Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:43:59.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2022

Michal Ephratt
Michal Ephratt
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Silence as Language
Verbal Silence as a Means of Expression
 , pp. 335 - 350
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd-Alkareem, Massalha, 2005, The Agentive Passive Construction in English and Its Translation into Arabic, MA thesis, Haifa: University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Adell, Jordi, Bonafonte, Antonio, and Escudero, David, 2007, ‘Filled pauses in speech synthesis: Towards conversational speech’, in Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue, LNCS 4629, Plzen: Springer, pp. 358–365.Google Scholar
Adler, Silvia, 2007, ‘Silence and the French connection’, in Michal, Ephratt (ed.), Silences: Silence in Culture and in Interpersonal Relations, Tel-Aviv: Resling Publishing, pp. 177–191 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Adler, Silvia, 2015, ‘Liaisons “non marquées” de prédications dans l’accroche publicitaire’, Langages, 200: 121–136.Google Scholar
Al-George, Sergiu, 1967, ‘The semiosis of zero according to Panini’, East and West, 17(102): 115–124.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith and Burridge, Kate, 2006, Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Robert, 1981, The Art of Biblical Narrative, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Amir, Dana 2008, ‘Naming the nonexistent: Melancholia as mourning over a possible object’, Psychoanalytic Review, 95(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Amir, Dana 2014, Cleft Tongue: The Language of Psychic Structure (translation: Hadar, Mirjam), London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Amir, Dana 2016, ‘When language meets traumatic lacuna: The metaphoric, the metonymic, and the psychotic modes of testimony’, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 36(8): 620–632.Google Scholar
Ardrey, Robert, 1970, The Social Contract, London: Collins.Google Scholar
Arlow, Jacob A., 1961, ‘Silence and the theory of technique’, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 9: 44–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol and Sandler, Wendy, 2004, ‘Morphological universals and the sign language type’, in Geert, Booij and Jaap, van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 19–39, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2900-2904_2.Google Scholar
Austin, John L., 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Marina, Sbisà and Urmson, J. O. (eds.) (2nd edition), [1975], Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Sidney J., 1955, ‘The theory of silences’, The Journal of General Psychology, 53: 145–167, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1955.9710142.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M., 1984, Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (translation: Emerson, Caryl), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bar-On, Dan, 1995, Fear and Hope: Three Generations of the Holocaust, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Basso, Keith H., 1972, ‘“To give up on words”: Silence in Western Apache culture’, in Giglioli, Pier P. (ed.), Language and Social Context, London: Penguin Books, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine, 2001, ‘Tarquin dispossessed: Expropriation and consent in the Rape of Lucrece’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 52(3): 315–335.Google Scholar
Ben-Porat, Ziva, 1976, ‘The poetics of literary allusion’, PTL: Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 1: 105–128.Google Scholar
Ben-Ze’ev, Efrat, Ginio, Ruth and Winter, Jay (eds.), 2010, Shadows of War: A Social History of Silence in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile, 1974, ‘La blasphémie et l’euphémie’, in Benveniste, Émile, Problèmes de linguistic général, Paris: Gaillimard, II, pp. 254–257.Google Scholar
Berezowski, Leszek, 2009, The Myth of the Zero Article, London and New York: Continuum, http://ezproxy.haifa.ac.il/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=283768&site=ehost-live&scope (online resource, accessed 10 November 2018).Google Scholar
Berg Michael, Vande, 1987, ‘“Pictures of pronunciation”: Typographical travels through Tristram Shandy and Jacques le Fataliste’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 21(1): 21–47.Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack, 1994, ‘Constituting silence: Life in the world of total meaning’, Semiotica, 98(1/2): 73–88.Google Scholar
Bion, Wilfred R., 1959, ‘Attacks on linking’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 40: 308–315.Google Scholar
Bion, Wilfred R., 1970, Attention and Interpretation: A Scientific Approach to Insight in Psycho-analysis and Groups, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Blackmur, Robert P., 1957, ‘The language of silence’, in Ansher, Ruth N. (ed.), Language: An Inquiry into Its Meaning and Function, Vol. viii, New York: Harper and Row, pp. 134–152.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard, 1933, Language, [1954] New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, 1987, ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?’, Journal of Pragmatics, 11: 131–146.Google Scholar
Bobgan, Martin and Bobgan, Deidre, 1979, The Psychological Way, Minneapolis: Bethany Fellowship.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina, 2010, ‘“Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of other’s talk’, Discourse Studies, 12(1): 5–32.Google Scholar
Bréal, Michel and Jules, Alfred, 1877, Mélanges de mythologie et de linguistique, Paris: Librairie Hachette, Cambridge University Press (online publication date: October 2014), https://doi-org.ezproxy.haifa.ac.il/10.1017/CBO9781139839181.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen, 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rogers and Gilman, Albert, 1960, ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language, New York: Wiley, pp. 253–277.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas J., 1973, ‘Communicative silences: Forms and functions’, The Journal of Communication, 23: 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin, 1932, ‘Dialogue’, in Biemann, Asher D. (ed.), 2002, The Martin Buber Reader: Essential Writing, New York: Palgrave, pp. 189–205.Google Scholar
