Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:09:20.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Frugality, Building, and Heirlooms in an Age of Social Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2020

By
John R. Patterson
Edited by
Ingo Gildenhard  and
Cristiano Viglietti
Ingo Gildenhard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Cristiano Viglietti
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Siena
Get access

Summary

The chapter explores the styles of self-promotion available to elite Romans, ranging from frugal self-restraint and material sobriety to prodigial acts of civic generosity, and analyses the debates over and constraints on luxury and encouragement of frugality with respect to building projects and expensive heirlooms, not least those made of silver, from the late republic to the early imperial period. The chronologically and thematically wide-ranging investigation foregrounds in particular the enhanced social mobility that civil war and autocracy introduced into Roman society, including a discussion of why provincial newcomers such as Tacitus and Pliny the Younger affected particular enthusiasm for frugality and disapproved of luxury, as a way of positioning themselves as new arrivals within the ruling class of Rome.

Keywords

buildingscivil warheirloomsnewcomersluxuryPliny the Youngersilverwaresocial mobilityTacitus
Type
Chapter
Information
Roman Frugality
Modes of Moderation from the Archaic Age to the Early Empire and Beyond
 , pp. 347 - 371
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamo Muscettola, S. (1996) ‘Un rilievo deliaco da Pietrelcina: sulle tracce di Vedio Pollione’, La Parola del Passato 51: 118–31.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1995) ‘Bricht der Schweigsame sein Schweigen? Eine Grabinschrift aus Rom’, MDAIR 102: 251–68.Google Scholar
Allen, W. (1958) ‘Imperial mementoes in Suetonius’, CB 35.1: 1–4.Google Scholar
Allison, P. (2004) Pompeian Households: An Analysis of Material Culture. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Andreski, S. (1998) Military Organisation and Society, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (1994) The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (2000) ‘The life and death of Cornelius Tacitus’, Historia 49: 230–47.Google Scholar
Boschung, D. (1986) ‘Überlegungen zum Liciniergrab’, JDAI 101: 257–87.Google Scholar
Boudreau Flory, M. (1984) ‘Sic exempla parantur: Livia’s shrine to Concordia and the Porticus Liviae’, Historia 33: 309–30.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1951) The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1. New York.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1971) Italian Manpower 225 BC–AD 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Carandini, A. (1988) Schiavi in Italia. Gli strumenti pensanti dei Romani fra tarda Repubblica e medio Impero. Rome.Google Scholar
Carandini, A., Bruno, D. and Fraioli, F. (2010) Le case del potere nell’antica Roma. Bari.Google Scholar
Carlsen, J. (2006) The Rise and Fall of a Roman Noble Family: The Domitii Ahenobarbi 196 BC–AD 68. Odense.Google Scholar
Clemente, G. (1981) ‘Le leggi sul lusso e la società romana tra III e II secolo a.C.’, in Società romana e produzione schiavistica, vol. 3. Modelli etici, diritto e transformazioni sociali, eds. Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A.. Bari: 1–14.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (ed.) (1996) Roman Statutes. London.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1955) Consilium principis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. (1984) ‘Upper-class attitudes towards viri municipales and their towns in the early Roman empire’, Athenaeum 62: 440–67.Google Scholar
De Carolis, E. (2007) Il mobile a Pompei ed Ercolano: letti, tavoli, sedie e armadi. Rome.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1997) ‘Cum dignitate otium: senatorial domus in imperial Rome’, SCI 16: 162–90.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Emanuele, D. (1989) ‘Aes Corinthium: fact, fiction, and fake’, Phoenix 43: 347–57.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (ed.) (2013) Cicero’s Pro L. Murena oratio. New York.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2006) The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1988) Del buon uso della ricchezza: saggi di storia economica e sociale del mondo antico. Milan.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2007) Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giovagnoli, M. (2012a) ‘Coppetta per l’elezione di Catone’, in Terme di Diocleziano: la collezione epigrafica, eds. Friggeri, R., Granino Cecere, M. G. and Gregori, G. L.. Milan: 203.Google Scholar
Giovagnoli, M. (2012b) ‘Coppetta per l’elezione di Catilina’, in Terme di Diocleziano: la collezione epigrafica, eds. Friggeri, R., Granino Cecere, M. G. and Gregori, G. L.. Milan: 204.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1976) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Guilhembet, J.-P. (2001) ‘Les résidences aristocratiques de Rome, du milieu du Ier siècle avant n.è. à la fin des Antonins’, in La ville de Rome sous le haut-empire: nouvelles connaissances, nouvelles reflexions (= Pallas 2001): 215–41.Google Scholar
Guilhembet, J.-P. (2006) ‘Acquérir, louer ou négocier des biens immobiliers de prestige à Rome à la fin de la république et aux premiers siècles de l’empire’, in Sur la ville de Rome (= Cahiers de la MRSH-Caen 46): 91–197.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. (1974) ‘Elite mobility in the Roman Empire’ in Finley, M. I. (ed.) Studies in Ancient Society. London: 103–20. (= Past and Present 32, 1965, 12–26.)Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. (1983) Death and Renewal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Iasiello, I. M. (2004) Dall’IRAP all’Archeoclub: Quarant’anni di ricerche archeologiche in Pietrelcina. Pietrelcina.Google Scholar
Jones, L. (2016) ‘Memory, nostalgia and the Roman home’, in Ruin or Renewal? Places and the Transformation of Memory in the City of Rome, eds. Morcillo, M. García, Richardson, J. H. and Santangelo, F.. Rome: 183–212.Google Scholar
