni’, in Bernabé, A. and Casadesús, F. (eds.): 459–94.Google Scholar
Casadesús, F. 2010. ‘Similitudes entre el Papiro de Derveni y los Primeros Filósofos Estoicos’, in Bernabé, A., Casadesús, F. and Santamaría, M. A. (eds.): 192–239.Google Scholar
Casadesús, F. 2013. ‘On the Origin of the Orphic-Pythagorean Notion of the Immortality of the Soul’, inCornelli, , McKirahan, G., R. and Macris, C. (eds.): 153–76.Google Scholar
Casadio, G. 1991. ‘La Metempsicosi tra Orfeo e Pitagora’, in Borgeaud, P. (ed.): 119–55.Google Scholar
Castner, C. J. 1987. ‘De Rerum Natura 5. 101–103: Lucretius’ Application of Empedoclean Language to Epicurean Doctrine’. Phoenix 41.1: 40–49.Google Scholar
Caston, V. and Graham, D. W. (eds.) 2002. Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2007. ‘Il Ruolo di Eraclito nello Sviluppo della Concezione dell’Anima’, in Bruschi, E. (ed.): 131–49.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 1995. ‘Cosmologia dell’Ade in Omero, Esiodo e Parmenide’. Parola del Passato. 50, fasc. III–IV: 437–67.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 2004. ‘Empedocle, Fr. 3 D.-K.: Saggio di Esegesi Letterale’, in Rossetti, L. and Santaniello, C. (eds.): 83–94.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cherubin, R. 2005. ‘Light, Night and the Opinions of Mortals: Parmenides B 8.51–61 and B 9’. Ancient Philosophy 25: 1–23.Google Scholar
Chitwood, A. 1986. ‘The Death of Empedocles’. American Journal of Philology 107.2: 175–91.Google Scholar
Chitwood, A. 2004. Death by Philosophy. The Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. 2010. ‘Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains’, in Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H. (eds.): 170–87.Google Scholar
Conche, M. 1996. Parménide. Le Poème. Fragments. Paris. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Conger, G. P. 1922. Theories of Macrocosms and Microcosms in the History of Philosophy. New York, NY. Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Cook, A. B. 1925. Zeus: A Study in Ancient Religion, 2 vols. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelli, G., McKirahan, R. and Macris, C. (eds.) 2013. On Pythagoreanism. Berlin. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1926. ‘Mystery Religions and Pre-Socratic Philosophy’, in Bury, J. B., Cook, S. A. and Adcock, F. E. (eds.): 522–78.Google Scholar
Cornford, F.M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato. New York, NY. Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Cornford, F.M. 1952. Principium Sapientiae. The Origins of Greek Philosophical Thought. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cosenza, P. 1985. ‘Demone e Sorte nella Scuola Pitagorica’, in AA. VV. (ed.) Esistenza e Destino nel Pensiero Greco Arcaico. Napoli. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: 7–31.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R. 2011. ‘The Unknown “Knowing Man”: Parmenides, B 1.3’. Classical Quarterly 61: 28–47.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. 2009. The Fragments of Parmenides. A Critical Text with Introduction, Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Revised and expanded edition by R. McKirahan. Las Vegas, NV, Zurich and Athens. Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Crisp, P. 2005. ‘Allegory, Blending, and Possible Situations’. Metaphor and Symbol 20.5: 115–31.Google Scholar
Curd, P. K. 1992. ‘Deception and Belief in Parmenides’ Doxa’. Apeiron 25.2: 109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curd, P.K. 1998. The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Las Vegas, NV. Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Curd, P.K. 2001. ‘A New Empedocles? Implications of the Strasbourg Fragments for Presocratic Philosophy’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 17.1: 27–49.Google Scholar
Curd, P.K. 2002. ‘The Presocratics as Philosophers’, in Laks, A. and Loguet, C. (eds.): 115–38.Google Scholar
Curd, P.K. 2005. ‘On the Question of Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 137–62.Google Scholar
Curd, P.K. 2016. ‘Powers, Structure and Thought in Empedocles’. Rhizomata 4 .1: 55–79.Google Scholar
Curd, P. K. and Graham, D. W. (eds.) 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. 1995. ‘Una Via Lontana dal Cammino degli Uomini (Parm. 28 B 1+6; Pind. Ol. VI 22–27; Pae. VIIb 10–20)’. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 88: 143–81.Google Scholar
Darcus, S. M. 1977. ‘Daimon Parallels the Holy Phren in Empedocles’. Phronesis 22.3: 175–90.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. 1958. Parmenides’ Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts. Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts. Wiesbaden. Steiner.Google Scholar
Delatte, A. 1934. ‘Les Conceptions de l’Enthousiasme chez les Philosophes Présocratiques’. L’Antiquité Classique 3.1: 5–79.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1959. ‘La “Démonologie” d’Empédocle’. Revue des Études Grecques 72: 1–17.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1963. La Notion du Daïmôn dans le Pythagorisme Ancien. Paris. Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1967. Les Maîtres de Vérité dans la Grèce Archaïque. Paris. François Maspero.Google Scholar
Di Donato, R. (ed.) 2013. Origini e Svolgimento del Pensiero Greco. Studi per Jean-Pierre Vernant. Pisa. RTS.Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1898. ‘Über die Gedichte des Empedokles’. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin I: 396–415 (= 1969: 127–46).Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1903. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch. Berlin. Reimer.Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1969. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie. Darmstadt. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. 1951. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch, vol. I and II, 6th edition. Berlin. Weidmann.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley and London. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drew Griffith, R. 1991. ‘Oedipus’s Bloodthirsty Sons: Love and Strife in Pindar’s Second “Olympian Ode”’. Classical Antiquity 10.1: 46–58.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. III 1999. ‘Tearing Apart the Zagreus Myth: A Few Disparaging Remarks on Orphism and Original Sin’. Classical Antiquity 18.1: 35–73.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R.G. III 2004. Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R.G. III 2011. The ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets and Greek Religion. Further along the Path. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elmer, D. F. 2010. ‘Kita and Kosmos: The Poetics of Ornamentation in Bosniac and Homeric Epic’. Journal of American Folklore 123: 276–303.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (ed.) 1990. Companions to Ancient Thought I: Epistemology. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (ed.) 1991. Companions to Ancient Thought II: Psychology. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fattal, M. 2005. Ricerche sul Logos da Omero a Plotino (trans. R. Radice). Milano. Bompiani.