Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare the Historian
- The Decline of the Chronicle and Shakespeare's History Plays
- Rites of Oblivion in Shakespearian History Plays
- Richard II's Yorkist Editors
- Mapping the Globe: The Cartographic Gaze and Shakespeare's Henry IV Part 1
- Falstaff's Belly: Pathos, Prosthetics and Performance
- ‘And is Old Double Dead?’: Nation and Nostalgia in Henry IV Part 2
- Performing the Conflated Text of Henry IV: The Fortunes of Part Two
- Medley History: The Famous Victories of Henry the Fifth to Henry V
- Georgic Sovereignty in Henry V
- The Troublesome Reign, Richard II, and the Date of King John: A Study in Intertextuality
- The Trials of Queen Katherine in Henry VIII
- ‘Watch Out for Two-handed Swords’: Double-Edged Poetics in Howard Barker's Henry V in Two Parts (1971)
- Daunted at a Woman's Sight?: The Use and Abuse of Female Presence in Performances of the Histories as Cycles
- The RSC's ‘Glorious Moment’ and the Making of Shakespearian History
- Shakespeare as War Memorial: Remembrance and commemoration in the Great War
- Shakespearian Biography, Biblical Allusion and Early Modern Practices of Reading Scripture
- Filling in the ‘Wife-Shaped Void’: The Contemporary Afterlife of Anne Hathaway
- Shakespeare and Machiavelli: A Caveat
- Shame and Reflection in Montaigne and Shakespeare
- Playing the Law for Lawyers: Witnessing, Evidence and the Law of Contract in The Comedy of Errors
- Shakespeare's Narcissus: Omnipresent Love in Venus and Adonis
- Surface Tensions: Ceremony and Shame in Much Ado About Nothing
- ‘Remember Me’: Shylock on the Postwar German Stage
- ‘Dangerous and Rebel Prince’: A Television Adaptation of Hamlet in Late Francoist Spain
- What Shakespeare Did with the Queen's Men's King Leir and When
- Re-cognizing Leontes
- Shakespeare Performances in England 2009
- Professional Shakespeare Productions in the British Isles, January–December 2008
- The Year's Contribution to Shakespeare Studies 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare in Performance
- 3 Editions and Textual Studies
- Index to Volume 63
Rites of Oblivion in Shakespearian History Plays
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2010
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare the Historian
- The Decline of the Chronicle and Shakespeare's History Plays
- Rites of Oblivion in Shakespearian History Plays
- Richard II's Yorkist Editors
- Mapping the Globe: The Cartographic Gaze and Shakespeare's Henry IV Part 1
- Falstaff's Belly: Pathos, Prosthetics and Performance
- ‘And is Old Double Dead?’: Nation and Nostalgia in Henry IV Part 2
- Performing the Conflated Text of Henry IV: The Fortunes of Part Two
- Medley History: The Famous Victories of Henry the Fifth to Henry V
- Georgic Sovereignty in Henry V
- The Troublesome Reign, Richard II, and the Date of King John: A Study in Intertextuality
- The Trials of Queen Katherine in Henry VIII
- ‘Watch Out for Two-handed Swords’: Double-Edged Poetics in Howard Barker's Henry V in Two Parts (1971)
- Daunted at a Woman's Sight?: The Use and Abuse of Female Presence in Performances of the Histories as Cycles
- The RSC's ‘Glorious Moment’ and the Making of Shakespearian History
- Shakespeare as War Memorial: Remembrance and commemoration in the Great War
- Shakespearian Biography, Biblical Allusion and Early Modern Practices of Reading Scripture
- Filling in the ‘Wife-Shaped Void’: The Contemporary Afterlife of Anne Hathaway
- Shakespeare and Machiavelli: A Caveat
- Shame and Reflection in Montaigne and Shakespeare
- Playing the Law for Lawyers: Witnessing, Evidence and the Law of Contract in The Comedy of Errors
- Shakespeare's Narcissus: Omnipresent Love in Venus and Adonis
- Surface Tensions: Ceremony and Shame in Much Ado About Nothing
- ‘Remember Me’: Shylock on the Postwar German Stage
- ‘Dangerous and Rebel Prince’: A Television Adaptation of Hamlet in Late Francoist Spain
- What Shakespeare Did with the Queen's Men's King Leir and When
- Re-cognizing Leontes
- Shakespeare Performances in England 2009
- Professional Shakespeare Productions in the British Isles, January–December 2008
- The Year's Contribution to Shakespeare Studies 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare in Performance
- 3 Editions and Textual Studies
- Index to Volume 63
Summary
This article is about rites of oblivion in Shakespearian history plays and Elizabethan culture. The conjunction of ritual and forgetting might well seem paradoxical at first sight. After all, ritual is both formally and functionally associated with memory: rehearsing highly conventionalized topoi, gestures and acts, ritual is built on repetition and recognition. It works effectively only as a formalized act that recalls a social frame of reference which asserts the validity of the ritual and in turn is asserted by it. By the same token, cultural memory depends on rites of commemoration that ‘invite, rehearse or enforce social modes of recollection’. The words ‘re-collection’ and ‘re-member’ point to both the repetitive form and the social function of ritual: turning individual members of society into an imagined community, it serves to establish continuity and collective identity. Given this mutually constitutive relation between ritual and memory, can there also be rites of oblivion? If so, what form would such ritual forgetting take, and what would be its social function? What cultural work does oblivion perform? Is there, in short, an ars oblivionalis just as there is an ars memorativa?
In a seminal essay of 1988, Umberto Eco addresses this last question and negates it categorically. From his semiological perspective, forgetting is the reverse of memory and, by extension, of the use of signs as ‘a means of making present, never absent’. He deduces from this that neither the acts of oblivion nor their effects can ever be represented, that forgetting is a priori excluded from the cultural economy of signs and meanings. Likewise, whereas he sees remembrance as a constitutive force of culture and society, Eco dismisses forgetting as a destructive force of nature beyond human control and intentionality. I would like to suggest here that memory and oblivion are in fact complementary rather than mutually exclusive forces and that forgetting can indeed be purposeful and deliberate. Based on this premise, I will explore how the relation between mnemonic rites and oblivion is represented on the early modern stage.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 24 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010