Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:47:11.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2023

Jerry Toner
Jerry Toner
Affiliation:
Churchill College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Risk in the Roman World , pp. 134 - 143
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrete, G. S., Floods of the Tiber in Ancient Rome, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C., and Smith, P., ‘Social science and salvation: risk society as a mythic discourse’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25 (1996), 251–62.Google Scholar
Anderson, H. E. III, ‘Risk, shipping, and Roman law’, Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 34 (2009), 183–210.Google Scholar
Andreau, J., Banking and Business in the Roman World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Beard, M., ‘Risk and the humanities: alea iacta est’, in Skinns, L., Scott, M. and Cox, T. (eds), Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 85–108.Google Scholar
Beck, M., and Kewell, B., Risk: A Study of Its Origins, History and Politics, New Jersey: World Scientific, 2014.Google Scholar
Beck, U., ‘From industrial society to the Risk Society: questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment’, Theory, Culture and Society, 9 (1992), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986, translated as Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter, London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
Beerden, K., Worlds Full of Signs: Ancient Greek Divination in Context, Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. (ed.), Innovative Thinking in Risk, Crisis and Disaster Management, Farnham: Gower, 2012.Google Scholar
Bernstein, P. L., Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk, New York: John Wiley, 1996.Google Scholar
Betz, H. D. (ed.), The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation, Including the Demotic Spells, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Billeter, G., Geschichte des Zinsfusses im griechisch-römischen Altertum bis auf Justinian, Leipzig: Teubner, 1898.Google Scholar
Blastland, M., and Spiegelhalter, D., The Norm Chronicles: Stories and Numbers about Danger, London: Profile, 2013.Google Scholar
Boholm, A., ‘Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research’, Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1998), 135–63.Google Scholar
Bowes, K. (ed.), The Roman Peasant Project 2009–2014: Excavating the Roman Rural Poor, University museum monograph, 154, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2020.Google Scholar
Boyne, R., Risk, London: Open University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R., Discovering the Roman Family: Studies in Roman Social History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Breakwell, G. M., The Psychology of Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., Poverty and Leadership in the Later Roman Empire, London and Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2002.Google Scholar
Brown, R., ‘History versus Hacking on probability’, History of European Ideas, 8 (1987), 655–73.Google Scholar
Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Burgess, A., Alemanno, A. and Zinn, J. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies, London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Candy, P., and Mataix Ferrándiz, E. (eds), Roman Law and Maritime Commerce, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Carrithers, M., Why Humans Have Cultures: Explaining Anthropology and Social Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Casson, L., Travel in the Ancient World, London: Allen & Unwin, 1974.Google Scholar
Castel, R., ‘From dangerousness to risk’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 281–98.Google Scholar
Cheyette, F. L., ‘The disappearance of the ancient landscape and the climate anomaly of the early Middle Ages: a question to be pursued’, Early Medieval Europe, 16 (2008), 127–65.Google Scholar
The Chronicle of Pseudo-Joshua the Stylite, trans. Trombley, F. R. and Watt, J. W., Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
The Chronicle of Zuqnīn, parts III and IV: AD 488–775, trans. Harrak, A., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1999.Google Scholar
Ciecka, J. E., ‘Ulpian’s Table and the value of life annuities and usufructs’, Journal of Legal Economics, 19 (2012), 7–15.Google Scholar
Closs, V. M., While Rome Burned: Fire, Leadership, and Urban Disaster in the Roman Cultural Imagination, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Daly, L. W. (ed.), Aesop without Morals: The Famous Fables, and a Life of Aesop, New York: T. Yoseloff, 1961.Google Scholar
David, F. N., ‘Dicing and gaming (a note on the history of probability)’, Biometrika, 42 (1955), 1–15.Google Scholar