Budden, Mark and Horne, Ann (eds.), 2017, ‘Clinical commentary’, British Journal of Psychotherapy, 33(4): 442–455.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl, 1937, Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprach, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Cage, John, 1961, Silence: Lectures and Writings, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Canfield, Bruce, 2002, Johnson Rifles and Machine Guns: The Story of Melvin Maynard Johnson, Woonsocket, RI : Andrew Mowbray Pub.Google Scholar
Caruth, Cathy, 2001, ‘Parting words: Trauma, silence and survival’, Journal for Cultural Research, 5(1): 7–26.Google Scholar
Casas Gómez, Miguel, 2018, ‘Lexicon, discourse and cognition: Terminological delimitations in the conceptualizations of linguistic taboo’, in Andrea, Pizarro Pedraza (ed.), Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Castelfranchi, Cristiano and Guerini, Marco, 2007, ‘Is it a promise or a threat?’, Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(2): 277–311.Google Scholar
Ceramella, Nick, 2014, ‘“Silence Symphony” conducted by Pinter and Eduardo, two world theatre maestri’, in Tomaž, Onic (ed.), Harold Pinter on International Stages, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford and Vienna: Peter Lang, pp. 31–51.Google Scholar
Cherry, Shai, 2007, Torah through Time: Understanding Bible Commentary from the Rabbinic Period to Modern Times, Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Chilton, Randolph and Gilbertson, Carol, 1990, ‘Pound’s “‘Metro’ Hokku”: The evolution of an image’, Twentieth Century Literature, 36(2): 225–236.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, 1972, Language and Mind (2nd edition), New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures (3rd revised edition), [1984], Dordrecht and Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Chovanec Jan, 2003, ‘The uses of the present tense in headlines’, in Jan, Chovanec (ed.), Theory and Practice in English Studies, Brno: Czech Republic Masaryk University, I, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
Clark, David R., 1977, ‘After “silence”, the “supreme theme”: Eight lines of Yeats’, in Joseph, Ronsley (ed.), Myth and Reality in Irish Literature, Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 149–174.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne, 2006, Just Silence: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelis, Louise H., 1997, Passive and Perspective, Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, van Henk, 2001, ‘Semi-lexical Categories’, in Norbert, Corver and van Henk, Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical Categories: The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, Charles, 1916. The Empire of Silence, New York: Sturgis and Walton.Google Scholar
Crumbley, Paul, 1992, ‘Dickinson’s Dashes and the Limits of Discourse’, The Emily Dickinson Journal, 1(2): 8–29.Google Scholar
Crystal, David and Quirk, Randolph, 1964, Systems of Prosodic and Paralinguistic Features in English, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dauenhauer, Bernard P., 1980, Silence: The Phenomenon and Its Ontological Significance, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Robert Con., 1991, ‘Freud, Lacan, and the subject of cultural studies’, College Literature, 18(2): 22–37.Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand, 1913 , Course in General Linguistics (translated and annotated: Roy, Harris), [1983/1993], London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand, 2006, Writing in General Linguistics, Simon, Bouquet, Rudolf, Engler, Carol, Sanders and Pires, Matthew, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Zutter, Hank, 1993, Who Says a Dog Goes Bow-wow?, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Didier, Franck, 2012, Nietzsche and the Shadow of God (translation: Farah, Philippe), Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Doležel, Lubomir, 1983, ‘Proper names, definite descriptions and the intensional structure of Kafka’s “The Trial”’, Poetics, 12: 511–526.Google Scholar
Dressen, Dacia F., 2002, ‘Identifying textual silence in scientific research articles: Recontextualizations of the field account in geology’, Hermes, 28: 81–107.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U., 1987, ‘Word formation as part of natural morphology’, in Dressler, Wolfgang U., Mayerthaler, Willi, Pangal, Oswald and Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (eds.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 99–126.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Karpf, Annemarie, 1994, ‘The theoretical relevance of pre- and protomorphology in language acquisition’, in Geert, Booij and Jaap, VanMarle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel, Richard M., Rozelle and James C., Baxter, 1982, Nonverbal Communication: Survey, Theory and Research, Beverly Hills: Sage Library.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Bart, 1996, ‘When language stops … Suspension points in the poetry of Hart Crane and Wallace Stevens’, in Grabher, Gudrun M. and Jeßner, Ulrike (eds.), Semantics of Silence in Linguistics and Literature, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, pp. 257–270.Google Scholar
Elder, Chi-Hé and Savva, Eleni, 2018, ‘Incomplete conditionals and the syntax–pragmatics interface’, Journal of Pragmatics, 138: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2012, ‘“We try harder”: Silence and Grice’s cooperative principle, maxims and implicatures’, Language and Communication, 32: 62–79.Google Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2014a, ‘Grice’s cooperative principle in the psychoanalytic setting’, The Psychoanalytic Review, 101(6): 815–845.Google Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2014b, ‘A model is born – Presenting the derivation in Modern Hebrew’, Hebrew Studies, 55: 129–170.Google Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2015a, ‘What’s in no-name?’, Onomstica Canadiana, 94(1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2015b, ‘The minute of silence as solidarity and individuation: A conceptual model of an Israeli ritual’, Journal of Ritual Studies, 29(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2016, ‘Verbal silence as figure: Its contribution to linguistic theory’, Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 52(1): 511–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ephratt, Michal, 2017, ‘Wondering about silence: Considerations from over fifty translations of Goethe’s “Wandrers Nachtlied II” into Hebrew’, Hebrew Studies, 58: 201–242.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, 2007, ‘Insubordination and its uses’, in Irina, Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 366–431.Google Scholar