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2013. ‘Il Giorno Spietato e l’Esilio dagli Dei: a Proposito di Alcuni Frammenti Demonologici’, in Di Donato, R. (ed.): 29–47.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2017. ‘Waking up Sleeping Metaphors: A Cognitive Approach to Parmenides’ two Ways of Enquiry’. eTopoi. Journal of Ancient Studies 6: 107–30.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2018b. ‘“A Path for Understanding”: Journey-Metaphors in (Three) Early Greek Philosophers’, in Ferella, C. and Breytenbach, C. (eds.): 45–71.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2019a. ‘Empedocles and the Birth of Trees: Reconstructing PStrasb. gr. inv. 1665–6, ens. d-f 10b-18’. Classical Quarterly 69.1: 75–86.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2019b. ‘Zeus’ μοῦνος and Parmenides’ what-is’, in Santamaría, M. A. (ed.): 65–74.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. 2020. ‘War Steers the World: The Metaphor Domain of Conflict in Heraclitus’ and Empedocles’ Representations of the Cosmos’, in Althoff, J., Foellinger, S. and Woehrle, G. (eds.): 9–34.Google Scholar
Ferella, C. and Breytenbach, C. (eds.) 2018. Paths of Knowledge. Interconnection(s) between Knowledge and Journey in the Graeco-Roman World. Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 60. Berlin. Edition Topoi.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. .2005. ‘L’Officina Epica di Parmenide: Due Sondaggi’. Seminari Romani 8: 113–29.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2010. Il Migliore dei Mondi Impossibili: Parmenide e il Cosmo dei Presocratici. Roma. Aracne.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2011. ‘Frustoli Erranti: per una Ricostruzione delle Colonne I-III del Papiro di Derveni’, in Funghi, M. S. (ed.): 39–54.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, B. 1984. ‘Zur Wegmetaphorik beim Goldblättchen aus Hipponion und dem Proömium des Parmenides’. Rheinisches Museum 127: 1–22.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. ‘Frame Semantics’, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981 (p. 111). Seoul. Hanshin Pub. Co. 111–37.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. 1997. ‘Xenophanes’ Physics, Parmenides’ Doxa and Empedocles’ Theory of Cosmogonical Mixture’. Hermes 125.1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. 1999. ‘Being, Truth and Opinion in Parmenides’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81.3: 233–48.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. .2013. ‘Heraclitus, the Rival of Pythagoras’, in Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.): 147–62.Google Scholar
Flashar, H., Bremer, D. and Rechenauer, G. (eds.) 2013. Die Philosophie der Antike. Band I: Frühgriechische Philosophie. Basel. Schwabe.Google Scholar
Föllinger, S. 2007. ‘Die Funktion von Nicht-Wissen in der Frühgriechischen Literatur’, in Althoff, J. (ed.): 53–65.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. and Gutas, D. (eds.) 1992. Theophrastus. His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1955. Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. Literarische und Philosophiegeschichtliche Studien. München. Beck.Google Scholar
Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.) 2009. Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin and New York, NY. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Funghi, M. S. (ed.) 2011. Papiri filosofici. Miscellanea di Studi 6. Firenze. Olschki.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. 1956. ‘The Early History of the Concept of Soul’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 3.1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Furley, D.J. 1970. ‘Variation on Themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ Proem’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 17: 55–64. (= reprinted in Furley 1989a: 172–82).Google Scholar
Furley, D.J. 1989a. Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greeks and Roman Philosophy of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furley, D.J. 1989b. ‘Truth as What Survives the Elenchos: An Idea in Parmenides’, in Huby, P. and Neal, G. (eds.) The Criterion of Truth. Liverpool. Liverpool University Press: 1–12.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E. (eds.) 1970. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. The Beginnings. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Furley, D.J. and Allen, R.E. .(eds.) 1974. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. The Eleatics and Pluralists. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. and Bremer, J. M. 2001. Greek Hymns. Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period, I–II. Tübingen. Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things. The Georgics, Lucretius and Didactic Tradition. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galewicz, C. (ed.) 2006. Texts of Power, the Power of the Text. Readings in Textual Authority across History and Cultures. Kraków. Homini.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (ed.) 1996. Plutarco e la Religione, Atti del VI Convegno Plutarcheo (Ravello, 29–31 maggio 1995). Napoli. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Garani, M. 2007. Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York, NY and London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H. (eds.) 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2001. ‘Le “Demonologie” Empedoclee: Problemi di Metodo e Altro’. Aevum Antiquum N. S. 1: 205–35.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M.L. 2002. ‘Le Contexte Culturel des Présocratiques: Adversaires et Destinataires’, in Laks, A. and Louguet, C. (eds.): 85–114.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M.L. 2005. ‘Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 373–404.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M.L. 2007a. ‘Lire du Début. Quelques Observations sur les Incipit des Présocratiques’. Philosophie Antique 7: 7–37.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M.L. 2007b. Die Vorsokratiker I. Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes, Pythagoras und die Pythagoreer, Xenophanes, Heraklit. Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen. Düsseldorf. Artemis & Winkler.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M.L. 2009. Die Vorsokratiker II. Parmenides, Zenon, Empedokles. Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen. Düsseldorf. Artemis & Winkler.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M.L. 2014. ‘The Pythagorean Way of Life and Pythagorean Ethics’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.): 131–48.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. 2013. Pindaro, Le Olimpiche. Milano. Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar
Gheerbrandt, X. 2017. Empédocle: une Poétique Philosophique. Paris. Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. 1971. ‘Sull’ Olimpica Seconda di Pindaro’. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 99: 26–52.Google Scholar