David, F. N., Games, Gods and Gambling: The Origins and History of Probability and Statistical Ideas from the Earliest Times to the Newtonian Era, London: C. Griffin, 1962.Google Scholar
De Romanis, F., The Indo-Roman Pepper Trade and the Muziris Papyrus, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M., ‘Ancient Greek and Roman maritime loans’, in Edey, H. C. and Yamey, B. S. (eds), Debits, Credits, Finance and Profits, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1974, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar
De Vries, T., and Zwalve, W. J., ‘Roman actuarial science and Ulpian’s life expectancy table’, in de Ligt, L., Hemelrijk, E. A and Singor, H. W. (eds), Roman Rule and Civic Life: Local and Regional Perspectives, Leiden: Brill, 2004, pp. 275–97.Google Scholar
Dean, M., ‘Risk, calculable and incalculable’, Soziale Welt – Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 49 (1998), 25–42.Google Scholar
Deeg, P., Der Kaiser und die Katastrophe: Untersuchungen zum politischen Umgang mit Umweltkatastrophen im Prinzipat (31 v. Chr. bis 192 n. Chr.), Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2019.Google Scholar
Denney, D., Risk and Society, London: Sage, 2005.Google Scholar
Dorigo, W., Late Roman Painting: A Study of Pictorial Records, 30 BC–AD 500, trans. J. Cleugh and J. Warrington, London: Dent, 1971.Google Scholar
Dörner, D., The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations, trans. R. and R. Kimber, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., ‘Risk as a forensic resource: from “chance” to “danger”’, Daedalus, 119 (1990), 1–16.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A., Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Doyle, A., and Ericson, D., Uncertain Business: Risk, Insurance, and the Limits of Knowledge, Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Doyle, A., and Ericson, D. (eds), Risk and Morality, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, P. J., Letting and Hiring in Roman Legal Thought 27BCE–284CE, Leiden: Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Plessis, P. J., Ando, C. and Tuori, K. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R., Money and Government in the Roman Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ehmig, U., ‘Antiker Umgang mit Wahrscheinlichem: einige Beobachtungen in den dokumentarischen Quellen’, Eirene, 49 (2013), 90–116.Google Scholar
Ehmig, U., ‘Subjektive und faktische Risiken.Votivgründe und Todesursachen in lateinischen Inschriften als Beispiele für Nachrichtenauswahl in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, Chiron, 43 (2013), 127–98.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E., Luck, Fate, and Fortune, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidinow, E., Oracles, Curses, and Risk among the Ancient Greeks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., and Masters, J. (eds), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation, London: Duckworth, 1994.Google Scholar
Enarson, E., and Dhar Chakrabarti, P. G., Women, Gender and Disaster: Global Issues and Initiatives, London: Sage, 2009.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, P., Hunger and the Sword: Warfare and Food Supply in Roman Republican Wars (264–30 B.C.), Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1998.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, P. (ed.), A Companion to the Roman Army, Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P., Feduzi, A. and Runde, J., ‘Unknowns, Black Swans and the risk/uncertainty distinction’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41 (2017), 1279–1302.Google Scholar
Foster, G. M., ‘Peasant society and the image of limited good’, American Anthropologist, 67 (1965), 293–315.Google Scholar
Fothergill, A., ‘Gender, risk, and disaster’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 14 (1996), 33–56.Google Scholar
Franklin, J., The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (ed.), The Politics of Risk Society, Maldon, MA: Polity, 1998.Google Scholar
Freedgood, E., Victorian Writing about Risk: Imagining a Safe England in a Dangerous World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W., ‘Demography’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P. and Rathbone, D. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History XI: The High Empire, A.D. 70–192, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 787–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frier, B. W., ‘Roman life expectancy: Ulpian’s evidence’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology , 86 (1982), 213–51.Google Scholar
