Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:36:52.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - An Introduction

Towards the Multifold Vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

By
Sandy Lamalle  and
Peter Stoett
Edited by
Sandy Lamalle  and
Peter Stoett
Sandy Lamalle
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Peter Stoett
Affiliation:
Ontario Tech University
Get access

Summary

This chapter introduces the reflection in the book and the work of the ESG Workgroup on the Representations and Rights of the Environment (ESGRREW), with its intercultural and interdisciplinary process of Research & Dialogue: a critical appraisal of how humankind conceive its relationship with the environment, towards a clear vision of how to apprehend it in law and governance. The reflection takes heed of the change in vision in different fields of knowledge and the message of Indigenous peoples with other critical voices regarding humankind’s present predicament. It champions social and environmental justice, and highlights the crisis of representations and perception of our world. Rekindling the conscience of diversity of languages, cultures and modes of knowing and being, it advocates a wide and relational approach, considering lived experience. It contends that we need to remove ‘barriers to understanding’, create and nurture a common space towards a ‘new common sense’. Reconnecting with other legal traditions will contribute to rethinking legal frameworks and practices for a new legal consciousness.

Keywords

‘Cry of the Earth’change in visionsciencelaw and societyrelational ontologyIndigenous peoplesreconciliationecological crisiscrisis of representationsnew legal consciousnessparadigm shift
Type
Chapter
Information
Representations and Rights of the Environment , pp. 1 - 40
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alliot, M. (1983). Anthropologie et juristique: Sur les conditions de l’élaboration d’une science du droit. Bulletin de liaison du Laboratoire d’anthropologie juridique de Paris 6: 83–117.Google Scholar
Andler, D., Fagot-Largeault, A. and Saint-Sernin, B. (2002). Philosophie des sciences. Paris: Gallimard Folio.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (1996). Modernity at Large: The Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Austin-Broos, D. and Merlan, F. (eds.) (2017). People and Change in Indigenous Australia. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bankowski, Z. and Scott, A. (2000). The European Union and Its Order: The Legal Theory of European Integration. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bartels, K. P. R. and Wittmayer, J. M. (2014). Symposium introduction: Usable knowledge in practice. What action research has to offer to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 8(4): 397–406.Google Scholar
Battiste, M. (2000). Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Battiste, M. (2002). ‘Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First nations education: A literature review with recommendations’, for the national Working Group on education and the Minister of Indian Affairs, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC). Ottawa.Google Scholar
Baudrez, M. and di Manno, T. (eds.) (2005). Liber Amicorum Jean-Claude Escarras, La communicabilité entre les systèmes juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Bellier, I. and Legros, D (eds.) (2001). Mondialisation et stratégies politiques autochtone. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec 31(3): 3–12.Google Scholar
Benyekhlef, K., Amar, E. and Callipel, V. (2015). ICT-driven strategies for reforming access to justice mechanisms in developing countries. World Bank Legal Review 6: 325–43.Google Scholar
Bergthaller, H., Emmet, R., Johns-Putra, A. et al. (2014). Mapping common ground: Ecocriticism, environmental history and the environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities 5(1): 261–76.Google Scholar
Berry, T. (1988). The Dream of the Earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books [repr. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint, 2015].Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2007). Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17(3–4): 326–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F. (2012). Planetary boundaries and earth system governance: Exploring the links. Ecological Economics 81: 4–9.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2014). Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boff, L. (1997). Cry of the Earth, Cry of the Poor. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Gowlland-Debbas, V. (2001). The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality. Liber amicorum Georges Abi-Saab. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bold, R. (ed.) (2019). Indigenous Perceptions of the End of the World: Creating a Cosmopolitics of Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosselmann, K. (2011). A vulnerable environment: Contextualising law with sustainability. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 2(1): 45–63.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, J. and Rosat, J.-J. (eds.) (2003). Philosophie de la perception: Phénoménologie, grammaire et sciences cognitives. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. R. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, 40th session of the Human Rights Council. A/HRC/40/55.Google Scholar
Broekman, J. M. and Cata Backer, L. (2013). Lawyers Making Meaning. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. (ed.) (1988). The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350–c. 1450. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cadava, E., Connor, P. and Nancy, J.-L. (eds.) (1991). Who Comes after the Subject? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (1967). Mort de l’homme ou épuisement du Cogito. Critique 24(242): 599–618.Google Scholar
Canoe, L. and Porter, Tom (2001). Sounding a basic call to consciousness. In McFadden, S. (ed.), Profiles in Wisdom: Native Elders Speak about the Earth. New York: Authors Choice Press, 19–34.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (2010). The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism. Boulder, CO: Shambala Publication.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. (1962). Silent Spring [40th anniv. ed. 2002]. New York: Mariner.Google Scholar
Carmagnat, F. (1994). L’invention des sciences modernes (Isabelle Stengers). Réseaux 12(65): 129–31.Google Scholar
Carmichael, L. (2010). Reconciliation: some stumbling blocks, assumptions, dilemmas’. Consultation Report for Effective & Sustainable Reconciliation Conference St George’s house, Windsor, 21 May 2010.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (ed.) (1990). Post-Modern Law, Enlightenment, Revolution and the Death of Man. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (1991). Critical international law: Recent trends in the theory of international law. European Journal of International Law 2(1): 66–97.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (2007). Philosophy of International Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Castillo, M. M. and Strecker, A. (eds.) (2017). Heritage and Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Castree, N., Hulme, M. and Proctor, J. D. (eds.) (2018). Companion to Environmental Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chual, L. J. and Engel, David M. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15: 335–53.Google Scholar
Clarkson, L., Morrissette, Vern and Régallet, Gabriel (1992). Our Responsibility to the Seventh Generation, Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Development. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (2003). On the Edges of Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Cobley, P. (2017). What the humanities are for: A semiotic perspective. In Bankov, Kristian and Cobley, Paul (eds.), Semiotics and Its Masters. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, vol. 1, 3–24.Google Scholar
Code, L. (2006). Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
COMEST (2015). Report on Ethical Perspective on Science, Technology and Society: A Contribution to the Post-2015 Agenda. Paris: World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. E. and Palmer, J. A. (eds.) (1998). Spirit of the Environment: Religion, Value and Environmental Concern. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cyrulnik, B. and Morin, E. (2018). Dialogue sur notre nature humaine: L’unité dans la diversité. Marabout: Éditions de l’Aube.Google Scholar
Daniel, C.-É., Legault, G. A and Bernier, L (2015). La régulation des nanotechnologies, le débat national français et le dialogue social: Nanomonde, grandes attentes normatives? Lex Electronica 20(1): 93–125.Google Scholar
Delio, I. (2003). A Franciscan View of Creation: Learning to Live in a Sacramental World, Synthesis provided by: Marie Puleo, A Franciscan View of Creation: Learning to Live in a Sacramental World. The Franciscan Heritage Series, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2008). Les forces imaginantes du droit. Cours au Collège de France, 6.Google Scholar
Dews, P. (2007). Logics of Disintegration, Poststructuralist Thought, and the Claims of Critical Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E, Ngo, H. T., Guèze, M, Agard, J. et al. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, http://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/spm_unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdfGoogle Scholar
Donati, P. (2004). La relation comme objet spécifique de la sociologie. Revue du MAUSS 2(24).Google Scholar
Dorough, D. S. (2009). The significance of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its future implementation. In Charters, C. and Stavenhagen, R. (eds.), Making the Declaration Work: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Copenhagen: IWGIA, 264–78.Google Scholar
Dowie, M. (2017). The Haida Gwaii Lesson: A Strategic Playbook for Indigenous Sovereignty. San Francisco: Inkshares.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ducarme, F. and Couvet, D. (2020). What does ‘nature’ mean? Palgrave Communications 6: 14.Google Scholar
Eberhard, C. (ed.) (2008). Traduire nos responsabilités planétaires: Recomposer nos paysages juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Eberhard, C. and Vernicos, G. (eds.) (2006). La quête anthropologique du droit. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. and Infeld, L. (1993). L’évolution des idées en physiques, des premiers concepts au théories de la relativité et des quantas. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Ermine, W. (2007). Ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal 6(1): 193.Google Scholar
Espagnat, B. (1994). Le réel voilé: analyse des concepts quantiques. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Fagot-Largeault, A. (2006). Cours sur l’ontologie du devenir, Collège de France, Chaire de philosophie des sciences, Série de cours années 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09. Available on the website of the Collège de France.Google Scholar
Favareau, D., Kull, K. et al. (2017). How can the study of the humanities inform the study of biosemiotics? Biosemiotics 10: 9–31.Google Scholar
Fleerackers, F. and Broekman, J. (2020). Legal Thoughts Convert: Rethinking Legal Thinking. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Fox, O. and Stoett, P. (2016). Citizen participation in the UN Sustainable Development Goals consultation process: Toward global democratic governance. Global Governance 22: 555–74.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Matthew, Hunter (eds.) (2010). Beyond mimesis and convention: Representation in art and science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 262: 26.Google Scholar
Future Earth Report (2020). Our Future on Earth, Science Insights into Our Planet and Society.Google Scholar
Gal-Or, N., Ryngaert, C. and Noortmann, M. (eds.) (2015). Responsibilities of the Non-State Actor in Armed Conflict and the Market Place. Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, J. (2005). Corpus iuris civilis: Dictionnaire de la culture juridique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1394–98.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Gélinas, C. and Bouchard, Y. (2013). An epistemological framework for indigenous knowledge. Université de Sherbrooke, 45th Algonquian Conference, 18 October.Google Scholar
Gémar, J. C. (1995). Traduire ou l’art d’interpréter. Langue, droit et société. Eléments de jurilinguistique. Tome 2: Application. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Gessner, V. (1994). Global legal interaction and legal cultures. Ratio Juris 7(2): 132–45.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origins of Species. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gira, D. (2001). Au-delà de la tolerance: La rencontre des religions. Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
Glenn, P. (2004). Legal Traditions of the World. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Godden, L. (2018). Climate change: Limits discourses at the interface of international law and environmental law. In Jessup, B. and Rubenstein, K. (eds.), Environmental Discourses in Public and Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press, 263–85.Google Scholar
Goodrich, P. (1986). Reading the Law: A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gotti, M. and Williams, C. (eds.) (2010). Legal Discourse across Languages and Cultures. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gounelle, M. (2005). Communicabilité en droit international public. In Baudrez, M. and di Manno, T. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Jean-Claude Escarras. La communicabilité entre les systèmes juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant, 107.Google Scholar
Grant, E., Kotzé, L. J. and Morrow, K. (2013). Human rights and the environment: In search of a new relationship. Synergies and common themes. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(5): 953–65.Google Scholar
Grear, A. (2013). Towards a new horizon: In search of a renewing socio-juridical imaginary. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(5): 966–90.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1997). Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage/Open University.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1998). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Z. (2002). The cosmos, a symbol of the divine. In Nothwehr, D. M. (ed.), Franciscan Theology of the Environment: An Introductory Reader. Quincy, IL: Rochester OSF Franciscan Press, 249–67.Google Scholar
Heppner, D. H. (2020). The stranger and the ancient race: Collective responsibility in educational research. Journal of Indigenous Research 8: art. 10.Google Scholar
Holder, J. and McGillivray, D (2017). Bringing environmental justice to the centre of environmental law research: Developing a collective case study methodology. In Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. and Brooks, V. (eds.), Research Methods in Environmental Law: A Handbook. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Holm, P., Adamson, J., Huang, H., Kirdan, L., Kitch, S., McCaldman, I. et al. (2015). Humanities for the environment: A manifesto for research and action. Humanities 4(4): 977–92.Google Scholar
Howard, R., Ciudad, L. A. and de Pedro Ricoy, R. (2018). Translating rights: The Peruvian Languages Act in Quechua and Aymara. Amerindia 40: 219–45.Google Scholar
ILA (2012). Report of the Committee on the Implementation of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Sofia Conference, International Law Association, August 2012.Google Scholar
ILA (2016). Final Report of the Committee on Non-State Actors, Johannesburg Conference, International Law Association, August 2016.Google Scholar
ILA (2020). Resolution and Final Report of the Committee on the Implementation of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted at the ILA Conference in Kyoto, International Law Association, December 2020.Google Scholar
ILC (2006). Report on the Fragmentation of International Law. International Law Commission, UN Doc. A/CN.4/l.682.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011). Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (2017). Indigenous People and Climate Change, Gender, Equality and Diversity Branch. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
IPBES (2019). Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.Google Scholar
IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 °C, an IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
IPCC (2019). Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. S. (1988). Law, Fact, and Narrative Coherence. Merseyside, UK: Deborah Charles.Google Scholar
Johnston, J., Gregory, D. and Smith, D. M. (eds.) (1996). Dictionary of Human Geography. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kalka, R. (1985). La structure de la métaphysique de la relation chez Thomas d’Aquin. Journal philosophique du Centre de recherche philosophique Saint Thomas d’Aquin (5): 218–39.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. (1989). Les deux corps du Roi, essai sur la théologie politique au Moyen Âge. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2004). The disenchantment of the logically formal legal rationality. Hastings Law Journal 55(5): 1031–76.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2006). The last treatise: Project and person. German Law Journal 7(12): 982–92.Google Scholar
Kimmerer, R. W. (2020 [Milkweed Editions 2013]). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Korten, D. C. (2015). Change the Story, Change the Future: A Living Economy for a Living Earth. Report to the Club of Rome, Living Economies Forum. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). International law in Europe: Between tradition and renewal. European Journal of International Law 16(1): 113–24.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2006). Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, International Law Commission, A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar
Kotze, L. (2018). Reflections on the future of environmental scholarship and methodology in the Anthropocene. In Pedersen, O. (ed.), Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–61.Google Scholar
Kotze, L. J. and Kim, R. E. (2019). Earth System Law: The Juridical Dimensions of Earth System Governance. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2014). Multilevel translation analysis of a key legal concept: persona juris and legal pluralism. In Le Cheng, K. K. Sin, and Wagner, A. (eds.), Ashgate Handbook on Legal Translation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 299–312.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2015). Reconciliation in Canada: A healing force for social and institutional change. Indigenous Law Bulletin 8(16): 20–23.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2020a). De l’entendement juridique et des perspectives jurilinguistiques, actes du colloque le droit au prisme des langues. Revue de droit international et de droit comparé 1.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2020b). L’horizon de la sémiotique juridique. In Emerich, Y, Hulin, A. S. and Lamalle, S (eds.), Coder–Décoder: Linguistique et concepts juridiques. Montreal: Éditions Yvon Blais.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Le Roy, E. (2004). Pour une anthropologie de la juridicité. Cahiers d’Anthropologie du Droit 241–47.Google Scholar
Legrand, P. (1996). Comparer. Revue internationale de droit comparé 48(2): 279–318.Google Scholar
Lévesque, C., Cloutier, É. and Salée, D. (eds.) (2011). Co-construction des connaissances en contexte autochtone, Actes de colloque, Réseau de recherche et de connaissances relatives aux peuples autochtones (DIALOG) et Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS). Cahier DIALOG 2013–03.Google Scholar
Lipari, L. (2014). Listening, Thinking, Being: Toward an Ethics of Attunement. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Lucchesi, A. H. (2019). Spirit-based research: A tactic for surviving trauma in decolonizing research. Journal of Indigenous Research 7(1): art. 4.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, K. (2017). Reconciliation, Indigenous knowledge and earth law: Getting rid of the stereotypes. Paper presented at launch of the ESGRREW Process of Dialogue & Research, 13 April, Concordia University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Martineau, J. (ed.) (2010). Quadrivium: Number, Geometry, Music, Heaven. Glastonbury, UK: Wooden Books.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. (2006). Comparative Legal Linguistics, Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas. Goddard, Christopher (trans.). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. E. S. (2012). Jurilinguistique comparée: Langages du droit, latin et langues modernes. Gémar, Jean-Claude (trans.). Montreal: Yvon Blais.Google Scholar
Mausen, Y. (2003). Scolastique juridique. In Alland, D. and Rials, S. (eds.), Dictionnaire de la culture juridique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1394–98.Google Scholar
Mazzocchi, F. (2006). Western science and traditional knowledge. EMBO Reports 7(5): 463.Google Scholar
McFadden, S. (ed.) (2001). Profiles in Wisdom: Native Elders Speak about the Earth. New York: Athours Choice Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, S. (2005). Rainbow Warriors. New York: Harlem Writers Guild Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (2018). From ‘decolonized’ to reconciliation research in Canada: Drawing from Indigenous research paradigms. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 17(3): 810–31.Google Scholar
McNamee, S. and Gergen, K. J. (eds.) (1999). Relational Responsibility Resources for Sustainable Dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (2017). The birth of the environment and the evolution of environmental governance. In Meadowcroft, J. and Fiorino, D. J. (eds.), Conceptual Innovation in Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53–73.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., Gupta, and Stevenson, (2014). Work Plan, Taskforce on Conceptual Foundations, Earth System Governance Project, 15 December, www.earthsystemgovernance.net/conceptual-foundationsGoogle Scholar
Menski, W. (2005). Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Menski, W. (2006). Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). Le primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques. Lagrasse: Éditions Verdier.Google Scholar
Meslin, M. (1988). L’expérience humaine du divin, Coll. cogitatio fidei, 150. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (1999). Pour une histoire de l’ontologie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Millennium Declaration (2000). UNGA, 55th session (8 September 2005), A/RES/55/2.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2004). Proceedings of the International Conference. Bridging Scales and Epistemologies: Linking Local Knowledge and Global Science in Multi-Scale Assessments. Alexandria, Egypt, www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Bridging.Proceedings.htmlGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. (1996). Intuitions de Génie: Images et créativité dans les sciences et les arts. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1998). Nature and the environment on Indigenous and traditional cultures. In Cooper, D. E. and Palmer, J. A. (eds.), Spirit of the Environment. London: Routledge, 81–94.Google Scholar
Moltmann, J. (1980). Reconciliation with Nature. Methodist Conference in London, distributed by North American Conference on Religion and Ecology (NACRE). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Moltmann, J. (1990). Human Rights and Rights of Nature (NACRE). International Conference on Caring for Creation, Washington, DC, 15–17 May.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. (2011). Transforming Law and Institutions, Indigenous Peoples: The United Nations and Human Rights. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (2011). Ontological vulnerability: A viable alternative lens through which to view human/environmental relations. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 2(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Napoleon, V. and Friedland, H. (2016). The inside job: Engaging with Indigenous legal traditions through stories. McGill Law Journal/Revue de droit de McGill 61(4): 725–54.Google Scholar
Nash, C. (ed.). (1994). Narrative in Culture: The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neimanis, A., Åsberg, C. and Hedrén, J. (2015). Four problems, four directions for environmental humanities: Toward critical posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Ethics and the Environment 20(1): 67–97.Google Scholar
Ness, B. and Zondervan, R.. (2017). The Taskforce on Conceptual Foundations of Earth System Governance: Sustainability science. Challenges in Sustainability 5(1): 1.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice Theory, Work and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nijman, J. E. (2004). The Concept of International Personality: An Inquiry into the History and Theory of International Law. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.Google Scholar
Nikolić, M. (2017). All that is air melts into city: Minoritarian apparatuses for a more-than-human. In Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. and Brooks, V. (eds.), Research Methods in Environmental Law: A Handbook. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Nye, D. et al. (2013). Background document on emergence of the environmental humanities. MISTRA, www.mistra.org/en/mistra/application-calls/completed-application-calls/environmental-humanities.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pahuja, S. (2011), Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. ([1878] 1958). How to make our ideas clear [1878]. In Values in a Universe of Chance: Selected Writings, 1839–1914. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Petrilli, S. (2014). Sign Studies and Semioethics: Communication, Translation and Values. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. and Brooks, V. (eds.) (2017). Research Methods in Environmental Law: A Handbook. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Primavesi, A. (1998). The recovery of wisdom. In Cooper, D. E. and Palmer, J. A. (eds.), Spirit of the Environment: Religion, Value and Environmental Concern. London: Routledge, 69–80.Google Scholar
Pulitano, E. (ed.) (2012). Indigenous Rights in the Age of the UN Declaration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramlogan, R. (2002). The environmental and international law rethinking the traditional approach. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 3.Google Scholar
Ratto, M. (2016). Making at the end of nature. Interactions 23(5): 26–35, interactions.acm.orgGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K. (2000). Sovereignty and multilateralism. Chicago Journal of International Law 1(2): 401–419.Google Scholar
Rawles, K. (1998). Philosophy and the environmental movement. In Cooper, D. E. and Palmer, J. A. (eds.), Spirit of the Environment. London: Routledge, 125–38.Google Scholar
Regenstein, L. G. (1991). Replenish the Earth. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Richmond, L., Middleton, B. R. et al. (2013). Indigenous studies speaks to environmental management. Environmental Management 52(5): 1041–45.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1983). Temps et récit. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Roué, M. and Nakashima, D. (2002). Indigenous knowledge, peoples and sustainable practice. In Timmerman, P. (ed.), Social and Economic Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Vol. 5 of Munn, T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 314–24.Google Scholar
Rouland, N. (1991). Aux confins du droit. Anthropologie juridique de la modernité, Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Santos-Granero, F. and Mentore, G. (eds.) (2006). Special issue in honor of Joanna Overing: In the world and about the world: Amerindian modes of knowledge. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 4(1): 57–80.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2017). Legal translation: A multidimensional endeavour. Comparative Legilinguistics 32: 37–66.Google Scholar
Short, W. J. (2004). A Franciscan language for the 21st century. AFCU Journal: A Franciscan Perspective on Higher Education 1: 1–9.Google Scholar
Silbey, S. (2008). Legal Consciousness in New Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sittler, J. (2004). The Care of the Earth. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M. and Ratner, S. (1999). Appraising the methods of international law: A prospectus for readers, symposium on method in international law. American Journal of International Law 93(2): 291–302.Google Scholar
Sofoulis, Z. (2018). Representation and reality. In Castree, N., Hulme, M. and Proctor, J. D (eds.), Companion to Environmental Studies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 819.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2002). Toward a New Legal Common Sense. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2004). Vers un nouveau sens commun juridique: Droit, science et politique dans la transition paradigmatique. Gonzales Lajoie, N. (trans.). Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de and Rodiguez-Garavito, C. A.. (2005). Law and Globalization from Below. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (2012). The politics of translation. In Venuti, L. (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 312–30.Google Scholar
Spretnak, C. (2011). Relational Reality, New Discoveries of Interrelatedness that Are Transforming the Modern World. Topsham, ME: Green Horizon Books.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1998). After Babel, Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I. Bononno, R. (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stoett, P. J. (2012). Global Ecopolitics: Crisis, Governance and Justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Stoett, P. J. and Omrow, D. A. (2021). Spheres of Transnational Ecoviolence: Environmental Crime, Human Security, and Justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tanasescu, M. (2015). Environment, Political Representation, and the Challenge of Rights: Speaking for Nature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tengö, M. et al. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio 43: 579–91.Google Scholar
Thomas-Pellicer, R., de Lucia, V. and Sullivan, S. (eds.) (2016). Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology: Exploring Re-embodiments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thumbadoo, R. V. (2005). Learning from a Kindergarten Dropout: A Reflection on Elder William Commanda. Ontario: Circle of All Nations.Google Scholar
Trinh, X. T. (2019). Le vertige du cosmos. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) (2015a). Report, Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) (2015b). Report, Principles of Truth and Reconciliation.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2000). Science for the twenty-first century: A new commitment. Official document of the World Conference on Science, Budapest, 7 July 1999.Google Scholar
UNESCO and CIPSH (2017). A New Humanities Agenda for the 21st Century. Outcome document of the World Humanities Conference, 6–11 August, Liège, https://arts-and-society.org/w-h-c-outcome-document/Google Scholar
UNGA Resolution (2011). Harmony with Nature. A/RES/65/164.Google Scholar
UNGA Resolution (2012). The Future We Want. A/RES/66/288.Google Scholar
UNGA Resolution (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
Unger, R. (1976). Law in Modern Society: Towards a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
UN HRC (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur, Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. United Nations General Assembly, A /HRC/40/55.Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General (2010). Report. A/65/314.Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General (2019). Human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. A/74/161.Google Scholar
Vaughan-Lee, L. and Berry, W (eds.) (2013). Spiritual Ecology: The Cry of the Earth. Point Reyes, CA: Golden Sufi Center.Google Scholar
Vernon, M. (2019). Divine transports. Aeon (Nov.), https://aeon.co/essays/how-trance-states-forged-human-society-through-transcendenceGoogle Scholar
Vernon, M. (2020). The four-fold imagination. Aeon (4 Sept.), https://aeon.co/essays/what-we-can-learn-from-william-blakes-visionary-imaginationGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wagner, A., Sin, K. K. and Cheng, Le (eds.) (2014). Ashgate Handbook on Legal Translation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, P. (1978). La réalité de la réalité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. (2016). Expecting the Earth: Life, Culture, Biosemiotics. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of Thoughts. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. ([1953] 1969). Philosophical Investigations. Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
World Summit (2005). Final Document, 24 October 2005, UNGA, 60th session A/RES/60/1.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×