Fanshel, David and Moss, Freda, 1971, Playback: A Marriage in Jeopardy Examined, New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ferenczi, Sandor, 1911, ‘On obscene words: Contribution to the psychology of the latent period’, in Sex in Psychoanalysis (translation: Jones, Ernest), [1965], New York: Dover Publications, pp. 112–130.Google Scholar
Fernando, A. C., 2006, ‘A case study – Tata Steel: A company that also makes steel’, in Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies and Practices, New Delhi, India: Pearson Education, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Joanne M., 2008, Nefarious Crimes, Contested Justice: Illicit Sex and Infanticide in the Republic of Venice, 1557–1789, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, 1968, ‘The case for case’, in Emmon, Bach and Harms, R. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
Fineman, Joel, 1991, ‘Shakespeare’s will: The temporality of rape’, in The Subjectivity Effect in Western Literary Tradition: Essays toward the Release of Shakespeare’s Will, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 165–221.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L. and Yoshida, Teigo, 1968, ‘The nature of speech according to Japanese proverbs’, Journal of American Folklore, 81: 34–43.Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark, David L., Franklin and Jerrold M., Post, 2014, ‘Executive dysfunction, brain aging, and political leadership’, Politics Life Science, 33(2): 93–102.Google Scholar
Foxwell, A. K. (ed.), 1913, The poems of Sir Thomas Wiat: Edited from the Mss. and Early Editions, London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, Morris, 1958, ‘The seven sins of technical writing’, College Composition and Communication, 9(1): 10–16.Google Scholar
Freeman, Margaret H., 1996, ‘Emily Dickinson and the discourse of intimacy’, in Gudrun, M. Grabher and Ulrike, Jeßner (eds.), Semantics of Silences in Linguistics and Literature, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
Freeman, Margaret H., 1997, ‘Grounded spaces: Deictic-self anaphors in the poetry of Emily Dickinson’, Language and Literature, 6(1): 7–28.Google Scholar
Freitas, Elsa Simões Lucas, 2018, Taboo and Advertising, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Freud, Anna, 1923, ‘The relation of beating-phantasies to a day-dream’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 4: 89–102.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1900, ‘The interpretation of dreams’, SE 4/5: 1–630.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1913, ‘Totem and taboo’, SE 13: 1–162.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1915, ‘Thoughts for the times on war and death’, SE 14: 273–300.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1917, ‘Mourning and melancholia’, SE 14: 237–58.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1919a, ‘A child is being beaten’, SE 17: 175–204.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1919b, ‘Ein kind wird geschlagen’, Gesammelte Werke 7: 197–226.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1920, ‘Beyond the pleasure principle’, SE 18: 1–64.Google Scholar
Frey, Charles, 1976, ‘Interpreting “Western Wind”’, ELH: English Literature History, 43(3): 259–278.Google Scholar
Gerzi, Shmuel, 2007, ‘What do silences express in the psychoanalytic process?’, in Ephratt, Michal (ed.), Silences: Silence in Culture and in Interpersonal Relations, Tel-Aviv: Resling, pp. 137–160 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Gifford, Don, 1982, Joyce Annotated: Notes for Dubliners and a Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilead, Amihud, 2008, ‘How few words can the shortest story have?’, Philosophy and Literature, 32: 119–129.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy, 1993, English Grammar: A Functional Based Introduction, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving, 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving, 1981, Forms of Talk, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jay, 2005, ‘Conflict in the middle voice’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 74(1): 105–120.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H., 1963, ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 73–113.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, 2016, ‘Introduction to Hamlet’, in Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Gosset, Suzanne, Howard, Jean E., Maus, Katharine Eisaman and McMullan, Gordon (eds.), The Norton Shakespeare (3rd edition), New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 1181–1188.Google Scholar
Gregerson, Linda, 2013, ‘Open voicing: Wyatt and Shakespeare’, in Post, Jonathan (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare’s Poetry, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–67.Google Scholar
Gregory, Adrian, 1994, The Silence of Memory Armistice Day 1919–1946, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H., 1989, Studies in the Ways of Words, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, 1983, ‘Iconic and economic motivation’, Language, 59(4): 781–819.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, 1985, ‘Symmetry’, in Haiman, John (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 73–95.Google Scholar
Hall, Donald, 1957, Writing Well, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., 1985, Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition), London and New York: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya, 1976, Cohesion in English, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hamill, Sam, 1999, ‘Translator’s introduction’, in Bashō, Matsuo and Hamill, Sam, The Essential Bashō, Boston and London: Shambhala, pp. ix–xxxi.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S., 1951, Methods in Structural Linguistics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Matthew, 1856, Rise, Progress, and Present Structure of the English Language, Philadelphia: E. C. and J. Biddle.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, 2004, ‘Coordinating constructions: An overview’, in Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating Constructions, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Hassan, Ihab, 1967, The Literature of Silence: Henry Miller and Samuel Beckett, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A., 1978, Definiteness and Indefiniteness, London: Croom Helm and Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A., 1991, ‘On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction’, Journal of Linguistics, 27(2): 405–442.Google Scholar