Gianvittorio, L. 2010. Il Discorso di Eraclito. Un Modello Semantico nel Passaggio dall’Oralità alla Scrittura. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY. Olms.Google Scholar
Gnoli, G. and Sfameni Gasparro, G. (eds.) 2009. Potere e Religione nel Mondo Indo-Mediterraneo tra Ellenismo e Tarda-antichità. Roma. ISIAO.Google Scholar
Goedde, S. 2007. ‘Ou moi hosion esti legein: zur Poetik der Leerstelle in Herodots Aegypten-Logos’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K. (eds.): 40–83.Google Scholar
Goergemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. (eds.) 1976. Studien zum Antiken Epos. Meisenhaim Am Glan. Hain.Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. 1906. Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, vol. 1 (trans. by L. Magnus). London. Murray.Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. 1924. Psychologische Beobachtungen an griechischen Philosophen. Leipzig. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Graf, F. and Johnston, S. I. 2013. Ritual Texts for the Afterlife. Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets, 2nd edition. Abingdon and New York, NY. Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 1988. ‘Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle’. Classical Quarterly 38.2: 297–312.Google Scholar
Graham, D.W. 1999. ‘Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides’, in Long, A. A. (ed.): 159–80.Google Scholar
Graham, D.W. 2005. ‘The Topology and Dynamics of Empedocles’ Cycle’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 225–44.Google Scholar
Graham, D.W. 2008. Explaining the Cosmos. The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D.W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 2013. ‘Xenophanes’ Positive Theology and His Criticism of Greek Popular Religion’. Ancient Philosophy 33: 235–71.Google Scholar
Grube, G.M.A. 1965. The Greek and Roman Critics. Toronto. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1957. In the Beginning: Some Greek Views on the Origins of Life and the Early State of Man. London. Methuen.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. I. The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1965. A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. II. The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, R. 1952. ‘Zur Eschatologie in Pindars zweiter Olympischer Ode’. ERMHNEIA. Festschrift für O. Regenbogen. Heidelberg: 46–55.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1995. ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos’. Classical Quarterly 45: 204–14.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. 1958. ‘Parmenides and Odysseus’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63: 133–43.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A. 1912–1913. ‘On Certain Fragments of the Pre-Socratics: Critical Notes and Elucidations’. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 48: 681–734.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, A. 2011. ‘Dionysos Dismembered and Restored to Life. The Earliest Evidence (OF 59 I-II)’, in Herrero De Jáuregui, M., Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., Luján Martínez, E. R., Hernández, R. M., Santamaría, M. A. and Torallas Tovar, S. (eds.): 61–68.Google Scholar
Herrero De Jáuregui, M., Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., Luján Martínez, E. R., Hernández, R. M., Santamaría, M. A. and Torallas Tovar, S. (eds.) 2011. Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic Fragments. Berlin. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hladký, V. 2015. ‘Empedocles’ Sphairos and Its Interpretations in Antiquity, II: Plato’s Timaeus and Statesman’. Eirene. Studia Greca et Latina 51: 71–98.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. 1965. ‘Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie’. Hermes 93.1: 7–33.Google Scholar
Horn, F. 2015. ‘Sleeping the Brazen Slumber: A Cognitive Approach to Hom. Il. 11.241’. Philologus 159.2: 197–206.Google Scholar
Huby, P. and Neal, G. (eds.) 1989. The Criterion of Truth: Essays Written in Honor of George Kerferd, together with a Text and Translation (With Annotations) of Ptolemy’s On the Kriterion and Hegemonikon. Liverpool. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C.A. 2008. ‘Heraclitus’ Critique of Pythagoras’ Enquiry in Fragment 129’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 19–47. 2009. ‘The Pythagorean Conception of the Soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus’, in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.): 21–43.Google Scholar
Huffman, C.A. 2011. ‘Pythagoras’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Online Resource. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/pythagoras/ [last accessed 7 August 2023].Google Scholar
Huffman, C.A. .(ed.) 2014. A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hüffmeier, A. 2001. Die pythagoreischen Sprüche in Porphyrios’ Vita Pythagorae Kapitel 36 (Ende) bis 45. Diss. Münster.Google Scholar
Hülsz, E. P. (ed.) 2009. Nuevos ensayos sobre Heráclito: Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum, Mexico City. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1990. ‘The Beginning of Epistemology: From Homer to Philolaus’, in Everson, S. (ed.): 11–38.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2005. ‘Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 1–37.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2001. The Poem of Empedocles. A Text and Translation with an Introduction, Revised Edition. Toronto, Buffalo and London. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2009. ‘Empedocles and Metempsychosis: The Critique of Diogenes of Oenoanda’, in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.): 71–86.Google Scholar
Iribarren Baralt, L. and Koning, H. H. (eds.) 2022. Hesiod and the Beginnings of Greek Philosophy. Leiden and Boston, MA. Brill.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1947. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, M. H. 1988. ‘Sacrifice and Animal Husbandry in Classical Greece’. Pastoral Economies in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge Philological Society, Supplementary Vol. 14: 87–119.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2004. ‘Empedocles, On Nature I 233–364: A New Reconstruction of P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–6’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 150: 1–26.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2005. ‘Empedocles’ Physika Book I: A New Reconstruction’. In Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 93–135.Google Scholar
Jarcho, V. N. 1968. ‘Zum Menschenbild der nachhomerischen Dichtung’. Philologus 112: 147–72.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I. 1999. Restless Dead. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA and London. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jourdan, F. 2003. Le papyrus de Derveni: Texte Présenté, Traduit et Annoté. Paris. Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1960. ‘Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42: 3–35 (= Reprinted in Mourelatos, A. P. D. [ed.]: 426–56).Google Scholar
