Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:35:48.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Thinking, Perceiving and Acting with Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Edited by
Sukhvinder S. Obhi  and
Emily S. Cross
Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Emily S. Cross
Affiliation:
Bangor University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shared Representations
Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life
 , pp. 193 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akiyama, T., Kato, M., Muramatsu, T., Saito, F., Umeda, S., & Kashima, H. (2006). Gaze but not arrows: A dissociative impairment after right superior temporal gyrus damage. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1804–1810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, T. J., Davies-Thompson, J., Kingstone, A., & Young, A. W. (2010). Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 3544–3552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayliss, A. P., Murphy, E., Naughtin, C. K., Kritikos, A., Schilbach, L., & Becker, S. I. (2013). ‘Gaze leading’: Initiating simulated joint attention influences eye movements and choice behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bindemann, M., Scheepers, C., & Burton, A. M. (2009). Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2008a). Social attention and real world scenes: The roles of action, competition, and social content. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 986–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., (2008b). Gaze selection in complex social scenes. Visual Cognition, 16(2/3), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., (2009). Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes. Vision Research, 49, 2992–3000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birmingham, E., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Human social attention: A new look at past, present and future investigations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 118–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buck, R., Loslow, J. I., Murphy, M. M., & Costanzo, P. (1992). Social facilitation and inhibition of emotional expression and communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 962–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calder, A. J., Beaver, J. D., Winston, J. S., Dolan, R. J., Jenkins, R., Eger, E., & Henson, R. N. A (2007). Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule. Current Biology, 17, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R., Heywood, C. A., Cowey, A., Regard, M., & Landis, T. (1990). Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1123–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, J. T., Tracey, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutrot, A., & Guyader, N. (2014). How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deaner, R. O., & Platt, M. P. (2003). Reflexive social attention in monkeys and humans. Current Biology, 13, 1609–1613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Review, 24, 581–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, N., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, M., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulsham, T., & Sanderson, L. A. (2013). Look who’s talking? Sound changes gaze behavior in a dynamic social scene. Visual Cognition, 21, 922–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulsham, T., Walker, E., & Kingstone, A. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51, 1920–1931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2013). What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PLoS One, 8(1), e53286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, A. C., Hale, J. J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Garnier, S., Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2012). Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 7245–7250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(1), 38–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. M., Williams, C. C., & Falk, R. (2005). Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heywood, C. A., Cowey, A., & Rolls, E. T. (1992). The role of the face cell area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 335, 31–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, E. A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kampe, K. K., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2003) ‘Hey John’: Signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with ‘mentalizing,’ regardless of modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5258–5263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingstone, A., Tipper, C., Ristic, J., & Ngan, E. (2004). The eyes have it! An fMRI investigation. Brain & Cognition, 55, 269–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laidlaw, K. E. W., Foulsham, T., Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 5548–5553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laidlaw, K. E. W., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2012). A new look at social attention: Orienting to the eyes is not (entirely) under volitional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1132–1143.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, J., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Monsters are people too. Biology Letters, 9, 20120850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasiopoulos, E., Risko, E. F., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2014). Wearable computing: Will it make people prosocial? British Journal of Psychology, 106, 109-216.Google ScholarPubMed
Pelphrey, K. A., Sasson, N. J., Reznick, S., Paul, G., Goldman, B. D., & Piven, J. (2002). Visual scanning of faces in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putz, V. R. (1975). The effects of different modes of supervision on vigilance behavior. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Eyes wide shut: Implied social presence, eye tracking and attention. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Real vs. Reel: An empirical approach to the equivalence of different ‘social’ stimuli. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 143.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2010). Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2702–2715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real world scenes. Brain Research, 1080, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Rompay, T. J. L., Vonk, D. J., & Fransen, M. L. (2008). The eye of the camera: Effects of security cameras on prosocial behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 632–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, E., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2014). Fillers as signals: Evidence from a question-answering paradigm. Discourse Processes, 51, 264–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker-Smith, G., Gale, A. G., & Findlay, J. M. (1977). Eye movement strategies involved in face perception. Perception, 6, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, D. W.-L., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Looking while eating: The importance of social context to social attention. Scientific Reports, 3, 2356.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, D. W.-L., Bischof, W. F., (2014). Natural gaze signaling in a social context. Evolution & Human Behavior, 35, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision (B. Haigh, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15, 2256–2262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 410–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baus, C., Sebanz, N., de la Fuente, V., Branzi, F. M., Martin, C., & Costa, A. (2014). On predicting others’ words: Electrophysiological evidence of prediction in speech production. Cognition, 133, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicho, E., Erlhagen, W., Louro, L., & Costa e Silva, E. (2011). Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of decision making in joint action: A human–robot interaction study. Human Movement Science, 30(5), 846–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckler, A., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2012). Effects of a coactor’s focus of attention on task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1404–1415.Google ScholarPubMed
