Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:13:39.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2024

Nicholas Luke
Nicholas Luke
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare's Political Spirit
Negative Theology and the Disruption of Power
 , pp. 265 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adelman, J., “‘Anger’s My Meat’: Feeding, Dependency, and Aggression in Coriolanus”. In Shakespeare: Pattern of Excelling Nature, eds. Bevington, David and Halio, Jay L. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London: Associated University Press, 1978, 108–24.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Trans. E. F. N. Jephcott. London: Verso, 1978.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Negative Dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Problems of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Schröder, Thomas. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Agamben, G., Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Trans. and Ed. Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Agamben, G., The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Trans. Patricia Dailey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bacon, F., The Major Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Being and Event. Trans. Oliver Feltham. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., The Century. Trans. Alberto Toscano. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., In Praise of Love. Trans. Peter Bush. London: Serpent’s Tail, 2012.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Metapolitics. Trans. Jason Barker. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Plato’s Republic: A Dialogue in 16 Chapters. Trans. Susan Spitzer. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Badiou, B., “Rhapsody for the Theatre: A Short Philosophical Treatise”. Trans. Bruno Bosteels. Theatre Survey 49.2 (2008), 187–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badiou, A., Theory of the Subject. Trans. Bruno Bosteels. London: Continuum, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badiou, A., and Žižek, S., Philosophy in the Present. Ed. Engelmann, Peter. Trans. Peter Thomas and Alberto Toscano. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.Google Scholar
Bate, J., How the Classics Made Shakespeare. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Beckwith, S., Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W., The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. John Osborne. London: NLB, 1977.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W., Selected Writings. 4 vols. Ed. Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1996–2003.Google Scholar
Betteridge, T., Shakespearean Fantasy and Politics. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bloom, H., Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. New York: Riverhead, 2003.Google Scholar
Bloom, H., Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate, 1999.Google Scholar
Boitani, P., The Gospel According to Shakespeare. Trans. Vittorio Montemaggi and Rachel Jacoff. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.Google Scholar
The Book of Common Prayer: The Texts of 1549, 1559, and 1662. Ed. Cummings, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brecht, B., Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Trans. John Willett. New York: Hill and Wang, 1964.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G., A Dialogue on the Law of Kingship among the Scots: A Critical Edition and Translation of George Buchan’s De Iure Regni apud Scotos Dialogus. Ed. Mason, Roger A. and Smith, Martin S.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Burrow, C., Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cartelli, T., “Jack Cade in the Garden: Class Consciousness and Class Conflict in 2 Henry VI”. In Enclosure Acts: Sexuality, Property, and Culture in Early Modern England, eds. Burt, Richard and Archer, John Michael. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994, 48–67.Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, C. J., The Staging of Romance in Late Shakespeare: Text and Theatrical Technique. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T., Biographia Literaria. 2 vols. Eds. Engell, James and Bate, W. Jackson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, P., Sudden Shakespeare: The Shaping of Shakespeare’s Creative Thought. London: Athlone, 1996.Google Scholar
De Grazia, M., Hamlet without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., The Gift of Death. Trans. David Wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Dollimore, J., Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Reissued 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donne, J., Devotions upon Emergent Occasions. Ed. Raspa, Antony. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Donne, J., The Sermons of John Donne. 10 vols. Eds. Potter, George and Simpson, Evelyn. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1953–1962.Google Scholar
Doty, J. S., “Experiences of Authority in The Tempest”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 236–54.Google Scholar
Drakakis, J., “‘Fashion it thus’: Julius Caesar and the Politics of Theatrical Representation”. Shakespeare Survey 44 (1991), 65–74.Google Scholar
Duncombe, S., Ed., The Open Utopia. https://theopenutopia.org/full-text/introduction-open-utopia/ (accessed 14 September 2022).Google Scholar
Eckhart, M., Meister Eckhart: A Modern Translation. Trans. Raymond Bernard Blakney. New York: Harper Touchbooks, 1941.Google Scholar
Eckhart, M., Mesiter Eckhart: From Whom God Hid Nothing: Sermons, Writings and Sayings. Ed. O’Neal, David. Boston: Shambhala, 1996.Google Scholar
Elgendy, R., “Response to Martin Kavka”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizabeth, I, Elizabeth I: Collected Works. Eds. Marcus, Leah S., Mueller, Janel, and Rose, Mary Beth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
The English Bible, King James Version: The New Testament and the Apocrypha. Eds. Hammond, Gerald and Busch, Austin. Norton Critical Editions. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar
The English Bible, King James Version: The Old Testament. Ed. Marks, Herbert. Norton Critical Editions. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar
“An Exhortation Concerning Good Order, and Obedience to Rulers and Magistrates”. Ed. Ian Lancashire. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1994; HTML version, The Anglican Library, 1999. Available at www.anglicanlibrary.org/homilies/bk2hom21.htm (accessed 24 November 2021).Google Scholar
