Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:31:51.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Noise and the Values of News

from Part II - Journalism in Times of Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Stephanie Craft  and
Morten Stinus Kristensen
Edited by
Matthew Powers  and
Adrienne Russell
Matthew Powers
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Adrienne Russell
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

This chapter poses the question of whether news values can serve a contemporary media environment that is chaotic, crowded and noisy. Drawing on examples from the 2016 American presidential campaign, Stephanie Craft and Morten Stinus Kristensen argue that norms of impact, conflict and novelty are increasingly incompatible with a media environment that demands and rewards sharing news incrementally and repeatedly, treating every new piece of information with breaking news intensity. These mismatched values are further fueled by commercial pressures that favor such values, as well as by bad faith actors who seek to game these values to steer coverage in ways that promote their causes or muddy public understanding of core issues. Rather than advocating for a return to a romanticized simpler time of journalistic gatekeeping power and professional authority over news, Craft and Kristensen argue that journalists and journalism educators need to rethink some of the basic premises of journalistic norms and practices, with the aim of developing news values better able to provide publics with the information necessary for political life to function.

Keywords

news valuesnews noisejournalismonline newsjournalism education
Type
Chapter
Information
Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies , pp. 78 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

boyd, danah (2018). “Media Manipulation, Strategic Amplification, and Responsible Journalism.” [blog] Data & Society Research Institute, September14. https://points.datasociety.net/media-manipulation-strategic-amplification-and-responsible-journalism-95f4d611f462Google Scholar
Carey, James (1989). “A Cultural Approach to Communication.” In Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society (pp. 13–36). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Carlson, Matt (2018). “Automating Judgment? Algorithmic Judgment, News Knowledge, and Journalistic Professionalism.” New Media & Society, 20(5), 1755–1772.Google Scholar
Fidler, Roger (1992, October). “What Are We So Afraid Of?” American Journalism Review, https://ajrarchive.org/article.asp?id=1324Google Scholar
Harcup, Tony and O’Neill, Deirdre (2017). “What Is News? News Values Revisited (Again).” Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Tracy (2000, August). “Defining the Blurry Line between Commerce and Content.” Columbia Journalism Review, 39(2), 31–32.Google Scholar
Phillips, Angela (2012). “Sociability, Speed and Quality in the Changing News Environment.” Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 669–679.Google Scholar
Phillips, Whitney (2018, May 22). The Oxygen of Amplification: Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators. New York: Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/output/oxygen-of-amplification/Google Scholar
Parks, Perry (2018). “Textbook News Values: Stable Concepts, Changing Choices.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 1–27.Google Scholar
Reese, Cleghorn (1994, April). “Highways and the Nature of Journalism.” American Journalism Review, http://ajrarchive.org/Article.asp?id=1141Google Scholar
Singer, Jane B. (2018). “Transmission Creep.” Journalism Studies, 19(2), 209–226.Google Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper, Karlsson, Michael, and Hopmann, David Nicolas (2012). “Determinants of News Content.” Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 718–728.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×