Kahn, C.H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karsten, S. 1838. Empedoclis Agrigentini Carminum Reliquiae. De vita Eius et Studiis Disseruit, Fragmenta Explicuit, Philosophiam Illustravit. Amsterdam. Mueller.Google Scholar
Katz, A. and Taylor, T. E. 2008. ‘The Journeys of Life: Examining a Conceptual Metaphor with Semantic and Episodic Memory Recall’. Metaphor and Symbol 23: 148–73.Google Scholar
King, R. A. H. (ed.) 2006. Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin and New York, NY. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. 1995. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic. Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. 2002. ‘Empedocles for the New Millennium’. Ancient Philosophy 11.2 333–413.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1954. Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers. A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 2nd edition. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knatz, F. 1891. ‘Empedoclea’. Schedae Philologae Hermanno Usener a Sodalibus Seminarii Regii Bonnensis Oblatae. Bonn: 1–9.Google Scholar
Kotwick, M. E. 2017. Der Papyrus von Derveni. Griechisch-Deutsch. Berlin and Boston, MA. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T., Parássoglou, G. M. and Tsantsanoglou, K. 2006. The Derveni Papyrus, Firenze. Olschki.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kranz, W. 1916. Über Aufbau und Bedeutung des Parmenideischen Gedichtes. Berlin. Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kranz, W. 1935. ‘Vorsokratisches III: Die Katharmoi und die Physika des Empedokles’. Hermes 70.1: 111–19.Google Scholar
Kranz, W. 1949. Empedokles. Antike Gestalt und romantische Neuschöpfung. Zürich. Artemis.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. 2013. ‘Parmenides’, in Flashar, H., Bremer, D. and Rechenauer, G. (eds.): 441–530.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphor We Live By. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2004. La Vide et la Haine. Éléments pour une histoire archaïque de la négativité. Paris. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2005. ‘Some Thoughts about Empedoclean Cosmic and Demonic Cycles’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 265–82.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2018. The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy. Its Origin, Development and Significance. Transl. by G. W. Most. Princeton, NJ and Oxford. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Louguet, C. (eds.) 2002. Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique?/What Is Presocratic Philosophy? Lille. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lanata, G. 1963. Poetica Pre-platonica: Testimonianze e Frammenti. Firenze. La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1946. ‘Hesiods Dichterweihe’. Antike und Abendland 2: 152–63 (= 1968. Kleine Schriften. München. Beck: 60–75).Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1981. The Lives of the Greek Poets. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1981. ‘Perceiving and Knowing in the Iliad and Odyssey’. Phronesis 26.1: 2–24.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 1983. ‘Xenphanes’ Scepticism’, in Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.): 20–40.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 1984. ‘Parmenides’ Critique of Thinking: The Poludēris Elenchos of Fragment 7’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 1991. ‘Xenophanes on Inquiry and Discovery: An Alternative to the “Hymn to Progress” Reading of fr. 18’. Ancient Philosophy 2.2: 229–48.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 1992. Xenophanes of Colophon. Fragments. Toronto, Buffalo and London. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 1994. ‘The Emergence of Philosophical Interest in Cognition’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 1–34.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 2008. ‘The Humanizing of Knowledge in Presocratic Thought’, in Curd, P. K. and Graham, D. W. (eds.): 458–84.Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H. 2013. ‘A systematic Xenophanes?’, in McCoy, , J. (ed.), Early Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics and the Emergence of Reason. Washington, D.C. Catholic University of America Press: 77–90.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1963. ‘Who Is Attacked in “On Ancient Medicine”?’ Phronesis 8: 108–26.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1964. ‘The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 84: 92–106.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy. Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1975. ‘Alcmaeon and the Early History of Dissection’. Sudhoffs Archiv 59.2: 113–47.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 2015. Analogical Investigations. Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Reasoning. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1963. ‘The Seal of Posidippus’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 83: 75–99.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1985. ‘Pindar and the After-Life’. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 31, Pindare: 245–83.Google Scholar
Long, Alex 2019. Death and Immortality in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 1963. ‘The Principles of Parmenides’ Cosmogony’. Phronesis 8.2: 90–107.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 1966. ‘Thinking and Sense Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?’ Classical Quarterly 16.2: 256–76.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 1974. ‘Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the Sixties’, in Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.): 397–425.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. (ed.) 1999. The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 2015. Greek Models of Mind and Self. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Long, H. S. 1948. A Study of The Doctrine of Metempsychosis in Greece from Pythagoras to Plato. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. 1993. Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London and New York, NY. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. 1981. The Hippocratic Treatises On Generation, On the Nature of the Child, Diseases IV. A Commentary. Berlin and New York, NY. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luther, W. 1935. ‘Wahrheit’ und ‘Lüge’ im ältesten Griechentum. Borna and Leipzig. R. Noske.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, T. 2021. Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers: Reading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as Literature. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. S. 2003. Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Macris, C. and Skarsouli, P. 2012. ‘Knowledge and Powers of the Mysterious τις in Empedocles’ Fragment 129’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 75.3: 357–77.