Gager, J. G. (ed.), Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Gallant, T. W., Risk and Survival in Ancient Greece: Reconstructing the Rural Domestic Economy, Cambridge: Polity, 1991.Google Scholar
Garland, D., ‘The rise of risk’, in Doyle, A. and Ericson, D. (eds), Risk and Morality, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003, pp. 48–86.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P., Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity, 1991.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., Runaway World: How Globalisation Is Reshaping Our Lives, London: Profile, 1999.Google Scholar
Graf, F., ‘Rolling the dice for an answer’, in Johnston, S. I. and Struck, P. T. (eds), Mantikê: Studies in Ancient Divination, Leiden: Brill, 2005, pp. 51–97.Google Scholar
Green, C. M. C., Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Green, M. H., ‘When Numbers Don’t Count: Changing Perspectives on the Justinianic plague’, Eidolon, 18 (2019). https://eidolon.pub/when-numbers-dont-count-56a2b3c3d07.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., ‘A statistical Mare’s Nest?’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 103 (1940), 246–8.Google Scholar
Grey, C., Constructing Communities in the Late Roman Countryside, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Grey, C. ‘Risk and vulnerability on the Campanian plain: the Vesuvius eruption of A.D. 472’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 51 (2020), 1–37.Google Scholar
Haberman, S., and Sibbett, T. A. (eds), History of Actuarial Science, vol. 1, London: William Pickering, 1995.Google Scholar
Hacking, I., The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hacking, I., ‘Risk and dirt’, in Doyle, A. and Ericson, D. (eds), Risk and Morality, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003, pp. 22–47.Google Scholar
Hacking, I., The Taming of Chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hald, A., A History of Probability and Statistics and Their Applications before 1750, Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley, 2003.Google Scholar
Haldon, J., et al., ‘Plagues, climate change, and the end of an empire: a response to Kyle Harper’s The Fate of Rome (1): Climate’, History Compass, 16 (2018). https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hic3.12508.Google Scholar
Haldon, J., et al., ‘Plagues, climate change, and the end of an empire: a response to Kyle Harper’s The Fate of Rome (2): plagues and a crisis of empire’, History Compass, 16 (2018). https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hic3.12506.Google Scholar
Haldon, J., et al., ‘Plagues, climate change, and the end of an empire: a response to Kyle Harper’s The Fate of Rome (3): disease, agency and collapse’, History Compass, 16 (2018). https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hic3.12507.Google Scholar
Halstead, P., and O’Shea, J., Bad Year Economics: Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (trans) and Thonemann, P. (introduction), Artemidorus: The Interpretation of Dreams, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. (ed.), Anthology of Ancient Greek Popular Literature, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O., The Ethics of Risk: Ethical Analysis in an Uncertain World, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Harper, K., The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Harper, K., ‘Integrating the natural sciences and Roman History: challenges and prospects’, History Compass, 16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12520.Google Scholar
Harper, K., Plagues upon the Earth: Disease and the Course of Human History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Homer, S., and Sylla, R., A History of Interest Rates, 3rd edition, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K., Conquerors and Slaves, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K, ‘On the probable age structure of the Roman population’, Population Studies, 20 (1966), 245–64.Google Scholar
Horden, P., and Purcell, N., The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History, Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N., The Culture of the Roman Plebs, London: Duckworth, 2003.Google Scholar
Horsley, G. H. R., and Mitchell, S. (eds), The Inscriptions of Central Pisidia, Bonn: Habelt, 2000.Google Scholar
Jakab, É., ‘Risikomanagement bei den Naukleroi’, in Benke, N. and Meissel, F.-S. (eds), Antike – Recht – Geschichte, Frankfurt: P. Lang, 2009, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Jakab, É., Risikomanagement beim Weinkauf: Periculum und Praxis im Imperium Romanum, Munich: C. H. Beck, 2009.Google Scholar
Joffe, H., Risk and ‘the Other’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Johns, L. S. et al., The Effects of Nuclear War, Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1979.Google Scholar
