Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:31:40.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Sector Theorists Should Be Inclusive of Muslim and Non-Western Perspectives

from Part II - Reflections and Refinements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2024

Eva Witesman
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Curtis Child
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

This chapter critiques Western and scientific philanthropy scholarly understanding of the nonprofit sector. It argues that this narrow analysis of nonprofits limits our understanding of Muslim prosocial behaviors that are less dominant in the academic literature. By examining the tenets and roots of Muslim prosocial action, we see how this specific view of social good has been limited in the broader conversation, which in turn has limited our understanding of the nonprofit sector across the world. The chapter also explores Muslim prosocial action by examining its theological and cultural sources to create a broader conception of giving behavior within an Islamic context, and discusses the challenges associated with strict adherence to the Western definition of the nonprofit sector for scholars who want to include Muslim perspectives and charitable acts. Ultimately, it suggests a framework that nonprofit-sector scholars can use to move beyond Western-centric definitions of prosocial action to include other cultural and faith perspectives. This approach treats Muslim prosocial action as a practice-oriented religious tradition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reimagining Nonprofits
Sector Theory in the Twenty-First Century
, pp. 174 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, D. W. (2018). Zakat as practical theodicy: Precarity and the critique of gender in Muslim India. Journal on Muslim Philanthropy and Civil Society, 2(1), 2141.Google Scholar
Adam, T. (2020). From waqf to foundation: The case for a global and integrated history of philanthropy. Journal of Muslim Philanthropy and Civil Society, 4(1), 5573.Google Scholar
Ba-Yunus, I., & Kone, K. (2006) Muslims in the United States. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Billis, D. (2010). Hybrid organisations in the overlapping territory with the personal world. In Billis, D. & Rochester, C. (Eds.), Handbook on hybrid organisations. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Bremner, R. H. (1988). American philanthropy (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bremner, R. H. (2000). Giving: Charity and philanthropy in history. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Cizakca, M. (2000). A history of philanthropic foundations: The Islamic world from the seventh century to the present. Bogazici University Press.Google Scholar
Fauzia, A. (2013). Faith, and the state: A history of Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S. A. (2007). Till God inherits the earth: Islamic pious endowments in al-Andalus (9–15th centuries). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. D. (1999). The work of many hands: A response to Stanley N. Katz on the origins of the “serious study” of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 522534.Google Scholar
Hall, P. D. (2006). A historical overview of philanthropy, voluntary associations, and nonprofit organizations in the United States, 1600–2000. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 32–65). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ilchman, W. F., Katz, S., & Queen II, E. L. (1998). Philanthropy in the world’s traditions. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Isin, E. F., & Lefebvre, A. (2005), The gift of law: Greek euergetism and Ottoman waqf. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(1), 523.Google Scholar
Ismail, A. G., Zaenal, M. H., & Shafiai, H. (2013) Philanthropy in Islam: A promise to welfare economics system. IRTI Working Paper Series, Islamic Research and Training Institute, WP# 1435-03.Google Scholar
Khan, S. (2020). Leadership, professionalisation and impact: Lessons from a national survey of non-profit leaders in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Voluntary Sector Review, 11(1), 7997.Google Scholar
Khan, S., & Siddiqui, S. (2017). Islamic education in the United States and the evolution of Muslim nonprofit institutions. Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T. (2003). Islamic redistribution through zakat: Historical record and modern realities. In Bonner, M., Ener, M., & Singer, A. (Eds.), Poverty and charity in Middle Eastern contexts. State University of New York.Google Scholar
Lev, Y. (2005). Charity, endowments, and charitable institutions in medieval Islam. University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Mattson, I. (2010). Zakat in America: The evolving role in Islamic charity in community cohesion. Lake Institute on Faith and Giving, Indiana University.Google Scholar
McChesney, R. D. (1995). Charity and philanthropy in Islam: Institutionalizing the call to do good, essay on philanthropy no 14. Indiana University Center on Philanthropy.Google Scholar
McChesney, R. D. (2004). Islamic philanthropy. In Burlingame, D. (Ed.), Philanthropy in America: A comprehensive historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
McCully, G. (2008). Philanthropy reconsidered: Private initiatives–public good – Quality of life. Author House, Indiana.Google Scholar
McCully, G. (2012). What is-and is not-philanthropy (Conversations on Philanthropy), retrieved from www.academia.edu/36978441/What_Is_and_Is_Not_Philanthropy_docxGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, M. (2020). Euregetism. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar
Pallas, C., & Sidel, M. (2020). Foreign aid reduction and local civil society: Recent research and policy guidance for donors and international NGOs. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 11(1), 20190045.Google Scholar
Payton, R. L. (1998). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. American Council on Education/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Payton, R. L., & Moody, M. (2008). Understanding philanthropy: Its meaning and mission. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. D., & Jung, T. (2015), Introduction: A new “new” philanthropy: From impetus to impact. In Jung, T., Phillips, S. D., & Harrow, J. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philanthropy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rashid, M., Hassan, M. K., Min, H. S., & Wali Ullah, G. M. (2017). Reporting of zakat and charitable activities in Islamic banks: Theory and practice in a multi-cultural setting. In Hassan, M. K. (Ed.), Handbook of empirical research on Islam and economic life. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1992). America’s nonprofit sector: A primer. Foundation Center.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, S. (2010). Giving in the name of God. In Smith, D. H. (Ed.), Religious giving: For love of God. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, S. (2022). Muslim philanthropy: Living beyond a Western definition. Voluntary Sector Review, 13(3), 338354.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, S., Wasif, R., Hughes, M., Paarlberg, A., & Noor, Z. (2022). Muslim American Zakat Report 2022. Muslim Philanthropy Initiative at Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.Google Scholar
Singer, A. (2008). Charity in Islamic societies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, A. (2018). The politics of philanthropy. Journal of Muslim Philanthropy and Civil Society, 2(1), 4.Google Scholar
Sulek, M. (2005). Recovering the original meaning in philanthropy. In Shaker, G. (Ed.), Faculty work and the public good. Teachers College Press – Columbia University.Google Scholar
Sulek, M. (2010). On the modern meaning of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 193212.Google Scholar
Van Til, J. (1990) Critical issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice. AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1990). Bread and circuses: Historical sociology and political pluralism (B. Pearce, Trans.). Penguin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×