Book contents
- Reimagining Shakespeare Education
- Reimagining Shakespeare Education
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Reimagining Shakespeare with/in Schools
- Part II Reimagining Shakespeare with/in Universities
- Part III Public Reimaginings
- Part IV Digital Reimaginings
- Part V Reimagining Performance
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Part I - Reimagining Shakespeare with/in Schools
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2023
Book contents
- Reimagining Shakespeare Education
- Reimagining Shakespeare Education
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Reimagining Shakespeare with/in Schools
- Part II Reimagining Shakespeare with/in Universities
- Part III Public Reimaginings
- Part IV Digital Reimaginings
- Part V Reimagining Performance
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reimagining Shakespeare EducationTeaching and Learning through Collaboration, pp. 21 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Cox, Carole, 2008. Teaching Language Arts: A Student-Centered Classroom (6th edn. New York: Pearson).Google Scholar
Watson, Ken, 2003. ‘Shakespeare in New South Wales Secondary Schools: A Brief History’, English in Australia 136: 12–18.Google Scholar
References
Blood, Imogen, Lomas, Mark, and Robinson, Mark, 2016. Every Child: Equality and Diversity in Arts and Culture with, by and for Young People (Manchester: Arts Council England). www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/FINAL%20report%20web%20ready.pdf.Google Scholar
Bloom, Adi, 2016. ‘Exclusive Video: Sir Ian McKellen on Why Shakespeare Does Not Belong in Schools’. www.tes.com/news/exclusive-video-sir-ian-mckellen-why-shakespeare-does-not-belong-schools.Google Scholar
Cox, Brian, 1989. The Cox Report: English for Ages 5–16 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2008. The National Strategies – Shakespeare for All Ages and Stages (Nottingham: DCSF Publications).Google Scholar
Irish, Tracy. 2011. ‘Would You Risk It for Shakespeare? A Case Study of Using Active Approaches in the English Classroom’, English in Education 45.1, 6–19.Google Scholar
Shakespeare Schools Foundation, 2018. Impact Report (London: Shakespeare Schools Foundation). https://issuu.com/shakespeareschools/docs/issuu.Google Scholar
Sokolov, Stanislav, Saakiants, Robert, and Karayev, Alexei (dirs.), 2004. The Animated Tales (Video recording), vol. 1 (New York: Ambrose Video).Google Scholar
Stredder, James, 2009. The North Face of Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Tandy, Lewis, 2020. ‘Attainment 8 and Progress 8 Explained’, The Locrating Blog. www.locrating.com/Blog/attainment-8-and-progress-8-explained.aspx.Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2019. The English Indices of Deprivation Statistical Release, 26 September. London: HMSO. www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard, 1997. ‘NATO’s Pharmacy: Shakespeare by Prescription’, in Joughin, John J. (ed.), Shakespeare and National Culture (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 58–81.Google Scholar
References
Bourassa, Michelle, Bélair, Louise, and Chevalier, Jacques, 2007. ‘Liminaire. Les Outils de la recherche participative’, in Bourassa, Michelle, Bélair, Louise, and Chevalier, Jacques (eds.), Éducation et francophonie, XXXV: 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Passeron, Jean-Claude, 1977. Reproduction: In Education, Society and Culture (London: Sage).Google Scholar
Jacquot, Jean, 1964. Shakespeare en France. Mises en scène d’hier et d’aujourd’hui (Paris: Le Temps).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Dennis, 2009. The Spectator and the Spectacle. Audiences in Modernity and Postmodernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mullaney, Steven, 1988. The Place of the Stage: License, Play and Power in Renaissance England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre, 1996. ‘Amalgamating System Analysis, Participative Research and Action Research and Some Problems Concerning These Terms’, in Sébillote, Michel (ed.), Systems-Oriented Research in Agriculture and Rural Development (Montpellier: CIRAD-SAR), 117–27.Google Scholar