Bosga, J., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2007). Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Motor Control, 11, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. Philosophical Review, 101, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. (2009). Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies, 114(1), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In Trueswell, J. & Tanenhaus, M. (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 95–129.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465–1477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownell, C. A. (2011). Early developments in joint action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfill, S. (2012). Joint action and development. Philosophical Quarterly, 62(246), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, F., Li, C., & Wang, B. (2013). Coupling among speakers during synchronous speaking in English and Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, T., Riley, M., Shockley, K., & Cummins-Sebree, S. (2010). Perceiving affordances for joint actions. Perception, 39(12), 1624–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doerrfeld, A., Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2012). Expecting to lift a box together makes the load look lighter. Psychological Research, 76, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1248–1260.Google ScholarPubMed
Dragan, A., Lee, K., & Srinivasa, S. (2013). Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI). www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2013/3/legiilitypredictabilityIEEE.pdf.Google Scholar
Dragan, A., & Srinivasa, S. (2013). Generating legible motion. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2013/6/legibility_analysis.pdf.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskenazi, T., Doerrfeld, A., Logan, G. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Your words are my words: Effects of acting together on encoding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1026–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francois, D., Powell, S., & Dautenhahn, K. (2009). A long-term study of children with autism playing with a robotic pet: Taking inspirations from non-directive play therapy to encourage children’s proactivity and initiative-taking. Interaction Studies, 10(3), 324–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S., & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102, 415–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, M. (1992). On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception, 26(5), 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 419–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114(3), 348–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, X., Lever, A. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2011). Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 429–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, G., & Ju, W. (2014). Designing robots with movement in mind. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 1(1), 78–95.Google Scholar
Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G. W., & Bedford, J. (2011). The relations between joint action and theory of mind: A neuropsychological analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), 529–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iani, C., Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Arcuri, L., & Rubichi, S. (2011). The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. E., Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1006–1016.Google ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2013). One-year-olds warn others about negative action outcomes. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(3), 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2220–2230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourtis, D., Knoblich, G., Wozniak, M., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(10), 2275–2286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Predictive representation of other people’s actions in joint action planning: An EEG study. Social Neuroscience, 8, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kröger, B. J., Kopp, S., & Lowit, A. (2010). A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication. Cognitive Processing, 11, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krych-Appelbaum, M., Law, J. B., Jones, D., Barnacz, A., Johnson, A., & Keenan, J. P. (2007). ‘I think I know what you mean’: The role of theory of mind in collaborative communication. Interaction Studies, 8(2), 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liepelt, R., Schneider, J. C., Aichert, D. S., Wöstmann, N., Dehning, S., et al. (2012). Action blind: Disturbed self–other integration in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3775–3780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehr, J., Kourtis, D., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehr, J. D., & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153–2167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manera, V., Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Sartori, L., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 547–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1217–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClung, J. S., Jentzsch, I., & Reich, S. D. (2013). Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: Failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task. PLoS ONE, 8(11): e79178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Bekkering, H., Haartsen, R., Stapel, J. C., & Hunnius, S. (2015). The role of action prediction and inhibitory control for joint action coordination in toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 203–220.Google Scholar
Mottet, D., Guiard, Y., Ferrand, T., & Bootsma, R. J. (2001). Two-handed performance of a rhythmical Fitts task by individuals and dyads. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6), 1275–1286.Google ScholarPubMed
Müller, B. C. N., Kühn, S., van Baaren, R. B., Dotsch, R., Brass, M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011). Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members’ actions. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecenka, N., & Keller, P. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G., & Dindo, H. (2011). What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Donnarumma, F., & Dindo, H. (2013). Human sensorimotor communication: A theory of signaling in online social interactions. PLoS One, 8(11), e79876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radke, S., de Lange, F., Ullsperger, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Mistakes that affect others: An fMRI study on processing of own errors in a social context. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Harrison, S. J., May, R., Kallen, R. W., & Schmidt, R. C. (2011). Self-organized complementary coordination: Dynamics of an interpersonal collision-avoidance task. BIO Web of Conferences, 1, 00075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 845–859.Google ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature, 2, 661–670.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M. E., & Goldstone, R. L. (2011). Adaptive group coordination and role differentiation. PLoS One, 6(7), e22377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruys, K. I., & Aarts, H. (2010). When competition merges people’s behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1130–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacheli, L., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E., Aglioti, S., & Candidi, M. (2013). Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 473–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santamaria, J. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2011). Etiquette and effort: Holding doors for others. Psychological Science, 22(5), 584–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, L., Becchio, C., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cues to intention: The role of movement information. Cognition, 119, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., Fitzpatrick, P., Caron, R., & Mergeche, J. (2011). Understanding social motor coordination. Human Movement Science, 30, 834–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Fuchs, A. & Jirsa, V. K. (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Stumpf, L., & Prinz, W. (2005b). Far from action blind: Representation of others’ actions in individuals with autism. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 433–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Sebanz, N. & Prinz, W. (2005a). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234–1246.Google Scholar
Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 308–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Bou, M. A. T., del Pobil, Á. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012). When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: Corepresentation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1073–1077.Google ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. N. (2002). The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, D. (2005). Let’s pretend! Children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Bullowa, M. (Ed.), Before speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 321–343.Google Scholar
Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015–2024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, J. C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Jing, J.-T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2006). A common coding framework in self–other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, J. C.-C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The GROOP effect: Groups mimic group actions. Cognition, 118, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 998–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Our actions in my mind: Motor imagery of joint action. Neuropsychologia, 55, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesper, C., & Richardson, M. J. (2014). Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 232(9), 2945–2956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Schmitz, L., Safra, L., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. Cognition, 153, 118–123.Google Scholar
Vesper, C., Soutschek, A., & Schubö, A. (2009). Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2418–2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: Reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013b). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 48–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114(3), 830–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(2), 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilf, E. (2013). Toward an anthropology of computer-mediated, algorithmic forms of sociality. Current Anthropology, 54(6), 716–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Guetzkow, H. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press, 177–190.Google Scholar
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 131–158.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratlavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berdahl, A., Torney, C. J., Ioannou, C. C., Faria, J. J., & Couzin, I. D. (2013). Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science, 339, 574–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Böckler, A., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2012). Effects of a co-actor’s focus of attention on task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1404–1415.Google Scholar
Burum, B., Karbowicz, D., & Gilbert, D. (2013). A good experience is better co-experienced. Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA, 17–19 January.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Decety, J. (2010). Social neuroscience and its relationship to social psychology. Social Cognition, 28(6), 675–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2013). Social neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 667–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1996). Being there: Putting brain, body, and the world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzin, I. (2007). Collective minds. Nature, 445, 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalmaso, M., Pavan, G., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. (2012). Social status gates social attention in humans. Biology Letters, 8, 450–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doerrfeld, A., Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2012). Expecting to lift a box together makes the box look lighter. Psychological Research, 76, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galantucci, B., & Sebanz, N. (2009). Joint action: Current perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, A. C., Chong, A., & Couzin, I. D. (2012a). The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians. Biology Letters, 8(4), 520–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, A. C., Hale, J. J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Garnier, S., Kacelnik, A., et al. (2012b). Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19), 7245–72506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, R. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2009). Collective behaviour. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 412–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gureckis, T. M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2006). Thinking in groups. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. New York: Guilford Press, 28–84.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 2, 96–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T., & Pittman, T. S. (2008). Motives of the human animal: Comprehending, managing, and sharing inner states. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 361–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2006). The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(3), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (1997). Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature, 387, 767–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, G., Tatler, B. W., & Cole, G. G. (2009). You look where I look! Effect of gaze cues on overt and covert attention in misdirection. Visual Cognition, 17, 925–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual, and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. A-6). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.Google Scholar
Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., & Aitsebaomo, A. P. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research, 25(7), 963–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 320–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, M. F., Tatkow, E. P., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The look of love: Gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science, 16, 236–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(2), 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as polarizer of attitudes. Journals of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Passer, M. W., & Smith, R. E. (2008). Psychology: The science of mind and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C. (2009). Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 420–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 1045–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007a). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Tomlinson, J. M. (2009). Conversation, gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context. Cognitive Science, 33, 1468–1482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D. C., & Gobel, M. S. (2015). Social Attention. In J. M. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of Attention (pp. 349–367). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Street, C. N., Tan, J. Y. M., Kirkham, N. Z., Hoover, M. A., & Cavanaugh, A. G. (2012). Joint perception: Gaze and social context. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007b). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 62–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J. P. (1958). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Harber, K. D., Stefanucci, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1246–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senju, A., & Johnson, M. H. (2009). Atypical eye contact in autism: Models, mechanisms and development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 1204–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, S. V. (2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Sherif, M. (1937). An experimental approach to the study of attitudes. Sociometry, 1, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326–332.Google ScholarPubMed
Shteynberg, G. (2010). A silent emergence of culture: The social tuning effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 683–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striano, T., & Reid, V. M. (2006). Social cognition in the first year. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 471–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 185–208.Google Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012a). Synchronous activity boosts compliance with requests to aggress. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 453–456.Google Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012b). Synchrony and destructive obedience. Social Influence, 7(2), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition, 48(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernieri, F. J. (1988). Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(2), 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M., & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 110–129. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.1.110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Reznick, J. S., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother–infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In Feldman, R. S. & Rime, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 401–432.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays in body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Rubber hand ‘feels’ what eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouquet, C. A., Gaurier, V., Shipley, T., Toussaint, L., & Blandin, Y. (2007). Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(5), 519–530. doi: 10.1080/02640410600946803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1996). Dynamic coordination of vocal and kinesic behavior in dyadic interaction: Methods, problems, and interpersonal outcomes. In Watt, J. H. & VanLear, C. A. (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 353–386.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1997). Behavioral and judged coordination in adult informal social interactions: Vocal and kinesic indicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaminade, T., Franklin, D. W., Oztop, E., & Cheng, G. (2005). Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artificial motion. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Development and Learning, 96–101. doi: 10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490951.Google Scholar
Chapple, C. C. (1940). A cabinet cubicle for infants, combining isolation with control of temperature and humidity. Journal of Pediatrics, 16(2), 215–219. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(40)80122-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Lakin, J. L. (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, W. S. (1980). The relation of interactional synchrony to cognitive and emotional processes. In Key, M. R. (Ed.), The relation of verbal and nonverbal behavior. The Hague: Mouton, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, W. S. (1982). Cultural microrhythms. In Davis, M. (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press, 53–76.Google Scholar
Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143(4), 338–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183(4120), 99–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kraemer, D. J., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 1383–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, F. (2013). Social cognition is not a special case, and the dark matter is more extensive than recognized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 415–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M. E. (Ed.) (1982). Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012). Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demos, A. P., Chaffin, R., Begosh, K. T., Daniels, J. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2012). Rocking to the beat: Effects of music and partner’s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 49–53. doi: 10.1037/a0023843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. M. H., Schöner, G., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1994a). Temporal stability of the action–perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment. Experimental Brain Research, 97(3), 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. M. H., Schöner, G., Giese, M. A., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1994b). Frequency dependence of the action–perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: Relative phase dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 71(6), 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PloS One, 5(8), e12166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E. ([1915] 1965). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2007). On the origins of background emotions: From affect synchrony to symbolic expression. Emotion, 7(3), 601–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., Magori-Cohen, R., Galili, G., Singer, M., & Louzoun, Y. (2011). Mother and infant coordinate heart rhythms through episodes of interaction synchrony. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(4), 569–577. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.06.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (2004). Four modes of constituting relationships: Consubstantial assimilation; space, magnitude, time, and force; concrete procedures; abstract symbolism. In Haslam, N. (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview. Abingdon: Psychology Press, 61–146.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In Merker, B., Wallin, N. L., & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 411–424.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammer, K., Honda, R., Schmitt, A., & Jütte, A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 487–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammer, K., Kruck, K. B., & Magnusson, M. S. (1998). The courtship dance: Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal behavior, 22(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, M. D. (1994). Synchronous and alternating choruses in insects and anurans: Common mechanisms and diverse functions. American Zoologist, 34(6), 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., Seder, J., & Kesebir, S. (2008). Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. Journal of Legal Studies, 37(2), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issartel, J., Marin, L., & Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: ‘Can we march to the beat of our own drum?’ Neuroscience Letters, 411(3), 174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., Brady, N., Cummins, F., & Monaghan, K. (2007). Interaction effects in simultaneous motor control and movement perception tasks. Artificial Intelligence Review, 26(1–2), 141–154. doi: 10.1007/s10462-007-9035-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32(2), 101–125. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 299–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Riediger, M., Schmiedek, F., von Oertzen, T., Li, S.-C., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Dyadic drumming across the lifespan reveals a zone of proximal development in children. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 632–644. doi: 10.1037/a0021818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kokal, I., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment – if the rhythm comes easy. PLos One, 6(11), e27272. doi: 27210.21371/journal.pone.0027272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2220–2230. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.497843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, M. (2005). Four themes in youth work practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 21–29. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupferberg, A., Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., & Brandt, T. (2011). Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. AI and Society, 26(4), 339–345. doi: 10.1007/s00146-010-0314-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, R. (2001). The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25(4), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M. (1985). Posture mirroring and intergroup orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(2), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M. (1990). The trouble with rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K., Richardson, M. J., Smith, C. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2012). Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 746–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K., & Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand-waving: Action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109(1), 152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marin, L., Issartel, J., & Chaminade, T. (2009). Interpersonal motor coordination: From human–human to human–robot interactions. Interaction Studies, 10(3), 479–504. doi: 10.1075/is.10.3.09mar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009a). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., Baron, R. M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2006). Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecological Psychology, 18(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009b). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 320–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masumoto, J., & Inui, N. (2013). Two heads are better than one: Both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. Journal of Neurophysiology, 109(5), 1307–1314. doi: 10.1152/jn.00776.2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McPhail, C., & Wohlstein, R. T. (1986). Collective locomotion as collective behavior. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merker, B. H., Madison, G. S., & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 45(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miall, R. C. (2003). Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. Neuroreport, 14(17), 2135–2137. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000098751.87269.77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, L. K., Lumsden, J., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioral synchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 495–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., and Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabási, A. L. (2000). The sound of many hands clapping: Tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. Nature, 403(6772), 849–850. doi: 10.1038/35002660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nessler, J. A., Kephart, G., Cowell, J., & De Leone, C. J. (2011). Varying treadmill speed and inclination affects spontaneous synchronization when two individuals walk side by side. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 27(4), 322–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newtson, D., Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J., & Cutino, S. (1987). The structure of action and interaction. Social Cognition, 5(3), 191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obhi, S. S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: Toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oullier, O., de Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 178–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oztop, E., Franklin, D. W., & Chaminade, T. (2005). Human–humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2(4), 537–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladino, M.-P., Mazzurega, M., Pavani, F., & Schubert, T. W. (2010). Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self–other boundaries. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1202–1207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, A. D., Iversen, J. R., Bregman, M. R., & Schulz, I. (2009). Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal. Current Biology, 19(10), 827–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013a). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, A., (2013b). Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2092–2102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, W. (1990). A common-coding approach to perception and action. In Neumann, O. & Prinz, W. (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 284–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PloS One, 8(8), e71182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H. (2006). Rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 163–181. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0053-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2004). Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms. Psychological Research, 68(4), 252–270. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0143-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(3), 403–452. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Campbell, W. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 449(2), 117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26(6), 867–891. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 62–79. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.62.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., Bienvenu, M., Fitzpatrick, P. A., & Amazeen, P. G. (1998). A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: Coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 884–900.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 227–247.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., Fitzpatrick, P., Caron, R., and Mergeche, J. (2011). Understanding social motor coordination. Human Movement Science, 30(5), 834–845. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., & O’Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9(3), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., Richardson, M. J., Arsenault, C., & Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 860–870. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.860.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Phase-entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements. Biological Cybernetics, 70(4), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, entrainment and coordination. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press, 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K., Baker, A. A., Richardson, M. J., & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 201–208. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.201.Google ScholarPubMed
Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 305–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326.Google ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A., & Decety, J. (2006). Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 915–926. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915.Google Scholar
Stel, M., & Vonk, R. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strogatz, S. H., Abrams, D. A., McRobie, A., Eckhardt, B., & Ott, E. (2005). Theoretical mechanics: Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge. Nature, 438(7064), 43–44. doi: 10.1038/43843a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Styns, F., van Noorden, L., Moelants, D., & Leman, M. (2007). Walking on music. Human Movement Science, 26(5), 769–785. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temprado, J.-J. (2004). Attentional load associated with performing and stabilizing a between-persons coordination of rhythmic limb movements. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.09.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(19), 8190–8195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611453104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsakiris, M. (2008). Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PloS One, 3(12), e4040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J. C., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432(2), 88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vacharkulksemsuk, T., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 399–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11(2), 262–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. A. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693–695. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., et al. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. doi: 10.1037/a0029333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, K. (2008). Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements. Cognition, 106(3), 1514–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). Synchronous activity boosts compliance with requests to aggress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bigand, E., McAdams, S., & Forêt, S. (2000). Divided attention in the listening of polyphonic music. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, M., & Davidson, J. W. (2007). An exploration of the effects of musical and social factors in piano duo collaborations. Psychology of Music, 35(2), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregman, A. S., & Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 244–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaffin, R., Imreh, G., & Crawford, M. (2002). Practicing perfection: Memory and piano performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarPubMed
Chaffin, R., Lemieux, A. F., & Chen, C. (2007). ‘It is different each time I play’: Variability in highly prepared musical performance. Music Perception, 24(5), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffin, R., & Logan, T. (2006). Practicing perfection: How concert soloists prepare for performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, E. S., Kraemer, D. J., Hamilton, A. F., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19(2), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Ausilio, A. (2007). The role of the mirror system in mapping complex sounds into actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(22), 5847–5848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J. W. (2009). Movement and collaboration in musical performance. In Hallam, S., Cross, I., & Thaut, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 364–376.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. W., & Good, J. M. M. (2002). Social and musical co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music, 30(2), 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. W., & King, E. C. (2004). Strategies for ensemble practice. In A. Williamon (Ed.), Enhancing musical performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105–122.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, M. T., Janata, P., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Leading the follower: An fMRI investigation of dynamic cooperativity and leader–follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. NeuroImage, 84, 688–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friberg, A., & Battel, G. U. (2002). Structural communication. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In Deutsch, D (Ed.), The psychology of music. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 501–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, J., Chaffin, R., & Nicholson, G. (2006). Shared performance cues in singing and conducting: A content analysis of talk during practice. Psychology of Music, 34, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowinski, D., et al. (2010). Multi-scale entropy analysis of dominance in social creative activities. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia International Conference, Firenze, Italy, 1035–1038.Google Scholar
Glowinski, D., (2013). The movements made by performers in a skilled quartet a distinctive pattern, and then the function it serves. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception, 26(5), 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, E. (2002). Ensemble performance. In J. Rink (Ed.), Musical performance: A guide to understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haruno, M., Wolpert, D., & Kawato, M. (2001). Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Computation, 13(10), 2201–2220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haueisen, J., & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activation in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 786–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herholz, S. C., & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: Behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76(3), 486–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurley, S. (2008). The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(1), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Idil, K., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment – if the rhythm comes easily. PloS One, 6(11), e27272.Google Scholar
Ito, M. (2008). Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 9(4), 304–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janata, P., Tillmann, B., & Bharucha, J. J. (2002). Listening to polyphonic music recruits domain-general attention and working memory circuits. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103–S109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 718–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. E. (1999). Attending in complex musical interactions: The adaptive dual role of meter. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. E. (2001). Attentional resource allocation in musical ensemble performance. Psychology of Music, 29, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In Morganti, F, Carassa, A, & Riva, G (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 205–221.Google Scholar
