Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T07:54:05.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Rituals of Integration in the Roman Republic

On the Integrative Force of the Popular Assemblies

from Part II - Translations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

By
Martin Jehne
Edited by
Amy Russell  and
Hans Beck
Translated by
Kathrin Lüddecke
Amy Russell
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Hans Beck
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Get access

Summary

Martin Jehne looks at the Roman comitia through the lens of their rich symbolism. Set in a demarcated space and sanctioned by the auspices of the gods, the popular assemblies were, in general, integrative: they symbolized the belonging of the citizens to the community as a whole. But the assemblies (comitia centuriata, comitia tributa, and comitia curiata) were far from uniform. Each one, argues Jehne, wielded a different type of integrative force upon its participants. The centuriate assembly emphasized hierarchy and vertical integration; the tribal assemblies had an essentially egalitarian structure. In light of a rapidly expanding body of citizens, the integrating capacities of the popular assemblies ought to have shrunk. Creating a climate of consensus and communality, those capacities were preserved in the assemblies’ roles as referential quantities that embodied ideas of hierarchy and equality vital to the libera res publica.

Keywords

Roman RepublicRoman politicspolitical cultureRoman historypopular assembliesdemocracycomitia centuriatacomitia curiatacomitia tributa
Type
Chapter
Information
The Roman Republic and Political Culture
German Scholarship in Translation
 , pp. 200 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althoff, G., ‘Rituale – symbolische Kommunikation: Zu einem neuen Feld der historischen Mittelalterforschung’, GWU 50 (1999), 140–54.Google Scholar
Botsford, G. W., The Roman Assemblies from their Origin to the End of the Republic (1909), New York 1968.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A., Italian Manpower, 225 b.c.–a.d. 14, Oxford 1971.Google Scholar
Buck, R. J., ‘Group Voting in Boiotia’, AHB 4, 1990, 61–4.Google Scholar
Cels-Saint-Hilaire, J., La République des tribus: Du droit de vote et de ses enjeux aux débuts de la République Romaine (495–300 av. J.-C.), Toulouse 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbino, A., ‘La nozione di “comitia calata”’, Iura 42 (1991), 145–50.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (ed.), Roman Statutes, 2 vols., London 1996.Google Scholar
Develin, R., ‘Comitia tributa plebis’, Athenaeum 63 (1975), 302–37.Google Scholar
Develin, R. ‘Comitia tributa Again’, Athenaeum 65 (1977), 425–6.Google Scholar
Farrell, J., ‘The Distinction between comitia and concilium’, Athenaeum 74 (1986), 407–38.Google Scholar
Flaig, E., ‘Entscheidung und Konsens: Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs’, in Jehne, M. (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, Historia Einzelschriften 96, Stuttgart 1995, 77–127.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. ‘War die römische Volksversammlung ein Entscheidungsorgan? Institution und soziale Praxis’, in Blänkner, R. and Jussen, B. (eds), Institutionen und Ereignis: Über historische Praktiken und Vorstellungen gesellschaftlichen Ordnens, Göttingen 1998, 49–73.Google Scholar
Fraccaro, P., ‘La procedura del voto nei comizi tributi Romani’ (1913/14), in Fraccaro, Opuscula 2, Pavia 1957, 235–54.Google Scholar
Gilula, D., ‘The Allocation of Seats to Senators in 194 bce’, in Katzoff, R., Petroff, Y., and Schaps, D. (eds.), Classical Studies in Honor of D. Sohlberg, Ramat Gan 1996, 235–44.Google Scholar
Grieve, L. J., ‘The Reform of the comitia centuriata’, Historia 34 (1985), 278–309.Google Scholar
Hall, U., ‘Voting Procedure in Roman Assemblies’, Historia 13 (1964), 267–306.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K., From Violence to Blessing: Symbols and Rituals in Ancient Rome, in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J. (eds.), City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, Stuttgart 1991, 479–498.Google Scholar
Humm, M., ‘Le Comitium du forum romain et la réforme des tribus d’Appius Claudius Caecus’, MEFRA 111 (1999), 625–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehne, M., ‘Geheime Abstimmung und Bindungswesen in der Römischen Republik’, HZ 257 (1993), 593–613.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. ‘Die Beeinflussung von Entscheidungen durch “Bestechung”: Zur Funktion des ambitus in der römischen Republik’, in Jehne, (ed.), Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, Historia Einzelschriften 96, Stuttgart 1995, 51–76.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. ‘Jovialität und Freiheit: Zur Institutionalität der Beziehungen zwischen Ober- und Unterschichten in der römischen Republik’, in Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, Historia Einzelschriften 141, Stuttgart 2000, 207–35. [Translated as Chapter 4 in this volume.]Google Scholar
Jehne, M. ‘Wirkungsweise und Bedeutung der centuria praerogativa’, Chiron 30 (2000), 661–78.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R., Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik, II: Die Magistratur, Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft x.3.2.2, Munich 1995.Google Scholar
Laser, G., Populo et scaenae serviendum est: Die Bedeutung der städtischen Masse in der Späten Römischen Republik, Bochumer Altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium 29, Trier 1997.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. and Kaminska-Linderski, A., ‘A. Gabinius A.f. Capito and the First Voter in the Legislative comitia tributa’, ZPE 12 (1973), 247–52.Google Scholar
