Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2021
HUMAN RIGHTS BEYOND DIVIDE
As seen over the last several decades, the discourse on the nature and implications of ESC rights has been fraught with intense philosophical, political-ideological and cultural and practical controversies. In fact, a close look at academic literature reveals that such important notions as fundamental, basic, inherent, constitutional and negative rights are often employed with the intention to diminish the normative essence and significance of ESC rights as human rights. Although there are major progresses especially with respect to defending the significance of ESC rights using comparative arguments from civil and political rights, the controversy surrounding the normative foundation and practical significance of ESC rights for a given political society has not yet settled. In all this, the central point of contention revolves around two fundamental normative questions: first, whether or not ESC rights could be justified on the same normative (moral) argument and principle as civil and political rights and, second, the normative significance or implications of ESC rights in practice.
In relation to the first question, generally, different authors suggest the principle of autonomy or human dignity as a foundation (justification) of civil and political rights. It is generally accepted that those falling within the category of civil and political rights are considered as rights essentially connected with and hence flowing from the nature of human beings. This is to say that civil and political rights are inherent in or intrinsically associated with the moral fact of being human and hence are regarded as inherent (inalienable, real, fundamental or basic) human rights. But many seriously doubt if this is equally true with respect to ESC rights. Some authors categorically reject the idea that ESC rights are inherent human rights. It is obvious that to say ESC rights are not inherent human rights means they lack the essential character of being real and universal human rights. Thus, for some, ESC rights should best be described as welfare rights or programs for their existence and realisation are essentially the function of (or contingent up on) the nature of the political culture, availability of material resources and the existence of specific government policies to that effect.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.