Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T15:58:50.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2018

Christina J. Schneider
Christina J. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Responsive Union
National Elections and European Governance
 , pp. 312 - 333
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrajano, Marisa A., Elmendorf, Christopher S., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2018. “Label vs. Pictures: Treatment-Mode Effects in Experiments About Discrimination.” Political Analysis 26: 20–33.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2006. Evaluating Political Decision-Making Models. In The European Union Decides, eds. Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, Christopher H., and König, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 264–298.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2015. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Governments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ackrill, Robert and Kay, Adrian. 2006. “The EU Financal Perspective 2007–13 and the Forces That Shaped the Final Agreement.” Discussion Papers in Applied Economics and Policy No. 2006/1.Google Scholar
Aksoy, Deniz. 2010. “Who Gets What, When, and How Revisited: Voting and Proposal Powers in the Allocation of the EU Budget.” European Union Politics 11(2):171–194.Google Scholar
Aksoy, Deniz. 2012. “Institutional Arrangements and Logrolling: Evidence from the European Union.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3):538–552.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexandrova, Petya, Rasmussen, Anne, and Toshkov, Dimiter. 2016. “Agenda Responsiveness in the European Council.” West European Politics 39(4): 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E. and Lassen, David Dreyer. 2006. “Transparency, Political Participation, and Political Budget Cycles in OECD Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3):530–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. 1995. “The Dynamics of Public Support for Coalition Governments.” Comparative Political Studies 28:350–383.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jeffrey J., ed. 1999. Regional Integration and Democracy. Expanding on the European Experience. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Arnold, Christine, Sapir, Eliyahu V., and de Vries, Catherine E.. 2012. “Parties’ Positions on European Integration: Issue Congruence, Ideology or Context?” West European Politics 35(6):1341–1362.Google Scholar
Arregui, Javier. 2008. “Shifting Policy Positions in the European Union.” European Journal of Political Research 47:852–875.Google Scholar
Arregui, Javier, Stokman, Frans N., and Thomson, Robert. 2004. “Bargaining in the European Union and Shifts in Actors’ Policy Positions.” European Union Politics 5(1):47–72.Google Scholar
Arregui, Javier, Stokman, Frans N., and Thomson, Robert. 2006. Compromise, Exchange and Challenge in the European Union. In The European Union Decides, eds. Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, Christopher H., and König, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–152.Google Scholar
Arregui, Javier and Thomson, Robert. 2009. “States’ Bargaining Success in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 16(5):655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott and de Mesquita, Ethan Bueno. 2014. “Is Voter Competence Good for Voters?: Information, Rationality, and Democratic Performance.” American Political Science Review 108(3):565–587.Google Scholar
Aspinwall, Mark. 2002. “Preferring Europe: Ideology and National Preference on European Integration.” European Union Politics 3(1):81–111.Google Scholar
2007. “Government Preferences in European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories.” British Journal of Political Science 37(1): 89–114.Google Scholar
Atikcan, Ece Özlem. 2015. Framing the European Union: The Power of Political Arguments in Shaping European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38(1):226–254.Google Scholar
Bachtler, John, Mendez, Carlos, and Wishlade, Fiona. 2016. EU Cohesion Policy and European Integration: The Dynamics of EU Budget and Regional Policy Reform. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailer, Stefanie. 2004. “Bargaining Success in the European Union: The Impact of Exogenous and Endogenous Power Resources.” European Union Politics 5(1):99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailer, Stefanie. 2006. Nationale Interessen in der Europäischen Union. Macht und Verhandlungser-folg im Ministerrat. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Bailer, Stefanie, Mattila, Mikko, and Schneider, Gerald. 2015. “Money Makes the EU Go Round: The Objective Foundations of Conflict in the Council of Ministers.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53(3):437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, David and Sherrington, Philippa. 2005. “Britain and Europe: The Dog that Didn’t Bark.” Parliamentary Affairs 12(24):125–176.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1):194–230.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. The Study of Electoral Behavior. In The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, ed. Leighley, Jan E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 14.Google Scholar
Bechtel, Michael, Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam M.. 2014. “Preferences for International Redistribution: The Divide Over the Eurozone Bailouts.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4):835–856.Google Scholar
Bechtel, Michael, Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam M.. 2017. “Policy Design and Domestic Support for International Bailouts.” European Journal of Political Research 56(4):864–886.Google Scholar
Benedetto, Giacomo and Høyland, Bjørn. 2007. “The EU Annual Budgetary Procedure: The Existing Rules and Proposed Reforms of the Convention and Intergovernmental Conference 2002–04.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45(3):565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berry, William, Golder, Matt, and Milton, Daniel. 2012. “Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction.” Journal of Politics 74(3):653–671.Google Scholar
Birch, Anthony. 1964. Representative and Responsible Government. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Carina S. 2013. “Electorally Unstable by Supply or Demand? An Examination of the Causes of Electoral Volatility in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Public Choice 156(3):537–561.Google Scholar
Blair, Tony. 2011. A Journey: My Political Life. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Bølstadt, Jørgen. 2015. “Dynamics of European Integration: Public Opinion in the Core and Periphery.” European Union Politics 16(1):23–44.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja. 2005. “Mind the Gap! European Integration Between Level and Scope.” Journal of European Public Policy 12(2):217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja and Risse, Thomas. 2009. “Revisiting the Nature of the Beast -Politicization, European Identity, and Postfunctionalism: A Comment on Hooghe and Marks.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1):217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, David. 2002. “Coreper Revisited.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2):215–234.Google Scholar
Thomas, Brambor, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1):63–82.Google Scholar
Bräuninger, Thomas and König, Thomas. 2005. Indices of Power IOP 2.0 [computer program]. [www.tbraeuninger.de/IOP.html]. University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Brender, Adi and Drazen, Allan. 2005. “Political Budget Cycles in New versus Established Democracies.” Journal of Monetary Economics 52:1271–1295.Google Scholar