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1972. ‘Ambiguity in Empedocles B17, 3–5: A Suggestion’. Phronesis 17.1: 17–39.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1992. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden. Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1995. ‘Insight by Hindsight. Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 40: 225–32.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1996. ‘Aristote et la Structure du De Sensibus de Théophraste’. Phronesis 41: 158–88.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 2018. ‘A Discussion of a New Edition of the Early Greek Philosophers’. Mnemosyne 71: 515–36.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Primavesi, O. 2021. Die Vorsokratiker, Griechisch/Deusch. Ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert, 2nd edition (1st edition 2011). Stuttgart. Reclam.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. 2020. Aëtiana. An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts, vol. 5.3. Leiden. Brill.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. 1967. Heraclitus. Greek Text with a Short Commentary. Editio Maior. Merida. Los Andes University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A. and Primavesi, O. 1999. L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–1666). Introduction, Édition et Commentaire. With an English Summary. Strasbourg, Berlin and New York, NY. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D. 2010. Philosophy before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary, 2nd edition. Indianapolis, IN. Hackett.Google Scholar
Megino Rodríguez, C. 2005. Orfeo y el Orfismo en la Poesía de Empédocles. Madrid. UAM.Google Scholar
Megino Rodríguez, C. 2019. ‘Daimons in the Derveni Papyrus and Early Stoicism’, in Santamaría, M. A. (ed.): 30–44.Google Scholar
Messina, G. 2002. ‘Empedocle “Rivisitato”: Testo, Traduzione e Commento dei Frammenti di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–1666)’. Giornale di Metafisica, N.S. 24: 5–69.Google Scholar
Minar, E. L. Jr. 1949. ‘Parmenides and the World of Seeming’. American Journal of Philology 70.1: 41–55.Google Scholar
Minar, E.L. 1963. ‘Cosmic Periods in the Philosophy of Empedocles’. Phronesis 8.2: 127–45.Google Scholar
Minton, W. W. 1960. ‘Homer’s Invocations of the Muses: Traditional Patterns’. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 91: 292–309.Google Scholar
Mogyoródi, E. 2006. ‘Xenophanes’ Epistemology and Parmenides’ Quest for Knowledge’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.): 123–60.Google Scholar
Morel, P. M. and Pradeau, J.-F. (eds.) 2001. Les Anciens Savants. Études sur les Philosophies Préplatoniciennes. Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg n.12/2001. Strasbourg. Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2007. The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1997. ‘Hesiod’s Myth of the Five (or Three or Four) Races’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 104–27.Google Scholar
Most, G.W. 1999. ‘The Poetics of Early Greek Philosophy’, in Long, A. A. (ed.): 332–62.Google Scholar
Most, G.W. 2005. ‘The Stillbirth of a Tragedy: Nietzsche and Empedocles’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 31–44.Google Scholar
Most, G.W. 2006. Hesiod. Theogony, Works and Days, Testimonia. Cambridge, MA and London. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Most, G.W. 2007. ‘ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται: Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K. (eds.): 271–302.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.) 1974. The Pre-Socratics. A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City and New York, NY. Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A.P.D. 2008. The Route of Parmenides. Revised and expanded edition. Las Vegas, NV. Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990. ‘Hesiod and the Poetics of Pan-Hellenism’. Greek Mythology and Poetics. Chapter 3. Ithaca and London: 36–82. Available at: https://chs.harvard.edu/read/nagy-gregory-greek-mythology-and-poetics/ [last accessed 7 August 2023].Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1996. ‘Autorité et Auteur dans la Théogonie Hésiodique’, in Blaise, F., Judet de La Combe, P. and Rousseau, P. (eds.), Le Métier du Mythe. Lectures d’Hésiode. Lille. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion: 41–52.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 2002. ‘Parmenidean Being/Heraclitean Fire’, in Caston, V. and Graham, D. W. (eds.): 45–64.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. 2017. ‘Empedocles’ “Roots” in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’. American Journal of Philosophy 138.1: 85–105.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. P. 1967. Geschichte der griechischen Religion. Vol. 1. 3rd edition. München. Beck.Google Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. 1988. ‘Immortality in Acragas: Poetry and Religion in Pindar’s Second Olympian’. Classical Philology 8.1: 1–19.Google Scholar
Nucci, M. 2005. ‘L’Empedocle di Strasburgo. La Questione delle tre Theta’. Elenchos 26.2: 379–401.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1969. Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. A Reconstruction from the Fragments and Secondary Sources. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1970. ‘Empedocles’ Theory of Seeing and Breathing: The Effect of a Simile’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 90: 140–79.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 2001. ‘Empedocles, the Wandering Daimon and the Two Poems’. Aevum Antiquum, N. S. 1: 79–179.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 2002. ‘Die Aristophanes-Rede im Symposium: der Empedokleische Hintergrund und seine philosophische Bedeutung’, in Janka, M. and Schäfer, C. (eds.), Platon als Mythologe, Neue Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen. Darmstadt. WBG: 176–93.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 2006. ‘Life Beyond the Stars: Aristotle, Plato and Empedocles – (De Caelo 1.9 279a11-22)’, in King, R. A. H. (ed.): 49–102.Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. V. 1993. The Transformation of Hera: A Study of Ritual, Hero, and the Goddess in the Iliad. Lanham, MD. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1960. ‘Eleatic Questions’, in Allen, R. E. and Furley, D. J. (eds.): 48–81.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. 2009. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. 2018. ‘Presocratic Interest in the Soul’s Persistence after Death’, in Sisko, J. E. (ed.): 23–43.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. 2020. ‘Ethics and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’, in Wolfsdorf, D. C. (ed.): 54–73.Google Scholar
Panzerbieter, F. 1844. ‘Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Empedokles’, in Einladungs-Programm des Gymnasium Bernhardinum in Meiningen zu der öffentlichen Prüfung. Meiningen: 1–35.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1983. Miasma. Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patroni, G. 1940. ‘La Voce DAIMΩN In Omero’. Reale Accademia d’Italia, classe di Scienze Morali e Storiche 7.1., Fasc. 7–9: 99–104.Google Scholar