Künzl, E. (1984) ‘Le argenterie’, in Pompei 79: raccolta di studi per il decimonono centenario dell’eruzione vesuviana, ed. Zevi, F.. Naples: 211–28.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (1995) Dynasty and Empire in the Age of Augustus: The Case of the Boscoreale Cups. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K. (2008) ‘Luxus’, in Pompeii and the Roman Villa: Art and Culture around the Bay of Naples, ed. Mattusch, C.. New York: 31–51.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K. (2014) ‘Roman luxury from home to tomb and sanctuary’ in The Berthouville Silver Treasure and Roman Luxury, ed. Lapatin, K.. Los Angeles: 127–47.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K. (2015) Luxus: The Sumptuary Arts of Greece and Rome. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, M. L. and Zevi, F. (1988–1989) ‘Necrocorinthia a Pompei: una idria bronzea per le gare di Argo’, Prospettiva 53/56. Scritti in ricordo di Giovanni Previtali, vol. 1. 133–48.Google Scholar
McClintock, A. (2013) ‘The Lex Voconia and Cornelia’s jewels’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 60: 183–200.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2007) Cicero’s ‘Philippics’ 3–9 Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1992) The Emperor in the Roman World, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Mols, S. T. A. M. (1999) Wooden Furniture in Herculaneum: Form, Technique and Function. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2011) The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mustakallio, K. (1994) Death and Disgrace: Capital Penalties with Post mortem Sanctions in Early Roman Historiography. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Painter, K. S. (2001) The Insula of the Menander at Pompeii vol. IV: The Silver Treasure. Oxford.Google Scholar
Panciera, S. (1979) ‘Catilina e Catone su due coppette romane’, in Φιλίας χάριν: miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni, vol 5. Rome: 1636–62.Google Scholar
Panciera, S. (2006) Epigrafi, epigrafia, epigrafisti: Scritti vari editi e inediti (1956–2005). Con note complementari e indici. Rome.Google Scholar
Panella, C. (1987) ‘L’organizzazzione degli spazi sulle pendici settentrionali del Colle Oppio tra Augusto e i Severi’, in L’Urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome: 611–54.Google Scholar
Panella, C. (1995) ‘Domus: P. Vedius Pollio’, in Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae 2, ed. Steinby, E. M.. Rome: 211–12.Google Scholar
Panella, C. (1999) ‘Porticus Liviae’, in Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae 4, ed. Steinby, E. M.. Rome: 127–9.Google Scholar
Papi, E. (1995a) ‘Domus: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus’, in Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae 2, ed. Steinby, E. M.. Rome: 93.Google Scholar
Papi, E. (1995b) ‘Domus: L. Licinius Crassus’, in Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae 2, ed. Steinby, E. M.. Rome: 128.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. R. (1993) ‘Military organization and social change in the later Roman Republic’, in War and Society in the Roman World, eds. Rich, J. and Shipley, G.. London: 92–112.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. R. (2016) ‘Imperial Rome and the demise of the imperial nobility’, in Ruin or Renewal? Places and the Transformation of Memory in the City of Rome, eds. García Morcillo, M., Richardson, J. H. and Santangelo, F.. Rome: 213–42.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1976) ‘The Ciceronian aristocracy and its properties’, in Studies in Roman Property, ed. Finley, M. I.. Cambridge: 85–102.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. (1992) ‘The praetor and the pyramid: the tomb of Gaius Cestius in history, archaeology and literature’, Bollettino di Archeologia 13–15: 1–30.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. (1989) The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2006) ‘Sulla and the Senate: a reconsideration’, Cahiers Gustave-Glotz 17: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeling, G. (2011) A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2013) The End of the Roman Republic, 146 to 44 BC: Conquest and Crisis. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Strong, D. E. (1966) Greek and Roman Gold and Silver Plate. London.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1961) ‘Who was Vedius Pollio?’, JRS 51: 23–30.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. R. (2002) Benevento romana. Rome.Google Scholar
Van Oyen, A. (2015) ‘The moral architecture of villa storage in Italy in the 1st c. BC’, JRA 28: 97–124.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2000) ‘Case e abitanti a Roma’, in Roma imperiale: una metropoli antica, ed. Lo Cascio, E.. Rome: 173–220.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008) Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2011) Herculaneum: Past and Future. London.Google Scholar
Walters, H. B. (1921) Catalogue of the Silver Plate (Greek, Etruscan, and Roman) in the British Museum. London.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, J. B. and Claridge, A. (1976) Pompeii AD 79. London.Google Scholar
Weaver, P. R. C. (1972) Familia Caesaris: A Social Study of the Emperor’s Freedmen and Slaves. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weaver, P. R. C. (1974) ‘Social mobility in the early Roman empire: the evidence of the imperial freedmen and slaves’, in Studies in Ancient Society, ed. Finley, M.I.. London: 121–40. (= Past and Present 37, 1967: 3–20.)Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1971) New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 BC–AD 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. and Martin, R. H. (eds.) (1996) The Annals of Tacitus Book 3. Edited with a Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zanda, E. (2011) Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1987) ‘Drei Stadtbilder aus dem Augusteischen Rom’, in L’Urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome: 475–89.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×