Felperin, H., “Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism of The Tempest”. In The Tempest, ed. Wood, Nigel. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995, 29–66.Google Scholar
Fernie, E., Shakespeare for Freedom: Why the Plays Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernie, E., Shame in Shakespeare. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Fernie, E., ed., Spiritual Shakespeares. London: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, H., The Biblical Presence in Shakespeare, Milton, and Blake. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitter, C., Majesty and the Masses in Shakespeare and Marlowe. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Fitter, C., Radical Shakespeare: Politics and Stagecraft in the Early Career. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Fitter, C., ed., Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners: Digesting the New Social History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, M., Shakespeare After All. New York: Anchor, 2004.Google Scholar
The Geneva Bible: A Facsimile of the 1560 Edition. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2021.Google Scholar
Gibson, A., Beckett and Badiou: The Pathos of Intermittency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Girard, R., A Theater of Envy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. C., The Meaning of Shakespeare. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J., James I and the Politics of Literature: Jonson, Shakespeare, Donne, and their Contemporaries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S., Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S., “Murdering Peasants: Status, Genre, and the Representation of Rebellion”. Representations 1 (1983), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, S., Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, A., and Ichikawa, M., Staging in Shakespeare’s Theatres. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, A., Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, A., Shakespeare and the Homilies: And Other Pieces of Research into the Elizabethan Drama. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, W., Characters of Shakespear’s Plays and Lectures on the English Poets. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. 2 vols. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Mind. 2nd ed. Trans. J. B. Baillie. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1961.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hill, C., Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C., “The Many-Headed Monster in Late Tudor and Early Stuart Political Thinking”. In From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation: Essays in Honour of Garrett Mattingly, ed. Carter, Charles H.. London: Jonathan Cape, 1966, 296–324.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., Hobbes: Leviathan: Revised Student Edition. Ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höfele, A., No Hamlets: German Shakespeare from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, P., “The Left and King Lear”. Textual Practice 14.2 (2000), 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“An Homilie against Disobedience and Wilfull Rebellion”. Ed. Ian Lancashire. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1994; HTML version, The Anglican Library, 1999. Available at www.anglicanlibrary.org/homilies/bk2hom21.htm (accessed 24 November 2021).Google Scholar
Höpfl, H., Ed., Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hulme, P., Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797. London: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Hutson, L., The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, L., “Noises Off: Participatory Justice in 2 Henry VI”. In The Law in Shakespeare, eds. Jordan, Constance and Cunningham, Karen. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2007, 143–66.Google Scholar
James VI and I, King James VI and I: Political Writings. Ed. Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Johnston, A., Badiou, Žižek, and Political Transformations: The Cadence of Change. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, E., The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Kavka, M., “A Mystic Conception of History: Negative Political Theology in Jacob Taubes”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keats, J., Selected Letters of John Keats. Ed. Scott, Grant F.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Fear and Trembling and The Sickness unto Death. Trans. Walter Lowrie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Trans. David F. Swenson and Walter Lowrie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Philosophical Fragments, Johannes Climacus. Ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S., Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. Ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Knight, G. W., The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies Including the Roman Plays. 3rd ed. London: Methuen, 1951.Google Scholar
Knowles, R., “The Farce of History: Miracle, Combat, and Rebellion in 2 ‘Henry VI’”. Yearbook of English Studies 21 (1991), 168–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojève, A., Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Trans. James H. Nichols, Jr. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R., Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. Keith Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kuzner, J., Shakespeare as a Way of Life: Skeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Longstaffe, S., “The Plebeians Revise the Uprising: What the Actors Made of Shakespeare’s Jack Cade – Or, Laughing with the English Radical Tradition”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 124–45.Google Scholar
Luke, N., “Avoidance as Love: Evading Cavell on Dover Cliff”. Modern Philology 117.4 (2020), 445–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, N., “A Lawful Magic: New Worlds of Precedent in Mabo and The Winter’s Tale”. In Shakespeare Survey 73: Shakespeare and the City, ed. Smith, Emma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 129–44.Google Scholar
Luke, N., Shakespearean Arrivals: The Birth of Character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N., Discourses on Livy. Trans. Julia Conaway Bondanella and Peter Bondanella. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N., The Prince. Trans. Tim Parks. N.p.: Penguin Classics, 2014.Google Scholar