Pellikaan Engel, M. E. 1978. Hesiod and Parmenides. A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides’ Proem. Amsterdam. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A. and Casadesús, F. (eds.) 2001. Estudio sobre Plutarco. Misticismo y Religiones Mistéricas en la Obra de Plutarco (Actas del VII Simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Palma de Mallorca, 2–4 Nov. 2000). Madrid and Málaga. Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2004. ‘Les Cinq Sources dont Parle Empédocle’. Revue des Études Grecques 117.2: 393–446.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2006. ‘Aristote, Poétique 1457 b 13–14 : la Métaphore d’Espèce à Espèce’. Revue des Études Grecques 119.2: 532–51.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2007. ‘Empedocles, Fragment 115.3: Can One of the Blessed Pollute His Limbs with Blood?’, in Gillet, S. S. and Corrigan, K. (eds.), Reading Ancient Texts, I: Presocratics and Plato, Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien. Leiden-Boston. Brill: 41–56.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2008. ‘La Brillance de Nestis (Empédocle, Fr. 96)’. Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 26.1: 75–100.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2012. ‘Apollon et la φρὴν ἱερὴ καὶ ἀθέσφατος (Empédocle, fr. 134 DK)’. Anais de Filosofia Clássica 6.11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2014. ‘Un Nom Énigmatique de l’Air chez Empédocle (fr. 21.4 DK)’. Les Études Philosophiques 3: 343–73.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. 2018. ‘Penser le Bien et le Mal avec Empédocle’. Chôra. Revue d’Études Anciennes et Médiévales 15–16: 381–414.Google Scholar
Pierris, A. L. (eds.) 2005. The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity, Part 1: Papers. Patras. Institute for Philosophical Research.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1992. ‘How the Moon Might Shed Some of Her Light upon the Two Ways of Parmenides’. Classical Quarterly 42: 12–19.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. 1993. Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2001. ‘La Daimonologia della Fisica Empedoclea’. Aevum Antiquum, N.S. I: 3–68.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2005. ‘The Structure of Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle: Aristotle and the Byzantine Anonymous’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.): 245–64.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2006a. ‘Apollo and Other Gods in Empedocles’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.): 51–77.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2006b. ‘Die Suda über die Werke des Empedokles’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 158: 61–75.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2007. ‘Zur Überlieferung und Bedeutung des Empedokleischen Titel “Καθαρμοί”’, in Vöhler, M. and Seidensticker, B. (eds.), Katharsiskonzeptionen vor Aristoteles. Zum kulturellen Hintergrund des Tragödiensatzes. Berlin. De Gruyter: 183–225.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2008a. Empedokles Physika I: eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. Berlin. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2008b. ‘Empedocles: Physical and Mythical Divinity’, in Curd, P. K. and Graham, D. W. (eds.): 250–83.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2013. ‘Empedokles’, in Flashar, H., Bremer, D. and Rechenauer, G. (eds.): 667–739.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2014. ‘Empedokleisches im Tod des Empedokles: Ein neuentdeckter Text des Vorsokratikers und Hölderlins Trauerspiel’, in Vollhardt, F. (ed.), Hölderlin in der Moderne. Kolloquium für Dieter Henrich zum 85. Geburtstag. Stuttgart. Erich Schmidt Verlag: 13–41.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2016. ‘Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle and the Pythagorean Tetractys’. Rhizomata 4: 5–29.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1977. Hesiod and the Language of Poetry. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 2007. Inno Alle Muse (Esiodo, Teogonia, 1–115). Testo, Introduzione, Traduzione e Commento. Pisa and Roma. Enrico Serra Editori.Google Scholar
Pugliese Carratelli, G. 2001. Le Lamine d’Oro Orfiche: Istruzioni per il Viaggio Oltremondano degli Iniziati Greci. Milano. Adelphi.Google Scholar
Radman, Z. (ed.) 1995. From a Metaphorical Point of View. A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor. Berlin and New York, NY. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rangos, S. 2012. ‘Empedocles on Divine Nature’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. 75.3: 315–38Google Scholar
Ranzato, S. 2015. Il Kouros e la Verità. Polivalenza delle Immagini nel Poema di Parmenide. Pisa. RTS.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2011. ‘Friedrich Nietzsche and Preplatonic Philosophy’, in Primavesi, O. and Luchner, K. (ed.), The Presocratics from Latin Middle Ages to Hermann Diels. Akten der 9. Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 5. –7. Oktober 2006 in München. Stuttgart. Steiner: 335–57.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2001. ‘La Chronographie du Système d’Empédocle: Documents Byzantins Inédits’. Aevum Antiquum N.S. I: 237–59.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2008. ‘Le Proème des Catharmes d’Empédocle. Reconstitution et Commentaire’. Elenchos 29.1: 7–37.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2011. ‘La Zoogonie de la Haine selon Empédocle: Retour sur l’ensemble « d » du papyrus d’Akhmim’. Phronesis 56: 33–57.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2014. ‘La Chronographie du Système d’Empédocle: Addenda et Corrigenda’. Les Études Philosophiques 110: 315–42.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2018. La Jeune Fille et la Sphère. Études sur Empédocle. Paris. Presses Universitaires de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Reid, H. L., Tanasi, D. and Kimbell, S. (eds.) 2016. Politics and Performance in Western Greece. Essays on the Hellenic Heritage of Sicily and Southern Italy. Sioux City, Iowa. Parnassos Press – Fonte Aretusa.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1974. ‘Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie’, in Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.): 293–311 (= 1916. Bonn. Friedrich Cohen Verlag).Google Scholar
Reis, B. (ed.) 2007. The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 2002. Pythagoras: Leben, Lehre, Nachwirkung. Eine Einführung. München. Beck.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. L. 2008. ‘X Is a Journey: Embodied Simulation in Metaphor Interpretation’. Metaphor and Symbol 23: 174–99.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. M. 2020. Underworld Gods in Ancient Greek Religion: Death and Reciprocity. London and New York, NY. Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. 1987. Heraclitus, Fragments. Toronto, Buffalo and London. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, T.M. 1995. Plato’s Psychology, 2nd edition. Toronto, Buffalo and London. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, T.M. 2008. ‘Presocratic Theology’, in Curd, P. K. and Graham, D. W. (eds.): 485–98.Google Scholar