Sarrazac, Jean-Pierre, 1996. ‘Le spectateur, c’est celui qui comprend’, Du théâtre, 5, 17–23.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, 2008. Twelfth Night or What You Will, ed. Elam, Keir (London: Arden Shakespeare).Google Scholar
References
Cox, Carole, 2008. Teaching Language Arts: A Student-Centered Classroom (6th edn. New York: Pearson).Google Scholar
Erskine, Joanna, 2013. Speech, Bell Shakespeare Primary Program Launch, The Rocks, Sydney.Google Scholar
Ewing, Robyn, 2019. Drama-rich Pedagogy and Becoming Deeply Literate (Brisbane: Drama Australia).Google Scholar
Ewing, Robyn and Saunders, John Nicholas, 2016. School Drama: Drama, Literature and Literacy in the Creative Classroom (Sydney: Currency Press).Google Scholar
Farrell, Paul, 2016. ‘Germaine Greer Tells Q&A Shakespeare’s Timeless Lesson Is To Make Us Think’, The Guardian, 6 September. www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/sep/06/germaine-greer-tells-qa-shakespeares-timeless-lesson-is-to-make-us-think#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWhat%20actually%20happens%20in%20a,%E2%80%93%20because%20everything%20keeps%20shifting.%E2%80%9DGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Robyn and Ewing, Robyn, 2020. Transforming the Curriculum through the Arts (2nd edn. Cham, Switzerland: Springer).Google Scholar
Jongjin, 2017. ‘Why Shakespeare Shouldn’t be Taught in Schools’. https://medium.com/@jongjinpark/why-shakespeare-shouldnt-be-taught-in-schools-5046411335c0Google Scholar
Lindsay, Geoff, Winston, Joe, Franks, Matthew, and Lees, David, 2016. The Work of Royal Shakespeare Company Education in the first year of the Associate Schools Programme (Warwick, UK: University of Warwick, Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research).Google Scholar
Parker, Kathryn, 2016. ‘Shakespearean Drama: A Vehicle for Explorative Learning and Higher-order Thinking’. www.educationmattersmag.com.au/shakespearean-drama-explorative-learning/Google Scholar
Ramnanan, Angela, 2013. ‘Introducing Shakespeare Early. Why, When, Where and How to Teach Shakespeare to Elementary and Middle School Students’. Unpublished Master’s thesis (Washington DC: University of Georgetown).Google Scholar
Seymour, Rae, 2016. ‘Why not to Fear Teaching Shakespeare for Young Learners’ (London: British Council). www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/why-not-fear-teaching-shakespeare-young-learnersGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William, 2015. Macbeth, edited by Sandra Clark and Pamela Mason (London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare).Google Scholar
Strauss, Valerie, 2015. ‘Teacher: Why I Don’t Want to Assign Shakespeare Anymore (even though he’s in the Common Core)’. The Washington Post, 13 June 2015. www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/06/13/teacher-why-i-dont-want-to-assign-shakespeare-anymore-even-though-hes-in-the-common-core/Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff, 1987. ‘Spaces to Play: The Use of Analyses of Narrative Structure in Classroom Work with Children’s Literature’, in Saxby, M. and Winch, G. (eds.), Give Them Wings: The Experience of Children’s Literature (Melbourne: Macmillan).Google Scholar
References
Ball, Stephen J., 2003. ‘The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity’, Journal of Education Policy 18.2, 215–28.Google Scholar
Biesta, Gert J.J., 2017. ‘Education, Measurement and the Professions: Reclaiming a Space for Democratic Professionality in Education’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 49.4, 315–30.Google Scholar
Flaherty, Kate, 2009. ‘Richard III, Kings’ Games: Murder, Muddy, Marry or Make Friends’, mETAphor 1, 43–6.Google Scholar