Brown, Gordon. 2005. Global Europe: Full-employment Europe. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and Stokman, Frans N.. 1994. Twelve into One: Models of Decision-Making in the European Community . New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer, Simon. 2008. “New Labour, New European Policy? Blair, Brown, and Utilitarian Supranationalism.” Parliamentary Affairs 61(4):597–620.Google Scholar
Bundeskanzlerin, . 2010. “A Solution for Greece: ‘An Important Day for the Euro.’” Statement of the Federal Chancellor. URL: www.bundeskanzlerin.de/Content/EN/Artikel/2010/03/2010-03-26-eu-rat-hilfen-griechenland_en.html Google Scholar
Bundesregierung. 2010. “Regierungserklärung von Bundeskanzlerin Merkel zu den Hilfen für Griechenland.” Statement of the Federal Chancellor. URL: www.bundesregierung.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Regierungser klaerung/2010/2010–05-05-merkel-erklaerung-griechenland.html Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie and Mattli, Walter. 1993. “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” International Organization 47(1): 41–76.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. and Powell, Eleanor Neff. 2014. “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” The Journal of Politics 76(2):492–505.Google Scholar
Caramani, Daniele. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111(1):54–67.Google Scholar
Caraway, Teri L., Rickard, Stephanie J., and Anner, Mark S.. 2012. “International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality.” International Organization 66(1):27–61.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 1997. “Net Financial Transfers in the European Union: Who Gets What and Why?” Journal of Politics 59(2):469–496.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2001. “The Electoral Connection in European Union Politics.” Journal of Politics 63(1):141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew J., and Hankla, Charles. 2008. “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice.” American Political Science Review 102(4):435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew and Heffernan, Richard. 2003. Britain in the World, Labour in the European Union. In The New Labour Reader, eds. Chadwick, Andrew and Heffernan, Richard. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 223–224.Google Scholar
Chaudoin, Stephen. 2014. “Audience Features and the Strategic Timing of Trade Disputes.” International Organization 68(1):235–256.Google Scholar
Clark, Nick and Rohrschneider, Robert. 2009. “Second-Order Elections versus First-Order Thinking: How Voters Perceive the Representation Process in a Multi-Layered System of Governance.” Journal of European Integration 31(5):645–664.Google Scholar
Clark, William R. 2002. Capitalism Not Globalism: Capital Mobility, and the Political Control of the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Clark, William R. and Hallerberg, Mark. 2000. “Mobile Capital, Domestic Institutions, and Electorally Induced Monetary and Fiscal Policy.” American Political Science Review 94(2):323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coen, David and Richardson, Jeremy J., eds. 2009. Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D. and Keohane, Robert O.. 2017. “The Liberal Order Is Rigged.” Foreign Affairs 96: 36–44.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 2005. Note from the Presidency of Council of EU to European Council: Financial Perspective 2007–2013. Technical Report Council of the European Union. 15915/05 (CADREFIN 268), December 19.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. “Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 31(1):82–108.Google Scholar
Cramme, Olaf and Hobolt, Sara B., eds. 2015. Democratic Politics in a European Union under Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 1996. “Legislative Procedures in the European Community.” British Journal of Political Science 26(2):199–228.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 1997. “The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1):97–119.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 2003. “The Democratic Deficit in the European Union: Much Ado about Nothing?” European Union Politics 4(1):101–120.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe and Høyland, Bjørn. 2015. “The Budgetary Procedure in the European Union and the Implications of the Treaty of Lisbon.” European Union Politics 16(1):67–89.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe, Steunenberg, Bernard, and Corbett, Richard. 2000. “Understanding the EU Legislative Process.” European Union Politics 1(3):363–381.Google Scholar
Cross, James P. 2012. “Everyone’s a Winner (Almost): Bargaining Success in the Council of Ministers of the European Union.” European Union Politics 14(1):70–94.Google Scholar
Cruz, Cesi and Schneider, Christina J.. 2017. “Foreign Aid and Undeserved Credit Claiming.” American Journal of Political Science 61(2):396–408.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1973. Polygarchy: Participation and Opposition . Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1999. Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Sceptic’s View. In Democracy’s Edges, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–36.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. “Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism.” International Organization 59(2):363–398.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1985. “Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations.” Comparative Political Studies 18(3):267–299.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2000. The Decline of Party Identifications. In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, eds. Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., McAllister, Ian and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 2000. The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment. In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, eds. Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–63.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2000. Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, Ruth and Hooghe, Marc. 2017. “Economic Indicators and Electoral Volatility. Economic Effects on Electoral Volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013.” Comparative European Politics 15(6):919–943.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2004. “International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization.” American Political Science Review 98(1):153–169.Google Scholar
de Bruycker, Iskander. 2017. “Politicization and the Public Interest: When do the Elites in Brussels Address Public Interests in EU Policy Debates?” European Union Politics 18(4):603–619.Google Scholar
de Haan, Jakob and Sturm, Jan-Egbert. 2000. “Do Financial Markets and the Maastricht Treaty Discipline Governments? New Evidence.” Applied Financial Economics 10:221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E. 2007. “Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects Vote Choice in National Elections.” European Union Politics 8(3):363–385.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E. 2009. “The Impact of EU Referenda on National Electoral Politics: Evidence from the Dutch Case.” West European Politics 32(1):142–171.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E. 2010. “EU Issue Voting: Asset or Liability? How European Integration Affects Parties’ Electoral Fortunes.” European Union Politics 11(1):89–117.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E. and Hobolt, Sara B.. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: the Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13(2):246–268.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E. and Steenbergen, Marco. 2013. “Variable Opinions: The Predictability of Support for Unification in European Mass Publics.” Journal of Political Marketing 12(1):121–141.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E., Van der Brug, Wouter, van Egmond, Marcel, and Van der Eijk, Cees. 2011. “Individual and Contextual Variation in EU Issue Voting: The Role of Political Information.” Electoral Studies 30(1):16–28.Google Scholar