Hejinian, Lyn, 2000, The Language of Inquiry, Berkeley: University of California Press, http://ezproxy.haifa.ac.il/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=66018&site=ehost-live&scope=site (accessed 27 March 2018).Google Scholar
Hejinian, Lyn, 2005, ‘I am suddenly aware that phrases happen’, Lyn Hejinian at Kelly Writers House, 22 February 2005, https://jacket2.org/interviews/i-am-suddenly-aware-phrases-happen (accessed 25 March 2018).Google Scholar
Hejinian, Lyn, 2007, ‘LH’, in The Grand Piano: An Experiment in Collective Autobiography, San Francisco 1975–1980, Detroit, Part 3, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G., 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hewson, John, 1972, Article and Noun in English, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hewson, John, 1997, Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages: Theory, Typology, Diachrony, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hiz, Henry, 1962, ‘Questions and answers’, Journal of Philosophy, 59(10): 253–265.Google Scholar
Holinshed, Raphael, Hooker, John, Thynne, Francis, Fleming, Abraham, Stow, John and Ellis, Sir Henry (eds.), 1808, Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, London: J. Johnson et al., Vol. iv HeinOnline, https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.haifa.ac.il/HOL/P?h=hein.cow/holceni0004&i=572 (accessed 20 November 2019).Google Scholar
Holland, Theodore J. Jr., 1990, ‘The many faces of nicknames’, Names, 38(4): 255–272.Google Scholar
Horobin, Simon, 2012, ‘The language of Chaucer’, in Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 567–588.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, 2007, English Mediopassive Constructions: A Cognitive, Corpus-based Study of Their Origin, Spread, and Current Status, Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R., 2014, Origins of Language: A Slim Guide, Oxford: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hydén, Margareta, 2005, ‘“I must have been an idiot to let it go on”: Agency and positioning in battered women’s narratives of leaving’, Feminism and Psychology, 15(2): 169–188.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, 1937, ‘Zero sign’, in Waugh, Linda R. and Morris, Halle (eds.), 1984, Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931–1981, Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 151–160.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, 1960, ‘Concluding statement: Linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language, New York: Wiley, pp. 350–377.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, 1993, The Power of Silence: Social and Pragmatic Perspectives, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, 1997, ‘“White and white” metacommunicative and metaphorical silences’, in Jaworski, Adam (ed.), Silence Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 381–401.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, 1998, ‘The silence of power and solidarity in Fallen Sons’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 33: 141–152.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, 2006, ‘Silence’, in Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 377–379.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Fitzgerald, Richard and Constantinou, Odysseas, 2005, ‘Busy saying nothing new: Live silence in TV reporting of 9/11’, Multilingua, 24: 121–144.Google Scholar
Jensen, Vernon J., 1973, ‘Communicative functions of silence’, ETCA Review of General Semantics, 30: 249–257.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto, 1922, Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin, [1949], New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto, 1924, The Philosophy of Grammar, [1935], London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto, 1949, A Modern English Grammar, [1961], London: George Allen & Unwin and Copenhagen: Munksgaard, Part 7: Syntax.Google Scholar
Johansen, J. D., 1996, ‘Iconicity in literature’, Semiotica, 110: 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Lesley, 1984, The Language of Silence: On the Unspoken and Unspeakable in Modern Drama, Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Kasher, Asa, 1976, ‘Conversational maxims and rationality’, in Asa, Kasher (ed.), Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems, Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard, 1977, ‘Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1): 63–99.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Dryer, Matthew S., 2007, ‘Passive in the world’s languages’, in Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (2nd edition), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–361.Google Scholar
Kelly Seam, James, 2016, ‘Staging nothing: The figure of Das Ding in Poe’s “The Raven”’, The Edgar Allan Poe Review, 17(2): 116–141.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne, 1993, The Middle Voice, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kenaan, Hagi, 2001, ‘Kierkegaard and the language of silence’, in Siegfried, Jäkel and Asko, Timonen (eds.), The Language of Silence, Turku: Turun Yliopisto, pp. 249–258.Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh, 1971, The Pound Era, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran, 2002, ‘Must down: On non-occurring verbs of motion in modern English’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 1(2): 339–353.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. and Bellugi, Ursula, 1976, ‘Poetry and song in a language without sound’, Cognition, 4: 45–97.Google Scholar
Koffka, Kurt, 1935, Principles of Gestalt Psychology, [1963], New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, Elena, 2017, ‘Elide me bare: Null arguments in asl’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(2): 397–446.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, 1966 ‘The bounded text’, in Roudiez, Leon S. (ed.), Desire in Language (translation: Th. Gora, A. Jardine and Roudiez, L. S.), [1980], New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 36–63.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, 1968, ‘Poésie et négativité’, L’Homme, 8(2): 36–63.Google Scholar
Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth, 1998, The Wheel of Life: A Memoir of Living and Dying, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis, 1998, Discourse of Silence, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.49.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis, 2007, ‘Towards a typology of silence’, Journal of Pragmatics, 39: 1673–1688.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, 1956, ‘The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis’, in Lacan, Jacques, [1966], Écrits (translation: Sheridan, Alan), London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 33–125.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, 1963, ‘Introduction to the names-of-the-father’, in Lacan, Jacques, [2013], On the Names-of-the-Father (translation: Fink, Bruce), Cambridge: Polity, pp. 51–91.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, 1988, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book I. Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953–1954 (translation: Forrester, John), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leathers, Dale G., 1997, Successful Nonverbal Communication (3rd edition), Boston and London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., 1983, Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B., 1963, The Grammar of English Nominalizations, [1966], The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levi, Margot P., 1966, ‘K., an exploration of the names of Kafka’s central characters’, Names, 14: 1–10.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo, 1958, Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity (translation: Woolf, Stuart), [1986], New York: Touchstone Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian, 1985, ‘Definites’, Journal of Semantics, 4: 279–326.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Rudolph, 1957, ‘Contribution to the psychoanalytic theory of masochism’, Journal of the American Psycho-analytic Association, 5(2): 197–234.Google Scholar
Lyons, John, 1977, Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, P. Jackson, 2014, Determining the Shakespeare Canon: Arden of Faversham and a Lover’s Complaint, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magill, Frank N., 2015, Cyclopedia of Literary Characters (revised 4th edition, original editions edited by Magill, Frank N.). Ipswich, MA: Salem Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Martha R., 1991, ‘Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation’, Michigan Law Review, 90(1): 20–94.Google Scholar
Malandro, Loretta A., Barker, Larry L. and Barker, Deborah A., 1989, Nonverbal Communication (2nd edition), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Martinet, André, 1949, ‘George Kingsley Zipf, human behavior and the principle of least effort’, Word, 5: 280–282.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael and Schiffrin, Deborah, 2015, ‘Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context’, in Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E. and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edition), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 189–221.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H., 1954, Motivation and personality (2nd edition), [1970], New York and London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi, 1987, ‘System independent morphological naturalness’, in Mayerthaler, Willi, Pangal, Oswald and Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (eds.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 25–58.Google Scholar
McGregor, Rafe, 2015, ‘Literary thickness’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 55(3): 343–360.Google Scholar
McGrew, Timothy, 2011, ‘Evidence’, in Bernecker, Sven and Pritchard, Duncan (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, New York: Routledge, pp. 58–67.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert, 1972, Nonverbal Communication, Piscataway and Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Melčuk, Igor A., 1976, ‘On suppletion’, Linguistics, 170: 45–90.Google Scholar
Melčuk, Igor A., 1979, ‘Syntactic, or lexical, zero in natural language’, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 224–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls (accessed 19 August 2018).Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason, 2001, The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettinger, Tryggve N. D., 1988, In Search of God: The Meaning and Message of the Everlasting Names (translation: Cryer, Frederick H.), Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, 1843, A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, [1973], Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Vol. vii, Book 1.Google Scholar
Miller, Cristanne, 1987, Emily Dickinson: A Poet’s Grammar, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mirfield, Peter, 1997, Silence, Confession and Improperly Obtained Evidence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mirus, Gene, Fisher, Jami and Napoli, Donna Jo, 2012, ‘Taboo expressions in American sign language’, Lingua, 122(9): 1004–1020.Google Scholar
Montefiore, Simon Sebag, 2007, Speeches that Changed the World, London: Quercus.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jane, O’Neill, Christopher and Harré, Rom, 1979, Nicknames, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nänny, Max, 1999, ‘Alphabetic letters as icons in literary texts’, in Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 73–198.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo and Hoeksema, Jack, 2009, ‘The grammatical versatility of taboo terms’, Studies in Language, 33(3): 612–643.Google Scholar
Naveh, Hanna, 1993, Captives of Mourning, Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz-Hemeuchad (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina and Sandler, Wendy, 1999, ‘Prosody in Israeli sign language’, Language & Speech, 42(2–3): 143–176.Google Scholar
Neumann, Boaz, 2010, Die Weltanschauung des Nazismus–Raum, Körper, Sprache, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, Elizabeth, 1974, ‘The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion’, Journal of Communication, 24: 43–51.Google Scholar
Nofal Khalil, Hassan, 2011, ‘Passive voice as an inimitable linguistic phenomenon in the Holy Qur’an’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(18): 148–168.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Daniel C. and Kowal, Sabine, 2004, ‘The history of research on the filled pause as evidence of the written language bias in linguistics’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(6): 459–474.Google Scholar
Oed online, The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition), http://dictionary.oed.com Entries are indicated by ‘oed’ followed by the Oed’s lexical entry, its category, and the meaning’s number and letter (the entries were accessed between December 2010 and June 2020).Google Scholar
