Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:45:20.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shakespeare and the coconuts: close encounters in post-apartheid South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

South African literary history is full of the effects of writers having had close encounters with the Shakespeare text. The results have been literary and personal, with writers displaying, and often-times clearly experiencing, a profound emotional connection to, especially, the plays. Since the days of the mission schools in colonial Southern Africa, Shakespeare has been a signifier of education, civility and erudition, as well as a vehicle for the expression of strong feelings. Encounters with the Shakespeare text have shaped hopes, allowed for public self-fashioning, and have influenced more intimate subjectivities as writers and scholars of a particular class stratification were educated in English Literature. Something has changed, though, in terms of what a close encounter with Shakespeare enables. If Shakespeare used to be part of a marker of class and social mobility located in the terms of a discourse of progress and modernity, knowledge of Shakespeare now comprises a much more publicly ambivalent display. Shakespeare once had a particular currency, acquired personally but activated publicly, which he appears to be losing. This article will attempt to account for the change, suggesting that it reveals the gap between theory and lived experience. Close encounters with Shakespeare viewed through a post-colonial lens illustrate that culture is hybrid. Nevertheless, in the face of ongoing socio-economic power differentials which operate along raced and classed axes, the logic of a binary structure of identity continues to inform an experience of Shakespeare in South Africa long after our own cultural artifacts reveal that binary models are an artificial and inadequate way to understand how people live, including how they live with Shakespeare.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 211 - 221
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×