Rocca Serra, G. 1987. ‘Parménide chez Diogène Laërce’, in Aubenque, P. (ed.), Études sur Parménide, vol. 2: Problèmes d’Interprétation. Paris. Vrin: 254–73.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 2006. Psyche. The Cult of Souls and Belief in Immortality among the Greeks. 2 vols, 2nd edition. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. 1994. The System of Public Sacrifice in Fourth Century Athens. Atlanta, GA. Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. and Santaniello, C. (eds.) 2004. Studi sul Pensiero e sulla Lingua di Empedocle. Bari. Levante.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D. 1975. Lucretius, De Rerum Natura. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rowett, , C. 1987a (writing under the name Osborne). ‘Empedocles Recycled’. Classical Quarterly 37.1: 24–50.Google Scholar
Rowett, 1987b (writing under the name Osborne). Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy. Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Ithaca and New York, NY. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rowett, 2000. (writing under the name Osborne). ‘Rummaging in the Recycling Bins of Upper Egypt: A Discussion of A. Martin and O. Primavesi, “L’Empédocle de Strasbourg”’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 329–56.Google Scholar
Rowett, 2005. (writing under the name Osborne). ‘Sin and Moral Responsibility in Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle’, in Pierris, A. L. (eds.): 283–308.Google Scholar
Rowett, 2016. ‘Love, Sex and the Gods: Why Things Have Divine Names in Empedocles’ Poem, and Why They Come in Pairs’. Rhizomata 4.1: 80–110.Google Scholar
Rundin, J. 1998. ‘The Vegetarianism of Empedocles in Its Historical Context’. The Ancient World 29.1: 19–36.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (ed.) 2005. Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santamaría, M. A. 2016. ‘La Catábasis de Pitágoras’. Emerita, Revista de Lingüística y Filología Clásica 84.1: 31–50.Google Scholar
Santamaria, M.A. (ed.) 2019. The Derveni Papyrus. Unearthing Ancient Mysteries. Leiden. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaria, M.A. 2022. ‘Divine Crime and Punishment: Breaking the Cosmic Law in Hesiod’s Theogony 783–806 and Empedocles’ Fragment DK B115’, in Iribarren Baralt, L. and Koning, H. H. (eds.): 294–312.Google Scholar
Santaniello, C. 1996. ‘Aspetti della Demonologia Plutarchea: tra il De defectu oraculorum e Altri Scritti del Corpus’, in Gallo, I. (ed.): 357–71.Google Scholar
Santaniello, C. 2001. ‘Faults Committed beyond This Life: Pindar and Empedocles in Plutarch’s Demonology’, in Pérez Jiménez, A. and Casadesús, F. (eds.): 255–68.Google Scholar
Santaniello, C. 2004. ‘Empedocle: Uno o Due Cosmi, Una o Due Zoogonie?’, in Rossetti, L. and Santaniello, C. (eds.): 23–81.Google Scholar
Santaniello, C. 2009. ‘Il Demone in Empedocle’, in Gnoli, G. and Sfameni Gasparro, G. (eds.): 329–361.Google Scholar
Sassi, M.M. 1988. ‘Parmenide al Bivio. Per un’ Interpretazione del Proemio’. Parola del Passato 43: 383–96.Google Scholar
Sassi, M.M. (ed.) 2006. La Costruzione del Discorso Filosofico nell’Età dei Presocratici/The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics [Secondo Symposium Praesocraticum, Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 16–18 Settembre 2004]. Pisa. Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Sassi, M.M. 2015. ‘Parmenides and Empedocles on Krasis and Knowledge’. Apeiron 49.4: 451–69.Google Scholar
Scapin, N. 2020. The Flower of Suffering. Theology, Justice, and the Cosmos in Aeschylus’ Oresteia and Presocratic Thought. Berlin and Boston, MA. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schäfer, C. 2009. ‘Das Pythagorasfragment des Xenophanes und die Frage nach der Kritik der Metempsychosenlehre’, in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.): 45–69.Google Scholar
Schibli, H.S. 1993. ‘Xenocrates’ Daemons and the Irrational Soul’. Classical Quarterly 43.1: 143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. 1991. ‘Heraclitus’ Theory of Soul and Its Antecedents’, in Everson, S. (ed.): 13–34.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1986. ‘Immortality, Salvation, and the Elements’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 1–26.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1989. ‘The Proems of Empedocles and Lucretius’. Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 269–96.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. 1992. ‘Empedocles’ Theory of Vision and Theophrastus’ De Sensibus’, in Fortenbaugh, W. and Gutas, D. (eds.): 20–31.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. 1998. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. 2003. ‘Lucretius and the New Empedocles’. Leeds International Classical Studies 2.4: 1–12.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley-Los Angeles, CA. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. and Warren, J. (eds.) 2014. The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. London and New York, NY. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2005. The Fragments of Anaxagoras. Introduction, Text, and Commentary, 2nd edition. Sankt Augustin. Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.) 2013. Doctrine and Doxography. Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin and Boston, MA. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sisko, J. E. (ed.) 2019. Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity. New York, NY and London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1924. Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie. Berlin. Weidmann.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1946. Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Hamburg. Claassen & Goverts.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1950. ‘Tissues and Soul. Philosophical Contribution to Physiology’. Philosophical Review 59: 435–68.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1963. ‘Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought’. Journal of the History of Ideas 24.4: 473–96.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1965. ‘Love and Strife in Empedocles’ Cosmology’. Phronesis 10.2: 109–48 (= 1982. Kleine Schriften I. Hildesheim. Olms: 274–313).Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1975. ‘Eternal and Temporary Beings in Empedocles’ Physical Poem’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57.2: 123–45 (= 1982. Kleine Schriften III, Hildesheim, Zürich and New York, NY. Olms: 176–98).Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1852. Empedocles Agrigentius. Fragmenta Disposuit, Recensuit, Adnotavit. Bonn. Friedrich Cohen Verlag.Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1857. Symbola Philologorum Bonnensium in Honorem Friderici Ritschelii Collecta. Fasciculus Posterior. Leipzig. Teubner.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1971. One and Many in Presocratic Philosophy. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. 1976. ‘Hesiod’s Lügende Musen’, in Goergemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. (eds.): 85–112.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2004. Birth of the Symbol. Ancient Readers and the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton, NJ and Oxford. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sturz, M. F. G. 1805. Empedocles Agrigentinus, de Vita et Philosophia eius Exposuit, Carmina Reliquias ex Antiquis Scriptoribus Collegit, Recensuit, 2 vols. Leipzig. Teubner.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. 1976. La parole et le Marbre. Aux Origines de la Poétique Grecque. Lund.Klassiska Institutionen.Google Scholar
