Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Theorizing ideational continuity: The resilience of neo-liberal ideas in Europe
- Part I Economy, state, and society
- Part II Neo-liberalism in major policy domains
- 5 The collapse of the Brussels–Frankfurt consensus and the future of the euro
- 6 Supranational neo-liberalization: The EU's regulatory model of economic markets
- 7 Resilient neo-liberalism in European financial regulation
- 8 Neo-liberalism and the working-class hero: From organized to flexible labour markets
- 9 European corporate governance: Is there an alternative to neo-liberalism?
- Part III Neo-liberalism in comparative perspective
- Part IV Conclusion
- Index
- References
6 - Supranational neo-liberalization: The EU's regulatory model of economic markets
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Theorizing ideational continuity: The resilience of neo-liberal ideas in Europe
- Part I Economy, state, and society
- Part II Neo-liberalism in major policy domains
- 5 The collapse of the Brussels–Frankfurt consensus and the future of the euro
- 6 Supranational neo-liberalization: The EU's regulatory model of economic markets
- 7 Resilient neo-liberalism in European financial regulation
- 8 Neo-liberalism and the working-class hero: From organized to flexible labour markets
- 9 European corporate governance: Is there an alternative to neo-liberalism?
- Part III Neo-liberalism in comparative perspective
- Part IV Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Analysis of EU regulation of markets leads into ‘the seventh circle’ (of hell, purgatory, or paradise, depending on individual taste) of European neo-liberalism. The EU's core function is regulation and it is the leading exponent of neo-liberal regulation in Europe. Since the 1980s, it has developed a dominant set of ideas centred on competition to achieve a ‘single European market’ that is sufficiently integrated and coherent to be called a ‘model’.
Although the neo-liberal content of the regulatory model is often taken for granted in public and academic debates about the EU, this chapter argues that it was not legally or ideationally inevitable. Indeed, between the 1960s and 1980s, attractive alternatives were available and neo-liberalism appeared to be an unlikely candidate for ideational dominance. However, a powerful coalition of the European Commission, European Court of Justice (ECJ), national governments, and large firms has formed to support the EU's neo-liberal regulatory model. The coalition is heterogeneous, and it has widened and deepened over time as key actors have altered their position.
Thus, the development of a powerful coalition that favours neo-liberal ideas requires analysis rather than simply being presumed on the basis of the EU’s legal and institutional framework. Equally, changes over time must be accounted for. In response, the analysis shows how and why the key features of neo-liberalism – its breadth and ambiguities, the combination of competition and a strong state, and its apparent political neutrality through reliance on rules and ‘markets’ –make it attractive at the EU level.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy , pp. 171 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, and . 1998. The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (2): 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2010. ‘Revisiting 50 Years of Market-Making: The Neoliberal Transformation of EC Competition Policy’, Review of International Political Economy, 17 (1): 20–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2011. The Politics of European Competition Regulation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
, and . 2005. ‘Competence Allocation in the EU Competition Policy System as an Interest-Driven Process’, Journal of Public Policy 25 (3): 313–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, . 2012. ‘Writing Straight with Crooked Lines: Competition Policy and Services of General Interest in the Treaty of Lisbon’. In EU Law after Lisbon, edited by , , and (347–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. ‘Institutions and Policy Change in the European Communities: The Case of Merger Control’, Public Administration 72: 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and . 2007. Policy Transfer in the European Union: Regulating the Utilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, and . 2009. Competition Policy in the European Union, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2006. ‘Privatizing Public Enterprises in the European Union: Pragmatic, Ideological, Inevitable?’, Journal of European Public Policy 13 (5): 736–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2010. ‘European Business–Government Relations’. In The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, edited by , , and (285–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2009. Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘When “Bolkestein” Is Trapped by the French Anti-Liberal Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy 17 (8): 1253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Best Practices in the Conduct of Merger Control Proceedings. Brussels: DG Competition.
. 2009. ‘Incomplete Contracting, Commission Discretion and the Origins of EU Merger Control’, Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (3): 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. ‘Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization’, International Organization 56 (1): 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2012. EU Guidelines for the Application of State Aid Rules in Relation to the Rapid Deployment of Broadband Networks. Brussels, December 2012, C(2012) 9609/2.Google Scholar
. 1991. Judgement of the Court of 19 March 1991 in Case C-202/88: French Republic v. Commission of the European Communities (Competition in the Markets in Telecommunications Terminal Equipment) 91/C 96/04, OJ C96/06, 12.04.91.