de Wilde, Pieter. 2011. “No Polity for Old Politics A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration.” Journal of European Integration 33(5):559–575.Google Scholar
de Wilde, Pieter and Zürn, Michael. 2012. “Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed?” Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 766–783.Google Scholar
Dellmuth, Lisa M. and Tallberg, Jonas. 2015. “The Social Legitimacy of International Organisations: Interest Representation, Institutional Performance, and Confidence Extrapolation in the United Nations.” Review of International Studies 41(3):451–475.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash and Londregan, John. 1998. “Fiscal Federalism and Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Public Economics 68:153–180.Google Scholar
Dolezal, Martin and Hellström, Johan. 2016. The Radical Right as Driving Force in the Electoral Arena? In Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics, eds. Hutter, Swen, Grande, Edgar, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–180.Google Scholar
Döring, Holger and Manow, Philip. 2015. “Parliaments and Governments database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.” Development Version.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65(2): 135–150.Google Scholar
Drazen, Allan. 2000a. “The Political Business Cycle after 25 Years.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15:75–117.Google Scholar
Drazen, Allan.2000b. Political Economy in Macroeconomics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel and Vaubel, Roland. 2004. “Do IMF and IBRD Cause Moral Hazard and Political Business Cycles? Evidence from Panel Data.” Open Economies Review 15:5–22.Google Scholar
Druel, Elisabeth, Chrzanowski, Pierre, Pollock, Rufus, and Gray, Jonathan. 2015. “Where Does Europe’s Money Go?” Open Knowledge Report. URL: www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_1.4.3.pdf Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2010. “The Global Economy, Competency, and the Economic Vote.” Journal of Politics 72(1):105–123.Google Scholar
Dullien, Sebastian and Schwarzer, Daniela. 2009. “Bringing Macroeconomics into the EU Budget Debate: Why and How?” Journal of Common Market Studies 47(1):153–174.Google Scholar
Dür, Andreas and González, Gemma M.. 2007. “Hard and Soft Bargaining in the EU: Negotiating the Financial Perspective, 2007–2013.” Paper Presented at the European Union Studies Association, 17–19 May, Montreal.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Elgström, Ole and Jönsson, Christer. 2000. “Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or Problem-solving?” Journal of European Public Policy 7(5): 684–704.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1999. “Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission of Budgetary Discipline and Improvment of the Budgetary Procedure.” Official Journal of the European Communities, 1999/C 172/01.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2004. “Building our Common Future” – Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union. Technical Report European Commission. COM(2004)101 final/2, February 26.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2008. European Union Public Finance. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. European Union Public Finance. 5th ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2014. “Activity Report on Codecision and Conciliation, 2009–2014.” No. 1031024.Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2016. “The Budgetary Procedure.” Fact Sheets on the European Union. URL: www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_1.4.3.pdf Google Scholar
European Union. 2010. “Statement by the Heads of State and Government of the Euro Area.” Consilium. URL: www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/ 113563.pdfGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey. 1998. “Euroscepticism and Conservative Electoral Support: How an Asset Became a Liability.” British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 573–590.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey. 2002. European Integration, Party Politics, and Voting in the 2001 Election. In British Elections and Parties Review, eds.. Bennie, Lynn, Rallings, Colin, Tonge, Jonathan, and Webb, Paul. London: Frank Cass Publishers, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Finke, Daniel, König, Thomas, Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Tsebelis, George. 2012. Reforming the European Union. Realizing the Impossible. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark and Wlezien, Christopher. 1997. “The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9(3):347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Mackie, Thomas T., and Valen, Henry. 1992. Electoral Change. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert Jr. 2002. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 5:369–421.Google Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3):533–562.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998. “Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories.” The Journal of Politics 60(2):333–354.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 2000. “European Integration, Voters, and National Politics.” West European Politics 23(4):52–72.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. and Scheve, Kenneth. 2007. “Mixed Messages: Party Dissent and Mass Opinion on European Integration.” European Union Politics 8(1):37–59.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, Laver, Michael, and Mair, Peter. 2011. Representative Government in Modern Europe. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gali, Jordi and Perotti, Roberto. 2003. “Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe.” Economic Policy 18(37):533–572.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, Daniel Keleman, R. and Schulz, Heiner. 1998. “The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization 52(1):149–176.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Tsebelis, George. 1996. “An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism.” International Organization 50(2):269–299.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Tsebelis, George. 2001. “The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.” International Organization 55(2): 357–390.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls so Variable When Votes are so Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23(4):409–451.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2008. Case Selection for Case Study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques. In Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 645–684.Google Scholar
Giger, Nathalie and Klüver, Heike. 2016. “Voting against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 60(1):190–205.Google Scholar
Golub, Jonathan. 2007. “Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-Making.” European Union Politics 8(2):155–179.Google Scholar
Golub, Jonathan. 2008. “The Study of Decision-Making Speed in the European Union: Methods, Data and Theory.” European Union Politics 9(1):167–179.Google Scholar
Golub, Jonathan and Steunenberg, Bernard. 2007. “How Time Affects EU Decision-Making.” European Union Politics 8(4):555–566.Google Scholar