Tabor, J. D. 2007. ‘Death as Life and Life as Death: Revisiting Rohde’, in Aune, D. E. and Young, D. (eds.): 27–38.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. 1930. Pour l’Histoire de la Science Hèllene, de Thalès à Empédocle, 2nd edition by Auguste Diès avec une Préface de M. Federigo Enriques. Paris. Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1965. Parmenides. A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. 2019. The Chronology of the Early Greek Natural Philosophers. North Haven, CT. Cosmographia.net.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 1994. ‘“Don’t Walk on the Highway”: The Pythagorean Akousmata and Early Christian Literature’. Journal of Biblical Literature 113.1: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, J.C. 2013. ‘The Pythagorean Akousmata and Early Pythagoreanism’, in Cornelli, G., McKirahan, R. and Macris, C. (eds.): 77–101.Google Scholar
Timpanaro Cardini, M. 1958. Pitagorici, Testimonianze e Frammenti. Fascicolo primo. Firenze. La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2017. Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology. A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tortorelli Ghidini, M. 2006. Figli della Terra e del Cielo Stellato: Testi Orfici con Traduzione e Commento. Napoli. M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2003a. ‘Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 1–57.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2003b. ‘“We” and Empedocles’ Cosmic Lottery: P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–1666, ensemble a’. Mnemosyne 56.4: 385–419.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2004. Empedocles. An Interpretation. New York, NY and London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2014. ‘From Wandering Limbs to Limbless Gods: δαίμων as Substance in Empedocles’. Apeiron 47.2: 172–210.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2017a. ‘From Hades to the Stars: Empedocles on the Cosmic Habitats of Soul’. Classical Antiquity 36.1: 130–82.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2017b. ‘Empedocles, On Nature 1.273–287. Place, the Elements and Still No “We”’. Mnemosyne 70: 562–84.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. 2020. ‘The Spirit in the Flesh: Empedocles on Embodied Soul’, in Bartoš, H. and King, C. K. (eds.): 80–105.Google Scholar
Tulli, M. 2000. ‘Esiodo nella Memoria di Parmenide’, in Arrighetti, G. and Tulli, M. (eds.): 5–23.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. 1958. Parmenide, Testimonianze e Frammenti. Introduzione, Traduzione e Commento. Firenze. La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. 2009. Caves and the Ancient Greek Mind: Descending Underground in the Search for Ultimate Truth. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Ben, N. 1975. The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri Physios. Towards a New Edition of All the Fragments. Amsterdam. Grüner.Google Scholar
Van Groningen, B. A. 1956. ‘Le Fragment 111 d’Empédocle’. Classica et Mediaevalia 17: 47–61.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1983. ‘Hesiod’s Myth of the Races: An Essay in Structural Analysis’, in Vernant, J.-P. (ed.), Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London and Boston, MA. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Vítek, T. 2001, 2006. Empedoklés, vol. I, II, III. (2001. Vol. I: Studie [Study]; 2006. Vol. II: Zlomky [Fragments], vol. III: Komentář [Commentary]). Praha. Herrmann & Synové.Google Scholar
Vítek, T. 2009. ‘The Origins of the Pythagorean Symbola’. Parola del Passato 64.4: 241–70.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1952. ‘Theology and Philosophy in Early Greek Thought’. Philosophical Quarterly 2.7: 97–123Google Scholar
Von Arnim, H. 1902. ‘Die Weltperioden bei Empedokles’. Festschrift Theodor Gomperz dargebracht zum siebzigsten Geburtstage. Aalen. Scientia Verlag: 16–27.Google Scholar
Von Fritz, K. 1945–1946. ‘Νοῦς, νοεῖν, and their Derivatives in pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras)’. Classical Philology 40.4 (1945): 223–42, and 41.1 (1946): 12–34 (= reprinted in Mourelatos, A. P. D. [ed.] 1974: 23–85).Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. 1957. ‘Estris hekaterōthi in Pindar’s Second Olympian and Pythagoras’ Theory of Metempsychosis’. Phronesis 2.2: 85–89.Google Scholar
Von Wilamowitz, U. 1929. ‘Die Καθαρμοί des Empedokles’. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 27: 626–61 (= 1935. Kleine Schriften I, Berlin. De Gruyter: 473–521).Google Scholar
West, M.L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, G. 2002. ‘Sing, Muse …: The Introit from Homer to Apollonius’. Classical Quarterly 52.1: 33–49.Google Scholar
Willi, A. 2008. Sikelismos. Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im Griechischen Sizilien (8.-5. Jh. v. Chr.). Basel. Schwabe.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. C. (ed.) 2020. Early Greek Ethics. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1958. ‘Parmenides on Names’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63: 145–60.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. 1962 (writing under the name Arundel). ‘Empedocles, fr. 35.12–15’. Classical Review 12.2: 109–11.Google Scholar
Wright, M.R. 1995. Empedocles. The Extant Fragments. Edited with an Introduction, Commentary, and Concordance, 2nd edition. New Haven and London. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, M.R. (ed.) 2000. Reason and Necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. London. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1844. Die Philosophie der Griechen, vol. I. 5th edition. Leipzig. Reisland.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1920. Die Philosophie der Griechen, 6th edition by Nestle, W.. Leipzig. Reisland.Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2014. ‘Sixth-, Fifth- and Fourth-Century Pythagoreans’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.): 88–111.Google Scholar
Zovko, M.-É. 2017. ‘Of Caves, Lines, and Sea Travels: Plato’s Syracusan Voyages and the Central Analogies of the Republic’, in Reid, H. L, Tanasi, D. and Kimbell, S. (eds.): 319–55.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. 1971. Persephone. Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar