Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:18:49.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 47 - Rehabilitation

from Section IV - Principles of Care for the Elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Jan Busby-Whitehead
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Samuel C. Durso
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University, Maryland
Christine Arenson
Affiliation:
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia
Rebecca Elon
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Mary H. Palmer
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
William Reichel
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

When age-related physical impairments affect a person’s performance of functional tasks, rehabilitation may restore function and improve an elder’s independence and participation in society. Included is a review of how to perform a functional assessment, a description of the members of a rehabilitation team, and an introduction to the various settings where an elder can receive rehabilitation. The chapter describes geriatric assistive devices that improve self-care and mobility and reviews specific rehabilitation interventions for common debilitating conditions such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, hip fracture, and lower-extremity amputation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reichel's Care of the Elderly
Clinical Aspects of Aging
, pp. 578 - 592
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lunney, JR, Lynn, J, Hogan, C. Profiles of older Medicare decedents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002; 50:11081112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization, Health Topics on Disabilities. www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en. Accessed on 03/22/2020.Google Scholar
Mosqueda, LA. Assessment of rehabilitation potential. Clin in Geriatr Med. 1993; 9:689703.Google Scholar
RTI International. Specifications for the Function Quality Measures Adopted in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. CMS.gov website. www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Post-Acute-Care_Quality-Initiatives/Downloads/IRF-QRP-Function-Quality-Measures-Specifications-August-2018.pdf. Accessed on 04/05/2020.Google Scholar
Chodiosh, J, Edelen, MO, Buchanan, JL, et al. Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: Development and testing of a brief instrument of mental status. J AM Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56:2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvin, JL. Interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary activities and the ACRM. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1980; 61:379380.Google Scholar
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Improving Medicare payment for post-acute care, March 2020 report. www.medpac.gov/-research-areas-/post-acute-care. Accessed on 04/12/2020.Google Scholar
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report on Skilled nursing facility services, March 2020 report. www.medpac.gov/-research-areas-/post-acute-care. Accessed on 04/12/2020.Google Scholar
Chan, L, Sandel, ME, Jette, AM, et al. Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013; 94:622629.Google Scholar
Hong, I, Goodwin, JS, Reistetter, TA, et al. Comparison of functional status improvements among patients with stroke receiving postacute care in inpatient rehabilitation vs skilled nursing facilities. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2756256. Accessed on 04/12/2020.Google Scholar
Munin, MC, Seligman, K, Dew, MA, et al. Effect of rehabilitation site on functional recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2005; 86:367372.Google Scholar
Mallison, T, Deutsch, A, Bateman, J, et al. Comparison of discharge functional status after rehabilitation in skilled nursing, home health, and medical rehabilitation settings for patients after hip fracture repair. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2014; 95:209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dejong, G, Horn, SD, Smout, RJ, et al. Joint replacement rehabilitation outcomes on discharge from skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2009; 90:12841296.Google Scholar
DeJong, G, Tian, W, Smout, RJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of joint replacement rehabilitation patients discharged from skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2009; 90:13061316.Google Scholar
Kumar, AM, Graham, JE, et al. Use of hospital-based rehabilitation services and hospital readmission following ischemic stroke in the United States. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100:12181225.Google Scholar
Kumar, R, Roe, MC, Scremin, OU. Methods for estimating the proper length of a cane. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1995; 76:11731175.Google Scholar
Faruqui, SR, Jaeblon, T. Ambulatory assistive devices in orthopaedics: Uses and modifications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18:4150.Google Scholar
Bradley, SM, Hernandez, CR. Geriatric assistive devices. Am Fam Phys. 2011; 84:405411.Google ScholarPubMed
Koontz, AM, Karmarkar, AM, Spaeth, DM, et al. Wheelchairs and seating systems. In: Braddom, RL, Chan, L, Harrast, MA, eds. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, pp. 373401.Google Scholar
Virani, SS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2020 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020; E139E596.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, HS, Nakayama, H, Raaschou, HO, et al. Neurological and functional recovery: The Copenhagen stroke study. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 1999; 10(4):887906.Google Scholar
Winstein, CJ, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016; 47(6):e98e169.Google Scholar
Kammersgaard, LP, Jørgensen, HS, Reith, J, et al. Short- and long-term prognosis for very old stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Age Ageing. 2004; 33(2):149.Google Scholar