Johnston, D., Roman Law in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Johnston, D., The Roman Law of Trusts, Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar
Johnston, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingshirn, W., ‘Christian divination in late Roman Gaul: the Sortes Sangallenses’, in Johnston, S. I. and Struck, P. T. (eds), Mantikê: Studies in Ancient Divination, Leiden: Brill, 2005, pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S., and Golding, D. (eds), Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992.Google Scholar
Krüger, L. (ed.), The Probabilistic Revolution, 2 vols, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Laes, C., ‘Children and accidents in Roman Antiquity’, Ancient Society, 34 (2004), 153–70.Google Scholar
Le Bohec, Y. (ed.), The Encylcopedia of the Roman Army, 3 vols, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoux, D., Astronomy, Weather, and Calendars in the Ancient World: Parapegmata and Related Texts in Classical and Near-Eastern societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E., Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World, Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., and Brown, P., Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Little, L. K., ‘Plague historians in lab coats’, Past and Present, 213 (2011), 267–90.Google Scholar
Little, L. K., (ed.), Plague and the End of Antiquity: The Pandemic of 541–750, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Living with Risk: The British Medical Association Guide, Chichester: Wiley, 1987.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Risk: A Sociological Theory, trans. R. Barrett, New York: de Gruyter, 1993.Google Scholar
Lupton, D., Risk, 2nd edition, Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (ed.), Risk and Socio-cultural Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lyng, S. (ed.), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk Taking, London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
MacCormack, G., ‘Dolus, culpa, custodia and diligentia – criteria of liability or content of obligation’, Index, 22 (1996), 189–209.Google Scholar
MacCormack, G., ‘Further on periculum’, BIDR, 1979 (1982), 11–40.Google Scholar
MacCormack, G. ‘Periculum’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung, 96 (1979), 129–72.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R., Roman Social Relations, 50 B.C. to A.D. 284, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Macve, R. H., ‘Some glosses on “Greek and Roman accounting”’, History of Political Thought, 6 (1985), 233–64.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. M., ‘Portfolio selection’, Journal of Finance, 7 (1952), 77–91.Google Scholar
McCambley, C., ‘Against those who practice usury by Gregory of Nyssa’, Greek Orthodox Theological Review, 36 (1991), 287–302.Google Scholar
McCormick, M., ‘Climates of history, histories of climate: from history to archaeoscience’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 50 (2019), 3–30.Google Scholar
Meier, M. ‘The “Justinianic plague”: an “inconsequential pandemic”? A reply’, Medizinhistorisches Journal, 55 (2020), 172–99.Google Scholar
Millett, P., ‘Maritime loans and the structure of credit in fourth-century Athens’, in Garnsey, P., Hopkins, K. and Whittaker, C. R. (eds), Trade in the Ancient Economy, London: Chatto & Windus, 1983, pp. 36–52.Google Scholar
Mordechai, L., and Eisenberg, M., ‘Rejecting catastrophe: the case of the Justinianic plague’, Past & Present, 244 (2019), 3–50.Google Scholar
Morgan, T., Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Morley, N., ‘Decadence as a theory of history’, New Literary History, 35 (2004), 573–85.Google Scholar
Morley, N., Trade in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Muchembled, R., Popular Culture and Elite Culture in France, 1400–1750, trans. L. Cochrane, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Nacol, E. C., An Age of Risk: Politics and Economy in Early Modern Britain, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Newbold, R. F., ‘The reporting of earthquakes, fires and floods by ancient historians’, Proceedings of the African Classical Association, 16 (1982), 28–36.Google Scholar
O’Malley, P., Crime and Risk, Los Angeles: Sage, 2010.Google Scholar
O’Malley, P., Risk, Uncertainty and Government, London: GlassHouse, 2004.Google Scholar
O’Malley, P., ‘The uncertain promise of risk’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37 (2004), 323–42.Google Scholar
Obelkevich, J., ‘Proverbs and social history’, in Burke, P. and Porter, R. (eds), The Social History of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 43–72.Google Scholar