Gowland, David, Turner, Arthur, and Wright, Alex. 2010. Britain and European Integration Since 1945: On the Sidelines. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia. 2009. “International Organization as a Seal of Approval: European Union Accession and Investor Risk.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 931–949.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia. 2013. The Company States Keep: International Organizations and Investor Perceptions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia and Kucik, Jeffrey. 2017. Leadership Turnover and the Durability of International Trade Commitments. Comparative Political Studies 50(14): 1941–1972.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia and Hicks, Raymond. 2014. “Reputations, Perceptions, and International Economic Agreements.” International Interactions 40 (3): 325–349.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2012. “A Giant Fast Asleep? Party Incentives and the Politicisation of European Integration.” Political Studies 60:115–130.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Justin. 1997. Representing Interests in the European Union. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd. Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Messing, Solomon, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2012. “How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation.” American Political Science Review 106(4):704–719.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Westwood, Sean J., and Messing, Solomon. 2014. The Impression of Influence: Legislator Communication, Representation, and Democratic Accountability . Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1958. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Häge, Frank M. 2011. “The European Union Policy-Making Dataset.” European Union Politics 12(3):455–477.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Sara, Bailer, Stefanie, and Herzog, Alexander. 2016. “Signals to Their Parliaments? Governments’ Strategic Use of Votes and Policy Statements in the EU Council.” Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Sara and De Clerck-Sachsse, Julia. 2007. “Decision-Making in the Council of Ministers: Evaluating the Facts.” CEPS Policy Brief No. 119.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Sara, Hobolt, Sara B., and Wratil, Christopher. 2016. “Government Responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council Voting.” Comparative Political Studies 50(6):850–876.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices Via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22(1):1–30.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark, de Souza, Lucio Vinhas, and Clark, William R.. 2002. “Political Business Cycles in EU Accession Countries.” European Union Politics 3(2):231–250.Google Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona. 2009. Least Accessible but Not Inaccessible: Lobbying the Council and the European Council. In Lobbying the European Union, eds. Coen, David and Richardson, Jeremy J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70–88.Google Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, Van Aken, Wim, and Wallace, Helen. 2006. “When and Why the EU Council of Ministers Votes Explicitly.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1):161–94.Google Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona and Wallace, Helen. 2006. The Council of Ministers . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan Press Ltd. Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Dorothee. 2005. “The Institution of ‘Consensus’ in the European Union: Formal versus Informal Decision-Making in the Council.” European Journal of Political Research 44(1):65–90.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Dorothee. 2007. Merkel’s EU Policy: “Kohl’s Mädchen” or Interest-driven Politics? In Launching the Grand Coalition: The 2005 Bundestag Election and the Future of German Politics, ed. Langenbacher, Eric. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 110–121.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Gisela. 1991. Germany and European Integration, the Common Agricultural Policy: An Area of Conflict. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Hertz, Robin and Leuffen, Dirk. 2011. “Too Big to Run? Analyzing the Impact of Enlargement on the Speed of EU Decision-Making.” European Union Politics 12(2):193–215.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2008. What’s Wrong with the European Union & and How to Fix it. Manchester: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon and Lord, Christopher. 1997. Political Parties in the European Union . New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gérard. 2006. “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–511.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2015. “The 2014 European Parliament Elections: Divided in Unity?” Journal of Common Market Studies 53:6–23.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. and de Vries, Catherine E.. 2016. “Public Support for European Integration.” Annual Review of Political Science 19:413–432.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. and Klemmensen, Robert. 2005. “Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark.” Political Studies 53(2):379–402.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. and Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2012. “Motivating the European Voter: Parties, Issues and Campaigns in European Parliament Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 51:701–727.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Tilley, James. 2008. “A Vote against Europe? Explaining Defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1):93–115.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. and Tilley, James. 2014. Blaming Europe? Responsibility without Accountability in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Isabell and de Vries, Catherine. 2016. “Brexit Has Raised Support for the European Union.” Flashlight Europe, Bertelsman Stiftung.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2009. “Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Houweling, Robert Van and Tomz, Mike. 2016a. “Political Repositioning.” Princeton University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Houweling, Robert Van and Tomz, Mike. 2016b. “Political Repositioning: A Conjoint Analysis.” Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, NH: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2003. “Endogenous Preferences and Delegation in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 36(1):41–74.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon and König, Thomas. 2002. “In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference.” International Organization 56(2):447–476.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon and Schulz, Tobias. 2007. “Referendums in the EU’s Constitution Building Process.” The Review of International Organizations 2(2):177–218.Google Scholar
Hutter, Swen, Grande, Edgar, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, eds. 2016. Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IFOP. 2010. “Europeans and the Greek Crisis.” IFOP Report.Google Scholar
URL: www.ifop.fr/media/poll/1118-2-study_file.pdf Google Scholar
Infratest Dimap. 2010. ARD DeutschlandTREND – November 2010. Technical Report Infratest Dimap. URL: www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/ard-deutschlandtrend/2010/november Google Scholar
Infratest Dimap. 2011. ARD DeutschlandTREND – November 2011. Technical Report Infratest Dimap. URL: www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/ard-deutschlandtrend/2011/november/Google Scholar
Irwin, Galen A. and Thomassen, Jacques J. A.. 1975. “Issue-Consensus in a Multi-Party System: Voters and Leaders in the Netherlands.” Acta Politica 10(4):389–420.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. 1995. The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477– 1806. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. Running Scared: Elections and Congressional Politics in the 1980s. In Congress. Structure and Policy, eds. McCubbins, Mathew D. and Sullivan, Terry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–81.Google Scholar
Joseph, Sarah. 2011. Blame It on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey, Banducci, Susan A., and Bowler, Shaun. 2003. “To Know It Is to Love It? Satisfaction with Democracy in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 36(3):271–292.Google Scholar