Marshall, C., Last Things and Late Plays: Shakespearean Eschatology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M., Essays. 3 vols. Trans. John Florio. London: Dent, 1980.Google Scholar
Mooney, E. F., “The Intimate Agency of Death”. In Kierkegaard and Death, ed. Stokes, Patrick and Buben, Adam J. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011, 133–49.Google Scholar
More, T., Utopia. In Three Early Modern Utopias: Utopia, New Atlantis, and The Isle of Pines. Ed. Bruce, Susan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Mullaney, S., The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, I., The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave, 2005.Google Scholar
Nancy, J., The Ground of the Image. Trans. Jeff Fort. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Newheiser, D., “Desacralizing Political Theology: Dionysius the Areopagite and Giorgio Agamben”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newheiser, D., Hope in a Secular Age: Deconstruction, Negative Theology, and the Future of Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newheiser, D., “Why the World Needs Negative Political Theology”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbrook, D., “Rehearsing the Plebeians: Coriolanus and the Reading of Roman History”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 180–216.Google Scholar
Palfrey, S., Late Shakespeare: A New World of Words. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.Google Scholar
Palfrey, S., and Stern, T., Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, B. L., “‘A Thing Unfirm’: Plato’s Republic and Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar”. Shakespeare Quarterly 44.1 (1993), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, A., Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Plato, Plato: Complete Works. Ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Plutarch, Plutarch: Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Ed. Clough, Arthur Hugh. Oxford: Benediction Classics, 2015.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite, The Divine Names and Mystical Theology. Trans. John D. Jones. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Rollison, D., “Shakespeare’s Commonwealth”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 64–83.Google Scholar
Ryan, K., “Shakespearean Comedy and Romance: The Utopian Imagination”. In Shakespeare’s Romances, ed. Thorne, Alison. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2003, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, K., Shakespearean Tragedy. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, K., “Shakespeare’s Inhumanity”. Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013), 220–31.Google Scholar
Sawday, J., Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalkwyk, D., Shakespeare, Love and Service. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, S., Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaheen, N., Biblical References in Shakespeare’s Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W., Henry VI: Part Two. Ed. Warren, Roger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W., The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd ed. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen et al. New York: W. W. Norton, 2016.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W., The Tempest. Ed. Orgel, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Sidney, P., The Major Works. Ed. Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, T., De Republica Anglorum. Ed. Deward, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Ambrose, St, Ambrose: De Officiis. Trans. and ed. Davidson, Ivor J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Online edition.Google Scholar
States, B. O., Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theater. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, B., “Shakespeare’s Mob Scenes: A Reinterpretation”. Huntington Library Quarterly 8.3 (1945), 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, R., “Faithful Servants: Shakespeare’s Praise of Disobedience”. In The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture, ed. Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 104–33.Google Scholar
Strier, R., “King Lear and Social Security”. Raritan 40.2 (Fall 2020), 63–72.Google Scholar
Strong, T. B., “Seeing the Sovereign: Theatricality and Representation in Hobbes”. In Letting Be: Fred Dallmayr’s Cosmopolitical Vision, ed. Schneck, Stephen F.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006, 33–54.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W., The Elizabethan World Picture. New York: Macmillan, 1950.Google Scholar
Tupper, F., Jr., “The Shaksperean Mob”. PMLA, 27.4 (1912), 486–523.Google Scholar
Weil, S., Gravity and Grace. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Weil, S., Simone Weil: An Anthology. Ed. Miles, Siân. London: Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar
Wiegandt, K., Crowd and Rumour in Shakespeare. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Williams, R., “Response to Amy Hollywood”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 53–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R., “‘Is this a Holiday?’: Shakespeare’s Roman Carnival”. ELH 54.1 (1987), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witmore, M., Shakespearean Metaphysics. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Wolin, R., Walter Benjamin: An Aesthetic of Redemption. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C., “Event or Exception?: Disentangling Badiou from Schmitt, or, Towards a Politics of the Void”. Theory and Event 11.2 (2008).Google ScholarPubMed
Žižek, S., In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso, 2008.Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S., Violence. New York: Picador, 2008.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Nicholas Luke, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Shakespeare's Political Spirit
  • Online publication: 12 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009348232.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Nicholas Luke, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Shakespeare's Political Spirit
  • Online publication: 12 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009348232.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Nicholas Luke, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Shakespeare's Political Spirit
  • Online publication: 12 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009348232.009
Available formats
×