Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Reconstructing Shakespeare, or Harlotry in Bardolatry
- Playing Shakespeare
- Take me to your Leda
- Sign Theory and Shakespeare
- Time in Richard III
- New Concepts of Staging A Midsummer Night’s Dream
- Henry V as Working-House of Ideology
- Shakespeare and his Sources: Observations on the Critical History of Julius Caesar
- The Speculative Eye: Problematic Self-Knowledge in Julius Caesar
- Learning by Talking: Conversation in As You Like It
- Measure for Measure: Mirror for Mirror
- Allegory and Irony in Othello
- Cruelty, King Lear and the South African Land Act 1913
- The Rationale of Current Bibliographical Methods: Printing House Studies, Computer-Aided Compositor Studies, and the Use of Statistical Methods
- Shakespeare’s Late Plays at Stratford, Ontario
- Shakespeare Performances in London, Manchester and Stratford-upon-Avon 1985–6
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Editions and Textual Studies
- Index
3 - Editions and Textual Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- Reconstructing Shakespeare, or Harlotry in Bardolatry
- Playing Shakespeare
- Take me to your Leda
- Sign Theory and Shakespeare
- Time in Richard III
- New Concepts of Staging A Midsummer Night’s Dream
- Henry V as Working-House of Ideology
- Shakespeare and his Sources: Observations on the Critical History of Julius Caesar
- The Speculative Eye: Problematic Self-Knowledge in Julius Caesar
- Learning by Talking: Conversation in As You Like It
- Measure for Measure: Mirror for Mirror
- Allegory and Irony in Othello
- Cruelty, King Lear and the South African Land Act 1913
- The Rationale of Current Bibliographical Methods: Printing House Studies, Computer-Aided Compositor Studies, and the Use of Statistical Methods
- Shakespeare’s Late Plays at Stratford, Ontario
- Shakespeare Performances in London, Manchester and Stratford-upon-Avon 1985–6
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Editions and Textual Studies
- Index
Summary
‘No longer the tiresome repetitions: “Who is the real author?” “Have we proof of his authenticity and originality?” ’, urges Michel Foucault. However, theorists who share his views continue to publish books under their own names – and to collect their royalties. And questions of authorship still arouse widespread interest. When they concern Shakespeare the stakes are high. For admission to the Shakespeare canon confers status on a work, guaranteeing sympathetic attention from critics, producers, readers, and playgoers. Had 1 Henry VI been excluded from the First Folio, would it have appeared quite the unified product of youthful genius that commentators find it today? And had the anonymous chronicle play Edmund Ironside, preserved in a manuscript of the late-sixteenth or early-seventeenth century, been included in the First Folio, would everyone have accepted its authenticity? Eric Sams believes so, and has published a modern-spelling edition with introduction and elaborate commentary designed to convince us that Edmund Ironside was written by Shakespeare at the beginning of his career as a dramatist.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 224 - 236Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1988
- 1
- Cited by