Flaherty, Kate, Gay, Penny, and Semler, Liam E. (eds.), 2013. Teaching Shakespeare Beyond the Centre: Australasian Perspectives (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Hardy, Ian, 2020. School Reform in an Era of Standardisation: Authentic Accountabilities (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Lingard, Bob, 2010. ‘Policy Borrowing, Policy Learning: Testing Times in Australian Schools’, Critical Studies in Education 51.2, 129–47.Google Scholar
Lingard, Bob, Thompson, Greg, and Sellar, Sam (eds.), 2016. National Testing in Schools: An Australian Assessment (Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Manuel, Jacqueline, Carter, Don, and Dutton, Janet, 2018. ‘“As much as I love being in the classroom …”: Understanding Secondary English Teachers’ Workload’, English in Australia 53.3, 5–22.Google Scholar
Manuel, Jacqueline, Hansen, Claire, and Semler, Liam E., 2022. ‘An Activist Democratic Model of Teacher Professional Learning: The Teaching and Learning Caskets Imaginarium’, in Goodwyn, Andrew, Manuel, Jacqueline, Roberts, Rachel, Scherff, Lisa, Sawyer, Wayne, Durrant, Cal and Zancanella, Don (eds.), International Perspectives on English Teacher Development: From Initial Teacher Education to Highly Accomplished Professional (London: Routledge) 200–214.Google Scholar
McGrath-Champ, Susan, Wilson, Rachel, Stacey, Megan, and Fitzgerald, Scott, 2018. Understanding Work in Schools. Report to the NSW Teachers Federation (Sydney and Perth: University of Sydney and Curtin University). Retrieved 31 October 2018. https://news.nswtf.org.au/application/files/7315/3110/0204/Understanding-Work-In-Schools.pdf.Google Scholar
Morrison, Keith, 2002. School Leadership and Complexity Theory (London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer).Google Scholar
Morrison, Keith, 2008. ‘Educational Philosophy and the Challenge of Complexity Theory’, in Mason, Mark (ed.), Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education (Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell), 16–31.Google Scholar
Sachs, Judyth, 2016. ‘Teacher Professionalism: Why are we still Talking about it?’, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 22.4, 413–25.Google Scholar
Semler, Liam E., 2013. Teaching Shakespeare and Marlowe: Learning versus The System (London and New York).Google Scholar
Semler, Liam E., 2019. ‘Shakespeeding into Macbeth and The Tempest: Teaching with the Shakespeare Reloaded Website’, in Homan, Sidney (ed.), How and Why We Teach Shakespeare: College Teachers and Directors Share How They Explore the Playwright’s Works with Their Students (New York: Routledge), 119–27.Google Scholar
Semler, Liam E., 2022. ‘Shakespeare Reloaded’s Shakeserendipity Game: Pedagogy at the Edge of Chaos’, in Henderson, Diana E. and Sebastian Vitale, Kyle (eds.), Shakespeare and Digital Pedagogy: Case Studies and Strategies (New York and London: Bloomsbury), 198–210.Google Scholar
Semler, Liam E., Hansen, Claire, and Abbott Bennett, Kristen, 2021. ‘Shakespeare Redrawn: Reflections on Shakespeare Reloaded’s COVID-19 Lockdown Activity’, mETAphor 2, 15–21.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, 2006. As You Like It, edited by Dusinberre, Juliet (London and New York: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Solomon, Lucy, 2018. ‘Reflection Statement’, in Better Strangers Annual Report (Sydney: unpublished), 16–17.Google Scholar
Stroud, Gabbie, 2018. Teacher: One Woman’s Struggle to Keep the Heart in Teaching (Sydney: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Tosey, Paul, 2006. ‘Interfering with the Interference: An Emergent Perspective on Creativity in Higher Education’, in Jackson, Norman, Oliver, Martin, Shaw, Malcolm, and Wisdom, James (eds.), Developing Creativity in Higher Education: An Imaginative Curriculum (London and New York: Routledge), 29–42.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven C., 2012. Neoliberalism and the Global Restructuring of Knowledge and Education (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar