Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:31:41.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Negotiating Co-production: Climbing the Learning Curve

from Epilogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2022

Marie Roué
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Douglas Nakashima
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Igor Krupnik
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

The Epilogue summarizes some key general principles to guide the knowledge co-production process as outlined in the Introduction and individual chapters in the book. To create the new intellectual space for rethinking co-production, it is important to view it as a special path, quite different from the previous agenda of documenting Indigenous people’s knowledge for environmental, management and climate mitigation purposes. Its guiding definition is co-production, as being repeatedly argued by Indigenous constituencies worldwide. The Epilogue also addresses the issues of geographic, cultural and historical inequalities in practising co-production and in the acceptance (inclusion) of its outcomes by agencies, governments and academic science. In the early 21st century, knowledge co-production remains an actively ‘negotiated’ process, whose emerging parameters are to influence its eventual application and outcomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Resilience through Knowledge Co-Production
Indigenous Knowledge, Science, and Global Environmental Change
, pp. 277 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, S. M., Provencher, J. F., Henri, D. A., Taylor, J. J., Lloren, J. I., Nanayakkara, L., Johnson, J. T. and Cooke, S. J. 2019. Bridging Indigenous and science-based knowledge in coastal and marine research, monitoring, and management in Canada. Environmental Evidence, 8: 36.Google Scholar
Behe, C., Daniel, R. and Raymond-Yakoubian, J. 2018. Understanding the Arctic through a Co-production of Knowledge. ACCAP Webinar. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Center for Climate Assessment & Policy, University of Alaska Fairbanks. www.uafaccap.org/event/understanding-the-arctic-through-a-co-production-of-knowledge/Google Scholar
Carlo, N. 2020. Arctic Observing: Indigenous Peoples’ History, Perspectives, and Approaches for Partnership. Fairbanks, AK: Center for Arctic Policy Studies. www.uaf.edu/caps/our-work/Carlo_Arctic-Observing_Indigenous-Peoples-History_CAPS_5MAR2020.pdf (accessed August 14, 2020).Google Scholar
Crate, S. A. and Nuttall, M. 2009. Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
David-Chavez, D. M. and Gavin, M. C. 2018. A global assessment of Indigenous community engagement in climate research. Environment Research Letters https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djenontin, I. N. S. and Meadow, A. M. 2018. The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: Lessons from international practice. Environmental Management, 61: 885903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267–018-1028-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eicken, H., Kaufman, M., Krupnik, I., Pulsifer, P., Apangalook, L., Apangalook, P., Weyapuk, Jr, W. and Leavitt, J. 2014. A framework and database for community sea ice observations in a changing Arctic: An Alaskan prototype for multiple users. Polar Geography, 37(1): 527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2013.873090Google Scholar
Fillipe, A., Renedo, A. and Marston, C. 2017. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403Google Scholar
Forbes, B. C. and Stammler, F. M. 2009. Arctic climate change discourse: The contrasting politics of research agendas in the West and Russia. Polar Research, 28: 2842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. D., Cameron, L., Rubis, J., Maillet, M., Nakashima, D., Willox, A. C. and Pearce, T. 2016. Including Indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports. Nature Climate Change, 6: 349353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway-McLean, K. 2010. Advance Guard: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, Mitigation and Indigenous Peoples – A Compendium of Case Studies. Darwin, NT: United Nations University, Institute for Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS), Traditional Knowledge Initiative, 124 pp.Google Scholar
Huntington, H., Callaghan, T., Fox, S., and Krupnik, I. 2004. Matching Traditional and scientific observations to detect environmental change: A discussion on Arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio, 13: 1823.Google Scholar
Huntington, H., Fox, S., Berkes, F., Krupnik, I. 2005. The Changing Arctic: Indigenous Perspectives. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Scientific Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6198.Google Scholar