Kayser, Mark A. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 50(3):365–394.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40(1):1–27.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 1997. Running Scared. Why American Politicians Campaign Too Much and Govern So Little. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kleine, Mareike and Minaudier, Clement. 2018. “Negotiating Under Political Uncertainty: National Elections and the Dynamics of International Cooperation.” British Journal of Political Science (forthcoming), doi:10.1017/S000712341600051X.Google Scholar
Klüver, Heike. 2013. Lobbying in the European Union. Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klüver, Heike, Braun, Caelesta, and Beyers, Jan. 2015. “Legislative Lobbying in Context: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Interest Group Lobbying in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 22(4):447–461.Google Scholar
Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. 2004. “Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy.” International Organization 58(4):137–174.Google Scholar
Kölling, Mario and Leal, Cristina Serrano. 2014. “An Analysis of the Agreement on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014–2020.” Real Instituto Elcano Working Paper No. 2/2014.Google Scholar
König, Thomas. 2007. “Divergence or Convergence? From Ever-growing to Ever-slowing European Legislative Decision Making.” European Journal of Political Research 46(3):417–444.Google Scholar
König, Thomas. 2008. “Analysing the Process of EU Legislative Decision-Making: To Make a Long Story Short …” European Union Politics 9(1):145–165.Google Scholar
König, Thomas and Bräuninger, Thomas. 2002. From an Ever-Growing towards an Ever-slower Union? In Institutional Challenges in the European Union, eds. Hosli, Madeleine O., van Deemen, Adrian, and Widgrén, Mika. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 155–172.Google Scholar
König, Thomas and Finke, Daniel. 2007. “Reforming the Equilibrium? Veto Players and Policy Change in the European Constitution-building Process.” The Review of International Organizations 2(2):153–176.Google Scholar
König, Thomas and Junge, Dirk. 2009. “Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power?” European Union Politics 10(4):507–534.Google Scholar
König, Thomas and Pöter, Mirja. 2001. “Examining the EU Legislative Process: The Relative Importance of Agenda and Veto Power.” European Union Politics 2(3):329–351.Google Scholar
König, Thomas and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2006. “From Unanimity to Consensus. An Analysis of the Negotiations at the EU’s Constitutional Convention.” World Politics 58:413–445.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul, eds. 2010. The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1986–1964.” American Political Science Review 65(1):131–143.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2007. “The Role of European Integration in National Election Campaigns.” European Union Politics 8(1):83–108.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter and Grande, Edgar. 2016. The Euro Crisis: A Boost to the Politicisation of European Integration? In Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics, ed. Hutter, Swen, Grande, Edgar, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–276.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic, Hutter, Swen, and Wüest, Bruno. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Tresch, Anke, and Jochum, Margit. 2007. “Going Public in the European Union: Action Repertoires of Western European Collective Political Actors.” Comparative Political Studies 40(1):48–73.Google Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 1999. “The Berlin Summit: Process and Outcome of the Agenda 2000 Budgetary Proposals.” European Community Studies Association Review 12(4):6–8.Google Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 2000. “The Big Budgetary Bargains: From Negotiation to Authority.” Journal of European Public Policy 7(5):725–743.Google Scholar
Laffan, Brigid and Lindner, Johannes. 2014. The Budget. Who Gets What, When and How? In Policy-Making in the European Union, eds. Wallace, Helen, Pollack, Mark A., and Young, Alasdair R.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–242.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Who Gets What, When, and How. New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
Le Cacheux, Jacques. 2005 European Budget: The Poisonous Budget Rebate Debate. Technical Report Notre Europe. Notre Europe Studies & Research No. 41.Google Scholar
Le Cacheux, Jacques. 2008. “European Budget: The Poisonous Budget Rebate Debate.” Notre Europe Etudes & Recherches Working Paper No. 41.Google Scholar
Lee, Chung Hee. 2011. “The UK’s Negotiation of Its EU Budget Rebate.” Phd diss. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Leuffen, Dirk and Hertz, Robin. 2010. “If Things Can Only Get Worse: Anticipation of Enlargement in European Union Legislative Politics.” European Journal of Political Research 49(1):53–74.Google Scholar
Leuffen, Dirk, Rittberger, Berthold, and Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2013. Differentiated Integration. Explaining Variation in the European Union . Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Leventoğlu, Bahar and Tarar, Ahmer. 2005. “Pre-Negotiation Public Commitment in Domestic and International Bargaining.” American Political Science Review 99(3):419–433.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. “Is the ‘Hard Bargaining’ Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Election Directive.” Journal of Common Market Studies 36(4):479–504.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2003. “Institutional Environment and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 36(1–2):97–124.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2005. “The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union.” International Organization 59(4):937–971.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Rice, Thomas. 1992. Forecasting Elections . Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3:183–219.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar and Weibull, Jörgen W.. 1987. “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.” Public Choice 52:273–297.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon and Scheingold, Stuart. 1970. Europe’s Would-Be Polity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lindner, Johannes. 2006. Conflict and Changes in Budgetary Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lynn, Matthew. 2011. Bust: Greece, the Euro, and the Sovereign Debt Crisis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A., and Young, Leslie. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2000. “The Limited Impact of Europe on National Party Systems.” West European Politics 23(4):27–51.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2005. “Democracy Beyond Parties.” UC Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2007. “Political Opposition and the European Union.” Government and Opposition 42(1):1–17.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2008a. “The Challenge to Party Government.” West European Politics 31(1):211–234.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2008b. “Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective.” Acta Politica 43(2):235–253.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2009. “Representative versus Responsible Government.” MPifG Working Paper 09/8.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés. 2008. The Internal Agenda of Mercosur. Independence, Leadership and Institutionalization. In Los Nuevos enfoques de la integracion: mas alla del regionalismo, ed. Jaramillo, Grace. Quito: FLASCO, pp. 115–135.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C.. 1999. Elections and Representation. In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maruhn, Roman and Emmanouilidis, Janis A.. 2005. “Agenda 2007 – The Conflict over the Financial Framework 2007–2013.” Spotlight Europe 01(05):1–11.Google Scholar