Oleson, J. P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Parkin, A. R., Poverty in the Early Roman Empire: Ancient and Modern Conceptions and Constructs, unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge University, 2001.Google Scholar
Parkin, A. R., ‘“You do him no service”: an exploration of pagan almsgiving’, in Atkins, M. and Osborne, R. (eds), Poverty in the Roman World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 60–82.Google Scholar
Parkin, T. G., Demography and Roman Society, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G. (eds), Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, 2 vols, London: C. Griffin, 1970.Google Scholar
Peddie, J., The Roman War Machine, Stroud: Alan Sutton,1994.Google Scholar
Pflaumer, P., ‘Estimations of the Roman life expectancy using Ulpian’s Table’, JSM Proceedings, Social Statistics Section, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 2666–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-16456.Google Scholar
Poitras, G., The Early History of Financial Economics, 1478–1776, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.Google Scholar
Price, J. J., and Berthelot, K. (eds), The Future of Rome: Roman, Greek, Jewish and Christian Visions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Price, S. R., ‘The future of dreams: from Freud to Artemidorus’, Past & Present, 113 (1986), 3–37.Google Scholar
Purcell, N., ‘Literate games: Roman urban society and the game of alea’, Past & Present, 147 (1995), 3–37.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. W., ‘The financing of maritime commerce in the Roman empire, (I–II AD)’, in Lo Cascio, E. (ed.), Credito e moneta nel mondo romano, Bari, Italy: Edipuglia, 2003, pp. 197–229.Google Scholar
Renn, O., ‘Concepts of risk: a classification’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds), Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992, pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Rigakos, G., and Law, A., ‘Risk, realism and the politics of resistance’, Critical Sociology, 35 (2009), 79–103.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M., Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E. L. and Dynes, R. R. (eds), Handbook of Disaster Research, New York: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
Ronin, M., ‘The perception of natural risks of earthquakes and floods in the Roman world’, Historia, 71 (2022), 362–89.Google Scholar
Rosa, E. A., ‘Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk’, Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1998), 15–44.Google Scholar
Roth, J. P., The Logistics of the Roman Army at War (264 B.C.–A.D. 235), Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Rougé, J., ‘Prêt et société maritimes dans le monde romain’, in D’Arms, J. H. and Kopff, E. C. (eds), The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome, Rome: American Academy in Rome, 1980, pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
Rüpke, R., Religion of the Romans, trans. R. Gordon, Cambridge: Polity, 2007.Google Scholar
Sabin, P. et al. (eds), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare, 2 vols, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sallares, R., The Ecology of the Ancient Greek World, London: Duckworth, 1991.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S., ‘On the possible and probable in Ancient Greece’, Osiris, 12 (1956), 35–48.Google Scholar
Sandberg, A. and Bostrom, N., Global Catastrophic Risks Survey, Technical Report #2008-1, Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University, 2008.Google Scholar
Sarris, P., ‘Climate and disease’, in Hermans, E. (ed.), A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages, Leeds: Arc Humanities Press, 2020, pp. 511–38.Google Scholar
Sarris, P., ‘New approaches to the plague of Justinian’, Past and Present, 254 (2022), 315–46.Google Scholar
Savage, S. L., The Flaw of Averages: Why We Underestimate Risk in the Face of Uncertainty, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2009.Google Scholar
Scheid, J., An Introduction to Roman Religion, trans. J. Lloyd, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., Death on the Nile: Disease and the Demography of Roman Egypt, Mnemosyne Supplements, Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., ‘Libitina’s bitter gains: seasonal mortality and endemic disease in the ancient city of Rome’, Ancient Society, 25 (1994), 151–75.Google Scholar
Schulz, F., Classical Roman Law, Oxford: Clarendon, 1951.Google Scholar