Ogden, Thomas H., 1989, The Primitive Edge of Experience, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Ogden, Thomas H., 2001, Conversations at the Frontier of Dreaming, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Olinick, Stanley L., 1982. ‘Meanings beyond words: Psychoanalytic perception of silence and communication, happiness, sexual love and death’, International Review Psycho-Analysis, 9: 461–472.Google Scholar
Oremland, Jerome D., 1983, ‘Death and transformation in Hamlet’, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 3: 485–512.Google Scholar
Orwell, George, 1946, ‘Politics and the English language’, in Orwell, George, [1950], Shooting an Elephant, New York: Harcourt Brace, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Pane, Greta L., 2017, ‘The unreal path to a real place: Six strategies of representation in the novels of Thomas Hardy’, Style, 51(1): 52–75.Google Scholar
Pavel, Khoroshikh, 2014, ‘Fonetic symbolism in the E. Jandl’s work “schtzngrmm”’, Евразийский Союз Ученых (ЕСУ), 4: 46–47, https://istina.msu.ru/media/publications/article/fc3/641/7028116/2014–2007–25_Strelets_I.E._Sovremennyie_kontseptsii…_Evrazijskij_Soyuz_Uchenyih_Chast_11_4–2014_S._158–162.pdf (accessed 6 February 2018).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1965. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peraldo, Emmanuelle, 2016, ‘“I shall not concern the union in this discourse”: Preterition and engagement in pro-unionist writing by Daniel Defoe, traveler to Scotland’, E-rea, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.4000/erea.5582 (accessed 19 August 2020).Google Scholar
Peters, Heinz F., 1962, My Sister, My Spouse: Lou Andreas-Salomé’s Biography, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pfau, Ronald and Quer, Joseph, 2010, ‘Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles’, in Brentari, Diane (ed.). Sign Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–402.Google Scholar
Plett, Heinrich F., 1991, ‘Intertextualities’, in Plett, Heinrich F. (ed.), Intertextuality, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Poe, Edgar Allen, 1846, ‘The philosophy of composition’, www.gutenberg.org/5/5/7/4/55749/ (accessed 3 July 2020).Google Scholar
Polykoff, Shirley, 2016, ‘Does she … or doesn’t she? The making of Miss Clairol hair coloring’, Advertising & Society Review, 16(4), https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2016.0001 (accessed 19 June 2019).Google Scholar
Pound, Ezra, 1914, ‘Vorticism’, in Zinnes, Harriet (ed.), [1980], Ezra Pound and the Visual Arts, New York: New Directions, pp. 199–209.Google Scholar
Poyatos, Fernando, 2002. Nonverbal Communication across Disciplines, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Poyatos, Fernando, 2017, Literary Thesaurus of Nonverbal Communication: A Tool for Interdisciplinary Research, editorial académica Española.Google Scholar
Prasad, Joshi P., 2009, Vedic Aorist and Panini, Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl H., 1971, Languages of the Brain: Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan, 1985, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radday, Yehuda Thomas, 1990, ‘On missing the humour in the Bible’, in Radday, Yehuda T. and Brenner, Athalya (eds.), On Humour and the Comic in the Hebrew Bible, Sheffield: Almond Press, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter and Matthis, Elizabeth, 2002, ‘Why similar to, but different from?’, in Cuychens, Hubert and Raddan, Günter (eds.), Perspectives on Prepositions, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 231–257.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew, 1988, Transformational Grammar: A First Course, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raufman, Ravit and Ben-Cnaan, Rachel, 2011, ‘Cursed by magic spell, cured by silence: A discussion on the functions of speech and silence in the Sephardic version “The Sister Who Turned Her Brothers into Goats” and its Grimm parallel “The Twelve Brothers”’, El-Prezente – Study in Sephardic Culture, 5: 139–157.Google Scholar
Raz, Jacob, 2010, ‘Kill the Buddha: Quietism in action and quietism as action in Zen Buddhism thought and practice’, Common Knowledge, 16(3): 439–456.Google Scholar
Redholz, R. A. (ed.), 1978, Sir Thomas Wyatt: The Complete Poems, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reik, Theodor, 1927, ‘The psychological meaning of silence’, Psychoanalytic Review, [1968], 55: 172–186.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas, 1998, ‘The significance of silence’, European Review, 6(1): 91–95.Google Scholar
Richardson, Laurel, 1993, ‘Poetics, dramatics, and transgressive validity: The case of the skipped line’, The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4): 695–710.Google Scholar
Richter, David, 1985, ‘Two studies in iconic syntax: Tennyson’s “Tears, Idle Tears”, and Williams’s “The Dance”’, Language and Style, 18: 136–151.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, Shulamit, 2002, Narrative Fiction (2nd edition), [1983], London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, Ray (ed.), 2003, Famous Last Words, New York: Workman.Google Scholar
Rodman, Lilita, 1981, ‘The passive in technical and scientific writing’, Journal of Advanced Composition, 2(1–2): 165–172.Google Scholar
Römkens, Renée, 2000, ‘Ambiguous responsibilities: Law and conflicting expert testimony on the abused woman who shot her sleeping husband’, Law & Social Inquiry, 25: 355–391.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Eliezer, 1980, ‘A semiotico-syntactic study of verbs expressing an emotional state’, Lěšonénu, 65(1): 5–16 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Ruipérez, Martín S., 1953, ‘The neutralization of morphological oppositions as illustrated by the neutral aspect of the present indicative in Classical Greek’, Word, 9(3): 241–252.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, 1905, ‘On denoting’, Mind, 14(56): 479–493.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, 1992, Lectures on Conversation, in Jefferson, Gail (ed.), Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A., Schegloff and Jefferson, Gail, 1974. ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’, Language, 50: 696–735.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, 2010, ‘The uniformity and diversity of language: Evidence from sign language’, Lingua, 120(12): 2727 – 2732.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel, 1982, The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel, 1985, ‘The place of silence in an integrated theory of communication’, in Tannen, Deborah and Saville-Troike, Muriel (eds.), Perspectives on Silence, Northwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel, 1989, The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (2nd edition), Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel, 1994, ‘Silence’, in Asher, Ron E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 7: 3945–3947.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel, 2003, The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (3rd edition), Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel, 2006, ‘Silence: Cultural aspects’, in Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 379–381.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul, 1977, ‘Does she or doesn’t she?’, Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4): 763–767.Google Scholar