Keller, P. E. (2012). Mental imagery in music performance: Underlying mechanisms and potential benefits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 206–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In Fabian, D, Timmers, R, & Schubert, E (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across styles and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 260–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. E., & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of body movements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. E., & Burnham, D. K. (2005). Musical meter in attention to multipart rhythm. Music Perception, 22, 629–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. E., Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and cognition, 16(1), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. E., & Repp, B. H. (2008). Multilevel coordination stability: Integrated goal representations in simultaneous intra-personal and inter-agent coordination. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 378–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130394.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Advances in research and theory. London: Academic Press, 59–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427(6971), 244–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lahav, A., Saltzman, E., & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(2), 308–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, A. C., & Ericsson, K. A. (1998). Preparation of a public piano performance: The relation between practice and performance. Musicae Scientiae, 2, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loehr, J. D. (2013). Sensory attenuation for jointly produced action effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehr, J. D., Kourtis, D., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehr, J. D., & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153–2167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, J. (2012). Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRitchie, J., Buck, B., & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. Musicae Scientiae, 17(1), 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchini, M., Papiotis, P., & Maestre, E. (2012). Timing synchronization in string quartet performance: A preliminary study. In Barthet, M. & Dixon, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval (CMMR). London: Queen Mary University of London, 177–185.Google Scholar
Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology, 42(6), 668–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision-making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 510–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noorden, L. van. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Eindhoven: Institute for Perception Research.Google Scholar
Novembre, G., Ticini, L. C. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action: Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2894–2903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novembre, G., Ticini, L. C. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1062–1068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowicki, L., Prinz, W., Grosjean, M., Repp, B. H., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Mutual adaptive timing in interpersonal action coordination. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 23(1), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusseck, M., & Wanderley, M. M. (2009). Music and motion: How music-related ancillary body movements contribute to the experience of music. Music Perception, 26(4), 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, F. T. P., MacDonald, J. J., & Goodman, D. (2007). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate cortex is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action–outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1994–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacherie, E. (2012). The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. joint-agency. In Seemann, A (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments, Vol. 93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 343–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, C., & Loehr, J. D. (2013). Meeting of two minds in duet piano performance. In Bernstein, L. F. & Rozin, A. (Eds.), Musical implications: Essays in honor of Eugene Narmour. Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 323–338.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Candidi, M., Dindo, H., & Barca, L. (2013). Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(3), 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips-Silver, J., & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musical interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, H. E., & Byo, J. L. (2002). Rehearsing and conducting. In Parncutt, R. & McPherson, G. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of musical performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragert, M., Fairhurst, M. T., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Segregation and integration of auditory streams when listening to multi-part music. PloS One, 9(1), e84085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ragert, M., Schroeder, T., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Knowing too little or too much: The effects of familiarity with a co-performer’s part on interpersonal coordination in musical ensembles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H. (1995). Expressive timing in Schumann’s ‘Träumerei:’ An analysis of performances by graduate student pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 2413–2427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminary experiments. Music Perception, 14(4), 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H. (1998). A microcosm of musical expression. I. Quantitative analysis of pianists’ timing in the initial measures of Chopin’s Etude in E Major. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(2), 1085–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H. (2002). The embodiment of musical structure: Effects of musical context on sensorimotor synchronization with complex timing patterns. In Prinz, W & Hommel, B (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H., & Keller, P. E. (2010). Self versus other in piano performance: Detectability of timing perturbations depends on personal playing style. Experimental Brain Research, 202(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sänger, J., Lindenberger, U., & Müller, V. (2011). Interactive brains, social minds. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 4, 655–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satoh, M., Takeda, K. Nagata, K. Hatazawa, J., & Kuzuhara, S. (2001). Activated brain regions in musicians during an ensemble: A PET study. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Psychology, 2nd edition. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schütz-Bosbach, S., Avenanti, A., Aglioti, S. M. & Haggard, P. (2009). Don’t do it! Cortical inhibition and self-attribution during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1215–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz-Bosbach, S., Mancini, B., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2006). Self and other in the human motor system. Current Biology, 16(18), 1830–1834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234–1246.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. S., & Alain, C. (2007). Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 780–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, M.C. van der, & Keller, P. (2013). The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 253.Google ScholarPubMed
Trusheim, W. H. (1991). Audiation and mental imagery: Implications for artistic performance. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 2, 138–147.Google Scholar
Uhlig, M., Fairhurst, M. T., & Keller, P. E. (2013). The importance of integration and top-down salience when listening to complex multi-part musical stimuli. NeuroImage, 77, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., Butterfill, S. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 998–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, C., Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2014). Agency in the sensorimotor system and its relation to explicit action awareness. Neuropsychologia, 52, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamon, A., & Davidson, J. W. (2002). Exploring co-performer communication. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 338–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 8(7), 547–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×