Linke, B., Von der Verwandtschaft zum Staat: Die Entstehung politischer Organisationsformen in der frührömischen Geschichte, Stuttgart 1995.Google Scholar
Linke, B. ‘Religio und res publica: Religiöser Glaube und gesellschaftliches Handeln im republikanischen Rom’, in Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, Historia Einzelschriften 141, Stuttgart 2000, 269–98.Google Scholar
Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Oxford 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, R., ‘How Many Romans Voted?’, Athenaeum 68 (1980), 454–7.Google Scholar
Meier, C., ̒Praerogativa centuria’, RE Suppl. VIII (1956), cols. 567–98.Google Scholar
Meier, C. Res publica amissa: Eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik, Frankfurt a.M. 1980.Google Scholar
Meier, C. ‘Der griechische und der römische Bürger: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede im Ensemble gesellschaftlicher Bedingungen’, in Schmidt, E. G. et al. (eds.), Griechenland und Rom: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Entwicklungstendenzen und -höhepunkten der antiken Geschichte, Kunst und Literatur, Tbilisi 1996, 41–66.Google Scholar
Melville, G. (ed.), SFB 537 ‘Institutionalität und Geschichtlichkeit’: Ein neuer Sonderforschungsbereich stellt sich vor, Dresden 1997.Google Scholar
Melville, G. ‘Institutionen im Mittelalter’, Bulletin de la Société des Amis de l’Institut Historique Allemand 4 (1998), 11–33.Google Scholar
Millar, F., The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic, Ann Arbor 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, T., Römisches Staatsrecht, 3 vols. in 5, 3rd ed. (1887/8), Graz 1952.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R., ‘Publicity, Popularity and Patronage in the Commentariolum Petitionis’, ClassAnt 17 (1998), 259–88.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C., Tributum: Recherches sur la fiscalité directe sous la République romaine, Antiquitas I 24, Bonn 1976.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. Le métier de citoyen dans la Rome républicaine, Paris 1979.Google Scholar
Nippel, W., Aufruhr und ‘Polizei’ in der römischen Republik, Stuttgart 1988.Google Scholar
Paananen, U., ‘Leges de bello indicendo e comizio centuriato’, Athenaeum 78, (1990), 180–6.Google Scholar
Paananen, U. ‘Legislation in the comitia centuriata’, in Senatus populusque Romanus: Studies in Roman Legislation, Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13, Helsinki 1993, 9–73.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. E. A., The Archaic Community of the Romans, Cambridge 1970.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F., Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma, Zaragoza 1989.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. Contra arma verbis: Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik, HABES 22, Stuttgart 1996.Google Scholar
Rawson, E., ‘Discrimina ordinum: the lex Julia theatralis’, PBSR 55 (1987), 83–114.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M., ‘Suffragium’, in Beiträge zur alten Geschichte: Festschrift zu O. Hirschfelds 60. Geburtstag, Berlin 1903, 30–3.Google Scholar
Rotondi, G., Leges publicae populi Romani (1912), Hildesheim 1966.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J., Domi militiae: Die religiöse Konstruktion des Krieges in Rom, Stuttgart 1990. [Translated as Peace and War in Rome: A Religious Construction of Warfare, trans. D. M. B. Richardson, Stuttgart 2019.]Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom, Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 40, Berlin 1995. [Translated as The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History, and the Fasti, trans. D. M. B. Richardson, Chichester 2011.]Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X., ‘Sexagenarians, the Bridge, and the centuria praerogativa’, RhM 138 (1995), 188–90.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. X. ‘Knappe Mehrheiten bei der Wahl zum Consul’, Klio 83 (2001), 402–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, K., ‘The concilium plebis as a Legislative Body during the Republic’, in Senatus populusque Romanus: Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13, Helsinki 1993, 74–96.Google Scholar
Sandberg, K. ‘Tribunician and Non-Tribunician Legislation in Mid-Republican Rome’, in Bruun, C. (ed.), The Roman Middle Republic: Politics, Religion, and Historiography c. 400–133 b.c.: Papers from a Conference at the Institutum Romanum Finlandiae, September 11–12, 1998, Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23, Rome 2000, 121–40.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H., Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic, London 1981.Google Scholar
Staveley, E. S., ‘The Role of the First Voter in Roman Legislative Assemblies’, Historia 18 (1969), 513–20.Google Scholar
Staveley, E. S. Greek and Roman Voting and Elections, London 1972.Google Scholar
Stemmler, M., ‘Die römische Manipularordnung und der Funktionswandel der Centurien’, Klio 82 (2000), 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R., The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic: The Thirty-Five Urban and Rural Tribes, Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome, Rome 1960.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar, Ann Arbor 1966.Google Scholar
Vaahtera, J., ‘Pebbles, Points, or Ballots: The Emergence of the Individual Vote in Rome’, Arctos 24 (1990), 161–77.Google Scholar
Vaahtera, J. ‘The Origin of Latin suffragium’, Glotta 71 (1993), 66–80.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A., ‘Secret Ballot and its Effects in the Late Roman Republic’, Hermes 123 (1995), 426–42.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic, Historia Einzelschriften 128, Stuttgart 1999.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×