Matthijs, Matthias. 2016. “Powerful Rules Governing the Euro: The Perverse Logic of German Ideas.” Journal of European Public Policy 23(3):375–391.Google Scholar
Mattila, Mikko. 2004. “Contested Decisions: Empirical Analysis of Voting in the European Council of Ministers.” European Journal of Political Research 43:29–50.Google Scholar
Mattila, Mikko. 2006. “Fiscal Transfers and Redistribution in the European Union: Do Smaller Member States Get More than their Share?” Journal of European Public Policy 13(1):34–51.Google Scholar
Mattila, Mikko and Lane, Jan-Erik. 2001. “Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting.” European Union Politics 2(1):31–52.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1998. “Revisiting the European Court of Justice.” International Organization 52(1):177–209.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress. The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McIver, Iain. 2008. “The European Union Budget Review.” SPICe Briefing Paper No. 08/50.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1986. “Information, Electoral Equilibria, and the Democratic Ideal.” Journal of Politics 48(4):909–937.Google Scholar
McKibben, Heather. 2013. “The Effects of Structures and Power on State Bargaining Strategies.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2):411–427.Google Scholar
McKibben, Heather and Western, Shaina. 2014. “Levels of Linkage: Across-Agreement versus Within-Agreement Explanations of Consensus Formation among States.” International Studies Quarterly 58(1):44–54.Google Scholar
McCrae, Kenneth D., ed. 1974. Consociational Democracy: Political Accommodation in Segmented Societies. Toronto: McLelland & Steward.Google Scholar
Meiers, Franz-Josef. 2015. Germany’s Role in the Euro Crisis: Berlin’s Quest for a More Perfect Monetary Union. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Meirowitz, Adam. 2005. “Informational Party Primaries and Strategic Ambiguity.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 17(1):107–136.Google Scholar
Meyer, Christoph. 1999. “Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4):617–639.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1):45–56.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. and Judkins, Benjamin. 2004. “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?” International Studies Quarterly 48(1):95–119.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. and Tingley, Dustin. 2011. “Who Supports Global Economic Engagement? The Sources of Preferences in American Foreign Economic Policy.” International Organization 65(1):37–68.Google Scholar
Mink, Mark and de Haan, Jakob. 2005. “Has the Stability and Growth Pact Impeded Political Budget Cycles in the European Union?” CESIFO Working Paper No. 1532.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.” International Organization 45(1):19–57.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Inter-governmentalist Approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4):473– 534.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1994. “Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation.” Center for European Studies Working Paper No. 52.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51(4):513–553.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purposes and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2002. “In Defense of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4):603–624.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2008. “The Myth of Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit.’” Intereconomics 43(6):331–340.Google Scholar
Moyer, Wayne H. and Josling, Tim. 1990. Agricultural Policy Reform Politics and Process in the EC and the USA. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. 2005. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 2000. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mylonas, Yiannis. 2012. “Media and the Economic Crisis of the EU: The ‘Cultiralization’ of a Systemic Crisis and Bild-Zeitung’s Framing of Greece.” tripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation 10(2):646–671.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2002. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context Across Time and Nations.” Electoral Studies 21(3):403–423.Google Scholar
Novak, Stéphanie. 2013. “The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51(6):1091–1107.Google Scholar
Nugent, Neill and Mather, Janet. 2006. The United Kingdom: Critical Friend and Awkward Partner? In The European Union and the Member States, eds. Zeff, Eleanor E. and Pirro, Ellen B.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 129–150.Google Scholar
Olsen, Johan P., Sbragia, Alberta, and Scharpf, Fritz W.. 2002. “Symposium: Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?” Journal of European Public Policy 7(2):310–324.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oltermann, Philip. 2012. “In Berlin.” London Review of Books 34(13):25.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee Ann. 1997. “Agricultural Policy Reform in the European Community.” International Organization 51(1):135–165.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1979. “The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility.” European Journal of Political Research 7(1):1–26.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido. 2002. Political Economics. Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pervez, Fouad. 2015. “Waiting for Election Season.” The Review of International Organizations 10(2):265–303.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas and Schneider, Christina J.. 2007. “Discriminatory EU Membership and the Redistribution of Enlargement Gains.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(4):568–587.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 1997. “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community.” International Organization 51(1):99–134.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004a. “The Chain of Responsiveness.” Journal of Democracy 15(4):91–105.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004b. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7:273–296.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2):391–414.Google Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2006. “Institutions and Coalition Formation: The German Election of 2005.” West European Politics 29(3):540–559.Google Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2010. “Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches.” British Journal of Political Science 40(3):587–611.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability and Representation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Vreeland, James R.. 2000. “The Effect of IMF Programs on Economic Growth.” Journal of Development Economics 62(2):385–421.Google Scholar
Puia, Dana Adriana. 2010. “The Dynamics of Institutional Change and the Case of EU Budgetary Negotiations.” PhD diss. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 44(3):427–460.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. and Bayne, Nicholas. 1984. Hanging Together: The Seven-Power Summits. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rauh, Christian. 2016. A Responsive Technocracy? EU Politicisation and the Consumer Policies of the European Commission. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Ray, Leonard. 2003. “When Parties Matter: The Conditional Influence of Party Positions on Voter Opinions about European Integration.” Journal of Politics 65(4):978–994.Google Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8(1):3–45.Google Scholar