Winstein, CJ, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016; 47(6):e98e169.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurology. 2015; 14(2): 224234.Google Scholar
Hesse, S, Bertelt, C, Jahnke, MT, et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995; 26(6):176981.Google Scholar
Eraifej, J, et al. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews. 2017; 6(1):40.Google Scholar
Nguyen, VQC, et al. The association of neurostimulant and antidepressant use with functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018; 61:e193e194.Google Scholar
Laver, KE, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; 11.Google Scholar
Grefkes, C, Fink, GR. Noninvasive brain stimulation after stroke: It is time for large randomized controlled trials! Current Opinion in Neurology. 2016; 29(6):714720.Google Scholar
McGuire, J, Harvey, RL. The prevention and management of complications after stroke. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 1999; 10:857874.Google Scholar
Good, D, Supan, T. Basic principles of orthotics in neurological disorders. In: Aisen, M, ed. Orthotics in Neurological Rehabilitation. New York: Demos Publications, 1992, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Chantraine, A, et al. Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: Effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Physical Med Rehab. 1999; 80:328331.Google Scholar
Viana, R, Pereira, S, Mehta, S, et al. Evidence for therapeutic interventions for hemiplegic shoulder pain during the chronic stage of stroke: A review. Top Stroke Rehab. 2012; 19:514522.Google Scholar
Martino, R, Foley, N, Bhogal, S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005; 36:27562763.Google Scholar
Foley, N, Teasell, R, Martino, R, et al. Dysphagia treatment post stroke: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Age Ageing. 2008; 37:258264.Google Scholar
Hackett, ML, Pickles, K. Part I: Frequency of depression after stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. International Journal of Stroke. 2014; 9(8):10171025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, RG, Jorge, RE. Post-stroke depression: A review. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2016; 173(3):221231.Google Scholar
Buntin, MB, Colla, CH, Escarce, JJ. Effects of payment changes on trends in post‐acute care. Health Services Research. 2009; 44(4):11881210.Google Scholar
DeRijk, MC, Breteler, MB, Graveland, GA, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 1995; 45:21432146.Google Scholar
Abbruzzese, G, Marchese, R, Avanzino, L, Pelosi, E. Rehabilitation for Parkinson’s disease: Current outlook and future challenges. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2016; 22(1):S60S64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moroz, A, Edgley, SR, Lew, HL, Chae, J. Rehabilitation interventions in Parkinson Disease. PM&R. 2009; 1:S4248.Google Scholar
Kegelmeyer, DA, Parthasarathy, S, Kostyk, SK, et al. Assistive devices alter gait patterns in Parkinson disease: Advantages of the four-wheeled walker. Gait Posture. 2013; 38:2024.Google Scholar
Song, R, Grabowska, W, Park, M, et al. The impact of Tai Chi and Qigong mind-body exercises on motor and non-motor function and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017; 41:313.Google Scholar
Ramig, LO, Sapir, S, Countryman, S, et al. Intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for patients with Parkinson’s disease: A 2-year follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 71:493498.Google Scholar
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Statistical Brief #6: Hospitalizations in the Elderly Population, 2003. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb6.jsp. Accessed on 06/28/2014.Google Scholar
Veronese, N, Maggi, S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018; 49(8):14581460.Google Scholar
Bhandari, M, Swiontkowski, M. Management of acute hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(21):20532062.Google Scholar
Liu, VX, Rosas, E, Hwang, J, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery program implementation in 2 surgical populations in an integrated health care delivery system. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(7):e171032.Google Scholar
Morri, M, Forni, C, Marchioni, M, et al. Which factors are independent predictors of early recovery of mobility in the older adults’ population after hip fracture? A cohort prognostic study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018; 138(1):3541.Google Scholar
Rolland, Y, Pillard, F, Lauwers-Cances, V, et al. Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture and cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26:425431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SY, Yoon, BH, Beom, J, et al. Effect of lower-limb progressive resistance exercise after hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017; 18(12):1096.e191096.e26.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Yang, W, Wang, X. Balance training can enhance hip fracture patients’ independence in activities of daily living: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(16):e19641.Google Scholar
Hao, L, Carson, JL, Schlussel, Y, et al. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with reduced mobility after hip fracture surgery: A prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020; 112(3):613618.Google Scholar
Rosen, N, Gigi, R, Haim, A, et al. Mortality and reoperations following lower limb amputations. IMAJ. 2014; 16:8387.Google Scholar
Sansam, K, Neumann, V, O’Connor, R, Bhakta, B. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: A systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41:593603.Google Scholar
Patnera, E, Pourtier-Piotte, C, Bensoussan, L, Coudeyre, E. Patient education after amputation: Systematic review and experts’ opinions. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 57:143212.Google Scholar
Waters, RL, Perry, D, Antonelli, D, Hislop, H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: The influence of level of amputation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1976; 1:4246.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×