Sessa, K., ‘The new environmental Fall of Rome: a methodological consideration’, Journal of Late Antiquity, 12 (2019), 211–55.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D., ‘Did the Romans have a future?’, Journal of Roman Studies, 109 (2019), 1–26.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D., ‘Our daily bread’, Social History of Medicine, 2 (1989), 205–13.Google Scholar
Sheynin, O. B., ‘On the prehistory of the theory of probability’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 12 (1974), 97–141.Google Scholar
Silva, P. G. et al., ‘Archaeoseismic record at the ancient Roman city of Baelo Claudia (Cádiz, south Spain)’, Tectonophysics, 408 (2005), 129–46.Google Scholar
Skinns, L., Scott, M. and Cox, T. (eds), Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., ‘Perception of risk’, Science, 236 (1987), 280–5.Google Scholar
Sonnabend, H., Naturkatastrophen in der Antike: Wahrnehmung, Deutung, Management, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1999.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D., ‘Quantifying uncertainty’, in Skinns, L., Scott, M. and Cox, T. (eds), Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Taleb, N. N., The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, London: Allen Lane, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, R., Roman Builders: A Study in Architectural Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P., ‘The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century’, Past & Present, 50 (1971), 76–136.Google Scholar
Toner, J., ‘Decadence in ancient Rome’, in Desmarais, J. and Weir, D. (eds), Decadence and Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
Toner, J., Infamy: The Crimes of Ancient Rome, London: Profile, 2019.Google Scholar
Toner, J., ‘The intellectual life of the Roman non-elite’, in Grig, L. (ed.), Popular Culture in the Ancient World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 167–88.Google Scholar
Toner, J., Leisure and Ancient Rome, Cambridge: Polity, 1995.Google Scholar
Toner, J., Popular Culture in Ancient Rome, Cambridge: Polity, 2009.Google Scholar
Toner, J., Roman Disasters, Cambridge: Polity, 2013.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S., ‘Lower class women in the Roman economy’, Florilegium, 1 (1979), 65–86.Google Scholar
Tulloch, J., and Lupton, D., Risk and Everyday Life, London: Sage, 2003.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S., Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology, Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A., ‘The senses in the market-place: the luxury market and eastern trade in imperial Rome’, in Toner, J. (ed.), A Cultural History of the Senses in Antiquity, London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 69–89.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. J., The Great Fire of Rome: Life and Death in the Ancient City, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Watson, A., The Spirit of Roman Law, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1995.Google Scholar
White, R. J., The Interpretation of Dreams = Oneirocritica by Artemidorus, Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A., and Dake, K., ‘Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?’, Daedalus, 119 (1990), 41–60.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I., Risk, Vulnerability and Everyday Life, London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Wynne, B., ‘May the sheep safely graze?’, in Lash, S., Szerszinski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds), Risk, Environment and Modernity, London: Sage, 1996, pp. 44–83.Google Scholar
Yaron, R., ‘Remarks on consensual sale (with special attention to periculum emptoris)’, Roman Legal Tradition, 59 (2004), 59–76.Google Scholar
Yaron, R., ‘Sale of wine’, in Daube, D. (ed.), Studies in the Roman Law of Sale, Oxford: Clarendon, 1959, pp. 71–7.Google Scholar
Zanda, E., Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Zinn, J. O. (ed.), Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Zola, I. K., ‘Observations on gambling in a lower-class setting’, Social Problems, 10 (1963), 353–61.Google Scholar
Zulaika, J., Terranova: The Ethos and Luck of Deep-Sea Fishermen, Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1981.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jerry Toner, Churchill College, Cambridge
  • Book: Risk in the Roman World
  • Online publication: 16 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592734.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jerry Toner, Churchill College, Cambridge
  • Book: Risk in the Roman World
  • Online publication: 16 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592734.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jerry Toner, Churchill College, Cambridge
  • Book: Risk in the Roman World
  • Online publication: 16 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592734.008
Available formats
×