Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:43:41.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shakespeare's Narcissus: Omnipresent Love in Venus and Adonis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2010

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Love doth approach disguised, / Armèd in arguments

(Love's Labour's Lost, 5.2.83–4)

Imagine Narcissus had found his reflection in an object that was animate rather than inanimate. Imagine him with the same ‘fixed staring eyes’, the same ‘wretched rage’, the same vanity, destructiveness and self-pity, yet finding himself in the eyes of another person instead of a pool of water. Imagine him then not as a mortal man but an immortal goddess. Do so, and you have the basic idea of Shakespeare's Venus and Adonis, a minor Ovidian epic that tells one love-story not found even in Ovid – a story of love itself in love with love itself.

The story of Narcissus is without doubt an important source text for this poem. Venus compares Adonis to Narcissus more than once for failing to respond to her sexual advances. Many critics accept her judgement of the boy as narcissistic. Colin Burrow calls Adonis one of Shakespeare's ‘great’ narcissists. Coppélia Kahn calls the poem a ‘dramatization of narcissism’, in which the boy's attempt to ‘protect himself against the threat of love actually results in his self-destruction’. Jonathan Bate speaks of Adonis's ‘self-consuming absorption’, while Kenneth Muir finds in his death a kind of moral – that ‘beauty which refuses love is doomed to destruction and decay’. Other critics accept his narcissism with some qualification. Heather Dubrow, for example, sees Venus herself as ‘self-centered’ in a number of ways, yet for the most part agrees to the validity of the goddess’s charge, suspecting ‘subterranean motives’ of the boy for his resistance. Anthony Mortimer similarly thinks that Adonis will know no ‘other’, but appreciates certain reasons why he might not want to know Venus in particular.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 272 - 281
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×