Scharf, Peter M., 1996, The Denotation of Generic Terms in Ancient Indian Philosophy: Grammar, Nyāya and Mīmāsā, Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Schefer, Jack and Karlins, Marvin, 2015, The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent’s Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, 1987, Discourse Markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Radefeldt, Jürgen, 1977, ‘On so-called “rhetorical” questions’, Journal of Pragmatics, 1: 375–392.Google Scholar
Schmit, John, 1993, ‘“I only said – the syntax – ”: Elision, recoverability, and insertion in Emily Dickinson’s Poetry’, Style, 27(1): 106–124.Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P., 2003, Diminutives in English, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Scott, Clifford W. M., 1958, ‘Noise, speech and technique’, International Journal of Psych-analysis, 39(2–4): 108–111.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert and Wilson, E., 2014, The Voyage of the Discovery (Cambridge Library Collection – Polar Exploration), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A., 1994, An Introduction to Semiotics, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Serani, Deborah, 2000, ‘Silence in the analytic space, resistance or reverie?’, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 36: 505–519.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Katherine and Dungan, Elizabeth, 2005, ‘Art Expedition Blind at Museum: Theresa Hak Kyung Cha’, University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive, http://archive.bampfa.berkeley.edu/art/AN0230 (accessed 14 July 2019).Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi, 1985, ‘Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis’, Language, 61(4), 821–848.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi, 1988, ‘Introduction’, in Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Passive and Voice, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Shirane, Haruo, 1998, Traces of Dreams: Landscape, Cultural Memory, and the Poetry of Bash, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstone, Roger, 1998, ‘Space’, Screen, 39(1): 81–84.Google Scholar
Silz, Walter, 1956, ‘Longfellow’s translation of Goethe’s “Ueber allen Gipfeln … ”’, Modern Language Notes, 71(5): 344–345.Google Scholar
Skinner, Daniel and Pludwin, Steven, 2013, ‘Unsought responsibility: The U.S. supreme court and the politics of passive writing’, Polity, 45(4): 499–524.Google Scholar
Smith, Paige H., Tessaro, Irene and Earp, Jo Anne, 1995, ‘Women’s experience with battering: A conceptualization from qualitative research’, Women’s Health Issues, 5: 197–182.Google Scholar
Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz, 1997. ‘Silence and markedness theory’, in Jaworski, Adam (ed.), Silence Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 39–61.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan, 1969, Styles of Radical Will, London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stafford, Laura E., 2007, Veni, Vidi, Futui: Sexual Imagery and Social Class in Roman Art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H., 1962, Modern English Structure, London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Sumner, Ives, 1957, ‘Defining parts of speech in English’, College English, 18(7): 341–348.Google Scholar
Sundén, Karl, 1904, Contribution to the Study of Elliptical Words in Modern English, Upsala: Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel, 2005, Analysing Sign Language Poetry, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel and Woll, Bencie, 1999, The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Norman and David J., Klugman, 1965, ‘No name: A study of anonymous suicidal telephone calls’, Psychiatry, 28(1): 79–87.Google Scholar
Takeda, Masako, 2013, ‘Emily Dickinson and Japanese Aesthetics’, The Emily Dickinson Journal, 22(2): 26–45.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, 1985, ‘Silence: Anything but’, in Tannen, Deborah and Saville-Troike, Muriel (eds.), Perspectives on Silence, Northwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 93–111.Google Scholar
Thomas, Andrew L., 1979, ‘Ellipsis: The interplay of sentence structure and context’, Lingua, 47: 43–68.Google Scholar
Thurber, Barton, 1984, ‘Speaking the unspeakable: Conrad and the sublime’, Conradiana, 16(1): 41–54.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter, 1995, ‘The language of silence’, Rutgers Law Review, 48(1): 1–100.Google Scholar
Toner, Anne, 2015, Ellipsis in English Literature: Signs of Omission, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 1974, The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Truglio, Maria, 2018, Italian Children’s Literature and National Identity, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsur, Reuven, 2001, ‘Onomatopoeia: Cuckoo-Language and Tick-Tocking – The constraints of semiotic systems’, www.tau.ac.il/~tsurxx/Cuckoo_onomatopoeia.html).Google Scholar
Tsur, Reuven, 2006, ‘Size-sound symbolism revisited’, Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 905–924.Google Scholar
Tyler, Stephen A., 1978, The Said and the Unsaid: Mind, Meaning, and Culture, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Uspensky, Boris, 1970, A Poetics of Composition (translation: Zavarin, Valentina and Witting, Susan), [1973], Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Yra, 2011, ‘Reading the form: The function of typographic blanks in modern poetry’, Word & Image: A Journal of Verbal/Visual Enquiry, 27(4): 407–415.Google Scholar
Van Oosten, Jeanne, 1986, The Nature of Subjects, Topics and Agents: A Cognitive Explanation, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Vanderbeke, Dirk, Gast, Volker and Wehmeier, Christian, 2017, ‘Of gaps and holes and silence: Some remarks on elliptic speech and pseudo-orality in James Joyce’s short story “The Sisters”’, Literary Linguistics, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.15462/ijll.v6i1 (accessed 27 February 2020).Google Scholar