Rickard, Stephanie J. and Caraway, Teri L.. 2014. “International Negotiations in the Shadow of National Elections.” International Organization 68(3): 701–720.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, ed. 2015. European Public Spheres. Politics is Back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rittberger, Berthold. 2007. Building Europe’s Parliament. Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, David. 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2002. “Strength in Numbers? Representation and Redistribution in the European Union.” European Union Politics 3:151–175.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. “The Democracy Deficit and Mass Support for an EU-Wide Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 463–475.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert and Loveless, Matthew. 2010. “Macro Salience: How Economic and Political Contexts Mediate Popular Evaluations of the Democracy Deficit in the European Union.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1029–1045.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert and Whitefield, Stephen. 2012. The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. 2014. “Responsible Party Government in a World of Interdependence.” West European Politics 37(2):253–269.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1961. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: An Operational Formulation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ross, George. 1995. Jacques Delors and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. “Party Types, Organization and Functions.” West European Politics 28(1):5–32.Google Scholar
Sbragia, Alberta M. 1994. From “Nation State” to “Member State”: The Evolution of the European Community. In Europe After Maastricht: American and European Perspectives, ed. Lützeler, P. M.. Providence: Berghahn, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1992. “Europäisches Demokratiedefizit und deutscher Föder-alismus.” Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis 3(3):293–306.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2003. “Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU.” MPIfG Working Paper No. 03/1.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2006. “The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(4):845–864.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. ” The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America .” Hinsdale: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Schild, Joachim. 2008. “How to Shift the EU’s Spending Priorities? The Multiannual Financial Framework 2007–13 in Perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy 15(4):531–549.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.” International Organization 55(1):47–80.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
forthcoming. Europäische Integration. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Hermann, Scholz, Evi, Leim, Iris, and Moschner, Meinhard. 2005. “The Mannheim Eurobarometer Trend File, 1970–2002 [Computer file].” Prepared by Zentralarchiv für Europäische Sozialforschung und Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Hermann and Thomassen, Jacques J. A.. 1999. Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Hermann and Thomassen, Jacques J. A.. 2000. “Dynamic Representation. The Case of European Integration.” European Union Politics 1(3):318–339.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2007. “Enlargement Processes and Distributional Conflicts: The Politics of Discriminatory Membership in the European Union.” Public Choice 132(1–2):85–102.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2009. Conflict, Negotiations, and EU Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2010. “Fighting with One Hand Tied Behind the Back: Political Budget Cycles in the West German States.” Public Choice 142(1):125–150.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2011. “Weak States and Institutionalized Bargaining Power in International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 55(2):331–355.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2013. “Globalizing Electoral Politics: Political Competence and Distributional Bargaining in the European Union.” World Politics 65(3):452–490.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2014. “Domestic Politics and the Widening-Deepening Trade-Off in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 21(5):699–712.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. 2017. “The Sources of Government Accountability in the European Union. Evidence From a Conjoint Experiment in Germany.” Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. and Slantchev, Branislav L.. 2017. “The Domestic Politics of International Cooperation. Germany and the European Debt Crisis.” International Organization 72(1):1–31.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J., Swalve, Tilko, and Troeger, Vera E.. 2016. “Strategic Budgeteering.” Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. and Tobin, Jennifer L.. 2013. “Interest Coalitions and Multilateral Aid Allocation in the European Union.” International Studies Quarterly 57(1):103–114.Google Scholar
Schneider, Christina J. and Urpelainen, Johannes. 2014. “Partisan Heterogeneity and International Cooperation: The Case of the European Development Fund.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58(1):120–142.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerald and Baltz, Konstantin. 2004. The Power of Specialization: How Interest Groups Influence EU Legislation. In The Role of Organized Interest Groups in Policy-Making, eds. Di Gioacchino, Debora, Ginebri, Sergio, and Sabani, Laura. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 253–284.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerald and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1994. “The Change of Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited Information Model of European Integration.” International Organization 48(4):633–662.Google Scholar
Schoen, Harald. 2008. “Turkey’s Bid for EU Membership, Contrasting Views of Public Opinion, and Vote Choice: Evidence from the 2005 German Federal Election.” Electoral Studies 27(2):344–355.Google Scholar
Schulz, Heiner and König, Thomas. 2000. “Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union.” American Journal of Political Science 44(4):653–666.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Michael. 2000. “The Politics of Codecision.” Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2):325–342.Google Scholar
Shapley, Lloyd S. and Shubik, Martin. 1954. “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System.” American Political Science Review 48:787–792.Google Scholar
Shi, Min and Svensson, Jakob. 2006. “Political Budget Cycles: Do they Differ Across Countries and Why?” Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9): 1367–1389.Google Scholar
Slapin, Jonathan B. 2008. “Bargaining Power at Europe’s Intergovernmental Conferences: Testing Institutional and Intergovernmental Theories.” International Organization 62(1):131–162.Google Scholar
Smith, Mitchell P. 1997. The Commission Made Me Do It: The European Commission as a Strategic Asset in Domestic Politics. In At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission, ed. Nugent, Neill. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd, 167–186.Google Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae and Williams, Christopher J.. 2017. “It Takes Two: How Eurosceptic Public Opinion and Party Divisions Influence Party Positions.” West European Politics 40(4):741–762.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2004. “Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining.” International Organization 58(3):667–703.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2005. “Does Transparency Make a Difference? The Example of the European Council of Ministers.” Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–565.Google Scholar
Stokman, Frans N. and Thomson, Robert. 2004. “Winners and Losers in the European Union.” European Union Politics 5(1):5–23.Google Scholar