. 1992. Judgement of the Court of 17 November 1992 in Joined Cases C-271, C-281, and C-289/90: Kingdom of Spain and Others v. Commission of the European Communities (Competition in the Markets for Telecommunications Services) 92/C 326/08’, OJ C326/8, 11.12.92.
. 2011. Creative Reconstructions: Multilateralism and European Varieties of Capitalism after 1950. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Law and Competition in Twentieth-Century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Telecommunications Policy-Making in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2011. ‘The French Debate over the Bolkestein Directive’, Comparative European Politics 9: 344–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ‘The Evolution of Varieties of Capitalism in Europe’. In Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, edited by , , and (39–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2011. ‘The Coming of Age of EU Regulation of Network Industries and Services of General Interest’. In The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed., edited by and (743–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1995. Industrial Enterprise and European Integration: From National to Internationalized Champions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2002. ‘Public-Interest Services Revisited’, Journal of European Public Policy 9:6 995–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2006. ‘Globalization, the European Union, and Domestic Governance in Telecoms and Electricity,’ Governance 19 (3): 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
. 2010. ‘Collegiality and the Politics of European Competition Policy’, European Union Politics 11 (1): 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2009. ‘Bringing Regulatory Processes Back In: The Reform of EU Antitrust and Merger Control’, West European Politics 32 (4): 738–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006. ‘Industrial Policy and Competition Law and Policy’, Fordham International Law Journal 30: 1401–12.Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘The EU's SIEC Test Five Years On: Has It Made a Difference?’, European Competition Journal 6 (1): 211–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ‘Comparing New Modes of Governance in Action’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (2): 343–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2011. ‘Competition Law Modernization: An Evolutionary Tale?’. In The Evolution of EU Law (2nd edition), edited by and (717–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe’, West European Politics 17 (3): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
, and . 1996. ‘Towards a European Regulatory State’, Journal of European Public Policy 3 (4): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. ‘The First Supranational Policy in the European Union: Competition Policy’, European Journal of Political Research 28 (2): 141–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. ‘Understanding the Regulatory State’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Airbus: L’ambition européenne: Logique d’Etat, logique de marché. Paris: L’Harmatten.Google Scholar
, and . 2007. ‘Mutual Recognition ‘on Trial’: The Long Road to Services Liberalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 14 (5): 717–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001a. ‘Making EU Network Markets Competitive’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17 (3): 432–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. ‘The GSM Standard: Explaining a Success Story’, Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 432–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization 42 (3): 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.). 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
, and (eds.). 1998. European Integration and Supranatural Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
. 2008. ‘Services of General Economic Interest and Universal Service in EU Law’, European Law Review 33 (2): 167–93.Google Scholar
. 1996. ‘Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States’. In Governance in the European Union, edited by , , , and (15–39). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. ‘Sterile Debates and Dubious Generalisations: European Integration Theory Tested by Telecommunications and Electricity’, Journal of Public Policy 16 (3): 233–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. ‘Only and Agenda Setter? The European Commission's Power over the Council of Ministers’, European Union Politics 1 (1): 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. ‘The Impact of Mutual Recognition: Inbuilt Limits and Domestic Responses to the Single Market’, Journal of European Public Policy 6: 935–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ‘Mutual Recognition as a New Mode of Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 14 (5): 667–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. From State to Market? The Transformation of French Business and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2009. Law and Economics in European Merger Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. ‘Changing Patterns of European Community Utilities Law: An Institutional Hypothesis’. In New Legal Dynamics of European Integration, edited by Jo Shaw and Gillian More. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. ‘“New” Governance in European Union Policy Making: Policy Innovation or Political Compromise in European Telecommunications?’, West European Politics 34 (5): 1114–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. ‘Autonomy by the Rules: The European Commission and the Development of State Aid Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. States of Liberalization: Redefining the Public Sector in Integrated Europe. Albany: State University of New York Press.
. 2007. Internationalisation and Economic Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2011. ‘The Creation of European Regulatory Agencies and its Limits: A Comparative Analysis of European Delegation’, Journal of European Public Policy 18 (6): 790–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2006. European Competition Law and Economics: A Comparative Perspective. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘Competition Policy’. In The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, edited by , , and (730–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘Discretion by the Rules: European State Aid Policy and the 1999 Procedural Regulation’, Journal of European Public Policy 17 (7): 954–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14
- Cited by