Vargas, Marjorie F., 1986, Louder than Words: Introduction to Nonverbal Communication, Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Helen, 2007, Our Secret Discipline: Yeats and Lyric Form, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef, 1985, What People Say They Do with Words, Northwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Volek, Bronislava, 1987, Emotive Signs in Language and Semantic Functioning of Derived Nouns in Russian, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, Courtney, Mangum, Stephen L., Greenberger, David B., Heneman, Robert L. and Skoglind, Jeffrey D., 1997, ‘Temporary employment: Can organizations and employees both win?’, The Academy of Management Executive, 11(1): 93–104.Google Scholar
Wajnryb, Ruth, 2001, The Silence: How Tragedy Shapes Talk, Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Walter, Tony, 1999, ‘The questions people asked’, in Walter, Tony (ed.), The Mourning for Diana, New York: Berg, pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Watson, Rubie S., 1986, ‘The named and the nameless: Gender and person in Chinese society’, American Ethnologist, 13(4): 619–631.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. and Newfield, Madeleine, 1995, ‘Iconicity in the lexicon and its relevance for a theory of morphology’, in Lansberg, Marge E. (ed.), Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic-Freezes, Berlin and New York: The Human Dimension, pp. 189–221.Google Scholar
Websdale, Neil, 1998, Rural Women Battering and the Justice System: An Ethnography, London and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Webster, Michael, 1999, ‘Singling is silence’, in Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
Weisman, Avery D., 1955, ‘Silence and psychotherapy’, Psychiatry Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18: 241–260.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Elizabeth M., 1949, ‘VIII. Goethe’s Poetry’, German Life and Letters, 2(4): 316–329.Google Scholar
Williams, Kupling D., Wendelyn, Shore J. and Grahe, Jon E., 1998, ‘The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings’, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2): 117–141.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter, 2000, Mind the Gap: Ellipsis and Stylistic Variation in Spoken and Written English, Harlow: Longmman.Google Scholar
Winkelmann, Carol Lea, 2004, The Language of Battered Women: A Rhetorical Analysis of Personal Theologies, Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Clare, 1989, ‘D.W.W.: A reflection’, in Winnicott, Clare, Shepherd, Ray and Davis, Madeleine (eds.), Psycho-analytic Explorations, London: Karnac, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald W., 1958, ‘The capacity to be alone’, in Winnicott, Donald W., [1990], The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment, London: Karnac Books, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald W., 1963, ‘Communicating and not communicating’, in Winnicott, Donald W., [1990], The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment, London: Karnac Books, pp. 179–192.Google Scholar
Winston, Betsy, 2000, ‘It just doesn’t look like asl! Defining, recognizing and teaching prosody in asl’, in Swabey, Laurie (ed.), Celebrating Excellence, Celebrating Partnership, Proceedings of the 13th National Convention, Conference of Interpreter Trainers Portland. Silver Spring, MD: Rid Publications, pp. 103–117, www.cit-asl.org/new/2000-cit-conference-proceedings-download-pdf/ (accessed 30 May 2018).Google Scholar
Wiseman, Hadas and Jacques P., Barber, 2008, Echoes of Trauma, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1922, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (translation: Pears, David F. and .McGuinness, Brian F), [1961], London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wolf, Werner, 2003, ‘Non-supplemented blanks’, in Meader, Costantino and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Outside-in – in-side-out, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa, 1989, ‘The conversational historical present’, Linx, 20: 135–151.Google Scholar
Wood, Diana, 1989, Clement VI: The Pontificate and Ideas of an Avignon Pope, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yasuda, Kenneth, 1957, The Japanese Haiku: Its Essential Nature, History, and Possibilities in English, with Selected Examples, Rutland, VT: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Yasuda, Kenneth, 1995, ‘“Approach to Haiku” and “Basic principles”’, in Hume, Nancy G. (ed.), Japanese Aesthetics and Culture, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 125–150.Google Scholar
Young, Philip, 1966, Earnest Hemingway: A Reconsideration, University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Yule, George, 1998, Explaining English Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zapedowska, Magdalena, 2006, ‘A lesson in grammar: Dickinson’s “Grasped by God” and “Drowning is not so pitiful”’, The Emily Dickinson Journal, 15(1): 16–34.Google Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir, 1998, ‘What is phatic communication?’, in Rouchota, Villy and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Current Issues in Relevance Theory, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 327–361.Google Scholar
Zeligs, Meyer A., 1961, ‘The psychology of silence’, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 9: 7–43.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Evyatar, 2006, The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial in Everyday Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, George K., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology, Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Michal Ephratt, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Book: Silence as Language
  • Online publication: 18 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108650779.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Michal Ephratt, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Book: Silence as Language
  • Online publication: 18 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108650779.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Michal Ephratt, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Book: Silence as Language
  • Online publication: 18 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108650779.006
Available formats
×