Strong, James. 2017. Public Opinion, Legitimacy and Tony Blair’s War in Iraq. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2006. “Lies, Defection, and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” American Journal of Political Science 50(4):909–925.Google Scholar
Szemlér, Tamás. 2006. “EU Budget Milestones: From Fundamental Systemic Reforms to Organised Chaos.” Papeles del Este 11:1–20.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. “Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?” West European Politics 25(1):23–46.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2006. Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2008. “Bargaining Power in the European Council.” Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3):685–708.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas and Johansson, Karl Magnus. 2008. “Party Politics in the European Council.” Journal of European Public Policy 15(8):1222–1242.Google Scholar
Tausanovitch, Chris and Warshaw, Christopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review 108(3):605–641.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques J. A. 1994. Empirical Research into Political Representation. In Elections at Home and Abroad, eds. Kent Jennings, M. and Mann, T. E.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 237–264.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques J. A. 1999. Political Communication Between Political Elites and Mass Publics: The Role of Belief Systems. In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, eds. Miller, Warren E., Pierce, Roy, Thomassen, Jacques J. A., Herrera, Richard, Holmberg, Sören, Esaisson, Peter, and Webels, Bernhard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–58.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques J. A. and Schmitt, Hermann. 1997. “Policy Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 32(2):165–184.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert. 2007. “National Actors in International Organizations: The Case of the European Commission.” Comparative Political Studies 41(2):169–192.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert. 2011. Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Legislative Decision-Making Before and After Enlargement . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert, Arregui, Javier, Leuffen, Dirk, Costello, Rory, Cross, James, Hertz, Robin, and Jensen, Thomas. 2012. “A New Dataset on Decision-making in the European Union Before and After the 2004 and 2007 Enlargements (DEUII).” Journal of European Public Policy 19(4):604–622.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert and Stokman, Frans N.. 2006. Research Design: Measuring Actors’ Positions, Saliences and Capabilities. In The European Union Decides, eds. Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, Christopher H., and König, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–53.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, Christopher H., and König, Thomas, eds. 2006. The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tillman, Erik R. 2004. “The European Union at the Ballot Box? European Integration and Voting Behavior in the New Member States.” Comparative Political Studies 37(5):590–610.Google Scholar
Tillman, Erik R. 2012. “Support for the Euro, Political Knowledge, and Voting Behavior in the 2001 and 2005 UK General Elections.” European Union Politics 13(3): 367–389.Google Scholar
Tomz, Mike and Van Houweling, Robert. 2008. “Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice.” American Political Science Review 102(3):303–318.Google Scholar
Toshkov, Dimiter. 2015. “Public Opinion and Policy Output in the European Union: A Lost Relationship.” European Union Politics 12(2):169–191.Google Scholar
Traber, Denise, Schoonvelde, Martijn, Schumacher, Gijs, Dahiya, Tanushree, and de Vries, Erik. 2016. “Issue Avoidance and Blame Attribution in Leader Speeches During the Economic Crisis in Europe.” Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Treib, Oliver. 2014. “The Voter Says No, but Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Elections.” Journal of European Public Policy 21(10):1541–1554.Google Scholar
Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2005. Europa in den Medien: Die Europäische Integration im Spiegel Nationaler Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1994. “The Power of the European Parliament as Conditional Agenda Setter.” American Political Science Review 88(1):128–142.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tzogopoulos, George. 2013. The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van der Brug, Wouter and van der Eijk, Cees. 2007. European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
van der Brug, Wouter, Van der Eijk, Cees, and Franklin, Mark. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Cees and Franklin, Mark N.. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Cees and Franklin, Mark N.. 2004. Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe. In European Integration and Political Conflict, ed. Marks, Gary and Steenbergen, Marco. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Cees, Franklin, Mark N., and Marsh, Michael. 1996. “What Voters Teach Us About Europe-Wide Elections: What Europe-Wide Elections Teach Us About Voters.” Electoral Studies 15(2):149–166.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulou, Sofia, Halikiopoulou, Daphne, and Exadaktylos, Theofanis. 2014. “Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2):388–402.Google Scholar
Vaubel, Roland. 1986. “A Public Choice Approach to International Organization.” Public Choice 51(1):39–57.Google Scholar
von Hagen, Jürgen. 2003. “Fiscal Discipline and Growth in Euroland. Experiences with the Stability and Growth Pact.” ZEI Working Paper No. B062003.Google Scholar
Vreeland, James R. 1999. “The IMF: Lender of Last Resort or Scapegoat?” Prepared for the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, April 15–17, 1999.Google Scholar
Warntjen, Andreas, Hix, Simon, and Crombez, Christophe. 2008. “The Party Political Make-Up of the EU Legislative Bodies.” Journal of European Public Policy 15(8):1243–1253.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6(4):371–398.Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher J. 2016a. “Issuing Reasoned Opinions: The Effect of Public Attitudes Towards the European Union on the Usage of the ‘Early Warning System.’” European Union Politics 17(3):504–521.Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher J. 2016b. “Responding through Transposition: Public Euroskepticism and European Policy Implementation.” European Political Science Review 10(1):51–70.Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher J. and Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2015. “Differentiated Party Response: The Effect of Euroskeptic Public Opinion on Party Positions.” European Union Politics 16(2):176–193.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1989. “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results.” The Journal of Political Economy 97(6):1395–1424.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as a Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):981–1000.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher and Soroka, Stuart N.. 2011. “Federalism and Public Responsiveness to Policy.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(1):31–52.Google Scholar
Wratil, Christopher. 2017. “Democratic Responsiveness in the European Union: The Case of the Council.” European Union Politics 19(1): 52–74.Google Scholar
Zaum, Dominik. 2013. Legitimating International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Christina, Schneider, Gerald, and Dobbins, Michael. 2005. “The Contested Council: Conflict Dimensions of an Intergovernmental EU Institution.” Political Studies 53(2):403–422.Google Scholar
Zweifel, Thomas D. 2006. International Organizations and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×