IIPFCC, 2014. International Indigenous Peoples’ Forum on Climate Change. Executive Summary of Indigenous Peoples’ Proposal to the UNFCC COP 20 and COP 21. November 2014. Lima, Peru. www.iwgia.org/images/stories/int-processes-eng/UNFCCC/ExecutiveSummaryIPpositionFINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A. (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Johannes, R. E. 1978. Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9: 349364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, R. E. 1981. Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and the Marine Law in the Palau District of Micronesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnik, I. and Bogoslovskaya, L. S. 2017. “Our ice, snow and winds”: From knowledge integration to co-production in the Russian SIKU project, 2007–2013. In Kasten, E., Roller, K. and Wilbur, J. (eds.) Oral History Meets Linguistics. Fürstenberg: Kulturstiftung Sibirien, pp. 3148.Google Scholar
Krupnik, I. and Jolly, D. (eds.) 2002. The Earth Is Faster Now: Indigenous Observations of Arctic Environmental Change. Fairbanks, AK: ARCUS (2nd edition 2010).Google Scholar
Krupnik, I., Rubis, J. T. and Nakashima, D. 2018. Indigenous knowledge for climate change assessment and adaptation: Epilogue. In Nakashima, D., Rubis, J. and Krupnik, I. (eds.) Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment and Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 280290.Google Scholar
Lemos, M. C. and Morehouse, B. J. 2005. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change, 15(1): 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macchi, M. 2008. Indigenous and Traditional Peoples and Climate Change. Issues Paper. IUCN http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/Indigenous_peoples_climate_change.pdf (accessed April 12, 2015).Google Scholar
McDonald, M., Arragutainaq, L. and Novalinga, Z., comps. 1997. Voices from the Bay: Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Inuit and Cree in the Hudson Bay Bioregion Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resource Committee, and Sanikiluaq. NWT: Environmental Committee of Municipality of Sanikiluaq.Google Scholar
McElwee, P., Fernández-Llamazares, A., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Babai, D., Bates, P., Galvin, K., Guèze, M., Liu, J., Molnár, Z., Ngo, H. T., Reyes-García, V., Chowdhury, R. R., Samakov, A., Shrestha, U. B., Díaz, S. and Brondízio, E. S. 2020. Working with Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in large-scale ecological assessments: Reviewing the experience of the IPBES Global Assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, D., Rubis, J. and Krupnik, I. (eds.) 2018. Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment and Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakashima, D., Galloway-McLean, K. G., Thulstrup, H., Ramos Castillo, A. and Rubis, J. T. 2012. Weathering Uncertainty: Traditional Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment and Adaptation. UNESCO and UNU.Google Scholar
Oozeva, C., Noongwook, C., Noongwook, G., Alowa, C. and Krupnik, I. 2004. Watching Ice and Weather Our Way/Sikimengllu Eslamengllu Esghapalleghput. Washington DC: Arctic Studies Center, Savoonga Whaling Captains Association, and Marine Mammal Commission.Google Scholar
Orlove, B., Lazrus, H., Hovelsrud, G. K. and Giannini, A. 2014. Recognitions and responsibilities on the origins and consequences of the uneven attention to climate change around the world. Current Anthropology, 55: 249275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osherenko, G. 1988. Can co-management save arctic wildlife? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 30(6): 634.Google Scholar
Riedel, A. and Bodle, R. 2018. Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform: Potential Governance Arrangements under the Paris Agreement. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roué, M. and Molnár, Z. 2017. Knowing Our Lands and Resources: Indigenous and Local Knowledge of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Europe and Central Asia. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Roué, M. and Nakashima, D. 2002. Knowledge and foresight: The predictive capacity of traditional knowledge applied to environmental assessment. International Social Science Journal, 54(173): 337347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salick, J. and Byg, A. (eds.) 2007. Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change. Oxford: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.Google Scholar
Salick, J. and Ross, N. 2009. Traditional peoples and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19: 137139.Google Scholar
Thorpe, N., Hakognak, N., Eyegetok, S. and Kitikmeot Elders. 2001. Thunder on the Tundra: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit of the Bathurst Caribou. Vancouver: Tuktu and Nogak Project.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, 2007. ‘United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’. Resolution adopted 13 September 2007. www.un.org/development/desa/Indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-Indigenous-peoples.html (last accessed March 26, 2021).Google Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 9 May 1992. S. Treaty Doc No. 102-38, 1771 U.N.T.S. 107.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×