Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:00:39.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Relating Production and Perception of L2 Tone

from Part III - Acquiring Suprasegmental Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

By
James Kirby  and
Đinh Lu Giang
Edited by
Ratree Wayland
Ratree Wayland
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers the relation between production and perception of L2 tone in speakers of Kiên Giang Khmer who are fluent to varying degrees in Southern Vietnamese. In addition to directly comparing L2 to L1 performance in tonal production and perception, we explore how perception might be related to the internal organization of a speaker’s own production system by comparing distances between f0 curves to accuracy in a speeded AX discrimination task. Relative to native speakers, we found considerable individual variation among speakers of Kiên Giang Khmer with L2 knowledge of Vietnamese in the degree to which they approximated Vietnamese tonal targets. Production accuracy was most strongly related to age, while discrimination performance correlated best with education. In addition, we observed a weak correlation between the acoustic distance of a Khmer speaker’s production of tone T to the native Vietnamese production of T, and the ability to discriminate tone T from other tones. However, speakers who acoustically separated two tones in their own productions were also more accurate at discriminating those tones in perception, regardless of how well those productions approximated native speaker targets.

Keywords

KhmerVietnameseTonesProductionPerceptionSecondLanguageLexical
Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Speech Learning
Theoretical and Empirical Progress
 , pp. 249 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(4), 981–1005.Google Scholar
Bauman, J., Blodgett, A., Rytting, C. A., & Shamoo, J. (2009). The ups and downs of Vietnamese tones: A description of native speaker and adult learner tone systems for Northern and Southern Vietnamese (Technical Report No. E.5.3 TTO 2118). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James E. Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bettoni-Techio, M., Rauber, A. S., & Koerich, R. D. (2007). Perception and production of word-final alveolar stops by Brazilian Portuguese learners of English. In INTERSPEECH 2007 (pp. 2293–2296), Antwerp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blodgett, A., Bauman, J., Bowles, A., & Winn, M. B. (2008). A comparison of native speaker and American adult learner Vietnamese lexical tones. In Proceedings of Acoustics 08 (pp. 688–692), Paris.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.08).Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1997). Perception and production of a new vowel category by second-language learners. In James, A & Leather, J (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 53–74). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunelle, M. (2015). Vietnamese (Tiếng Việt). In Jenny, M & Sidwell, P (Eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages (Vol. 2, pp. 909–953). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Burnham, D., & Francis, E. (1997). The role of linguistic experience in the perception of Thai tones. In Abramson, A. S. (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honor of Vichin Panupong (pp. 29–48). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Byun, T. M., & Tiede, M. (2017). Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0172022.Google Scholar
Chambers, E. W., de Verdière, Colin, Erickson, É, Lazard, J, Lazarus, S, F., & Thite, S. (2010). Homotopic Fréchet distance between curves or, walking your dog in the woods in polynomial time. Computational Geometry, 43(3), 295–311.Google Scholar
Chen, G. (1974). The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(2), 159–171.Google Scholar
Ding, H., Hoffmann, R., & Jokisch, O. (2011). An investigation of tone perception and production in German learners of Mandarin. Archives of Acoustics, 36(3). doi:10.2478/v10168-011-0036-6Google Scholar
Giang, Đinh Lư. (2011). Tình hình song ngữ Khmer-Việt tại đồng bằng sông Cửu Long: một số vấn đề lý thuyết và thực tiễn [Khmer-Vietnamese bilingualism in the Mekong Delta: Theoretical and practical issues]. PhD dissertation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Giang, Đinh Lư. (2015). Các đặc điểm chính của song ngữ Khmer-Việt vùng Nam Bộ [The main features of Khmer-Vietnamese bilingualism in the South]. Ngôn ngữ & Đời sóng, 4(234), 81–88.Google Scholar
Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). The relationship between perception and production of Brazilian Portuguese vowels in European Spanish monolinguals. Loquens, 3(2), e031.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. R. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(3), 1589–1608.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). The relation between L2 production and perception. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (pp. 1273–1276), Berkeley.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 268–294.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. T. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.Google Scholar
General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2010). The 2009 Vietnam population and housing census: Major findings. Hanoi: General Statistics Office of Vietnam. Retrieved from www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=9813Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. S., Matthies, M. L., Maas, E., … Perkell, J. S. (2010). An investigation of the relation between sibilant production and somatosensory and auditory acuity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(5), 3079–3087.Google Scholar
Guenther, F. H., & Perkell, J. S. (2004). A neural model of speech production and supporting experiments. In From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication (pp. B98–B106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32(3), 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Châu, Hoàng Thị. (1989). Tiếng Việt trên các miền đất nước: Phương ngữ học [Vietnamese in the various areas of the motherland: A dialectological study]. Hà Nội: NXB Khoa học Xã hội.Google Scholar
Huang, T. (2007). Perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese-and English-speaking listeners. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1797–1800), Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817–832.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. (2014). Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 69–85.Google Scholar
Kirby, J., & Giang, Đinh Lư. (2017). On the r>h shift in Kiên Giang Khmer. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 10(2), 66–85.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D. A., & Wurm, L. H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(5), 527–542.Google Scholar
Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llisterri, J. (1995). Relationships between speech production and speech perception in a second language. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 92–99), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (1998). Can language learners ever acquire the intonation of a second language? In STiLL-1998 (pp. 17–20), Marholmen, Sweden.Google Scholar
Miracle, W. C. (1989). Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 49–65.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S. (2003). Perception and production of Spanish vowels by English speakers. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1533–1536), Barcelona.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (2007). Dynamic time warping. In Information retrieval for music and motion (pp. 69–84). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234–270.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. T., & Macken, M. A. (2008). Factors affecting the production of Vietnamese tones: A study of American learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 49–77.Google Scholar
Huệ, Nguyễn Thị. (2010). Tiếp xúc ngôn ngữ giữa tiếng Khmer với tiếng Việt (trường hợp tỉnh Trà Vinh) [Language contact between Khmer and and Vietnamese in Tra Vinh province]. PhD dissertation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Lợi, Nguyễn Văn & Edmondson, J. A. (1998). Tone and voice quality in modern northern Vietnamese: Instrumental case studies. Mon-Khmer Studies, 28, 1–18.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Bouchon, C. (2011). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 161–164), Florence.Google Scholar
Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., … Zandipour, M. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2338–2344.Google Scholar
Phạm, A. H. (2003). Vietnamese tone: A new analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(3), 243–261.Google Scholar
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sochoeun, C. (2006). Khmer Krom migration and their identity. MA thesis, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1995). Phonetics of second-language acquisition: Past, present, future. In Branderud, P & Elenius, K (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 76–83), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Minh, Thạch Ngọc. (1999). Monosyllabization in Kiengiang Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies, 29, 81–95.Google Scholar
Phương, Vũ Thanh. (1982). Phonetic properties of Vietnamese tones across dialects. In Bradley, D (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics: No. 8. Tonation (pp. 55–76). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–1043.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (2012). L2 acquisition and processing of Mandarin tones. In Li, P, Tan, L. H., Bates, E, & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 250–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(01), 113–129.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(6), 1866–1878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, B. (2012). The gap between the perception and production of tones by American learners of Mandarin – an intralingual perspective. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 1(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B. (2015). Perception and production of Mandarin tones by native speakers and L2 learners. Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44645-4Google Scholar
Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., Andreeva, B., Möbius, B., & Trouvain, J. (2014). Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 1037–1041), Dublin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×